Messages

I finally found the time to sit and watch this documentary.

It's definitely interesting and worthwhile watching. One of the thoughts it definitely left me with is that we must ensure that we maintain our environment, we musn't allow civilisation and the pursuit of progress to destroy our natural environment - Planet Earth - the only habitat man has ever called home. As White people with the ability to make such a massive impact on our environment, we must take responsibility to ensure that our environment will remain hospitable for future generations. We must find the balance between ecological sustainability and technological advancement.

This documentary also reminds me of why I am a Creator. Humanity, Nature's greatest experiment and the White race, Nature's greatest success is something that I want to remain on this Planet Earth. I want to not only see the White race and it's many creations remain on the Earth but I want to see us evolve, improve and advance in to the future - creating more and reaching heights we can not yet imagine possible. Humanity without the White race may remain, the niggers may go back to their primitive existence prior to White colonisation but they will never achieve the progress that Whites have made possible. Without the White race, the future depicted in this documentary is most likely the case.

Keep up the fight comrades!

I'm looking forward to watching this.

[A Few Notes:]

http://www2.ohchr.org/english/law/cerd.htm

Read that.  Then read NER:19 - "Respect for Whose Law and Order?."

A Few Notes:

"all human beings are born free and equal..."

There is no such thing as "free and equal" under natural law.

"all human beings... are entitled to equal protection of the law"

There are no rights or entitlements in nature.

"any doctrine of superiority based on racial differentiation is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous, and that there is no justification for racial discrimination, in theory or in practice, anywhere"

I don't even have to elaborate.

"Reaffirming that discrimination between human beings on the grounds of race, colour or ethnic origin is an obstacle to friendly and peaceful relations among nations"

Not if those states and nations are homogenous, as nature intended.

"Convinced that the existence of racial barriers is repugnant to the ideals of any human society"

They apparently don't count our future society under Creativity as a "human society."

"speedily eliminating racial discrimination in all its forms and manifestations, and to prevent and combat racist doctrines"

This is their battle cry.  They are, of their own admission, fighting the survival, expansion, and advancement to which we are entitled.

And this only covers the introduction.  Wake up White man - fight or die.

[Hospital pays compensation over 'racism' death]

Hospital pays compensation over 'racism' death

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/31/hospital-pays-compensation-racism-death

Martin Jacques: 'The pain never goes away.' Photograph: Eamonn McCabe

A journalist who fought a decade-long legal battle with a Hong Kong hospital over the death of his wife has been awarded a "substantial sum" in compensation.

Martin Jacques, author of When China Rules the World and a Guardian columnist, has always maintained that his wife, Harinder Veriah, 33, an Indian-Malaysian, died after suffering negligence brought on by racism. Their son, Ravi, was 16 months old when she died.

Veriah died in the Ruttonjee hospital on 2 January 2000 after an epileptic seizure. The night before, she had complained to Jacques about her poor treatment, saying she was at the "bottom of the pile" because of the colour of her skin. Her words, repeated by Jacques at her inquest, struck a chord with many among Hong Kong's ethnic communities. They prompted a campaign about racism in the country and culminated in its first anti-racism laws in 2008.

Today, speaking in Hong Kong, Jacques said he felt vindicated by the settlement, which came on the eve of a high court action against Hong Kong Hospital Authority, after an "aggressive and bloody-minded" battle.

He said: "The hospital authority settling is basically admitting that Hari's treatment was indefensible. I fought to get hospital records and I started to get a picture of what happened and the picture was that her treatment was outrageous. There's absolutely no reason why someone should die from epilepsy. Hari's death was utterly unnecessary and utterly avoidable. I have always believed that if Hari had been white or Chinese she would still be alive today. The trouble is, after a death like that you're never the same person. I've learned to handle it, but the pain never goes away."

Frances Swaine of lawyers Leigh Day welcomed the announcement of the settlement after what she described as an "arduous and demanding" case. "I am relieved that this settlement means that Martin and his son Ravi can now be released from the pressures that accompany any court case and move on in their lives," she said.

Veriah, a lawyer who worked for Lovells in Hong Kong, was admitted to Ruttonjee hospital after suffering a grand mal epileptic fit on the first day of the millennium, after a celebratory night out.

Jacques became worried for her after she told him of the racism she believed was behind her poor treatment there and he was unable to get any useful information from the duty doctor. When he received a call from a nurse the next morning to say that Veriah had suffered another fit, he was at her bedside within 10 minutes. There was no sign of a doctor, who had prescribed Valium, he said. Veriah never regained consciousness and died shortly afterwards.

At the initial inquest into her death, in November 2000 in Hong Kong, the coroner recorded a verdict of death from natural causes, saying that epilepsy sometimes claimed otherwise healthy young adults.

Jacques eventually managed to get hold of her hospital records. What he read convinced him that Veriah had suffered a respiratory depression – a decline in oxygen – after being given a sedative and that she was not monitored or treated properly.

"Valium is a sedative which can depress breathing. Her oxygen levels were falling even although she appeared to be breathing normally – and they failed to monitor her properly," said Jacques.

In 2002, at the London inquest into her death, the court heard from two pathologists, one from Hong Kong and one from Britain, who could not find anything wrong with Veriah. One theory was that she may have had a reaction to the Valium. Professor Joe Collier of St George's hospital, Tooting, said a drug that could reverse the effects of Valium was not given.

The St Pancras coroner, Dr Stephen Chan, recording an open verdict, said: "There is a question to be addressed as to the level of care in those last 20 minutes and the management and level of care given ... in the brief stay in hospital."

Jacques, who has been "very damaged" by what happened to his wife, said: "No one can compensate for Hari's death but justice does matter. It is tragic that care for those who are ill can be prejudiced by their colour. But as Hari found in 14 months in Hong Kong, racism is endemic to Hong Kong society."


Racism in Hong Kong

Harinder Veriah's death helped to expose an ugly truth in Hong Kong: that racism is a serious problem. In its coverage of the case, a report in the Asian Wall Street Journal entitled "Hong Kong's big dirty little secret" acknowledged that racism was so ingrained that derogatory terms for ethnic minorities such as gwei lo ("ghost people") for whites was barely noticed. In 2008 the Hong Kong government introduced an anti-racism bill that marked a milestone in the relationship between the predominantly Chinese population and its minority white citizens.