Promoting Our Cause and Optics

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Someone asked this about Creativity ...

How do you feel about optics? For example some of the "alt-right" believe in dress codes while addressing our cause in the people eye. It goes deeper then that, but this is an example.

How about leadership, is it ok to allow convicted felons of heinous crimes to address our people about our cause?

Heinous crimes such as murder, or child molestation. Whether they were set up or if there crime justifiable, do we allow such individuals to be the face of our cause?

[Sturmkrieger]

There is importance in having a good image for the public, but a good image alone doesn't please the masses. We very well could have a bunch of rich, well-dressed men and women promote Creativity, but the generally apathetic White masses would still listen to the Judenpresse's lies about us and continue to hate us. But what Creativity seeks isn't just the masses looking for a good image, it seeks true White Racial Loyalists who are completely devoted to our race. In that, I don't believe you particularly need a "good image" person to promote the message. A person who is serious about saving the White Race will look upon the creed you present to him or her, and Creativity is the only creed for saving the White Race.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Crims: We're our own judge and jury. We judge who is fit to be called a Creator, and who loses the right to remain or become a Creator.

Regarding someone who was charged and convicted with paedophilia - not actually touching children, but accused of looking at pictures on the internet - the National Alliance has had to deal with this issue. One of their people was falsely maliciously accused by a mendacious wife. The NA's choice was to either stand by their man or accept the wife and JOG's version. To the NA's credit, they stood by their man. However, what is important is that the NA were able to make the choice because they knew the accused and his situation personally. There was no guessing or juggling of choices involved. When it comes right down to it, a malicious wife attempting to take the kids away from the father was exactly all that was about.

Regarding an accused rapist: A Creator was accused of raping his wife and sentenced to forty years. Again, the problem was a malicious wife looking to have her husband locked up and knowing that the JOG would do absolutely anything she wanted. While things didn't go quite that bad for me, I am divorced, lost my daughter and know full well that women will say anything to have the father of their child locked up. Without knowing all the details, I had to guess that the brother was innocent. Once we were able to correspond once again, I got the full story from the brother and his step-mother. I have known this brother for eighteen years and I trust him.

Regarding conviction for murder: This one is more straight-forward. Killed a Kike or other Mud? What's the reason? Self defence against a mud is reason enough for us.  Killed a White Man? We want to know the background and then we will make our judgement.

Clothing: We've had leaders in Creativity in the past demand that we wear suits and ties wherever we go. We've had leaders in Creativity demand we wear torn jeans, scruffy bomber jackets and swastikas everywhere. We've instead chosen the sensible middle path: Clean and tidy clothing, no swastikas, no foul language or offensive (by our standards) pictures. And no playing dress up in GI Joe PJ's. However, if suits and ties is your thing, then go for it.

Some of us may look a little rough and some of us come with an unpleasant past, but then, so do diamonds. Every Creator is a diamond in the rough. We may not be pretty, but being pretty is not what being a Creator is about.

@Cailen.