Messages

All day long on May 29 2012, millions of listeners across SA heard the banned ANC-hatespeech song Kill the Boer chanted by top black church leaders and ANC-cabinet members seen by millions in news-broadcasts : all this broohaha about Zuma's penis is sweeping up the black population in a frenzy of hatespeech, as was seen outside Goodman's gallery in Johannesburg yesterday.

Whites warned by SA cabinet ministers, all-powerful SA Communist Party leadership.

Yesterday's  siege at the Goodman gallery was led by ANC secretary-general Gwede Mantashe, flanked by co-ruling Cosatu trade union movement leaders Sdumo Dlamini and Zwelinzima Vavi and SA Communist Party leader Blade Nzimande, Deputy Health Minister Gwen Ramokgopa and ANC national executive committee senior member Tony Yengeni. Dlamini and Vavi ditched their central executive committee meeting at Cosatu House to be at the march. COSATU president Sdumo Dlamini has lashed out at liberals saying they were using "spooks" like former president FW de Klerk to undermine the ANC leadership. Nzimande warned: "white liberals who are disrespecting us and to all whites, we are saying enough is enough." Some 5,000 demonstrators were counted and most were bused by the ANC from provinces including Limpopo, Mpumalanga and Northern Cape. Some walked from nearby Zoo Lake to the gallery :  - nhlabathih@sowetan.co.za http://www.sowetanlive.co.za/news/2012/05/30/enough-is-enough-blade-tells-whites On May 30 2012 the Goodman gallery reneged – agreeing to take down the painting's picture from their website – even though more than 3,900,000 websites worldwide by now all show that picture, according to Google today. However the SA cabinet still is not happy : they demand that the painting be destroyed altogether -  and not allowed to leave South Africa : it was sold for R16,000 to a German investor.

http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2012/05/kill-whites-anc-cabinet-church-leaders.html

[Part 7 – The Role Of A Government]

Part 7 – The Role Of A Government

By Mike Smith

When one asks most people, white or black, what the role of government is one will get various opinions depending on who one pose the question to, but in general most people believe that the role of government is to develop and maintain infrastructure, in other words build dams, roads, schools, etc. Their means of doing this (it is believed) is to tax the citizens. Most people also believe that the government (politicians and civil servants) steal some of this money out of the state coffers, and that is what we call corruption. They further believe that some governments steal more than others. Some build more schools and roads than others and a good government is the one who does not steal and who builds lots of "things" such as sport stadiums.

But in reality it basically works like this. Several political parties compete to rule the country to represent the people. The party that has the best sales pitch, that appears to be the most just will win, voted in by the majority population. Once in power the self-enrichment starts. The politicians do not care one bit about the people who have voted for them. Their sales pitches, lies, empty promises, bullshit and fraud is all just to get to the feeding trough and pocket the spoils, but open theft will soon end them into prison so they have to be sly about it. All governments spend more than they raise in taxes. Government officials borrow money from gigantic banks and other financial institutions to finance their building of roads, houses for the poor, etc. They then contract the jobs to companies that they themselves own, their families own, etc. This borrowed money ends up in the pockets of the politicians, but the loans needs to be paid back. This is where our taxes come in. Our taxes pay back to the banks what our governments have stolen.

The more liberal the government, the bigger the government structure will be and the bigger the theft, nepotism and corruption will be. Conservative and nationalist governments tends to be smaller and the corruption a lot less. The more uneducated the people of a country is, the least they will grasp this thieving principle and the fewer checks and balances will be kept on their thieving government. That is why liberal/socialist governments will introduce dumbed down education systems such as Outcomes Based Education and Training (OBET) to keep the people uneducated. In fact everything from sports to radio, newspapers and television will be changed to keep people ignorant of the theft going on behind the scenes. It is important to reiterate that theft and corruption happens in all governments to some extent. Some of them are mild when it comes to corruption, but most are aggressively greedy. The longer they stay in power, the longer they are in the front row of the feeding trough. That is why a government like the ANC in South Africa has one goal and that is to stay in power for ever. In order for us to understand the reasoning and rationale behind Apartheid it is necessary to briefly look at the role of Government. We as human beings want to live and survive. We want to pass on our genes into the future and in this short period of being here on earth, we want to be happy.

Part of being happy is to have a house, furniture, a television, or whatever makes us happy, basically to own property. This is called the right to life and the pursuit of happiness through the ownership of property. Problem comes in when someone wants to take your life away, take your property away or interfere in anyway with your pursuit of happiness. Such a person is then initiating force. He is stealing from us, physically attacking us, defrauding us, etc and therefore threatening our survival and our pursuit of happiness which are the most fundamental rights an individual can have. When you are a strong burly bloke, you can easily defend yourself against such a person and your retaliatory force will be just. You did not initiate the force, but protected your right to life and happiness. But what if the assailant has weapons, or there are more than one ? What if you are a child, a frail woman, an elderly person or mentally handicapped ? How do you then protect yourself against the initiation of force ? And that dear people is why we have a government. The only job of any government is to protect our individual rights. The role of any government is to protect our right to life and our pursuit of happiness from those who wants to take it away from us. The way government does it is to have an army to protect us from those outside of our country who are or might be attacking us and threaten our survival and pursuit of happiness and to have a police force to protect us from those inside our country who wants to take our individual rights away.

The government therefore needs to uphold the laws that the citizens feel are rightful and just to protect them from the initiation of force and what threatens their individual rights. First as a warning to those intending on taking away those individual rights and also to punish those who break these laws. One thing a government should never do is to initiate force against its citizens. This becomes a dicey topic, because extorting taxes is a form of initiation of force. A government can actually totally fund all its expenditures through other moral means such as setting up trust funds with all the money and property it owns, donations and people paying for services such as passports, toll roads, vehicle registration, etc. Companies who want to transport their goods through harbours, by rail or road, etc, should pay for using this infrastructure. Taxes therefore become obsolete. There is not a single government department that cannot fully pay for itself. Nevertheless, I am digressing. The National Party government in 1948 were faced with all these dilemmas when they came to power. Their primary task as a government was to protect all the citizens of South Africa. In the previous instalments of this series I tried to explain the background to this dilemma, considering the vast diversity of South Africa's people, their cultures, their religions, their languages and their histories. I explained how blacks from literally hundreds of smaller tribes were fighting against each other for hundreds of years before the whites came to South Africa, often wiping each other out completely.

Credo Mutwa writes in his book "My People" (1969), chapter eleven, page 244 :

"One of the High Laws of the Bantu is the law of revenge. The result of this law is that there are blood-feuds going on all over Africa which show no sign of dying out. Some of these have already been going on for generations. The Zulus have been feuding with the Basutus (Sothos), and also with the Shanganes of Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique), for more than a century. The feud between the Baluba and some of its neighbouring tribes has been going on for nearly six hundred years, while the feud between the Masai and the Wakambi in Kenya has now entered its tenth century. The Bahutu (Hutus) and the Wa-Tu-Tutsi (Tutsis) have been at each other's throats for as long, and as recently as 1963 the newspapers reported that this senseless feud had accounted for another 30,000 Wa-Tu-Tutsi lives".

Note how Credo Mutwa writes about the animosity between the Hutus and the Tutsis of Rwanda in 1969, referring to a relatively small massacre of 30,000 Tutsis in 1963. It culminated in full blown genocide of between 800,000 and 1,2 million Tutsis in 1994. This is exactly the chaos Apartheid tried to prevent. The South African situation was unique. It was a major challenge and it had to be solved fairly. The NP had to find a compromise that everyone could live with and be happy with. The White NP government intimately knew the blacks of South Africa and the blacks of Africa in general. They knew about Shaka's Defecane that was worse than the Rwanda genocide, they knew about all the inter cultural and inter tribal differences of the blacks of South Africa. They knew about the massacres of whites during the Xhosa wars, the massacre of whites at Bloukrans, the Battle of Blood River and countless more.

The only way to keep the peace, protect all the citizens of South Africa and to secure the individual rights of all the people of South Africa was to separate them, let them develop at their own pace, give them autonomy the right to rule themselves, draw up their own laws and enforce those laws with their own armies and police forces. The official government policy was called "Seperate Development". The Media called it, "Apartheid". Proposed in 1973 accepted and enforced in 1976, The United Nations General Assembly declared Apartheid a crime against humanity without offering an alternative to South Africa's situation. The question is thus open. Considering the background that I have sketched so far in this series, what would you have done if you were in charge of South Africa at the time, faced with the same challenges ? What would your solution have been ? The worst that Apartheid critics can dig up, the worst "Massacre" they can ever refer to, is the Sharpeville shootings in 1960 when 69 blacks died.

Compare that to Rwanda 1994; Rwanda is exactly what Apartheid tried to prevent. It does not matter what people says about Apartheid today, on the watch of the National Party, no Rwanda style massacre ever occurred on South African soil. More than 3000 white farmers were not killed by black savages under Apartheid, reported rapes of 50,000 per year never happened under Apartheid. Contrary to what most blacks and/or liberal whites would like to think about what whites supposedly did to blacks under Apartheid. There are no mass graves, there is not a single concentration camp, and there are certainly no gas chambers where whites tried to exterminate blacks. Quite the contrary. White South Africans built the biggest hospital in the world, Baragwanath (today called the Chris Hani Barragwanath hospital) for blacks with white expertise and white taxpayer's money - 3200 beds and 6760 staff members. For that, and many other altruistic and charitable endeavours, whites of South Africa were and still are made out as the evil skunks of the world.

Looks great ! 

[Part 6 - Other Rationales For Apartheid]

Part 6 - Other Rationales For Apartheid

By Mike Smith

So far I have only scratched the surface and told the reader about the more common practices and customs of blacks that whites know about and find abominable such as, Lobola (buying wives with cows), the initiation rituals of boys and girls, witchcraft, superstition, muti-murders, raping babies to cure AIDS, etc. There are so many more rationales for Apartheid that one can actually write a book about them. And indeed someone has written a book about it, several books actually. His name is Credo Mutwa and the name of the book is "My People-The writings of a Zulu witch-doctor". (1969) ISBN 014003210X. The book is extremely rare and few people know about it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vusamazulu_Credo_Mutwa  It is a fascinating book, giving you insight into the various traditions of black South Africans of various tribes, their beliefs, their superstitions, their customs and their mindset.

Credo is the most respected Sangoma and Sunusi in the whole of South Africa. He is a traditional healer, a black historian and an authority on traditional customs and beliefs of the black tribes of Africa. If one has to compare him to Christianity, then Credo Mutwa would be the pope of traditional healers. He mentions several practices that is just too ghastly for the pious whites of South Africa to accept. One of the things he describes is the black law of infanticide when twins are born. This practice is still carried on today. Think about it, look around you, how many black twins have you seen in South Africa ?

"The law requires that if a woman gives birth to twins, one must be destroyed by having a round pebble pushed down its throat. But in the case of triplets, one must die and two must live" - "My People", Chapter 10, Pg. 218. So the few "twins" we see amongst blacks were actually triplets of which one was killed.

Blacks also killed their own wounded soldiers - "The wound would fester and sooner or later the patient would die. Even small gaping wounds spelt a write-off of the patient; large Panga slashes were regarded as fatal at the outset and warriors thus wounded were given a mercy death. Many battle axes were furnished with special 'dispatchers' for this purpose." - "My people" Chapter 11, pg. 234.

I will conclude with a topic that very few people wish to address and prefer to ignore, but if we are going to be honest about blacks and why we had Apartheid, then we need to mention the facts that blacks are untidy, and well, they smell funny. One just has to look at how blacks live. From ancient times until today, it does not matter where in the world one goes, a black area looks like a pig sty. I have seen this in Trinidad and Tobago, in Haiti, in Jamaica in the Bahamas and everywhere I went in Africa. I have seen this from black areas in European cities to ghettos in the USA. Blacks just cannot keep their environment clean and tidy. Everything is disorderly, chaotic and dirty, rubbish lying all over the place.

Another phenomenon that one sees in townships of South Africa, is that Blacks do not plant grass, flowers or trees amongst their tin shacks. This is amazingly odd. Firstly, because blacks work as gardeners or bricklayers for whites. So the ability to build is there, the ability to keep lawn and a garden is there. Why is it that blacks never do in their own areas what they do when they are working for whites ? Maybe their environments are reflections of how they keep their bodies orderly and tidy as well. This is how blacks are. They are actors. They can even mimic a White accent, white behaviour or intelligence and appear almost the same as whites. Many whites fall for this and indeed believe that blacks are the same as whites, but it is when one gets to know blacks up close and personal that one sees through this veil and behind the mask.

Blacks can bullsh!t a lot, especially when they work for whites. Then they know they have to put their best foot forward or lose the job. That is when they wash, dress respectably and behave almost white. In the workplace, blacks who are utterly incompetent will fake competence, bullsh!t their way through every day, steal other's work, all an act to hide their incompetence and when they are caught out, they just change jobs and repeat the process. That is when one realises that the so called intelligent words coming out of the mouths or pens of Martin Luther King or Barack Obama are all stolen. All non original thought and written by speech writers or whispered in their ears by advisors. But something blacks find extremely difficult to hide is their body odour. Blacks smell. Everyone knows this. You go to Poland, you go to Japan and you ask anybody about blacks, you will hear they say, "blacks smell". Maybe there is a biological reason for it, but I am not exactly keen on finding out. All I know is what my nose tells me and that is that Blacks smell really bad and that I cannot live with that.

But let me quote what Credo Mutwa says in his book, "My people", (1969) chapter ten - "Xhosa women also prepare mysterious potions to secure their husbands to them, so that they will not be forsaken. This potion is prepared as follows : The woman refrains from taking a bath for several days, and then rubs the body dirt off her skin in little rolls. To this she adds the hair she has shaved off her private parts. Then follows ground Bangalala root which, when mixed with milk, is a violent aphrodisiac. The recipe may also include the powdered dry petals of a sunflower, a little spittle, and a piece of sandlewood. The whole concoction is then heated in a bowl until red hot and thus reduced to ashes. These ashes are then stirred into the milk of a nanny goat which had a deformed kid, until a thick putty is formed. This is then rolled into little balls or pills, which are added one at a time to the husband's food." - "My People", Chapter ten, pg. 213.

It is clear that the religions, cultures, customs and the behaviour of blacks are just too different than that of white people. These cultures are worlds apart and totally incompatible with each other. Whites and blacks will never get along in South Africa. Anybody who believes such a pipe dream as a multicultural "Rainbow Nation", does not know black culture or white culture. Such a person would only be fooling himself through masturbating his own delusional, liberal, feel-good mindset. No, I am sorry to disappoint such people, but blacks and whites are NOT the same. The reality of South Africa is so that few options actually exists. Either one of the two, black or white, totally wipes out the other or they separate completely. Not partial separation as under Apartheid, total separation. The reasons for Apartheid are still as valid today as they were 100 years or 50 years ago. Whites can never apologise for Apartheid, because whites cannot help for the inferior cultures, customs and behaviour of blacks. Separation and separate development of all the tribes is and was the most humane and fairest solution for all the complex groups of South Africa.

[Heavily-Armed Gang Posing As Cops]

Heavily-Armed Gang Posing As Cops

Johannesburg - A gang posing as police officers has been targeting the East Rand and Johannesburg's northern suburbs, Gauteng police said on Wednesday. "This gang is carrying high calibre weapons," said acting provincial police commissioner, Major General Pumza Gela. The areas being targeted were Benoni, Germiston, the N17, Beyers Naude Drive, and the N14 near Dieplsoot. In the past seven days, five cases were reported and the modus operandi was similar in each case. He said about three to five people would be in an unmarked car, mostly white Golfs, hijacking and robbing people after hours when it was not safe to stop. Some of the criminals were also using blue lights.

Gela urged residents not to stop if they were indicated to do so by people in an unmarked vehicle using blue lights. "Don't stop. Look for the safest place like a garage or a police station. "If it's a law-abiding officer, then he will follow you." Motorists who are pulled over by someone claiming to be an officer in an unmarked car should demand their credentials. Gela said the challenge for police was that many hijackings and robberies were reported late, in some cases a day later. "At times there are gaps of about two hours in between ... the vehicle could be outside the province by then." If cases were reported immediately, police officers would be dispatched to the scene straight away, he said. He did not rule out the possibility that some members of the gang could be policemen. "It cannot be excluded that police members are conniving with [these] criminals."

Gun control

In the past 18 months, 600 police officers were arrested for crimes in Gauteng. "There may be corrupt members in our ranks but it's not all of us. It's a drop in the ocean." He said 99% of police officers were good. The SA Police Service was trying to improve its strategy and had a system in place, he said. About 850 police officers deployed in Gauteng had been asked to look out for suspicious vehicles in the areas they patrolled. He urged people to report the registration plates of suspicious vehicles. Gela said police management were taking back police uniforms not in use to prevent them from falling into the wrong hands. A new system had been put in place with regard to the issuing of state firearms. In all police stations, two people were appointed to watch and issue firearms to prevent them "slipping out easily", Gela said.

http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Heavily-armed-gang-posing-as-cops-20120516  

Needless to say, when your country reaches this stage, you`re in big trouble