
The think-tank British Future has recently published the report How to talk about immigration based on research conducted by ICM, Ipsos MORI and YouGov. The report purports to provide a blueprint for both the pros and antis in the immigration debate to manage the subject most effectively in public discussion.
This is not something which they achieve because they have bought into the internationalist agenda, viz: "Some three or four generations on from Windrush, it is now a settled and irreversible fact that we are a multi-ethnic society. Managing immigration effectively and fairly in the public interest should and does matter to Britons from different ethnic backgrounds. We should be suspicious of approaches that sharply polarise British citizens along racial lines, in whatever direction".
Nonetheless the research does have much of interest. One finding is truly startling. Faced with the question "The government should insist that all immigrants should return to the countries they came from, whether they're here legally or illegally" the result was agree 25%, disagree 52% and neither 23% (p.17 of the report). In addition, many of those who said no to forced repatriation were also firm supporters of strong border controls and restrictive immigration policies.
http://libertygb.org.uk/v1/index.php/home/root/news-libertygb/6642-british-future-report-says-25-of-british-adults-want-all-immigrants-repatriated