Messages

[might]

The other day I felt compelled to post a comment on Creativity Movement forum after reading a post by a certain 'Wilhelm,' who had been selflessly and laboriously highlighting hundreds of errors in the online versions of Nature's Eternal Religion. This fellow was kindly and helpfully bringing these errors to the attention of his fellow Creators that were in a position to make the online documents more perfect for public consumption. I was impressed and excited by what I saw. Sadly, others were not. Blandly and begrudgingly, some so-called Creator (a Croat going by the username 'Tormentor'), responded to this work, saying he would correct the html version as soon as possible (though as you will see, he would later completely contradict himself, both about him promise to correct the errors and the value of the errors being highlighted).

'ok, I'll find it useful and correct the errors in Creator Library version of NER.'

In my view this work would take a couple of hours, but even if it took all day it would be worth doing in order to make this wonderful masterpiece (NER) more presentable for online viewers, and of course conserve the dignity of Founder Ben Klassen.

I initially felt the urge to take the time to commend this Croat fellow for getting on with the job. But before I did, I made sure to check the website, or 'library,' to see if the corrections had been implemented. Lo and behold, they had not. Not even the first error that was highlighted, which could have been corrected by a simple cut and paste. Pure laziness.

So I replied to this individuals comment:

'I just took a quick look at the library and no corrections have been made. Why is this?'

Immediately after I posted the above, I read his second comment, a reply to a certain James Logsdon, in which he stated the following:

'I haven't started it yet, was busy. You can correct the books in doc or pdf if you can, I might correct the html version on Creator Library.'

Annoyed, I quickly gave him a piece of my mind:

'You 'might' correct the html version? Might? What kind of lazy attitude is this? Do you love, and are you committed to, our glorious religion of CREATIVITY or what? Kindly pull your socks up and get your arse in gear. All you have to do is login to the site and correct the errors that Wilhelm has so assiduously and painstakingly highlighted. How long will that take? An hour or two? If that. :-/'

Then I responded to another user, 'TorontoCreator,' who seemed to be (I may be wrong here) more open to reason:

'Hello Toronto. See how much effort Wilhelm has put into highlighting all the errors in our Holy Text, even after being needlessly derided and mocked as a do-nothing by these people. Yet here is the response of this 'Tormentor' fellow after initially vowing to 'correct the errors in Creator Library version of NER': 'I haven't started it yet, was busy. You can correct the books in doc or pdf if you can, I might correct the html version on Creator Library.' Do you think this is an acceptable attitude? Frankly I find it sickening. Be well.'

Here is the haughty reply from this despicable degenerate, 'Tormentor':

'Look, little fellow, I have no idea who you are, and you obviously have no idea who I am otherwise you would talk differently. I am certainly not going to explain to you the amount of work that I do every day for Creativity. People here know who I am, what I did and what I do, to you I have no reason to explain it. About your question why hasn't it been done yet and well it will be, my answer is, I was very busy as am always and it will be done when I get some free time, it might be this weekend it might be in a month, none of your concern. If you really want to know I am the guy that created Creator Library and made all those html versions in all those languages, that's around 2000 files, that is just about Library and people here know of my other work, which never stops. Now, if you really want to do something, beside provoking, both you and Wilhelm, which I assume is the same person in the first place, you should correct those html versions or PDFs if you like on your own, but no, you haven't done it. Finding errors is fine, so why not correcting it? Go ahead do it, why waiting? I guess you have a lot of free time so correct it, I haven't seen you are doing a lot of projects so you are some busy man, while on the other hand I am. For the record, I need to explain something to folks who are not well familiar with computers. If both of these characters wanted to correct PDF or doc versions of files they could have done it on their own a long time ago. Another thing, finding mistakes in a text is no job at all, you just put it in word file and turn on ''grammar and spelling'' check, and it instantly shows errors. The whole time these characters wasted on copying those mistakes and putting a list of it, at the same time they could have corrected those same mistakes. This shows what kind of Creators they are, and that pisses me off. Instead of correcting errors, they chose to rub it on our noses and now this clown even ''demands'' explanation why I haven't done it? At the same time that clown obviously doesn't realize that he is the one that should be correcting it since English is his own language while my native language is not English, although I speak it perfectly.

I must say one more thing, while I have been very and extremely tolerant towards all those who provoke us with this kind of attitude, I must say that I will not tolerate it anymore. No, certainly not. We have whole playground full of creatures behind internet anonymity pretending to be some important figures who will dictate who is right and what has to be done etc, while in reality they have done almost nothing for Creativity.
But again, trust me brothers, we will overcome such obstacles and backstabbing, that's why I will do those corrections when I have spare time, but these clowns will always be remembered as provocateurs.'

He then followed with:

'As I already explained the time Wilhelm spent into highlighting errors he could have corrected the errors. Finding errors is no job as I explained, computer finds them for you, so he didn't do anything, except wasting time on copying the and posting them online.
Furthermore, next time you log in I expect you apologize to me for calling me sickening, or I will delete you, simply because I, as one of the most active Creators around and probably 10 times more active than yourself, am not going to be degraded in such a way. Be well, as you say.'

Why are these people so utterly obnoxious? So disagreeable and mean? So determined to push intelligent and well-meaning people away from them and Creativity? What on earth has gone wrong in their messed up lives to make them such vile creatures?

Anyway, I could spend an hour examining and highlighting the stupidity of the above response from 'Tormentor' - such as how imperfect the writer's English is, though he claims to speak it perfectly; how brainless it is to think that he can correct errors in a text using grammar and spellcheck when the errors are not necessarily spelling mistakes (rather words being changed) and some of the text is missing, something that the most sophisticated grammar and spellcheck software in the universe could not detect - but I won't even bother.

These people are beyond reason. And to demonstrate just how unreasonable they are, shortly after this idiot from Croatia responded to me, my account on that website was arbitrarily deleted, as I imagine was the account of this mystery 'Wilhelm,' whoever that person may be. For now we are mere 'clowns' who 'will always be remembered as provocateurs.' What absolute scum they are. :-/

As for this Croatian, 'Tormentor,' it seems that everything that comes out of this individual is negativity and condescending contempt for others. Again it makes me wonder, what on earth went wrong in this persons life? This isn't normal behaviour, is it? It's like he and others are using Creativity as a platform to project their depraved misanthropy, something that is anything but Creativity.

[Real Disposable Income Plummets Most In 40 Years]

Real Disposable Income Plummets Most In 40 Years
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-31/wtf-going-real-disposable-income-plummets-most-40-years
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 01/31/2014 09:11 -0500

We may not know much about "Keynesian economics" (and neither does anyone else: they just plug and pray, literally), but we know one thing: when real disposable personal income drops by 0.2% from a month earlier, and plummets by 2.7% from a year ago,  the biggest collapse since the semi-depression in 1974, something is wrong with the US consumer.



And longer-term chart:

Recently our fellow pro-White, the ever kooky though (I hope) well-meaning John D. Nugent, shared a rather dubious Mail Online article on Facebook titled 'Is this proof near-death experiences ARE real?'

The author of the piece claims that 'Near Death Experiences' are 'real' and that we need not worry about the nebulous afterlife, as it is such a wonderful paradise in which we meet up with the ghosts of our dead relatives, etc.. With all this 'wonder' and 'heavenly happiness,' one wonders why those who experience such hallucinations don't simply jump out of the nearest window and get back to the heavenly hereafter. Strangely they seldom (if ever) do this. 

After reading the article in question, I had the audacity (dare I say, the chutzpah) to post a comment questioning the validity of the authors claims, a comment that clearly irked Mr. Nugent. His immediate response was to delete my comment and made the following statement:

'I AM NOT OBLIGATED TO LEAVE POSTS UP PROMOTING ATHEISM. Post them on your own page.'

He then edited his post to read 'Start your own thread there proving there is no God . '

Fair enough, I said, I will do so. At least to his initial comment. Refuting the existence of non-existent spooks is of course not necessary, as the burden of proof is on the party affirming, not the party denying.

Anyway, for your reading pleasure, here is the offending comment:

'With all due respect, John, how can this MailOnline piece be regarded as 'proof' that 'Near Death Experiences' (and therefore the hereafter) are 'real'? Methinks it wishful thinking more like. Personally I find it disgraceful that a supposed professional news outlet would give this silliness the time of day. This contemptible rag is perpetuating superstition, giving the poor gullible yokels false hope in a nebulous and non-existent hereafter when they ought to be grounding their readership in reality.

No doubt people do experience Near Death Experiences, but they are simply hallucinations, comforting figments of the convoluted human imagination. Which is not at all surprising when we consider the fact that those who experience these strange apparitions are usually extremely ill, near death and drugged up to the eyeballs on medication at the time of the event.

'Can all these people — and the many more that I've interviewed — be delusional?' asks the author Penny Sartori, a woman who unconvincingly claims that she first delved into the phenomena of Near Death Experiences as a 'cynic.' The answer, overwhelmingly, is *YES,* these critically ill and dying hospital patients are indeed delusional.

These poor ailing individuals have been terribly unwell, even to the point of actually being close to death. That there is little doubt. At this moment, for whatever reason, that eternally complex organ that is still a mystery even to the most learned and erudite of scientists (the brain) has resorted to this compassionate hallucination just before the glow of life fades forever.

That is my conclusion anyway. There must always be a rational explanation. When an individual constantly poses the question, 'How do you explain this phenomena,' then uses the fact that scientists haven't been able to sufficiently answer the question (to their liking) to then go on a fantastic flight of fancy, is completely unacceptable for the rational thinking mind. We always meet such wild stories with a suspicious and sceptical eye, and finally scorn.

'A skeptical and inquiring mind is no vice. Being gullible and superstitious is no virtue.' That is a quote from our very own White Man's Bible (CREDO 71). I suppose I ought to pin on my 'Young Soul' badge right now, hey John? ' (John de Nugent believes (based on what evidence I have no idea) that people who do not believe in spooks are 'young souls,' like babies to be pitied. The fortunate 'old souls,' like himself (and his former assistant Jason Salyers) are lightyears ahead of the rest of us pathetic newbies.)

[Food Stamp Recipients Dominated By "Working Age Americans" For First Time On Record]

Food Stamp Recipients Dominated By "Working Age Americans" For First Time On Record

Submitted by Mike Krieger of Liberty Blitzkrieg blog,

When people ask me to describe the state of the U.S. economy, what I always say is that it can best characterized as an ongoing state-sanctioned theft. This theft consists of the 0.01% oligarch class intentionally leveraging a corrupt monetary and political system in order to funnel all of the wealth of the non-oligarch rich and middle-class upward to them. The underclasses are kept quiet and in-line via food stamps and other forms of so-called "welfare."

In reality, I have frequently maintained that food stamps are actually corporate welfare and that the stock market represents food stamps for the 1%. The entire economy is a gigantic bait and switch in which a handful of people rape and pillage everyone else.

With unemployment and GDP statistics hopelessly manipulated, we must look at other data points in order to gain an understanding of how things really stand. Data related to food stamp rolls is one way to gain real insight into the true state of the U.S. economy.

In an excellent article from the Associate Press, we learn several things.

•For the first time ever, working-age people now make up the majority in U.S. households that rely on food stamps.
•Food stamp participation since 1980 has grown the fastest among workers with some college training.
•By education, about 28 percent of food stamp households are headed by a person with at least some college training, up from 8 percent in 1980.

More from the AP:

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a first, working-age people now make up the majority in U.S. households that rely on food stamps — a switch from a few years ago, when children and the elderly were the main recipients.

Some of the change is due to demographics, such as the trend toward having fewer children. But a slow economic recovery with high unemployment, stagnant wages and an increasing gulf between low-wage and high-skill jobs also plays a big role. It suggests that government spending on the $80 billion-a-year food stamp program — twice what it cost five years ago — may not subside significantly anytime soon.


"High employment, stagnant wages." Huh? Don't these people realize we've been in a recovery for almost five years now!


Food stamp participation since 1980 has grown the fastest among workers with some college training, a sign that the safety net has stretched further to cover America's former middle class, according to an analysis of government data for The Associated Press by economists at the University of Kentucky. Formally called Supplemental Nutrition Assistance, or SNAP, the program now covers 1 in 7 Americans.


Notice the statement, "America's former middle class." At least they are honest. The middle class is gone.


Since 2009, more than 50 percent of U.S. households receiving food stamps have been adults ages 18 to 59, according to the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey. The food stamp program defines non-elderly adults as anyone younger than 60.

As recently as 1998, the working-age share of food stamp households was at a low of 44 percent, before the dot-com bust and subsequent recessions in 2001 and 2007 pushed new enrollees into the program, according to the analysis by James Ziliak, director of the Center for Poverty Research at the University of Kentucky.

By education, about 28 percent of food stamp households are headed by a person with at least some college training, up from 8 percent in 1980. Among those with four-year college degrees, the share rose from 3 percent to 7 percent. High-school graduates head the bulk of food stamp households at 37 percent, up from 28 percent. In contrast, food stamp households headed by a high-school dropout have dropped by more than half, to 28 percent.


So basically, young people are being encouraged to take on a mountain of suffocating debt to go to college and get a worthless degree only to move into their parents basements and collect food stamps. Now that's what I call a recovery.

Several economists say food stamp rolls are likely to remain elevated for some time. Historically, there has been a lag before an improving unemployment rate leads to a substantial decline in food stamp rolls; the Congressional Budget Office has projected it could take 10 years.


This is particularly the case when unemployment statistics are entirely fabricated.


Full- and part-time workers employed year-round saw the fastest growth in food stamp participation since 1980, making up 17 percent and 7 percent of households, respectively. In contrast, the share of food stamp households headed by an unemployed person has remained largely unchanged, at 53 percent. Part-year workers declined in food stamp share.


Welcome to serfdom. You have arrived America.

Klassen Letters Volume One

November 18, 1970.
Nationalist White Party
OUR CREED
FOURTEEN POINTS
POINT 12.
It is our objective to raise the cultural, ethical and moral values of White America to ever greater heights and finer values. We must promote the teaching of the value of our White racial heritage, the unique value of our blood lines, that race is all and that the survival of culture and civilization is dependent upon its creator - the White Race. This must be strongly instilled into the minds of our children throughout their formative years, and promoted in our educational systems from kindergarten through college. We must keep impressing upon the mind of every child, every adult, the ideals of "Racial Loyalty, Racial Pride, and Racial Unity." Also, our news media, theatre, radio and television must be utilized to impress this great truth upon the White people of America so that never again will the White Man's thinking be sabotaged and subverted for his own destruction.

[....]We must therefore make every White man conscious of where his true loyalty lies - with his own racial family, his own people. We intend to field an increasing number of political candidates every year until we are in power. We must make every political candidate face the crucial acid test - is he on the side of the White race or is he on the side of the Jews and the Negroes? We intend to force every candidate to take sides. Just as the Jews and the Negroes have bloc voted for years, the White man must bloc vote for the loyal White candidates. Every candidate must stand exposed - is he loyal to the White Race or is he a race traitor? And woe to him that is a race traitor. White Man - Unite and Fight! Victory is Certain.