Messages

Updated link:

Carmina Burana , Carl Orff (Ponnelle)

[Defiant Frazier Glenn Miller, up against the wall]

Rev. Will Williams' post over at White Nations this afternoon:

Marge, Glenn's wife, told someone that he called her from the casino, drunk, but gave no indication he'd soon be going on a very poorly planned shooting spree.


Defiant Frazier Glenn Miller, up against the wall

Glenn has been ill with rather severe respiratory problems lately. Sounds like a typical SBC (Suicide By Cop) scenario that failed. We haven't heard the last from FGM since he survived and henceforth will be sober.

Glenn has always said that half of what he has learned about the enemy he learned from Dr. Pierce. It's too bad he didn't learn much of the other half of Dr. Pierce's absolutely sober teachings, like this, quoted in Fred's other WN post on this subject:

[WLP:]
Can you imagine our enemies acting in such an immature and  undisciplined way?...The reason America's internal enemies are winning now is because  they not only use their heads to make plans, but they also exercise  self-discipline. They keep their feelings under control...Random acts of violence don't make  sense now. Temper tantrums are not helpful. What we need now is  self-discipline, not self-indulgence. It's good for us to remember now  the old, old rule for people who want to get rid of a king. The rule is:  kill the king with your first stroke; don't merely wound the king,  because if you do he surely will kill you.

Lesson Learned #1.

Lesson #2: Alcohol and WN do not mix.

Now check this out. A former billionaire, Chuck Feeney, gives most of his 6.3 Billion fortune to 'philanthropic' causes. Apparently this is all part of 'The Giving Pledge,' where the richest men in the world, including Warren Buffet and Bill Gates, pledge to give all their money to help 'improve the human condition.' Does anybody think for a moment that this money will be used in any way to help advance the White Race? You can bet your sweet life that it won't. On the contrary, these vast sums of money will be used to help mongrelise and destroy us. What a horrible waste. If so many of these people are so ready and willing to pour their fortunes down a rat-hole in this way, one would think that at least one of them would 'go nuts' and 'waste' a billion or two helping to advance the Cause of the White Race. If some anonymous White billionaire donor decided to 'throw away' a billion or two into the Cause of the White Race, the results would be earth moving. It would be a wonderful marvel to behold. But no, this has not happened. Super-rich Jews invest billions - even trillions - helping to advance the cause of the Jewish race, and that is considered perfectly acceptable (which it is). So why can't these super-rich 'goyim' do likewise for their own kind? This is treason as far as I am concerned. Throwing billions away in the useless attempt to advance the turd-world and not giving a second thought for the plight of the White Race is pure treason.

[ARTICLE]

After reading MailOnline ARTICLE titled 'Our TV shows are far too white, says Lenny Henry' I had this to say:

'This anti-white creature Lenny Henry never stops banging on about how few blacks there are on television. This from a man who strangely doesn't much care for black women, instead opting for a horrible, ugly, repulsive, fat white-skinned slob before he would go near one of his own kind. A while back I remember him complaining that there were too few black people in the Harry Potter films. He complained so loud and long about this 'disgraceful' discrimination that the film creators gave this big mouth a part in one of the films, namely The Prisoner of Azkaban. They had to invent a pointless 'shrunken head' character who - in typical Lenny Henry style - makes a lot of senseless noise, just to keep people like him happy. (This character doesn't even appear in the books!) I have only recently watched the first few Harry Potter films, after I discovered there is an anti-white theme throughout the series, and from what I can see, there are too bleedin' many blacks in the films. Screeching about the place and generally making things look untidy, their very presence ruins these otherwise charming films. They ruin the films, they ruin the television, they ruin the music, they ruin their (and our) neighbourhoods. And we need more of this and less White people he says? No thank you, Lenny. I say more White people. More, more, more. '

[Losers, Hobbyists, and the "Movement"]

Losers, Hobbyists, and the "Movement"
Editorial  by Dr. Pierce from National Alliance BULLETIN, March 2000

An interesting psychological phenomenon on which I have commented on in several issues of the BULLETIN is that displayed by people who send hostile letters to the National Office saying, in effect: "You people claim to be Christians, but you ignore the teachings of the Bible, which says that all races are the same. Don't you even know that Jesus was a Jew?" They have had the idea planted in their heads that the Alliance is some sort of Christian organization, presumably by Jewish propaganda linking us to Christian Identity and Catholic traditionalist groups, which also are on the Jews' hit list. Reading our material or listening to one of my broadcasts should persuade them otherwise, but it doesn't. It probably took quite a bit of effort by the Jews to pound the idea into their heads, and it'll take dynamite to get it out.

Unfortunately, one can observe a similar phenomenon in many people nominally on our side, even in some Alliance members. I have announced over and over again our policy toward other organizations, and I nevertheless continue to receive letters to the effect: "All of us in the 'movement' must stick together. We should unite with all of the other patriotic organizations, and then we'll be much stronger. Etc." To me this view indicates either hobbyism or a serious deficiency in the writer's powers of discrimination. If you don't remember what hobbyism is, re-read section 3.c.iii.2 of your copy of the Membership Handbook.

The Internet has given many inadequate people the ability to pretend to be more than they are. Any troubled teenager or unemployed alcoholic can get a web site, set himself up as a phone-booth Fuhrer, and begin collecting "followers," and many do. They are the ones to whom the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Southern Poverty Law Center are referring when they announce that "the number of 'hate groups' on the Internet is now 457, up 23 per cent since 1999." Two outstanding examples are a teenaged Jew named Andy Greenbaum, who used the name "Bo Decker" and set up an "organization" he called "Knights of Freedom"; and a professional disseminator of disinformation named Harold Covington (a.k.a. "Winston Smith"). Greenbaum self-destructed last year, when he announced a giant march in Washington and only two of his "followers" showed up for the march. Covington occasionally still makes Internet attacks on the Alliance, but he is far less prolific than he was a year or so ago.

There are dozens of others who are still active, however. One is a TV repairman in California named Tom Metzger, who publishes a tabloid addressed primarily to skinheads and prisoners called "White Aryan Resistance' ("WAR"). Metzger promotes an ideology that is a blend of racial nationalism and class resentment, commonly called "national bolshevism." Another, also in California, publishes a newsletter called "The Nationalist Observer." Both are proponents of an "strategy" known as "leaderless resistance," according to which, at the appropriate time, hundreds or even thousands of revolutionary cells, consisting of one to five patriots each, will materialize spontaneously and will overthrow the government by sabotaging or bombing government and media facilities and assassinating politicians, leading Jews, collaborators, and other enemies of our people. All of these cells will operate independently, without centralized organization or direction or infrastructure, so that it will be nearly impossible for the government to infiltrate them or spy on them, and the government never will know where or when they will strike next.

Actually, Metzger and other "leaderless resistance" advocates are not so much in favor of "leaderless resistance" as they are against any sort of organized activity. Their thesis is that any organized activity is certain to fail because it will be infiltrated by government informants and provocateurs, and that any racial patriot who joins an organization is a fool who is allowing the government to get his name on the blacklist for unspecified, but presumably severe, reprisals.

All of this theorizing takes place in the make-believe world of revolutionary hobbyism. In the real world, "leaderless resistance" is simply an excuse for losers, cowards, and shirkers to do nothing except talk to each other.  Building an effective organization of any sort is difficult work, and those who don't like work or who have tried to build an organization and failed often are resentful of any effort that shows signs of success. Their reasoning is, "I tried it and wasn't successful; therefore, it can't be done." And the reason that nearly every organizational effort has failed has not been government spies or provocateurs; it has been the low quality of the human material in the organization. Certainly, the Alliance has never had any damage done to it by government agents. Every major difficulty we have had has been the consequence of bad judgment or bad behavior on the part of a member.

It's always difficult working with people. It must be a real nightmare trying to run an organization that has no quality standards for membership and that maintains a flamboyant and sensationalist public image attractive to hooligans, drunken brawlers, criminals, sociopaths, and other losers.

The latest issue of Resistance Magazine (of which I am the publisher) had an article written by a professional soldier who pointed out the unworkability of "leaderless resistance." Unfortunately, he mistakenly used the "Order" organized in 1984 by Robert Mathews as an example of why it doesn't work. In fact, the "Order," based on the fictional organization of the same name in The Turner Diaries, was a centralized organization with a strong leader. Because of the author's slip, a few of the phone-booth Fuhrers, who already were resentful of the Alliance's progress and were stung by the article's undiplomatic treatment of their favorite excuse for their own failure, saw an opportunity to criticize the Alliance and seized it. They Xeroxed dozens of copies of the offending article and mailed them to everyone on their mailing lists, including the imprisoned surviving members of the "Order." They wrote a letter to go with the Xeroxed article, and although Robert Mathews is not even named in the article, their letter said, in effect: "Look, look! Pierce is attacking Bob Mathews, our martyred hero! Isn't that shameful?"

Seeing the article described as an attack on Robert Mathews led some of the readers to look at it that way, and they duly registered their own indignation. The phone-booth Fuhrers then posted everything to the Internet, where it was the most titillating subject for gossip among the hobbyists for several weeks. The term "movement" was frequently used by the hobbyists, as in: "Pierce has shown disrespect for a martyr of the 'movement.' He should be expelled from the 'movement.'" Or: "No, no! We must have unity in the 'movement.'"

It's a little hard to say exactly what the term means to the Internet gossips. To most, it seems to be a clubby sort of concept which includes all of "us" and excludes everyone else. Although I have found the term useful in some contexts in the past, it probably should be abandoned because it has been so badly misused by the hobbyists. Really, what self respecting racial nationalist wants to be considered part of a "movement' which includes all of the phone-booth Fuhrers, the Internet gossips, and an embarrassingly high quota of born losers?

It's easy enough to understand this club mentality. As our society disintegrates under the onslaught of Jew-instigated multiculturalism, people look for something to hold onto: a sense of belonging, of community. We feel more secure when we have a sense of solidarity with others of like mind. A comforting sense of security is not the primary thing that Alliance members should be seeking, however. We want strength. We want new capabilities. We want to gain an advantage over the enemies of our people. We want anything which brings us closer to victory, whether it is comfortable or not.

The truth of the matter is, there's not much advantage to be gained inside the "movement." It is too heavily freighted with chronic losers, incurable hobbyists, phone-booth Fuhrers, and other defectives. Perhaps the "movement" is no worse than the general public in this regard, but we're looking for the best and strongest people we can find, and we find them much more often outside the "movement" than inside it. It is time for all members who have been focused on the "movement" either to reorient themselves in an outward direction or to find another organization to devote themselves to. As our tempo and our work load increase, being in the Alliance will be less and less fun for those whose primary aim is to amuse themselves with "movement" gossip. And I will have less patience with hobbyists and with those who believe that the Alliance is part of the "movement." Our aim is not to be the biggest and best organization in the "movement"; it is to leave the "movement" to its clubby introspection while we get on with the job of building a revolutionary infrastructure.

We respect our martyrs, and all of those who have shown courage or made sacrifices for our people, but we'll build monuments to them after the revolution. Meanwhile, winning is all that we care about, not the fun of playing the game by "movement" rules.