http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/business/work/why-the-rich-gulf-states-are-saying-no-to-syrias-refugees/story-fnkjjewf-1227518333430
THESE countries boast an embarrassment of riches.
But as European governments face global scrutiny over their struggle to accommodate a mass exodus of refugees from war-torn Syria, what are the rich Gulf nations doing to help?
Absolutely nothing.
Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees, according to new data from Amnesty International.
The apparent indifference of the Gulf states is especially blunt considering they are some of the nearest neighbours to devastated Syria, where civil war and the threat of Islamic State militants have displaced millions of people.
Thousands of refugees are risking their lives in desperate hope of finding safety and prosperity in stable nations. Many have died trying to get there.
"I'm most indignant over the Arab countries who are rolling in money and who only take very few refugees," Danish Finance Minister Claus Hjort Frederiksen said in an interview this week.
"Countries like Saudi Arabia. It's completely scandalous."
They're not alone. Russia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea have also been called out by Amnesty International for offering zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees.
More than four million Syrian refugees have been resettled in just five nations: Turkey (1.9 million Syrian refugees), Lebanon (1.2 million), Jordan (650,000), Iraq (249,463) and Egypt (132,375).
Globally, 104,410 resettlement places have been offered, but that's a mere 2.6 per cent of the total population of Syrian refugees, Amnesty International said.
And their lives there are not easy. Funding shortages have forced many refugees in Lebanon to live on less than half a dollar a day, while in Jordan, 80 per cent live below the poverty line.
But in Saudi Arabia, some citizens routinely leave the air-conditioning on in their empty homes while they jet around the world.
In a television interview this week, Kuwaiti commentator Fahad Alshelaimi said his country was simply too expensive for refugees, New York Timesreported.
"You can't welcome people from another environment and another place who have psychological or nervous system problems or trauma and enter them into societies," he said, adding Kuwait was more appropriate for labourers.
Others argue the Gulf states have generously contributed humanitarian aid.


THESE countries boast an embarrassment of riches.
But as European governments face global scrutiny over their struggle to accommodate a mass exodus of refugees from war-torn Syria, what are the rich Gulf nations doing to help?
Absolutely nothing.
Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Bahrain have offered zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees, according to new data from Amnesty International.
The apparent indifference of the Gulf states is especially blunt considering they are some of the nearest neighbours to devastated Syria, where civil war and the threat of Islamic State militants have displaced millions of people.
Thousands of refugees are risking their lives in desperate hope of finding safety and prosperity in stable nations. Many have died trying to get there.
"I'm most indignant over the Arab countries who are rolling in money and who only take very few refugees," Danish Finance Minister Claus Hjort Frederiksen said in an interview this week.
"Countries like Saudi Arabia. It's completely scandalous."
They're not alone. Russia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea have also been called out by Amnesty International for offering zero resettlement places to Syrian refugees.
More than four million Syrian refugees have been resettled in just five nations: Turkey (1.9 million Syrian refugees), Lebanon (1.2 million), Jordan (650,000), Iraq (249,463) and Egypt (132,375).
Globally, 104,410 resettlement places have been offered, but that's a mere 2.6 per cent of the total population of Syrian refugees, Amnesty International said.
And their lives there are not easy. Funding shortages have forced many refugees in Lebanon to live on less than half a dollar a day, while in Jordan, 80 per cent live below the poverty line.
But in Saudi Arabia, some citizens routinely leave the air-conditioning on in their empty homes while they jet around the world.
In a television interview this week, Kuwaiti commentator Fahad Alshelaimi said his country was simply too expensive for refugees, New York Timesreported.
"You can't welcome people from another environment and another place who have psychological or nervous system problems or trauma and enter them into societies," he said, adding Kuwait was more appropriate for labourers.
Others argue the Gulf states have generously contributed humanitarian aid.