I've made four or five posts to the OccidentalDissent discussion board with this CA site linked from my name. These folks consider themselves intellectuals and agree with Creators on race and the JQ, but are all over the board on the religion issue, as is usual among so many in that intellectually dishonest crowd. We'll see if anyone from OD visits here as a result.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/07/white-power-usa/#comment-31695 -- White Power USA (the need for WLP's vanguard approach)
#8 Will Williams
Hunter Wallace [OD Administrator]:
"I'm starting to dislike the term "vanguardists." I think "cultists" is a more accurate description of these people. They like to form small cults and wait for a millenarian collapse of American society. At this point, the "vanguard" (or the divine elect) will mysteriously rise to power."
WW:
I've seen a lot of talk about self-styled "vanguardists" and the sorry lot they are. Dr. Pierce seems to be tarred with this vanguard "cult" tag, for one, among all kinds of other off-the-wall smears of him by those who didn't grasp what he was building, or did and saw him as "competition."
Dr. Pierce, unlike all those "vanguardists" who have claimed to be successor groups to his National Alliance, actually understood the vanguard approach and had been operating under it with careful deliberation for at least 25 years when he described it thusly at the first National Alliance Convention in September, 1978:
"Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination."
Simple, huh? From those attracted to the National Alliance's values, its goals and program, many joined as members. From those with the right stuff were chosen the few considered to be the vanguard, that core of trusted, dedicated cadre, staff and other contributors. It was around those trusted members mainly that Pierce was building that mass movement of will and determination.
We didn't worry so much about infiltrators; they come with the territory. The more they come at us, the more they repress us and smear us, the better. Our attitude, operating from a righteous position of strength at all times as men of our race, was "convert 'em or expose 'em."
Of course one of the first things Gliebe & Co. did after hijacking the Alliance, running off Dr. Pierce's Board of Directors and staff of 15 people at the National Office, was to go "big tent" with his "new" NA. He and Shawn Walker removed pages 46-50 from the NA Membership Handbook — the part establishing that Xianity is an ideology opposed to that of the National Alliance. There went Dr. Pierce's vanguard approach with just that one ill-advised expedient blunder. Gliebe's new, Xian-friendly, "broader outreach" backfired on him. He purposefully drove away many of us who were attracted to Dr. Pierce's honest, hard line that made clear that it's not only important what an aspiring comrade's position is on race and the JQ, but, let us say, he should agree on the "spiritual aspect" of our struggle as well. Dr. Pierce's telling his members the unvarnished truth that Xianity is a large part of the problem, not of the solution, was what had set the Alliance apart from all the also-ran orgs that refused to address the negative impact Xianity has had and continues to have on our race for fear of offending Xian sensibilities.
That's why I promote the Creativity Alliance these days. At least there we're all starting back at square one — less Matt Hale & Co. — from the same honest premise of Dr. Pierce's that Gliebe squandered so stupidly, with such facility: Whites need their own religion, one that's not Abrahamic, that doesn't worship the Jew's tribal god YHWH. Gliebe couldn't even spell Cosmotheism, much less explain it.
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/07/white-power-usa/#comment-31695 -- White Power USA (the need for WLP's vanguard approach)
#8 Will Williams
Hunter Wallace [OD Administrator]:
"I'm starting to dislike the term "vanguardists." I think "cultists" is a more accurate description of these people. They like to form small cults and wait for a millenarian collapse of American society. At this point, the "vanguard" (or the divine elect) will mysteriously rise to power."
WW:
I've seen a lot of talk about self-styled "vanguardists" and the sorry lot they are. Dr. Pierce seems to be tarred with this vanguard "cult" tag, for one, among all kinds of other off-the-wall smears of him by those who didn't grasp what he was building, or did and saw him as "competition."
Dr. Pierce, unlike all those "vanguardists" who have claimed to be successor groups to his National Alliance, actually understood the vanguard approach and had been operating under it with careful deliberation for at least 25 years when he described it thusly at the first National Alliance Convention in September, 1978:
"Our task is not to persuade a numerical majority of the American population that we are right but rather to build the numerical minority of those whose values coincide with ours into a majority of will and determination."
Simple, huh? From those attracted to the National Alliance's values, its goals and program, many joined as members. From those with the right stuff were chosen the few considered to be the vanguard, that core of trusted, dedicated cadre, staff and other contributors. It was around those trusted members mainly that Pierce was building that mass movement of will and determination.
We didn't worry so much about infiltrators; they come with the territory. The more they come at us, the more they repress us and smear us, the better. Our attitude, operating from a righteous position of strength at all times as men of our race, was "convert 'em or expose 'em."
Of course one of the first things Gliebe & Co. did after hijacking the Alliance, running off Dr. Pierce's Board of Directors and staff of 15 people at the National Office, was to go "big tent" with his "new" NA. He and Shawn Walker removed pages 46-50 from the NA Membership Handbook — the part establishing that Xianity is an ideology opposed to that of the National Alliance. There went Dr. Pierce's vanguard approach with just that one ill-advised expedient blunder. Gliebe's new, Xian-friendly, "broader outreach" backfired on him. He purposefully drove away many of us who were attracted to Dr. Pierce's honest, hard line that made clear that it's not only important what an aspiring comrade's position is on race and the JQ, but, let us say, he should agree on the "spiritual aspect" of our struggle as well. Dr. Pierce's telling his members the unvarnished truth that Xianity is a large part of the problem, not of the solution, was what had set the Alliance apart from all the also-ran orgs that refused to address the negative impact Xianity has had and continues to have on our race for fear of offending Xian sensibilities.
That's why I promote the Creativity Alliance these days. At least there we're all starting back at square one — less Matt Hale & Co. — from the same honest premise of Dr. Pierce's that Gliebe squandered so stupidly, with such facility: Whites need their own religion, one that's not Abrahamic, that doesn't worship the Jew's tribal god YHWH. Gliebe couldn't even spell Cosmotheism, much less explain it.