#SSM Same Sex Marriage - VOTE NO - New Hate-Crime Laws

[Rev.Cambeul]

LMWAO 

Ugly and racist same-sex marriage rant caught on camera
A WOMAN has been filmed yelling racist abuse at an anti same-sex marriage campaigner as she tried to remove his signs.

Victoria Craw | News.com.au (Australia) | 28 September 2017

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/ugly-and-racist-samesex-marriage-rant-caught-on-camera/news-story/5d7ca0d44f29b267161c6f3ace2ce21f

Extract: A SAME-SEX marriage supporter has been caught on camera shouting racist abuse at a No voter while removing his signs from a Sydney intersection.

Video posted on Ray Hadley's Facebook page shows a young woman collecting signs that say "It's OK to vote No" posted around a busy intersection at King Georges Road in Sydney's west.

The young woman is shown swearing, yelling insults and running down the middle of the road before approaching a Lebanese-Catholic Australian man known as Alan who is filming the encounter.

"Gimme those signs," she said to him while he tells her not to touch him.

"You've done well. That will do. You're not taking them," Alan said.

"Give me those signs," she replies. "I'm not threatening anybody, you're double the size of me."

Alan says to her: "Please don't touch me or my signs," before copping racist abuse.

"Get the f**k out of our country," she yells at him while walking away down the road.

"Go back to la la la la la Arabland ... you want to change our country, go change your own f***d up country get the f**k out of ours."

https://www.facebook.com/therayhadleymorningshow/videos/1980105682233508/

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

You can't expect any activism or anything from most Australians,just insults and swear words really.
Then they go back to their Beer and Football with the rest of the sheep.

I would have belted her I think, touching somebody when it isn't wanted after warning them not to is an assault.
She is putting herself in a man's position.She could be treated as such.

[Rev.Cambeul]

https://twitter.com/MarkACollett/status/914906450006339585

[Rev.Cambeul]

Did you know that fags and dykes have more rights in the UK? Their de-facto/common-law marriages are recognised under British law, but the same de-facto marriages between people of opposite genders are considered illegal.

A de facto relationship is defined in Section 4AA of the Family Law Act 1975. The law requires that you and your partner, who may be of the same or opposite sex, had a relationship as a couple living together on a genuine domestic basis.

Common-law marriage, also known as sui juris marriage, informal marriage, marriage by habit and repute, or marriage in fact is a legal framework in a limited number of jurisdictions where a couple is legally considered married, without that couple having formally registered their relation as a civil or religious union.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-10-12/gay-couples-in-uk-have-more-rights-than-straight-relationships/9039400

And BTW ... For all of those out there that read our posts and comments, but think we're evil Nazis that deserve to be screwed over by companies like PayPal - which of course we naturally boycott in return - your precious icon of financial rebellion is now throwing its millions (read that as YOUR DOLLARS) into the same-sex marriage debate.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/paypal-to-fund-yes-campaign-for-marriage-equality-in-australia-launches-donationmatching-scheme/news-story/de18e78b74d1da64e9616681e065696e

For those uncomfortable with that, you'd better pull every penny out of your PayPal accounts and close them NOW; because if PayPal get wind that you're opposed to their gay agenda against families, they will seize your funds and withdraw from your attached bank accounts any amount they determine you may be in debt for.

You will not be permitted to close your PayPal account or be able to prevent PayPal drawing on your bank accounts however any PayPal operator may wish. Your only options are to either close your connected bank accounts, or accept it that you have no rights and you're a dumb arsed traitor to your own kind, when PayPal rips out forty grand or whatever from your bank accounts for reasons yet to be determined.

Get Smart: #BoycottPayPal

@Cailen.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

 The article states "HP" is one of the tech Giants donating money to the fag cause!

Well most people think HP stands for "Hewlett Packard"
But it should stand for "Hindus and Phillipinos" because that is the kind of people they employ in Australia now.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

AN OPPONENT of same-sex marriage has been ordered by Mitcham Council to take down a sign from his property – or face a $20,000 fine.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenger/east-hills/mitcham-council-orders-resident-to-take-down-vote-no-sign-or-face-penalty-of-up-to-20000/news-story/89e873c503655fd6dc65b7415e215791

Ernie van Stralen put the sign, reading "Vote No, it's the loving thing to do", in the front garden of his East Pde, Kingswood, home last month.

But it was soon vandalised and Mr van Stralen was contacted by council staff, who told him it required development approval.

The council ordered Mr van Stralen to remove the sign by Monday, October 9.

He felt he had been "victimised" by people who had complained to the council.

"(The council) sent me the notice that I had to take it down ... or I'd get a $750 fine, and if I wouldn't comply they'd take me to court and I'd lose and have to pay court costs," Mr van Stralen said.

"It smacked a little bit of heavy-handed policing. Even though it was well handled, I still think there needs to be some room for expressing our opinion."

He said the first sign he put up was stolen and a subsequent sign had a rock thrown through, was defaced it and ripped down.

To protect it against vandalism, he resorted to taking the sign down at night and putting it up again in the morning.

A letter from Mitcham Council development compliance officer Henry Mitchell earlier this month informed Mr van Stralen that his sign was a "construction or alteration of the land".

If Mr van Stralen or the council had chosen to take the matter to court, Mr van Stralen could have faced a penalty of up to $20,000 plus legal costs.

Should he have continued to leave the sign up, after a conviction, he would have been fined a further $500 a day.

Mitcham's general manager of development and community safety, Craig Harrison, said Mr van Stralen's sign was considered advertising and could not be put up without lodging a development application, even though it was temporary.

The state's Development Act gives councils the power to request the removal of illegal signs and enforce a penalty if residents do not comply.

Under the Act, any sign that is "visible from the road or public place or by passengers carried on any form of public transport" requires council approval.

Mr Harrison said only real estate, directional and commercial signage were exempt from the law.

"The content of the sign was not considered offensive. However, as it was an advertisement and (a) subsequent change in land use without development approval, the sign was required to be removed," Mr Harrison said.

Mitcham Council says it has taken down two other signs across the district in relation to the marriage law postal survey – both against same-sex marriage.

The home of a Yes voter, adorned with advertising.

The council does not have a formal position on same-sex marriage.

The sign is now being stored away from public view, in Mr van Stralen's backyard.

Mitcham Council says it has taken down two other signs across the district in relation to the marriage law postal survey – both against same-sex marriage.

The council does not have a formal position on same-sex marriage.

MITCHAM Council will fly the rainbow flag for a fortnight during November's Feast (Fag) Festival ... to support diversity.
http://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/mitcham-council-to-fly-rainbow-flag-during-feast-festival/news-story/57ed7fde44883b988f31967395b1eb78