Messages

[DO NOT SUPPORT JEWLENSKY'S BOSH WAR EFFORT]

President Trump simply pointing out the obvious. How silly people are when a nuclear threat doesn't seem to bother them. Just please let Jewlensky collapse. However, liberal Europe and degenerate-niggerized Biden won't do that.

                                      DO NOT SUPPORT JEWLENSKY'S BOSH WAR EFFORT



https://sputniknews.com/20230126/first-come-the-tanks-then-come-the-nukes-trump-calls-on-biden-to-end-crazy-ukraine-conflict-1106735642.html


'First Come the Tanks, Then Come the Nukes': Trump Calls on Biden to End 'Crazy' Ukraine Conflict


Sputnik International (Russia) | 26 January 2023 - Fantine Gardinier


Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Thursday that NATO states sending weapons to Ukraine was "perceived as direct involvement in the conflict" by Moscow, rather than being separate from it.

In a post on his Truth Social platform on Thursday, former US President Donald Trump called on US President Joe Biden to end "this crazy war" in Ukraine before it leads to the use of nuclear weapons.

"First come the tanks, then come the nukes. Get this crazy war ended, now. So easy to do," Trump said.

The former US leader was referring to Biden's decision earlier this week to ship nearly three dozen M1 Abrams main battle tanks to Ukraine as Poland agreed to send its own Leopard 2 tanks as well. Several NATO allies have also recently announced plans to send other light armored vehicles to Ukraine, too.

Trump has railed against the dangers posed by US support for Ukraine since February 2022, when Russia launched its special operation in Ukraine and NATO rushed to prop up the Ukrainian military. He's far from being alone in that, as critics from across the political spectrum and from many NATO states have warned of a variety of dangerous consequences from the conflict, ranging from fuel shortages to the outbreak of thermonuclear war.

Biden has shown his awareness of the dangers of nuclear war, warning of the risk of "Armageddon," but has done so in a way that suggests Russian President Vladimir Putin was threatening to use nuclear weapons. In fact, Putin said Russian nuclear forces had been placed on high alert due to "aggressive" statements by NATO about Russia paying a "severe price" for the operation, and he said nuclear war can have no winners and should never be invoked.

Biden has also ignored several attempts by Moscow to begin negotiations to end the conflict in Ukraine and advised Kiev to abstain from talks as well, pinning their consideration on Russia's withdrawal from Russian-speaking regions that voted to leave Ukraine and join the Russian Federation.

Path to Peace

Moscow launched the operation in February 2022 with the aim of neutralizing the country as a potential base for NATO weapons. The operation came after months of failed talks in which Washington diplomats said Russia's security red lines were "non-starters," and Kiev dramatically ramped up its attacks on rebels in the Russian-speaking Donbass region, where neo-Nazi formations had pushed a war on Russophone Ukrainians since 2014 that had killed nearly 20,000 people by that time.

Moscow now demands Kiev de-Nazify its government and armed forces and declare itself a neutral state, giving up the goal of joining the NATO alliance that is presently written into its constitution.

Trump's Record on Escalation

Ironically, when Trump was president, he was often accused by critics of attempting to start World War 3, variously with Iran, China, and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). In August 2017, amid a tense showdown with US ally South Korea, Trump threatened the socialist state with "fire and fury like the world has never seen" if it continued to make threats against the US. Weeks later, Pyongyang tested its first thermonuclear weapon, and Trump soon proposed creating the W76-2 "micro-nuke," which analysts warned was extremely dangerous because it lowered the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons.

Despite the Russiagate accusations of collusion with Moscow, Trump was no less hostile toward Russia, either. During his tenure, the Pentagon and National Security Council declared a shift in the US' strategic orientation away from the War on Terror and toward what it described as "great power competition" with Russia and China.

Trump also oversaw the continued basing of US forces along Russia's western flank, weapons sales to Ukraine, and pushed ahead plans for the Aegis Ashore base in Redzikowo, Poland, and the overhaul of a similar base in Deveselu, Romania, which are capable of firing offensive strike missiles deep into Russia. He also signed the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), a law passed by the Democrat-controlled Congress that punishes states for buying advanced military equipment from Russia and China, among other makers.

The former president recently restablished control over his accounts on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram, following their suspension after the January 6, 2021, insurrection by his followers. He created the Truth Social platform in response to their suspension, but has so far not used his Twitter account since it was reactivated last October.


Related Article: https://sputniknews.com/20230125/white-house-confirms-sending-31-abrams-tanks-to-ukraine-1106700696.html

[PUTIN VS JEWLENSKY = KNOCK OUT FOR PUTIN IN THE FIRST ROUND!]

A faggot coward Jew calling a tough and skilled White man a nobody, and who he wouldn't meet with is quite hilarious. This kike is a pathetic clown, and he knows it. I don't agree with everything Putin says or does, but he'd kick Jewlensky's a$$ any day of the week - physically and mentally speaking. Putin is a clever political chess player, who in addition knows martial arts. Jewlensky is an unskilled joke wearing tights and high heels, running around in that same faggy green shirt for the past year, pretending he's some sort of superhero. Hah!

                      PUTIN VS JEWLENSKY = KNOCK OUT FOR PUTIN IN THE FIRST ROUND!



https://www.rt.com/russia/570501-zelensky-putin-nobody-talks/


RT (Russia Today)
26 Jan, 2023 10:49
Home Russia & FSU


Zelensky calls Putin a 'nobody'

Ukrainian leader declares that direct negotiations with Russian counterpart are "not interesting" to him


Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky has dismissed his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, as a "nobody" who is not worth talking with. The Ukrainian leader had previously claimed that Putin may not be alive at all.

Zelensky made the remarks in an interview with Sky News, recorded on Wednesday. Journalist Kay Burley asked him what would happen if he was "in a room alone with President Putin" and whether it would help resolve the conflict with Russia. - If he was in a room alone with President Putin, he'd get thrown out the window.

After a long pause Zelensky replied: "It's not interesting for me. Not interesting to meet. Not interesting to speak." - Because he's afraid.

He claimed that Putin was not trustworthy, adding: "I really don't understand who makes decisions in Russia."

"Is it too late now?" Burley asked.

"Too late? Not interesting," Zelensky replied. "Who is he now? After full-scale invasion, for me he is nobody! Nobody!"

When asked about the remarks on Thursday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said they didn't warrant a response. Zelensky was elected on a platform of peace, but failed to deliver, the Russian official said.

"He didn't implement the Minsk Agreements. Moreover, it turned out he had no intention to implement them. He was preparing for war," Peskov assessed, referring to the 2014-2015 peace roadmap for Donbass.

In the same interview, Zelensky acknowledged Russian military advances, which he attributed to a purported indifference to losses by Moscow, and thanked the US and its allies for pledging to supply main battle tanks to Kiev.

The Ukrainian president has previously claimed that he rejected direct contacts with Putin because he was "not certain that the president of Russia, who makes occasional appearances on TV ... is actually [Putin]." - Again, because he's afraid.

"I absolutely do not know whether he is alive, whether he takes decisions or someone else does," Zelensky stated last week, during an event on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, which he attended virtually.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said this month that seeking talks with Zelensky made no sense because the Ukrainian president was not the person determining his nation's foreign policy.

The diplomat cited as evidence Kiev's withdrawal from peace talks, which happened last April, shortly after Moscow accepted in principle Ukraine's proposal for a truce. The draft document reportedly included among its terms Ukraine's neutrality and pledge not to host foreign military forces. Western nations "yanked Kiev's chain and said 'too early'," Lavrov remarked.

[Tucker Carlson: Antifa Faggot Race Traitors is are back in force]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHM-SmffghQ

Tucker Carlson: Antifa Faggot Race Traitors is are back in force

[Biden Free to Commit Any Crime]

Biden Free to Commit Any Crime



https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=3364

[sheeple]

This article is four days old, but thought it was worth putting here. Nothing to say really other than how embarrassing that entire things was, and how pathetic the sheeple are who still hold onto it as gospel. Let it go Morons.

       THERE WAS NEVER A "RUSSIAN" ANYTHING IN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S VICTORY AGAINST CROOKED KILLARY CLINTON



https://www.rt.com/news/569819-whole-russiagate-was-a-lie/

RT (Russia Today)
19 Jan, 2023 22:06
Home / World News

'Russiagate' is dead, but the control of social media that the US government gained from it is here to stay

An academic study has confirmed there was no Russian conspiracy to elect Trump (study link listed below article)

Donald Trump's time as president was dominated by years of mainstream news headlines declaring that his unexpected victory was attributable to Saint Petersburg's Internet Research Agency (aka 'The Russian IRA').

The company reportedly corralled online networks of bots and trolls that perpetuated pro-Trump propaganda in a bid to get the outsider elected at the Kremlin's request. This narrative quickly became widely accepted among US liberals, and remains entrenched today – but a new study decisively shows it to be false.

Debunking a lie

The paper, published in the respected academic journal Nature, investigates the exposure of Twitter users to alleged activity on the social media platform by the IRA during the 2016 US election, "and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior."

The study's findings speak for themselves. For example, 70% of purported IRA-connected posts during that campaign were seen by just 1% of the network's users, "who strongly identified as Republicans."

Coverage of these posts was moreover "eclipsed by content from domestic news media and politicians." The academics also found "no evidence of a meaningful relationship" between exposure to these tweets, and "changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior."

Alleged IRA posts seen on Twitter by users were "overshadowed – by an order of magnitude – by posts from national news media and politicians." For every four IRA tweets published in the last month of the 2016 election campaign, 106 per day from national news media and 35 per day from US politicians were seen on average. In other words, 25 times and nine times more posts respectively.

The academics also probed whether there was any connection between exposure to alleged IRA posts and "changes in respondents' positions on salient election issues" and political polarization, surveying them on "eight major policy issues salient during the election, and respondents' self-reported political ideology." They bluntly concluded that there were not "statistically significant relationships between exposure on any of the issue-based and polarization outcomes."

Extensive data-based analyses were also conducted to "examine the relationship between exposure to Russian foreign influence accounts and vote choice." Again, the conclusion couldn't be more damning – "the relationship between the number of posts from Russian foreign influence accounts that users are exposed to and voting for Donald Trump is near zero (and not statistically significant)."

"This is the case whether the outcome is measured as vote choice in the election itself; the ranking of Clinton and Trump on equivalent survey questions across survey waves; and with the broader measure capturing whether voting behavior more generally favored Trump or Clinton through voting abstentions, changes in vote choice, or voting for a third party."

Social media are part of the problem

These findings may not be news to some. The headline claims of news coverage and reports produced by supposed "disinformation" experts, attesting to the existence of a Russian social media conspiracy to elect Trump, often sounded seismic – the alleged connivance was repeatedly compared to a new Pearl Harbor. But no evidence to support this charge ever emerged.

Take, for instance, an official Facebook investigation into adverts paid for by the IRA. It estimated that 10 million US citizens saw them, although 56% were published after the election. Roughly a quarter were never seen by anyone, and in 50% of cases, less than $3 was spent on a particular campaign.

While 10 million views may sound significant, the new academic study calls for calm:

"One should be skeptical about its potential effects on attitudes and voting behavior. The large body of political science research that examines the effects of traditional election campaigns on voting behavior finds little evidence of anything but minimal effects, even when messages are well-targeted and conducted in politically conducive environments."

Recent #TwitterFiles exposures, wholly ignored by the mainstream media but fully dissected by RT, underline the utility of claims of Russian meddling in Western democratic processes to the US national security state. They showed how Twitter was pressured by American intelligence services, lawmakers, pundits and journalists into extensively investigating alleged Russian disinformation on its platform, following the 2016 election.

After several exhaustive official probes turned up no evidence to substantiate the existence of any Kremlin-backed bot or troll networks, Twitter executives were then successfully threatened with the prospect of restrictions on political advertising – which could've damaged the company's business model – into granting American spying agencies an effective backdoor into their operations. Staffers were reduced to effective middlemen for the US government, censoring content and deplatforming users at the direct request of Washington's power elite.

Despite Twitter's recent takeover by Elon Musk, and the reappearance of many long-banned dissident voices on the platform, how the company operates may not have significantly changed.

For one thing, the swamp of former military and intelligence officials at the company's highest levels, deciding which users can gain traction and which can't, and what users can and can't see, has stopped being drained. The threat of a mass advertiser exodus, which would result in likely bankruptcy in short order, may well have given its new owner cold feet about making further radical changes to the social network, and who runs it.

Twitter might have been launched with the best intentions, but its efficacy for information warfare was clearly recognized early on by Western spy agencies, and it has served for much of its existence as a highly effective tool in this area. As the academic paper testifies though, it has never been exploited by Russia, or Russians, but rather by the very same powerful figures and entities telling Americans it was all Moscow's doing.


Study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-35576-9