Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Enacting Anti-White Hate Laws

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

A university student could be studying anything from a trade, to Law, to Dentistry, to Philosophy, to Visual art.

You'd think a person who has served Australia in the ADF may be considered "a reasonable person" too? Or ... perhaps not ... if he rides a motorbike and has a few tattoos, perhaps some clothes with "rough looking" paraphernalia on them. Perhaps it is reasonable to say he is a member of prohibited organisation then? He must be a "roughian"?!

I wonder if it is "reasonable" to lump a member of a Christian bike club in with these unreasonable roughians who don't follow the good book?

[Rev.Cambeul]

A university student could be studying anything from a trade, to Law, to Dentistry, to Philosophy, to Visual art.

Any university student that drinks at the uni bar or goes to watch bands at the uni bar is part of the university social life. And to be part of the university social life, you have to be a total, leftard nut-job.

Anything less than the open declaration that all White People Have to Die, will have them outed as Nazis ... and if not expelled by popular demand from the reasonable people at the university (that's students and lecturers), they will ultimately fail whatever course is their chosen pursuit, and be forced to return to a lifetime of cleaning the chicken sh*t from the deep-fryer at Kentucky Fried Chicken.

You'd think a person who has served Australia in the ADF may be considered "a reasonable person" too? Or ... perhaps not ...

As a former soldier, I can say definitely not. As a former soldier, society treats me as a baby killing, racist, paid serial killer, preying on innocent women, children, homosexuals and immigrants. I am a threat to the government and democracy, and police fear gatherings of soldiers in any civilian context. Due to the nature of the military command structure, I am trained to be a so-called fascist, by so-called fascists. Little wonder that so many ex soldiers raise the middle finger to so-called respectable people and gravitate towards the outer edges of respectable society, joining motorcycle clubs and becoming active as White Racial Loyalists.

On the other hand - at least on the surface - these days, soldiers appear to be treated better than ever since Vietnam, but when you get right down to the grimy, sweaty balls of it, soldiers - especially former soldiers are treated as the scum of the earth by just about everyone.

wonder if it is "reasonable" to lump a member of a Christian bike club in with these unreasonable roughians who don't follow the good book?

Your democratic government, police and mainstream media certainly think that it's reasonable to lump all who appear to fit a certain archetype that is White, Male and Masculine in together as unreasonable, rebellious roughians. Even your average MSM consuming idiot is so bogged up by the constant stream of swill that they swallow, that even though they fit the very same demographic, they love to sit in accusation, categorising their peers by an archetype which they are force fed to hate, but still unknowingly abide by. So, by that definition alone, any proclaimed Pub Test would have to take place in a controlled environment, away from any genuinely average White Australian Male. Hence, the Pub Test will take place in university bars across the country to the toilet-gurgling strains of Propagandhi.

@Cailen.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Australia's gutless, self-proclaimed Jewish turd of a prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has struck a compromise deal for changes to section 18C of the ­Racial Discrimination Act that is expected to retain the offences of humiliate and intimidate on the grounds of race, but abolish ­"insult" and "offend" in favour of what is claimed to be a new higher test of "harass".

The Old:

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
             (1)  It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:

                     (a)  the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and

                     (b)  the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

The New:

RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C

Offensive behaviour because of race, colour or national or ethnic origin
             (1)  It is unlawful for a person to do an act, otherwise than in private, if:

                     (a)  the act is reasonably likely, in all the circumstances, to harass, humiliate or intimidate another person or a group of people; and

                     (b)  the act is done because of the race, colour or national or ethnic origin of the other person or of some or all of the people in the group.

According to every Muslim, Palestinian, Afghani, Leb or whatever that I've ever had a problem with in life, due to the nature of my being a White Man who will not get down on my knees and beg forgiveness for the sins of my race, I have been accused of harassing them, attempting to humiliate and intimidate them ... All because I said No to their lousy demands; because I refuse to run when ordered out; because I exist and I fight until I win. That alone is enough for those who's task it is to enact and pursue the laws of the land to declare me a White Supremacist and absolve me any right to exist.

Put simply, they hate White people and they want us, they want you and your children dead.

Changes in the semantics of a law does not alter a law. Nor does it alter how the law is pursued by those with a political and racial agenda to protect so-called minorities while punishing the White (so-called) majority for merely being White. And yet, this is enough that it will keep the libtards of the right-wing mainstream happy.

In short: The Australian prime minister followed the bidding of his Semitic masters and remains a gutless, gutless Goy, self-identifying as a Jewish turd. Australia's anti-White Hate Laws have not been repealed. And for all intents and purposes, they remain unchanged.

@Cailen.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/turnbull-locks-in-racehate-law-reform/news-story/7a09e03b84c24585fcaf76c196225e0c?nk=5210ea90b0ec71d2453bb016f53292c9-1490079967

Labor MP Linda Burney, the first Aboriginal woman elected to the House of Representatives, said "I challenge - in fact I demand - that those people that want to water down 18C come out here, face the media, face the Australian people, and say what it is that you can't say today that you will be able to say if you water down 18C ... ya White dogs." {Final words implied but allegedly not said.}

http://www.9news.com.au/national/2017/03/21/11/32/coalition-debate-watering-down-18c-racial-discrimination-act-on-harmony-day

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

So technically speaking, if you go around in public and show this toy to a nigger, you could be in hot water?

[Rev.Cambeul]

Forcing it to look is harassment.

Three months in prison for refusal to obey the judge of the High Court of Australia and say Sorry and hand over the cash like you've been told.

How many of those type of things do you think I have around my home now? 

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Perhaps if you showed a black this doll you may not be in trouble? So who determines harassment? The court or The victim?