Messages

[Part 18 – Hypocrisy At The United Nations]

Part 18 – Hypocrisy At The United Nations

By Mike Smith

In an excellent article Citizen Kane, occasional contributor to the South Africa Sucks blog gave an accurate account of who and what the United Nations Organization actually is, namely a communist front. I will therefore not duplicate what he mentions in his article, but simply underline it. What I want to highlight in this article is the hypocrisy of nations uttered at this communist platform against South Africa and how South Africa was turned into "A skunk amongst Nations" as Les De Villiers mentions in his book by the same name. Les de Villiers who has a masters degree in linguistics was a journalist and diplomat in Canada and headed the South African Information Services in the USA for five years. What irked him the most was the double standards of nations represented at the UN general assembly and the hypocrisy with which they slagged off South Africa and its human rights situation. It was in 1960 that the Afrikaans Newspaper, "Die Burger" first took stock of South Africa's position in the world and called it, "Die Muishond van die wêreld" (The skunk of the world). It was Cicero who said, "When you have no basis for an argument, abuse the plaintiff". Judging from how SA was treated at the UN from 1946 to 1994 it is clear that the UN had many students of Cicero. At the end of WW2 Jan Smuts led the SA delegation at the San Francisco Conference where the UN was found. Like I have mentioned before, Smuts was one of the main writers of the UN charter. He also served as Chairman of the General Assembly. Smuts was well respected as a statesman during both war and peace. In Article 2, paragraph 7 of the UN Charter it is stated clearly that the UN shall not intervene in matters which were essentially within the jurisdiction of any member state. Great was Smut's surprise when at the very first UN General Assembly in 1946, India insisted that the condition of Indians in South Africa be discussed. This is the same India who has a caste system of discriminating against their own people and who have major issues with Pakistan over Kashmir. Smuts found himself up against a stonewall of prejudice at the very organization he helped to create. At first there was only 51 states and from Africa only four, South Africa, Liberia, Ethiopia and Egypt.

After WW2 Africa was still mainly colonial, but during the fifties and sixties, Britain, France, Portugal and Belgium left Africa and the Communists took over almost all of their former colonies. Today there are 53 African states out of 192 nations represented at the UN and they all have the same vote as western countries. Out of the world's 195 countries only three are today not members namely, Kosovo, Taiwan and The Vatican City. Basically the UN is run by the Africans. Even Henry Kissinger admitted it, because the blacks only have to open their mouths with a loud tribal howl and an automatic two-thirds majority occurs, thanks to the support from the Communists and the Asian bloc. With this two-thirds majority, the African states rammed through dozens of condemnatory resolutions against Apartheid and South Africa and got Apartheid declared as a "Crime against humanity" in1976. Up until today, the UN General Assembly has not made any findings, nor have apartheid-related trials for crimes against humanity ever been conducted. In 1971 Communist China was welcomed as a member of both the General Assembly and the Security Council at the expense of Taiwan (Nationalist China). Communist China with a record of killing 25 million of its own citizens and till this day guilty of gross human rights abuses with a string of gulag death camps, forced abortions and killing 3000 pro democracy demonstrators at Tiananmen Square, is one of the permanent members of the UN Security Council. In 1972 they joined the pharisaical choir to get South Africa expelled from the UN.

If Apartheid and South Africa did not exist, they would have invented some other "Whipping boy", because how else could they have ignored what was going on in Ireland, Vietnam, Nigeria, etc ? During these days at the UN it used to become customary for the African nations to stage mass walkouts every time a South African delegate mounted the podium. This is a testimony to the tolerance blacks have to viewpoints differing to their own. Their argument was that blacks in South Africa led a "subhuman existence". But then, in 1961, the then foreign minister of South Africa, Eric Louw presented a factual comparison of the living conditions of blacks in South Africa compared to other African states. He proved that Blacks in SA had a higher per capita income, better educational opportunities, far superior medical and social services and altogether a higher standard of living than anywhere in Africa.  How did the blacks respond to the truth ? The Black African states engineered a motion of censure against him (first of its kind) and his speech was struck from the record. Even "The Washington Post", who regularly criticized South Africa, noted : "Nothing that South Africa has done and nothing that its representatives said, justified the mob-like censure which the United Nations visited upon that country and its Foreign Minister, Mr Eric Louw." In 1973, The Mauritian ambassador, Radla Kirshna Ramphul piped up and said that South Africa could not be heard in the General Assembly until her credentials were approved and it became impossible for South Africa to fully participate in the UN. The next year, 1974, Bouteflika of Algeria took the presidential chair of the UN. Pik Botha, Foreign minister of South Africa who led a multiracial delegation mounted the rostrum to make a brief statement. Bouteflika's moustache twitched in disdain and he refused to recognize the presence of Botha. Botha responded by not congratulating him on his election to the presidency. It was clear, South Africa had no friends at the UN.

In 1974 came the call to have SA expelled from the UN. They voted 93 to 23 (14 abstaining) that SA was not fit for membership. "Voor in die koor" (in the front of the choir) was the Ugandan Foreign minister Elizabeth Bagaya, representing a country run by a cannibalistic dictator Idi Amin who became synonomous with oppression of blacks (the Lango and Acholi people) and the indiscriminate execution of dissidents. Between 100,000 and 500,000 people were brutally murdered in Uganda at the time. She hardly batted an eyelid in listing the alleged "Crimes" of South Africa. In that very same assembly, sat the Indians who gave Smuts such a hard time in 1946, seemingly unaware that Amin expelled all the Indians from Uganda. Nobody had the guts to object to this macabre performance. That nobody burst out laughing is beyond me. When India, Pakistan and Ceylon(Sri Lanka) were taking on Jan Smuts over their brethren in SA, he offered to pay for their repatriation to their home countries. A small group from SA took him on on his offer as an advance party, but soon returned telling their fellow Indians in SA to stay where they were, because conditions in their motherland were unbearable. Indians in South Africa at the time enjoyed a per capita income six times higher than that in India and towards the end of Apartheid on par with and sometimes higher than that of whites. These same Indians and the rest of the world who were slagging South Africa off about Apartheid at the UN seemed to be unconcerned about the 900,000 refugees who were fleeing religious persecution in India and Pakistan during the 1960's. They cared little for the 500,000 Indians thrown out of Burma, tens of thousands expelled from Uganda, or the thousands victimized in Kenya and Tanzania. Ten years before that Indonesia slaughtered tens of thousand of women, men and children of Chinese background, Many African countries have done worse, yet China and Russia, operators of their own Gulag Archipelagos voted to expel South Africa. Only the United States, Britain and France prevented the expulsion of South Africa in 1974, mainly because they realized that similarly Arab countries could gang up against Israel and expel the Jewish state. But the General assembly eventually had the final word, before the year was out they voted 91 to 22 (19 abstentions) to suspend SA from its deliberations. The Arabs supported the Africans in exchange to hold back on the Palestine issue. Barely days after the suspension of SA, the terrorist leader of the PLO, Yassar Arafat rocked up at the UN. He was welcomed by the Africans and the Arabs as a hero and Israel's freedom to speak at the UN was restricted.

In 1967 the UN Human Rights Commission decided to establish a special unit to investigate "allegations" of cruelty against prisoners in SA jails, while in Saudi Arabia according to the Anti-Slavery Society's report to the UN, slaves were still sold. The Society estimated that King Feisal and wealthy members held thousands of slaves. Gerald L'Ange of the "Johannesburg Star" was their when the resolution was adopted to throw SA out of the UN, but he said the Commission was thrown into discord when they had to deal with complaints of gross violations in eight countries. These complaints included mass tribal killings in Burundi, detention of 55,000 political prisoners in Indonesia, torture of hundreds of dissidents in Brazil, suppression of political rights in Iran, forged marriages in Tanzania, interrogation by torture of thirty people by the British Army in Northern Ireland and discrimination against Indians in Gyana. L'Ange pointed out that these eight cases were drawn from a list of 7,000 violations. When a proposal to investigate these cases more closely was made, it met stiff opposition from the Soviets, who obviously had a lot to fear about the treatment of their prisoners in the Gulags. In the same Burundi, who was mouthing off about racism in South Africa, the Tutsis were killing off thousand of Hutus. The retaliation in 1994 would lead to a genocide that the UN did not, could not and did not want to stop. The killings in the Sudan mounted to 100,000 a year. The Biafran war in Nigeria lasted 30 months and 2 million were killed and 5 million ended up in refugee camps. What did the UN do ? The UN chose to be observers. But when eleven rioting black mine workers were shot at a mine in Carletonville, South Africa, Kurt Waldheim immediately launched a full enquiry into it. But it was not only the Africa countries who were voting against South Africa. Prior to 1974 Portugal was always a friend of SA, but suddenly leftist post coup Mario Soares who capitulated Guinea Bissau and Mozambique to Communist forces rose in the General assembly and fiercely attacked South Africa in his "Volte-Face" (total change) speech under great applause of the Africans. At that stage, South Africa was handing blacks self rule (over a long term peaceful period) to full Black independence under democratic principles. Mozambique was plunged into a civil war that killed almost a million people and displaced 5 million.

At the General assembly of 1962 the Soviet Foreign minister, Gromyko, speaking from a home base littered with labour camps and harsh prisons, described South Africa as, "The veritable private domain of slave owners". The soviet minister's speech just happened about the same time of the erecting of the Berlin Wall, that trapped the East Germans under a Communist yoke, and South Africa giving full freedom and independence to the Xhosas in Transkei. In true Orwelian New-speak, freedom has become slavery and peace has become war. Israel for many years supported many of the black states and even donated money to the Organisation for Africa Unity (OAU). Then came the Yom Kippur War against the Arabs and overnight all of Black Africa severed ties with Israel. Her only real friends proved to be the USA, the Netherlands, Portugal and South Africa. For Israel it was a rude awakening. Yosef Lapide, who wrote for the Tel Aviv newspaper "Ma'Ariv" had this to say about Black African states : "Well, the so called liberated African states are, with a few exceptions, a bad joke and an insult to human dignity. They are run by a bunch of corrupt rulers, some of whom, Like Idi Amin of Uganda, are mad according to all the rules of psychiatry. I feel unburdened when I say this; I wanted to say this all these years, and all these years I had the feeling that we fool the public when, for reasons of diplomacy, we do not tell them that the majority of black African states are one nauseating mess". Lapide found that "The lowliest of Negroes in South Africa has more civil rights than the greatest Soviet author; The most oppressed negro in South Africa has more to eat than millions of Africans in "Liberated" countries." He further added that "The most rabid White extremist in South Africa will not treat Negroes in the way Negroes treated - and still treat - Whites in the Congo, in Uganda and in other African states." Lapide goes further, "The people advocating "progress", who were so worried about the rights of the majority in South Africa, have never raised their voices for the majority in Hungary or in Cuba, in Red China or in Egypt." "In half a dozen states - including Ethiopia - thousands of persons die every day of hunger, while the rulers travel by Cadillac and steal food that is being sent to aid their subjects." "Only in the sick minds of "progressives" do the babies die of starvation with a smile on their lips, because the ruler who starves them to death has a black skin." "For the life of me, if I must choose between friendship with Black Africa, as it is today, and friendship with a White state that is orderly and successful, and contains a blossoming Jewish community, then I prefer South Africa. The only pity is that we waited until the Blacks threw us out." – end of quote. Yes, such was the disillusionment of Israel.

However, no mention of the UN attack on SA would be complete without mentioning the Nordic Countries who also stepped to the front of this holy Black crusade against South Africa. The Whites in the South African government thought that they had an opportunity to present some facts to reasonable white people. How wrong they were. The South African government extended an invitation to the Nordic countries to visit South Africa at a time convenient to them, with every facility to go where they pleased and to meet whomever they wished. It was declined rather curtly. The African Nations were obviously not the only ones who lived in fear of hard facts about the South African situation. In 1973 Black African terrorist gathered in Oslo, Norway under UN auspices to plan strategy. A year later the "Special Committee on Apartheid" went on an expensive junket to publicize its efforts and to meet with anti-apartheid elements in churches, schools, universities and labour unions throughout Europe. Nevertheless, the Latin American countries, dubbed the African countries in the UN the "Aplandora" (the Steamroller). The UN is only a platform for black communist propaganda. In 1974 West Germany also applied for admission to the UN. She soon found out who exactly runs the show at the UN. West Germany was told to toughen her stance against South Africa if it was serious about being allowed in on the first vote. Chancellor Willy Brand obliged in his maiden address of the UN general assembly. He promised to support the UN resolutions aimed at getting rid of "The anachronistic remnants of Colonialism". In countries like Australia, New Zealand and Canada it became fashionable for politicians to slag South Africa off just so they could win votes. At the UN every man and his dog was against us. We have to remember these lessons learned in those days when we are serious about having a country of our own one day. The UN will never allow a strong independent nation state to exist, let alone a white one, despite what the Charter says. Let us look at the Katanga episode as a Case study in point. The story is told in the book, "The Fearful Master : A Second Look at the United Nations" by Edward Griffin.

When The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) received independence from Belgium on 30 June 1960 Patrice Lumumba, a Gin drinking, dagga-smoking piece of communist scum became the prime minister and he told the King of Belgium at the official handover, "Nous ne sommes plus vos singes (We are no longer your monkeys)". Six days later black soldiers mutinied against their white officers and attacked numerous European targets. Armed bands of mutineers roamed the capital looting and terrorizing the white population, raping and killing as far as they went. This caused the flight of thousands of European refugees to Brazzaville and Stanleyville. Belgian troops had to intervene. Another six days later on 11 July 1960, with the support of Belgian business interests and over 6000 Belgian troops, the province of Katanga in the southeast declared independence as the State of Katanga under the leadership of Moise Tshombe. Tshombe was an educated accountant and successful businessman. He was pro-Western, pro Capitalist and a Christian and hated Communism. Now comes the interesting part. Tshombe asked the Americans for help to restrain the communist forces. The communist Lumumba, went crying at the UN and the UN took his side, passed a resolution (143) with the support of America and Russia, and the UN troops were sent in to chase out all the Belgian and mercenary troops and to use force to prevent the secession of Katanga. Katanga was loaded with minerals and the richest part of the DRC. Within a few weeks, thousands of UN troops arrived in the DRC. Belgium pulled its troops back and left the DRC to the mercy of the communist Lumumba and the UN troops. The UN troops did almost nothing to stop the carnage against whites and the people of Katanga. They did not bring peace or control, they mostly stood by and watched as the country was being destroyed and how it came more and more under Communist control. Tshombe restored calm and peace in Katanga. His foreign affairs minister said they wanted Katanga to be a bastion of Anti-communism in Africa. Tshombe himself said that he abhors Communism and that he would never change.

It infuriated the UN Security council so much that shortly afterwards they attacked Katanga. Initially the UN had a few successes, but then the Katanga forces hit back and drove the UN back. Clearly frustrated the UN used mercenaries to start a terror campaign against Katanga civilians. Murder, arson, torture, rape and plunder was used to subdue the Katangese. 90% of the houses destroyed by the UN were civilian buildings. Children and adults were indiscriminately bayoneted and entire hospitals destroyed. Amazingly, Katanga held out two years against the UN barbarians and prevented the capitulation of their country to Communists. The UN troops regrouped and were kitted out with new equipment, airplanes, helicopters. American dollars paid for everything and all the military hardware were American. 29 December 1962, the UN launched a second assault on the freedom and independence loving country of Katanga. A month later as the UN invasion reached its peak, Moise Tshombe told his brave soldiers, "Men, in the last two and a half years you fought three times like heroes against the enemy, but now the enemy masses are just too much. Shortly after that the last flame of hope, freedom and independence died in the Congo. And so we can mention many instances in Cuba, Nicaragua, Hungary, Angola, Mozambique, Namibia and Rhodesia where the UN handed power over to communist regimes. In the 65 years of existence of the UN, it has never once acted against the communists. Terrorist organisations like SWAPO were given observer status in the UN even before they became the government of Namibia. Not only that, SWAPO, the ANC, ZANU-PF and many other terrorist organisations are directly sponsored by the UN. South Africa was the last domino to fall, before the rest of the West would be tackled directly. "Day X", the day of a one world totalitarian government is fast approaching. When we were under a total onslaught in South Africa, friends were few. Today many who were against Apartheid are laughing and dancing on the graves of 3000+ white farmers, they are ignoring our plight for help all over the world, but those same people should realize that their day will come, when they will feel how it feels like to lose your country, being powerless and watching helplessly how your country is being destroyed.

Anybody who has dreams of an independent white homeland in Africa, should bear in mind that the UN had a full scale Battle-plan of ground, air and sea invasions worked out to attack White South Africa. The "Chicago Tribune" wrote on 24th of July 1965 that a 170 page Battle Plan with the title, " Apartheid and United Nations Collective measures" was compiled by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. It detailed a ground invasion with 93,000 troops with air and sea support after which the country would be handed over to a Black government and be under an international trustee control. It would be a 30 day Blitzkrieg and would cost US$ 94,537 000. They even worked out the casualties on both sides and the amount of wounded. On the hand of this evidence it is clear that the United Nations is not, nor has ever been a friend of Whites in South Africa and in the event of a future racial war or war for independence we will not only be up against the Blacks, but we will have to reckon with the UN supporting them as well.

[Pontifex Cambeul.]

I wish you all the best in South Africa, from what I hear the farm murders are becoming an epidemic and of course the outside world completely ignores it

Thanks; much appreciated. The farm murders are reaching the outside world in the last year or so, but the world wont react.

What really makes me sick is Eastern European communists that think Mandela was a hero, they do not understand that African communism and it's bastard offspring American communism (although not nearly as far along, it is in the same vein) is of a completely different nature than the old Soviet bloc or Yugoslav style communism. African communism is blatantly kill whitey

American communism is picking up speed at an alarming rate - I am amazed how asleep the Whites are over there !

I sincerely hope White South Africa survives

Oh we will, or die in the process - make no mistake about that. South Africa is not zimudwe; we have a different breed of Whites here - it`s always darkest before the dawn !

Like I said before, all of the information is contained here - in much more detail - in this topic. I am just a little more blunt at getting the same message across. Pontifex Cambeul.

A good book to read is "Verraad teen Suid Afrika" (Conspiracy Against South Africa) - this is where most of the info comes from. This book was a real eye opener to me when I read it some 17 years ago - geez, I`m getting old.

[Part 17 – The Banking Conspiracy]

Part 17 – The Banking Conspiracy

By Mike Smith

I was going to jump to the UN and show how SA became a skunk amongst Nations, but in the light of new evidence in the form of admission and confirmation from none other than ex Foreign minister Roelof Frederik (Pik) Botha about the role of international banks ganging up against South Africa during the National Party government, I thought it appropriate to explain in more detail how huge international banks manipulate countries. I have also received some requests to explain the methods used by bankers. Kindly note that I am not anti Capitalism in exposing these bankers. Quite the contrary, I am in full favour of laissez faire capitalism, but one has to distinguish between genuine free market capitalism and that of manipulative high finance Mega-banking monopolies.

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
(James Paul Warburg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Warburg Appearing before the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on 7th February 1950. He was an international banker, a member of the CFR and financial advisor to F.D. Roosevelt)

I must admit that when I started this series, I knew I would sooner or later end up at a point where I had to address the influence of powerful international think tanks such as the RIIA, the CFR and the Trilateral Commission in bringing down South Africa and handing it over to a black Marxist terrorist regime. I knew the time would come that I would have to address the role of Mega Bankers and how they financed the communist revolution in South Africa. I knew the time would come where I would be slammed with the epithet of "Conspiracy Theorist". I thought hard about how to address this issue. It is like being labeled a "Racist" when you speak the truth. In this case it is the same. There is however only one way to counter the lies and propaganda of these communists and that is with hard facts and the truth.
So along came Mr. Pik Botha who was the minister for foreign affairs as well as Information during the last years of Apartheid (1977-1994) and affirms everything I and so many other writers have discovered. Last Sunday (6th of June 2010) he wrote an article in Rapport, the Afrikaans Sunday paper, titled "Die land wás op pad na ekonomiese verwoesting" (The country wás on its way to economic ruin). In this article he affirms how the Chase Manhattan Bank of David Rockefeller wanted to call in all loans to the SA government. He further affirms his year's long friendship with Dr Henry Kissinger, that still continues to this day, and how he asked Kissinger to intervene with the Bank. Kissinger phoned him back 04h00 in the morning and told him that it was too late, there is nothing he could do and in fact the other banks were going to do the same thing. They were going to overnight ruin the economy of South Africa. It was only due to a rescue package from a Swiss Banker called Dr. Fritz Leutwiler that saved the country. Every person who has done an in-depth study of how Apartheid was brought down comes to the same conclusions, the same discoveries, the same organizations, the same banks and the same names.

The internationally acclaimed journalist Aida Parker back in the Seventies published a series of articles in "The Citizen" called, "Secret War on South Africa". This was a revolutionary move on her side. These well researched articles were so hot that she was forced to resign shortly after that and start her own edition called "The Aida Parker Newsletter". She came to exactly the same conclusions about the CFR, the RIIA, the TC and gigantic oil, industrial and banking concerns as well as international media corporation who wants to introduce "a world government or "Super state". The German author Klaus Vaqué in his book "Verrat an Südafrika" dedicates an entire chapter (Ch. 5) to the conspiracy of the Bankers against South Africa. Eustace Mullins in his book Secrets of the Federal Reserve (1952) tells the story of a few New York bankers who met on the evening of 22 November 1910 at the Hoboken train station, New Jersey. They were to board the train and their destination was the exclusive Jekyl Island Hunt Club on Jekyl Island, Georgia that belonged to the J.P. Morgan bankers. This group of bankers are known as the "Aldrich group" after Republican senator Nelson Aldrich who would lead the commission. With him was three bankers, Frank Vanderlip of the then mightiest bank, "National City Bank of NY", to whom the banking house of Kuhn, Loeb and Company also belonged. The other two were Henry P. Davidson of J.P. Morgan Company and Charles D. Norton, the president of "First National Bank of New York". One other person who was part of this group was Paul Moritz Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb and Company. He was the principal representative of the European banking family, The Rothschilds. These men left for Jekyl Island, not to go and hunt, but to work out a law that would be treason to America and would give these bankers control over the money of the USA. This law is called "The Federal Reserve act" of 1913. They waited until 23 December 1913 when most congress representatives would already be on Christmas holiday before they passed this bill (signed by Woodrow Wilson) through congress and got it approved. On this day ended the American constitution and the freedom of Americans were handed over to a handful of bankers.

How the Bankers make money out of War
Every government spends more money than they get in taxes. They use this for big projects such as dams, roads or simply for free handouts. This money is then borrowed from these big banks and the taxpayers pay the money and interest back. It is thus in the interest of these bankers to drive up the debt of a country, because more debt means more interest. Nothing drives a country deeper in debt than a war. So if the banks want to make money, they just support the enemies of the state to initiate war, whereupon the state then borrows money from the bankers to fight this war. It is quite common for these bankers to finance both sides of the war. How many people dies in these conflicts means nothing to them. The first harvest for these bankers came three years after passing the Federal Reserve Act at the end of the First World War, and because it worked so well, they built in the start of another World War into the Treaty of Versailles. The Vietnam War could have been won within months if the generals were allowed to do their job. Ten years and 58,156 dead American soldiers later the only ones who won were the bankers. Today many people believe that Communism is a movement of suppressed masses who are fighting against the exploitation from their employers. Nothing is further from the truth. Most people know that the Bolshevik revolution in Russia came in (Oct) November 1917, but few knows that the Tsar already abdicated in March, seven months before that. At that time there was an interim, provisional government run by prince Lvov, moulded on the American model. Unfortunately Alexander Kerensky a Socialist revolutionary succeeded prince Lvov. He then lifted a ban on all communists that were previously banned under the Tsar and so allowed 250,000 communist revolutionaries to re-enter the country.

When the Tsar abdicated, Lenin and Trotsky were in exile in Switzerland and the US respectively. At that time the Bolsheviks were no real power in Russia. Lenin was sent all across Europe in his sealed train and had about $5-6 million of gold with him. It was arranged by the German High Command, Max Warburg and Alexander Helphand. The father-in-law of Max Warburg's brother, Felix, namely Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb & Co also helped finance the Bolshevik Revolution. According to the newspaper "Journal American" of 3 February 1949, Jacob Schiff donated $20 million dollars to the Bolsheviks. Mr. Bakhmetiev, the last Russian Imperial ambassador in the USA said that the Bolsheviks transferred more than 600 million rubles to Kuhn Loeb & Co between the years of 1918-1922. As we can see, the revolution never comes from the oppressed masses it comes from the top down or from the outside in. It is financed from high power and finance institutions. No war just breaks out spontaneously, it is carefully orchestrated. Not only did these bankers support the Communist, but they also kept them alive for decades. It is all documented in the work, "Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development", by Dr Anthony Sutton. Everything the Soviets ever had has been acquired from the USA. One can say the Soviet Union was "Made in the USA". It does not matter whether a hundred million people died under Communism and 2 Billion are still enslaved under the Communist yoke today, it was a small price to pay for a future world government. The methods used by these bankers are one of power play. They tell governments to toe the line or they will send the communists. They do this in Thailand, in Greece and they did the same in South Africa. There is a way to defeat these communists and bankers, but more on that in a later edition.

In South Africa these bankers supported the communists, because they knew that when the natives would start getting agitated and started revolting, the White people would try to appease the aggressors, by building them free houses, schools, hospitals, play parks etc. The more the Whites built the more money they needed, so they borrowed it from the international banks. The more the blacks were stirred, the more they demanded and the deeper the country got into debt. At the same time South Africa was fighting a prolonged war on the Angola Namibia border, had sanctions and embargoes against her and was losing a propaganda war at the United Nations and world media. This tactic eventually becomes a vicious spiral until the point where these banks can literally bankrupt a country or a currency as we have seen recently in Greece and with the Euro. Such is the strategy of appeasement and why it will never work. The Beast is insatiable and there is only one way to stop its appetite for destruction; cut off its head. Another technique they use is the one of "Angst". The German word "Angst" is also in the English language, but it is hard to explain. It is something German people are very aware of, because their entire lives are based on it. Nobody is as "ängstlich" as Germans. It is a condition of constant worrying and fear combined with anticipation and finding solutions. It is a technique used very well in the insurance industry. The more they can make you think and worry and fear, the more money they can make out of you. Inventing risks and fears where none exists is their game and we pay them just so we can sleep better at night. One of these fears was the threat of nuclear war with the USSR during the Cold War that never existed. As Henry Kissinger once said, "The world's superpowers will never make war on another; The European Socialists are too dumb to understand that. The Soviet Union is too badly prepared for it..."

This Soviet incompetence and bad preparedness was so well illustrated when a West German teenager named Mathias Rust flew a light aircraft from Finland through a supposedly impregnable air defence system, all along a railway track in Russia and landed on the Red Square in Moscow. It led to the firing of several senior Russian officers including the Defence Minister Sergei Sokolov. Today the Russians maintain that Rust was tracked several times, but they never received an order to shoot him down. Nonsense ! They will never admit that they were outsmarted by a 17 year old boy. Another example was the Russian aeroplane in which the Mozambiquen president Samora Machell died. An independent international investigation pointed out that bad maintenance of the aircraft and the incompetence of the pilots who got lost and did not stick to the flight plan (probably drunk from too much Vodka) were the reasons for the crash over South African territory, but hey, you can always count on a communist to blame everything on big, bad, South Africa, as they did. This technique of using angst is playing on our worst fears and used to great effect by the communist and international banking elite to get us to pay. Even our fear of the dark is being exploited as with ESKOM shutting down and blacking the country out. Eskom proposed a 35% increase in electricity tariffs and got from Nersa (National Energy Regulator) 25% in 2010 on top of a 30% increase in 2009 and a 28% increase in 2008. And the sheep just accepts it all without as much as a bleat, because they are scared of the dark.

Today in the absence of The Soviet Union and Apartheid, new enemies should be created and fears exploited so that the bankers can make money and keep us enslaved. Our fear of suffocation is used to perpetuate lies about "Greenhouse gasses", our fear of drowning is exploited to lie about "melting ice caps" and "global warming". Our fear of terror lurking behind every bush (no pun intended) is used to fight "Al Qaida" for the control of the world Opium trade, our fear of prison or economic ruin is preventing us from speaking the truth and doing something about the killing of our people in South Africa, and so I can go on ... fear, fear, fear. These fears were used in South Africa to great effect. Apart from Black and White fearing being wiped out by another, we feared financial collapse as Pik Botha tried to tell us then and is telling us now. We feared the "Swartgevaar" (Black terror) and the "Rooigevaar" (Red Terror). We feared everything from world isolation to being caught out on camera by Leon Schuster. Nevertheless, fear is an acronym in the English language for "False Evidence Appearing Real". It makes the wolf appear bigger than he actually is. But it is through knowing the truth and exposing their methods that we will fear no more and laugh in the faces of these manipulators, because when we fear something we give it power, and that I refuse to do.

[Part 16 - The Hidden Government]

Part 16 - The Hidden Government

By Mike Smith

One of the basic strategies of war is to find and identify your enemy. If we want to know who the enemies of South Africa were and who constantly crucified us upside down at the United Nations for "The Crime of Apartheid", then we should open a few cans of worms and peek deep down the rabbit-hole. The attack against South Africa was never about the abolishment of Apartheid. It was about the destruction of all western systems of freedom and democracy. They wanted Western Capitalism to be replaced with Scientific Socialism. Most people understand the Communist attack on South Africa, but why the Western World also climbed in and kicked us while we were down is a bitter pill to swallow and difficult to understand. We were a pro Western, Capitalist, Nationalist and Christian country. Why would the Western World attack us ? Most people refuse to believe that the West can be bad. That the West can support Communism. "How can Capitalist leaders cut off their own necks"? they ask. Dr Carrol Quigley wrote a monumental work on the subject called, "Tragedy and Hope" http://www.carrollquigley.net/pdf/Tragedy_and_Hope.pdf  and the entire text can be read online. Quigley was a highly respected professor at Princeton and Harvard Universities. He was the mentor of Bill Clinton who was one of his students. He was also professor of history at Georgetown University and did 25 years of in depth research before he wrote his book. I won't call such a great man a "conspiracy theorist" rather a realist who saw how deep the rabbit hole goes.

Here is an excerpt from his book "Tragedy and Hope" : "There does exist and has existed for a generation, an international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."

About the same time of Rhodes's death in 1902, Smut's ideas of a Union of South Africa (that would destroy the two Boer Republics forever) and Milner surrounding himself with his "Kindergarten", Woodrow Wilson became the president of the USA (1913). He is often credited for his "Fourteen Point plan" and one of the drafters of the League of Nations, the forerunner to the United Nations for which he received the Nobel Prize in 1919.

The "Presidential Advisors"
The presidency of Woodrow Wilson saw the introduction of what is now called "The Presidential Advisers" who are still haunting the White House to this day. It is based on a Boer general namely Jan Smuts' ideas who was a traitor of South Africa, a collaborator of the "One World Government" who served on two British war councils during two world wars as an "Advisor". It started with a character called Edward Mandell House http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_M._House who was an American diplomat, politician, and presidential advisor. He was also a Marxist. Commonly known by the title of Colonel House, although he had no military experience, he had enormous personal influence with U.S. President Woodrow Wilson as his foreign policy advisor until Wilson removed him in 1919. In 1921 he founded the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) whose purpose was to communize and destroy the freedom and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a one-world government. In 1912, House wrote the fictional book "Philip Dru : Administrator" in which he (Dru) was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." In this book, House planned the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic government. In his fictional perverse mind, he leads the democratic western U.S. in a civil war against the plutocratic East, becoming the dictator of America. It is said that after President Wilson read the book "Philip Dru : Administrator" he had a stroke and pined into senility and his second wife became the de facto president of the USA for a while. Every single president of the USA since Wilson has read the book that Mandell House wrote. House also asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank which was also proposed in "The Communist Manifesto". In 1913, both of these proposals became law.

The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this power away from the United States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution, (graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx), was also ratified. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained this domination ever since. More on this organization later. Another famous one of these "Advisors" was Bernard Baruch http://www.knowitall.org/legacy/laureates/baruch%20bernard%20m.html who was of German Jewish origin and advisor to six presidents of the USA over a period of 60 years. Baruch was also known as the "Park bench statesman". He preferred to do his business on a park bench, because he was well aware of bugging devices. During both World Wars he was ever insistent that "One man" become the head of an "Advisory Commission" to the Defense Council of which an investigating commission of Congress in 1919 said, "It served as the secret government of the United states". In 1935 he said something that shows what he had in store for the American people, "had the 1914-1918 war gone on another year our whole population could have emerged in cheap but serviceable uniforms", shoe sizes being the only permissible variation. Mr Baruch in those words revealed his vision of a future America : a faceless mindless mob allowed only to do labour, provided with identity numbers and bread cards - (The Grand design – Douglas Reed). Next up is Harry Lloyd Hopkins, an ulcerous type, intense, jittering with nerves, a chain smoker , black coffee drinker and the closest advisor to Franklin D. Roosevelt. This Roosevelt era is quite significant, because it was at the end of WW2 that Mr. Hopkins and a guy called Alger Hiss gave half of Europe away to Communist at the Yalta conference. This period is probably the darkest days in the history of Europe and it will take generations to recover from the yoke of Communism.

This man Alger Hiss http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alger_Hiss would later be tried for treason, because he was a communist spy. Alger Hiss was also one of the founding members of the United Nations. Over the years we would see many more of these "Advisers", but probably the worst one of them all would be Henry Kissinger. Never before in history have humanity had a larger, more diabolical enemy than Henry Kissinger. After the United Nations were formed, we saw a series of "No-Win Wars" against communism, as Douglas Reed, British author, journalist and playwright calls it in, "The Grand Design" and "The Siege of South Africa". First one of these "No-Win Wars" would be Korea where American, British, Australian and Canadian troops would be sent to fight Communist who was supplied with aircraft, artillery and amour by "Advisor" Mr. Hopkins. South Africa, as part of the UN, also sent troops and pilots. It was all deception. When the successful American commander, MacArthur, wished hotly to pursue a beaten enemy across the Yalu River, President Harry Truman sacked the general. Korea was portioned off like Europe and Germany, and the Communists were left with the Northern half. These "No-Win" wars we saw through from Korea, Vietnam and Namibia, to present day Iraq and Afghanistan, where both sides are supplied with weapons and money from the same sides and profits are made on the corpses of Western White men. But let us look at some of these organizations that would play major roles in attacking us in South Africa and who supported Marxist terrorists with money, training and logistics. Prof. Quigley calls them "An Anglophile Network" founded out of the Round Table of Rhodes from South Africa. Scary to think that this spider web had its origins in South Africa of all places, but it is all true.

Royal Institute for International Affairs (Chatham House)
The RIIA is a British think tank that absorbed Rhodes' Round Table and Milner's "Kindergarten" members. It was founded in 1920 and is part of the British establishment. Chatham House holds meetings at which members, discuss the on goings of world affairs. Over the years many famous statesmen have spoken to distinguished audiences at Chatham House. Recent notable speakers include Jack Straw (British Foreign Secretary) and the Palestinian Prime Minister. Its famous Chatham House Rule, when invoked, ensures confidentiality of all meeting participants. The rule currently reads as follows : "When a meeting or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed".

Council on Foreign Relations
Prof. Carroll Quigley (who was a CFR member himself) writes in his book, "Tragedy & Hope" : "The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established." Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization's intentions : "The most powerful clique in these elitist groups has one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government." And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization's purpose as follows : "The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it." The CFR's activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to destroy the United States of America, and to make the country a part of their global government scheme. It has to be further remembered that there are over 170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the CFR. The leaders of 'Time', 'Newsweek', 'Fortune', 'Business Week', and numerous other publications are CFR members. Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, 'The New York Times', 'The Washington Post', 'The Des Moines Register', and many other important newspapers.

The Trilateral Commision
In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller and Jimmy Carter amongst others. David Rockefeller is the head of the Chase Manhattan Bank (now called JP Morgan Chase). He is the grandson of J.D. Rockefeller who founded Standard Oil. The Trilateral Commission was kick started with a donation from the Ford-Foundation to work for the same goal : a one-world government. The Trilateral Commission's roots stems from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. Senator Barry Goldwater said this of the TC : "The Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the U.S - David Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of the Trilateral Commission.

The Bilderberg Group
David Rockefeller is also a member of the Bilderberg group, a highly secretive international think tank who meets annually since 1954. This group, some believe conspires to foster global government. It was founded by Joseph Retinger, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland. Bilderberg invites 100 (or more) of "the most powerful people in Europe and North America", for annual, closed door meetings at five star resorts. The group stresses secrecy : "What's said at a Bilderberg conference stays at a Bilderberg conference." http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/bilderberg-group/ Another prominent member of the Bilderberg group is Dr Henry Kissinger who was instrumental in the downfall of South Africa and a personal friend of Pik Botha, former Foreign Affairs and Information Minister of South Africa. You can read more and watch some interesting videos at the links below.

Bilderberg group http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bilderberg
The Tavistock Institute for Human Behaviour http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tavistock_Institute_for_Human_Behavior

The Tavistock Institute
In his book Conspirators' Hierarchy : The Story of the Committee of 300, Dr. John Coleman, "a former intelligence agent of British MI6," discusses the The Tavistock Institute for Human Behaviour. (Founded in 1946 by a grant from the Rockefeller foundation). The Tavistock Institute developed the mass brainwashing techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners of war in Korea. Its experiments in crowd control methods have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in 1933 as a refugee, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War II. Coleman states that "All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the dictators of the World Order. There are numerous other organizations at play in this global game that is marching us on to a One World Government. They all interlink and who all strive for the same goal, that of a one world government, but the major players at this poker game have been named and will suffice as far as this article stretches. This rabbit hole is unbelievably deep. The bottom of which we are still trying to find. It is only through an understanding of the position of South Africa and its White population in the context of these international role players and organizations that we will be able to understand why South Africa had to be handed over to black Marxist terrorist. It is not my aim to expose every single person or organization who is striving for this "One World Socialist Utopia". To me it will be sufficient if the reader can grasp and comprehend that the attack on South Africa had very little to do with our internal politics of "Separate, but equal development", today known as "Apartheid".

It was an orchestrated plan flowing down from the top of international globalists; both Communist and Capitalists, who saw South Africa as a major stone in the path of their march towards a totalitarian one world government. Not only did we have untold riches in minerals beneath the soil of or country, not only did we control a major shipping route around the Cape of Good Hope, but we were also a shining example of the success of Nationalism as opposed to the failure of Communism on the rest of the continent and in the rest of the world. Communism is such a useless self destructing system that primary school children can grasp the simplicity of its failures. Without massive financial support from the Western Capitalists it would soon self destruct and disappear down the toilet of political and economical ideas. The sick Frankenstein Monster of Communism is plugged into a lifeline from global bankers who ensures that their creation, their diabolical baby, survives. A good example is the two Portuguese colonies of Angola and Mozambique. In Angola the Americans supported the mildly communist Dr. Jonas Savimbi of UNITA against the severely Communist MPLA government with money and "Stinger" missiles. In Mozambique the Communist FRELIMO were supported by the Chase Manhattan Bank of David Rockefeller. The opposition RENAMO, supported from South Africa was about to take over control in Mozambique at one stage, when David Rockefeller personally flew in to prop up the Communist FRELIMO Government. The effect of the carnage that took place in those two countries is still visible to this day. To us it will always seems like a Capatalist/Communist paradox, something that does not make sense. But Author Garry Allen in his book, "None dare call it Conspiracy" sums it up beautifully on page 32 : "If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite."

Page 35
If you wanted to control the nation's manufacturing, commerce, finance, transportation and natural resources, you would need only to control the apex, the power pinnacle, of an all-powerful socialist government. Then you would have a monopoly and could squeeze out all your competitors. If you wanted a national monopoly, you must control a national socialist government. If you want - a worldwide monopoly, you must control a world socialist government. That is what the game is all about. "Communism" is not a movement of the downtrodden masses but is a movement created, manipulated and used by power-seeking billionaires in order to gain control over the world, first by establishing socialist governments in the various nations and then consolidating them all through a "Great Merger," into an all-powerful world, socialist super-state

Page 37
But the ultimate advantage the creditor has over the king or president is that if the ruler gets out of line the banker can finance his enemy or rival. Therefore, if you want to stay in the lucrative king-financing business, it is wise, to have an enemy or rival waiting in the wings to unseat every king or president to whom you lend. If the king doesn't have an enemy, you must create one.

And so my dear readers were an enemy created. That "Enemy" was "Apartheid" and the whites of South Africa who upheld it.

[Part 15 – Smuts And Rhodes' "World State"]

Part 15 – Smuts And Rhodes' "World State"

The history you will read below is denied to most students today at school, but relatively freely available to people who are willing to do the research and make the connections. Today we find many so called "Conspiracy theorists" who speak of a "World State" and those who try to make them off as nutters, even in the face of hardcore proven facts and evidence. Most of the time truth and facts are all we need to see and understand what happened to South Africa. The idea of a "One world government" with a one world army and police force under the UN, might be familiar to most readers who are observers of world affairs and who can see that we are daily tiptoeing towards a Communist totalitarian state. What most people do not know is that since Machiavelli first rolled the ball and proposed the basic idea of world government and rule without scruple of justice or humanity, the ball was picked up in South Africa by team mates Rhodes and Smuts who ran with it. In order for us to understand why Apartheid was scapegoated to hand South Africa over to Marxist Black terrorists; how South Africa became the skunk amongst nations, why the Western Capitalist as well as the Communists and every man and his dog ganged up on us, we have to look at events holistically. We need to see the roots, the trunk the branches and the position of the tree in the forest. We need to see the position of the forest in the country, the country on the continent, the continent in the world and the world in the universe.

It is only then that we will understand why South Africa had to go and why Dr. H.F. Verwoerd, who saw himself as an "unmovable piece of granite" was assassinated. A good point to start with is the idea of "Holism" or the man who coined the word "holistic" namely General Field Marshal Jan Smuts. Today when one speaks to black people in South Africa one would soon hear that they do not really mind racists, because they say, "At least we know where we stand". With Liberals it is a different story. Helen Zille of the DA has tried her entire life to win the support and respect of the blacks, but I can assure her it will never happen. In Credo Mutwa's book, "My People" he says that blacks do not trust liberals. Blacks never know where they stand with liberals who are nice in front of them, but try to shaft them behind their backs. Blacks of South Africa have an immense respect for President Paul Kruger, but they have no respect for Jan Smuts, and with good reason. Jan Smuts advocated racial segregation for most of his career, but after loosing the election in 1948 to the National Party he changed his tune and issued the Fagan Report. The main recommendation of the commission's report was that influx control of African people to urban areas should be relaxed.

During the Second Anglo Boer War he led Boer troops in the Transvaal under Koos De la Rey who were supplied by the Germans, but afterwards in the First World War he turned against the Germans and Koos De la Rey and fought on the side of the British, with General Botha annexing the German Colony, German South West Africa, now known as Namibia and commanding the British in German East Africa. Smuts was a bright character. He graduated from Stellenbosch University with honours in Science and Literature. He then studied many subjects at Cambridge in England amongst other things, Law. Back in Cape Town he became a lawyer and journalist for the Cape Times. He also became friends with Cecil John Rhodes, who owned the De Beers mining company, and became his personal law advisor. When Rhodes launched the Jameson Raid in 1895-96 Smuts was furious and felt betrayed by his friend and employer and subsequently left De Beers to go to Johannesburg. Again Smut's erratic behaviour came to the fore. At first he fully supported Rhodes' expansionism policies, but suddenly was its biggest opponent. After the war, Smuts was instrumental in drawing up plans for the unification of the two Boer Republics of Orange Free State and Transvaal and the two British colonies of Natal and the Cape that happened in 1910.

Smuts created the South African Defence Force and served on the British Imperial war cabinet during WW1 as well as WW2. He also helped to create the Royal Air Force. He was a signature at the treaty of Versailles and a proponent of The League of Nations, the forerunner of the United Nations. After WW2 Smuts worked day and night to draw up the charter for the new United Nations. Smuts had a driving force and personal philosophy called "Holism" defined as "the tendency in nature to form wholes that are greater than the sum of the parts through creative evolution". One biographer ties together his far-reaching political vision with his technical philosophy : "It had very much in common with his philosophy of life as subsequently developed and embodied in his Holism and Evolution. Small units must need develop into bigger wholes, and they in their turn again must grow into larger and ever-larger structures without cessation. Advancement lay along that path. Thus the unification of the four provinces in the Union of South Africa, the idea of the British Commonwealth of Nations, and, finally, the great whole resulting from the combination of the peoples of the earth in a great league of nations were but a logical progression consistent with his philosophical tenets." Smuts was seriously disappointed when at the first UN general assembly in 1946, India chastised him about his racial policies and the condition of Indians in SA.

Smuts' view of Africans was patronising, he saw them as immature human beings that needed the guidance of whites, an attitude that reflected the common perceptions of the white minority population of South Africa in his life time and in 1929 he justified the erection of separate institutions for blacks and whites in tones reminiscent of the later practice of apartheid. The United Nations would be one of the first double speak, Orwellian Newspeak names we will encounter, because the UN is an organisation that is suppose to keep peace, but their means is making war, an organisation that did not come to unite nations, but to destroy nations on its march to a one world government. But what about Cecil John Rhodes, Smuts' drinking partner before the Anglo/Boer War ? Rhodes got much of his ideas from John Ruskin, a "Do-Gooder" liberal arsehole who was famous for his impassionate championship of "the downtrodden masses". Funny enough, Ruskin's life ended with a mental breakdown as so often happens with La-La-Land Liberals who think themselves God-Like. Nevertheless Rhodes was a student of Ruskin at Oxford where Ruskin spoke of a "New Imperialism". He told his aristocratic students that to preserve their privileged lives they have to absorb the lower classes and that they have to extend it to the non-English world.

Rhodes was greatly influenced by Ruskin and when he arrived in SA, he had an idea and that was to make the entire Africa British or as he said it, "Paint the map of Africa Red (i.e. British)". More than fifty biographies were written about Rhodes, A university in Grahamstown South Africa is named after him, two countries (North and South Rhodesia) were named after him. (Today called Zambia and Zimbabwe).A massive memorial to him stands below the University of Cape Town. In his first will, Rhodes wrote his ambition was " extending British rule , throughout the world and founding so great a power as to hereafter render wars impossible and promote the interest of humanity." Rhodes also set up a secret society called the Round Table based on the Jesuit model (Society of Jesus) and interestingly enough also the model that Adam Weishaupt of the Bavarian Illuminati adopted in 1785 and also used by the Communists. The model works on a principal of circles within circles where the inner circles knows more than the circles surrounding it. In the inner circle ("Circle of initiates") were Lord Rothchild, Sir Harry Johnston, Mr Balfour, and other personages prominent on the South African scene. The outer circle was called "the Association of Helpers" or as Lenin called them, "The useful idiots". We simply refer to them as "Liberals".

Another of Rhodes's legacies is the Rhodes Scholarship under which about a hundred young men are handpicked from the British empire, the USA and Germany every year to spend two years at Oxford University where they receive special instruction in world affairs, the object being so that, "after 30 years there would be between two and three thousand men in the prime of life scattered all over the world, each one of whom would have impressed on his mind in the most susceptible period of his life the dream of the Founder. Moreover each one of whom, would have been specially, mathematically selected towards the Founder's purpose". Prominent Rhodes scholars include Bill Clinton, actor/singer Kris Kristofferson, Edwin Hubble (Hubble space tellescope), film director Terrence Malik (The Thin red Line and Badlands) and feminist Naomi Wolf who wrote "The beauty myth". Lord Milner became the head of the Round Table in 1891 and surrounded himself with a group of young men called, "Milner's Kindergarten". Prominent members were, Phillip Kerr who held many positions in British South Africa, Lord Lothian, British ambassador in Washington and Lionel Curtis British Official and author who promoted a World State. He became the head of the Round Table when Milner died. Lord Lothian was the one who said that, "We should strive to build the Kingdom of Heaven on Earth". I find it amusing how "World State", "One World Government" proponents always claim that "Peace" and "Heaven" will come of their efforts, but in reality it just brings more and more war, suffering and death. Blacks in South Africa and Africa as a whole believe that they have aquired "Freedom", but all they experience is death and misery. As George Orwell said in "1984", "War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery and Ignorance is Strength".