Topics

[Warning on websites offering fake royal titles and priesthoods for a price]

Warning on websites offering fake royal titles and priesthoods for a price

http://www.news.com.au/technology/warning-on-websites-offering-fake-royal-titles-and-priesthoods-for-a-price/story-e6frfro0-1226059291424

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/technology/warning-on-websites-offering-fake-royal-titles-and-priesthoods-for-a-price/story-e6frep1o-1226059206139

By Alex Dickinson From: The Courier-Mail May 20, 2011

Websites offer royal titles, priesthoods
Priesthoods free, royal titles $45 each
Want an instant degree? Just go online

MAKING friends and securing dinner reservations is never a problem when you're a Lord.

That's the promise websites are making to Australians eager to break into high society by buying everything from royal titles to priesthoods online.

As reported in The Courier-Mail yesterday, Australians are applying for jobs using dodgy degrees they can buy on the web in a matter of minutes for as little as $122. But the practice doesn't stop there. Priesthoods can be obtained for free, while lordships, knighthoods and countships go for $45 each.

The Universal Life Church Monastery, based in Seattle, says it has ordained more than 20 million ministers, [ULC sells their ministerial certificates to anyone who wants to purchase one. We do not. We only want competent, professional Creators as ministers for the Church of Creativity. ~ Cailen.] while British websites say they can make customers "Lords" of a "square foot of land in the Scottish highlands".

"You'll be astonished how other people can be so attentive and will bend over backwards to serve you if they are serving you as a Lord, Lady, Baron or other such noble title," touts one website. But the titles might not be worth the paper they are printed on.

British Earl Richard Bradford launched a website dedicated to naming and shaming sellers of fake titles.

"I will put it very simply: you cannot purchase a genuine British title, with one exception, the feudal title of a Scottish baron," Mr Bradford said.

"Scottish feudal baronies fetch a mighty price. The Barony of MacDonald was once up for sale at over $1 million."

A spokesman for the Queensland Office of Births, Deaths and Marriages said royal titles were not lodged with or were recognised by the office.

"It's also illegal to change your name to something like 'Lord' if it denotes a rank of some sort," the spokesman said.

A priesthood from the Universal Life Church will not allow you to be a marriage celebrant in Queensland. The position requires training and registration with the Federal Attorney-General's Department. [Same as a Minister for Creativity. See below for the different laws in the USA. ~ Cailen.]

Dr Jarrod Trevathan, deputy director of James Cook University's eResearch Centre, said titles bought online did not appear to have any legal or official standing.

"I wouldn't recommend that people use the title on official documents such as driver's licences or bank accounts despite the claims made on (some) web sites," Dr Trevathan said.

"These schemes seem to exhibit odd loop holes and convoluted legal definitions that might make them legitimate in a specific and extremely narrow context.

"However, you shouldn't rely on these in any legal capacity."


The Rights of Ministers.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Life_Church#Authority_to_solemnize_marriage_and_other_rites_of_the_church

A large number of people seeking ULC Ordination do so in order to be able to legally officiate at weddings or perform other spiritual rites. ... Some people living in remote areas also use their status as ordained ULC ministers to meet the marriage officiant needs of their communities.

Within the USA, all 50 states theoretically authorize ministers who are ordained and authorized by their church to officiate marriages. In most states, ordination as a minister is the only requirement for a minister to be able to officiate lawful weddings. Some states require additional documentation, such as a "letter of good standing" or that the minister present his or her credential of ordination and register. One state also requires that the minister must be a United States citizen, and some states specify that the minister must be at least 18 years of age (although this is probably a presumed requirement in all states, since the minister will attest to a legal document).

Some states do not even require actual ordination, but permit those who declare themselves to be ministers to officiate marriage. ULC ministers wishing to perform legal weddings should refer to the local authority in the

Outside the USA, some countries are very liberal in this regard. Japan, for example, will recognize anyone who claims him- or herself to be a minister, regardless of church affiliation. Many developing countries are also quite liberal in their restrictions and definitions.

On the other hand, several major countries are quite restrictive. In Canada, ULC ministers have been authorized to solemnize marriage only in a few local jurisdictions. In many other countries, ULC ministers have no authority to solemnize lawful marriage. Some ministers avoid this complication by meeting requirements to solemnize a civil ceremony, which might include being registered as a notary public or a justice of the peace. In some places, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, religion and government are one, and anyone caught promoting a religious practice outside of the government complex can be subjected to severe punishment.

In many countries, including much of continental Europe, Turkey, Japan and the countries of the former Soviet Union, only marriages performed by the state in a civil ceremony are recognised legally. It is customary for couples who wish a religious—or any other—ceremony to hold one separately from the civil wedding.

The Universal Life Church authorizes its ordained ministers to perform weddings, baptisms, and funerals. They may hold meetings and services. The church also allows its ministers to perform other rites and sacraments to fulfill the needs of the congregation. The church has a course which qualifies its ministers to provide religious counseling.

[The brain is just a computer, and there's no heaven for broken-down computers, says Stephen Hawking]

The brain is just a computer, and there's no heaven for broken-down computers, says Stephen Hawking

http://www.news.com.au/technology/there-is-no-heaven-but-im-not-afraid-to-die-says-scientist-stephen-hawking/story-e6frfro0-1226057428507

BRITISH scientist Stephen Hawking has branded heaven a "fairy story" for people afraid of the dark, in his latest dismissal of the concepts underpinning the world's religions.

The author of 1988 international best-seller A Brief History of Time said in an interview with The Guardian that his views were partly influenced by his battle with motor neurone disease.

"I have lived with the prospect of an early death for the last 49 years. I'm not afraid of death, but I'm in no hurry to die. I have so much I want to do first," he told the newspaper.

"I regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers — that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark."

Hawking rejected the notion of life beyond death and emphasised the need to fulfil our potential on Earth by making good use of our lives. In answer to a question on how we should live, he said, simply: "We should seek the greatest value of our action."

Read the full interview with The Guardian http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/may/15/stephen-hawking-interview-there-is-no-heaven?INTCMP=SRCH

['Black women are ugly' - Outrage at Satoshi Kanazawa's racist science blog on Psychology Today]

If it's racist to say Black women are ugly compared to Whites and Asians, why is it not racist to say that Black men are better looking than Whites or Asians?

'Black women are ugly' - Outrage at Satoshi Kanazawa's racist science blog on Psychology Today

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/black-women-are-ugly-outrage-at-satoshi-kanazawas-racist-science-blog-on-psychology-today/story-e6frg12c-1226058689530

"BLACK women are less attractive than white, Asian and Native American Women. And there's scientific proof."

Website Psychology Today has been accused of peddling racist, psuedo-science when it published the above claims this week in a blog by controversial evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa.

Kanazawa's post, which the website took down after a huge backlash, argued that black women were less physically attractive than other women and that it has something to do with testosterone and genetic mutations.

He wrote on Monday in his regular blog, The Scientific Fundamentalist: A Look at the Hard Truths About Human Nature:

"Black women are on average much heavier than nonblack women. However, this is not the reason black women are less physically attractive than nonblack women ...Because they have existed much longer in human evolutionary history, Africans have more mutations in their genomes than other races."

Miranda Kerr vs Naomi Nigger

Kanazawa, who teaches at the London School of Economics, attempted to justify his theory by dressing his post up with colourful bar graphs and lots of stats.

However, the entire study appears to be based on the perspectives and opinions of adult respondents, although Kanazawa reports his findings as objective facts.

Kanazawa's article caused a huge backlash and drew accusations that he and Psychology Today were peddling racist nonsense. At first Psychology Today tried editing the headline but then it took the post down.

The site's editor-in-chief, Kaja Perina, did not apologise for the post but put out this statement: "Our bloggers are credential[ed] social scientists and for this reason they are invited to post to the site on topics of their choosing. We in turn reserve the right to remove posts for any number of reasons."

Kanazawa has form. Other posts in his blog include: Are All Women Essentially Prostitutes?, If Beautiful People Have Daughters, Why Do Posh and Becks Have Three Sons? and More Intelligent People Are More Likely to Binge Drink and Get Drunk.

[Thursday, 19 May 2011Judgement Day pet care]

Thursday, 19 May 2011
Judgement Day pet care

WHEN judgment day comes — which some US Christian fundamentalists insist will happen on Saturday — have you thought about what you're going to do with the family dog and cat?

In 26 US states, you could have them rescued and adopted by enterprising atheists who have set up a business to care for the animal companions of any Christians who are selected to go to heaven when Jesus Christ comes back.

"You've committed your life to Jesus. You know you're saved. But when the Rapture comes, what's to become of your loving pets who are left behind?" Eternal Earth-Bound Pets says on its website, offering to "take that burden off your mind".

The post-doomsday pet rescue service already has 259 clients, who have paid $135 for the first pet and $US20 for each additional pet at the same address, to ensure the faithful animal companions are looked after and loved even when their Christian owners have gone to the other side.

All the rescuers are sworn atheists, which means they will definitely be left behind on Earth, ready to rescue pets after the Rapture, which one US Christian fundamentalist group has pencilled in for Saturday.

When judgment day happens, Eternal Earth-Bound Pets co-founder Bart Centre "will notify all of our rescuers to go into action and they will drive to the homes of anyone who's signed a contract with us, pick up their pets and take them home and adopt them as their own, keeping them happy and healthy for the rest of their lives.

"This will happen only if and when the Rapture happens. So we do not expect to have to do anything on Saturday," Centre said.

Contracts are good for 10 years, just in case the Mayan calendar prophesy, which predicts the world will end in December next year, comes true.

http://eternal-earthbound-pets.com

http://www.google.com/search?q=Judgement+Day+pet+care


Comment:

Now there's a good community service at a price for Creators to perform for our Christinsane Christian loonies brethren.

Pontifex Cambeul.

Most of the time I ignore or delete the Hate Mail, but on occasion one gives me a laugh.

FirstName: LOLA
LastName: PEPPERDEW
comments: You are a disgusting group of racist people. Oh and god doesn\'t exist.
email: railes@ymail.com

Apparently  this one feels the need to tell me that "god doesn't exist."   

[NER:]

http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&rh=n%3A283155%2Ck%3Aben%20klassen&page=1



NER: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0963609424/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-1&condition=all

WMB: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0317532790/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-2&condition=all

Rahowa: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0006EQ7Z2/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-3&condition=all

On the Brink: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0006F2H6O/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-12&condition=all

Klassen Letters 1: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B001EFPNA2/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-11&condition=all

AET: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0006F1CCO/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-7&condition=all

TTT: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B002KDNL92/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&qid=1305769106&sr=1-5&condition=all

LWB: http://www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/B0006ORTWW/ref=dp_olp_0?ie=UTF8&redirect=true&condition=all

Whites are abandoning Massachusetts cities at a rapid clip, continuing well-worn paths to the suburbs or out of state, according to new demographic data from the US census.

In Lawrence, the white population plummeted by more than one-third over the past decade, while Chelsea's dropped 34 percent. Springfield lost some 17,000 white residents, Brockton and Worcester dropped more than 14,000, while Lynn lost 12,600.

Overall, 43 of 45 large communities examined by the Globe saw declines in white population, with only suburban Peabody and Franklin countering the trend. Fourteen — including Everett, Lowell, Malden, and Watertown — dropped by double digits.

"It continues to be a challenge for cities to hold middle-class families,'' said Joseph C. O'Brien, the mayor of Worcester, who said schools continue to be the "biggest driver'' of white flight to the suburbs. In Fall River and Holyoke, for example, where the state is threatening to take over the schools if they do not improve, the white population fell off considerably.

O'Brien noted that strong rates of immigration allowed the city to grow briskly in recent years, in keeping with his city's history of drawing newcomers in search of a new life.

"The story really hasn't changed,'' he said. "The only thing that's changed is where they come from.''
In all, the communities examined by the Globe lost 190,000 white residents, or 9 percent, even as surging numbers of minorities in many cases boosted their overall populations. For example, the state's five largest cities — Boston, Worcester, Springfield, Lowell, and Cambridge — all grew despite losing whites, underlining the relative growth of minorities compared with whites.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/world/queen-elizabeth-ii-lays-wreath-for-dead-irish-republicans-at-memorial-service/story-e6frea8l-1226057927905

At the Garden of Remembrance - one of the most sensitive moments of the trip - she stood with head bowed during a minute's silence at the memorial for those who died fighting for Irish freedom. The army band played God Save the Queen along with the Irish national anthem.

Outside, protesters torched the flags of Britain and Northern Ireland. They carried banners from various groups, including Sinn Fein, the political wing of the now-defunct Irish Republican Army (IRA), and the hardline republican 32 County Sovereignty Movement.

[BBC Civilisation 11of13 The Worship of Nature]

BBC Civilisation 11of13 The Worship of Nature (It's an arts programme)

Pick your own download or http://eztv.it or direct below.

http://torrent.zoink.it/BBC.Civilisation.11of13.The.Worship.of.Nature.x264.AC3.HDTV.[MVGroup.org].torrent


Brother Cochran, I thought you might be especially interested in this.

@Cailen.

[ON THE eve of the election which could change the UK electoral process, one of Britain's most prominent black politicians is urging the community to consider voting yes to the AV (Alternative Voting) system.]

ON THE eve of the election which could change the UK electoral process, one of Britain's most prominent black politicians is urging the community to consider voting yes to the AV (Alternative Voting) system.

Voters will head to the polling booths on Thursday, May 5, to choose either the current First Past the Post system or AV – proposed by the Liberal Democrats as part of their campaign for electoral reform.

Labour Nigger for Tottenham, David Lammy, shares his views on why he will be choosing to vote in favour of AV.
"The BNP wants your vote next Thursday. In the referendum on how MPs are elected, Nick Griffin's party is fighting hard to stop a system that puts power with the mainstream majority.

This is how the BNP's deputy chairman Simon Darby puts it, "We are never going to get our feet under the table under the AV system." Vote yes and together we can shut the BNP [read majority rule/White people] out forever.

The alternative vote makes it harder for any party to win with an extremist message that appeals only to a small hardcore of voters. It forces politicians to broaden their appeal because more people's votes count. The BNP know that under first past the post all they have to do is scrape together 25 or 30% of the vote in a divided race: under AV they could never win the majority support they would need.
http://www.voice-online.co.uk/content.php?show=19546


Under the A.V. process, seen by enthusiasts and detractors alike as a first step toward proportional representation, voters rank all candidates for a parliamentary seat in order of preference, setting off a rolling recount if no candidate gains 50 percent on the first count of first choices.

In each recount, the candidate with the lowest vote is eliminated and his or her backers' second choices are redistributed, until one candidate reaches 50 percent and is declared the winner.

Advocates of the existing system often say that allowing the vote leader to win outright is more likely to produce strong governments than the A.V. system is, since it distributes seats more evenly across the political spectrum and makes clear-majority victories by single parties harder to achieve.
That is a point readily conceded by supporters of the proposed alternate vote system, who favor it at least in part because it would be likelier to lead to more coalition governments of the kind common in the countries of Continental Europe that have adopted various forms of proportional representation.

Mr. Cameron's Conservative Party has strongly opposed the proposed new system, calling it expensive, complex and an invitation to allowing minority parties, and even extremist groups, to gain a stronger foothold in government. The opposition Labour Party, meanwhile, is deeply split on the issue, with its leader, Ed Miliband, campaigning for it. But many senior Labour figures have aligned with the Conservatives in urging a "no" vote, saying that the existing system has served Britain well.
http://www.nytimes.com/glogin?URI=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/02/world/europe/02britain.html&OQ=_rQ3D1Q26refQ3Deurope&OP=1437112fQ2F-sSQ5E-aQ22uHQ3BQ22Q22Q3DQ7D-Q7Dbll-bj-bQ7D-sQ22Q3BNa-SQ2FQ3BQ22PS-bQ7DQ5EQ3BXQ3DQ23XtTMQ3DwN


British Liberals Lose, Scottish Nationalists Gain

A series of local, regional and national votes on Thursday re-drew much of the political map here, punishing the Liberal Democrats, the junior partners in the coalition government, and boosting the Scottish National Party, which has long advocated a referendum on independence from Britain, according to preliminary results released on Friday.

The main national focus of the voting had been a referendum on a proposal that would change how members of Parliament are elected, potentially increasing the electoral chances of parties that are usually in the minority.
The measure has been championed by the Liberal Democrats, who until last year had spent a lifetime out of power, chafing at rules seemingly designed to keep them there. But voters also elected members for regional assembles in Wales and Scotland, and local government in England.

The results, thus, were driven by issues ranging from local concerns to the future of the national government.
News reports based on opinion surveys said the voters may have rejected the proposal for electoral reform, offering the Liberal Democrats a further humiliating setback after they lost control of important local councils in northern cities.

Political analysts ascribed the Liberal Democrats' losses to the party's association with the government's unpopular austerity measures, including a huge hike in college tuition that alienated many of the same Liberal Democrat supporters as increased the party's representation in Parliament in national elections a year ago, enabling it to act as kingmaker in forming the coalition.

"We are clearly getting the brunt of the blame," said Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat leader, on Friday.
Pre-election polls had predicted a resounding defeat for the proposal to do away with the current electoral system, in which the candidate with the most votes wins the seat — even if the candidate fails to win a majority of votes. Under the proposed system, voters would rank the candidates for a seat in order of preference, setting off a rolling recount until one candidate wins more than 50 percent.

The "alternative vote," or A.V., is already used in Australia and some other places. Its proponents argue that it would make voting much fairer, giving parties whose support is widespread but not concentrated in particular areas a better chance of winning more seats while making it harder for big parties to achieve clear-majority victories that usually allow them to govern without partners.

Senior Liberal Democrats – who had led the campaign for the Alternative Vote – conceded defeat and acknowledged that their long-cherished dream of electoral reform is now off the agenda at least until the end of the Parliament.

The rejection of AV, under which voters rank candidates in numerical order, was a further humiliation for Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, for whom a referendum on voting reform was his main prize in negotiations to form a coalition last year.

But prominent Lib Dems insisted that, despite the setback on electoral reform and the party's disastrous showing in elections to English councils, the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly, Mr Clegg's position was safe and the coalition would survive.

After 296 of the 440 referendum declarations, the No campaign had 68.56% of the vote against 31.44% for Yes. Only the inner London boroughs of Islington, Haringey, Camden and Lambeth, the city of Cambridge and Glasgow Kelvin had backed AV.

Liberal Democrat Cabinet minister Chris Huhne accepted that there would be no further attempt to introduce voting reform during this Parliament and that it was "over" for the Alternative Vote.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/av/uk-says-a-resounding-no-to-av-2280159.html


Comment:

The most recent Federal Election in Australia found that the Labor Party did not have the required amount of votes to take the reins of power, so they made a deal with the Greens, Democrats and some independents to give their vote - whether their electorate wanted it or not (and often going against their electorate) - to the Labor Party. The end result is that because of backroom deals an unelected government is now ruling Australia. If the Alternative Voting system goes into effect in the UK, then even if the BNP gets the overwhelming majority of votes, a coalition of Muds, Marxists and Liberals will see the BNP wiped off the political map. And Britain, like Australia, will have minority rule as the governing body.

Pontifex Cambeul.

[Former Prime Minister and current Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd:]

Former Prime Minister and current Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd:

Australian JOG Foreign Policy: Building mosques in Afghanistan at the Australian tax payer's expense to promote Islam.

"Similarly in Afghanistan where we're building schools, we're building health clinics, roads, mosques to support local community development and economic vibrancy as well ... "
http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2011/s3206963.htm



From the Department of Defence website:

"The task force is there to conduct repairs and maintenance on the villager's mosque."
http://www.defence.gov.au/opex/global/opslipper/images/gallery/20070104/index.htm



From KRudd's press conference in Washington yesterday:

"We even opened our first Australian government-funded mosque in the Tora Valley..."
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/foreign-minister-kevin-rudd-says-australia-to-remain-in-afghanistan/story-fn8ljzlv-1226048831195

George Carlin on Religion and God

George Carlin The Ten Commandments Broken Down

YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS - George Carlin

[Donald Trump detectives delve into President Barack Obama's birth]

Donald Trump detectives delve into President Barack Obama's birth
Brad Norington, Washington correspondent From:The Australian April 09, 2011

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/donald-trump-detectives-delve-into-president-barack-obamas-birth/story-e6frg6so-1226036219653

DONALD Trump has ruffled political feathers after confirming he has sent private detectives to Hawaii to investigate if Barack Obama was born in the US.

The real estate billionaire turned reality TV host yesterday fuelled a long-running conspiracy theory, saying he had doubts about the President's birthplace.

Mr Trump's views would not normally matter in American politics, but he is suddenly figuring as a possible presidential contender in next year's election.

He came from nowhere last month to rank fifth in a CNN poll of potential Republican Party candidates, scoring 10 per cent of support among voters surveyed.

In a new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, Mr Trump shared second place with former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, both scoring 17 per cent.

The poll's outright leader with 21 per cent was former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, who has been campaigning unofficially for months.

It is not clear if Mr Trump is seriously interested in running for president or is merely happy to attract attention. He said he would make a decision by June.

The billionaire's confirmation that he had hired investigators to study the President's background came in the same week that Mr Obama announced his re-election campaign.

Questions about Mr Obama's birthplace revive old rumours that the president was born in Kenya, not Hawaii.

During the 2008 election campaign, Mr Obama's campaign team released a copy of his birth certificate issued by the Hawaii Department of Health showing that he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961.

But a group known as "birthers" has continued to cast doubt about the document's authenticity, claiming Mr Obama is ineligible for office under a constitutional requirement that the president must be born in the US.

Speaking on NBC News, Mr Trump claimed Mr Obama's birth certificate was potentially one of the biggest scams in political history.

"His grandmother in Kenya said he was born in Kenya, and she witnessed the birth," he said.

Critics of Mr Trump say he has false information based on the words of Mr Obama's step-grandmother, who was mistranslated in a phone interview.



Obongo must be a Natural Born Citizen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/'Natural_Born_Citizen'_clause_of_the_U.S._Constitution

[To Mr Dylan Bird,]

This letter is posted here for general discussion. If you wish to publicly express your disgust as I have or support for the fight against these overblown school Marxists, you may do so on my website at https://sacreator.com/open-letter-to-the-institute-of-postcolonial-studies. Remember, when in public, keep it nice.




To the Institute of Postcolonial Studies
Tel: + 61 3 9329 6381
Fax: + 61 3 9328 3131
Email: postcol@netspace.net.au
Website: http://ipcs.org.au

78-80 Curzon Street
North Melbourne, 3051
Victoria, AUSTRALIA

To Mr Dylan Bird,

Your institute is an institute of hatred with contempt for reality. On the one hand you treat the biological separation of humanity into different races as a myth, and even go as far as to preach that it is society and culture that decide whether a person is indigenous to this country. And yet, you still choose to treat colonialism and White people with disrespect on every turn. Your form of Aboriginality is nothing less than Indigenous Nationalism. i.e. Black Supremacism in an attempt to exterminate White people through their assimilation into indigenous Australian culture and society. That is by definition, genocide.

I, and millions of others, view your behaviour with contempt. We as White Australians will not be joining your Aboriginal Nation of Indigenous Overlords that you seem to propose. Instead, we will steadfastly maintain our White Australian identity, culture, race and society in the face of your postcolonial racism.

Furthermore, there are many Indigenous Australians who feel the same. They are proud of their Aboriginality and dismiss the idea of marrying outside their race. Nevermind accepting a White man or woman as an Indigenous Australian, simply because he or she self identifies as indigenous to this nation. And I for one respect them for their stance. You Sir, deserve no such respect. If you are a White man, then you are a traitor to your race – and the same can be said if you do indeed have any Aboriginal heritage. Your views are an insult to both Aboriginal and White Australians, and the day that your Institute of Postcolonial Studies is closed down, the better for all Australians.

Yours Sincerely,

Reverend Cailen Cambeul,
Church of Creativity.
PM@creativityalliance.com
https://creativityalliance.com




See https://sacreator.com/open-letter-to-the-institute-of-postcolonial-studies for more information.

[Port Augusta Mayor's outburst 'incites violence']

Port Augusta Mayor's outburst 'incites violence'

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/ipad/port-augusta-mayors-outburst-incites-violence/story-fn6bqphm-1226033582403

Political Reporter Daniel Wills From:The Advertiser April 05, 2011

ABORIGINAL Affairs Minister Grace Portolesi says Port Augusta Mayor Joy Baluch will incite violence by pledging to release dogs on Aborigines.

The Advertiser yesterday reported Ms Baluch's vow to "arrange merry hell" and direct police and dogs to clear groups from Port Augusta public spaces if they migrated from the Northern Territory to Port Augusta. [These are the type of wild muds that openly defecate in the streets https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php?topic=5781.0 ~ Cailen.]

Ms Portolesi said the State Government was preparing to use transitional housing as a contingency should groups fleeing the NT arrive in South Australia.

Ms Portolesi said Ms Baluch's comments set all their work back.

"Apart from the fact the comments are deeply offensive, they're deeply unhelpful," she said yesterday.

"When you have a mayor saying: `We're going to set the dogs on you', what kind of reputation does that give our state? A very bad one."

A transitional accommodation centre in Port Augusta was readied to accept residents should there be demand, she said.

"If people decided to come to SA, which they're perfectly entitled to do because this isn't South Africa [that's because they are not entitled to chop up White farmers with their machetes and seize the land here yet ~ Cailen], there is a transitional accommodation centre there," Ms Portolesi said.

"We're talking about a situation which hasn't even occurred yet. We have a response ready to go."

Original Story:
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/pot-augusta-mayor-joy-baluchs-threat-to-interstate-aboriginal-campers-id-set-the-dogs-on-em/story-e6frea6u-1226032896269

Most of the comments for Adelaide are positive.

Joy Baluch of Port Augusta Posted at 2:50 PM April 04, 2011

Reply to Neil Gillsepie....You know full well from our long standing working relationship that the comment was as usual taken out of context to sell papers.

Neil E Gillespie of Adelaide Posted at 12:27 PM April 04, 2011

It is disappointing that a community leader such as the Mayor of Port Augusta would make such inflammatory and inappropriate comments. Ms Baluch making such public comments only reinforces the worsening international reputation of Australia. Ms Baluch should be discussing her concerns with the State and Territory Govts instead of pursuing attention. Her approach is clearly contrary to our international obligations as provided by various international declarations and covenants. This is what is wrong with Australia; ill-advised community leaders making rash and inappropriate comment.

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/national/ill-set-dogs-on-aboriginal-campers-says-mayor-of-port-augusta-south-australia/story-e6freooo-1226033736095

Most of the comments for Brisbane are negative, but there are still a few positive comments sneaking through.

Paul of Brisbane Posted at 8:59 AM Today

Fair enough.... they're vagrants. I guarantee the people harping on about human rights, racism and other rubbish would not want these freeloaders camping on their nature strip.

[More at:]

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/04/01/title-documents-homes-contain-racist-language

The notion of "whites only" accommodations and "separate but equal" may seem like something from the distant past, but such racially segregationist language is still on the books in one California county.

For Sacramento County residents living in some neighborhoods, the title documents to their properties still contain racist regulations, such as "No persons of any race other than white or Caucasian shall use..."

That language can be found in the "Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions" documents for an unknown number of homes in the county.

In another example, an exception was made for tenants using retail space, saying "persons of the Japanese or Chinese race" are allowed to use it.

Fox 40, which made the discovery, found that most clauses regarding employment also made exceptions for, "domestic servants of employees."

The language is a holdover from an earlier era, not a new campaign of discrimination, but since such terminology is now illegal, Fox 40 asked Sacramento County Clerk/Recorder Craig Kramer it still exists on legal documents.

For a homeowner to change the language and make the document legal, Kramer said, "we have to go to our counsel – our attorney – and have them verify the document to make certain there's nothing else being stricken from it. Because of that, it takes some time."

He said that there was no way to predict the number of homes that still have documents with such language, but he noted that a state law in 2006 made changing the title documents easier.

Since then only 12 homeowners have actually made the change.

More at: http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-fox40-investigation-racist-language-found-in-current-home-title-documents-20110401,0,2761955.story


Comment:

It's good that such a large amount of White home owners have not bothered to make the changes required by another nonsensical law.

Only a complete idiot would go out of their way to change the language in home ownership documents at their own expense. If the JOG want it done, they can do it themselves. Apart from that, what's the next idiotic law going to be? If it is not in Spanish, it is not a legal document? Or how about orders that the property is only suitable for Mestizos, and Whites are banished from the premises? Don't be surprised if either or both come to pass as what is racist for Whites is empowering and promoting equality for non-Whites.

Pontifex Cambeul.

[Curtin University to review visa language testing centre after bribes evidence]

Curtin University to review visa language testing centre after bribes evidence

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/curtin-bribe-allegations-grow/story-e6frg143-1226029528599?from=public_rss

CURTIN University is reviewing its involvement in providing IELTS English competency testing in light of evidence presented at a recent Corruption and Crime Commission hearing.

The state's Corruption and Crime Commission (CCC) is investigating allegations a staff member at the university was bribed to falsify results of English-language competency tests.

Applicants for permanent residency and work or students' visas must prove their competence under the International English Testing System (IELTS), which is relied upon by the Department of Immigration.

Keith Low, who came from Malaysia to Australia in 1999 as an international student, was acting coordinator of the IELTS at Curtin between February 2009 and July 2010.

In evidence last week, the hearing Mr Low agreed to falsify the test results of Vishnal Pandya in mid 2009 in exchange for money, with Mr Kader acting as a middle man.

Between March and June 2010, Mr Low received several cash payments of $1000 and $3000 from visa applicants, as well one larger sum of $7000.

He said he was unsure how much money he had made through the operation, but bank statements suggest it was more than $30,000. [more ...]

[A COURT has ordered the race hate trial of Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders to go ahead.]

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/court-orders-trial-of-dutch-anti-islam-mp/story-e6frea73-1226030959363

A COURT has ordered the race hate trial of Dutch anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders to go ahead.

The trial opened in October last year, but was abruptly halted three weeks later when the judges trying him were ordered to step down by a panel of their peers who upheld the politician's claims of bias.

But the Amsterdam court today dismissed the MP's objections that the court and prosecutors were not competent to try him because the alleged offenses were not committed in Amsterdam.

"The trial will continue," chief judge Marcel van Oosten told the court.

Wilders, 47, faces five counts of giving offence to Muslims and of inciting hatred against Muslims and people of non-Western immigrant origin, particularly Moroccans, in numerous public statements since October 2006.

Wilders has called Islam "fascist", likened the Koran to Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and campaigned for a ban on the burqa and the building of new mosques in the Netherlands.

He shot to international notoriety in 2008 with the release of his short film, Fitna, which mixes Koranic verses with footage of extremist attacks.

Geert Wilders Speaks: Anti-Koran Film "Fitna" (Part 1 of 2)

Wilders lawyers claimed that the film was released on the Internet in the US and was not released in Amsterdam but van Oosten said it was aimed at a Dutch audience.

"The film is, when you take into account its contents and sub-titles in the Dutch language, destined for a Dutch audience," he told the court.

The MP, whose Party for Freedom gives parliamentary support to a right-leaning coalition, faces up to a year in jail or a $10,440 fine for comments made in his campaign to "stop the Islamisation of the Netherlands".

L'Écosse entonne son premier "Flowers of Scotland"

[Australia (and the US) not multicultural, says Le Pen]

Australia (and the US) not multicultural, says Le Pen
Paola Totaro
March 12, 2011

http://www.smh.com.au/world/australia-not-multicultural-says-le-pen-20110311-1br50.html

PARIS: The leader of the French National Front, Marine Le Pen, has ridiculed descriptions of the US and Australia as ''multicultural''.

In an interview with the Herald in Paris, Ms Le Pen - whose popularity has eclipsed that of the President, Nicolas Sarkozy - argued that true multiculturalism cannot work and, where it has existed, it ended in war.

''The only places where real multiculturalism existed ... the Balkans, Lebanon ... it ended up in conflict,'' she said. ''In France when people talk about multiculturalism, it is most often in reference to the United States. But I believe that is false. The United States is not a multicultural society.
Advertisement: Story continues below

''In reality it is uni-cultural - it has one culture, it is a culture in which each citizen has a unique relationship with the American nation. Isn't it the same in Australia? This ... requires the submission by the individual [to] a series of values which must be accepted by everybody.''

Ms Le Pen, a 42-year-old criminal lawyer, said multiculturalist policies were created by Anglo-Saxon politicians to help them define - and capture - ethnic communities into easy voting blocs.

She said that this approach ''benefits the politicians who use the communities ... but ultimately it erodes the interest of the nation as a whole.

''This model of multiculturalism is one which other countries, including the Anglo-Saxon nations, are now moving away from. Look at what David Cameron has said recently, see what Mrs Merkel in Germany says.''

Ms Le Pen, the youngest daughter of the notorious neo-fascist, Jean-Marie, has become a media darling in France, refashioning the party created by her father 40 years ago from a blatantly racist organisation into a hybrid of far-left, anti-big-business, anti-privatisation patriots mixed with a far-right anti-globalisation and anti-immigration bloc.

Harnessing post-credit-crunch insecurity amid rising unemployment, she has forced a law-and-order and anti-immigration auction that has in turn forced Mr Sarkozy so far to the right that he has alienated his centre-right supporters.

She said Australia appeared to have avoided the immigration pitfalls faced by France, Italy and other European nations by carefully safeguarding immigration numbers.

Much of France's problems, she said, lay with the erosion of the ''long and noble'' tradition of post-colonial assimilation, which ''feeble, slack'' French governments allowed to be watered down into an ''Anglo-Saxon model'' of integration.

''Assimilation is a concept which says to those who arrive that you must live and comply by the ways of life and traditions of the country to which you have come.

''We have forgotten this tradition and have suggested to the new arrivals that they can keep their way of life, their traditions.

''We have arrived now to a situation of multiculturalism which is the most dangerous: it is a coexistence which is not at all peaceful, and a number of communities have withdrawn and live unto themselves.''

Ms Le Pen also railed against being caricatured overseas as ''extreme right'' and being branded a racist for questioning multiculturalism.

''I believe strongly that it is time that we question the politicians' rhetoric that if you question immigration it means you are a racist. This is not true. Immigration is a worldwide problem. It is a phenomenon that transcends nations. It is an economic issue with massive social implications.

''Surely, you can conclude and debate that the consequences of migration can sometimes be bad for your country without blaming immigrants or bear a grudge against migrants.''

[Islamists want proof from Tony Abbott]

Note: At the time, Abbott was the leader of the opposition party. Shortly after that, he was elected Prime Minister and then later tossed out and replaced by Jewish Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull.


Islamists want proof from Tony Abbott

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/islamists-want-proof-from-tony-abbott/story-e6frea73-1226019586359

THE hardline Islamist group Hizb Ut-Tahrir has challenged Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott to substantiate claims the group has called for the killing of Jews.

Earlier this week, Mr Abbott delivered a speech where he declared Hizb Ut-Tahrir a part of the "extremism" that so worried the west.

He told the United Israel Appeal dinner on Tuesday that Hizb Ut-Tahrir leaders had gone on the public record calling for the killing of Jewish people.

In a lengthy speech focusing on Jewish tradition, the one-time seminarian said all Australians were "in a sense" Jews.

"Abraham, Moses and David may not be everyone's fathers in faith but certainly they are all our fathers in culture."

Hizb Ut-Tahrir, a group that has long called for the creation of an Islamic caliphate, rejected the claims.

"Mr Abbott's assertion against Hizb ut-Tahrir is an outright fabrication," spokesman Uthman Badar said.

"No one from Hizb ut-Tahrir has called for the killing of Jewish people.

"We challenge Mr Abbott to substantiate this allegation."


Comment:

According to an article in the Adelaide Advertiser, leader of the Opposition (Australian Liberal Party) Tony Abbot, recently told the United Israel Appeal in a lengthy speech focussing on Jewish tradition that all Australians are "in a sense" Jews.

"Abraham, Moses and David may not be everyone's fathers in faith but certainly they are all our fathers in culture," said Mr Abbott.

Mr Abbott, For your information the mythical Abraham, Moses and David are not my fathers in faith or culture, anymore than they were my fathers in ethnicity. Nor did the stories of these mythical patriarchs of Judaism, Islam and Christian zealots like yourself, contain moral values equal with that which I and most Australians live by today.

Abraham was an infanticidal pimp.

Moses was a genocidal magician.

David was a bandit chief turned king who ended his life as a womanising, adulterous murderer.

Who in their right mind that is not a Jew, would want to link themselves in any way at all to such textbook scoundrels? Mr Abbott, I am not a Jew. Next election, I will be voting for Australia First.

@Cailen.

For more information on Jewish bible hoaxes, see Chapter 10 of Nature's Eternal Religion https://creativityalliance.com/eBook-BenKlassen-Nature'sEternalReligion.pdf.

[@Cailen.]

Extend the following article from pure likes and dislikes into racial preferences and we see the built in mechanism that nature has supplied us with to keep to keep the different races and species separate and pure. Taking it one step further, our Love and Hate instincts are built into our DNA. Unless you are born as an abomination of nature, you are born heterosexual and racist. It's pure genetics.

@Cailen.

Gene magnetism
Nicky Phillips March 10, 2011

http://www.smh.com.au/world/science/gene-magnetism-20110309-1bnun.html

Your chances of being drawn to or repelled by someone may be determined by your DNA, writes Nicky Phillips.

Have you ever met someone you instantly disliked?

By most measures the two of you should have been great friends: you may have lived in the same suburb, known the same people, or even shared a love of some obscure 1970s punk-rock band.

But for some inexplicable reason, after knowing them for less than half an hour, you could not stand the sight of them.
Advertisement: Story continues below

The reason for such disdain - or the opposite effect, where you instantly click with someone - could lie in your genes.

The idea that friendship may have a genetic basis came to a geneticist at the University of California, San Diego, Professor James Fowler, after he wrote a book on the power of social networks.

He already knew that friend networks influenced a person's health. If your best mate becomes obese it increases your chance of becoming obese by 57 per cent.

But could the way humans naturally form clans, partnerships, teams and even gangs be, in part, written in our biology?

An intriguing clue emerged when he found identical twins have more closely connected friend networks than non-identical twins.

To Fowler this was the first sign that friends not only share likes and dislikes but could resemble each other on a genetic level.

''This was a step towards understanding the science of human chemistry - the idea that you might click with somebody as a consequence of biological similarities or differences,'' he says.

Fowler and his colleagues used data from two long-running epidemiological studies to compare the likelihood that friends shared similar genomes.

The group looked at the gene DRD2, which has been linked to alcoholism, and found friends were more likely to have the same version of the gene.

This positive correlation makes sense when you think about it, says Fowler, a professor of medical genetics.

''Suppose you are choosing other people to drink with. You don't want to hang out with teetotallers so you select friends who are like you,'' he says.

But Fowler could not be sure these people were choosing their friends based on a subtle influence of their genes or if they just happened to drink at the same place, at the same time.

''With positive correlation we can't rule out one of those two possibilities,'' says Fowler, who has the version of the DRD2 gene linked to alcoholism.

When the group studied another gene, CYP2A6, which some studies have shown is linked to openness, they found the opposite effect. People who had one version of the gene were more likely to be friends with people who had the opposite genotype.

In this case, Fowler could rule out the environmental influence.

It is not going to be the case that a person with one version of the genotype and their friend with a different version of the genotype are going to be drawn to the same environment, he says.

''For that outcome it is more likely it is a consequence of friendship choice.''

The group compared another four genes. Three had no association and one appeared to have a slight correlation among friends.

While the result appears to be small, it is significant.

He expects further studies that look at the entire genome will uncover dozens, possibly hundreds, of other markers that show signs of correlation among friends.

The results are also supported by Fowler's earlier research that found identical twins had more similar social networks than fraternal twins.

This showed that genes play a role in influencing how many friends you have and even if two of your friends are friends with one another.

''Genes affect how social we are and how likely we are to try to introduce our friends,'' says Fowler, whose findings were published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The friends we get introduced to can have a bigger effect on our biology than many people realise.

For a start, your friends can make you overweight. And not just your own friends but your friends' friends' friends.

Fowler and a long-term colleague, Nicholas Christakis, made this finding when they started to investigate whether social networks could influence certain health conditions.

From detailed data held by the Framingham Heart Study, an epidemiological study that has followed a group of people, their friends and their families for more than 50 years, the pair found obesity spreads by up to three degrees of separation.

''So if your friend is obese then it increases the likelihood that you will be obese by about 40 per cent. If your friend's friend is obese it increases your likelihood of being obese by 20 per cent. And if your friend's friend's friend is obese it increases your chance by 10 per cent,'' Fowler says.

He gives two possible explanations for why overweight friends seem to cluster together. It could be that people are choosing to be friends with people who are like them.

''Normal-weight people are choosing other normal-weight people to be friends with,'' he says.

Or it could be that friends are exposed to similar environments.

''So if a gym opens up down the street from you and your best friend, you may not even talk about it but each of you independently join the gym and you both lose some weight, so it looks like your weight is going up and down together when really you just live in the same environment,'' he says.

But what Fowler and Christakis, a professor of medicine at Harvard University, really wanted to know was if the obesity epidemic could be an epidemic that spreads from person to person like the flu does.

They went back to the Framingham Heart Study data.

With records collected for more than 30 years, they were able to model how people form friendships in the first place.

They used this to determine a person's risk of becoming obese if their friend does.

''If the person you named as a friend became obese, it increased the chance that you would become obese in the next two to four years by 57 per cent,'' Fowler says.

The finding shocked the researchers who then decided to reverse the situation. If a person named you as a friend but you didn't name them would their weight have an influence on yours?

Apparently not.

A person is only influenced by the weight of someone they consider a friend.

''Now we have evidence that this isn't about the gym opening up down the street from the two of you, because if that was the case then you should be just as affected by the people who name you as a friend as you are by the people you name as a friend,'' Fowler says.

''There is directionality. [Obesity] is spreading from one person to another.''

Fowler admits there could be other explanations for this phenomenon.

''But for these really important health behaviours it really is a story of birds of a feather flock together,'' he says.

And now that Fowler has found genes are linked among friends he would not be surprised if certain genes known to influence obesity are also shared among mates.

From an evolutionary perspective, there are several advantages for friends to share similar or complementary genotypes.

If genes are anything like new technology, then mass adoption is key.

''If you are the only person in the world with a fax it is going to do you no good, but if your friend has one you can use it,'' he says.

The utility of the fax machine grows exponentially with an increasing uptake. Perhaps genes work in a similar way.

For example, if an early human developed a genetic mutation that suddenly allowed them to speak or understand language it would be of no use if other people didn't have the same genotype.

''Things that we attribute to environmental influences might instead be genetic influences,'' he says.

The idea that friendships have a biological basis has been around for some time. The British anthropologist Robin Dunbar says humans have larger brains primarily to deal with living in larger groups, a trend that developed in our primate ancestors.

For them, living with others provided protection.

But it meant the species had to develop the mental capacity to keep track of multiple individuals.

As a result, human beings can not only understand the direct relationships they have with other people but the relationships those people have with one another.

''When you are making decisions about what to do with Jane, in part you also have to think about what Jane's relationship is with Sally,'' Fowler says.

[There's nothing Royal about Prince Andrew]

There's nothing Royal about Prince Andrew

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/people/refuses-to-listen-royal-familys-dismay-at-prince-andrew-20110309-1bneq.html

Members of the Royal family have expressed "dismay" at the Duke of York's friendship with a convicted paedophile.

A well-placed source has disclosed that there has been "concern" for at least two years that the Duke's choice of company would "blow up" and embarrass the Royal household.

The Duke's sale of his former home, Sunninghill Park, to a Kazakh billionaire for $4.8 million above the asking price in 2007 also "raised eyebrows" in the royal palaces but the Duke "refuses to listen" to advice, it is claimed.

The Duke's sale of his former home, Sunninghill Park, to a Kazakh billionaire for $4.8 million above the asking price in 2007 also "raised eyebrows" in the royal palaces but the Duke "refuses to listen" to advice, it is claimed.

Jeffrey Epstein: Disgraced financier and paedophile Kike. The Duke has been under intense pressure ever since a photograph of him with his arm around Epstein's 17 year-old "personal masseuse", who claimed she was groomed for under-age sex by the billionaire, was published more than a week ago.

Goga Ashkenazi: The Duke's close friend from Kazakh, who reportedly helped him sell Sunninghill. Miss Ashkenazi, who was introduced to Queen Elizabeth when she was a guest of the Duke in the royal box at Ascot in 2007, told the London Evening Standard about the Duke's fears for the future of his job.

[A drink with an extra twist: bizarre claims in Sydney Water legal case]

A drink with an extra twist: bizarre claims in Sydney Water legal case
Louise Hall March 8, 2011

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/water-issues/a-drink-with-an-extra-twist-bizarre-claims-in-sydney-water-legal-case-20110307-1bl9m.html

Paul Makucha ... "I'm terrified of the Freemasons." Photo: Dean Sewell

THE entrepreneur who plans to bottle and market Sydney water internationally attempted yesterday to have a Supreme Court trial judge disqualified, on the grounds the judge refused to say if he was Jewish or a Freemason.

Paul Makucha is being sued by Sydney Water Corporation for $293,000 it says was incorrectly paid to him and his various companies in a scheme concocted by Mr Makucha and a former senior executive, Edward Harvey.

Mr Makucha claims he owns the intellectual property for the marketing and selling of bottled water under the name Sydney Water because the trademark did not extend that far. He told the court intellectual property was not recognised under Jewish law and requested ''that any judge that is Jewish ... not hear this case because they may be influenced by religious beliefs regarding intellectual property''.

He also said the NSW Treasurer, Eric Roozendaal, one of the two shareholding ministers in Sydney Water, had used masonic code in a picture published in the Herald in January because his ''eyes were looking up - that's an imitation of Jesus - it's a masonic code''.

''I'm terrified of the Freemasons'' because ''they must conceal the crimes of their brother masons'', Mr Makucha said.

Justice John Sackar refused to answer if he was Jewish or a Freemason and said he would not stand down from the case.

''No aspect of Jewish law applies in this case. I have no idea what relevance it has to this case,'' Justice Sackar said.

In its statement of claim, Sydney Water says Mr Harvey had no authority to deal with intellectual property belonging to it.

Mr Makucha said he will continue his application to register the trademark Sydney Water with IP Australia unless restrained by the court.

The hearing continues.

[US Jewish groups oppose circumcision ban]

US Jewish groups oppose circumcision ban

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/us-jewish-groups-oppose-circumcision-ban/story-e6frea7u-1226016655316

JEWISH groups and others are up at arms over an attempt to outlaw male circumcision in San Francisco by putting the issue to a popular vote.

Self-described "intactivist" Lloyd Schofield has been collecting signatures for a voter initiative that would criminalise infant circumcision in the Californian city.

After two months of collecting names, he claims to be more than half way toward getting the 7168 signatures he needs by late April to put the matter on the November ballot.

Schofield and a growing community of anti-circumcision activists say that infants should not be forced to participate in what is essentially culturally accepted genital mutilation.

They claim that the procedure can cause health risks and diminished sexual function and compare it to the clitoridectomies performed on girls in parts of Africa.

"This is a human rights issue," he said. "What you're doing is you're taking an infant and removing the most sensitive part of their body."

Jewish organisations have pledged to fight the measure should it be placed on the ballot. Anti-Defamation League director Daniel Sandman called Schofield's effort discriminatory and misguided.

"This is hurtful and offensive to people in the community who consider this a coveted ritual," he said.

Abby Porth of the Jewish Community Relations Council charged Schofield with wasting city resources for an inappropriate political stunt that was unlikely to become law.

"This is one of the most fundamental practices to our tradition of over 3,000 years," she said. "It's symbolic of our covenant with God."

Porth said the Jewish community would form a coalition against the initiative with medical professionals and Muslims, who also practice circumcision. [see Judeo-Islamic https://sacreator.com/thought-for-the-day-judeo-what]

"It's very similar to those of the Jewish faith," said Omar Nawaz of the Bay Area-based Zaytuna College, one of the nation's few Muslim colleges. "It's a religious tradition and it's important for us."

Both pro- and anti-circumcision advocates make health claims but the medical research does not firmly support either position.

The American Academy of Pediatrics holds that there are both benefits and risks to infant circumcision, and recommends that parents make the choice for themselves.

Several other health bodies are reviewing the evidence on circumcision with an eye to new policy recommendations.

Circumcision rates among US male infants have dropped in recent decades, but more than half of newborns are still circumcised, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

If the ban is approved, those caught cutting the foreskins of infants and other minors would face up to a year in jail and up to $1,000 in fines.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law

Circumcision for newborn males is currently banned in all Australian public hospitals.

The Judeo-Islamic partnership in action: http://www.aussiemuslims.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30175

[Saint Ignatius' College - Adelaide]

From: gemma bateman <batemg0011@ignatius.sa.edu.au>
Subject: Religion Assignment Survey

Message Body:
Hello,
For my year 12 Studies of Religion assignment I have to distribute a survey amongst society. I was wondering if anyone on staff (even more than 1 would be great!) could undertake my quick survey. It is not long and non- intrusive. It is about basic religious beliefs and society. All answers are anonymous and confidential. Any answers would be appreciated
This is the direct link to my survey:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/religion_spirituality_gbateman

Thank you,
Gemma Bateman


--
This mail is sent via contact form on Church of Creativity South Australia https://sacreator.com


http://www.ignatius.sa.edu.au
Saint Ignatius' College - Adelaide
A Catholic school conducted by the Jesuits

[Australian comments available at:]

http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/node/3650/full

Australian comments available at: http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/my_foreign_land

I have just returned to London, where I have lived since I was 11. I have been away for four years, living as an ethnic minority in a monocultural part of the world, amassing a host of stories to tell to disbelieving friends. On the whole, I am glad to return. I shan't miss some locals' assumptions that, being a white woman, if I was outside after dark, as I occasionally was, usually to walk the few metres between my house and the church, I must be a prostitute eager to give them a blow job. I shan't miss the abuse my priest husband received: the daubing of "Dirty white dogs" in red paint on the church door, the barrage of stones thrown at him by children shouting "Satan". He was called a "f***ing white bastard" more than once, though, notably, never when in a cassock. I will also not miss the way our garden acted as the local rubbish dump, with items ranging from duvets and TV sets, to rats (dead or twitching) glued to cardboard strips, a popular local method of vermin control to stem the large numbers of them which scuttled between the rubbish piled in gardens and on pavements. Yes, I am very glad to have left Britain's second city.

For four years, we lived in inner-city Birmingham, in what has been a police no-go area for 20 years. We know that because some plain-clothed cops told us when they asked to use our vicarage as a stake-out to bust drugs rings that pervade the area. Having heard a parishioner's tales of what his neighbours did to him when he was wrongfully suspected of having grassed up a cock-fighting ring, we refused, explaining that we had to live here, they didn't. Even during this time we saw the area change. When we arrived, the population was predominantly Pakistani. Now Somalis are there in equal number. Most of the run-down Irish pubs were turned into mosques during our time.

As a woman, it was difficult for me to gain many first-hand impressions of the Muslims. I was generally ignored by both men and women, and on the rare occasion that I had to interact, when for example a car was parked illegally and blocking my gate, I was addressed as if inconsequential. My husband, however, faithfully reported conversations which you may find somewhat alarming. One of our favourite dinner-party pieces is this: opposite our vicarage there is a "library" which has some computers, some burkas and occasionally tracts that say offensive things about Jews and Christians. My husband did his photo-copying there, and got on rather well with everybody. One day he was chatting to a man with a passing resemblance to Lawrence of Arabia, who had just arrived from Antwerp — one of an increasing number of Muslims who are arriving here with EU passports. He asked him why he had come to Birmingham. He was surprised at the question: "Everybody know. Birmingham — best place in Europe to be pure Muslim." Well, there must be many places in Europe where Muslims are entirely free to practise their faith, but I suspect there are few places in which they can have so little contact with the civic and legal structure of a Western state if they choose. It seems to be particularly easy to "disappear" if that is their intention. A parishioner once described a lorry pulling up outside his house, the side opening to reveal stacked mattresses full of sleepy, and presumably illegal, immigrants, who staggered out into broad Brummie daylight. We heard tales of how houses are exchanged for cash payments in our area. An untaxed car was once clamped by a frightened-looking official at 8am, but within hours the owner of the vehicle had organised the clamps to be sawn off, and he sped away.

Another instance of separation from the Western world is revealed in the following: my husband frequently chatted to a neighbour who could be described as one of the more questioning Muslims, and who has often provided an insight into the locals' mindset. Even this man, however, believes what the whole community thinks: the 9/11 planes were organised by Jews. Everybody knows there were no Jewish people in the World Trade Centre that day, as they had been tipped off. Oh, and the Mumbai terrorists had been kidnapped and brainwashed by Indian people. The tendency towards denial is strong. When my husband mentioned the "dirty white dogs" graffiti to a local Muslim, the response was, "One of your people did it." I have to say that the police's response was no better when the local Methodists complained about the same thing. They chose not to believe it had happened, since we had removed all sign of it with the buckets of anti-graffiti chemicals we had stocked since we arrived. They asked, somewhat pathetically: "Are you sure it was racist?"

To a London reader, born and bred with multiculturalism, I know that my stories may come across as outlandish and exaggerated, and that I must surely be a BNP voter — I have observed people's expressions as they have listened to my tales of life in Brum. When I recently told a friend how a large Taliban flag fluttered gaily on a house near St Andrew's football stadium for some months, her cry of "Can't you tell the police?" made me reflect how far many of our inner cities have been abandoned by our key workers: our doctors and nurses drive in from afar, the police, as mentioned before, have shut down their stations and never venture in unless in extremis — they and ambulance crews have been known to be attacked — even the local Imam lives in a leafier area.

Only the priest remains, if you can get one — the thriving but clerically-vacant church down the road has had no applicant in two years. In their absence, we get stabbings that never make the news, dog- and cock-fighting rings, cars torched as pranks and cars used for peddling heroin. (One of the more amusing moments of our time came when a local lad provided one reason people often gave us stares when we drove past such deals: "Two white people wearing seatbelts — you've got to be cops.") In their absence, we simply have the witness of those who are unlikely to be heard, who, through a variety of unfortunate circumstances, have not been able to move out: the elderly, the infirm, the illiterate, the chronically poor. Indeed, some of the Muslim residents deeply regret the flight of the non-Muslim population. It is they who now have to live in a crime-ridden ghetto.

On holiday in Germany recently, we watched a TV documentary about how schools were coping with Essen's growing Muslim community, and how the community itself felt. When it was over, we turned to each other, and said simultaneously (a drawback of having been married for a while), "This could not have been made in Britain." At the moment, also in Germany, the whole country is debating Thilo Sarrazin's controversial book Deutschland schafft sich ab ("Germany abolishes itself"), in which the author — a former member of the board of the Bundesbank and the German Social Democrats — examines research about immigrant communities and then makes specific recommendations about the integration of the Muslim community. I have only seen scant reference to this in the British press, which usually dismisses it, wrongly and lazily in my view, as good old German racism. This has nothing whatsoever to do with race. The Muslim community in Birmingham, for instance, is made up of people from many continents and races, including Afghans, Yemenis, Pakistanis, Indians and Somalis.

There is no doubt in my mind that we need to have the same openness in discussing what is happening to many cities in Britain. If current demographic trends continue over the next few decades, the West Midlands, as well as other parts of the country, will become a predominantly Muslim area. Much more needs to be done to integrate the communities among whom I lived, and we need to be much less negligent of our own values too. Frankly, if we happened to walk down Broad Street on a Friday night, where mobs of identically undressed and mostly aesthetically unpleasing gals and lads were on the piss and pull, it was almost a relief to drive back to our ghetto enclave.

It is time to rub the rime from our eyes and to look clearly at the shape of Britain today. Everyone living here needs to be able to talk about what they see, without the lazy or fearful, but certainly paralysing, accusation of racism. Only then will we be able to discern what is best for the future.

[Pontifex Cambeul]

Now that the name has become so prevalent, and Ms Red-lard, the favourite of the Heebs, is well known throughout the country as Ju-liar (read as Jew Liar), I am waiting for the Heebs to make their declarations that the nickname is anti-Semitic and anyone using it should be arrested for Racial Vilification. Personally, I hope they try it because it will wake some more up to their manipulation of the nation.

Pontifex Cambeul



http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/tv-and-radio/alan-jones-lets-rip-at-juliar-gillard-20110225-1b7km.html

Alan Jones lets rip at 'Ju-liar' Gillard

"Do you understand, Julia, that you are the issue today, because there are people now saying your name is not Julia but Ju-liar and they are saying that we've got a liar running the country," he said on his 2GB radio show.

"Do you accept the fact that you've stolen an election with a false promise?"

Ms Gillard strongly defended the tax, emphasising that it was supported by business and would ensure Australians had the jobs of the future.

"We are very big emitters of carbon pollution per head of population, one of the biggest emitters in the world," she said.

Jones repeatedly brought up Ms Gillard's election campaign statements, and the pair engaged in a fiery debate on-air.

Gillard: Pricing carbon is the right thing to do and I said that during the election campaign.

Jones: No you did not.

Gillard: Yes I did, Alan.

Jones: Julia you gave a policy ...

Gillard: Get all of the statements out Alan, you will see during the election campaign ...

Jones: Julia, people ...

Gillard: I said climate change is real. I said we needed to address it, that pricing carbon was the most efficient way to do it, that is what happened during the election campaign.

Jones: PM, this is untruthful.

Gillard: Check my statements.

Jones: You launched the ALP campaign ... 5400 words in that speech to the ALP faithful when you launched the campaign. You did not mention carbon tax and you had one sentence on climate change ... [more ...]

[Only breed smart babies: Ethicist]

Only breed smart babies: Ethicist

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/ipad/only-breed-smart-babies-ethicist/story-fn6t2xlc-1226005179171

AN Australian ethicist has advocated genetically screening embryos to create superior "designer babies" with higher IQs.

Melbourne's Julian Salvulescu, now Oxford's practical ethics professor, has said it is our "moral obligation" to use IVF to choose the smartest embryos, even if that maintains or increases social inequality.

Experts have criticised the Gattaca-style idea, saying the money involved could be better spent improving quality of [nigger] life in Africa.

They have also warned IQ screening could result in unintended results.

But Dr Salvulescu has said we have a moral obligation to create a smarter society, thereby dramatically reducing welfare dependency, the number of school dropouts, the crowding of jails and the extent of poverty.

"There are other ethical principles which should govern reproduction, such as the public interest," Dr Salvulescu said.

"Even if an individual might have a stunningly good life as a psychopath, there might be reasons based on the public interest not to bring that individual into existence.

"My own view is that the economic and social benefits of higher cognition are reasons in favour of selection, but secondary to the benefits to the individual.

"Cheaper, efficient whole genome analysis makes it a real possibility in the near future."

His comments follow economic modelling in a research paper by Oxford University ethicists Andres Sandberg and Nick Bostrom, showing that if overall IQs were raised by 3 per cent, poverty rates and the number of males in jail would both drop by 25 per cent and welfare dependence by 18 per cent.

Increased intelligence would also reduce the number of parentless children by 20 per cent, the number of out-of-wedlock births by 25 per cent and the number of high school drop-outs by 28 per cent.

The report said while there was little evidence high intelligence caused happiness, there was "ample evidence" low intelligence increased the risk of accidents, low income and "negative life events".

"The overall societal impact of even a small increase in general cognitive function would likely to be sizeable and desirable," the authors wrote.

"Economic models of the loss caused by small intelligence decrements, due to lead in drinking water, predict significant effects of even a few points' decrease." ....

The idea, however, has even ethicists divided.

Prof Neil Levy, head of neuroethics at Florey Neuroscience Institute and a neuroethicist and deputy research director of the Oxford Centre for Neuroethics, said investing in designer embryos would be "an enormous waste of money".

"My view is this is essentially a distraction," he said.

"Why spend all that money when we could be doing so much with that money to increase the IQs and life spans of babies in sub-Saharan [sub-Human] Africa?

"The pay-off in terms of raising quality of life for many people would be much greater than you'd get from concentrating on just a few [White children]." [more ...]

Read the fear in the Comments of the dumbed down, Jew controlled, hate filled retarded who don't care for the quality of life of their own children: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/ipad/only-breed-smart-babies-ethicist/comments-fn6t2xlc-1226005179171

[A Space for Hate: The White Power Movement's Adaptation Into Cyberspace]

A Space for Hate: The White Power Movement's Adaptation Into Cyberspace
By Adam (Adam G ) Klein, Adam G. Klein

Creativity Alliance, KKK, and Stormfront websites to reveal the new ...... substitute an actual community where outright racist and anti-Semitic activists ...
http://mit.edu/comm-forum/mit6/papers/Klein.pdf (29 page abstract)

http://books.google.com.au/books?id=S_llSY4uWOAC&pg=PA104&dq=%22creativity+alliance%22&hl=en&ei=AT1aTce8N47qvQP8l5SqDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=%22creativity%20alliance%22&f=false (Complete 217 + pages)

Also located at https://creativityalliance.com/eBook-Klein-SpaceForHate.pdf (29 page abstract)

Text version extracted from the PDF page images: https://creativityalliance.com/eBook-Klein-SpaceForHate.docx (29 page abstract)


(According to Google Book search) There are Twenty results in this book for the "Creativity Alliance"

Pages: 2, 24, 73, 93, 94, 104, 130, 145, 146, 158, 159, 162, 177, 178, 199, 200, 214, 215, 216, 217

Abstract

This article examines how three prominent white-supremacy websites have adapted their extremist agendas into the online culture of cyberspace. The study applies frame analysis to the Creativity Alliance, KKK, and Storm.front websites to reveal the new "user-friendly" face of organized hate.  Through context and images, two central frames emerged from each site: The uprising.frame, that crafted an underlying message of widespread ''white-oppression" to mobilize its members, and the information frame, which legitimized that cause under the pretext of a community-based  website and research tool.  From this study, it appears these inscribers of ''white power" have effectively utilized these themes and the online culture of convergent media and social networking to attract younger net-savvy audiences.  Links to sites like Youtube and Wikipedia signify a movement that is keeping up with the times, while the global networking component of these pages further suggests intent to grow the cause into a worldwide community.

http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=A+Space+for+Hate:+The+White+Power+Movement's+Adaptation+Into+Cyberspace

@Cailen.

[Cailen]

I'm no fan of O'Connell and know him to be a hater of Creators. I also think he's a bit of a loony with the way he carries on. Nevertheless, reverse what he was convicted of saying to a Jew so that it is instead said to a White man, and apart from many of us already being on the receiving end of such abuse, it turns out it's not a crime. Furthermore, if we do dare to complain about being on the receiving end of racial abuse, we are told to grow a hide, build a bridge and get over it. The typical "Whatever!"

Or, as happened to me, threats of arrest for racial vilification if I attempt to report acts of violent racial vilification perpetrated against myself.

Cailen



Brendon Lee O'Connell found guilty of racial hatred

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/accused-racist-anthony-oconnell-demands-judge-fact-treason-charge/story-e6frg13u-1225996353894?from=public_rss

A PERTH man who posted a video online showing him arguing with a Jewish man and calling him a "racist, homicidal maniac'' has been found guilty of racial hatred.

Brendan Lee O'Connell, 38, represented himself before a jury in the Perth District Court after firing the lawyer who had been defending him against an accusation that he posted an anti-semitic video online.

O'Connell faced seven charges related to the posting of a verbal altercation he had with Stanley Keyser and Timothy Peach, who are Jewish, and was found guilty on six.

An argument broke out between the three men at an IGA supermarket in South Perth on May 2, 2009, where a Friends of Palestine group was holding a protest against Israeli oranges.

Mr Peach, 19, told the court during the trial that he was a member of the Australasian Union of Jewish Students at the time and had attended the rally to "observe" and hand out flyers to educate the protesters about Israel.

He said he was "angry", "confused" and "offended" by O'Connell when he started to film the two Jewish men and argue with them about their religion.

During the trial, O'Connell refused to acknowledge Judge Henry Wisbey when he entered the court and, instead, rose to bow to the jury.

About a dozen supporters in the court cheered when O'Connell labelled the proceedings "a kangaroo court" and gave a long, repetitive rant about the King James Bible and the Constitution.

The video that O'Connell posted online was shown on the first day of the trial.

"You have a religion of racism, hate, homicide and ethnic cleansing," O'Connell says to the men on the video.

"You are a racist, homicidal maniac."

When the jury found O'Connell guilty on Friday, he shouted: "Free Palestine! Free Iraq!" before being taken away.

Outside court, Mr Keyser's mother Shelley said it was "a big relief" for the "terrible" ordeal to be over.

O'Connell was remanded in custody and is due to reappear in court on Monday.

[@Cailen.]

This is race, religion and law from a definite mud perspective, but I believe it's something that all Creators should consider. As Creators, we don't actually have a code of "laws" like the Muslims, but we do have moral codes which derive from our Holy Books. To do as the Muslims do and claim that all laws derive from our Holy Books and to devise a common punishment for wrong-doers could be very useful for White people as they would be able to reject Sharia (Muslim) Law and possibly all other laws detrimental to White people being imposed on them. Do remember that if we were to follow this path, it would take years of debate by everyone, and if anything was to eventually come out of it, it would need to be codified by our best scholars overseen by our lawyer members, before being passed onto independent lawyers friendly to our cause to scrutinise every line of text with an eye to comparisons with current state, national, international and religious laws ... but that's just a reasonable scenario of what may come. Anyway, the news article is below and is yours to speculate, debate and judge. Enjoy.

@Cailen.



Human Rights Charter opens door to Sharia law recognition

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/charter-opens-door-to-sharia-law-recognition/story-e6frg8zx-1225964766903

THE issue of Sharia law and human rights is rippling around the world.

In the US state of Oklahoma, voters recently approved a proposal that forbids state courts from considering or using international laws, as well as Sharia, or Islamic law.

A US federal judge has suspended the certification of that change to the law because it might breach the constitutional rights of individual Muslims.

In Victoria (Australia), the Charter of Human Rights actually permits the use of international laws and judgments in applying the charter.

Section 14 of that charter provides for freedom of religion. The issue then arises, does this mean that Muslims are entitled to have Shariah law applied to them in the Victorian courts?

Obviously, Islam is a religion. Less obvious, but more important is that, unlike Christianity, Islam is a complete religion governing every aspect of the believer's life, including law.

Shariah law is actually an integral part of the Islamic religious belief and, under the charter, must be protected and applied. Section 32(2) of the charter throws more light on the issue.

That subsection states: "International law and the judgments of domestic, foreign and international courts and tribunals relevant to a human right may be considered in interpreting a statutory provision."

It is important to understand that there are "courts and tribunals" applying Shariah law to the 1.6 billion Muslims in the Muslim world.

In addition to that, the Islamic world has its own Human Rights Covenants -- the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, 1990, which is intended to "serve as a general guidance for member states in the field of human rights".

In the Cairo Declaration, it is made clear that all human rights derive from the Koran.

For example: "There shall be no crime or punishment except as provided for in the Shariah" (Article 19(d)); "All the rights and freedoms stipulated in this declaration are subject to the Islamic Shariah" (Article 24); and "The Islamic Shariah is the only source of reference for the explanation or clarification of any of the articles of this Declaration" (Article 25).

These human rights must be fully respected. Australian Muslims deserve no less.

Decisions on Islamic human rights must be relevant in deciding whether Shariah law is applicable in Victoria.

Quite obviously, those Islamic decisions powerfully state that Shariah law must be applied. The Victorian courts must consider these decisions under the charter, thus it makes it very likely that, at some stage in the future, Shariah law will be applied.

Further, there is precedent in Victoria through courts that are for the exclusive use of a minority group, in this instance Aborigines (known in Victoria as Kooris).

As a matter of principle, there is no difference between special courts that are racially defined (Koori courts) to those which are religiously defined (Shariah courts).

In fact, the Muslims have a much stronger case because their devoutly held beliefs actually include a legal system (Shariah).

It is this sort of process that the Oklahoma citizens voted against. In Victoria it is too late.

Peter Faris, QC, is a Melbourne barrister and media commentator