Messages

Welcome to the Forum.

I hope more of those Aussies that were interested in Creativity in the 90's will take the step to get involved again, now that they have an alternative.

R!

I like to go over the 5 Beliefs in my head every so often, not in any ritualised way but just to keep it firm in my head. Doing the same with the 16 Commandments would also be a good habit to get in to.

Reciting something in your head to keep it fresh is hardly a bad thing, if I wish to achieve in school exams I'll be frequently reciting statistics, ideas and formulas in my head to keep them fresh. Even if it were to be done in a ritualised sort of way, this would be similar to children learning the alphabet or reciting their multiplication tables until they're memorised. If saying the 5 Beliefs five times a day helps you remember them and keeps you on your Creative toes, go for it!

There are many reasons.

Creativity has always been a target of law suits, often resulting in property being lost, or trademarks being taken or in the worst cases in Creators being imprisoned. Creativity has also been a target for the lower elements of our race, people who have used Creativity as tool to serve their own personal agenda. Creativity is also an idea that stands outside of the norm, it is anti-Christian, it is not a political party and it is not designed for a specific group of people, whereas Blood & Honour is mostly for Skinheads. Creativity offers something never before available to the White race and in my opinion, the majority of Whites are not ready for it.

However, Creators will continue to march on regardless of the opposition and the obstacles. Creativity will be organised and productive, in order to serve the interests of the White race!

His reply to the previously posted message:

Firstly, I am sorry about my spelling in the first PM. I was going like a bat out of hell and did not proof read it.

Secondly, I would be thinking that you have given me very good information.

Patrick O'Sullivan comes from a break soon.

When he does, I will listen to his side of things and decide the position of stormfront in regards to this situation.

Please allow this to take natural course and thank you for your patience.

Regards,
Boot.

and here is another message I sent him further expanding on my position, his reply is further below:

I didn't mention this in the other message but just to clarify, the trademark Patrick has is legal in Australia only. Stormfront is an American website and so any material that fits his "trademark" is irrelevant as he has no jurisdiction over an American website. The most he can do is sue individual Australians for breaking his "trademark."

I understand you're only protecting the interests of SF but there is obviously no issue.

Cheers.

That is the position I have at the moment, so Patrick wants to make it pretty good.

However, I must do this correctly and thoroughly.

It is my job.

Best regards,
Boot.

So far it looks like Patrick has no case on Stormfront.

My reply to SCB:

G'day,

Thanks for the quick response.

We were waiting for Patrick to do something like this. I am sure you are aware of the character and history of Patrick O'Sullivan, I won't go in to that but I'm sure you have your own opinions.

He does in fact have a "trademark" for the logo and "creativity movement" in Australia - a picture of the online record can be found here. We do not recognise the trademark as Creativity belongs to the White race and not an individual and even legally speaking, our logo and "the Creativity movement" are generic terms. The Creator logo belongs to Patrick as much as the Christian cross belongs to the Pope.

We do not believe there is any legal grounding behind the trademark, the various Creators involved in the Creativity Alliance aren't trying to sell the logo or profit off Creativity - all of our activity is based in "for informational purposes only" and religious instruction.

Patrick is simply trying to own Creativity and make his own personal gang out of it, we reject this and Stormfront should also reject his behaviour as negative and against what is in the best interests of the White race. If Stormfront were to host the logos and information regarding Creativity (within posts), Stormfront would still not be liable and any legal path Patrick decides to take must be with the individual posting the material.

With that said, I greatly doubt Patrick would have the finances or intelligence to launch a civil suit against every individual Creator in Australia and abroad that use our religious symbol and the name of our religion in any way.

Obviously the decision lies with you, I trust you are capable of judging the situation based on what is best for the White race. You should be more than aware of the character of Patrick O'Sullivan, members of Stormfront deserve better than having him as the only promoter of Creativity allowed.

Kind regards,
Hatemonger.