Messages

"It is the work and objective of the Church of the Creator...to Arouse, Unite and Organize the White Race and wrench control of our destiny back into our own hands." -Ben Klassen, Founder of the Creativity religion.

A Creator's objective is to organize his Race.

The premise that we will accept low quality people into sensitive positions is faulty, if we maintain  demanding standards.

To me that paragraph you quoted suggests we have something to hide in our strong beliefs. We do not. There is no hidden agenda.  Our goals and program are laid out in no uncertain terms, repeatedly.

We intend to organize the Race, which requires careful organization.

Morris Dees and his SPLC are documented enemies of Creativity. Every Creator should have a special interest in exposing the lying frauds of the SPLC at every opportunity.
---


VDARE.COM - http://vdare.com/cleburne/090408_splc.htm

April 08, 2009
Good News: SPLC loses $50 Million. Bad news: $PLC can afford it

By Patrick Cleburne

Those of us who know and love the Southern Poverty Law Center [SPLC, or more appropriately, in VDARE.com's considered opinion, the $PLC] have been naturally intrigued to see if this wealthy operation would be a victim of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme.

After all, so many other Jewish-linked charities were: for example, the Robert I. Lappin Foundation, The Chais Foundation, the American Civil Liberties Union—not to mention poor Elie Wiesel's foundation. The Madoff massacre was remarkably sweeping.

Immigration patriots are particularly interested in the $PLC because of its recent obsessive smearing of essentially every immigration reform group in sight. This includes naming as a "hate group" not merely VDARE.COM (which has responded by naming the $PLC a "Treason Group") but also the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) which the $PLC has absurdly claimed is "at the nexus of the American nativist movement" along with FAIR's equally harmless fellow Beltway herbivores, NumbersUSA and the Center For Immigration Studies.

This new $PLC obsession is obviously odd because the huge post-1965 influx of unskilled legal and illegal immigrants, whatever else can be said about it, has been an unmitigated disaster for low income blacks—allegedly the $PLC's historic concern. Labor leader Cesar Chavez (ironically an $PLC hero) saw this dynamic clearly in the case of his farm workers, at that time largely native-born Hispanics. It's why the Howard Industries blacks cheered last year's ICE raid on their employer.

Complaints, even from the Left, about the $PLC's lack of interest in black and "Civil Rights" issues, and its extreme interest in money, date back at least to Ken Silverstein's classic The Church of Morris Dees (Harper's Magazine, November 2000) and JoAnn Wypijewski's ferocious defense of her criticism of the $PLC for ignoring local Black causes in her Nation magazine article Back to the back of the Bus (December 2000).

The standard critical assessment of the $PLC's chosen activities is that it is dominated by the extreme personal greed of its founder, Morris Seligman Dees. There are several stories about this in the (now quite extensive) $PLC literature. On this theory, Dees realized some years ago that his most generous supporters were simply more interested in savaging conservative and other politically incorrect groups than they were in the uplifting of blacks, and he responded accordingly.

The $PLC's Form 990 (PDF), which tax-exempt charities must file the IRS, and its Audited Financial Statements  (PDF) are now available for the fiscal year ending October 2008. And the answer to the Madoff matter—no such luck. Our friends apparently escaped unscathed.

But how did the $PLC manage to resist the allure of the so-called "Jewish T-Bill"—an operation which claimed to produce relatively moderate but extremely consistent returns over many years? Would that not be attractive to the $PLC as a prudent 501(c)(3) Charity—as it was tragically to so many others, and to so many Jewish retirees as well?

Answer: absolutely not. The reason the $PLC dodged Madoff was simply that its financial resources are managed astonishingly aggressively. The clear overriding objective: making money. Safe, slightly above-par returns just did not fit the bill.

Of course, this investment objective did cause the $PLC to sustain $51.2 million in "Investment" losses in the Fiscal year closing 10-31-08. But this left the $PLC with some $167.8 million in total portfolio assets at the end of the year.

And the implied approximately 30.5% FY 2008 loss is actually not exceptional. The S&P 500 lost 37.5% over the same period. (Of course, this makes the questionable assumption that it was prudent for the $PLC to be so exposed to stocks, rather than less volatile financial instruments like bonds or money market instruments).

Essentially, the $PLC balance sheet looks similar to what one would imagine for a retired Goldman Sachs partner: property and working capital, plus a huge sophisticated investment portfolio.

As of 10-31-08, the $PLC showed $35.6 Million (18.5% of its assets) in a kind of current account, called the "operating fund", which contains, curiously, all the physical assets including $16.9 million in depreciated real estate (to be fair— apparently no yacht!) This "operating fund" includes an investment pool of $11.6 million, on which losses of $1.2 million were sustained in FY '08. Presumably this is the management's dabbling/fun account.

The balance consists of an investment portfolio, which stood at $156.2 million at 10-31 08. This is termed the "Endowment Fund".

It is important to understand that, according to the $PLC's own Financial Statements, there are essentially no restrictions on this fund. In the Charity world, this is not what is commonly understood by an "endowment", which is usually dedicated to specific purposes, and often confined to spending income only. As Daniel Borochoff, President of the American Institute of Philanthropy, told Bill O'Reilly in 2001:

"They want to build up their reserves just like you'd probably like to be a multimillionaire so you could live off the interest...It's not really an endowment [just] because the board called it that."  (See NPI/SPLC Report II, Pp17-18)

Proof of Borochoff's view of the $PLC strategy arose in 2008. Endowments are usually tapped in poor years, for operating expenses. But the $PLC transferred $4 million from its "Operating Fund" to its "Endowment Fund" last year—a clear demonstration of the management's Scrooge-like priorities.

It is when one examines the details of this "Endowment Fund" that the $PLC's heroic dedication to money-making becomes glaring. P14 of the Financial Statements reveals that of the $156.2 million:

    * $20.7Million (13.3%) was in "Cash and cash equivalents";
    * $18.8Million (12%) was in "Fixed income mutual funds";
    * $21Million    (13.4%) was in "U.S. equity mutual funds";
    * $14.1Million (9%) was in "International mutual funds".

So far, perhaps so good. But then:

    * $44.9 Million  (28.7%) was in "Hedge Funds";
    * $20.6Million  (13.2%) was in "U.S. equity alternative investments";
    * $6.1Million     (3.9%) was in "Private equity funds";
    * $9.9Million     (6.3%) was in "Fixed income alternative investments".

Some venturing into equity alternative investments (limited partnerships, leveraged buyout funds etc. which in 2008 proved to be horribly illiquid) might be permissible for a very large pool of capital seeking to provide for very long term and heavy spending commitments—a university, perhaps, with a massive payroll and plant. But the $PLC has disclosed no such commitments. With 52% of the "Endowment Fund" in these things, the management was clearly swinging for the fences for its own sake.

An idea of the potential problems arising from this exposure appears in Note 4, P15:

"At October 31, 2008, the Center has outstanding commitments to invest approximately $8,300,000 in limited partnerships and LLC's under capital commitment agreements."

This means that in 2009 the Southern Poverty "Law" Center is obligated to spend in on these investment projects more than the $8 million it spent on "Legal Services" in 2008!

Another insight into the $PLC's aggressiveness from P14: the "Operating fund", which functionally appears to be the Center's housekeeping account, had $4.9 Million in "common stock" and "Mutual fund" holdings – 13.8% of reported assets. Again curiously, obligations under the (relatively small) "gift annuity" and "pooled income" programs are held in the "Operating Fund". One might have thought they belonged where long-term investments are housed.

The unmistakable impression is that the "Endowment" is intended to be wholly focused on making capital gains, undistracted by the day to day (or even year to year) financial concerns of running the Center.

Page 14 also piously states:

"The Center's endowment fund maintains a broadly diversified investment portfolio oriented toward equity investments and strategies to take advantage of market inefficiencies. The Center's investment objectives are...achieved in partnership with an active investment advisory committee and external managers."

But there is no mention of the purpose served by hoarding all this money. Particularly given the heavy use of mutual funds, which are not the sort of thing "external managers" are needed to run but which must be selected by someone, the impression is that a great deal of senior management's time goes to grooming this portfolio.

In FY 2008, the $PLC reported raising $32.4 million from the public.

But expenditures came in at only $30.7 million. In the charity world, this is somewhat embarrassing, because competing fund-raisers can argue that a surplus means you don't need more donations.

Expenditures included $8 million on legal services and $12.9 million on "education"—presumably mainly under the tendentiously-named "Teaching Tolerance" program, which seems to mainly consist of glorifying minorities. Fundraising took $5.4 million (16.7% of revenue). (I have seen it suggested that the "Education" expenditure includes much mailing which should be considered fund-raising.)

Officer's salaries took $1,275,725 (3.9%) Highest paid is Richard Cohen, President and CEO, at $348,652. Morris Dees got $336,072, a 2.8% increase. The top five non-officer employees were paid an aggregate of $747,128 (up 2.3%) including $143,206 for Mark Potok (a 3.2% increase).

Non-officer compensation as a whole took 33.1% of income. Once again poor Heidi Beirich did not place.

For perspective, the cost of living in Montgomery, Alabama, where the $PLC has its notorious "Poverty Palace" headquarters, is just 77% of the U.S. national average. Median household income is $41,676.

On the other hand, the $PLC constantly proclaims the likelihood of right-wing violence. And apparently believes it: three of the top five "independent contractors" it reports provide security services. Under these circumstances, it seems strange and ungenerous that the two figures most in the public eye—Mark Potok and Heidi Beirich—should rank so low in compensation.

From its "Endowment Fund", the $PLC gave nothing ($0) to its alleged causes. By contrast, the Chais Foundation, with approximately the same amount of assets but no public fund raising effort, is reported to have given $12.5 million away in each of the last two years.

However, there is nothing to stop charitable foundations giving grants to other 501(c)(3)s!

No doubt in this terrible year—with like-minded charities suffering from the stock market crash, recession, and Bernard Madoff—the Southern Poverty Law Center will be stepping forward to help!

Notice to liberal foundations: contact the $PLC here!

Ask for Morris!

The $PLC has achieved virtually a sacred status with the Main Stream Media. Its pronouncements are effectively accorded Papal Infallibility. But in reality, it is merely a bunch of bigoted ethnic-special-interest thugs.

VDARE.com does not to expect everyone to concede this. But we look forward to seeing how this group of pirates can be defended from the charge of money-grubbing.

It is not possible to better Joan Wypijewski's scathing advice to her liberal readers in The Nation: (You Can't Get There From Here, February 26 2001):

"What is the Poverty Law Center doing...? Mainly making money...the center doesn't devote all of its resources to any kind of fight....A few years ago the American Institute of Philanthropy gave the SPLC an F for 'excessive' reserves. [VDARE.com note: as it still does in its December 2008 Rating Guide] So readers, rip up those pledges to the Southern Poverty Law Center."

Next step: the MSM and Congress ripping up $PLC press releases and its poison-pen lobbying letters.

For those not familiar with the term: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO

COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert and often illegal projects conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation aimed at investigating and disrupting dissident political organizations within the United States. The FBI used covert operations from its inception, however, the formal COINTELPRO operations took place between 1956 and 1971.[2] The FBI motivation at the time was "protecting national security, preventing violence, and maintaining the existing social and political order."[citation needed]

According to FBI records, 85% of COINTELPRO resources were expended on infiltrating, disrupting, marginalizing, and/or subverting groups suspected of being subversive,[3] such as communist and socialist organizations; the women's rights movement; people suspected of building a "coalition of militant black nationalist groups" ranging from the Black Panther Party and Republic of New Afrika to "those in the non-violent civil rights movement" such as Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, and other civil rights groups; a broad range of organizations labelled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society, the National Lawyers Guild, the Weathermen, almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, and even individual student demonstrators with no group affiliation; and nationalist groups such as those "seeking independence for Puerto Rico." The other 15% of COINTELPRO resources were expended to marginalize and subvert "white hate groups," including the Ku Klux Klan and National States' Rights Party. [4]

The directives governing COINTELPRO were issued by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, who ordered FBI agents to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of these movements and their leaders.[5][6]

[That's to be expected from a man who claims to lead White people with statements like, "a movement without God in it is no movement at all." When John De Nugent called me last week and I told him I couldn't support his planned movement because of that one declaration that I'd seen him make, he replied, "Yes, I'm definitely a 'big tent' proponent."Creators are "small tent," building the uncompromising vanguard that rebukes such Jewish nonsense for the sake of the expedient "broader outreach" to Xlings we see in so many non-Creators who claim to lead us. I'd say the same to Ed Steele for his statements last week in support of Jew-spawned Xianity. That's what politicians feel they have to say, I suppose, when testing the waters for a political bid. Neither of these men believe in Xianity, yet they feel they have to not criticize the alien "brain bomb," as Klassen called Xianity, that has been imposed on our kin, for fear of offending the herd animals that still vote. That is some disgustingly thin soup for the nourishment of our long-suffering people.The weak do not lead the strong.]

This might ought to go in "Soap Opera," but it does involve an announced, openly racist presidential candidate and a recent poster to this forum, 'TowardWewelsburg,' as they go back and forth, dealing with issues that should be instructive for Creators.

TW posted this to Vanguard News Network forum. Note that he quotes a post I made here at CreatorForum in the Introductions Section, then links all those eyes from VNN over here to check out the Creativity Alliance and see what all the fuss is about:
---

4 Hours Ago         #676
TowardWewelsburg
Hoheitsträger

TowardWewelsburg's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vinland (NE U.S.A.)
Posts: 294
   
Default
Notice that Mr. DeNugent refused to answer any of my questions, other than to assert that he has, in fact, bedded a Jewess AFTER his "racial awakening."

I did not call you "unsolicited," John, and that is very misleading. You repeatedly urge all WNs to call and speak to you on this thread, if they have something to ask or offer, and I called you with a very specific purpose in mind: to offer you a meeting location in NJ, because your supporter (Burzum88 on ECWU) had asked for my help.

That's right, folks. I called this guy to help him secure a meeting location on private property that couldn't be interrupted, and I did so. He wanted to have a private meeting in NJ following his Boston speech, and I was willing to facilitate that and hear this man out by offering him our hospitality. When April 11th came, his book didn't come out and there was no speech given; John de Nugent stayed in Pa., with no regard for those to whom he gave his word that he was launching this movement on April 11th (including Henrik Holappa), and launched a vicious attack on me for simply saying this was regrettable.

Speaking of unsolicited phone calls, many of you here know and respect Will Williams. This is the e-mail Will sent me last night about Mr. De Nugent:

---------------------------

Hey, Robert!

It sounds like Mr. De Nugent has come a little unraveled. It also sounds like he's hanging with the wrong crowd to get four reports that you are COINTEL-pro after you made such an innocent remark

That's to be expected from a man who claims to lead White people with statements like, "a movement without God in it is no movement at all." When John De Nugent called me last week and I told him I couldn't support his planned movement because of that one declaration that I'd seen him make, he replied, "Yes, I'm definitely a 'big tent' proponent."

Creators are "small tent," building the uncompromising vanguard that rebukes such Jewish nonsense for the sake of the expedient "broader outreach" to Xlings we see in so many non-Creators who claim to lead us. I'd say the same to Ed Steele for his statements last week in support of Jew-spawned Xianity. That's what politicians feel they have to say, I suppose, when testing the waters for a political bid. Neither of these men believe in Xianity, yet they feel they have to not criticize the alien "brain bomb," as Klassen called Xianity, that has been imposed on our kin, for fear of offending the herd animals that still vote. That is some disgustingly thin soup for the nourishment of our long-suffering people.

The weak do not lead the strong. If I were able to post to VNN, Robert, I'd go there and put that in Mr. de Nugent's thread. When my friends are unfairly attacked with such serious, baseless accusations as this I like to come to their defense.

You were right, Robert. De Nugent fears of showing up and giving his speech yesterday turned out to be baseless. Poor example he set.

-Will [Williams]

-------------------------

[Note: WW posted this himself on the Creator forum, so I know he doesn't mind my reposting it here.]
__________________
"Heiden sind alle, die zum Leben ja sagen, denen "Gott" das Wort für das Große Ja zu allen Dingen ist." – F. Nietzsche
---end VNNF post---

I see that after TW posted the above, he further demolished, point by point, our hopeful future POTUS's paranoic obfuscation in subsequent posts.  Mr. DeNugent throws in the towel, expecting TW to accept a truce, but without his apologizing for saying TW is a federal asset, per se. JdN made this comment about me that should get a Creator's juices going:
-

"And if Will Williams, whose Green Beret service and National Alliance service I respect, and who just called me the other day to stand strong against defamation, KNOWS there is no God anywhere in the entire universe, having looked under every rock under every asteroid, well, then he is omniscient and he should be our god."
-
The highlighted portions above between a Creator and a Big Tent Politician "Believer," open the door for competent Creators to jump in and make a sound case for Creativity at a forum full of biological racists/atheists where Creativity has a tarnished image because of its recent unfortunate history. TW is a respected poster there, even if he did a radio show with Bill White, or whatever. I did a radio show with me against three niggers one time, so, what would that make me, a nigger acolyte? 

http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=74431&page=35

I'm banned from VNNF. If an SPGer chooses to post there, however, don't be disrespectful to Mr. DeNugent. Just answer his challenge to me about my belief that there is not a god because I haven't looked under all the rocks yet, much less any asteroids. Tell him you talked to me and I said ,"Yeah, I looked in the Jew Word, their Book of Fables, and my god sure ain't in there."

RAHOWA!

Duel seed line nutcase and friend of Tubby, Pastor Lindstedt, has allowed me to post to his "free speech" discussion board. I started a thread there with the subject title 'Williams v. Covington' about a week ago, offering a $400 reward to anyone providing a valid street address for Defendant Covington.

I hadn't checked in there since, but now see that Covington has posted some of his standard spam from five years past to that thread. So, I get to ask him some questions.

Creators be warned: If you read Covington's post you'll see he repeats his "Benny Buttfuck Klassen" smears.
---

Re: Williams v. Covington

Post by Will Williams » Mon Apr 13, 2009 12:12 am

You're off topic Defendant Covington. Nobody wants to read your 5-year old birthday card to yourself.

I'm glad you popped in, however. You aren't very good at being responsive, but please comment on the fact that both of your estranged brothers, Ben and Forrest, have now confirmed that you are a delusional paranoid schizophrenic, and have been suffering from mental illness at least since you were a schoolboy in Chapel Hill.

For starters, your brother Ben recently said this about you:

Harold tells a story about when he had his great racial epiphany. He
talks about the day he was in school and two or three black kids
cornered him in the bathroom between classes. According to him, the
black kids were up to thuggery and he, bravely, of course, grabbed a
Pepsi bottle, smashed it, and fought his way out, bloodying his foes and
covering himself in glory. He learned from this, of course, that he
could stand up righteously and defend himself as a free white man.

The true story is significantly different. Harold was indeed confronted
by three black kids in the bathroom during class change, but rather than
bravely breaking a bottle and fighting his way through, he cowered in a
corner and urinated in his pants. He waited until class change was done
and went to the office covered in tears and urine. The office called my
mother, she took a change of clothes, picked him up at school.

You talk a lot about cowardice. You write about others "projecting" their own shortcomings onto you.

Isn't it true, Defendant Covington, that all along it has been you projecting your own cowardice and your inability to tell the truth onto others, and not the inverse as you claim?

Is Ben a liar, too. Is Forrest? Forrest said that when you are off your meds your brain chemistry gets all screwed up and you become extremely delusional, like his psychotic friend Wendall Williamson did when he shot and killed those those innocents in Chapel Hill after going off his meds. http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/128924/ He said you should be institutionalized to protect society, just like his ol' friend Wendall is locked away so he doesn't hurt anybody else when he's off his meds.