2009-07-30 Australia: If the Sheet Fits Wear It

[Rev.Cambeul]

They believe we are causing the trouble just by existing. They don't realise that without us, the JOG would have no reason to tolerate them and would wipe them all out in an instant. Unfortunately it's a balance that has come about in the last forty-five years that keeps us and them free.

Think about it.

@Cailen.

[Rev.Cambeul]

https://sacreator.com/another-hypocritical-article-about-creativity-from-the-msm

Update: October 36 AC


Australian Press Council
Adjudication No. 1445 (adjudicated October 2009)
http://www.presscouncil.org.au/pcsite/adj/1445.html

Australian Press Council Newsletter
http://www.presscouncil.org.au/uploads/52321/nov09.pdf

The Press Council has dismissed a complaint from Cailen Cambeul, of the self-styled Church of Creativity, South Australia, that the News Limited website, The Punch, misrepresented adherents of the church as uneducated, illiterate and prone to committing violence.

Mr Cambeul, who runs the church, complained that The Punch columnist, Tory Shepherd, insinuated that he had a criminal history, and had nullified his church's right to be accepted as a legitimate religious body.

Ms Shepherd's column, which appeared on July 30, 2009, was written after she explored an array of unusual religious and political websites, including the Church of Creativity. She wrote that Cambeul had "a bit of a chequered history" and that the church's members were just "a few loners looking for something to do with all their hate".

In a brief reply to Mr Cambeul's complaint, The Punch said that Mr Cambeul was a self-confessed racist and that the Church of Creativity was a white supremacist organisation, not a recognised religion.

Mr Cambeul, who describes himself on his website as, "The racist formerly known as Colin Campbell", argued that he is a white separatist, not a supremacist. However his advice to The Punch that "We do accept that White people are intellectually superior to the other races" fits most definitions of a supremacist belief.

The Council finds that the majority of The Punch's column to which Mr Cambeul objected in fact referred to organisations other than his own. It is difficult to see how the column could void his church's claim to religious legitimacy, nor does the description of Mr Cambeul's career as "chequered" necessarily imply criminality.

The Council accepts that bylined columnists are free to express controversial opinions provided – as in this instance – the opinions are derived from fact.

[Rev.Cambeul]

http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/146994/Report-of-the-Independent-Inquiry-into-the-Media-and-Media-Regulation-web.pdf

The independent inquiry into Australian Media and Media Regulation is to determine whether a government regulatory body would better fill the role than the current self regulated body known as the Australian Press Council (with whom we Creators have had our own dealings with as stated in an above entry).

Page 412 of the Report | Page 418 of the PDF

1450
Dishonesty
Upheld
Concerned undisclosed digital manipulation of photos to create an image of two celebrities embracing.

1445
Misrepresentation
Dismissed

1444
Racism, misogyny, viciousness
Upheld
Concerned publication of letter to the editor effectively comparing Viet Cong women to animals and supporting controlled genocide of their children.

1440
Unfair; invasion of privacy
Dismissed
Concerned article about alleged poor treatment of Indigenous patients at a regional hospital and included medical histories supplied by the patients' relatives.

Case Number 1445 consists of the complaint I made to the Press Council re the article at the head of this topic by Tory Shepherd - Deputy Editor of The Sheeple Punch and reporter for the Adelaide Advertiser. Notice that there is no comment given and the complaint which was to do with Racial, Cultural and Religious Vilification and everything in between and connected was watered down by the Australian Press Council and then totally ignored by this independent government inquiry? The lack of comments surrounding the case are themselves proof that White people will fair no better and possibly worse under the proposed changes to media laws, while all that fit in the politically correct category will gain considerably due to the intimidation of a new JOG regulatory body with the authority to make legal decisions on even THIS forum.

@Cailen.