Topics

[Alpha Accommodation - where police fear to tread]

Alpha Accommodation - where police fear to tread
Alison Sandy | May 29, 2009


ONLY five minutes' drive from the mansions of Bridgeman Downs in Brisbane's outer north sits a tiny, poverty-stricken community which has a reputation for being one of the city's most dangerous places.

At Alpha Accommodation in Aspley the stench of a cabin destroyed by fire fills the air and residents angrily trudge through large puddles of water left over from last week's storms.

It's a different world and one that is hard to comprehend for an outsider.

It's marred by constant violence, destruction and reckless behaviour – police compare it to walking into Wacol prison.

They would know, they visit almost every night.

Its tenants would also know, as many come straight from that prison.

Fights, stabbings and other criminal activities are common and it seems like no amount of sunshine could bring warmth to this place. [more ...]

That dump should have been bulldozed twenty years ago. I stayed there for a week in 1989 and the description the media gives today is much the same as I would have described it back then. In the week I was there, there was a stabbing in the toilets, fights day and night, and couples copulating in the showers.

Yet, there is one thing the media is missing out on that separates it from every other caravan park I ever lived in: Three-quarters of the population were non-Whites. In those days, almost totally New Zealand Maoris and Australian Abos. Who knows what species of primates populate that zoo now.

I severely doubt that "police fear to tread" Alpha Accommodation. It's more likely the coppers are giving them the same refusal to charge non-Whites with criminal offences as they always do. i.e. Nothing has changed.

@Cailen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4gv7isyXMI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRuxy_4T4CI

They ANC stated that they want to re-build South Africa, but their action does not show it.

The ANC pretends to be a Democratic organisation, that stands for peace, reconciliation, nation building, human rights, and love among all South Africans;
But these videos actually shows the world what they stand for! No wonder there is crime and violence in South Africa!

Nelson Mandela, the saint of the world, does not publicly condemn this intimidation, disregard for human rights, crime & violence in South Africa, but he won a Nobel Prize for peace!

The international media keeps quite and does not ask Nelson Mandela questions about his hate speech. The white person in the video is Ronnie Kasrils, a Jew. It is not a European singing to kill white people.

There is currently blatant disregard by the ANC Government of the South African constitution. Article 235 of the South African constitution makes provision for Self-determination, but no group is allowed to take up this right. They have to be dominated and suppressed by the hate filled African National Congress (ANC) Government and its supporters, whom actively withhold this right from minority groups, whilst the International community looks in the other direction- pretending not to see it!

More information: http://sagenocide.blogspot.com

[ChristINSANE for Israel]

ChristINSANE for Israel
Update March 2023
The original Video was removed. Try another from these Loonies.
https://www.youtube.com/@ProclaimHisWord2007/search?query=israel

Ever wondered why an atheist is never voted into the US Senate? One reason is because Israel wouldn't allow it. Imagine an atheist, White president spouting verbal diaharea like that? Would never happen.

Even a White Christian president who says anything contrary to the benefit of Israel and Jews is given a swift kick up the jacksey.

March 1, 2002

Christian evangelist, Reverend Billy Graham openly voiced a belief that Jews control the American media, calling it a "stranglehold" during a 1972 conversation with President Richard Nixon, according to a tape of the Oval Office meeting released Thursday by the National Archives.
 
"This stranglehold has got to be broken or the country's going down the drain," the nation's best-known preacher declared as he agreed with a stream of bigoted Nixon comments about Jews and their perceived influence in American life.
 
"You believe that?" Nixon says after the "stranglehold" comment.
 
"Yes, sir," Graham says.
 
"Oh, boy," replies Nixon. "So do I. I can't ever say that but I believe it."
 
"No, but if you get elected a second time, then we might be able to do something," Graham replies....

Elected a second time? Ever heard of Watergate?


@Cailen.

[Ian Plimer: A question of faith]

Ian Plimer: A question of faith

Hendrik Gout | 25/04/2009

http://www.independentweekly.com.au/news/local/news/general/ian-plimer-a-question-of-faith/1495699.aspx

History is littered with grand mistakes. Columbus thought the West Indies looked distinctly oriental, Hitler and Napoleon believed the Russian winter would defrost like a fridge held open, and IBM chairman Tom Watson was convinced there'd be a world market for about five computers.

Then there's the question of faith: that is, the belief in gods and deities. The world once had thousands of religions, and to challenge these beliefs meant death. Ancient Greeks built temples which started at Aphrodite and ended at Zeus, animists believed that plants had souls, and ancient hunter-gatherers held that rivers and mountains were created by giant crocodiles or snakes.

A giant cod did not dig the River Murray, and we know that because of the work of geologists and geographers. Since the beginnings of religion 300,000 years ago, science has challenged faith. Science is evidence, not belief, and scientists don't burn other scientists at the stake because they disagree with each other. But the belief in human-caused global warming, says one scientist, has become the new religion.

"The history of the world is written in the rocks," says Adelaide University geologist Professor Ian Plimer. "We can tell when the earth was born, when the atmosphere developed and the gases which comprised it. We know that continents drift and mountains uplift and erode. If you know the alphabet, if you can read the rocks, you can go back 4.567 billion years to the formation of the world itself."

Plimer is a genial man, 62 years old and with the energy of a new-born gazelle. He's rushing from television interviews to appointments on radio. He's been to his printers and publishers and he's in Adelaide between trips to Broken Hill and Wagga Wagga. It's a busy schedule.

In the boot of his Mercedes he has a box of books, his new opus Heaven and Earth. He parks the car on a steep hill in Beaumont, hands a copy of the book to his passenger while he meets his wife Jill and a real estate agent. As he inspects the house for sale, the real estate agent's parked car rolls down the hill and stops with a crunching noise at the first solid obstacle, which the rear of Jill's car. The professor is unfazed.

"There's space in that house for a library," he says gleefully. "I've got 75 linear metres of books and Jill has the same. We need a house with space. The cars should have been parked with their wheels turned into the gutter on a slope like that but - there's space for a library."

And then the professor moves heaven and earth, literally and figuratively. The book, 500 pages of literature, is an argument against the belief or the faith, as Plimer sees it, that human activity causes global warming. A posse of critics from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, environmental groups and scientists from other disciplines are now out to lynch him. The mild-mannered professor's Heaven and Earth is figuratively tearing his world apart.

"Start with science," Plimer says. "Ignore faith. Science is evidence, not belief." And then he starts with his history of the planet, beginning at the beginning and ending far into the future.

"The world's climate has always changed and always will," he says. "The speed and amount of modern climate change is neither unprecedented nor dangerous. The temperature range observed in the 20th century is in the range of normal variability."

This sounds heretical. Don't the world's eminent scientists agree that humans are burning fossil fuels at an unprecedented rate, that this combustion is releasing carbon dioxide at a similarly unprecedented rate, and that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas? Won't human-made global warming cause wild and unpredictable weather, melt polar icecaps and fry polar bears? Aren't Pacific Islanders going to be flooded out of house and home? Won't there be malarial mosquitoes up and down the high latitudes? Aren't we doomed?

Plimer weaves the Mercedes through the traffic on the way to his next appointment. "Methane is the most potent greenhouse gas," he says before answering. "The effect of driving a diesel car 10,000 kilometres is equivalent to the amount of methane a cow produces in a day."

Yes, but what about polar bears? They don't drive and they don't chew cud.

Plimer stares through the windscreen, wondering where to begin. A starting point may be his previous book, A Short History of Planet Earth, published by ABC Books before the climate change debate really heated up. It talks about earth's encounters with the killer asteroids, the rise and spread of the continents, the appearance of life, mass extinctions and really major climate changes that shaped the life and look of earth.

It even makes a passing reference to some minor animals known as hominids.

"For 80 per cent of the earth's 4600 million years, our planet has been a warm, wet greenhouse planet. Greenhouse conditions are normal. Polar ice caps are abnormal," he says.

"Even 2000 years ago the earth was considerably warmer than now. The Romans were scantily clad, and growing oranges and grapes in northern England."

In Plimer's geological timeframe, 2000 years is less than a modern meteorologist's mini-second. Plimer sees the climate change much as we see changes in daily weather; it can be freezing in the morning, warming up towards noon with an afternoon thunderstorm, then rain and hail followed by a starry night with another frost.

To a man whose scientific discipline measures millions of years, the world's climate is always changeable and variable. The reason we don't notice is our incredibly short lifespan as a species and our incredibly short lives as individuals. If we'd been around as long as algal mats called stromatolites, like those at Shark Bay in West Australia which haven't changed in 2724 million years, we'd have a truer perspective.

"The Dark Ages between 535 and 900 AD were a terrible time to be alive," he writes in Heaven and Earth. "Sudden cooling took place. It was cold, there were famines, war, changes of empires and stressed humans succumbed to plague. Around 540 AD it was so cold trees almost stopped growing. This was a global event because it is also recorded in tree rings from Ireland, England, Siberia and North and South America."

The Black Sea froze. Ice formed on the Nile. South America was gripped by drought; the Mayan civilisation collapsed.

The Dark Ages ended as quickly as they began and the world began to warm. This was the Medieval Warming from 900 to 1300 AD.

"The amount of land devoted to agriculture increased and fields crept up to higher altitudes where farming had not previously taken place. Europe was warm and rainfall was higher. New cities were built and the population increased from 30 million to 80 million. At the same time the thousands of temples at Angkor Wat in SE Asia were built. In China these warmer conditions led to a doubling of the population in 100 years. The Medieval Warming was the zenith of Muslim imperialism, culture and science. Economies boomed."

And then came the Little Ice Age, and it all went wrong again. As Plimer tells it, the world warms and cools as quickly as a steaming hot bath goes tepid. He writes of giant undersea volcanoes spitting out more carbon dioxide than people have released since the start of the industrial revolution, of terrestrial volcanoes like the Toba eruption on Sumatra a mere 74,000 years ago which threw so much acid aerosols and dust into the atmosphere that the human population was reduced to as few as 4000 individuals. We were nearly wiped out, just like 99.99 per cent of all the world's species have since life began. Becoming extinct is something most plants and animals do, and which the rest are still practising.

Unlike the ancient Greeks or the Stone Age hunters, Plimer doesn't believe that gods or beasts created the earth or its life. Nevertheless there's something of a missionary zeal about the man; he'd love to convert the listener. He talks of glaciers reaching down to the shores of the Mediterranean, of their retreat and the spread of hominids to the very north, of Viking settlements on a lush and pleasant Greenland. All these changes, hot and cold, happened well before Man started his lawn mower, before the internal combustion engine, before the Industrial Revolution or Emissions Trading.

So why is his voice seemingly the only one to argue that humans aren't responsible for global warming? How can he be right and all the other scientists wrong?

If Plimer is irritated by the question he doesn't show it. In fact, a smile spreads across his worldly face.

"Now that's very interesting," he says. "The media went into years of brouhaha about global warming and fellow travellers boarded the bandwagon at every opportunity. The cause became fashionable especially among climate experts such as Robert Redford, Barbra Streisand, Meryl Streep and numerous other show business folk. Al Gore went from strength to strength and even compared 'true believers' such as himself to Galileo. Those who had other scientific views were attacked.

"The international panel on climate change gathered many climatologists, meteorologists, environmentalists and political activists. Its first report was in 1990. Three working groups had authors who contributed to a series of chapters under the guidance of lead authors. These people are touted as the 2500 scientific experts who constitute a consensus. In the 1996 report on the impact of global warming on health, one contributing author was an expert on the effectiveness of motorcycle helmets. That author had also written on the health effects of mobile phones. Other authors were environmental activists, one of whom had written on the health effects of mercury poisoning from land mines. If a land mine explodes, the last thing one thinks about is the health effects of mercury poisoning.

"The IPCC process is related to environmental activism, politics and opportunism. It is unrelated to science."

There is much in Plimer's book which could make the blood boil, if not the oceans evaporate. According to the geologist, deniers of human-caused global warming have become the new sceptics, the distrusted, the heretical.

IN THE EARLY 1980s, a team of palaeontologists and archaeologists was excavating a cave on the banks of the Franklin River in Tasmania. They found there evidence of Stone Age man dating back 22,000 years, the most southerly people on the planet at that time.

"Tasmania then was much colder and drier," explained ANU archaeologist Dr Rhys Jones during the dig. "People had walked across a flat plain from what's now Victoria to what is now Tasmania. They arrived in the (Tasmanian) south-west and sheltered in this cave, using it for more than 7000 years.

"Then the climate became much wetter and warmer. The grasslands on which the people depended gave way to thick, impenetrable forest. The forest squeezed out the people, and they were forced to leave.

"The scale of that warming was very quick, and the flooding of Bass Strait incredibly rapid. It would have been possible for a grandfather to sit on the shore of Tasmania, point across the vast sea that's now Bass Strait, and say to his grandson: 'I walked across there.' It flooded in a generation."

Now that's climate change. Archaeologists have found the remains of villages on the bed of what's now the Black Sea before it was either black or sea. There are rock paintings of people herding cattle in what's now the Sahara Desert. Just a few hours north-east of Adelaide is the Mungo Lakes national park, where there's evidence of some of the earliest hominid occupation on Australia around what was once a huge inland sea. There was a time when Lake Eyre and Lake Torrens were fresh, when the Murray River flowed out to sea near Port Pirie. And if you really want to imagine climate change, think of the Himalayas as a boring flat plain or of South America smacking into North America and stopping equatorial currents between the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans.

The story of climate change is the story of the earth itself, of life beginning and often ending, of asteroids and comets smacking into planets and wiping out up to 96 per cent of all marine genera. Were it not for climate change, we might still be shrews scurrying in the night to hide from carnivorous reptiles. Climate change, argues Plimer, is driven by the sun, by eccentricities in the earth's orbit and rotation, by geological and astronomical forces so strong that humans' influence is relatively puny.

But Plimer's latest book, its kindest critic will acknowledge, stays away from sweeping adventures in geology. Desperate to avoid generalities, eager to explain every scientific nuance, it's packed with 2311 footnotes, almost all of them scientific. Al Gore's film is Muzak compared with Plimer's symphony.

"Most scientists are anarchistic, bow to no authority and construct conclusions based on evidence," he writes. "Matters of science cannot be solved by authority or consensus. Scientific evidence is unrelated to politics, ideology, popular paradigms, world views, fads, ethic, morality, religion and culture. If you are a Buddhist, Baha'i or Baptist, the speed of light is still about 299,792.5 kilometres per second. If it is dark, the speed of light is still about 299,792.5 kilometres per second."

And that's about the speed that human-caused climate change believers will respond to Professor Plimer's tract. Few arguments ignite the passions as much as this. Religion comes close, and that too is a belief system where adherents of one faith are so convinced of their own god's supremacy that they will go to war to win converts, is the most grievous mistake to litter history.

Just above Plimer's own basement office at the University of Adelaide is more salubrious accommodation of Barry Brook, who sits in the Sir Hubert Wilkins Chair of Climate Change. They argue, they disagree, and they are equally stimulated by the other's debate.

After all, we now know that the world's circumference is three times the size Columbus thought it was, and that a northern summer will be followed by a Russian winter.

And we know IBM's Tom Watson was wrong. Five computers will never be enough, even just to do climate modelling.

[The Jewish Supremacist is a paranoid, selfish creature that requires constant reassurance and attention. If you leave it alone and treat it as an ordinary human being, it will feel insulted and be sure to mention the Holohoax and accuse you of anti-Semitism in order to gain attention. Ignore the Jew on a national or global scale, and the Jewish Supremacist organisations will scream about imagined anti-Semitism and Holohoax Denial in order to remind you that it is they that control your world.Have doubts? Try and ask a legitimate question about any of the strange myths of the Holocaust. Ask your state and federal representatives why they kowtow to the demands of Jewish Supremacist organisations? Ask enough legitimate questions and you too can be an anti-Semite.]

The Jewish Supremacist is a paranoid, selfish creature that requires constant reassurance and attention. If you leave it alone and treat it as an ordinary human being, it will feel insulted and be sure to mention the Holohoax and accuse you of anti-Semitism in order to gain attention. Ignore the Jew on a national or global scale, and the Jewish Supremacist organisations will scream about imagined anti-Semitism and Holohoax Denial in order to remind you that it is they that control your world.

Have doubts? Try and ask a legitimate question about any of the strange myths of the Holocaust. Ask your state and federal representatives why they kowtow to the demands of Jewish Supremacist organisations? Ask enough legitimate questions and you too can be an anti-Semite.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/story/0,28348,25486725-5014239,00.html

Hate goes viral on social networking sites

MILITANTS and hate groups are turning to social networking websites like Facebook and MySpace to recruit new members, a report says.

The report by Jewish human rights group the Simon Wiesenthal Centre noted a 25 per cent rise in the number of "problematic" groups on social networking sites in the last year.

"Every aspect of the internet is being used by extremists of every ilk to repackage old hatred, demean the 'enemy', to raise funds and since 9/11, recruit and train Jihadist terrorists," the centre said.

Examples of what the report calls "digital terrorism and hate" range from a Facebook group named "Death to gays" in Croatian to a YouTube video of a Koran being burned and various sites promoting militant groups such as Hezbollah, the Taliban, al Qaeda and Colombia's FARC.

The group, named after the renowned Nazi hunter, has been monitoring use of the internet by extremists for over a decade. It said the rise of social networking sites such as Facebook had accelerated the spread of racist and bigoted views in recent years.

It said Facebook officials had met with its experts and pledged to remove sites that violate its terms of usage, "but with over 200 million users, online bigots have to date outpaced efforts to remove them".

Hard to eradicate

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the centre, said Facebook recently removed several Holocaust denial sites, including one that featured a cartoon of Adolf Hitler in bed with Anne Frank, whose diary written in hiding from the Nazis in Amsterdam is among the best known stories of the Holocaust.

"The main social networkers understand they have a problem," Mr Cooper said.

"The company that's tried to do its best so far has been Facebook, yet we've seen that sometimes your best isn't enough to eliminate a problem."

He pointed out a YouTube user whose racist content had caused his postings on the site to be taken down repeatedly, but who simply creates a new user profile, or channel, and posts the material again, boasting that it is his 64th channel.

Extremist groups are also setting up their own social networking sites, the report said, picking out one called New Saxon described as "a social networking site for people of European descent" produced by an American Neo-Nazi group called the National Socialist Movement.

Other groups have created online games such as one created by an Iranian organisation called "Special Operation 85 – Hostage Rescue", and one called "Border Patrol" in which the player has to shoot Mexicans, including women and children, as they try to come over the border into the US.

Leena Shehadeh, a 17-year-old who attended a presentation of the report with her class in New York, said such games and racist language are often treated as jokes by her generation.

"We didn't live through the Holocaust, we didn't live through slavery," she said during an audience discussion.

"So people see it as a joke, until something bad happens."

What, no mention of us? LOL

The garbage from the Wiesenthal Center is the standard that comes out every year to two years which the media and politicians are only to happy eat up and regurgitate for a couple of months until the next Abo, Jew or Muslim gets offended over nothing and starts whinging again to attract money and attention.

What offended me were the comments from Australians against freedom of speech. Free speech is no longer recognised unless it has a politically correct bent to it. It's not new, but it is getting worse. If you are in a crowd of people, it takes the normally silent majority to grow some balls and vocalise any beliefs that are not politically correct before the rest will feel safe enough to speak up. Yet, if one politically correct nutter wants to demonize you or I because of his or her delusional  Marxist beliefs, the crowd will follow the nutter and howl for your blood.

Grow some brains and balls, Australia. Learn to speak in a rational tone that everyone can understand. Be staunch in your views and don't hold back - anywhere. Do that and you will find that the politically correct nutters are the minority. We are still the majority.

My comment, if they post it.

In America they have La Raza - an Hispanic group which stands at the side of the road abusing people and telling them to go back to Europe, Black Muslims that say White people are the product of the devil, Black supremacists, Jewish supremacists, Native American supremacists, Rastafarians, to name but a few ... most of which are duplicated in Australia. Do we hear about them? No. They are the politically correct, and the politically correct can hate anyone or any group with impunity.  But have one person who is not part of the politically correct crowd question their own loss of rights or political manipulation of historical events and they are called "Nazis," "racists," "haters" and "anti-Semites." The way politicians and the media push a totalitarian left wing ideology in Australia and with the general gullibility of  Australians, I'm surprised that there's any freedom of speech left in this country at all.

@Cailen.

[@Cailen.]

Robert the Bruce, King of Scots.

He took a defeated race and nation that was under the heel of a tyrannical invader. Fought and defeated said invader. He brought Scotland out of the dark ages, instilling a racial pride over and beyond clan or tribal pride that has continued for almost a thousand years.

He also envisaged a "Pan-Gaelic Greater Scotia" with his lineage ruling over both Ireland and Scotland. Although his brother Edward was crowned High King of Ireland, a "Pan-Gaelic Greater Scotia" never came to pass.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_I_of_Scotland

@Cailen.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/6207373/Actress-Tilda-Swinton-is-descendant-of-Robert-the-Bruce.html

An anti-prejudice advertisement that the ABC (Australia) was not allowed to broadcast.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkcUq1LBdaA

If you wish to keep it, go to http://keepvid.com to

Personally, I thought the ad was just OK

[Dr Frederick Toben Sentenced to Three Months Prison]

Dr Frederick Toben Sentenced to Three Months Prison

https://sacreator.com/dr-frederick-toben-sentenced-to-three-months-prison

https://web.archive.org/web/20210818042136/http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/

Doctor Frederick Toben of the Adelaide Institute http://www.adelaideinstitute.org has been sentenced to three months prison for refusing to kowtow to Jewish supremacist "Holocaust" dogma, in which six million Jews were supposedly murdered by various means including cyanide gas, by the Nazis during WWII. He has also won a fourteen day reprieve to file papers for an appeal.

"I've mentally prepared myself to go inside for a few weeks or months," said Doctor Toben.

"Anyone who expresses an opinion should not be silenced because someone else is offended, but my opinions have been criminalised.

"How could I regret having done something in good faith?"

Whether the death of one Jew or twenty million Jews is a holocaust, is for Jewish people to decide. Yet, for them to exaggerate the numbers of Jewish dead by millions, in order to extort sympathy and money from the rest of the world is an insult to history, to German people and to the Jewish people themselves.

In Europe, Canada and Australia, Jewish supremacist groups have convinced lawmakers and judges that those who refuse to believe the myth that the German people deliberately caused the deaths of six million Jews during WWII, and express their lack of belief in public are automatically guilty of a crime in a similar vein to murder.

Believe you me, this is not an overstatement. Jewish supremacist groups often speak of people who "deny the Holocaust" as horrific latter day monsters who intend to exterminate the Jewish race at the first opportunity.

The facts: Six million Jews did not die at the hands of the German people during WWII. The brutal murders of four million Jews at the supposed "Death Camp," Auschwitz, have since been found to be false. In all, approximately one million people of all races died at Auschwitz. There were no shower-cum-gas chambers. There were no shrunken Jewish heads. There were no lampshades made from human skin. And there were no bars of soap manufactured from the fat of dead Jews. These are facts that have been accepted by historians around the world - but continue to be denied by Jewish supremacists who use these fantastic tales as weapons of mental destruction.

The "Holocaust" is naught but a lie of majestic proportions. Bowing to Jewish supremacists, the Australian Federal Government has decreed that this hoax upon history must be taught to all schoolchildren. This is a veritable rape of innocent minds before they are mature enough to determine what is real and what is false dogma, and it should be stopped.

I do not believe in the "Holocaust" as portrayed by Jewish supremacist groups. I do not believe six million Jews were murdered by the Germans during WWII. At the very best, I determine it to be a Holohoax. If my beliefs are criminal, then lock me up with Doctor Toben. At least I'll be in good company.

6 million minus 3 million = 6 million?

Q. If the Jews didn't die, where did they disappear to?
A. Israel, America, South Africa, New Zealand and Australia.

Visit Doctor Toben's website at http://www.adelaideinstitute.org

@Cailen.

Torrent Search: Star Trek

http://thepiratebay.org/search/star%20trek

The 2009 Reboot - It was ... OK.

Rip off whatever you want. Watch and Delete. That's all Hollyweird are good for.

[Austrian hotel bans Jews]

Austrian hotel bans Jews

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25459759-5005962,00.html

A HOTEL in Austria has outraged local tourism and fellow hotel owners by banning Jewish guests.

The Haus Sonnenhof apartment hotel in the village of Serfaus, Tyrol, is said to have turned away a Jewish family because of "bad experiences" in the past, the daily Tiroler Tageszeitung reports.

The hotel owner allegedly emailed the family and told them although the room was free, she did want to take in Jewish guests.

The Haus Sonnenhof's reaction has angered other hotels in Serfaus, which has become popular with orthodox Jewish tourists in recent years.

"One such incident could destroy all the hard work by others in the travel industry," Hotel Alpenruh-Micheluzzi owner Petra Micheluzzi told the German Press Agency, DPA.

She said this was a view echoed by local and regional tourism officials.

The father of the rejected Jewish family has reportedly shunned the village of Serfaus and taken the family elsewhere to holiday.

"I don't want to spend my vacation in such a racist nest, and I will inform all my friends about what is going on in Tyrol," he told DPA.


Comments:

We all decry the small mindedness of the Hausl Sonnenhof, and many point at them and cry "racist" for pre-judging an entire group of people on the basis of a "bad experience" in the past. At the very same time the, the father of Jewish family have done the exact same thing, describing the village of Serfaus as a "racist nest" and shunning all of them on the actions of just one hotelier. The claim of racism is so easy to make, but all too often the alleged victims behave just as badly as the alleged perpetrators.

Posted by:

Glen Gitsham of Adelaide

9:09am today

I don't believe in the racism word anymore, and those who use it are not very intelligent. It's a word that people hide behind to avoid criticism and blame all their ill's in life.

Posted by: john of sydney 9:07am today

2 wrongs dont make a right here we have a hotel saying it is banning a family it says because it's jewish or bad experience before and then we have a jewish family saying all jews should stop going there ban the hotel not the whole town extremes on both sides

Posted by: David Armistead of chelsea 8:56am today

I would think that you wouldn't base your opinion of a place simply by the first hotel you try and book. I would also think that all the other hotels would love to have the extra business if this bloke is giving it away.

Posted by: Kato of Canberra 8:50am today

So banning Jews from a Hotel they consider racist, but banning Palestinians from their own cities & country isn't?

Posted by: Hard to believe of Brisbane 8:48am today

The above comments in the South Australian newspaper, the Adelaide Advertiser, (which incidentally, is where Rupert Murdoch began his multimedia empire) show that White people are waking up to the complete and utter tripe of the Jewish and Marxist agenda. They no longer have the expected singular knee-jerk reaction to keywords such as "racist." These comments are positive proof that we do have a chance as a race, and we do not need to be the extreme of the extreme of the extreme to reach our desired goal of freedom from Jewish influence and to bring about a White world as soon as possible.

@Cailen.

[AIPAC]

In his Dictionary of Politics, Walter John Raymond defines "Jewish Lobby" as "A conglomeration of approximately thirty-four Jewish political organizations in the United States which make joint and separate efforts to lobby for their interests in the United States, as well as for the interests of the State of Israel."

In a 2004 speech, J.J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of The Forward, stated: "The Jewish lobby ... is actually more than just a dozen organizations. The Anti-Defamation League, The American Jewish Committee, Hadassah, of course, AIPAC."

In his book Jewish Power, Goldberg writes that in the United States the "Jewish lobby" for decades played a leadership role in formulating American policy on issues such as civil rights, separation of church and state, and immigration, guided by a liberalism that was a complex mixture of Jewish tradition, the experience of persecution, and self interest.

In his 1987 work The Lobby: Jewish Political Power and American Foreign Policy Edward Tivnan writes that a "full-fledged 'Jewish lobby'" was created in 1943 when "delegates from thirty-two national Jewish organizations met in Pittsburgh to decide upon the role that the American Jewish community would play in representing Jewish demands after the war and helping to build Jewish Palestine."



AIPAC

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is an American lobbying group that advocates for pro-Israel policies to the Congress and Executive Branch of the United States. It has been described as one of the most powerful lobbying groups in Washington.



Australia, as such, supposedly has no Jewish lobby. Even to suggest that there is a Jewish lobby is considered anti-Semitic, as happened a couple of years ago when a politician caused an uproar in the press and political circles when she spoke of an Australian Jewish lobby in Federal Parliament.

However, there is a Jewish lobby which is made up of many groups which are all based in Israel and inextricably intertwined with eachother and the current political system. As in the USA, the Australian Jewish lobby advises State and Federal Governments on everything from defence, foreign relations and immigration to hatecrime laws, censorship, and freedom of speech issues relating to pro-Israel and allied causes.

AIJAC
"The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) is the premier public affairs organisation for the Australian Jewish community.

Through research, commentary, analysis and advocacy, AIJAC represents the interests of the Australian Jewish community to government, politicians, media and other community groups and organisations." From http://www.aijac.org.au



AICC
"The Australia-Israel Chamber of Commerce (AICC) is Australia's pre-eminent international Chamber of Commerce and one of the country's most prestigious and active national business organisations. The AICC's national membership exceeds 1,000 leading Australian companies across a broad range of industry sectors."

"The AICC has offices in Sydney, Melbourne, Adelaide, Brisbane and Perth, as well as in Auckland and Tel Aviv." From http://www.aicc.org.au

The AICC website sponsers:

A selection of Israeli companies which operate in Australia can be found at http://www.israeltrade.org.au/localoffice/local.html

"The AICC is honoured to have as its Governors these outstanding individuals who ... are all great supporters and friends of the AICC and Israel:"

Mr Chris Anderson
Mr Anthony Berg AM
Professor Adrienne Clarke AC
Mr Victor Fonda AO
Mr Charles Goode AC
Mr John Gough AO CBE
Ms Margaret Jackson AC
Mr Graham Laitt
Mr Paul O'Sullivan       
Mr Isi Leibler AO CBE
Mr Mark Leibler AO
Mr Bob Mansfield AO
Mr David Mortimer AO
Mr Phillip Scanlan AM
Dr Paul Simons AM
Mr Stan Wallis AC
The Hon Neville Wran AC QC (Former NSW Premier)

The Hon Kevin "KRudd" Rudd MP, Prime Minister of Australia, address to AICC condemning anti-semitism and honouring a Jew as the "greatest Australian." Listen:

MP3

- Flash page.




Another sector of the Jewish lobby in Australia, the B'nai B'rith Anti-Defamation Commission (ADL in the US) asks: Are the allegations about a 'Jewish Lobby' true?

"All interest groups lobby governments. Representative democracy works on the assumption that ordinary people with interests can have those interests represented in the decisions of government. The claim of a Jewish or pro-Israel lobby has become a defamation because it is used pejoratively to imply that Jewish lobby groups are disproportionately powerful and subversive, and anti-democratic." From http://www.antidef.org.au

Need more?

• [urlhttp://www.join.org.au/a-to-z.htm]The A to Z of Jewish Australia on the Internet[/url]
• http://www.jewishaustralia.com/community.htm
• The National Archives in Canberra

This is only an introduction to some of the facts. It is up to you to research and find the truth for yourself. I believe that if I was to research and supply you with all of the information, you would still refuse to accept it as the truth because it has come from someone whom the media, state and federal attorney generals has declared an anti-semite. You have the tool at hand ... now go and prove me wrong.

Reverend Cailen Cambeul.
"Un-Australian, anti-Semitic, racist," and proud of it.

[Machineguns found in latest bikie raid]

Machineguns found in latest bikie raid

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25416131-5001021,00.html

A PILE of police uniforms and a police badge were found with a stockpile of weapons including machineguns and tasers during a raid linked to outlaw bikie gangs yesterday.

Police went to a house in Kogarah about 7.30am where they found an arsenal including a ramming device, riot gear, night vision goggles, bullet-proof vests and ballistic helmets, an AK47, machinegun, handguns and ammunition.

Gallery: What the police found

A 20-year-old man was arrested at a cafe on Kent St in the city at 1pm.

He was last night at St George Police Station assisting with inquiries.

St George local area commander Detective Superintendent Helen Begg said police led a four-pronged attack, with ACC detectives joining St George police and the SCC's Gang Squad to execute the search warrant, while the Middle Eastern Crime Squad arrested the man.


Comment:

Like I've always said; These criminals - drug and weapons runners - aren't bikers, they are Lebos and other muds imported from the Middle East.

@Cailen.

[Footy club Torquay Tigers pulls Ku Klux Klan image]

Footy club Torquay Tigers pulls Ku Klux Klan image

Peter Familari | April 30, 2009

AN offensive image has been pulled from the Torquay Tigers website within half an hour of media reports.

The picture promoting an upcoming club social called "All White Night" showed men clad in full Ku Klux Klan costumes.

"It caught me by surprise, because I haven't been on the website for a while. I didn't know anything about it," said Michael Coleman, Torquay Tigers club secretary.

"But I'm thinking 'All White Night' and hoping no one would find any racism in that. But the picture is likely to be the work of an individual person and it's certainly not the club's thoughts."

The Ku Klux Klan, also known as the KKK, is a white supremacist organisation which has a record of violence towards African-Americans, Jews and other minorities.

The picture was withdrawn soon after it attracted widespread media attention, being replaced by Disney character Snow White.

But the club's social on May 2 is still being promoted as an "All White Night" on the website homepage.

http://www.torquaytigers.com.au
Please note that until further notice the Torquay Tigers web site has been relocated. LMWAO!

[Workers find message in Auschwitz bottle]

Workers find message in Auschwitz bottle

From correspondents in Warsaw - AAP

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25397408-401,00.html

WORKERS demolishing a wall of a building that was once part of the Nazi's Auschwitz-Birkenau death camp have found a message in a bottle written by prisoners 65 years ago.

"We know two of the Auschwitz prisoners who signed the message survived the camp, but their later fate isn't known," Auschwitz-Birkenau museum historian Jerzy Mensfelt said today.

"If they are alive, they would be in their 80s now. Perhaps the publicity surrounding this discovery will lead to more information."

Workers found the bottled message when demolishing a wall at the State Higher Vocational School in the southern Polish town of Oswiecim, the site of the infamous World War II camp.

It had been placed in the mortar of a building which had served as a warehouse for the camp's Nazi guards.

Hand-written in pencil, the note bears the names and camp ID numbers of seven camp prisoners including four Poles and one Frenchman from Lyon.  All were aged 18 to 20.

Further details are expected to be made public in the coming days.

More than one million people, mostly European Jews, perished at the Auschwitz-Birkenau twin death camps during World War II.

http://www.failpix.net
http://www.failpix.net/tag/stupid

[Skinheads:]

"I have said it time and time again: CREATIVITY defies classification into any present categories of racial, political, or religious movements. It is not similar to, or a copy of any other movement, past or present. It is not a re-tread of Hitler's Nazi movement, nor are we "Neo-Nazis." It is not similar to, or affiliated with, any of the Klans. It is not a White Supremacy group." Ben Klassen, September 1983.

What few fail to realise is that Creativity did not begin as a Hitler worshipping skinhead religion, accepting the one that has tattooed the most swastikas onto his body and a (backwards) !AWOHAR on his forehead as the latest leader in the Cult of Personality - but to many, this is what Creativity has become.

And this is where it stops.

I have spoken on this subject many times in the past with Rev. Billy on this subject, and I'm glad to see that Reverends Williams and others are on board with us for this. Many will not agree with us, and indeed, we are not going to agree one-hundred percent with eachother on this matter, however, for the main part, we ARE in agreement.

Creativity is not a skinhead religion. It was not created by skinheads or for any one particular fad, class or nation - Creativity is for ALL White People, no matter where they happen to be, or their choice of hair and clothing. If you are here under the misconception that Creativity bends to the will of the skinhead fad, then you are in the wrong place and may aswell stop reading and leave now.

Now, let's get a few things straight. People will argue forever on what it is to be a skinhead, but we have absolutely no interest in that. All we are interested in are public (mis)conceptions. I.e. Hollywood enforced beliefs of what it means to be a skinhead. Drunk, violent, of limited intelligence and criminally oriented. That is the public perception of a skinhead and to many, that is how they perceive Creativity.

How do we stop this? The answer is simple: First we remove from Creativity those that glorify in that manner of behaviour. Note that I said behaviour. The second and more difficult answer is to change people's perceptions by changing how we appear to them. I.e. Dropping the skinhead fetish many seem to have and convince people to leave their swastikas at home.

Skinheads: Hollywood's response to a dwindling use of the Ku Klux Klan as an effective tool to keep the masses enthralled at the pure evil that Whitey can do, was to turn the skinhead into the bald neo-Nazi hiding under your bed. It might sound laughable, but it was effective. Whether skinheads ever were of any use as White activists is highly speculative. However, if skinheads were of any use, that time has long since passed. Today's skinheads are more often desciples of fashion, music and hard partying than they are dedicated White activists. Where skinheads go, infighting occurs as they attempt to follow the doctrines set out for them by Hollywood script writers and prove that each is harder than the other.

Are you a Skinhead?: The style of your hair means nothing these days. Let's face it, a shaved head is probably more popular with the average person in the street than it is with those who like to call themselves "Skins." Jeans with a collared shirt and heavy boots are traits of the White working class which skinheads co-opted for themselves. Again it is simply a style of clothing that is worn by your average White male of middle to low income around the world. Denim/jean jackets and bomber jackets are also something that has been co-opted by the skinhead fad - and just like shaving your head, if that's what you want to do, we are not going to tell you to hide your scalp under a cap or to remove your bomber jacket. However, if you have gone to the extreme and have carefully decked yourself out in an early 1970's style skinhead outfit, then I'm here to tell you that you will never be permitted to form a Primary Group attached to the Creativity Alliance. Even though you may very well be the opposite of Hollywood's portrayl of skinheads, you will still NOT be permitted to fill any role in the Creativity Alliance because your chosen style of dress does nothing but reaffirm public misconceptions about Creativity.

Those who fit the behaviour of the Hollywood skinheads - no matter how they dress - will be thrown out. Those who are model skinheads who fit the look but not the behaviour, we ask that you do what is good for the White Race and modify your clothing style - roll your jeans down and hide your braces - and then join with us.

Tattoos: Many of us have tattoos, but we don't go poncing about the place trying to show off. If you aren't swimming or doing something that requires removing your shirt, then leave it on. If you feel that you must take your shirt off everytime you are with your brothers, then I suggest you find the local gay bar, buy some ecstacy and dance until you drop dead of dehydration.

Costumes: There is no better way to sum up the myriad styles of getup that people like to get around in. American Civil War toy soldier's hats, stitching arms on a bedsheet pretending they are with the Klan, imitation National Socialist SA and SS uniforms, or all dolled up in camouflage imitating GI Joe; whatever your fancy, leave it at home. What you probably didn't know is that many groups such as the Klan that still wear such uniforms now do so only at private functions. It is as much a matter of public perception for them as it is for us.

Flags: Leave your Confederate and swastika flags nailed to the wall at home. The only flag a Creator needs is the flag of Creativity. If you feel that it is essential to show the public that you are proud of your home region, then bring along your state, national or other regional flag.

Recommended Clothing: This will depend on your financial status and the situation you find yourself in. If you can afford a suit, then get one - get three if possible. Failing that, plain white collared shirts, black pants (or skirts if the ladies so desire) and black shoes. This is not meant to be a uniform, it is just a minimum standard that Creators should aim for. Jeans, joggers/boots, t-shirt/collared shirt are all that is required for many situations. Just make sure that there are no offensive patches or logos on your jacket or shirt.

Overall, dress for effect. Have some pride in your appearance. If you have a beard and/or moustache, keep them trimmed - if you don't, then shave before you go out.  Same with your hair, keep it tidy or shave it off. If you have dredlocks, you're a disgusting piece of excrement whom we do not wish to associate with.

Behaviour: There's nothing wrong with a few cold beers, just try not to allow yourself to get blind drunk. Don't start fights with people just because they disagree with you. Don't knowingly commit crimes and never attempt to convince others to commit criminal offences on your behalf. If you are known to be inclined to bullying, intimidation of others and/or criminal behaviour, you will not be permitted to fill any role in the Creativity Alliance whatsoever. If you were once given a ministerial title - whether it was in Ben Klassen's, Matt Hale's or any other Church or group dedicated to Creativity, that title will be removed from you by a majority vote of the Guardians of the Faith Committee, and you will be declared unfit to call yourself a Creator.

I hope that this sets things straight with people. I know that some who read this will complain that I've insulted this person or alienated that type of supposedly hardcore activist. The reality is that we just don't care. If you feel insulted, then go elsewhere. Creativity has been brought to an almighty low in recent years thanks to those who fit the negative descriptions above claiming they represent Creativity.

I do believe that if we all follow the guidelines set out above and do what is good for the White Race, then we can take Creativity from the lowest it has ever been to heights never before seen - and then together, we CAN win this racial holy war.

Reverend Cailen Cambeul.

[@Cailen.]

Some describe Pauline Hanson as a White Nationalist. White she is, but racial her views are not. In truth, Pauline doesn't have a problem with a multi-racial Australia. Her problem is with a multi-cultural Australia. As far as she's concerned, it doesn't matter what race they are, providing they accept Australian values, tradition and language as their own. In her speeches, she does all but mention the words "melting pot" in her description of what she sees as the future of Australia.

To Australians who are new to this forum, take heed. You don't need to be "racist" to be against multi-culturalism, but you do need to be racist to see through to the taboo subjects of purpose built multi-racialism and the global genocide of White people.

@Cailen.


http://cc.msnscache.com/cache.aspx?q=racist&d=75667298670786&mkt=en-AU&setlang=en-AU&w=7a97e408,4f29480d

Pauline Hanson and the Media

ROSS COULTHART, REPORTER: When an elderly gentleman was bashed by protestors for merely attending a Pauline Hanson rally last year, many Australians who find her policies contemptible nonetheless realised an awful line had been crossed.

Dreadful as it was, the event gave many in the media cause to consider how they had covered these often frightening anti-racism demonstrations. How did our unquestioning coverage of exhortations to kill Pauline Hanson sit with the fact that this was meant to be the voice of anti-racist tolerance?

PAUL SHEEHAN, SYDNEY MORNING HERALD: Last year we saw a frontal assault on freedom of assembly and freedom of speech in Australia. A lot of people were going to One Nation out of curiosity. They'd heard about it in the media and they were curious and what a fearful experience that turned out to be and how did the news media treat this? They treated it with kid gloves. It came and went. They weren't particularly fussed because it was only One Nation that was being physically assaulted and intimidated. That was a disgrace.

REPORTER: As confronting as the admission may be, it is undeniable that many in the mainstream media have unashamedly set out to damage Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party because of its implicitly racist and divisive agenda. But, in seeking to expose what many suspect is the dark side of Hansonism have we crossed an ethical line?I our zeal to do the hatchet job, have we subverted the last few remaining threads of credibility we have with much of the Australian public. And worst of all we are in part responsible for the rise and rise of Pauline Hanson's?

DAVID BARNETT, AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL REVIEW: The media has created Pauline Hanson. Pauline Hanson can't possibly complain about media, about her coverage in the media. It's been relentlessly hostile. She's never been given a fair go.

MARGO KINGSTON, SYDNEY MORNING HERALD: She gets a huge cheer when she says the media is very trying. She gets lots of questions from the floor about why does the media hate you? Why are they against you? Now that'' very cleaver politics of her because when the media attacks her or questions her then the popularity rises.

GRAEME CAMPBELL, AUSTRALIA FIRST PARTY INDEPENDENT FOR KALGOORLIE: When Pauline Hanson came to this Parliament, there was a concerted effort by the media, the political parties, the churches, pressure to destroy her. All they did was generate public sympathy for Pauline.

REPORTER: A year on from last year's violence, if anything, the media pack's hostility to Pauline Hanson and what it believes she represents has hardened. So much so, that at this press conference to launch her immigration policy earlier last week, the hatred in the room borne towards the Independent member for Oxley from many here was palpable.

Hanson had to expect she'd be asked some tough questions about her confronting policies – not least because her new Immigration spokeswoman is Robin Spencer, brought in from the cold extremes of the Australians Against Further Immigration group.

{FILE TAPE ROBIN SPENCER AT PRESS CONF.}: "Excuse me, the ethnic group leaders are one of the problems of this country". {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: Media frustrations boiled over when, time and time again, both women asserted that the official immigration figures were a giant Government lie – designed to keep the 'truth' about real immigration levels from the public.

{FILE TAPE ROBIN SPENCER AT PC}: "The current Government doesn't include many people that come into Australia to settle here permanent, legally or illegally in their figures." {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: Equally frustrating was One Nation's assertion that the Immigration policy would be non-discriminatory. For Spencer particularly made no secret of her desire to protect against what she sees as an undesirable level of ethnic Asian migration.

{FILE TAPE – SPENCER AT PC}: "Now when Dr Charles Price from here in Canberra did his study he showed that Australia really would be 27 per cent Asians in 23 years. {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: The demographer quoted, a Dr Price, later said One Nation had distorted and misrepresented his research. But the image going out that night to the national audience was that of Pauline Hanson being yelled at yet again by a baying media pack.

DAVID OLDFIELD, ADVISOR ONE NATION: The whole thing was attack, attack, attack. There was nothing genuine about it. It was a whole bunch of people with an agenda. Not a group of professional journalists asking questions.

REPORTER: When you were standing to one side looking on you almost had a smile on your face was the thought going through your mind that all this is doing is playing to Pauline Hanson's natural constituency?

OLDFIELD: Oh to a degree. But mostly what I was thinking was that I thought the public would enjoy seeing journalists the way they think journalists are. And journalists were not letting the public down.

REPORTER: Later that evening One Nation was allowed to win yet another propaganda coup when Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock backed down on an earlier promise to debate Hanson's immigration policy on A Current Affair, objecting to Spencer's presence.

{FILE TAPE RAY MARTIN, ACA}: "Seems a strange decision considering John Howard's recent statement that One Nation's policies should be subjected to close scrutiny and challenge." {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: Once again the distorted references to Charles Price were employed.

{FILE TAPE SPENCER EX ACA: "Charles Price, a respected demographer said...{END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: And appeals to official fact, this time from two immigration experts were swept away by the frustrating One Nation semantic blend of conspiracies, emotion and selective statistics. The more the experts looked smug in the knowledge that they were right, the more David Oldfield looking on knew his leader had won the point.

Robin Spencer clearly upset, but Pauline Hanson knew her message had hit the mark with her A Current Affair audience.

John Pasquarelli was Pauline Hanson's advisor until a falling out last year. He accuses the media of trying to destroy Hanson not just because of what she says but because we and the political establishment are elitist snobs who hate the sort of person that she is.

JOHN PASQUARELLI, FORMER ADVISOR PAULINE HANSON: I think a lot of these people just are up themselves. A lot of them are, I think they're snobs in a lot of ways. They think they're intellectual snobs. They're elite. And how dare a person like Pauline Hanson come along who drops the odd 'R', and god help us work in a fish and chip shop. I mean the greatest example of new age snobbery was that exhibited by Janet Holmes A 'Court when she made a sneering reference to that fish and chip shop woman from Queensland. I mean that again just sent Hanson's appeal up again.

REPORTER: Of course, it's precisely Pauline Hanson's common touch that helped her win 11 seats in last month's Qld State Election. Who could imagine Bronwyn Bishop, Cheryl Kernot or Carmen Lawrence agreeing to do this?

Do you think that it's a class thing with Pauline Hanson?

OLDFIELD: I believe that it is. Yes. I think that the media definitely see themselves as elitist. They definitely see themselves as some sort of social conscience that must make sure that the Australian people see it the way the media see it.

REPORTER: Margo Kingston is one of the Sydney Morning Herald's senior political reporters. She admits that initially she and many of her colleagues made a mistake by deliberately not reporting on Hanson in the hope Hanson and her supporters would go away.

KINGSTON: When the news poll hit two weeks into the Qld election we knew we had to work out what was going on here, that we'd made a mistake. And I think the mistake we made, certainly the mistake I made is I think we all believed Australia had settled a few things about our identity, about our tolerance and about our place in Asia and in the World. And personally I just got the shock of my life and went out to Qld to follow her around and realised you try and have a conversation with the country person about race and there is simply not the language to communicate. Is so different, it is just down the line.

REPORTER: In the weeks prior to the Qld poll it was soon clear that Hanson was not a flash in the pan but looking at a major victory for One Nation. But when Kingston started writing about just what an effective politician Hanson was, many of her colleagues accused her of going soft on the One Nation leader.

KINGSTON: What I was actually doing, shock horror, was observational reportage. That's all.

REPORTER: As distinct from?

KINGSTON: As distinct from finding the chink and making that the story. For example the Courier Mail followed her once in the last week of the campaign. They tried to ignore her. They followed her up to North Qld where every single small town came out to meet her. It was mob scenes. It was interesting. Weird, mind blowing phenomenon. The Courier Mail ran four paras about how she nearly got killed on the road when a driver tried to overtake her that was it.

REPORTER: One obvious example of the media's calculated bias against Hanson was the photos of her used during the campaign.

KINGSTON: If you look at all the mainstream media's pictures of Pauline Hanson before the Qld election and they're all thin lips, sour glowering. Every single one of them. After the Election, all of a sudden, the smiles the attractive face of Pauline Hanson. Now it's easiest to find it in the image but in the stories of course it's happening as well.

REPORTER: So why were the media elite doing that. Why do we do that?

KINGSTON: Well I think it's because there's a social which is evil, destructive and ultimately dangerous for our economy as well. The race stuff is intolerable. Now what the mainstream media wanted, I think what all the mainstream Australia wanted was for the race stuff to be knocked off early. It wasn't John Howard refused to do it. In fact he opened the door to it. He said he understood. Now in may view and I think the view many people – I don't know, I don't think I am elite! – many people who think about Australia for a living: race is not something that you allow to flower.

REPORTER: When John Howard raised his own concerns about the rate of Asian immigration in 1988, many in the media shouted him down as a 'racist'. Noted Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey also copped the same epithet for his views. Whether the media's efforts to knock that race debate on the head was right or wrong, there are those who argue its suppression spawned the seeds of Hansonism a decade on.

PASQUARELLI: Pauline Hanson I think thinks that she is the message but she's only just another messenger. There's a lot of people that have gone before her: John Stone, Blainey, Ruxton, Peter Walsh and of course Graeme Campbell and Pauline never created this response to her. It has been there all the time. I say it's been there festering away since Whitlam and it's been bubbling and seething away right up until her maiden speech. And then it all started coming out. Now that's the response. She let the genie out of the bottle.

REPORTER: As you'll see in Part Two of our story, there's good reason to suspect that the media's efforts to stifle the flames of racism has unwittingly boosted the Hanson bandwagon's ascent to Canberra.

PART TWO:

{FILE TAPE} HANSON MAIDEN SPEECH: My view on issues is based on commonsense and my experience as a mother of 4 children, as a sole parent and a businesswoman running a fish and chip shop. {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: The media should have studied recent history more closely for early on in Hanson's political career when she rose to make her maiden speech to parliament we also tried to ignore her without success.

{FILE TAPE-MAIDEN SPEECH}: I am fed up to the back teeth with the inequalities that are being promoted by the Government and paid for by the taxpayer under the assumption that aboriginals are the most disadvantaged people in Australia. {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: While her speech received very limited coverage on mainstream radio and the next day's papers, one grab in particular seized the imagination of thousands of callers to tabloid talkback radio that evening and the next day.

{FILE TAPE SPEECH: I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians. {END FILE TAPE}

PASQUARELLI: The fax machine went burr and just melted down when the Parliamentary switchboard here they were getting back up forces, back up help, to come in when the switchboard here at Parliament House went into melt-down.

REPORTER: Fired by the shockjocks, so began the media transformation of the Qld country girl into a major new political force – Hanson receiving credibility in a growing avalanche of press coverage. While there was no doubting the implicitly racist overtones in her speech, we in the media unwittingly played right into One Nation's hands by giving her often wildly inaccurate assertions national prominence.

The biggest shock to media and hardened political operators from the major parties was the enthusiasm with which the Midday audience applauded her taboo claims: that aborigines get unfair benefits; her call for the abolition of multiculturalism; and her fears about the level of Asian immigration.

{FILE TAPE HANSON ON MIDDAY 11 SEPTEMBER 1996}: If they leave their country, come out here then they are Australians. Everyone equal, everyone treated the same and no one's better than anyone else. Audience Applause. {END FILE TAPE}

OLDFIELD: What Pauline has done is broken through that veil of political correctness that has suppressed people. I mean there are millions of decent Australians out there who have not a racist bone in their body but they're sick to death of being told what they're allowed to say and what they're not allowed to say.

REPORTER: Sydney Morning Herald senior journalist Paul Sheehan has written what is this week a number 1 best selling book called 'Among the Barbarians', arguing that there are taboo concerns, including those about aborigines and Asian immigration, that we in the media have colluded to suppress.

PAUL SHEEHAN, SYDNEY MORNING HERALD: The news media gave her an enormous amount of publicity. They gave her the oxygen and then they sneered and jeered and ridiculed her and ordinary people were saying, wait a minute, wait a minute, she's raising issues that we would like raised and she's getting bucketed and they felt that by being bucketed that they themselves were being bucketed by this cappuccino ghetto, these little cappuccino quaffing journalists who were sneering at the working class Australians.

REPORTER: Sheehan actually argues the media chose to hear what it wanted to hear in Hanson's speech because it was convinced she was really a racist.

SHEEHAN: The speech contained the ultimate sound bite, 'we're going to be swamped by Asian's', but later in the speech she said she described Asian immigrants as hard-working, and that they should be treated like any other Australian. You could argue that her speech was a speech against racial politics. Now this was never reported in the media and I don't want my remarks to be seen as sympathetic to Pauline Hanson, I'm not. But I am not sympathetic to the way in which the whole issue was distorted. All the comments that she made that would have evened out her remarks have been ignored systematically and cynically.

RICHARD MCGREGOR, THE AUSTRALIAN: One point I agree with Paul Sheehan and other people is that the accusation, the shrill accusation of racist is far too overused and used to intimidate people and that's quite correct.

REPORTER: Richard McGregor is the Chief Political Reporter for the Australian newspaper. While he agrees that the use of the 'racist' pejorative in Australia has often demeaned the real meaning of the word, he echoes the view of most of his press gallery colleagues that Hanson's speeches are racist and should be treated as such by the media.

MCGREGOR: But if you, say for example, raise the issue of slowing down Asian immigration, what does that mean? Does that mean we then discriminate on the grounds of race and letting people into the country? Do we give points for Hong Kong and more points for Britain and less for Lebanon. I mean, how does it work. How do you do it?

REPORTER: If Hanson's maiden speech was racist, her appearance on the Midday program a week later with Aboriginal leader Charlie Perkins tellingly revealed most in the audience didn't care. Hanson was telling them what they'd wanted to hear for years.

{FILE TAPE HANSON ON MIDDAY 16 SEPTEMBER 1996}:
Hanson: I feel that his has been just suppressed for too long in this country. It's about time we brought it out in the open. It's like a festering sore. People need to talk about it. APPLAUSE.
Charles Perkins: You're an ignorant person in terms of race relations in this country. You don't know what your talking about (noise from audience). Just a minute. The blue rinse set is piping in.
Kennerley: Excuse me Mr Perkins I wouldn't like you to insult our audience who have been gracious enough to give you your time this afternoon.
Perkins: You've been wonderful to do that.
Kennerley: So if you wouldn't mind not being rude to our audience...
Perkins: I'm not being rude, don't be rude to me if you could just let me finish then, I know it's your program.
Kennerley: do not be rude to our audience.
{END FILE TAPE}

PASQUARELLI: She did him like a dinner. I mean Charles Perkins, the Aboriginal industry should never ever let him be their spokesman.

{FILE TAPE HANSON ON MIDDAY 16 SEPT 1996}: You have the position. You're on the ATSIC board. Well what have you done for your people. [Audience applause] Where has the money gone? I am concerned about your people and you know what, I want to see what's happening to the money. Why isn't it going to where it's supposed to be going? [Applause] {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: On live national television Hanson clumsily articulated the frustrations of many people – including aborigines - with the wastage and failures in Aboriginal funding. And when she presented Perkins with what she claimed was her report on these problems he angrily threw it back.

{FILE TAPE PERKINS AND HANSON ON MIDDAY}: She's telling a lot of bullshit. She doesn't' know what she's talking about. She's using Parliament to slam Asians, Aboriginal people and all good Australians. You're giving Australians a bad name lady, a bad name. { END FILE TAPE }

PETER BOWERS: I am at once fascinated and absolutely repulsed by this woman.

REPORTER: Peter Bowers is one of Canberra's most respected and experienced political journalists. He agrees that a mainstream media reluctance to acknowledge the failures and weaknesses in some aboriginal programs has handed Hansonism the most effective form of propaganda:

BOWERS: All the buttons she touches, there are elements of truth there. There are elements of truth in the Question she asked the PM yesterday about aborigines getting loans for one and a half percent. Why can't you give it to hard pressed country folk for one and a half per cent when I set up a people's bank I get ridiculed... So there is an element of truth, that's true.

REPORTER: And is it true that the country feels that that aspect of the debate has been suppressed by people like you and I.

BOWERS: I think unwittingly there's a lot of us in the media may have been shied off these things because of political correctness but we didn't want to see if we questioned some programs as to why it is that aboriginal health is such an appalling disgraceful national scandal despite a great deal of public money that's been thrown at the problem.

REPORTER: Have we done a disservice by not reporting the corruption. We've all seen it?

KINGSTON: I don't think there's any doubt about that. The apex of this movement in the early 90s was Robert Tickner, the Aboriginal Affairs Minister, walking into a room saying I have just done a report on the $250m aboriginal health strategy, we can't find out where the money's gone, it's made no difference. And someone, I think it was me, said 'Excuse me this isn't good enough' and I got accused of 'I know you're not a racist Margo but some people would think you were.' There is no doubt that at that stage the issues were so sensitive that we went too far one way.

REPORTER: We suppressed that debate?

KINGSTON: It was suppressed.

REPORTER: The real danger posed in the rise in Pauline Hanson and her One Nation supporters is that the more the media and our politicians attempt to suppress the grievances of her audience - however ignorant and racist they are - the more ready that audience will to wear the racist tag.

PASQUARELLI: As soon as you ever try to have a debate, you're called a racist. Seriously, you are called a racist. Read through the articles written in the Age or the Fairfax press. Your called a racist or a bigot. Thank God those words have been so misused by your mates in the media. They've lost their currency. Just like homosexuals stole gay. Now we're going to see principle and morality. The way these politicians are flogging those words another couple of years they'll have no currency either.

REPORTER: There's another word that people now associate with Pauline Hanson and it's spawned the phrase that has become her rallying cry.

{FILE TAPE EX: 60 MINUTES 13 OCTOBER 1996}: Tracey Curro: Are you Xenophobic?
Hanson: Please explain? {END FILE TAPE}

PASQUARELLI: Immediately she said it I prayed. The first time in my life I've prayed I think. Ad I said please don't let them edit that out, and they didn't.

REPORTER: But they presumably.....

PASQUARELLI: But they thought it was going to do Pauline a lot of damage I think. And it backfired.

REPORTER: It's a measure of just how much of a gulf there is between the sneering media and it's understanding of Hanson's appeal that what we all thought was an embarrassing blunder became Pauline Hanson's credo cur.

Another confronting thing for all of us in the media is that a lot of support for Hanson's implicitly racist calls to reduce Asian immigration and abolish multiculturalism actually comes from ethnic Australia.

Everywhere she goes, Hanson's audience responds sympathetically to her claims that she is not getting a fair go from the media.

OLDFIELD: People hate, absolutely hate the media with a vengeance.

REPORTER: Pauline Hanson's advisor David Oldfield admits One Nation has no difficulties in convincing the public that media coverage of the Party and its leader has been hysterically biased.

Why he says is the media so eager to dig up sexual dirt on him and Hanson and not to raise the stories we all know about other politicians?

OLDFIELD: There are no taboos. Anything can be asked, any line can be crossed, as soon as it's Pauline Hanson the media think they've got a free kick to hurt, to impale, to attack, to murder to do anything they like. Any scurrilous allegation regardless of how lacking in substance, regardless of how lacking in credibility the person who might be making it may be, gets a run. If your willing to put up your hand and say I've got something really nasty to say about Pauline Hanson you'll find yourself on national television.

{FILE TAPE: SUNDAY 13 JUNE 1998}:"BRIAN ANNEAR WALKER"
Ransley: Do you know how many school teachers there are?
Walker: No I'll be honest about that.
Ransley: What about the annual budget of the Queensland education department.? Walker: No I don't know. {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: Prior to the June 13th Queensland state elections with polls showing One Nation almost certain to hold the balance of power. Sunday's Paul Ransley quizzed some of the parties candidates about the portfolios they would be expected to oversee.

{FILE TAPE ROSITTA PETCH HEALTH SPOKESWOMAN}:
Ransley: Do you know what the Queensland share of the Medicare agreement is.?
Petch: No I'm not going to start quoting numbers because I could quote the wrong number.
Ransley: Do you know how many Aborigines and Torres Strait islanders make up the prison population in Queensland?
no.
Petch: I should know these things but I'm just telling you I'm not going to quote numbers. I may quote the wrong number and that will leave me with egg on my face and I don't intend to do that. {END FILE TAPE}

OLDFIELD: There's no doubt they were caught out and they looked very silly. And in fact I use the tape from your show now to train other people as to how not to get themselves caught. But I mean what you get of course is, your people would have known these people were very inexperienced, you can lead them up the garden path. I mean the bottom line is, and I think the public are aware of this, an experienced journalist can get a person to say things that they just don't mean.

REPORTER: This week Pauline Hanson ejected the Queensland Times newspaper from her electorate office. Claiming it was biased. The offending story run about a One Nation candidate prior to the qld poll seemed reasonable enough. But it was a perfect opportunity for Hanson to give the media a serve. As hard as it may be for us in the media to admit it Pauline Hanson does have a point. Like the way the press covered allegations by liberal MP Tony Abbot a week ago.

{FILE TAPE ABBOTT IN PARLIAMENT}: So One Nation has registered in Queensland it doesn't have 500 members, it is not a validly registered political party and it cannot receive any public funding. {END FILE TAPE}

REPORTER: neither Tony Abbot nor most of the national media that carried his allegations last weekend bothered to check them first with the qld electoral commission. Readers of this Sun Herald headline could be forgiven for thinking that Hanson would pocket half a million dollars in funding for her own personal use. Yet this week a frustrated Queensland electoral commissioner Mr Des O'Shea told Sunday that Tony Abbots' allegations about the parties registration were completely baseless. Also this week the Australia Israel review magazine allowed one nation to once again take the moral high ground by publishing the names of 2000 party members and donors from a leaked confidential list.

OLDFILED: Considering the history of the Jewish people for one of their magazines to open to persecution 1000 or so of our members by printing their names I think is just the peak of hypocrisy. I mean they are Nazi style tactics to be quite frank.

REPORTER: Indeed other Jewish groups and civil liberty organisations backed away from the ill conceived attack. Horrified at the breach of privacy of people who after all were merely exercising their right to belong to a political party. While the publishers tried to defend their actions they had in fact unwittingly delivered one nation another propaganda victory. In the wake of One Nation's Queensland victory, the media and the mainstream parties have often sought to either ignore, ridicule or sully Pauline Hanson. An unconvinced constituency has pushed her support even higher in the polls.

PASQUARRELLI: She and the media know are locked together. You know it's locked in an embrassive you know, both parties don't want to be in but they're there.

REPORTER: The frustrating dilemma for the media is how to analyse the policies of a party that when it's confronted with an objective truth claims its all part of a big Government lie. Perhaps we should be looking at why so many people want to believe that. To borrow from Friedrich Nietzsche "the more the media tries to destroy Pauline Hanson the more it will make her strong".

ENDS.

[Internet NewsAustralian Government adds Wikileaks to banned website listLinking to flagged sites will cost you]

http://www.techradar.com/news/internet/australia-issues-wikileaks-linking-fine-warning-585894

Internet News
Australian Government adds Wikileaks to banned website list
Linking to flagged sites will cost you

The Australian communications regulator has issued a stark warning that websites who link out to 'banned' hyperlinks are liable to fines of up to Aus $11,000 a day.

The news comes after web forum Whirlpool was threatened with the fine for posting a hyperlink to a blacklisted anti-abortion website.

Wikileaks blacklisted

One of the newest additions to Australia's 'blacklisted hyperlinks' list is Wikileaks; the website that publishes anonymous submissions of sensitive info on everything from corporations, religion and governments.

The blacklisting of certain pages of the site has come about after Wikileaks posted a list of websites at the tail end of 2008 that comprised the 'secret internet censorship' list for Denmark. On this list were over 3,500 sites that were censored or banned in the country.

Disturbing picture

While Australia's list of blacklisted sites currently stands at 1,370, the Sydney Morning Herald is reporting that that list could increase to around 10,000 sites – most of which are of illegal pornographic content, but could also includes sites that house incendiary political discussions.

"The Government is embarking on a deeply unpopular and troubling experiment to fine-tune its ability to censor the internet," said communications spokesman Senator Scott Ludlam of Australian opposition party Greens.

"If you consider this kind of net censorship in the context of Australia's anti-terror laws, it paints a disturbing picture indeed."

On its website, Wikileaks, which leaked the news that the government had banned it for leaking information, simply said: "The first rule of censorship is that you cannot talk about censorship."

Currently, it is not illegal for internet users in Australia to click on the sites found on the web blacklist. The people targeted by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) are webmasters linking out to the sites that the government have flagged up as inappropriate.

This could all change, however, if a mandatory internet filtering censorship scheme is implemented – something that is being debated at the moment.

Via Sydney Morning Herald
By Marc Chacksfield

Can anyone else see http://wikileaks.org ? I'm in Australia and I can't.
Either the site is down because of too much traffic, or I'm blocked by the Oz JOG.

@Cailen.

[From:]

From: http://www.911missinglinks.com

As mastermind/creator of this site and the film "Missing Links", I, Mike Delaney of http://prothink.org, want everyone to STEAL this movie and call it your own and get it out to everyone you know. This video was the sacrifice of people like myself who wanted the REAL truth about 9/11 to get out.

Thank you
Mike Delaney

Save and then Watch:

http://911missinglinks.com/911_Missing_Links_FULL_Length.mp4

http://911missinglinks.com

From the Source: Now you will discover the definitive truth about 9/11 and learn why even the most popular movies on the subject have failed to address the evidence exhaustively presented in this video. The facts will make it abundantly clear that the so-called 9/11 "Truth" movement has been infiltrated and is ultimately controlled by the same criminal group who masterminded the attacks. As they say, 'if you want to control the dissent you lead the dissent.' Utilizing evidence from the FBI, CIA, NSA, US Armed Forces Intelligence sectors, Foreign Intelligence organizations, local law enforcement agencies and independent investigators, Missing Links goes where no other 9/11 video has dared to.

[Encyclopedia of white power]

Encyclopedia of white power By Jeffrey Kaplan
http://books.google.com/books?id=nNWbbhUYv8oC&printsec=frontcover&dq=Encyclopedia+of+white+power

The white separatist movement in the United States By Betty A. Dobratz, Stephanie L. Shanks-Meile
http://books.google.com/books?id=r59bGyH4lOAC&printsec=frontcover&dq=white-separatist-movement-in-the-united-states

Inside Organized Racism - Women in the Hate Movement By Kathleen M. Blee
http://books.google.com/books?id=O8rj6BaBIecC&printsec=frontcover&dq=white-separatist-movement-in-the-united-states&vq=%22%22White+power,+white+pride!%22%22&source=gbs_book_citations_r&cad=1_1


Google Search ...
http://books.google.com/books?q=church-of-the-creator&btnG=Search+Books

[Your video to share:]

Your video to share:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dIkf0k747c

You'll see a White bloke getting kicked repeatedly in the head by a group of Sudanese and a couple of Asians going past which are left untouched,  who of course don't bother to help.

GRAPHIC footage of a youth's brutal bashing at a train station shows three attackers taking turns to kick him in the head.

Detectives investigating the vicious assault say they are appalled by the level of violence, which left the 23-year-old man from Sunshine in Melbourne's west with serious head injuries.

The man was beaten even after he handed over the backpack that appeared to be the motive behind the gang-attack.

Transit detective Mark Sontag said he believed even the trio's mates and family would not hesitate to turn them in, given the nature of the assault, the Herald Sun reports.

The disturbing footage shows the slightly-built youth's head bouncing on the concrete walls of the underpass as he is kicked time and time again by three men of African appearance, even after slumping to the ground unconscious.

Afterwards, one of the attackers appears to clap his hands in what appears to be a celebration of the sickening assault.

"Even the perpetrators families' would be disgusted by this," he said.

Police said there was nothing of real value in the victim's bag.

According to the police the unemployed Sunshine man was kicked unconscious and left for dead in the Sunshine Railway Station underpass at 12.10am on Tuesday morning.

The victim initially tried to ignore the three attackers as they tried to engage him in conversation on the train and the platform, before surrounding him and knocking him to the ground.

"This is a pretty appalling attack on a vulnerable young man who was by himself at the Sunshine railway station," Sen-Constable Sontag said.

I've had similar happen to me, but from behind and in Brisbane. When I woke up, the police threatened me with charges of Racial Vilification IF I reported it.

Welcome to multicultural Australia. 

@Cailen.

[UPDATE 1:01am: THE death toll in Australia's worst ever bushfires has hit 93.]

There's been another bushfire in Australia with more than 88 deaths.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25025493-661,00.html

UPDATE 1:01am: THE death toll in Australia's worst ever bushfires has hit 93.

At least 650 homes have been destroyed and 3733 people have registered with the Red Cross after evacuating their properties.

The number left homeless is expected to be far higher, the Red Cross says.

Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon said the death toll included at least four children.

"The sad part for me is to say to the community that there will be more deaths, we believe," Ms Nixon said at a 6pm press conference at Moe Police Station.

"We will find more bodies as we gain access to different parts of the fire areas, where at the moment we just havn't been able to get in.

"So far we have found people in cars, it looks like they have decided late to leave their premises.

"We have found people who have been in properties, in their paddocks.

"We've found others in their houses.

"It covers the whole range. And the sad part is that we found children. That is devastating for us."

Ms Nixon said she was sickened by the fact some of the fires may have been deliberately lit. [more ...]

AUSTRALIA has been singled out as a target for "forest jihad" by a group of Islamic extremists urging Muslims to deliberately light bushfires as a weapon of terror.

Image stored locally
Image from the Herald Sun that is likely to have had Jewish groups frothing at the mouth and led to the removal of articles relating Australia's very real and deadliest bushfire to the Jews' fabled Holocaust.

Video interview: http://player.video.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/#DXQAr4peZS_0GDC7kUtWznRfElRP_gkf

[Q:]

They have a joke in South Africa that goes like this,

Q: What is the difference between a tourist and a racist?
A: About 3 months!!

@Cailen.

[Anti-Racist Activist Mugged By Black Man]

Anti-Racist Activist Mugged By Black Man

http://www.therightperspective.org/?p=1226

A white professor and anti-racist activist has been savagely beaten by an African-American man on the streets of Washington, DC just days before the inauguration of Barack Obama.

62-year old JoAnne Silver Jones was mugged on Jan. 16 while on her way to see her adopted daughter. Jones was beat on her head, arms and hands with a brick by her African-American male assailant during the attack, according to long-time friend Patricia Romney. "He beat her face so badly that she was unable to open her eyes, and one eye socket was torn by the blows," she said.

Jones is an associate professor in the School of Human Services at Springfield College and director of the social work program. She has co-authored a paper titled, "Feminist Strategies for Teaching About Oppression" and was involved with "cross-cultural issues" including a 1999 incident at Amherst Regional High School where Puerto Rican students protested the school's production of "West Side Story".

Jones is still recovering at George Washington University Hospital after undergoing surgery on her skull and eye, but may be released this weekend, Romney said. "She can walk a little but is nauseous and headachy," she said. "She's a tough cookie, but this is totally traumatizing. It's going to be a long way back." Jones will need additional surgery on both hands, which are still bandaged from her elbows to her fingertips.

Romney said she is struck by what she termed the "paradox of it all"  - a white anti-racism activist, the first African-American president and a mugger identified as African-American. To test Jones' brain, doctors asked her the name of the new president, and she answered correctly. "This won't shake any of her political activism," Romney said of Jones. "She's clear about what the issues are. This won't sway her desire to keep fighting for social justice."

Jones' spouse Deborah King will be nursing her back to health. Jones' assailant remains at large.

[Forgotten terror threats—American racists and neo-NazisIdaho Mountain Express]

Forgotten terror threats—American racists and neo-Nazis

Idaho Mountain Express

http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005124570

America's "war on terror" has understandably fixed attention overseas on Muslim militant organizations such as al-Qaeda. But not to be underestimated are the hatred for and potential violence to Americans by homegrown terrorists.

This violent breed of all-white racists reserves their hatred for blacks, Jews and immigrants, usually Hispanics.

Hundreds of small cells of would-be terrorists exist throughout the United States. They travel under various names—Ku Klux Klan, National Socialist Movement, Vinlander Social Club, American National Socialist Workers Party, World Wide Church of the Creator, National Alliance, White Aryan Resistance, National Vanguard.

To the dismay of civil rights groups, on the margins are a few politicians and rural law enforcement officers who express their disdain and distrust of black Americans and Hispanics, plus radio talk show hosts who tend to give stature to racist propaganda.

Several plots to kill Barack Obama were broken up when federal agents arrested the conspirators. A white supremacist neo-Nazi, William White, was arrested after threatening a bank employee, a university professor, a black mayor and African American plaintiffs in a housing bias lawsuit. All the suspects remain in jail.

A number of arrests have also been made in hate crime attacks on Hispanics, including several murders.

The most effective tactic in defusing these groups has been mounted by the Southern Poverty Law Center, of Montgomery, Ala., whose longtime leader, Morris Dees, has been the target of assassination threats. The SPLC has filed 25 successful lawsuits that have crippled or brought down hate groups with civil damage verdicts on behalf of victims or their families. The suits wiped out finances and property assets of the organizations.

Unfortunately, tough economic times seem to be the natural ally of hate groups. Memberships swell with new recruits who blame their troubles on minority groups. For example, the SPLC reports that known anti-immigrant hate groups have increased from 602 in 2000 to 888 in 2008—a 48 percent increase. This prompted Jeff Schoep, leader of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Movement, to crow, "This immigrant thing ... has been the greatest boon to us."

Fueling more hate group activities are the election of the first black U.S. president and a new U.S. Census report predicting America's whites will lose their majority status by 2040.

SPLC spokesman Mark Potok fears the worst—possibly "a dangerous, racially motivated backlash of hate" by American terrorists aimed at other Americans.

Sadly, America's new era of racial diversity could be threatened by a few Americans who live in the dark cultural past.

[Rabbis may halt Vatican talks over Holocaust-denying priest]

Rabbis may halt Vatican talks over Holocaust-denying priest

Riazat Butt, religious affairs correspondent
The Guardian, Thursday 29 January 2009

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/29/rabbis-vatican-pope-holocaust

The Chief Rabbinate of Israel has threatened to break off normal dialogue with the Vatican over its decision to lift the excommunication of a Catholic priest who claimed that no Jews died in gas chambers during the second world war.

In a letter to Cardinal Walter Kasper, president of the Holy See's Commission for Religious Relations with Jewry, officials from Israel's supreme religious governing body warned that without a public apology from the priest it would be "very difficult to continue dialogue with the Vatican as before". The letter called on the priest, British-born Richard Williamson, to recant his "deplorable" statement.

The letter said: "You will appreciate that under such circumstances it would be wiser for us to postpone our next meeting in Rome at the beginning of March until this matter is clarified."

It is the fiercest criticism yet of the papal decree, issued last weekend, aimed at rehabilitating members of a traditionalist Catholic order - the Society of St Pius X - one of whose clerics is a Holocaust denier.

Williamson, who now lives in Argentina, had claimed in a television interview that historical evidence was "hugely against six million having been deliberately gassed in gas chambers as a deliberate policy of Adolf Hitler ... I believe there were no gas chambers."

Alongside three bishops, Williamson was excommunicated 20 years ago after being consecrated by French archbishop Marcel Lefebvre without papal consent.

The letter, signed by Oded Weiner, the director of the Chief Rabbinate, said: "Even if the move in itself was not intended in any way to relate to the church's relationship with the Jewish people, when it involves the embrace of someone who publicly expresses such odious and outrageous opinions, then it definitely does affect our relationship."

Yesterday Weiner told the Guardian the Rabbinate was demanding an explanation from the Vatican. "This relationship is very important for us and the Holy See. We have not cut ties with them. We are saying the matter has to be clarified. They are aware of the pain and sensitivity and they will consider it and send it up to the highest authorities."

His comments came as the pope made his first public remarks on interfaith relations. Referring to his recent commemoration of the Holocaust, he highlighted how at Auschwitz "millions of Jews were cruelly massacred, innocent victims of blind racial and religious hatred". At his weekly audience, yesterday Benedict XVI told thousands: "I once again affectionately express my full and indisputable solidarity with our brothers and sisters who received the first covenant. I trust that the memory of the Shoah will induce humankind to reflect upon the unpredictable power of evil when it conquers the heart of man."

The row, however, shows no immediate sign of abating. The Nobel peace prize winner and death camp survivor, Elie Wiesel, said that the pope, by lifting the excommunications, had given credence to "the most vulgar aspect of antisemitism".

In an interview with Reuters, Wiesel said: "What does the pope think we feel when he did that?"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/judaism

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/race

Just doing my job and bringing it to the fore.


Australia Day is a White only celebration as the Abos consider it Invasion Day.

[@Cailen.]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-ouIc_DDEQ

The band is Rose Tattoo

@Cailen.

[Pontifex Cambeul.]

There's not much else I can say. The title says all there is to it. This is a nigger site to disgust all decent White folk.

"That these filthy creatures who call themselves humans that are white could and do think they are above the universal laws of nature, God and karma bespeaks the psychological sickness that is now inherent in them because of their unwillingness to change,"

http://underprivilegedjournalism.blogspot.com

Pontifex Cambeul.

[@Cailen.]

I have decided to do a new calendar for January 36 AC to December 36 AC (2009) and need your help with the pictures. If you have any images you would like put in this year's Creativity calendar, send them to Admin@creativityalliance.com.

When completed, calendars will be available for purchase online at 0% profit - but that doesn't stop you buying a hundred to distribute and/or sell and make a profit for your own Primary Group.

@Cailen.

First Lady of the United States, Mrs Michelle Obama, likes to keep busy, so she gets a job as a teacher.


Mrs Obama notices a little Black boy in the field standing alone, while all the White kids are running around having fun. She takes pity on him and decides to speak to him.

'You ok?' she says.

'Yes,' he says.

'You don't have to be scared of racism. You can go and play with the other kids you know,' she says.

'It's best I stay here.'he says. '

'Why?' says Mrs Obama.

'Because, I'm the goalie,' replies the boy.

[@Cailen.]

Being in Australia I use http://www.vistaprint.com.au but the company has sites all over the world in a number of languages. Just click the link, sign up and get them to start sending you daily offers in your email. Don't buy anything unless it is on sale and you will soon have your own professional business cards and stationary.

@Cailen.