Messages

Youtube: 

sex with elaphant:-)))....big mistake

   In each species Nature has implanted a strong urge for the survival and perpetuation of its own kind. It is over-abundantly apparent that Nature urges the inner segregation of each species. Among birds there are, for instance, 87 species of kingfishers; there are 175 species of woodpeckers; there are 265 species of fly-catchers; there are 75 species of larks; there are also 75 species of swallows; there are approximately 100 species in the jay, magpie and crow family; in the vast realm of fishes, there are for instance, 250 known species of sharks and so on. Furthermore, once a species is firmly established, it will practically never interbreed with that of another species of the same family. For example, canvasback ducks may be swimming and feeding in the same pond as a flock of pintail ducks, but they will not interbreed. They will strictly mate only with their own kind, the pintail duck with the pintail duck, and the canvasbacks with the canvas backs.

   The brown bears may live in the same forest with the black bears, but they, too, instinctively know enough not to interbreed. They will stay strictly with their own kind. There may be 175 species of woodpeckers, but they, too, strictly stay with their own kind and do not interbreed. The 75 species of swallows may all have originally descended from one species a long time back in their evolution, but they do not retrogress and interbreed amongst each other and become again one mixed-up species of swallows. No, Nature does not plan it that way. If this were not so, then all the species would soon be mongrelized into one mixed-up species. Furthermore, the mongrelized swallow would soon breed with the 75 species of larks and we would soon have a swallark. The mongrelized swallark would soon breed with mongrelized cardinals and bluebirds and the whole process would degenerate into a mongrelized bird. The end result would soon be that birds would lose their own innate, peculiar characteristics that enabled them to survive all these
thousands of years.

www.MarilynManson.com   -  New logo looks like famous Nazi emblem. 

Many songs in the past from this artist have had hints of white pride and racism including "Spade", "Great Big White World" and a cover song from Patty Smith titled "Rock and Roll Nigger" as well as others.

Will this new logo appear on his upcoming album? His first album after being dropped by "Insterscope Records" which is one of the major record labels in existence, probably infested with Jews.

Has any artist of this caliber taken such a radical stand in possible solidarity to views closely linked to our own?

Support this world recognized artist and buy his upcoming album (if it carries the pseudo-Nazi logo). It will make a GREAT ice breaker into a much deeper conversation.  I don't know why, but people respect the opinions of famous artists and find it easy to identify with their standpoints. It could just be a phenomenon of artistic expression.

THIS NEW UPCOMING CD BELONGS IN YOUR COLLECTION!!

www.MarilynManson.com 

No worries, Br. Pat. Like I said I can't start for another couple weeks anyway.

You can send the picture to my email address.  Thanks!

Brother, please see our older edition handbooks for details outlining Creative ceremonies.

I pulled the Confirmation of Loyalty ceremony verbatim from the Little White Book.

By the way, do you have a larger version of your avatar?

From that article, the father as priest:

The domestic responsibilities of the pater familias included his priestly duties (sacra familiae) to his "household gods" (the lares and penates) and the ancestral gods of his own gens. The latter were represented by the di parentes as ancestral shades of the departed, and by the genius cult. Genius has been interpreted as the essential, heritable spirit (or divine essence, or soul) and generative power that suffused the gens and each of its members. As the singular, lawful head of a family derived from a gens, the pater familias embodied and expressed its genius through his pious fulfillment of ancestral obligations. The pater familias was therefore owed a reciprocal duty of genius cult by his entire familia. He in his turn conferred genius and the duty of sacra familiae to his children – whether by blood or by adoption.

Roman religious law defined the religious rites of familia as sacra privata (funded by the familia rather than the state) and "unofficial" (not a rite of state office or magistracy, though the state pontifices and censor might intervene if the observation of sacra privata was lax or improper. The responsibility for funding and executing sacra privata therefore fell to the head of the household and no other. As well as observance of common rites and festivals (including those marked by domestic rites), each family had its own unique internal religious calendar – marking the formal acceptance of infant children, coming of age, marriages, deaths and burials. In rural estates, the entire familia would gather to offer sacrifice(s) to the gods for the protection and fertility of fields and livestock. All such festivals and offerings were presided over by the pater familias.