Norway: Mass murderer is anti-racist, pro-homosexual and pro-Israel

[Rev.Cambeul]

What kind of an automatic weapon was he shooting with that he managed to kill 80 people ?

I read elsewhere that Anders Behring Breivik owned a Glock pistol and an M16. Whether he had either or both of those weapons with him on Utoya island - which I remind people was the location of a Boycott Israel protest on the day before the shootings - I do not know. All I know is that the MSM claim that Anders Behring Breivik used an "assault rifle." But we know how the media like to lead people in the wrong direction to form conclusions that the media, and especially in this case, the Kosher crowd desire.

Pontifex Cambeul.

[Maritz]

Another operation to clamp down on "right wingers" ... its even being felt in SA

Oslo killer copied from SA blog  

Johannesburg - Norwegian mass-murderer Anders Behring Breivik is reported to have copied several ideas from a right-wing South African website when he compiled his 1 518-page "manifesto".

Breivik borrowed liberally from several sources in writing his rambling ideas to defend Western civilisation.

One of his themes is the struggle against multi-culturalism, and he used several articles on the topic from the blog iluvsa.blogspot.org, http://iluvsa.blogspot.com/ which has a banner proclaiming: "I luv South Africa... but I hate my government".

Breivik quotes the blog about "the modern South Africa, 'The Rainbow Nation', where under black rule the Marxist ANC are viciously persecuting whites ... and where poignantly, let's not forget, many black people are now suffering far more than they ever did under apartheid".

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Oslo-killer-copied-from-SA-blog-20110726

[Sinn]

If anyone is interested, here is the manifesto:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=PO3E50UA

[Rev.Cambeul]

Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard mentioned in Manifesto.

"Luckily, not all Christian leaders are appeasers of Islam. One of the intelligent ones comes from Australia, a country that has been fairly resistant to Political Correctness. ... Prime Minister John Howard has repeatedly proven to be one of the most sensible leaders in the Western world."

http://www.smh.com.au/world/australian-leaders-mentioned-in-manifesto-20110726-1hxhd.html

Which immediately brings to mind ...

Google Search: http://www.google.com/search?q=john+howard+best+friend+israel

One of our best friends defeated

Many Australian Jews and Israelis will be deeply saddened to lose a leader whose genuine and unremitting friendship captured their hearts. John Howard was unquestionably one of Israel's greatest champions among world statesmen and a unique friend of the Jewish people.

His outspoken support for Israel during the difficult days of the second intifada and Second Lebanon War set him apart from other leaders, including those who regarded themselves as friends of Israel. He regarded his principled support of Israel as a moral imperative and displayed contempt for the political correctness exemplified by the Europeans at international forums who were inclined to distance themselves from supporting Israel even when, by all objective criteria, the Jewish state held the moral high ground.

http://wordfromjerusalem.com/?p=229
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1195546752375&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull


Israel feels tarnished as critics apply apartheid tag

"John Howard was instinctively, as a conservative, a friend of Israel. ... I regard him as a Christian Zionist – he understands and has some sympathy for us. Australia gives me enormous pride."

http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/israel-feels-tarnished-as-critics-apply-apartheid-tag-20091116-ii8j.html


A Distant Affinity: The History of Australian-Israeli Relations

John Howard's personal sympathy and regard for Israel, which he first visited privately as a young man in 1964, is something he declares regularly and is reflected in his government's policy. As opposition leader he expressed "on behalf of the Opposition, to the people of Israel and to those of Jewish persuasion within Australia...our respect and admiration for their contribution to the cause of peace around the world."[104] Shortly after taking office, he declared himself a "long-standing friend of Israel."[105] In 2000 he declared, "The personal affection I have for the state of Israel, the personal regard I have for the Jewish people of the world, will never be diminished. It is something I hold dearly, something I value as part of my being and as part of what I have tried to do with my life."[106] In 2002, he called himself an "unapologetic and long-standing friend of Israel."[107] In 2007, he spoke of the "personal commitment I have to the relationship between Australia and the State of Israel" and the "precious bilateral relationship between Australia and Israel."[108]

http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DRIT=3&DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=253&PID=0&IID=1927&TTL=A_Distant_Affinity:_The_History_of_Australian-Israeli_Relations

A Comparison of White Zionists/Kosher Konservatives

Anders Behring Breivik: Zionist.
John Howard (Former Australian Prime Minister): Zionist.
George W. Bush (Former US President): Zionist.
Joe Biden (US Vice President): Zionist.

World Leaders with their Jewish Bosses <a target="_blank" href="http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/Jewsunited.htm">http://www.thenewsturmer.com/On%20Jews/Jewsunited.htm</a>

What is it that singles Anders Behring Breivik out from the other three is that even though he has killed the fewest, Breivik is only the canon fodder of the Zionist cause. Like Geert Wilders, being a White man, he was supported by the Zionist cause up to the commission of a belligerent act against the state. And because he is not a "democratically" elected statesman – a peer of the Zionist cause – the Zionist clique immediately dropped him like the bad smell he is. Breivik is a warning from the Zionists that when Muslims are allowed to gain the upper hand over Jews, White people will suffer. Keep an eye out for it and you will undoubtedly find Jewish commentators – not so-called Jewish extremist bloggers, but official commentators at that – stating more or less as I have: that White people need to suffer in order to promote the Zionist cause.

But why should we peaceful White folk be forced to suffer because Jews and Muslims – who are an alien presence in our lands – are in a never-ending war with one-another? There is only one solution to this problem: Remove the war from our soil. Ship all of the Jews and Muslims back to the Middle East and seal off the borders for the next hundred years. Let them fight it out amongst themselves, and with any luck, they will annihilate themselves and eradicate the twin pestilence of Islam and Judaism from the face of the Earth. If Kosher Konservatives like Howard and Bush don't like that, then out they can go too; otherwise it's the traditional punishment of traitors for them – Death!

Pontifex Cambeul.

[Sinn]

Assuming this wasn't a JOG fronted operation, I have to say that I am on the fence when it comes to this attack. On the one hand, he killed White kids (majority of them were White) who did nothing wrong (yet). On the other hand he killed future left wing leaders that would continue to inflict damage on the White Race within Norway once they inherit the positions within government, government departments, organisations and businesses that will only continue to legislate and execute policies for the jews and against The White Race, most notably of all, importing more muds and propagating multiculturalism.

I am in no way a supporter of Breivik's ideology and political leaanings, and certainly not religious affiliation, however I question myself, whether this was a good thing from the point of view of our Racial position and interests.

What are your opinions in that regard ?

[Rev.Cambeul]

They weren't kids were they? Ages 17 to 25 I believe? The same as the Young Liberals and Young Labor in Australia. Young yes, but not children. Adults with the right to vote and die for their country in the nation's military forces.

Racially speaking, those murdered by the Zionist Bomber of Oslo, were already Marxists lost to the White Racial Cause. Labour/Labor/Democrat is the Communist Party of the 21^st Century. They are Left-Wing radicals that gather all others of that ilk under their banner. By the same token, today's so-called "Right-Wing" neo-Cons (Liberal/Tory/Republican) are Kosher Konservatives that really should be labelled by the media as Left-Wing conservatives. Both different sides of the Jewish shekel.

Testimonials [have] started emerging of a lost generation of future Norwegian political leaders cut down. These included Anders Kristiansen, 18, whose mother said he "dreamed of becoming prime minister since the age of five" and whose talent was lauded by Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere in the national press.

So, to answer your question Reverend Sinn: No matter whether they were Radical Left or Conservative Left, so as sad as their deaths are, I will not shed a tear for them. They are enemies of the White Race that have chosen their position in the cold race-war that exists wherever White people remain, and they must therefore live and unfortunately for them, die by the consequences of their decision. That pro-Jewish Marxists were murdered by a Kosher Konservative, is perhaps poetic justice.

On the other hand, I would rather not see another White person die because of alien interference. So I say that we ship all Muslims and Jews back to the Middle East and let the bastards fight it out. Let them nuke each other out of existence, and the world will be a better place for it.

Perhaps the tragic deaths of those in Norway will lead to a new racial awakening of Norway, and put an end to the Jewish Marxist and Jewish Zionist influences tearing that once great nation apart. We can only hope.

@Cailen.