Main Menu
• Shortened Link: W23.link » CreativityAlliance.com
• Beat the Censors on Social Media with ᵂ23 ᴰᴼᵀ ᴸᴵᴺᴷ
• Free @Rev.JoelDufresne P.O.W. USA - Prison Martyr - Bogus Charges
• Free @JamesCostello P.O.W. UK - 5 Years for Anti-Immigration Stickers
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - RaspStarb

#66
Excellent work Br. Smith.

Since the term "White Supremacist" was automatically invoked by the jews media, this should hit the front page of every  "news site" in OZ, especially those of Rupert "the Rat" Murdoch.

This will have great recruitment value for the Creativity Alliance--Bravo!

   

#67
Books / The Battle for Immortality
Mon 29 Mar 2010
The Battle for Immortality
by Rev. Kenneth Molyneaux

The Battle for Immortality

    Many intrepid adventurers have sought after the medallion of immortality. Have any found this fountain of youth? Are we aware of any heroic souls who have achieved this goal, or is it simply a fairy tale conceived in the mind of a creative minstrel? It is our duty to examine this escapade in order to realize whether or not it is possible to wear the armor of everlasting life. After all, who would not gallop swiftly after this sparkling diamond if they beheld it half-buried in the sand?

    Even in this age of scientific might, there is no way to sustain physical immortality. The body is doomed to die, regardless of how much we might wish to change this. Sure, there have been those who have eclipsed the century mark in years, but they too eventually saw the end of the story called life. Despite the continual torrent of money that we pour into medical research, we are no closer to eternal life than we were thousands of years ago when we were born. Is it therefore a fruitless endeavor to strive for immortality? The body surely perishes, but is there some other way to achieve our goal?

    In spite of our corporeal husk, we can live on in the minds of others after our descent into death. By great and noble deeds, we can engrave our names so indelibly into the hearts of the people, that it will be impossible to forget our ascendant names. By contributing zealously to our crusade, we will not only find contentment in our actions, but, if our actions are great enough, we will be forever remembered by our progeny. This dedication can take many forms, like spreading our sublime message to the masses, or financially supporting the cause, or writing epic masterpieces to rouse our mighty folk, or many other productive means. The spirit of Klassen and Hitler will never fade from our minds and they prove that immortality exists. While they may not walk amongst us, there essence will only perish if our race expires.

    While we all struggle in our sacred path and would appreciate being recognized for our accomplishments, we must realize that there is a higher form of immortality than that of the individual. Surely those valiant heroes who blaze a path of righteousness must be honored, but without those who become immortal by carrying on our golden race in the form of families, we would be utterly and totally obliterated. Only by having large, salubrious families can we repopulate this world with our aristocratic kind. Therefore, the propagation of our folk is of supreme importance to ensuring the immortality of our people.

    Our trek through the dimensions of unending life have shown that through mighty deed and procreation, we can indeed sustain life past our worldly demise. We needn't choose between the two, however. We must embrace both options with utter merriment similar to how we wield our hefty battle-axes in our Racial Holy War. Our axes should be double- bladed to represent our acts of valorous deeds on one blade, while the other should symbolize our family. With this vigorous immortal weapon, we must charge into the melee and bloody our blades as we rend asunder the heads of our foes in a glorious tempest of delight. The blood that spatters upon our armor shall ensure our invincibility.
#68
The Genetic Decline of the West
By Richard Lynn

The Genetic Decline of the West

The genetic decline of the populations of western nations was first recognised in the 1850s and 1860s by Benedict Morel in France and Francis Galton in England. Neither seems to have known of the work of the other, but they arrived independently at the same conclusion that contemporary populations were undergoing "retrogressive evolution" in respect of health, intelligence and moral character.

Both Morel and Galton identified the cause of this deterioration as lying in the relaxation of natural selection. Normally in human and animal populations, natural selection eliminates the unfit, allowing the more fit to survive. The survival of the fittest keeps the population genetically sound by weeding out genetically unfit individuals, rather in the same way as a gardener keeps a garden in good order by constantly removing the weeds. When it is working properly, natural selection in human populations has two strings to its bow. With the first it inflicts high mortality and with the second it imposes low fertility on those with genetic disorders, poor intelligence and weak moral character. Morel and Galton perceived that both these strings were failing in the middle decades of the nineteenth century. It was as if the gardener had quit and the garden was going to seed.

Up to this time, natural selection had worked well in western nations. The populations had the high mortality and the differential fertility that are needed for natural selection to operate. Couples typically had six or seven children, but among the population as a whole an average of only a little over two survived to adulthood. High death rates tended to eliminate the unfit, the unintelligent and those with weak moral character because they were more vulnerable to death from disease and from their own inability to survive.

Natural selection also operated by the more healthy, the more intelligent and those with strong moral character having higher fertility. The principal reason for this was that people with these qualities are more efficient at earning a living and this meant that they were better fed and more fertile. Another factor was that there were strong social controls preventing those lacking these qualities from having children. If they did have children there was no welfare state to provide for them. They were generally put into foundling homes, where most of them died. It was a harsh world, but it served the purpose of keeping the population genetically sound.

It was in the middle decades of the nineteenth century that the force of natural selection against the unfit began to weaken. It weakened first against those with poor health largely as a result of improvements in sewage disposal and the provision of pure drinking water, which reduced deaths among the unhealthy from infectious diseases.

In the present century natural selection against those with poor health has been further weakened by medical progress in the treatment of genetic disorders and diseases. Advances in surgery have enabled those to live who would formerely have died. The first important advance was made in 1912 with the development of surgical treatment for pyloric stenosis, a genetic defect of the narrowing of the stomach which prevents food being ingested. Later in the century, surgical organ transplants have made it possible to preserve the lives of those with a variety of genetic defects. In addition, successful treatments have been found for a large number of genetic disorders such as hemophilia, diabetes, phenylketonuria, cystic fibrosis and many others. The development of these treatments has enabled many with these disorders to live to adulthood and have children, to some of whom they pass their defective genes. The result of the medical progress is that the prevalence of many of these disorders is doubling or tripling in every generation.

We are also experiencing genetic deterioration in respect of intelligence. In previous centuries, when there was high child mortality, the children who died would have tended to be less intelligent. This was partly because the unintelligent are not so good at looking after themselves, and even today the unintelligent have higher mortality from disease and accidents than the intelligent. Another reason was that the unintelligent children have unintelligent parents, who are less competent at looking after them. Even today, in the modern welfare state, infant and child mortality is substantially higher among children of unintelligent parents than among those of the more intelligent.

However, the major factor responsible for an increase in the numbers of the unintelligent has been the development of modern forms of contraception. This began in the 1870s with the invention and mass marketing of the latex condom and has been followed by the development of further contraceptives such as the intro-uterine device and the pill. Once these modern contraceptives became avilable, it was inevitable that they would be used more efficiently by the intelligent than by the unintelligent. The result of this has been that the intelligent began to have fewer children. This trend started in the second half of the last century and has persisted up to the present day.

We know from twin and adoption studies that intelligence is partly under genetic control. This means that there are genes for high intelligence and for low intelligence. Once those with low intelligence started to have more children, and those children no longer died in significant numbers in childhood, the genes for low intelligence increased in the population and the number of genes for high intelligence fell. The result of this has been a genetic deterioration of intelligence among western populations.

The conclusion reached by Morel and Galton that the intelligence of western populations is deteriorating was examined by a number of biological and social scientists early in the twentieth century. Several attempts were made to determine the extent of this deterioration. This was done by measuring the intelligence of representative samples of the population at two points in time. Studies of this kind produced the surprising result that the expected decline had not taken place. On the contrary, it was found that intelligence as measured by intelligence tests has actually been increasing in western populations throughout most of the twentieth century.

There is not as yet any agreed explanation for this increase. Some believe that there has only been an improvement of test taking skills. Others maintain that the increase is genuine and has been brought about by improvements in nutrition, education or various kinds of cognitive stimulation from TV, books and the like. Whatever the explanation, it seems that the deterioration of the genetic quality of western populations in respect of intelligence has been compensated for several decades by environmental improvements. This compensation cannot be expected to continue indefinitely. At some point, the impact of the environmental improvements will peter out and intelligence will begin to decline. The best available estimate of the rate of this decline is that it will be about one IQ point per generation.

The third respect in which modern populations are deteriorating is moral character. This broad trait comprises self discipline, the motivation to work for long term goals, law abidingness and a sense of civic responsibility. It is conspicuously lacking in criminals and in the underclass with its sociopathic value system. Moral character has a genetic basis. This has been established by twin studies, which have shown that identical twins separated shortly after birth and reared in different families are quite similar in respect of their moral character, showing that a genetic determination is involved. In addition, it has been found that adopted children resemble their biological parents more closely than their adoptive parents, showing that moral character is transmitted genetically from parents to children.

From the last decades of the nineteenth century those with weak moral character have had more children than those in whom moral character is strong. There are various ways in which this has been shown. For instance, male criminals have about 70 per cent more children than the law abiding population, while among females in the United States in the first half of the 1990s high school dropouts had an average of 2.6 children as compared with only 1.8 for American women as a whole.

The principal explanation for the high fertility of those with weak moral character is the same as the reason for the high fertility of the unintelligent, namely their inefficient use of contraception. Once modern methods of contraception became available, it was inevitable that they would be used more effectively by those with strong moral character because they are more conscientious and responsible, just as it was inevitable that contraception would be used more effectively by the intelligent because they are more efficient. Thus, the development of modern contraception produced the inevitability of genetic deterioration in respect of both intelligence and moral character.

Because weak moral character is transmitted through families, the high fertility of those with weak moral character should have led to an increase in their numbers in the population. This has certainly occurred. One expression of this is the increase in crime which has taken place in the last half century throughout the economically developed world. Another is the increase of the underclass which, defined as able bodied long term unemployed men has approximately doubled in the United States from the early 1960s up to the present. Similar rises have taken place in Eurpoe. Yet another is the increase of single mothers living on welfare, up in the United States from 2.5 per cent of all the female population in 1960 to 10 per cent in 1990. All these rises are due partly to an increase in the numbers of those with a gentically based impoverished moral character, although this is not to say that other factors, such as the increasingly generous welfare support, have not also played a part.

The genetic deterioration of western nations poses serious problems. The increase in the numbers of those with genetic disorders who can be successfully treated raises the cost of medical provision. The decline of intelligence will produce a deterioration in the quality of our civilisation. Intelligence is a major determinant of the effectiveness with which jobs are performed. As intelligence declines there will be fewer people with high IQs to maintain standards in the arts and sciences, the professions and business, and fewer with good average IQs to carry out routine skilled jobs such as those of the plumber and the electrician. At the same time, there will be increasing numbers of those whose intelligence is too low for useful employment.

No less serious is the problem of deteriorating moral character. It will bring about an increasingly immoral society. Crime will continue to grow. Standards of honesty and integrity in national life will decline. The smooth functioning of the economy and of social relationships depends on trust and will be impaired as the moral foundations of public and private relationships are eroded.

All this was foreseen by Francis Galton, who wrote in 1869 in his HEREDITARY GENIUS that in a mature civilisation, like our own, "there is a steady check upon the fertility of the abler classes; the improvident and unambitious are those who chiefly keep up the breed. So the race gradually deteriorates, becoming in each successive generation less fit for a high civilisation".

In the first half of the twentieth century Galton's view was endorsed by a large number of biological and social scientists. As recently as the 1960s the problem was restated by William Shockley, the Nobel prizewinner in physics. Shockley coined the word DYSGENICS for this retrogressive evolution and urged that it needed wider recognition and discussion of how it could be overcome. But Shockley's warnings went unheeded and in the last quarter century understanding of the problem has been lost. It is time to revive public recognition of this serious threat to the future of our civilisation.

[Richard Lynn was professor of psychology at the University of Ulster from 1972 to 1995. This article is based on his book DYSGENICS, published by Praeger.]


#69
A Short Green Essay
by Brother Justinian

A Short Green Essay

Most people value a healthy body over all other things; it is seen as a prize which the wisest among us zealously guard. Anyone who has ever faced a serious illness can attest to the fact that when one is sick, one can rarely find enjoyment in any task.

While people certainly enjoy good health, they fail to realize that without a clean environment, a fit body is impossible to maintain.

It is truly strange to ponder the dual standard which is invoked by the general public on the health issue. Stripping the forests bare and dumping poisons haphazardly is certainly profitable for the few. However, there can not be any benefit to the vast majority of our people of the world.

As we labor in the service of our kin and comrades, it is imperative that we make every effort to see that future work on their behalf goes efficiently and smoothly. We must constantly guard against shortsighted advancement today at the expense of future gains. It remains imperative that we have a vision of the future as we build the present, lest we leave a task incomplete which will remove a portion of our expected goal.

Within the collective unconscious of the White Race, there has always been a love for the soil. From our earliest beginnings, we deified the Earth as our mother goddess, reveling in her marvelous fertility and holding festivals to honor the bounty she so generously bestowed upon us. We were a primitive and rather backward people then, with an innocence and a superstitious nature.

The modern era has seen the birth of a more enlightened age, with a flood of new technology-based devices. Marvelous new luxuries are available to us which were impossible to conceive of just a generation ago. With all of the time and energy our new advances have saved us, it would seem to a casual observer that we ought to be enjoying an unbelievable surplus of health, both physical and mental. Sadly, the opposite is true. While we as a people enjoy a life of leisure and splendor, we are plagued with illness as never before. It seems that as we have learned new strategies to artificially maximize our pleasures, we have forgotten how to cope with our most basic evolutionary traits.

As we wallow in the excess of our consumer society, we are forgetting those who will follow us. The waste of our glorious pillage will one day be settled through our offspring's famine. The natural world has a law of conservation, after all. That which we take today, someone must one day give back. Newton's third law clearly states that all of our actions have reactions. While we may not detect a reaction immediately, the chaos which we sow today will reap hell on our children's lives.

It was over the span of millions of years that we evolved to our present state. Our harsh, northern environment culled out all but the most fit, intelligent, and visionary specimens. We evolved with an instinct for the ebb and flow of Nature's cycles. During our evolution, we had no need to know the details of the laws which could make or break our survival. When a city became too populous, our ancestors ran out of fuel, forcing the citizens to abandon that particular habitat, scatter, and search out a new home. The scars which primitive men left on the physical world were thus allowed to heal. With today's fossil fuels, urbanization and popular concentrations expand unchecked and exponentially. The massive bulk of our concentrated and cosmopolitan urban areas leads to sickness, both of the people and of the world around them.

A choice faces us. We have it in our power to begin reversing the damage which has already been done to us and to our Earth, or we have the option of continuing to squander what little is left of our priceless resources. If we choose the former, our path will be painful, but our descendants will reap rich rewards. If we opt for the latter, either through malice or complacency , future generations of White people will curse us in our graves.

With the vision of our Founder, Ben Klassen, embodied within the First Commandment, Creators pledge their lives to secure a future for their children. Their very existence is wholly dependent upon a healthy and natural homeland. As we have claimed this world as our own, we must accept the responsibility for a quick return of this Earth to a healthy and sustainable status.  The physical and mental health of us and our descendants is worthy of our consideration, and future generations deserve no less.
#70
Battling the "Human" Parasite
by (Reverend) Matt Hayhow

Battling the "Human" Parasite

Despite hundreds of years of "persecution", the Jews have yet to learn their lesson. The instinctive controls which limit most parasites to just enough blood to survive, are missing or have been overridden by the Hebes' greed. On the brink of fulfilling every parasite's unattainable aim--the total control of the host--their very nature and believing their own propaganda is ruining their chance to bring about their utopian (Jewtopian?) dream.

That Jews have an unquenchable thirst for gold and power cannot be contradicted. The spider's web of international finance, government, and media they control is slowly and steadily enveloping most every White people in the world. However, it appears that this is not enough for them. As they near their goal of every Jew a king, every goy a slave, their eagerness and voraciousness seem to be unrestrainable. Their rabid groping for practically every form of wealth (real estate in France, money in Switzerland) and power (the media, governments, schools, and churches) must, as it has done time and again throughout history , blow up in their faces.

A conspiracy can only work if few are aware of the machinations of the conspirators. The Hebes' daily Holocaustian diatribes and whining in nearly every newspaper is beginning to backfire. Since Jews really believe they are the "chosen" and that they have the right to impose their will on the "cattle", they are blind to the reality of their situation. Their arrogant disregard for the concerns of their subjects has led them to forget caution. This premature and pompous presumptuousness is calling attention to their nefarious aims.

It is Jewry's nature as a parasitic people which drives them, and it is the nature of Nature to seek a balance. A parasite which takes too much alerts its host/victim or kills it. Either way, the parasite dies. Jewry is a tapeworm in the body of our people that has already awakened some of the defenses of the White Race. We are these defenses. Our job is to arouse and alert the rest of our Racial body so we may rid ourselves of this lethal parasite. Should we delay too long, we also will die.

As Ben Klassen said, Nature may seek a balance, but it does not do the balancing itself. An unfit organism may be warned yet not be able or healthy enough to deal with the threat. If it is unable to continue the struggle for life, it is culled. Should many of the species or race be susceptible to the assault, whatever form it may take, they face extinction.

Are we "fit"--active and effective--enough to save ourselves? Is our Racial body strong and sound? Can we not only resist these parasites, but be rid of them and recover? No, not if we are polluted with dissimilar blood, poisonous ideas, or debilitating chemicals. Non-white integration, Jewish Christianity, Communism and Capitalism, guilt-filled propaganda from schools and churches and unhealthy foods and drugs--like the anesthesia a parasite imbues to invade its host, has dulled our defense mechanisms. The narcotic effect of the above has delayed and dissociated our response to the Yid's assault, but it hasn't stopped it. That you are reading this is evidence of the awakening of White instinct.

Thanks to the genius of our Founder, Ben Klassen, in Creativity we have the program for resisting the parasites' control and reinvigorating our precious people. Our first step in protecting our Racial body is to do as the cells in our bodies do in the face of infection; arouse and alert enough of our fellow antibodies to handle the Yid invasion. We have the perfect natural antitoxin in Creativity; now we need only spread it to our White Racial Comrades and the Jews' efforts will be for naught. Once again as in the case of our bodies' defenses--the most integral part of neutralizing Jew and mud contamination is the awakening and organizing of our people to safeguard Nature's Finest Creation--the White Race.

Creativity is fundamentally a pragmatic religion, as is its basis: the Eternal Laws of Nature. The lessons of the world and history are central to Creativity's program of propagandizing, proselytizing, and organizing. The World Church of the Creator aims to build a Whiter and Brighter World through activity, not merely deploring and lamenting, but by offering a plan for solving the problems our people face.

In general, this solution is to reevaluate the values of Whites, to change the suicidal and delusional thinking of our White Racial Comrades, and, like the antibodies discussed above, to build up the general health and immunity of our White Racial community through individual and collective effort. Specifically, this means using our industry and creativity to get the word out. Pontifex Maximus Hale has shown us the way through his exemplary efforts.

We can expect the Jews to continue to haughtily flaunt their wealth and power, causing many of our White Racial Comrades to look for an alternative. We know the only choice that ensures the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of the White Race is Creativity, but do they? We must make damn sure they have the opportunity to learn! It's either extinction or survival. Which it will be depends solely on our energy and zeal in promoting the One and Only, True and Revolutionary White Racial Religion--Creativity! Let us awaken and mobilize the mighty White juggernaut! RAHOWA!
 
 
Church Links The Holybooks W.R.L. Friends Holoco$t Links
 

Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]
 
The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]



Creator Origins
Church of the Creator: Founded by Ben Klassen - Year Zero (1973CE)
Your Own Creator Forum: Continuously Online Since 25AC (1998CE)
Creativity Alliance & Church of Creativity: Founded 30AC (2003CE)
Links: The History of Creativity | The Creator Calendar Explained
» Save the White Race - Join the Church of Creativity «

23 Words
What is good for the White Race is of the Highest Virtue;
What is bad for the White Race is the Ultimate Sin.


Main Website   Forum RSS Feed   Send Mail   About Us
Copyright © 30 AC - AC (2003 CE - CE), Creativity Alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Back to the Top