Messages

[Video 1: Section 127 Must DieVideo 2: Getting Detained by Counter Terrorism]

Video 1: Section 127 Must Die
Video 2: Getting Detained by Counter Terrorism

Videos from Callum Darragh
https://www.youtube.com/@Britannica1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lz76AMgaRpA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=991kRp8KUmo

So what's next? Creativity badge is made a Nazi/Terrorist symbol? Wear your religious gear and try prove you aren't a terrorist in court?

Is Creativity considered a banned neo-Nazi group? I'm glad you asked.

I'll answer in two sections:

(1) National Socialist Network identifies itself as a neo-Nazi group by including the words National Socialist within its name. Further, the historical usage - only prevented by Australian law - of swastikas, NS style runes, pictures of Adolf Hitler and other old National Socialist iconography only adds to proof to the self-stated declaration that NSN is neo-Nazi.

There would be an issue 'lurking in the background' about 'the constitutional protection of the implied freedom of political communication', Robbins' lawyer said.

'It gives rise to questions about the validity of any law that seeks to prevent contact and communication between members of, if you like, a political party,' the lawyer said.

But the prosecutor said the groups were 'not a political party' and had taken part in a 'co-ordinated incident resulting in criminal offences'.

(2) Political parties and religious groups have more rights than social groups such as NSN. And while political parties can be legally banned in Australia, religions cannot. Creativity is a religion. The Creator logo is a religious symbol. The NSN logo is a self-declared neo-Nazi symbol. Any symbol utilised by the NSN is automatically potentially banned, as the law bans the display of any symbol that is considered to be "Nazi."Like all laws, South Australia's law banning the public display of "Nazi" symbols is designed to be vague in order that police, courts and politicians can gain the most use in a corrupt draconian environment. Therefore, there is nothing within the law limiting its usage to historical or Third Reich symbols. In South Australia, you can conceivably be arrested for wearing an AC/DC or KISS logo shirt (Nazi symbols), and a hat and sunglasses (disguise), while hailing a bus (Nazi salute).

Political Rights: Simply put Dr Jim's Australia First Party has more rights than NSN. While AFP members cannot be arrested for displaying the party logo,  the party can still be banned and the logo outlawed a Nazi/Terrorist symbol with the flick of a pen by the state or the fed based on the personal biases of civil servants and opportunist politicians.

Religious Rights: Creativity as a religion and the Creativity Alliance incorporating your Church of Creativity as a religious group is protected by the Australian Constitution. They may not like us, and they may destroy our lives, but the government cannot ban our religion just because they disagree with it. That can only be decided by a panel of three judges in the High Court of Australia. And declaring Creativity to be an illegal religion in Australia is in breach of international treaties and UN declarations on freedom. Also, Creativity has already been acknowledged numerous times in US Federal and state courts as a legitimate religion. Therefore they cannot ban our religion or our church emblems without setting a dangerous precedent threatening all religious freedom in Australia.

Ergo, South Australia's political police can go screw themselves.

[OUTRAGEOUS That This is Happening]

OUTRAGEOUS That This is Happening
video from https://www.youtube.com/@BlackBeltBarrister

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RfGIQ2nPxwE

https://www.twitter.com/RupertLowe10/status/1883479685902078400

['Under an hour': Trump enemy 'caves']

This is exactly what should happen when countries knowingly expatriate their known criminals and insane to the good ol' U.S.

'Under an hour': Trump enemy 'caves'

It didn't take long after Donald Trump's announcement of huge retaliatory measures for another nation's government to cave to his demands.

It has been confirmed that Colombia initially approved the flights before they took off, only to change its mind abruptly. Shortly after Mr Trump's announcement, the Colombian government said it would send its own president's plane to repatriate the migrants in question - a move that has been interpreted as Colombia "caving".

Sources: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14327629/Colombia-caves-Trumps-tariff-threat-offers-plane-migrants.html

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/us-politics-live-updates-colombia-blocks-us-deportation-flights/live-coverage/a0c56449de1819d20e86a7c22f73b785

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/01/26/colombias-petro-backs-down-sending-personal-plane-to-pick-up-migrants-after-trump-announced-sanctions

[The "anti-white" Southport attacker is ideologically aligned with the "decolonising" state]

The "anti-white" Southport attacker is ideologically aligned with the "decolonising" state
Video from https://www.youtube.com/@LeoKearse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yKAxU13HjbM

From Source: The Southport attack and the rape gang scandal expose a broken social contract in Britain, where the state no longer protects its people but instead prioritizes ideological goals. Historically, Britain's large, centralised state functioned effectively because we had a homogenous, high-trust society.

But this foundation has eroded under decades of unchecked multiculturalism and mass immigration, driven by a left-leaning establishment that values "diversity" over cohesion.

The state, ideologically aligned with narratives of "decolonisation" and "abolishing whiteness," shields favoured communities while suppressing dissent through censorship and smear campaigns. Social structures that once protected society—chivalry, community spirit, and accountability—have been replaced by an overreaching state that uses its power to protect itself and its ideology, not its citizens.

This ideological capture mirrors past revolutions where socialists allied with incompatible forces to topple existing systems, only to face betrayal. The state's failure to address radicalization, enforce integration, and maintain borders while demonizing critics ensures the current trajectory worsens, leaving British people unprotected and alienated from their own country.