Messages

They won't because that would involve them, or more likely their stooges, having to prove in court that what we say is untrue.. and even they realise that in a court they own and control, they still couldn't do that.. also they don't want to give us any publicity.

What they will do, however, is pick on us as individuals (if they can). I think the thing they forget is that we are a church in the proper sense. An "ecclesia", a congregation of brothers and sisters that stand with each other no matter what they throw at us.

It is an aspiration to aim for. We, as in this generation, are ruined. Sure enough, we woke up and saw the reality, but not before all the crap was fed to us for years and years.
No, we aspire to have our future generations born free from all the said chemicals and brain pollution. Of course, that doesn't give us an excuse to do as we please, as we should aspire to be as healthy as possible, but as I said above, we are 'ruined' in that regard, already a part of the system we are trying to break. 

It is balls.. though in my own case, I usually only use a couple of paragraphs, and then link the rest of the article.

What does fair use allow? Under fair use rules, it may be possible to use quotations or excerpts, where the work has been made available to the public, (i.e. published). Provided that:

• The use is deemed acceptable under the terms of fair dealing.
• That the quoted material is justified, and no more than is necessary is included.
• That the source of the quoted material is mentioned, along with the name of the author.

   
Typical free uses of work include:

• Inclusion for the purpose of news reporting.
• Incidental inclusion.
• National laws typically allow limited private and educational use.

     
   
https://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/copyright/p09_fair_use

Just bog standard replies from the police there.. as for the article 

Feel free to throw some over here, as I reckon we feel a bit left out :-D