Messages

[John Walsh and America's Most Wanted Termed Frauds13th July 35 A.C.]

John Walsh and America's Most Wanted Termed Frauds

13th July 35 A.C.

I called a friend and asked how he was doing.  "Better than you", he said.  He went on to explain how I had been on America's Most wanted, shown supposedly killing a black US Navy sailor for no reason - the implication being that the motive had been racial.

And so I inquired further about the so-called re-enactment.

Was there mention of the prior traffic related argument ?  Did it show that the decedent, Harold Mansfield, had gone to his home and returned with an accomplice ?  Did they mention the brick and the threat to smash my head in ?

"No, no, no", my friend said, "nothing like that.  Just showed him pulling up and you capping him when he got out of the car."

I asked my friend to call the John Walsh Tip Line to set the record straight.

I was in less than a week later watching television when the next episode of America's Most Wanted aired.

"Captured" was the key word accompanying my photo.  Yet John Walsh was careful to explain that his show had nothing to do with my arrest.  What Walsh could not explain was why the initial re-enactment had been inaccurate and why it was left to "viewers calls" to indicate "Loeb might have been threatened with a brick at the time of the shooting."

To me, there was nothing to explain.  I had always suspected America's Most Wanted and John Walsh of being throughly dishonest in what they presented as fact.

First and most obvious was the occasional profiling of those supposedly wanted on relatively minor charges.

They wouldn't be shown on America's Most Wanted unless they were actually wanted for for more serious offenses.  It is as simple as that.

Equally obvious was that re-enactments in the more serious cases routinely omitted facts and circumstances that might explain and excuse the wanted individual.

Even the reason why was obvious.

The sole purpose of America's Most Wanted is to get friends and family of the so-called suspects to snitch, where they would never do so if the truth were told.

It all seemed so obvious, and yet I don't know for sure.  Now, as a victim myself, I have my proof.  John Walsh and America's Most Wanted together are frauds.

In my case, police and prosecutors knew beyond a doubt that I had been attacked.  Witness statements had been collected, the brick itself had been taken into evidence.  The same police and prosecutors were on hand when America's Most Wanted filmed the re-enactment.  And yet the re-enactment showed no threat, no attack and no brick.  Under the circumstances, there can be no excuse.  What John Walsh is doing is intentional.  It's all about John Walsh being able to say he's had another "scumbag" captured.  It's all about him.  His show.  His ego.  And, thus, America's Most Wanted's lies are his lies.

Maybe the lies would be more palatable if John Walsh was not quite so sanctimonious, not so miserably hateful.  Some will say that John Walsh has his reasons.  Nearly thirty years ago, his son was kidnapped and brutally murdered.  But I remember John Wash from those earlier days.  When he spoke before Congress about missing and exploited children, I saw him as grieving but also as being miserable and hateful, as if he had been that way all along.

Regardless, John Walsh told Congress and he's told the public ever since that what he does is not a matter of hate - just him doing his part to preserve his vision of America.

Well, my vision of America includes a vision of justice, which is to say "justice for all".

John Walsh knows that his show made me appear guilty before the entire nation.  He knows that what was shown on America's Most Wanted was a fraud.  But John Walsh has never lifted one finger to right the wrong done because John Walsh is not interested in justice.  He doesn't care about the innocent lives he ruins.  he cares only about himself. And it is for that reason, more than any other, that John Walsh has been and always will be a fraud.

  Want to talk to Rev. George about his comments ??  Please feel free to contact him: George David Loeb, Jr #292124, Tomoka Correctional Institution, 3950 Tiger Bay Road, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32124, USA.

[Discover Magazine - Letter to the Editor18th May 35 A.C.]

Discover Magazine - Letter to the Editor

18th May 35 A.C.

Discover

Letters to the Editor

90 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York, 10011

Dear Discover,

I am writing in regard to your June article, profiling renowned biologist, Dr Peter Duesberg.  Your writer noted that the good doctor "repeatedly refers to gay people as homos and blacks as schwartzes".  ironic as it may be, it appears that yours is the inappropriate racial commentary.

Homosexual (Homo for short) is the technically correct terminology as opposed to "gay" which is far more a fashion than a description.  Furthermore, in discussing people whose own reckless behavior made them sick (and who expect others to help pay the bill for research and treatment) use of the term "homos", even if derisive, is still probably more respect than is deserved.

As for "schwartzes", the word is German - as is Duesberg - and literally means "blacks", precisely the term you propose as proper in English.  Your cultural ignorance is showing.

For your information, the more common term for "blacks" in German is "neger".  Had Duesberg used this term, we would nevertheless again consider the proper degree respect due - addressing a race characteristics by abject failure, criminality indolence and immorality.

The question of whether black failure is based on genetic limits of capacity or environment may still be a topic among left leaning pseudo-scientists, others ask "Where is the racism and oppression within racially homogeneous indigenous African areas where they remain in a pre-Stone Age state of development - and but for White colonial influence are not for far removed from eating their own young for food ?"

Duesberg (and Watson) are true pioneering geniuses in cancer research and DNA sequencing.  Perhaps impolite, they speak the truth.  Your readers must ask why Discover and so many others lack similar courage.  We must also recognize that your quibbling criticism make the work of these geniuses doubly difficult perhaps delaying cures that may be of benefit to all, both black and White.

George David Loeb, Jr

292124

Tomoka Correctional Institution

3950 Tiger Bay Road

Daytona Beach, Florida, 32124

  Want to talk to Rev. George about his comments ??  Please feel free to contact him: George David Loeb, Jr #292124, Tomoka Correctional Institution, 3950 Tiger Bay Road, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32124, USA.

[USA Politics and Race - All About Osama Obama6th March 35 A.C.]

USA Politics and Race - All About Osama Obama

6th March 35 A.C.

Primaries, caucuses, conventions, nominations, the general election and inauguration.  One thing is certain : In early 2009, the George W. Bush era will finally come to an end, for better or for worse.

We note that many say that with a new president, Americans can do no worse.  We are not so sure.  For we also note that half-breed negro Barack Obama is still among the candidates. His race and his reputation lead us to fear the worst.

* * * * *

Lest we be accused of being racist we note that Obama's bi-racial background and other matters that we will raise here have been covered extensively both in the campaign itself and in the media.  Yet, we think all have missed the key points, perhaps intentionally.

In the 28th January, 2008 issue of "Time", for example, black Harvard University professor, Randall Kennedy, asked - as many others have - whether Obama is "black enough" to appeal to black voters.

This "black enough" phrase is like some sort of dirty masonic code.

When decoded it is an admission by blacks and even by liberal race traitors - they know what all of us should know - black voters are racists that intend to vote for Obama (or anyone) they deem to be "black enough.

But how can Obama ever be "black enough" ?  Perhaps he will be viewed as "black enough" because he isn't clearly white, as are his opponents Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and others.

But let us be clear on this :

Obama's father is a black [Islamic] African; his mother is white - a race traitor perhaps, but white.  Not mulatto, not quadroon, octaroon dusky caste or even high yellow.  She is White.

But as a matter of political expediency that we call PURE SLIME Obama has chosen to portray himself as black

* * * * *

Again, let us be clear on this:

Obama's black African father came to America, mated with a White woman, and returned to Africa, leaving the White woman to raise the half-breed offspring alone.

This is a typical black racial conduct - genetic in root cause, it is true the world over as it is in America.  Male parental neglect and abandonment. - Our View - A man not responsible enough to raise his own children is irresponsible to the very core.

This is the type of man Obama is
or
This is the type of man Obama wants to be. Black and irresponsible - like his father.

* * * * *

Yes, adopting the race of his father in an attempt to corner the black vote is slimy.  And yet, slimy as it is, there is an aspect 100 times more slimy! Slimy enough to make you sick.  We come to that next.

As we noted earlier, Barack Obama was abandoned by his black father.  Obama was, in fact, raised entirely by Whites - his white mother (with notable involvement of his White grandparents)

Thus, Obama's decision to portray himself as black (to be "black enough" for the black voters) is a slimy slap in the face to his mother and his grandparents who bore the burden of raising him.

There is no greater dishonor - period

* * * * *

Despite having lived in diverse locales in his youth (including Indonesia and Hawaii), Obama's background is most like that of the White upper middle class children of that era.  Throughout his high school years that is a notion that Obama steadily sought to reinforce.  It's all there in a nutshell and plain to see in his oft published high school year book photo - he called himself "Barry".  Barry Obama - the Almost White Kid.

* * * * *

Then it was off to college for "Barry".  He didn't go to Howard University or any other of the historically black universities.  Oh no, for Barry Obama, it was Columbia, then Harvard law !  Ivy League all the way.  The ultimate bastions of White snobbery where Barry again sought to fit in, admittedly by "doing a little blow" (illegal and reckless, perhaps this was Barry being a little too black, like his father, a heavy drinker who died young in a fiery auto crash).

Regardless, it was still "Barry", the Almost White Kid, throughout his college years.

* * * * *

Well, we mock Obama for calling himself Barry, it's true.  But what's in a name ?  Actually, quite a lot.

* * * * *

Barry's real full name is Barack Hussein Obama.  Consider how closely the name resembles that of America's most hated enemies :

Saddam Hussein + Osama bin Laden = Barack Hussein Obama. To make our feelings clear on this, we call him Osama Obama.

* * * * *

Finally we note that to overcome the implicit Islamic ties and his former "white enough" stance Obama now has Oprah Winfrey by his side, on the campaign trail.

Funny in a way.

Consider the name "Oprah".

Her mother intended to name her Orpah, after a character from the Old Testament.  Q. What kind of person gets the name of her own child wrong ?  A. The mother of the endorser chosen by Obama.

* * * * *

The fruit doesn't fall far from the tree, they say.

Will Barack Hussein Obama , the man who has lately chosen to be black like his father, someday also choose to be Islamic like his father ?  Will he turn his back on the USA, the nation he seeks to lead, the way he has turned his back on the White Family that raised him ?  We cannot know but his reputation leads us to fear the worst.

Of course, to us, his election as US President would be the darkest day in recent world history - perhaps the beginning of the end.

But, in a way, it doesn't matter: if he is not elected this time, he will continue in politics - Osama Obama is not going away.

Let us make this last point most clear : Osama Obama is not going away unless or until we recognize that this slimy shape-shifter is not white enough, not black enough and not man enough to be worthy of our respect - or the vote of anyone white or black.
  Want to talk to Rev. George about his comments ??  Please feel free to contact him: George David Loeb, Jr #292124, Tomoka Correctional Institution, 3950 Tiger Bay Road, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32124, USA.

[Jew Control of America Exposed : Following the Money12th January 35 A.C.]

Jew Control of America Exposed : Following the Money

12th January 35 A.C.

We begin by stating the obvious. It is the U.S. government that helped create and continues to support the largely segregated Jewish nation of Israel. The support in question now exceeds 8 BILLION dollars annually and no nation receives more. Yet Israel is a tiny nation and not at all impoverished as any other nations are. More importantly Israel is a nation whose racist policies make apartheid-era South Africa appear benevolent. By comparison, to be blunt, U.S. aid to Israel is unneeded and entirely undeserved (by rights, the nation should probably be under UN sanction).

Further analysis shows that support of Israel is actually counter to U.S. political, economic and strategic interests. One obvious point is that support of Israel, a nation with no oil to speak of, angers the many Islamic nations whose oil America depends on. As the old saw goes, it seems obvious that the U.S. is cutting off its nose to spite its face.

Not surprisingly, every survey of the U.S. voting public shows that citizens are overwhelmingly opposed to U.S. aid to Israel, regardless of the amount.

And yet, not a single U.S. Senator, Member of the House or President, has ever mounted a serious effort to discontinue Israeli aid - and none ever will. The fact is this - Jews have purchased the silence of every U.S. politician and both major political parties as well - all bought and paid for by and through a secretive and slimy billion dollar lobbying organization called AIPAC - the American-Israeli Public Affairs Committee.

Here at the Church of the Creator, we call Jewish lobbying bribery. We call it extortion when those who hesitate to take Jew bribes are threatened with financial ruin. Finally, we call acceptance of Jew-Israeli money corruption. We call it cowardice and we call it treason. By and through this treason, wrong as it is, Jews control America. Always have, always will, so long as Jews remain.

We at COTC are proud to say that we are working towards a solution - a final solution.

[The Word holocaust: A New Strategy for White Victory15th November 34 A.C.]

The Word holocaust: A New Strategy for White Victory

15th November 34 A.C.

    We have, in many places, triumphed in the debate.  We have pointed out the many lies.  We have noted the total absence of proof.  Moreover, we have said "if any doubt remains, consider the source".  And yet, despite our best efforts, the lie remains; the hoax continues to be promoted by governments and media the world over - even to this day, nonsensical as it is.

Recently, here in our prison chapel, we had "inter-denominational services".  Of course, this too was nonsense.  It was all about Jewish-Christianity.  There was even a token kike among the so-called volunteers.  Stereotypical in all regards, his name was Sol Rabinowitz.

Like a talking frog, he told us that he was against intolerance - he said,'he knew about intolerance...'. He literally said "... all seven of my grandparents perished in the ovens of Auschwitz".

I alone spoke up.

"SEVEN?  Seven grandparents ?  How's that work, Sol ?"

What followed was a drowning series of remarks about his "extended family" in which aunts and uncles are apparently counted as grandparents.

Then, perhaps unwisely, I said, "OK, what about the ovens, Sol?" [It was at this point, I was asked to leave]

Later, I was accused by fellow inmates of having been insensitive.  It was hopeless to point out that "ovens" were not seriously proposed as a means of execution by anyone [with the exception of Sol Rabinowitz].

As I explained to my fellow Whites that cremation (that is, use of "ovens") is common place even today, as an alternative to burial.  I could feel my audience slipping away.

Such is the inexplicable desire to believe anyone and believe anything when it comes to this so-called holocaust.

And, realizing this, I was angry, not for hours, but for days ....

****

As my anger subsided, I thought deeply - "How can we fight this ?".  Subsequent events provided an answer.

****

Just  a few days ago, inmates here were found to have spit in supposedly clean drink cups.  Later, some servings of food were found to have been literally poisoned with a chemical disinfectant.

In the aftermath, I noted that many inmates were "writing it up".  I termed it "a Holocaust of grievances".

Of course, staff bitching and reprisals were expected.  But, surprisingly, in this instance, there were no reprisals and the only real bitching was by an inmate.

Apparently a stealth kike, the inmate loudly objected to my use of the word holocaust, as an ordinary (lower case) noun.

Continuing, strident and unexpected, the complaint regarding usage quickly became a real eye-opener.  An "ah-hah" moment.

I had never before realized how desperately Jews covet exclusive use of this word; how central the word itself is in promoting their lies - in furtherance of the 60 year old scheme to turn undeserved sympathy into unearned income.

But, now, the weakness is known and thus a new strategy has emerged.

****

To us here at Church of the Creator, it seems obvious that we should use the word holocaust as often as possible, to diminish and ultimately extinguish its shock value and its supposed link to WWII era events.

Yes, holocaust [with a lower case "h"] is just a word.  Meaning "numerous", but of relatively minor significance, it's a word we must begin to use daily.  Perhaps, particularly the word should be used to describe current events in a creative way.

****

I have described the convictions of White House insiders, Jack Abramoff and Irving Libby, as .... "A holocaust of Jewish corruption".

I have described the claim of Iraqi "weapons of mass destruction"and denials of "torture" as .... "A holocaust of lies".

It rained yesterday; today, I proclaimed it .... "A holocaust of gnats!".

I'm just getting used to this myself.  But I see the Jew wince every time I do it.  I foresee widespread usage, leading to long term success.  I see future generations of White children, disputing use of the word in the fact of weakened propaganda.  Yes, I see VICTORY RAHOWA  !! 

With or without any holocaust ....

Want to talk to Rev. George about his comments ??  Please feel free to contact him: George David Loeb, Jr #292124, Tomoka Correctional Institution, 3950 Tiger Bay Road, Daytona Beach, Florida, 32124, USA.