My Critique of a Half-baked ‘Religious’ Text

[StephenMasten]

I basically critiqued a supposed 'religious' text inspired by Cosmotheism, written by some 'well meaning' young lad here in England of above average intelligence, pointing out how pathetic and embarrassing this attempt was compared with our glorious Creativity.

It's startling how many of these people - young people in particular (this lad is around 24, 25) - have these mad ideas about formulating their own religion, even after reading Nature's Eternal Religion and the White Man's Bible. Bow before a superior mind and Creed, sh!tlets. Bow before and embrace Creativity.

'Hello J....,

Apologies for not getting back to you sooner, but I have been rather busy with work and having to deal with many of my other racially loyal associates. I have taken the time to examine and comment on the first chapter of your book, as you requested, so here goes.

From the outset of your work there are a number of vague and uncommon terms and obscure phrases ('non-preconceived and omnidirectional' for example) that make the work seem inaccessible. It reminds me somewhat of the almost impenetrable first paragraph of the late Jonathan Bowden's work, 'GOODBYE, HOMUNCULUS,' which reads as follows:

'FIRST SPECTRUM OF INDETERMINACY: (1)
In Hell, per se, a scrimmage has formed this side of desolation; it exists in front of a goal which served as a gibbet. A blackened waste lay in the rear – and it already tempted its greyness; if only to lie awake before this aperture.'

I have a habit of reading this passage out to people during Skype calls and watching them squirm and recoil when I ask if they understand it. They invariably do not, though it can be deciphered (sort of) after half a dozen attempts. Now compare that with the almost poetic flow that comes with the opening of Ben Klassen's Nature's Eternal Religion:

'The Laws of Nature are Eternal
When we look at the natural world about us, we are awed at the beauty and the majesty of Nature. We view the delicate rosy sunsets reflected in the wispy clouds, we view the massive splendor of the mountains, gleaming and shining in their white coats of snow in the winter, bursting with greenery and the color of flowers in the spring and in the summer, painted with endless coats of yellow and red with the changing leaves in the autumn.'

Now that certainly made for easy reading and paints a vivid picture, doesn't it? And it keeps on like that from this point all the way to the last wonderful page. Instead of chaos, Creativity emphasises order and the eternal laws of Nature.

Your work touches on what I believe is termed 'transcendentalism,' which is not something I am especially familiar with or feel comfortable discussing. Not claiming to be a physicist or expert in the subject of physics (a subject of which, if I recall, you have a great deal of enthusiasm), this rather nebulous subject (transcendentalism) causes me to feel a little uneasy and out of my depth. As a humble student at the University of Life, I feel far more comfortable with the following, again from Nature's Eternal Religion:

'We don't understand it all, we have no idea how long Nature has been putting on her bountiful displays. We just know that year after year Nature rolls through her seasons of winter, spring, summer and fall. We just know that Nature is always the same, yet always changing. We see as spring approaches flowers come forth out of the ground and later begin to bloom in their profuse colors, only to wither and wilt during the summer, produce their seed in the fall, and go to sleep under a blanket of snow during the winter. Then comes spring again, and seeds burst forth into a new generation of flowers and the same cycle is repeated again.'

That'll do me, as they say. I'm also not too keen on this talk of man attaining 'omnipotence,' an idea that I find completely ridiculous. On page two of your work you state the following:

'As hazards in the universe include those which may be posed by other  intelligent life, eternal immunity may belong solely to a single omnipotent species, which, by its supreme  power, stands unthreatened by all others. This state of omnipotence we call 'Godhood', and that which occupies this state may be called 'God'.'

Why does the above (and other passages from your work) conjure up images of aliens, other worlds and pink clouds at the far end - or outside - of the universe? Regardless, it all sounds like meaningless obfuscation to me. Again, it brings me back to my own religious text, in which the ever lucid Ben Klassen succinctly observes:

'Man has already unveiled millions of Nature's mysteries. Today man is discovering more of Nature's eternal laws at an increasing rate. Through technology he is increasingly benefiting by his understanding of Nature's mysteries. It is fairly safe to say that although mankind will continue to rapidly expand his knowledge of Nature's laws, that it will never, never solve more than a small fraction of them.'

Finally, I have to touch on the most important and most glaring omission from your text: no mention of race, or more specifically, the White Race. I don't believe the word White, Aryan, European, Europid, caucasian, caucasoid, or any other nomenclature that describes our species of man appears even once in your script. Not acceptable.

Contrast that to the religious texts of Creativity, where hardly a page goes by where it is not made abundantly clear that we Creators are Racial Loyalists and for the White Race and the White Race exclusively. This I wouldn't have any other way. Would any lowlife degenerate dare attempt to misinterpret our creed, in order that we come to embrace miscegenation and thus our own self-destruction? ('You shall keep your race pure. Pollution of the White Race is a heinous crime against Nature and against your own race.'-5th Commandment of Creativity.) I'd like to see them try.

Basically my conclusion is (how do I put this...) all good White Racial Loyalists need to abandon their hubris and embrace Creativity, the most articulate, scientific, complete and comprehensive White racial religious creed in the history of the world.

Of course people can nitpick - I have done it myself: 'I don't like the flag,' 'I don't like the term "RaHoWa,"' (don't use it then) 'I don't like "church"' (call it a 'creed' or 'religion of Creativity,' smart-arse), 'I don't like that it was written by an American,' (born in the Ukraine, raised and educated in Canada), et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Yes, granted, it isn't perfect. But Creativity is the best we have.

Hope this helps, and hope my feedback won't annoy you too much.
Be well, J...., and delenda est Judaica.

[Grimm]

I basically critiqued a supposed 'religious' text inspired by Cosmotheism, written by some 'well meaning' young lad here in England of above average intelligence, pointing out how pathetic and embarrassing this attempt was compared with our glorious Creativity.

This was an interesting attempt to blend Christianity with the "mystic" teachings of the early mystery schools currently represented by the AMORC: http://www.amorc.org/ 



THE ROSICRUCIAN COSMO-CONCEPTION OR MYSTIC CHRISTIANITY
AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE UPON MAN'S PAST EVOLUTION, PRESENT CONSTITUTION AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
BY MAX HEINDEL [1865-1919]

Its Message and Mission: A SANE MIND. A SOFT HEART. A SOUND BODY.

INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
ROSICRUCIAN FELLOWSHIP
Mount Ecclesia
2222 Mission Avenue
Oceanside, California, USA, 92058-2329
http://www.rosicrucian.com/pdf_plaza/Rosicrucian%20Cosmo-Conception.pdf

Strip it of its Christian decorations and it is a wonderful trip... well I'll stop that sentence and share an interesting tidbit.

-----------------------

The Original Semites were the fifth and most important of the seven Atlantean Races, because in them we find the first germ of the corrective quality of Thought. Therefore the Original Semitic Race become the "seed-race" for the seven races of the present Aryan Epoch.

In the Polarian Epoch man acquired the dense body as an instrument of action. In the Hyperborean Epoch the vital body was added to give power of motion necessary to action. In the Lemurian Epoch the desire body furnished incentive to action.

The mind was given to man in the Atlantean Epoch to give purpose to action, but as the Ego was exceedingly weak and the desire nature strong, the ascent mind coalesced with the desire body, the faculty of Cunning resulted and was the cause of all the wickedness of the middle third of the Atlantean Epoch ....

[Rev.Cambeul]

The Original Semites were the fifth and most important of the seven Atlantean Races, because in them we find the first germ of the corrective quality of Thought. Therefore the Original Semitic Race become the "seed-race" for the seven races of the present Aryan Epoch.  In the Polarian Epoch man acquired the dense ...

Total garbage. Not even worth the effort that the Rev put into his critique of some kid's fantasy religion.

[Albert]

Its good to keep Creativity up to date by having a swipe, Ben Klassen style, at any rival philosophies that might ensnare our people. Scientology needs a critique as does some of the "Annunaki giberrish" that some racial loyalists are often slopping around. It is always good for the White Race to clarify our peoples thinking. It is tragic how far too many seem to prefer hokum pokum to rationality, science and truth.

[Grimm]

Check it out, that Rosicrucian book even has a crude version of salubrious living.

Science of Nutrition:

http://www.rosicrucian.com/rcc/rcceng17.htm#part3

Food value table 1:

http://www.rosicrucian.com/images/rccen30a.gif

Food value table 2:

http://www.rosicrucian.com/images/rccen30b.gif

Law of Assimilation:

http://www.rosicrucian.com/rcc/rcceng17.htm#part4