Main Menu
• Shortened Link: W23.link » CreativityAlliance.com
• Beat the Censors on Social Media with ᵂ23 ᴰᴼᵀ ᴸᴵᴺᴷ
• Free Pontifex Maximus @P.M.JoeEsposito USA - Refused Parole Due to Creativity
• Free @Rev.JoelDufresne P.O.W. USA - Prison Martyr - Bogus Charges
• Free @JamesCostello P.O.W. UK - 5 Years for Anti-Immigration Stickers
Join the Church of Creativity - Limited Time: Free Membership


DOJ's Trump Affidavit 'Should Remain HIDDEN From Public Until VIOLATIONS Found

Started by G.L.R., Sat 20 Aug 2022

Previous topic - Next topic

G.L.R.

Judge who authorized Trump FBI search appears willing to unveil some of Mar-a-Lago affidavit

Aug 18, 2022


A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Justice Department to put  forward proposed redactions as he committed to making public at least  part of the affidavit supporting the search warrant for former President  Donald Trump's estate in Florida. U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart gave prosecutors a week to  submit a copy of the affidavit with proposed redactions for the  information it wants to keep secret after the FBI seized classified and  top secret information during a search at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate last week. The Justice Department also revealed during Thursday's hearing that  the investigation into whether Trump illegally stored classified records  at his Florida estate – and potentially violated the Espionage Act – is  still "in its early stages."



No lie is too big to ignore

Jay Bratt, a top Justice Department national security prosecutor, had  argued that the affidavit should remain hidden from the public.  Unsealing it, he said, would provide a "road map" of the investigation —  which is in its "early stages" — and expose the next steps to be taken  by federal agents and prosecutors. He argued it was in the public interest for the investigation to go forward unhindered.  As the hearing kicked off, a small caravan of vehicles with Trump  flags drove past the federal courthouse in West Palm Beach, Florida. ... Attorneys for several news organizations, including The Associated Press, argued the affidavit's release  would help the public determine if the Justice Department had  legitimate reasons for the search or if it was part of a Biden  administration vendetta against Trump, as the former president and his  backers contend.



Dual citizens!  Could this be 'foreign interference?

Trump, in a Truth Social post last week, called for the  release of the unredacted affidavit in the interest of transparency. "President Trump  decried the the search as an 'assault that could only take place in  Third World Countries,' asserted agents 'even broke into my safe,' and  otherwise challenged the validity of the search."  Reinhart gave the government until next Thursday to submit its  version with the proposed redactions. He said he would then review it  and may meet lawyers... Justice Department attorneys have argued in a court filings that the investigation into Trump's handling of "highly classified material" is  ongoing ...



"It's in the public interest" not to share anything with the public

A recent filing by Juan Antonio Gonzalez, the U.S. attorney in Miami, and Bratt, a top Justice Department national security official, says making the affidavit public would "cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation." "If disclosed, the affidavit would serve as a roadmap to the  government's ongoing investigation... That is a special category  meant to protect the nation's most important secrets that if revealed  publicly could cause "exceptionally grave" damage to U.S. interests. The  court records did not provide specific details about information the  documents might contain.


"Let's Go Brandon ... I agree!" :ok

G.L.R.

I have no doubt whatsoever that a Jew would attempt an assassination of Trump.  How well do you know your history?  Today's Gab.

BigGoblinslayingKoranBurning Steve@BGKB



"Let's Go Brandon ... I agree!" :ok

Similar topics (5)

 
 
Church Links Holy Books W.R.L. Friends Holoco$t Links
 

Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]
 
The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]



Creator Origins
Church of the Creator: Founded by Ben Klassen - Year Zero (1973CE)
Your Own Creator Forum: Continuously Online Since 25AC (1998CE)
Creativity Alliance & Church of Creativity: Founded 30AC (2003CE)
Links: The History of Creativity | The Creator Calendar Explained
» Save the White Race - Join the Church of Creativity «

23 Words
What is good for the White Race is of the Highest Virtue;
What is bad for the White Race is the Ultimate Sin.


Main Website   Forum RSS Feed   Send Mail   About Us
Copyright © 30 AC - AC (2003 CE - CE), Creativity Alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Back to the Top