Messages

You don't need to go to college or anything to teach what you know.

Here's an idea. Is there a topic or two that you feel you are worthy of teaching?

Start a workshop on your topic.

Hang up some flyers outside or leave them half under people door mats.

After the workshop you will have time to suggest your students look into N.E.R or other Klassen books.

I bet you will get more of a reaction then just hanging up Creativity flyers, and you will be giving an educational edge to your fellow white who need that to survive in this competitive life.

I found this today on Stormfront. It's much more than a quote but I thought it worthwhile to post here none the less. He really hits the nail on the head when it comes to the modern Jewish Question.

Zionism, or Israeli-state nationalism, is but one wing of Jewish supremacism. Some Orthodox Jews who hate gentiles by default, due to being orthodox followers of the Talmud, are against Israel too. Some Jews are against Zionism simply because if all of these wretched creatures were forced to live in the same state, they'd only have each other, "God's Chosen", to prey on and exploit. Would a Jew still be a Jew, if he could not destroy gentile society and financially exploit its inhabitants? There are only so many Palestinian children to kill.

Chomsky is still a Jewish chauvanist when it comes to European culture and prosperity, European traditional and religious values-regardless of whether he goes in for the whole killing Palestinian babies thing. You claim communist and anarchist Jews are consistent in their "anti-racism". Yet when we actually take a look at their activities, its not racial chauvanism they are against, but rather, it is explicity European survivalism they are opposed to. The reason for this is because our race are the primary and most able competitors to Jewish hegemony, the communist Jew sought to undermine European group solidarity by turning one class section against another, or in more recent times launch an all out attack against Europeans, using a lower race as a proxy (under the faux-rationale of "oppression").

In South Africa and the United States especially, the communist Jew has historically been an ardent supporter of black chauvanism (including the Black Panthers, NAACP and ANC), as part of the Jewish racial war against Europeans. The Jew hoped to transform the negroid (whom he views as too stupid and primitive to challenge his own financial hegemony) into a new "proletariat" to slit the throats of the ethnic Europeans. The only reason the Jew has broke with black nationalism in the US to some extent, is because much to their surprise some of the negroids began to become more educated and questioned the Jewish role in the exploitation of the negroid, especially his role in the slave trade.

It is incredibly naive to suggest Jewish dominated political movements, right across the spectrum from communism to neoconservatism, are not in some way an expression of their own ethnocentrism, even if the former is more cleverly veiled than the latter (keep in mind the former emerged during a time of widespread societal suspicion of Jews and many of them even tried to hide their real names, they had to try and veil their intentions at the time as a historical nessesity; in the USA they don't have to do that so much with neoconservatism, due to the philosemitic current laid down by the Puritans). There are a few Jews, like Paul Gottfried, who it can objectively be said, have turned against all strains of Jewish chauvanism and thrown their lot in with the European people. These are incredibly rare however and do not absolve the majority Jewish political activity.

Source.

[ANY]

Just a quick community service message from your friendly Geek.

As some may know, not too long ago the Blood & Honour webforum was hacked by assorted anti-White scumbags. The passwords, private information and private messages from that forum was then released online for all to see. I know for a fact that at least one but probably many others were fired from their jobs or had personal problems relating to this information being leaked.

It should be known by all internet users, especially Creators, that ANY website can be hacked. If the hackers wish to spend enough of their time and resources finding a way in, they will find it! This website is hosted by a reliable company and the Creativity Alliance has done all it can to protect this forum and it's other websites from being hacked. However, your privacy is your responsibility!

There are a number of tips that I will list below that will further protect your personal information from hackers if this website is compromised. It's not perfect but if something goes wrong, you'll be glad that you followed it.

1. Don't put anything on this website that you're not willing for our enemies to see.

2. Use a different password for different websites, especially your email accounts. Having 3-4 passwords may be harder to remember but it is allows for multiple lines of defence against hackers.

3. Do not use the same email you use for this website in your professional life. Often [potential] employers will Google your email to see what it comes up with!

4. Prune your Private Messages often! There is an option on the Messages page that will allow you to delete all your posts at once.

There's probably many more of these, so if anybody else can think of one, please add it to the list. We should all be aware of our online privacy and the necessary precautions to ensure our safety as much as possible.

Thanks for your time folks.

RAHOWA!

Brother Grimm.

[I/]

Nazi Rock Documentary

These videos have some good footage of the National Alliance store, a little bit about Brother August Smith and some interviews with various pro-White musicians. Music will always be one of the best means for recruiting the youth and is also a tried and proven method of building a financial "fighting fund" for the resistance.

Enjoy.

I/

Nazi Rock Documentary (1/4)

II/

Nazi Rock Documentary (2/4)

III/

Nazi Rock Documentary (3/4)

IV/

Nazi Rock Documentary (4/4)

Source:  http://www.aolnews.com/story/is-us-a-melting-pot-interracial-marriage/1082093


WASHINGTON -Melting pot or racial divide? The growth of interracial marriages is slowing among U.S.-born Hispanics and Asians. Still, blacks are substantially more likely than before to marry whites.

The number of interracial marriages in the U.S. has risen 20 percent since 2000 to about 4.5 million, according to the latest census figures. While still growing, that number is a marked drop-off from the 65 percent increase between 1990 and 2000.

About 8 percent of U.S. marriages are mixed-race, up from 7 percent in 2000.

The latest trend belies notions of the U.S. as a post-racial, assimilated society. Demographers cite a steady flow of recent immigration that has given Hispanics and Asians more ethnically similar partners to choose from while creating some social distance from whites due to cultural and language differences.

White wariness toward a rapidly growing U.S. minority population also may be contributing to racial divisions, experts said.

"Racial boundaries are not going to disappear anytime soon," said Daniel Lichter, a professor of sociology and public policy at Cornell University. He noted the increase in anti-immigrant sentiment in the U.S. after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks as well as current tensions in Arizona over its new immigration law.
"With a white backlash toward immigrant groups, some immigrants are more likely to turn inward to each other for support," Lichter said.

Broken down by race, about 40 percent of U.S.-born Asians now marry whites — a figure unchanged since 1980. Their likelihood of marrying foreign-born Asians, meanwhile, multiplied 3 times for men and 5 times for women, to roughly 20 percent.
Among U.S.-born Hispanics, marriages with whites increased modestly from roughly 30 percent to 38 percent over the past three decades. But when it came to marriages with foreign-born Hispanics, the share doubled — to 12.5 percent for men, and 17.1 percent for women.
In contrast, blacks are now three times as likely to marry whites than in 1980. About 14.4 percent of black men and 6.5 percent of black women are currently in such mixed marriages, due to higher educational attainment, a more racially integrated military and a rising black middle class that provides more interaction with other races.
The numbers reflect in part an internal struggle that Asians and Hispanics say they feel navigating two cultural worlds — the U.S. and their parents' homeland.

Hai Nguyen, 37, of Houston recalls the instant connection she felt after meeting her first Vietnamese boyfriend, Greg, in college. Nguyen says while she had to explain herself to white boyfriends, with Greg it was a feeling that "he so gets me, because we eat the same food, we like the same things, our families know each other and there is so little that needs to be said."
With the enthusiastic support of her parents, she and Greg married. But their connection soon began to fade, due partly to Nguyen's budding career as a business analyst, which clashed with more traditional expectations for her to "always have fresh food on the table." The two divorced and Nguyen is now remarried to Jon, who is white.
"My parents have prejudices, but they've accepted it," said Nguyen. She described occasionally feeling different with her parents and other single-race couples. "They know it's inevitable. My native tongue will eventually fade, and history will take its course."
The demographic shifts can complicate conventional notions of racial identity.


Due to increasing interracial marriages, multiracial Americans are a small but fast-growing demographic group, making up about 5 percent of the minority population. Together with blacks, Hispanics and Asians, the Census Bureau estimates they collectively will represent a majority of the U.S. population by mid-century.
Still, many multiracial people — particularly those who are part black — shun a "multi" label in favor of identifying as a single race.
By some estimates, two-thirds of those who checked the single box of "black" on the census form are actually mixed, including President Barack Obama, who identified himself as black in the 2010 census even though his mother was white.
Census figures also show:

_Hawaii had the highest share of mixed marriages, about 32 percent. It was followed by Alaska, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Nevada, which ranged from 15 percent to 19 percent. The bottom five states were Pennsylvania, Maine, Kentucky, Mississippi and West Virginia, each ranging from 3 percent to 4 percent.

_Mississippi had the fastest growth in mixed marriages from 2000-08, a sign of closer ties between blacks and whites, though it still ranked second to last in overall share of mixed marriages.

_Mixed marriages jumped from 2.25 million to 3.7 million, or 65 percent, from 1990-2000, as such unions became more broadly accepted in Southern states.

_Among U.S.-born whites, about 0.3 percent married blacks in 1980; that figure rose to about 1 percent in 2008. About 0.3 percent of whites married Asians in 1980 and about 1 percent in 2008. About 2 percent of whites married Hispanics in 1980, rising to about 3.6 percent in 2008.

Juan Thurman, 37, a Houston sales account manager, says both family pressure and a strong ethnic identity weighed heavily on him as a Hispanic when he was dating, even as he found himself interacting more with other races in school.
In high school and at Rice University, Thurman said, he had fewer opportunities to meet Hispanic women in his honors classes. Ultimately, he married Emily, who is white, based on shared life views of gender equity and a liberal outlook toward religion. He relishes having friends of many different backgrounds.
"Interracial marriage is not a big deal," Thurman said. "Still, from a family standpoint, I did feel culturally different and I continue to feel so."
The figures come from previous censuses as well as the 2008 American Community Survey, which surveys 3 million households. The figures for "white" refer to those whites who are not of Hispanic ethnicity. For purposes of defining interracial marriages, Hispanic is counted as a race.
—
Online:
http://www.census.gov