Messages

[Black Launch Racist Hate Attack On White Students]

Black Launch Racist Hate Attack On White Students

You'll never read about this incident in the English press - in fact its a miracle it even made it into the Afrikaans media ! Die Volksblad newspaper, a small regional paper which serves Bloemfontein yesterday reported this shocking incident which I translated from the original Afrikaans. Nobody's been arrested and as is the case with all black on White hate crimes and racist attacks, the incident is quickly being covered up as if it never happened. Six White female students belonging to the University of the Free State in Bloem were attacked by a mob of blacks who hurled bricks, threatened them with rape and racially abused the shocked women.

In a racist incident which is strongly reminiscent of the racial attacks and riots at the University of The Orange Freestate following last year's violent incidents involving the Reitz video debacle, six women were gratuitously attacked by blacks. Fortunately nobody was hurt. The women students [who requested anonymity] went for a walk on the campus on Thursday night. They were en route to their dorms from the campus swimming pool complex when the incident happened. A large group of students from various dormitories were revelling near the pool area. The six girls decided to leave the pool area after most other students had left.

"We felt safe because the campus was busy and there were students everywhere" said one. Various dorms had had parties on Thursday night and many students were standing around in front of their dorms chatting and socialising. When the women walked past the faculty for Agriculture, they saw a group of black students sitting on the grass behind the building. "We didn't worry about them as we thought they were busy playing soccer" the girls said.

As the White girls walked past the group of blacks, one suddenly picked up a brick and threw it in their direction. "At first I thought they were joking, because he didn`t throw it too hard but then he picked it up and threw it at us again, this time really hard". After this, the rest of the blacks joined in, picking up bricks and hurling it at the shocked girls who started running away. The blacks ran after the girls, screaming "f*ck off from our campus you white bitches. We are going to rape you". 

The terrified girls ran away and and were chased by the blacks for quite a distance. The women approached two  security guards and told them about the incident but the guards completely ignored them. They then went to their dorms and reported it to the security guard there, who shrugged his shoulders and refused to help. The students asked that the name of their dormitory be withheld for fear of victimisation. "We`re not sure if the incident was related to a protest meeting held at the campus earlier on Thursday, or whether the blacks merely wanted to vent their frustrations on us" they said. "We just think that its a serious problem that the security guards refused to help us. A few other White girls walked back alone from the pool area, what if it happened to one of them ?"

They reported the incident to the UV Security Services on Friday. Mrs Lacea Loader, UOFS spokesperson confirmed that they were aware of the incident. "The matter was reported to our security services and is being investigated. We strongly condemn behaviour like this and students must refrain from making themselves guilty of such unacceptable behaviour". Loader said she didn't want to speculate on whether the incident was related to the current Reitz debacle.

[Source : Volksblad]

A "white pride" group, Right Wing Resistance [RWR], claims to be patrolling New Brighton streets that "the police and the system has all but given up on". The group, linked to North Island-based white power activist Kyle Chapman, says Christchurch is the centre of a "white pride" revival. Films of their initiation ceremonies were listed on an internet site for "white nationalists" called WNTube.

A message board used by the group, Stormfront.org, said the group was performing "crimewatch patrols" aimed at "cutting down on homie [American rap-style] vandalism and muggings that have become common on the east side of CHCH. The police and the system in general has all but given up on the poor areas and it is left to us to sort this out now," it said. A member of the group, who spoke anonymously to The Press, said "sporadic" patrols had started in New Brighton about five months ago.

"Locals were getting very upset with youths, particularly Polynesian youths, standing over people and vandalising." The groups of between five and 15 members did not carry weapons. "No doubt people will want to label us skinheads, but that's just a way for society to put a label on us, put us in a bracket. I know ... that vigilantism is illegal and it's frowned upon, but we're living in modern times, police resources are stretched, and they're not being able to cover the ground as effectively as they would like."

The group was a white pride group as opposed to white power, he said. "We're not about going around bashing up Polynesians or Asians. If a European youth was found vandalising property : We'd probably say `Hey, what are you doing ? That's not really the white way." Police said they had not heard of the group and denied they had "given up" on New Brighton. Detective Sergeant Andrew Fabish, of the New Brighton police, said it sounded like the group was "trying to get themselves a profile".

New Brighton Residents Association member George Aorangi Stanley said 'boot boys' had been spotted 'hanging around looking menacing'. "I don't know if you'd consider it patrolling. I just consider them as contributing to the tension". The group had correctly tapped into local concern about crime and safety, she said. "It's the main topic of conversation at the [Residents Association] meetings."

Aorangi Stanley said the association had discussed doing their own patrols – a "reclaim the night" action – to increase safety. Christchurch Mayor Bob Parker said the trend was "unacceptable. I would be disturbed to find out that we had a vigilante approach to security going on. Well-meaning amateurs could easily become loose cannons", Parker said. Anything associated with Chapman and his "brand" would come with "a lot of history attached", he said.

"I would urge these folk that if [they want to do security], their first point of contact should be the police." The initiation ceremonies on WNTube site showed about 12 shaven-headed men in what appeared to be a garage. Black banners with the group's insignia, a skull over a bent cross, were displayed on the walls. An oath, titled "Kyle's oath", was read and members were "knighted" by a leader with a sword. Long-time white power activist Chapman was involved with the group until he moved to the North Island several months ago.

A newsletter sent by an umbrella group called the Nationalist Alliance said the Right Wing Resistance was the 'active organisation of New Zealand'. "The Christchurch RWR is now the largest Right-wing organisation Christchurch has ever seen. When new branches are set up, it is no longer a couple of people joining but whole crews of men willing to work hard."

Source : http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/news/national-news/2999197/Right-wing-vigilantes-on-patrol-in-Christchurch

[White Boy Stabbed Over "Racist" Hello]

White Boy Stabbed Over "Racist" Hello

Vanderbijlpark - A racist but "good-natured" greeting between two school friends has led to one of them being stabbed by fellow pupils who took offence. The knife only barely missed the 16-year-old victim's heart. Two pupils from Carel de Wet Technical High School in Vanderbijlpark greeted each other by saying "Hello, my boertjie", "Hello, my kaffertjie" on Friday morning.

A third schoolboy, aged 15, took offence when he heard the two boys greeting each other this way and confronted Jeandré Kruger, a Grade 10 pupil, about the matter. "The boy [who took offence], a Grade 9 pupil, grabbed me by my shirt and yanked me around, so I hit my head against his head," said Jeandré. "The two boys have been greeting each other like that for ages and to them it`s a joke," said Johan Kruger, Jeandré`s father, on Monday.

According to Jeandré he was walking towards his parents` car after school on Monday, when the boy who had confronted him on Friday called him aside outside the school`s property. "He was alone, but he took out a knife and stabbed me," said Jeandré. "The next moment I could feel someone else stabbing me twice in my back". Jeandré collapsed to his knees and saw his attackers - four pupils from the same school - running away. He stood up and ran toward his parents, who were waiting in their car. They informed the school principal before taking their son to a local hospital, where he received stitches.

"The doctor said Jeandré was lucky that the knife didn`t touch his heart or lungs," said Johan. "My son could have been dead if they stabbed him a few centimetres lower in the chest," said his mother, Yolanda Kruger. Johan says he has "no problem with race or skin colour", but he does have a problem with the actions of criminals. The parents will meet with the school principal, Gawie Richter, on Tuesday to discuss the matter further. "I just hope the guilty ones are punished," said Jeandré. According to Inspector Kinnie Steyn, the incident is being investigated by the Vanderbijlpark police.



[Source : Beeld]

[JEWS AND COMMUNISM IN SOUTH AFRICA]

JEWS AND COMMUNISM IN SOUTH AFRICA

Against the international background of heavy jewish involvement in communism, did the South African experience show any parallels ? Perhaps the best way to gain an insight into this topic is to quote from four books, three of which are by Jewish authors. The first book is "A history of communism in South Africa" by Dr Henry R Pike - 1985. I`ll do one each week.

A large number of jews have worked to promote communism in South Africa, as Pike's book indicates. Many of these jews were involved in the organization of trade unions, particularly black trade unions. Some of the names mentioned by Pike are A. Z. Berman - a noted marxist` who headed the Industrial Socialist League in Cape Town; the communist writer David Shub, Solly Sachs, secretary of the Garment Workers Union and expelled from and then readmitted to the South African Communist Party, Bennie Weinbren who directed the Non-European Trade Union Federation, Issy Diamond, Abraham Levy, Hymie Levin, Issie Wolfson, Julius Lewin, Louis Joffe, Dr Max Joffe, Molly [Zelikowitz] Wolton, Lazar Bach, Rebecca [Notlowitz] Bunting, Fanny Klenerman, Michael Harmel, Sam Kahn, Katy Kagan, Eli Weinberg, Yetta Barenblatt, Hymie Barsel, Leon and Norman Levy, Lionel Forman, Jacqueline and Rowley Arenstein, Errol and Dorothy Shanley, Monty Berman, Bertram Hirson and Neville Rubin.

Dr Pike [p 212-3] quotes from a South African Government Gazette Extraordinary [vol VI 16 Nov 1962 pp 2-28] which listed "persons who have been office-bearers, officers, members or active supporters of the Communist Party of South Africa". The list included 66 "clearly identifiable as Jews". At the time, the South African population was approximately 3 million Whites, while the South African jewish population was 110 000 [World Almanac 1958 p270]. So there was approximately one jew for every 26 Whites in the country. If there had been an equal distribution of Communist involvement between Whites and jews, the jewish membership of the Communist Party should have been one-twenty-sixth the White gentile representation. Instead, we find slightly more jews as members. In other words, jews were almost thirty times more likely to become members of the Communist Party than were White gentiles. If jews with non-jewish names were also counted, the ratio would be likely to have been considerably higher.

In theory this could be explained away as simple jewish concern for the welfare of the underdog, the lowest classes, and in the South African context, evidence of jewish sympathies across racial barriers, or non-racism. In testing such a hypothesis to see whether this is indeed the case, we can look at another instance. Such concerns have been notoriously, and very conspicuously, almost totally absent in the protracted conflict in the Middle East. There, international jewish support has been overwhelmingly and steadfastly in favor of the jewish israelis, and not of the palestinians who have lost their country, and in thousands of cases their lives, to the violent settlers from Eastern Europe and America. After all, the entire territory was under Palestinian political control until 1947. The jewish population of the area in 1917 was a mere 7% of the 700 000 inhabitants. The other 93% were arabs. In 1947 the united nations under tremendous US pressure gave the zionists, who owned only about 6% of the land, 56% of the territory of Palestine. Since then, there has been a steady take-over of the remaining territory by force, violence, warfare, bribery and stealth.

[Afrikaners Not "Minorities" - Minorities Not Minorities Either]

Afrikaners Not "Minorities" - Minorities Not Minorities Either 

Afrikaner minority-rights activists yesterday launched a determined verbal attack at the African Human Rights Day conference in Parktown - with Afrikaner intellectuals climbing into the draft report drawn up by ANC-officials for the UN Human Minority Rights Commission conference in Geneva on November 11. This event was heavily-censored by the SABC-news TV however, which merely reported the following :

"South Africa does not need a special dispensation to cater for indigenous groups and minorities as its Constitution protects and guarantees the cultural, linguistic and religious rights of all her people," the IEC "president" Pansy Tlakula told a meeting looking at minority rights. However, the often very angry, heated debate between the small number of Afrikaners and the black majority at this meeting - and which had led to this statement by Tlakula - was not reported by the SABC-TV at all. And even though they also interviewed Dr Dan Roodt, the Afrikaner intellectual who headed this highly-critical minority-delegation, the SABC-TV chose not to broadcast this interview thus far.

Yesterday's African Human Rights Day conference was called by the SA human rights commission to gain the stamp of approval for their concept report - however the Afrikaner intellectual delegation - comprised of Dr Pieter Duvenage, Dan Roodt, Louis Smuts and Andre Alkema, sharply criticised the submitted draft, saying that the Afrikaner delegation did not agree to its wording - and would be getting together with other Afrikaner groups to draw up their own "dissenting minority-opinion report" in time for submission to the November 11 2009 UN conference in Geneva, Switzerland.
At the start of the morning-session, while Dr Dan Roodt - the businessman and author who founded the activist Pro-Afrikaans Action Group [PRAAG] was holding a press conference outside the SABC-radio and TV station about the issue, Dr Duvenage was inside engaged in hot debates with delegates.

Stating his held viewpoint - as a leading member of the Afrikaner minority in the country - Duvenage said the South African state "can no longer be viewed as having any legitimacy because it cannot guarantee the safety of its citizens any longer". Moreover, he said - amidst loud and often very angry protestations from the black delegates - that "the presence of the Afrikaner minority was not even recognised by the SA State any longer".

This raised the ire of one featured black conference-speaker, Ms Colet Letlojane - who flew into Duvenhage`s claim with counter-accusations of "disloyalty towards the black majority which had forgiven him [Duvenage] for Apartheid"

After the morning session, the newly-appointed head of the SA Human Rights commission, "adv." Tseliso Thipanyane, was standing around amidst a large crowd of admirers and bystanders, and was heard to joke in a demeaning way about the Afrikaner-minority delegates, repeatedly chanting; "I want my Afrikaans, I want my Afrikaans" - to the huge amusement of bystanders.

"900 people killed in political violence during apartheid - but tens of thousands of Africaners have already been killed by the black majority after 1994 ..."

During the morning session, when the few Afrikaner delegates such as Duvenage were enduring verbal attacks in highly-emotional language by many other delegates, Dr Roodt also responded by saying that "he was pleased that Duvenage was forgiven for apartheid".

"However if one places this forgiveness towards Duvenage against the fact that 900 people were killed during political violence throughout the entire apartheid-period [1948-1994] in South Africa, while thus far some 750,000 people have already been murdered since 1994, amongst whom also were many tens of thousands of Afrikaners, Duvenhage should actually show forgiveness towards his accusers rather than the other way around, because "it's the vast black majority who are committing this horrific crimes," said Roodt.

This comment put the cat amongst the pigeons - with black delegates then attacking the very concept a "minority group". One official of the Justice department even claimed that the concept "minority group" was a "dynamic concept and that this doesn`t mean that South Africa was comprised of minorities ..."

During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also vehemently denied Dr Roodt's statistical submission that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was a "lie" . Dr Roodt then asked that "the true apartheid-era political death rates" be published, since these he had quoted had come directly from the SA Truth and Reconciliation Commission.[ ... set up by the commies themselves]

Many of the other black speakers also claimed that the concept of "minority rights" was born during apartheid, that South Africa now was one homogenous nation without any minorities.

Another government official also said that if minority groups joined the ruling party [i.e. the ANC] they could participate in politics.

Minorities in SA have no rights to influence political power

Dr Roodt responded to this by asking whether this official thus was "lodging a plea for a one-party state" with this invitation - to which this official responded that "minorities did not have any rights to influence political power nor have any political influence ..."

The ANC-executives at the conference then tried to defuse the debate about Afrikaner-minority rights by changing the subject altogether - namely to that of the "rights of non-heterosexual people" - submitting that this group should be viewed as a "minority group" and that this should be reflected in the concept-draft to the UN meeting on November 11.
Dr Roodt however continued the Afrikaner-rights debate, pointing to the example of the voting-districts` demarcation of the Pretoria municipality by Dr Michael Sutcluffe as a "prime example of discrimination and suppression of minority groups" where primarily Afrikaner-suburbs were cut up and added to black-majority-voter suburbs to guarantee an ANC-majority vote in those new voting districts.

This raised the ire of Mrs Nkaro Mateto, senior manager of the Independent Electoral Commission - who said that she was a member of this demarcation commission for the Pretoria region - and that the purpose of the voting-district demarcations had not been to "discriminate" against Afrikaners, but rather to "integrate" them.

Dr Roodt replied to Mrs Mateto`s claim by noting that in his view, "integration was just an euphemism for forced assimilation" :

"There are three ways to commit genocide," he said: [1] "through ethnic cleansing, for instance by driving Afrikaners from the country through a variety of laws barring Afrikaners [from public life]; [2] by forced assimilation and through violence.

And all of these elements already exist in South Africa [targeting the Afrikaner minority]."

Then the Human Rights Commission chairman angrily replied that, "as a Sotho whose ancestral lands were taken away before 1930 he, as a member of the black majority, was not prepared to make any kind of concessions to the civil rights of the Afrikaner minority." During the afternoon-session, the chief editor of the Department of foreign affairs` human-rights and humanitarian affairs, Pitso Montwedi, also denied Dr Roodt`s claim that the official apartheid-era death-rate was 900 people, saying this was "a lie" .

An Indian academic from the University of the Witwatersrand, "Prof" Ayesha Kajee and South African head of the International Human-rights exchange programme, then suffered an extraordinary anger-outburst, screaming that "hundreds of thousands of blacks were killed by Afrikaners during apartheid", and that "Dr Roodt can't establish fact from fiction."

Dr Roodt replied : "don't believe your own propaganda". 

Throughout the conference, all the Afrikaner delegates submitted point-by-point criticisms of the concept-report placed before the conference delegates for "final approval". This document would then be tabled as representative of the entire SA population`s opinion at the 11 November UN Human Rights Commission meeting in Geneva.

Roodt and Duvenage submitted to the meeting that they would be drawing up a minority-opinion report which would be tabled together with the official government version - and that they would be calling on all Afrikaner organisations to help draw up such a minority report - and which would be submitted to the 11 November meeting.

Dr Roodt concluded that "from this meeting it also becomes clear - judging from the recriminations and accusations flying amongst the delegates - that the issue of minority rights in South Africa is an explosive situation".

[Source : Praag.co.za]