Main Menu
• Shortened Link: W23.link » CreativityAlliance.com
• Beat the Censors on Social Media with ᵂ23 ᴰᴼᵀ ᴸᴵᴺᴷ
• Free @Rev.JoelDufresne P.O.W. USA - Prison Martyr - Bogus Charges
• Free @JamesCostello P.O.W. UK - 5 Years for Anti-Immigration Stickers
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Maritz

#366
Afrikaners Not "Minorities" - Minorities Not Minorities Either  :o

Afrikaner minority-rights activists yesterday launched a determined verbal attack at the African Human Rights Day conference in Parktown - with Afrikaner intellectuals climbing into the draft report drawn up by ANC-officials for the UN Human Minority Rights Commission conference in Geneva on November 11. This event was heavily-censored by the SABC-news TV however, which merely reported the following :

"South Africa does not need a special dispensation to cater for indigenous groups and minorities as its Constitution protects and guarantees the cultural, linguistic and religious rights of all her people," the IEC "president" Pansy Tlakula told a meeting looking at minority rights. However, the often very angry, heated debate between the small number of Afrikaners and the black majority at this meeting - and which had led to this statement by Tlakula - was not reported by the SABC-TV at all. And even though they also interviewed Dr Dan Roodt, the Afrikaner intellectual who headed this highly-critical minority-delegation, the SABC-TV chose not to broadcast this interview thus far.

Yesterday's African Human Rights Day conference was called by the SA human rights commission to gain the stamp of approval for their concept report - however the Afrikaner intellectual delegation - comprised of Dr Pieter Duvenage, Dan Roodt, Louis Smuts and Andre Alkema, sharply criticised the submitted draft, saying that the Afrikaner delegation did not agree to its wording - and would be getting together with other Afrikaner groups to draw up their own "dissenting minority-opinion report" in time for submission to the November 11 2009 UN conference in Geneva, Switzerland.
At the start of the morning-session, while Dr Dan Roodt - the businessman and author who founded the activist Pro-Afrikaans Action Group [PRAAG] was holding a press conference outside the SABC-radio and TV station about the issue, Dr Duvenage was inside engaged in hot debates with delegates.

Stating his held viewpoint - as a leading member of the Afrikaner minority in the country - Duvenage said the South African state "can no longer be viewed as having any legitimacy because it cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens any longer". Moreover, he said - amidst loud and often very angry protestations from the black delegates - that "the presence of the Afrikaner minority was not even recognised by the SA State any longer".

This raised the ire of one featured black conference-speaker, Ms Colet Letlojane - who flew into Duvenhage`s claim with counter-accusations of "disloyalty towards the black majority which had forgiven him [Duvenage] for Apartheid"

After the morning session, the newly-appointed head of the SA Human Rights commission, "adv." Tseliso Thipanyane, was standing around amidst a large crowd of admirers and bystanders, and was heard to joke in a demeaning way about the Afrikaner-minority delegates, repeatedly chanting; "I want my Afrikaans, I want my Afrikaans" - to the huge amusement of bystanders.

"900 people killed in political violence during apartheid - but tens of thousands of Africaners have already been killed by the black majority after 1994 ..."

During the morning session, when the few Afrikaner delegates such as Duvenage were enduring verbal attacks in highly-emotional language by many other delegates, Dr Roodt also responded by saying that "he was pleased that Duvenage was forgiven for apartheid".

"However if one places this forgiveness towards Duvenage against the fact that 900 people were killed during political violence throughout the entire apartheid-period [1948-1994] in South Africa, while thus far some 750,000 people have already been murdered since 1994, amongst whom also were many tens of thousands of Afrikaners, Duvenhage should actually show forgiveness towards his accusers rather than the other way around, because "it's the vast black majority who are committing this horrific crimes," said Roodt.

This comment put the cat amongst the pigeons - with black delegates then attacking the very concept a "minority group". One official of the Justice department even claimed that the concept "minority group" was a "dynamic concept and that this doesn`t mean that South Africa was comprised of minorities ..."

During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also vehemently denied Dr Roodt's statistical submission that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was a "lie" . Dr Roodt then asked that "the true apartheid-era political death rates" be published, since these he had quoted had come directly from the SA Truth and Reconciliation Commission.[ ... set up by the commies themselves]

Many of the other black speakers also claimed that the concept of "minority rights" was born during apartheid, that South Africa now was one homogenous nation without any minorities.

Another government official also said that if minority groups joined the ruling party [i.e. the ANC] they could participate in politics.

Minorities in SA have no rights to influence political power

Dr Roodt responded to this by asking whether this official thus was "lodging a plea for a one-party state" with this invitation - to which this official responded that "minorities did not have any rights to influence political power nor have any political influence ..."

The ANC-executives at the conference then tried to defuse the debate about Afrikaner-minority rights by changing the subject altogether - namely to that of the "rights of non-heterosexual people" - submitting that this group should be viewed as a "minority group" and that this should be reflected in the concept-draft to the UN meeting on November 11.
Dr Roodt however continued the Afrikaner-rights debate, pointing to the example of the voting-districts` demarcation of the Pretoria municipality by Dr Michael Sutcluffe as a "prime example of discrimination and suppression of minority groups" where primarily Afrikaner-suburbs were cut up and added to black-majority-voter suburbs to guarantee an ANC-majority vote in those new voting districts.

This raised the ire of Mrs Nkaro Mateto, senior manager of the Independent Electoral Commission - who said that she was a member of this demarcation commission for the Pretoria region - and that the purpose of the voting-district demarcations had not been to "discriminate" against Afrikaners, but rather to "integrate" them.

Dr Roodt replied to Mrs Mateto`s claim by noting that in his view, "integration was just an euphemism for forced assimilation" :

"There are three ways to commit genocide," he said: [1] "through ethnic cleansing, for instance by driving Afrikaners from the country through a variety of laws barring Afrikaners [from public life]; [2] by forced assimilation and through violence.

And all of these elements already exist in South Africa [targeting the Afrikaner minority]."

Then the Human Rights Commission chairman angrily replied that, "as a Sotho whose ancestral lands were taken away before 1930 he, as a member of the black majority, was not prepared to make any kind of concessions to the civil rights of the Afrikaner minority." During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also denied Dr Roodt`s claim that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was "a lie" .

An Indian academic from the University of the Witwatersrand, "Prof" Ayesha Kajee and South African head of the International Human-rights exchange programme, then suffered an extraordinary anger-outburst, screaming that "hundreds of thousands of blacks were killed by Afrikaners during apartheid", and that "Dr Roodt can't establish fact from fiction."

Dr Roodt replied : "don't believe your own propaganda".  ;D

Throughout the conference, all the Afrikaner delegates submitted point-by-point criticisms of the concept-report placed before the conference delegates for "final approval". This document would then be tabled as representative of the entire SA population`s opinion at the 11 November UN Human Rights Commission meeting in Geneva.

Roodt and Duvenage submitted to the meeting that they would be drawing up a minority-opinion report which would be tabled together with the official government version - and that they would be calling on all Afrikaner organisations to help draw up such a minority report - and which would be submitted to the 11 November meeting.

Dr Roodt concluded that "from this meeting it also becomes clear - judging from the recriminations and accusations flying amongst the delegates - that the issue of minority rights in South Africa is an explosive situation".

[Source : Praag.co.za]


#367
Comedy/Humor / Government
Thu 22 Oct 2009
#368
In the late 90`s we had a similar problem in SA with the mudslums; a group called Pagad [People Against Gangsterism and Drugs] was formed in 1996; an islamic militant group. Pagad grew as an offshoot of the Islamic organisation Qibla. Qibla was inspired by the 1979 Iranian revolution, and sought to transform South Africa into a muslim state, adopting the slogan, "One solution : Islamic revolution". They further believed that politics cannot be separated from religion, and that muslims have a responsibility to oppose a non-muslim state, preaching martyrdom and revolution.

Pagad's campaign came to prominence in 1996 when a local gang leader, Rashaad Staggie, was beaten and burnt to death by a mob during a march to his home. Pagad's G-Force was operating in small cells, and was believed to be responsible for killing a large number of gang leaders, and urban terrorism — particularly bombings — in Cape Town. The bombings started in 1998, and included nine bombings in 2000. In addition to targeting gang leaders, bombing targets included South African authorities, moderate muslims, synagogues, gay nightclubs, tourist attractions, and Western-associated restaurants. The most prominent attack during this time was the bombing on 25 August 1998 of the Cape Town Planet Hollywood.

In September 2000, magistrate Pieter Theron, who was presiding in a case involving Pagad members, was murdered in a drive-by shooting. Pagad was also accused of anti-jewish statements and a petrol bomb attack on a kike bookshop owner. Between 1996 and 2000, 24 gang lords were murdered in the Cape Town region, pushing dealers out of Cape Flats to smaller towns. Initially, Pagad received quiet support from the South African government, because of its perceived ability to crack down on drug dealers better than police. But tolerance waned in early 1997, when Pagad-incited violence began taking the form of urban terrorism, leading to the deaths of innocent bystanders.

From July 1996 to December 1997, Pagad is alleged to have initiated 222 acts of violence against drug dealers and their property, involving attacks with conventional weapons and explosives, often pipe bombs. In 1997, Pagad's G-force began targeting anti-Qibla muslims. In 1998, academics and clerics critical of the G-force were also targeted. Just like their semetic brothers the jew, the mudslums are not interested in peace but hate the Whites, and will destabilize White countries in order to dominate them, killing anyone in their way.


#369
African News / Re: World Cup 2010
Thu 22 Oct 2009
Germans Told To Wear Bullet-proof Vests

Germany's World Cup stars have been warned to expect to wear bullet-proof vests if they venture away from the team hotel at next year's tournament in South Africa. The head of Leverkusen-based security firm BaySecur, who look after the the German Football Federation [DFB] and their guests when the national team play away from Germany, says their stars like Michael Ballack must take extra care in South Africa.

BaySecur is one of the firms expected to be employed by the DFB while the team is involved in the tournament which runs from June 11 until July 11 when the final will be held at Johannesburg's Soccer City stadium. "The possibility for the players of moving outside of the hotel boundaries should be kept to a minimum," BaySecur's Guenter Schnelle told German magazine Sport-Bild.

"Otherwise there must be a full escort : armed security guards and bullet-proof vests for the players." The German Football Federation [DFB] are already looking to step up security around the team hotel in Pretoria for the World Cup. Because of high crime rates in the republic, the DFB are taking no risks with security, says their security boss Helmut Spahn, and are looking to recruit 20 extra security guards for the team's stay at their five-star accommodation.

Private bodyguards will protect the players both within and around the Velmore Grande hotel in Gauteng. "We will probably use more personnel than we would normally have," said Spahn, who will spend four days in South Africa next week looking at security arrangements. "We need to first of all get an idea of what security arrangements are already in place for both the team and the media.

"Then we will decide then whether to improve the security measures or whether they are sufficient." According to Spahn, there is little chance the DFB will rely only on local security guards in South Africa and Germany's federal police force is already in discussions with the DFB on the issue.

[Source : Sunday Times]

#370
Every now and again we have some mud or liberal White who wants to tell us that Apartheid is to blame for all black failures. One of these failures is the poor performance of blacks when it comes to graduating from high school with a matric certificate. When faced with Logic ... these assholes fall out the bus.

The current matriculants of South Africa are about 18 or 19 years old. That means they were born after mandela was released from prison and all Apartheid laws have been abandoned. Since then blacks have enjoyed "Affirmative Action" and "Black Economic Empowerment" and many have become stinking rich from this blatant racist discrimination and blacks being advantaged in the work place. Blacks enjoy quota systems at universities that advantage them over Whites, coloureds and indians. When they are finished with university they get further advantaged when they apply for a job, because of AA and BEE. Every time they change jobs they get further advantaged through more AA and BEE ... yet blacks still lag behind the rest of the races in South Africa and will do so forever.

Blacks were not the only ones who were so called "disadvantaged" by Apartheid. Coloureds, indians and chinese were all "suffering" under Apartheid, yet the indians and chinese were some of the richest people in South Africa under "Evil Apartheid". Amazing don't you think ? The only ones who constantly claim to have been victimized were the useless nigger.

The ANC constantly wants to tell the world how Apartheid robbed blacks from their education. This is total and utter nonsense. We who grew up during Apartheid will tell you about thousands of schools built for blacks by the White Apartheid government. Universities for nignogs and coloureds were common for anyone who wanted to study further. One just needs to look around in SA today to see the many black and coloured academics, lawyers, doctors, etc that all got their education because of the wonderful Apartheid system, not inspite of it. Compared to the rest of Africa, South African blacks had the highest literacy and tertiary education rates on the continent, especially during the 1980's. Despite all the schools we Whites built for the nigger, they would burn it all down. They did not want the White man's education. They said it was because they had to learn Afrikaans - what bullshit !

I want to know what their excuse is today. None of todays black matriculants ever experienced Apartheid. Why do they not want to study ? Blacks today can attend any White school they wish for free. Buses are organised for them from the townships to school and back again. Even their school clothes are for free if they are too poor. Blacks today have NO EXCUSES.

Below is a report on the MEC of education in the Western Cape paying a surprise visit to two black schools in black townships who just happens to be the two worst performing schools of the province ... what does he find ... something that we have known for years. Blacks simply have no interest in studying and educating themselves. School is a place where you get together to find someone to bonk and where you can buy your choice of drug. That is the only reason the MEC found 19 matrics actually present at a school that should have around 120 matriculants.

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=124&art_id=vn20091016131727503C300957

But that is not all ... when niggers fail matric on a massive scale, The ANC government just throws more White taxpayer's money at it ... A R135 million [$1=R7.35] in fact in the form of a "second chance remedial project" for useless blacks who keep on failing ... a second time ... a third time ... etc.

Blacks are a failed race. No amount of money thrown at them will ever bring them up to the standards of Whites. Evolution takes thousands of years. Blacks should be separated and allowed to evolve at a natural pace, if thats possible. They will be happy and we will be happy. Liberals commies should stop lying to blacks and telling them they are equal to us. They never have been and never will be. Blacks should just aspire to be the best Kaffirs they can ever be ... you know the type that still says "Baas"[Master" ... now that is a good Kaffir.

http://www.sowetan.co.za/News/Article.aspx?id=1080121#





 
 
Church Links The Holybooks W.R.L. Friends Holoco$t Links
 

Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]

The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]



Creator Origins
Church of the Creator: Founded by Ben Klassen - Year Zero (1973CE)
Your Own Creator Forum: Continuously Online Since 25AC (1998CE)
Creativity Alliance & Church of Creativity: Founded 30AC (2003CE)
Links: The History of Creativity | The Creator Calendar Explained
» Save the White Race - Join the Church of Creativity «

23 Words
What is good for the White Race is of the Highest Virtue;
What is bad for the White Race is the Ultimate Sin.


Main Website   Forum RSS Feed   Send Mail About Us
Copyright © 30 AC - AC (2003 CE - CE), Creativity Alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Back to the Top