Messages

[Christianity Exposed, Parts I and II]

Christianity Exposed, Parts I and II
By Sister Christine M. Johns
Edited and Revised by Reverend Matt Hale

Christianity Exposed, Parts I and II

Christianity, besides being one of the world's largest religions, is probably the one which has had the most profound effect on mankind. It is generally considered to be an enlightened religion based on reason and love. Compared to the primitive, heathen superstitions which preceded it, Christianity is regarded to have had a beneficial and civilizing effect on mankind.

However, as our Founder, Ben Klassen, has shown us, reality completely contradicts these almost universally held beliefs. Christianity is not a religion at all but a cruel and subversive system devised by the Jews to befuddle, pervert, and enslave the White Race.

From 66 A.D. to 70 A.D., the Jews were engaged in a fierce war with the Romans. After the fall of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., when the victorious Romans burnt their temple to the ground, they realized that militarily they were no match for the Romans and so conceived of a more ingenious plan to destroy them--Christianity! As this strategy proved successful, the Jews later applied it to the rest of the world, particularly the White western part, with the same aim.

The Jews did this because of their religion. The driving force of the Jewish religion is a terrible and pathological hatred of their hosts--meaning that they hate the people of any country giving them shelter or in which they settle, even voluntarily, however kind the indigenous peoples may be. The Jews therefore regarded the White Race and particularly the Romans who had subjugated them, as an enemy deserving to be swept from the face of the earth. As our Founder, Ben Klassen said, "They hated Rome with an inhuman hatred." They also hated the Babylonians--"The Whore of Babylon"--who had once captured nd enslaved them, even though the Babylonians treated them relatively kindly and later released them.

Thus, as Ben Klassen has taught us, because of their fanatical hatred of the Romans, the Jews concocted Christianity in order to defeat their opponents by perverting their instincts and muddling their thoughts with ludicrous ideas. Christianity has had, and continues to have, a catastrophic effect on the White Race, especially in its fight against the Jews and the colored races.

Klassen tells us that "Christianity despises fact, reasoning, evidence, [and] logic," and to succumb to the Christian philosophy is "to indulge in a cowardly flight from reality . . . to destroy reason and common sense." Christianity prevents Whites, like "born-again" Christians, from being able to protect their own race. "A born-again Christian is a pervert who has had his instincts warped, his mind unhinged, and his total outlook on life, outlook on sex and on the survival of his kind completely perverted from that, which as a natural human being, he was originally created by Nature. He becomes a destroyer of his own race."

The Jews were first heard of around 2,000 B.C. when they migrated from Mesopotamia to Southern Canaan (Palestine) on the borders of Egypt where they eventually settled. However, brands of Jews made constant forays into Egypt and eventually established themselves there is large numbers. However, they cruelly exploited the Egyptians who, so enraged by their depredations and treachery, expelled them from the country in 1225 B.C. to return to their compatriots in Canaan.

During this time, the Jews discovered the amazing power of religion, both as a weapon of defense and attack. As Ben Klassen has shown us, the Old Testament is the weapon used in its defensive form and was concocted by the Jewish religious leaders to unify the aggressive, warring Jews, to give them a binding creed, a sense of purpose and identity. Very early on, Jewish leaders discovered that having a common enemy was unifying and that they therefore preached hatred against all the rest of mankind (the Goyim), making hatred a major tenet of Old Testament writings, and licensed the waging of wars: small and large scale, financial, political, and religious, as well as military against the Goyim. This is why the viciousness of the Old Testament with its "eye for an eye" and "tooth for a tooth" philosophy has so often been commented on.

However, the Old Testament is also a collection of pornographic stories, probably false or exaggerated, about Jews like David, Abraham, Solomon, and Lot, many of whom probably did not even exist, but which nevertheless show the cruel, murderous, and materialistic nature of the Jews; and how all that is bad by Christian standards is revered by them, clearly shown by the respect given to their filthy and immoral heroes and leaders.

Christianity Exposed, Part II

Klassen has shown us that all the stories of the Old Testament are fantastic, ridiculous, and absurd, and he often called the writers of the Old Testament "scriptwriters,"-obviously with the example of Hollywood in mind. At the same time, Klassen refused to allow Jewish apologists to absolve their fellows for the evil that permeates the Old Testament, for as he rightly points out, the stories contained in it are really "only the reflections of the inmost meanderings of the collective, perverted Jewish mind"!

Jewish leaders also wrote the New Testament. This work has always been presented as being full of enlightened ideas, but reality is a bit different. The advice contained in the New Testament is complete and utter nonsense and its teachings were designed to divide, confuse, and destroy the White Race; to tear apart the fabric of society by setting people not only against their fellows and families, but even against themselves, and against their own healthy instincts. This divisive intent is clearly shown in St. Luke's gospel (12:51-53) where Christ says: "Suppose ye that I am come to give peace to the earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: for from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law." It is hard to see how this is enlightened thinking.

The main point of the New Testament is that we can all get to "heaven" if we accept the fictional "Christ" as our "Savior." However, the Christian bible tells us that we can't get there unless we are Jewish. Christ answers the Woman of Canaan, pleading for her sick daughter, by saying, "I am not sent but unto the House of Israel, (Matthew 15:24)- i.e. he will only serve the Jews. But there are also many other barriers to "heaven." Those who love their parents more than Christ are banned (Matthew 10:37); as are speakers of idle words (Matthew 12:31); people who do not forgive all trespasses against them (Matthew 18:35); people who remain rich (Luke 6:24) and people who do not believe in Jesus Christ. Well might his disciples have asked him: "Who then can be saved?" (Matthew 19:25).

But this confusion is just one of the many puzzles in the New Testament. There is the puzzle of the holy trinity: how there can be three persons in one god; how Christ can be a man yet a god at the same time; and also how he can be his own father, as there is only one god. Then there is the incongruity of a cruel and vengeful god who created satan and hell, but who at the same time is supposedly a gentle, loving and protective god. And how we can all be equal in the sight of god, but the Jews are more equal - the "Chosen People" of god? Moreover, how can every word in the bible come from this god when much of it is contradictory, particularly the New Testament. And how can human beings possibly be expected to be humble and forgiving as christ exhorts us to be, when his own father, god, is depicted in the Old Testament to be vengeful, vindictive, and vainglorious?

The biggest puzzle of all (though it isn't really meant to be solved) is the Sermon on the Mount, chapters [antixty.jpg] five, six, and seven of Matthew. This "sermon" gives insane advice which most clearly shows the destructive intent of these Jewish teachings. It is absolutely full of false statements, damaging advice, idiotic ideas, and ludicrous prohibitions. For example, Christ says, "Blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the kingdom of heaven" and "Blessed are the meek; for they shall inherit the earth." We all know this is wrong and that while it is not wise to be too forceful, it is the strong, bold, quick, and intelligent who survive and prosper. Christ further says that no one who is rich will be going to heaven (tell that to Jerry Falwell and company) by saying, "Verily I say unto you, there is more chance of a camel passing through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God." He further says, "Go sell all though hast and give it to the poor," "Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon the earth, where moth and rust doth corrupt and thieves break through and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven"- i.e. by giving away all your money.

This advice suggests that it is pointless to be thrifty or industrious: building up a business, providing for one's family, or planning for a better future for oneself, and advocates that we give away all our wealth. This type of advice is very convenient for the Jewish enemy who will be more than eager to relieve us of our well-earned wealth.

MAKE YOUR RACE YOUR RELIGION, NOT CHRISTIANITY!

[Arbeit Macht Frei!]

ARBEIT MACHT FREI! by Sister L. T.

Arbeit Macht Frei!

I recently saw a bumper sticker which said, "If I'd known this was going to happen, I'd have picked my own cotton!" This statement obviously refers to the tragic fact that when White People first used the jew-imported nigger "slaves" to do our work for us, we were starting down the path to racial destruction. An immutable truth is that the "slave" will always revolt against the "master".

This truth is especially applicable to today's scenario of the millions of lazy, traitor White women who continue to hire muds instead of doing as Nature intended: take care of their own domestic tasks and responsibilities, including the raising of their own precious White children! One of the biggest routes by which non-Whites have gained a foothold in our land has been through "domestic" work - cleaning up after White people ( mainly jewess and White female traitors) who claim they are "too busy" with their high-flown "careers" to do their own housework. Legions of these "women" (and I use the term women loosely in this case) continue to employ mud criminals instead of doing their own domestic chores. Their lame excuse that they have to hire wetbacks to clean their homes due to "lack of time" is transparent and bogus. My mother was a dedicated teacher who worked extremely long hours. Our whole family pitched in with the housework and got the chores done without ever resorting to mud "labor". To be blunt, we scrubbed our own toilet, and needless to say, never hired a scummy mestizo or nigger, no matter how "short on time" we were. Such an idea would have been unthinkable.. Male or female, it is imperative that we White People do our own work, with our own two hands, whether it be housework, growing and harvesting our own food, or any other form of labor. It is interesting that in biographies of Hitler, it is sometimes mentioned that for years before becoming the Leader of the German nation , he took care of his own domestic chores, which always impressed me as being symbolic of the cleanliness and the naturally industrious ways of our White Folk. So, man or woman, cleaning up after ourselves is our own duty and obligation and we put another nail in our coffin each time we hire a spic, nig or gook "domestic worker".

As our Founder Ben Klassen states in "The White Man's Bible":

"NEVER AGAIN MUST WE FALL PREY TO THE SUICIDAL IDEA THAT WE NEED (OR CAN USE) CHEAP COLORED LABOR. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER. AS FAR AS WE CREATORS ARE CONCERNED, IN OUR TECHNICAL AGE OF ELECTRONICS AND ATOMIC POWER THE NIGGER IS MORE OBSOLETE THAN THE HORSE.".

The 7th Commandment of our Church states:

"SHOW PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT IN BUSINESS DEALINGS WITH MEMBERS OF YOUR OWN RACE. PHASE OUT ALL DEALINGS WITH JEWS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. DO NOT EMPLOY NIGGERS OR OTHER COLOREDS. HAVE SOCIAL CONTACTS ONLY WITH MEMBERS OF YOUR OWN RACIAL FAMILY. "

The 9th Command of our Church states:

"WORK AND CREATIVITY ARE OUR GENIUS. WE REGARD WORK AS A NOBLE PURSUIT AND OUR WILLINGNESS TO WORK A BLESSING TO OUR RACE.."

Certainly, our Holy Commandments extend to the domestic sphere, which clearly prohibit us , especially our womenfolk, from hiring muds to clean our homes or raise our children.

When we women take care of our household tasks, we must respect the intrinsic value of this work. It is not demeaning. Done properly , it results in a beautiful, clean, inviting peaceful environment for our families, our husbands and our children. Housekeeping and cleaning may not always be our favorite activity :-), but it's something which must be done to maintain pride in ourselves and our homes. It should be a source of great satisfaction for women to know that they are taking their responsibility to keep their homes running well without hiring a slant-eyed, thieving, jabbering creature from the murky depths of racial hell to do it for us. Our Church Commandments, as well as the stirring German exhortation: ARBEIT MACHT FREI must be our guideposts, for truly, our own work makes us free - free of mud domination, control and repression, whether at the basic level of our own homes or in the larger economic sphere. For women, this is an extremely important concept, because we must again celebrate the home as center of our lives, along with the realization that there is nothing demeaning about domestic chores and domestic life. We regard such work as a noble pursuit .

The act of hiring someone else to "do your dirty work " makes you weak, it puts you at the mercy of their hidden resentments and boiling anger and thereby YOU become THEIR slave, not the other way around. I call on all White racially loyal women to publicly denounce all female White traitors who continue to hire mud labor in the domestic realms of life. It is time to once again put this rampant problem front and center and focus media attention upon it. We as White female activists are superbly suited to do this. I vividly recall a news report last year in which a hidden camera in the home of a yuppie White mommy showed a mud freak viciously hitting her defenseless toddler in the head with a spoon. Such scenes brought tears of anger to my eyes. Naturally, "mommy' was horrified, but it hadn't stopped her from hiring this scum in the first place. These ladies from the 'burbs know that "Maria" and "Conchita" are retarded creeps who harm their children and their neighborhood, but they abdicate their larger responsibility to our White community by continuing to employ them for their own self-serving reasons.

While having a maid or gardener was once the privilege of the "rich" , when our women flowed by the millions into corporate jew america to maintain the yuppie suburbanite lifestyle they greedily coveted, it was suddenly possible for a middle class family to hire a mudball from El Spic-a-dor or Spic-er-ragua to scrub their suburbanite potties. White families brought the lowest form of turd world scum into the inner sanctum of their homes. In many areas of Southern California - particularly Los Angeles and San Diego, crud muds finish their "work" at the end of the day as housekeepers, cooks, gardeners or what have you, and then spend their "free time" terrorizing local residents with their usual hobbies: rape, murder , burglary, and drunken mayhem. Filthy, crime -ridden shanty towns infested with these "domestic workers" have popped up on the fringes of yuppie enclaves. The White women who hire this muck feel no sense of altruism or responsibility toward their White Sisters who are raped or assaulted by their criminal "household staff". Such women are "me-first" all the way, and to hell with anyone else. They're like the bartender who keeps the booze flowing for the drunk - the innocent victim he kills or maims on his way home is of no concern once he staggers outside. These women are a prime example of what the World Church of the Creator fights against every day - those who behave like racial islands unto themselves and think they can do whatever they want, with no consequences.

In many cases, female traitors who hire a spic maid or jamaican "nanny" are doing it for PC prestige, to earn " humanitarian brownie points" from their jewess boss so they can be part of the "club" of do-gooder yup-yups;. Jewesses of course have always been the biggest employer of "domestic help" , historically always having the big $$ combined with that notorious jew girl hatred of housework. (oy, do they hate housework!) Being "freed" from the "tyranny" of housework has always been one of the basic and recurring themes of jewish feminism.

Even the hiring of White "au pair" girls from Europe should be discouraged among our People, for that also creates dependency among our women. Doing housework and manual labor of all kinds grounds people. To separate oneself from the domestic chores of one's own home is to distance oneself from the very substance of that home. Such an act says: I live here but I don't contribute to the running of this home. I sleep here, eat here, use the toilet here, but I don't touch the "dirt". I leave that to a gook or a spic." WORK MAKES US FREE , regardless of our "social status" or income level. It reminds us that none of us is so high and mighty or so separate from our kinfolk that we're too "good" to scrub a floor, a toilet, or wash a window. When these notions began to take root among our People, we started down the path to destruction.

I recently read an article entitled "White Men Are Doing It For Themselves" (from Strikeforce, Issue #2), in which the South African settlement of Orania is featured. It states:

"Several Whites Only settlements have begun to spring up across South Africa. One such settlement is called Orania and contains 180 houses which were originally built for construction workers that built a nearby dam on the Orange river........ The use of non-White labor is strictly prohibited. By declaring this, residents of Orania are consciously parodying the originally Voortrekkers in their belief in self-reliance and freedom won through hard work and sacrifice......jobs that are done by blacks across the rest of South Africa are done by Whites in Orania as they aim to be totally self-sufficient."

We Creators salute the South African settlers of Orania and applaud their goal of total self-sufficiency. On the glorious day when Creativity World Headquarters is established, all work will be done by Creators , whatever that work entails. We'll pick our own cotton, symbolically and literally! Above all, our Creator women, unlike the millions of White sell-outs today, will take full responsibility for insuring that the domestic sphere is orderly and well-run, and once again show the world what it means to be a woman and thus fulfill Nature's Eternal laws. ARBEIT MACHT FREI! RAHOWA!

[I thought this would fit onto the CA homepage in the Women's section in place of "Your Article Here":]

I thought this would fit onto the CA homepage in the Women's section in place of "Your Article Here":

Training Our Children To Victory
By Sister L. T.

Training Our Children To Victory

Recently, I saw an all too-common scene: a child who appeared to be about three years old, having a temper tantrum in the middle of the street, while his mother looked on helplessly. Both child and mother were of our beloved White Race. The child then struck his mother in the knees repeatedly, while she stood there as if she didn't know what to do. She finally had to physically drag him down the street by the arm like a rag doll, while he let his body go limp. I watched in utter disgust as a grown, adult woman allowed a toddler to terrorize her and dominate her. Over the last several years, I have seen many instances of this same type of insane breakdown of parental authority in White households. It seems one cannot go anywhere in public these days without witnessing an out of control child and a "helpless" adult who stands there, wringing his or her hands like a baby themselves. Or, looking the other way as if to pretend that they don't know what's going on while their child acts like a whining brat. I can't recall the last time I saw a well-behaved child in a public place, which is sad commentary.

At such moments, I hang my head in shame for our Race. I realize that once again, JOG has won. Years of liberal education theories and "do your own thing" ,most of which began back in the 1960's in the jew feminist and "hippie" era, have led our White People down the most suicidal and destructive path that any People has ever known. In today's confused world, a swat on the behind is called "child abuse" and the Thought Police, along with Big Brother, rush to stop any parent who is exercising their right and their obligation to discipline their own children. Tragically, our womenfolk are the ones who have succumbed the most completely, and been the most brainwashed, by the notion that we mustn't "hurt" our children by disciplining them. Discipline has become synonymous with "harm" . Following an order, or obeying a command from mom and dad is now forbidden because the delicate psyche of the child will be thrown out of balance forever if we dare ask our children to obey a rule. Endless "debating" contests go on between grown adults and little children, and most often, the child wins these debates. I've stood in the supermarket in absolute disbelief while a grown woman argues for 15 or 20 minutes with a toddler about not grabbing items off the shelves. Or asking them for what seems 100 times to "stop it". Other grown adults also look the other way while this nonsense is going on. The child ignores these pleas because they are meaningless, and knows that no punishment will be forthcoming. "Don't do that" and "no" have zero meaning to these little hellions. Of course, I see plenty of "yuppie" dads, standing around while the kids tear up stores, throw food in restaurants, and actually curse and yell profanities at their own parents. I've watched in horror as tiny children strike their own fathers with objects, the father being "oblivious" to the assault,. so this situation is not restricted to our women (I must say, speaking as a woman, that when I see a man unable to control his own children, for me he is an absolutely disgusting symbol of so many of our White males who are unable to stand up to the muds - if they can't control a three year-old, I suppose it is asking a bit much of these wimps to do battle with rampaging nigs.) White women must be vigilant in choosing a mate who understands the concept of parental authority within the home, and has not "bought" the PC jewish line that children should be allowed to do anything they want, whenever they want.

Women, being the primary caretakers of the children within the family unit, are the ones whose attitudes and approach have the most impact on their children's daily lives. And women, as most of us have observed and is widely recognized within the pro-White Cause, are the most vulnerable to the wishy-washy, bleeding heart, do-gooder attitudes promulgated by the jewish mind warping influences of this sick society. White women, on this most important of all levels, seem to have "dropped the ball" in a vital and crucial area of racial survival, namely, raising children who are prepared and fit, physically and mentally, to insure racial victory. Make no mistake - these liberalistic child-rearing policies are not accidental. They came about deliberately and insidiously because the rotten jews who have infiltrated our society from every standpoint - especially our schools - know that the way to undermine a society is at the most basic, root level - the children. If the children are raised without discipline, without integrity, without focus, without drive, without intelligence, they will be weak and ripe for the kill. And has this not proved to be the case? The same children we see today who cuss their own parents, who strike them, who have endless screaming tantrums, who whine about not getting this or that toy, who demand the most expensive clothing and other items in their teen years - these White youth are the future. . These are the seeds we have planted and the fruit from those seeds. These are the young adults who then breed with niggers and hammer the final nails into the coffin of our Race.

When I recall my own childhood, I can't imagine in my wildest dreams behaving like the children I see today. As far as spankings are concerned, I only recall one swat from my mom and I think only one from my dad, but that was sufficient to put an end to any misbehaving on my part. There was no need for any "repeats" . My mother, particularly, was and is a very strong person who simply did not tolerate bad behavior, unlike the wimpy yuppie moms of today who seem not to be bothered even by endless screams, tantrums and other wild behavior from their kids. My mom had perfected the art of giving me just one look and that was enough to straighten me up. Her secret was that I KNEW she meant business and that she would, indeed, exercise her right as a parent to impose punishment on me which I certainly didn't wish to receive :-) I knew it was no idle threat, unlike the kids of today who quite obviously play their weak-willed parents for suckers, (especially their mothers), just as the kikes and muds laugh at weak Whites behind their backs. I see a huge analogy between the breakdown of parental authority at the root family level and the breakdown of the ability of Whites to exercise authority over their own racial destiny. In both cases, they are being "played" - on the one hand , by little kids, and on the other, by the jews and muds who are also actually kids, really just big bullies in the racial " neighborhood." And most assuredly, in both cases, all that has ever been required to straighten up kids or bullies is a resounding "NO" - backed up, not with idle threats, but with punishment that is carried out, not just 'hinted at" .

The latest discipline technique is "time out" or some such nonsense. Or, "let's discuss how you're feeling today about having a tantrum, shall we?" Much of this mental rot stems from the jew psychiatric "profession" and of course the whole stinking feminist ideology where we "get in touch" with our feelings and make sure that we never have to do anything we don't like, or feel something that makes us uncomfortable, or just simply follow a rule. Now - don't get me wrong. I am not advocating that we turn our children into mindless "rule followers". Rules can and should make sense, although no parent should ever be in the position of spending endless hours justifying why they want things done a certain way. Pulling cans off the shelf at the store is clearly unacceptable behavior. It doesn't require an intellectual debate. Cursing and swearing at one's parents is clearly wrong. Striking one's own parents is wrong. It is critical that racially aware parents must train their children to question the "authority" of the jew power structure which will constantly be "ordering" them to do this or that in the name of "world brotherhood". But what many White parents seem not to understand is that for a child to have the capacity to analyze, to debate, to question and to stand up in a focused way, there must first be discipline, and yes, rules at home to provide structure for the child. I am also not advocating some version of "a child should be seen and not heard" philosophy. . A repressive atmosphere where a child is not free to voice their opinions strongly only gives rise to further problems. I had many passionate arguments and debates with my parents on issues and matters which concerned me and I was freely permitted to do so. This, I believe, greatly strengthened my ability to think and reason on my feet which is a tremendous asset to me today as a racial activist for my People. . But what we are seeing today is very tiny children, literally taking control of households full of adults, running their lives, controlling them, to the point where these so-called adults cannot even have an uninterrupted phone conversation without the child yanking the phone out of their hand or screaming endlessly in the background. This is not healthy. This is not productive behavior. I will go as far as to say it is symptomatic of children in agony who are indeed screaming - and what are they screaming for? They are screaming out for rules, screaming in pain for boundaries and discipline which they are not receiving. The end result, pure and simple, is children who are confused and cannot fight the JOG power. Their minds are so scrambled, they have no direction to turn and so they lead lives of empty materialism, sex, alcohol, drugs and other destructive and useless. pursuits. Look around at our White youth. What do you see? I see White parents, both moms and dads, who have utterly abdicated their positions of authority which are rightfully theirs. When I see such weakness and moral laxness, I look back fondly on the German youth of the 1930's who were so staunch, so disciplined, who no doubt wouldn't have dreamed of swearing at their proud, German moms and dads or having screaming tantrums, certainly not in public as we see today, everywhere we go.

As with all problems, we must do more than simply write about it or talk about it. We must seek solutions. And since my focus is on women's role in the racial struggle, I want to analyze just why it is that so many of our White women have fallen down on the job so horribly in this area of parental strength and authority. And it isn't just the working mothers who have lost their grip - I've known many full-time mothers who did not work outside the home, and their kids, too, are out of control. I believe this sad state of affairs has come about for the same reason that the vast majority of White women have turned their backs on our Race - self-serving attitudes, laziness, inner fear, wanting to "look good", and utter lack of integrity. What other explanation is there? Indeed, these women have turned their backs on our Race as well as their own children. This is a high crime. It is traitorism at the highest level. It is a frightening concept, women turning their backs on Race, turning their backs on their own young just so they can continue down the self-serving path they want to without a thought. Imagine any animal in Nature behaving in this fashion - putting their own cub or their own fledgling in danger just out of self-serving interests. It is impossible .This is why we Creators, who look to Nature and study its truths, know that we must get back to the natural survival instinct that even the simplest animals use to stay alive. We must reawaken in our womenfolk these basic natural instincts and drives. Animals discipline and guide their babies sternly, for if they do not, they will die at the hands of their enemies. If we do not begin to face this problem now, I cannot perceive how we will bring forth a new, sound, strong, fighting generation of White boys and girls, White men and women, who will be able to withstand the onslaught - the brown and black tide that even now is rushing full-steam ahead and darkly massing around us like a scene out of Hitchcock's "The Birds", where the birds silently, slowly gather and then, with one signal, fly up in a great mass to attack.

My advice to all White mothers is to fully, 100% reject the jew propaganda that says discipline is wrong! Discipline is NOT wrong and must be exercised to produce a child who will be able to march forward to victory. Educate your child, read to him or her - make sure that books are a part of daily life (of course with an emphasis on books which extol and celebrate White heritage and pride). We of the World Church of the Creator support homeschooling and will be doing many articles in the future on this subject. We know that respect for authority has disappeared from the public schools, but it can still thrive in your own home, so learn more about homeschooling and network among other women who are also pulling their children out of these hell pits. Also, don't ever be afraid to say "no" to your child. "No" (and mean it) is not a dirty word. It has become dirty, because we as Whites are constantly told that we mustn't turn away the "poor illegals", it must be "yes yes yes" to everyone all the time. " Yes" until we're bled dry. Well, your three-year old also understands the concept of yes and no, and the concept of weakness at that early age. Weakness and lack of backbone is sensed by small children and they learn very quickly who they can "con" and who they can't. Take charge in your own household, Sisters, keep order and discipline in the home, and your husband will have respect for you in ways you never dreamed. Some of our men, unfortunately, come home to out of control households, kids screaming, running wild, toys everywhere, etc. And this is at all levels of White society - rich poor and in between. It is our duty and responsibility as women to make sure that our menfolk are not burdened by a household in chaos. They don't need it, you don't need it, and your children sure don't need it.

Training our children for Racial victory - discipline, coupled with love, racial pride and adherence to our Creed of Creativity in all that we do, will insure victory for our beloved White Race. Let us never forget the Golden Rule of the World Church of the Creator: "What is good for the White Race is the highest virtue, what is bad for the White Race is the ultimate sin" . Raising children who cannot fight the racial battle effectively is the ultimate sin - let us, as Creators, begin today to insure that we raise the generation that will make this planet ALL OURS! RAHOWA!

[Of Teutonic Blood - Early Contributions to Civilization of Germans & German-Americans]

The Barnes Review

Of Teutonic Blood - Early Contributions to Civilization of Germans & German-Americans

German and German-American contributions to civilization as we know it have been massive. Great German philosophers, musicians, poets, film makers, inventors and historians, far too many to mention, have shaped the world's ways of thinking over the centuries. Germany always has been considered important to European development—at various times it has been called the crossroads of the entire continent—but the economic might of the modern German nation and the integration of the European Union now have made understanding of German culture and civilization, of German contributions to the development of Western civilization, more important to—and worthy of study by—Americans than at any other time since 1945. Here, in Part One (of two articles) we trace today's German-Americans from the ancient European homeland in 3000 B.C. through the Teutons and medieval Germany to the colonization of America and the War of Independence, wherein one German made all the difference.

By John Nugent

By living in a land that has always been much more oriented toward the present and future than the past, and far more oriented toward itself than the outside world, Americans have become a unique people among the great nations of the Earth. However, they have also become oblivious to geography and history—an interesting trait for a global superpower that intervenes militarily everywhere.

(How many Americans know, for example, that Iraq, an artificial country, has been wracked by ethnic strife since Winston Churchill literally invented it in the 1920s? Apparently not a president who cried, "Mission accomplished!" in 2003.)

Far more than we realize, this ferocious focus by Americans on the here and now, as opposed to the there and then, makes us the regular butt of embarrassing international jokes. (The author, who speaks several European languages fluently and blends in fairly well in Europe, has noticed, at European parties, that whenever the mood needs lifting by a guaranteed laugh, American ignorance of history and geography becomes the target. The British go even further, and to "crack each other up," after trying to check that no Yankee is around, do uproarious imitations of Texan and Brooklynite accents.)

But just as bad as this superpower's not knowing which is Switzerland and which is Swaziland is an obliviousness toward our own forefathers and ancestries that causes us to abandon or even break with our own heritages, with the deeper roots of who we are today.

Who most Americans are is, of course, Europeans by blood; only Amerindians, Aleuts and some Eskimos are indigenous Americans, and hence untaxed casino owners.

In fact, could anyone, even a human from a test tube, understand himself without understanding his own ancestors? Can one understand without this why the Northeast (Irish/Italian/Jewish) is so different from the South (Scots-Irish/Welsh/English)? Or why both are very different from the Midwest (German with some Dutch and Scandinavian)? Or the significance of the fact that the "cowboy (Western) states" have all English founders—with names like Cody, James, Earp etc? Is white America perhaps more diverse than people think?

The persisting differences in values, mentality and voting patterns obviously still obtain in 2005, even eight generations after the first Kennedys, Cuomos, Shumers; Wallaces, Calhouns, (Bob) Joneses; Wagners (with Van Dykes and Swensens); and (Bill) Hickocks came to these huge and far-apart regions.

Few would deny that the Germans have long been one of the most important peoples in Western history, science, engineering, music, war and peace. (Incidentally, Germany has waged far fewer wars over the last 1,000 years than Britain or France.)

But few also realize that German (with Austrian/Swiss) is also the biggest ethnic heritage in the United States.

Even fewer white Americans or others realize that the English are a kind of "Germans"; that these two peoples, with the Dutch and Scandinavians, form one original Germanic language group; that they are all closely related to Kelts (Scots, Welsh, Irish etc) and Italic-speakers in language and culture as well as blood; that all Europeans (except the Basques of Spain, the Hungarians and Finns, and a few other small groups) speak what were once mere "dialects" (now tongues that have diverged so far that they are separate languages) of the same original language from the Bronze Age; that this one language and people spread, in the pre-Columbian era, from Ireland to Italy, and from Russia to Iran and India; and that despite World War II anti-German propaganda, this people actually did call themselves "Aryans," (hence Ire-land and Ir-an, and ar-istos, for the pure, noble Greek founding families, the "aristocracy").1

Let's start with the ancestors of today's 52 million German-Americans, in the so-called European Ur-heimat (pronounced Oo-r HI-mott).2

This German word is the scientific term used in all languages to designate where all the Aryans most probably once lived together, before they split apart around 3000 B.C., no doubt over a woman. (Seriously, their population probably grew too large for the area; game was hunted out etc, although personal squabbles could also have played a part in causing the original tribe to break up and move apart).3

The Proto-Aryans used gold and silver, and used verbs for yoke, weave and sew in their work. They drank a rather tasty honey-based "beer" called mead; worshiped multiple gods (of the sky/thunder, the Sun etc); and believed firmly in life after death, conducting elaborate funeral/burials. (Marija Gimbutas, The Beginning of the Bronze Age in Europe and the Indo-Europeans, 1973)

In their ur-homeland we can be virtually sure they had beech, apple, oak, linden (basswood), aspen (poplar), pine and ash trees; they knew the bear, wolf, turtle and salmon; and had clear concepts of what honey, snow, cold and winter were, because they had words for all these things, according to linguists who have attempted to reconstruct the original language by tracing back words still in use today.

For all these reasons, most experts believe the Aryans or Proto-Indo-Europeans came from Ukraine, or someplace near there, since they clearly could not have come from a place where beech trees did not grow, for example. Since 1492, Aryan languages (including Spanish, Portuguese, French, Russian and English, as well as many others) have spread over the whole planet, making Indo-European the dominant language family of the Earth.

* * *

The Slavs (especially Russians, Poles and Ukrainians), although warriors, stayed close to their ancestral homelands. Their languages are also fairly unchanged from the original tongue, today usually called "Indo-European" because (until the great European empires began in 1492) it stretched from India to Europe. Today, there are 280 million Slavic-speakers.

All Aryans or Indo-Europeans were Bronze and Iron Age warriors, often with war chariots, war horses, metal weapons, many sky and thunder gods (as well as goddesses), patriarchs and with one single word for snow that started as "snegwu" and ended up as simply "snu." Their leader was the "reg," or king, hence the later, derivative words "rex" or "regal" (in Latin), "rajah," (in Sanskrit), "rik" (in Keltic) and "Reich" (meaning kingdom, or country, in German).

Despite politically correct modern denials, the Aryans were undoubtedly white, no doubt evolving as a race in the Ice Age (and depigmented as are polar bears, white Siberian tigers and winter hares). Their European descendants are white, and their gods are even called blond and light-eyed (examples: blond Apollo and "gray-eyed Athena").

In The Republic, Plato said of the Athenians, "we call dark-haired men manly, and fair-haired ones the children of the gods." The Brahmans, the highest noble caste in India, were traditionally fairer than other Indians; today, in personal ads in Indian newspapers, women always mention if they are "light-complected." Northern Indians and modern Pakistanis, found in areas where Aryans settled in 1500 B.C., almost resemble central Italians.

To this day, European and American leaders are desired to have "chiseled Nordic features" (examples: Alexander the Great, John Kennedy, many Scandinavian kings). Princesses, in the popular imagination, are almost always blond or redheaded.

Unlike Slavs and Lithuanians, most Indo-Europeans used their war technology (metal weapons and "blitzkrieging" by horse and chariot) to travel very far away from the ur-home. The Persians or Iranians, who are not Arabs in nose, lips, hair, mentality or language, and who despise Arabs, think of themselves almost as isolated Europeans and, incidentally, love all things French. (But they and Iraqis are "hereditary enemies.") Famous for the peach (originally "persich"), the Persian people's country of Iran means "Aryanland," just as does the original name of India after the Aryans arrived there, "Aryavarta" (AryanEarth). Around 1500 B.C. the southern Aryans arrived in these countries after crossing the Caucasus and Afghan mountain ranges. The British who conquered India in the 1700s were thus "western Aryans" in an eastern Aryan country.

The Greeks (Achaeans, Hellenes) descended the Balkan lands from the Ur-Heimat also around 2000 B.C. to found Greece; Romans around this time descended into the Italian peninsula to found their civilization, which has left us both gladiator movies and the alphabet used in this article.

* * *

Kelts (k-l or g-l-named peoples) probably moved west first of all the western Aryans, already wearing kilts and tartans, blowing bagpipes, singing and drinking whiskey when they moved out of modern Czechoslovakia and conquered Gaul (now France), aided by bronze and iron weapons and an enjoyment of battle.3 Moving into northern Italy, the Kelts founded Milan and left many blue-eyed northern Italians behind. (They are often more blue-eyed and light-haired than many southern Germans.)

Wales (in French: "Galles"), Scotland, the Emerald Isle (where the so-called "black Irish" of the west coast are perhaps descended from the pre-Kelts), bagpiping northwestern Spain (Galicia), southern Germany and all of Austria, and a part of Asia Minor called "Galatia" (to which the apostle Paul sent a famous letter in the New Testament) all reflect the Keltic invasions. Kelts have the highest incidence of blue or green eyes and red hair and freckles of any group on Earth.4 (Mongolians and Ashkenazi Jews also can have these features, which has led to some speculation of slight Keltic admixture.)

Between the Romans and the Germanic peoples (especially Franks, Germans, Anglo-Saxons and Normans), sadly every Keltic region ended up under the rule of other, even more warlike Aryan peoples between 500 B.C. and A.D. 1600. In 1919, just before Ireland got its independence, there was not one sovereign Keltic country on the globe.5 But then neither do the Kurds, another Aryan group, have sovereignty, and they number about 20 million in population.

* * *

Narrowing things down quite a bit, we arrive at the Germanic peoples. They were called Teutons (Teut or Deut[sch] means "the people") or Gerr-mans (men of the "gerr," a very dangerous and accurate close-range short spear that was whipped with a strong wrist flick off a grooved shaft of wood while running forward). They moved from their snowy Urheimat to even more snow, into southern Sweden and Norway, up into southern Finland (where an Asian people, the Suomi, replaced their language with their Finno-Ugric Asian tongue), over into Denmark and into the northern half of Germany.6

The Germanics (Teutons) broke up into two groups, the Scandinavians (the future Vikings) in Denmark, Norway and Sweden, and the Germans (now split into Germany, the Germanic-dialect nation called Netherlands and the similar Flemish half of Belgium, German-speaking Austria and most of Switzerland; plus England (created by northern Germans from Angeln and Lower Saxony (home of recent chancellor Gerhard Schroeder), hence the Anglo-Saxons.

The Scandinavians tend to physically be classic, pure "Aryans" with narrow faces, high foreheads, blue or gray eyes and of course, in many cases, golden-blond hair. The Dutch and Flemish closely resemble them, as do the original northern Germans.

Slavic and other blood caused eastern Germans to sometimes have round faces and ash-blond, not golden-blond hair; Berlin, Leipzig and Dresden are all completely Slavic place names. However, the classic German face is square, with a strong jaw and a big build. American football is a sport in which Germans have excelled in the New World.7

Germans, despite American and British war propaganda, are just as commonly brown-, red- or black-haired as the English, with about 30 percent blondes. Roy Scherer (Rock Hudson) and Tom Selleck are typical husky brunet German-Americans, as are natural light brownettes Donna Reed (Mullenger) and Kim Basinger.

* * *

After A.D. 400 many Germanic peoples descended from the north and over the Rhine toward the hated enemy with the lovely climate, Rome. In any case, they were already in the Roman legions, often as generals. The Visi-(West)goths entered Spain, creating the modern Spanish aristocracy (with names like Alberto, Norberto, Eduardo and Sigismundo). The Ostro-(East)goths and Lombards ("Long Beards") entered Italy, leaving behind the Italian aristocracy with such names as Ludovico (Ludwig), Adalberto and even Adolfo.

The name of our country, "America," is the Latinized form of Amerigo (named for the Italian aristocrat Amerigo Vespucci who sailed to South America). Fifteen years after Columbus, in 1507, the name was invented and put on a map of both North and South America by the German scholar and professional cartographer Martin Waldseemueller. The name "Amerigo" was one of those Lombard Germanic names the northern Italian aristocracy passed on through the generations, from the Germanic Amal-rik, "work king" (meaning "extremely hard-working"). In Anglo-Saxon and modern English the name Emmeric has become Emory.

The major German tribe to settle (and endure for centuries) in France was the Franks (hence Frankfurt, Franconia in Germany), inventors of the hot dog or frankfurter (which French cuisine never adopted), the stirrup (which meant a mounted knight could wear heavy armor, carry a lance and take a big sword swing without falling into the mud) and many blue-eyed Frenchmen, a cross between the Franks and their native mistresses.

In records of Napoleon's military draft, 50 percent of French recruits had blue eyes. After he killed most of them, and Sicilians rushed in to replace them, then World War I happened, and Sicilians, Portuguese and Spanish replaced those casualties; the French are now 80 percent brown-eyed.

Ruling and speaking Old High German for 600 years, the Frankish aristocracy was much blonder and taller than the common people, and had names such as:

• Gerhard, which was Frenchified to Gerard; the Norman French carried it to England, where it became Jerry;

• Albert;

• Gwilhelm (>Guillaume >William >Will/Bill);

• Frank;

• Ludwig (>Louis); Dietrich (>Thierry >Terry);

• Adelheid ("noble heathen") (>Adelaide or Adelle); and

• Rupprecht, which the French called Robert (and pronounced Robe-air).

* * *

Interestingly, the current prime minister of France, nobleman Dominique de Villepin, is 6'4". Charles (<Frankish "Karl" meaning "manly") de Gaulle was 6'5". Their stature comes from the Franks.

Many of les Francs were wiped out in "the Terror" of the French Revolution, after an Abbot Sièyes ruled that the blondish aristocrats at Versailles were Germans. He said the Revolution was the Gauls rising up against the Teutonic barbarians.

Germans have lived in, of course, Germany for many millennia, and were never once conquered before 1945 (exactly as was the case for the Japanese until that year).

In the Middle Ages Germany was a relatively huge country, called (bizarrely) the "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation." (Voltaire joked that it was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire.)

The Religionskriege [religious wars] devastated Germany for 120 years, and only ended as the Thirty Years War expired (1618-1648). The French monarchs, descended ironically from the Franks, promoted continuous war in Germany after Luther's Reformation, using religion and bribes, selling weapons to all and even switching sides whenever one party was gaining the upper hand.

By the time of the Treaty of Westphalia, which settled the religious question by saying that each prince could dictate his own religion to the people, Germany had lost 20 percent of its population (the equivalent today of a limited nuclear war). Wolves entered the villages, eating corpses. The nation was smashed into 300 tiny kingdoms and principalities under a figurehead emperor [der Kaiser]. Switzerland, Alsace-Lorraine and Holland, extremely rich territories, were broken off completely. (Today, Austria has also been broken off, the country that ruled Germany for 600 years through the Hapsburgs.)

The first line of the Dutch national an them, which irritates Hollanders to this day, includes the words "ben ik, van Duitsen bloed" (usually translated to mean "I am of Ger man blood"). The Dutch are still obsessed with anger at German infantry—not for rape or pillage, which basically did not happen (the Dutch being viewed as family), but for stealing their bicycles in 1940 to zip faster into Belgium and France. (Every Dutchman and -woman will bring this up at the drop of a hat.) In fact, the most German-hating country in the world is not Israel but Holland: a case of two feuding brother countries.8

* * *

It has been suggested that the Germans have been a nationally "traumatized people" ever since 1618-48, their "Civil War," and that the further traumas of World War I (3 million dead) and the Weimar Republic (with its Versailles Treaty, inflation, mass unemployment and the rise of the German Communist Party) were what made them ripe for a seemingly strong, father-like leader and organizer like Hitler. The catastrophe of World War II, where Germans again lost 20 percent of their population and the country shrank by over a third, with millions of women repeatedly raped and with "Holocaust" accusations bombarding them daily from 1945 to the present (including on masochistic German state-owned television), have made the Germans the most insecure people on Earth in the sense of psychological trauma and lack of a healthy sense of national pride.

Having been decimated by neighboring France and by Germany's imported Christian religion's divisions, all Germans longed deeply after the Thirty Years War for the reunification of all the different German regions. Hence the phrase in the German national anthem from the 1830s by the poet Hoffmann Von Fallersleben, "Deutschland ueber alles." It means simply "the common German-land [should be preferred] over all [lands that are mere parts of Germany], and also over anything else [money, fame, foreign and special interests] in the world." The following lines make this clear, referring to the nation as being "from the Maas River" (near Holland) "to the Memel River" (on the border with Denmark), "from the Etsch River" (on the Italian border) "until the Belt River" (which borders Lithuania). It basically means, "one nation, indivisible."9

* * *

With France vigilant from 1648 on to prevent its powerful and hard-working neighbor from ever reuniting, Germans began to very reluctantly accept that one of the powerful, militaristic kingdoms in Germany would be the necessary evil able to re-establish "the union" (to use an American phrase), or in German the Reich. The Treaty of Westphalia was, for Germans, as if the Civil War in America had led to 300 different independent states by the grace of France. As late as 1960, a French foreign minister joked, with reference to communist East Germany and capitalist West Germany, "I love Germany so much I am glad there are two."

Interestingly, in 1943 nobleman Charles De Gaulle, awestruck after visiting the vast ruins of the battlefield of Stalingrad, said of the Germans to his Soviet hosts: "What a great people to have come this far!" Since 1959 French president, by 1963 he was a major advocate of French-German friendship.

Proof à la française of his change of heart: after signing the 1963 Elysée Palace Treaty in Paris10 proclaiming that bygones were bygones between the two nations, De Gaulle attempted a manly kiss and bear-hug with frosty Teutonic chancellor Konrad Adenauer. Adenauer's advisers saw their boss cringing and (as seen nearly off-camera in the newsreels) literally shoved him in the small of the back forward to at least accept a hug from the giant général who, having fought Germany in combat in both world wars, was now seeking to literally kiss and make up with the ennemi héréditaire.

France today works extremely closely with Germany, buys enormous amounts of German cars (but not wieners or sauerkraut), and rallied with Ger many to oppose George Bush the Second and his invasion of Iraq.)11

* * *

Despite this modern happy ending between la belle France and Deutschland, the 1648 catastrophe meant that a religiously and politically divided, impoverished "non-country" could never field a huge navy like those of Portugal, Spain, France or England during the great ages of European exploration and colonization. (Yet the northern Germans had once run a glorious and wealthy sea federation, the Hanseatic League, in the Middle Ages.) Nor, without an army, were the Germans able to acquire a huge land empire as did Russia and the United States in the 19th century, the one growing east toward the Pacific, the other west toward the Pacific. Hence there is no German-speaking country overseas, although Germany did have a few colonies in Africa.

Pure necessity thus destined that militaristic Prussia (where sergeants literally used whips on dawdling soldiers) should lead Germany after 1870—though only after throwing Austria, a more "normal" country, out of Germany.12 Interestingly, Adolf Hitler, an Austrian, preferred the blunt, precise, extremely disciplined and dutiful Prussians to his fellow Austrians until he realized that his blue-blooded northern German officers resented taking his proletarian Austrian orders and were surreptitiously sabotaging and delaying his blitzkrieg orders to deliberately make him fail. [Noted in Leon Degrelle's video Hitler's Blitzkrieg, Part One available from TBR Book Club. See page 84.]

In 1848 Prussia crushed the democratic revolution meeting at St. Paul's Church in Frankfurt and, by beating France in 1870, took over all of Germany, Prussianizing the whole country and especially army service. Germany began to lose millions of talented emigrants. That loss, however, became America's gain. (It is typical of Americans' lack of historical knowledge that they have no idea that Germans rose up for democracy in a nationwide movement, as had the Americans and French before them in 1776 and 1789, and as the French (again) and Hungarian masses were also doing in the year 1848, and that only 10,000 Prussian bayonets and firing squads in Frankfurt dispersed this fervently supported movement. The indirect proof that the tragedy occurred is the presence of millions of their descendants living in America today. The group as a whole that came here is called the "Forty-Eighters.")

Millions of Germans, many very educated, or at least highly skilled and generally law-abiding, and all politically moderate, would sail for a land where they would have lots of German-speaking company: organizations, churches, newspapers, choral societies (a German invention), bowling leagues and beer gardens, a happy time that lasted until WWI. Seven million Germans have arrived in Amerika between 1609 and 2005, mostly in the 19th century.

* * *

Of course, there were waves, minor waves, of German immigration before 1848. The English had wanted more colonists in the 13 frontier colonies of their North American empire, especially to hold the land against the French (up in Canada and down in Louisiana) and to fight Indians as "tomahawk fodder," all the while being model subjects.

The kings of England from the 1730s on have been Germans themselves (or of German blood) from the House of Hanover (named after the capital of Lower Saxony). Though no longer speaking German after the time of King George III (who lost America in the Revolution), the House of "Windsor" (so-called since World War I) is nearly 100 percent Protestant German.13 The motto on the coat of arms of the princes of Wales, the heirs to the throne, is "Ich dien," i.e., "I serve.")

As with their own English poor and African slaves, English ship captains treated German emigrants like subhumans. When 30,000 emigrants from the Palatinate (Rhineland) arrived in England for further transit in 1709, they were so poor and ragged that the English mocked them loudly. By the year 1710, fully 17,000 of the emigrants had died in England while still awaiting transit or during the six-week sea voyage.

In 1750 an emigrating German schoolteacher, Gottlieb Mittelberger, wrote: "During the voyage in the ships there arises every kind of horrific suffering: stench, steaming heat, vomiting, fever, diarrhea, headaches, constipation, tension, boils, cancers and dread of the crew in the dark decks below." The trips usually lasted six to eight weeks. The food was wretched, and often insufficient; complaints brought beatings. German writer Friedrich Kapp wrote something that African slaves would have understood; "If there were gravestones and crosses on the ocean waves, the route of the emigration ships would seem like one long cemetery."

On arriving, often in Philadelphia, the many who were destined to be indentured servants could not leave ship until their new owners took them. Frequently, their young children were separated from them to work in entirely different homes and workshops.

It was around 1710 that pious Mennonite refugees from German Switzerland, German Mennonites and Rhineland Huguenots (Protestant refugees from France now speaking German) began arriving in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania, where some moved farther west or south as Mennonites and others stayed and became the Amish. The "plain people" with their famous immaculate farms, volunteer barn-raisings for neighbors in need, beards and buggies were immortalized in the 1985 Oscar-winning film Witness (with Harrison Ford).

The Mennonites as pacifists had all suffered terrible religious persecution from authorities in the Rhineland and in Switzerland, insistent on drafting their men. Remembering the seemingly fierce full-face beards of the soldiers who arrested and massacred them, the Mennonites vowed that while beards were natural things from God, theirs would look more peaceful. Thus the cheeks are clean-shaven; it is a beard grown underneath the jaw. Interestingly, 75 percent of Old Order Amish children who take advantage of their "English year" to taste the outside world return to their electricity-, telephone- and television-free community. The Amish have now expanded to over 240,000 and moved into central Pennsylvania and Ohio.

By the 1750s Benjamin Franklin was both admiring the hard-working Mennonites and Amish and fearing they would overwhelm the English-Americans in Pennsylvania. That did not stop the plucky entrepreneur, however, from learning German himself and making a killing off his own German-language newspaper, Die Philadelphia-Zeitung. (Incidentally, it is a myth that German "almost became the official language of the U.S. after the Revolution," in a land that was still 90 percent of British stock. Pennsylvania did, however, consider publishing all laws in German.)

Other Mennonites spread south along the Appalachians, never buying or using slaves, hence not growing cotton in the flatlands below. They stuck to the Blue Ridge and small family farms and businesses, and were welcomed when they arrived as good neighbors. In 1734 there arrived the Silesians (eastern Germans) and Salzburg (Austria) Protestants, expelled from their homes by their Catholic Hapsburg monarch. Many went to Savannah, Georgia—at that time "eine pure Wildnis" (a complete wilderness) as they wrote back home in German. They were horrified at the slavery they found in Georgia (backed by the king) and the English mentality that they perceived as being "money is everything." But all of this was better than living under one of the 300 tyrannical mini-princes of the old country.

These first Germans, often humbled by abuse, and shy owing to lack of education and English-language skills, were initially at a business disadvantage compared to the English colonists. However, they immediately set to work mastering Englisch, starting bilingual schools or attending existing all-English schools, and enjoying their new right to protest corruption, crime and cruelty.

While the Acadian French, expelled from Canada to Louisiana in 1755-58 by the British (with 30 percent fatalities on the British ships), were pouring in as refugees along the Mississippi Delta, Germans were directly invited in by the gouverneur royal of Louisiana. He wrote back to Paris, pleased, that the Germans had set to work immediately draining the foulest mosquito and alligator swamps and making them arable land: "What we here call the 'German Coast' has the hardest-working, most prolific and honest part of the colony's population."

* * *

In 1733 German-American immigrant Johann Peter Zenger began publishing The New-York Weekly Journal in Manhattan to voice opposition to the onerous policies of newly appointed colonial governor William Cosby.

Upon his arrival in New York from England, Cosby had plunged into a rancorous quarrel with the Colonial Council over his salary demands. Unable to control the state's Supreme Court, he removed Chief Justice Lewis Morris, replacing him with James Delancey of the royal party. Supported by members of the popular party, Zenger continued to publish articles critical of the royal governor. Finally, Cosby issued a proclamation condemning the newspaper's "divers[e], scandalous, virulent, false and seditious reflections." On Sunday, November 17, 1734 Zenger was arrested and charged with seditious libel.

When Zenger protested that all his criticisms were demonstrably true (which was all that mattered for a blunt German, or for any patriotic American), the court ruled that, under English law, any truth was libelous that damaged the government and "respect for authority."

After more than eight months in prison, Zenger went to trial, defended by illustrious Philadelphia lawyer Andrew Hamilton. The newspaper-vs-royal governor case became a cause celebre in all the colonies. Rebuffed repeatedly by Chief Justice Delancey during the trial, Zenger's lawyer decided to plead his case directly to the jury. After the arguments for both sides were finished, the jury returned shortly—Zenger was not guilty. It was an early example of the power of "jury nullification"—the jury simply rejected the law as unjust.

In the February 25, 1733 issue of the New-York Weekly Journal, an article appeared by one "Cato," a pseudonym for a writer of Zenger's. This article gave its readers a preview of Zenger's position 18 months later fighting the government's libel case against him:

• "The exposing of Publick Wickedness, as it is a Duty which every Man owes to the Truth and his Country, can never be a Libel in the Nature of Things. . . .

• "To me there seems to be a set of Libels, full as Destructive as any of the others can be, I mean Libels against the People. . . .

• "Almost all over the Earth, the People for one Injury they do their Governors, receive Ten Thousand from them.

• "Nay, in some Countries it is made Death and Damnation, not to bear all the Oppression and Cruelties which Men, made Wanton by Power, inflict upon those who gave it to them."

Zenger's victory over the government prosecutor was one of the most important cases in the colonial period, leading directly to demands for a First Amendment and Bill of Rights for the U.S. Constitution in the 1790s: freedom of speech, of the press and religion, of gathering, of guns and of property owners. All were especially sacred concepts to German immigrant refugees of the day.

In 1733, Johann Roggenfelder arrived from the Rhineland. His descendants would become oil billionaires and politicians under the name "Rockefeller." Typical of some Germans of the time, the Roggenfelders had almost no pride in being German due on one hand to their country's sorry history since 1648 and the power of English-speakers on the other hand. They assimilated totally into a certain mentality among some American English of getting rich as quickly as possible, and covering it over with religion.

In 1740, on the other hand, Andreas Huber arrived in Frederick, Maryland, a German of the finest sort. His descendant Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) exemplified many German-American values such as humanitarianism, honesty, a moderate but definite religious faith (not holy-rolling, which was English and Scotch-Irish), thirst for education and hard work—but also a woeful lack of cunning, deviousness, ruthlessness and outright mendacity when faced with the likes of the governor of New York state, FDR.

Hoover was elected president of the United States of America in November, 1929, just days after the "Roaring Twenties"—of speculation and wild living he disapproved of—were followed by the October 29 stock market "Crash" which led to the Great Depression. He governed for only one desperate term, 1929-33, while the Federal Reserve actually tightened the money supply. When he died, at 90, his name was still being blackened during the reign of Roosevelt's protégé, Lyndon Johnson of Texas—by those who forgot what most Americans and all economic experts know, that it was the military buildup to World War II, not FDR's programs, that "saved" America from the Depression.14

* * *

When the American Revolution began, virtually all German-Americans (including the pacifists cheering anything that would increase freedom and weaken royal government) supported openly or clandestinely the onerous seven-year struggle.

This did not of course apply to the Hessians, libelously called "mercenaries." The king of Hanover had in effect "sold" some of his young subjects for the duration of the war to his cousin, the king of England, with nifty premiums if they were wounded and double premiums if they were killed. The men were not mercenaries in the sense of professional soldiers but conscripts, debtors or the victims of impressment. Far from being well paid like today's employees of Halliburton or "Blackwater," some Hessians received nothing but food for their service.

Needless to say, numerous Hessians did not distinguish themselves for bravery or deep love of monarchism. They frankly deserted whenever and wherever possible into the woodwork of Maryland and other states, and as soon as the British were gone married local girls and openly resumed life as farmers and skilled artisans. There is no doubt that if German-Americans still had an active lobby for their interests like the NAACP or the ADL, this "mercenary" slur would no longer be used against the ancestors of many modern Americans. (They did, but in 1917, during World War I hysteria, the German National Alliance, with its 2.5 million members in 45 states, was crushed.)

Nikolas Herchheimer (Herkimer), Revolutionary militia leader, had grandparents from Heidelberg. Hundreds of Palatine Germans had been worked as indentured servants along the Hudson, then were freed to settle in the Mohawk Valley, the frontier, as a buffer against the French and Indians. And so the Palatine Germans bore the full brunt of their attacks in the French and Indian War, where Herchheimer became a distinguished militia commander.

When the Revolution came, the feisty half-German-half-English-speaking Herkimer immediately joined the American cause, now against British, Tories and the same Indians. Commanding 800 men and boys, he became the "hero of the Mohawk Valley."

Promoted to brigadier general by George Washington, he prevented his militia from being annihilated in a joint Tory/Iroquois ambush at Oriskany Creek on August 6, 1777. Almost at the outset, Herkimer was seriously wounded in the leg, but he managed to keep command of his men-and-boys militia, which held its ground despite fierce hand-to-hand combat with heavy losses on both sides. For six hours, the bandaged, leg-blasted Herkimer sat on a saddle propped up against a tree and directed the militia while smoking a pipe to demonstrate his confidence in the outcome. The Americans retreated in good order with their numerous wounded; Herkimer died 10 days later due to a botched leg amputation. The survival of the upstate New York militia and of its morale was so critical to Washington's plans that the U.S. Navy commemorated the battle with an aircraft carrier, the USS Oriskany Creek (in service 1944-74).

A farmer's son in Germany, Johann Kalb, rose to become a distinguished general "De Kalb" in France. Sent by Versailles to check out the American Revolution, he joined it instead just before Valley Forge as a major general under Washington. Called "Baron" for his distinguished bearing (certainly not his farmer background), the morale-boosting Kalb commanded Delaware and Maryland troops, and then was sent south for the worst of the fighting in South Carolina, where, captured, he died of his wounds in 1780.

* * *

The greatest German-American by far during the Revolution—for symbolism, for morale and for his effect on the entire war—was without a doubt Gen. Friedrich Wilhelm Baron von Steuben, a Prussian officer whose magnificent 30-foot statue stands in Lafayette Park across from the north side of the White House.

It is both well-known and true that the young Frenchman, the marquis de Lafayette, entered American revolutionary history as a fighter, as a son-like figure to the childless Washington, and as a first-rate "nagger" to his French king (the later doomed Louis XVI) to give the Americans more money, troops and naval support.

But Baron von Steuben was Washington's true right-hand man—from Valley Forge to final victory in the Revolution at Yorktown, where he generaled Washington's army's right wing. (Lafayette commanded the left.)

Von Steuben's key contributions were classically German: military discipline for the troops and endless training to perfection in marching, firing, and hygiene in the field. The unruly, freedom-loving Americans of English, Scottish and Scotch-Irish descent had done very well as snipers, Indian fighters and guerrillas, but not nearly as well as standup soldiers, on the open battlefield, facing the British empire's professional troops. Any American who has served in uniform or commanded troops, and knows our national character, can see that strict discipline must be instilled in most American recruits; it does not come naturally from the home.

Crossing the Atlantic at his own expense from Berlin and landing in 1775 in Ports mouth, New Hampshire, von Steuben raced by coach and horse through northern New England and down through upstate New York, avoiding British troops to get to Valley Forge, Pennsylvania. The Continental Army was slowly collapsing, unpaid, freezing, almost without medicine and dejected (to a large extent due to the repeated negligence of the Congress).

When von Steuben arrived, Washing ton had been giving a moving yet pathetic speech to his officers and men against desertion, even pulling his spectacles out of his pocket for effect, revealing that "My eyes have grown dim in the service of my country." Von Steuben presented himself in French (not speaking English), and proposed forthrightly that he become the new drillmaster and inspector general for the whole Continental Army.

Writing a manual of arms, called The Blue Book, and cursing at the dispirited troops in every language he knew when they returned to bad habits, the baron instilled new backbone, pride and courage into the soldiers—who needed to march exactly when and where told, load, fire and reload in precise sequence (so there would be sustained fire and no lulls), advance, turn and retreat as instructed, change their bandages, and clean their weapons, equipment, uniforms and bodies.

* * *

The idealistic Prussian got the American volunteers believing in themselves as soldaten, proud to instantly obey their officers— many of whom, in supreme dedication, had moved their families in with relatives and sold their farms to pay their men.

As a veteran U.S. Navy commander remarked to the author, Washington was never known as a great general.15 His greatness was in keeping his fighting force intact and "in the field" for seven excruciating, depressing years (1775-81), underpaid and underfunded, occasionally out fought, with Tories and spies all about, until the British, beaten at Yorktown with French aid, gave up—even more exhausted, financially and morally, than the Americans.

But the Virginia planter could not have prevailed in the end without army discipline and the prestige of winning at least some of his pitched battles. Friedrich von Steuben, by helping him build and maintain that discipline, stem desertion, and get the troops to make a decent showing in battles, helped Washington's army "stay in the field."

This, together with Steuben's commanding of the right wing of the Continental Army at Yorktown, the decisive final battle of the Revolution (October 19, 1781), made this German officer immigrant ultimately co-responsible, by any definition, for the existence today of the United States.

While naming a ballistic missile submarine as the USS Von Steuben (active 1963-1994) was a nice tribute to a man who, 182 years before, had given all for his new country, it was abysmally belated.

There was also a troop transport ship by the same name in World War I, actually a German passenger liner the Woodrow Wilson administration had interned in 1915, two years before America even entered the war (that the Calvinist English-American had promised to keep us out of). Used, ironically, to ship Americans off to fight Germans during 1917-1919, it was sold for scrap metal in 1923.

The fact that Gen. von Steuben's $10,000 pension was never paid him by Congress except in worthless paper, and in land he consequently could not afford to develop, and that the nobleman from afar died in near poverty in the country he had helped save, foreshadowed a schism that would increasingly mar the sunny American future: German- and English-Americans, for all their similarities, did not always have the same values.

And while most Americans (including many English and all Scottish, Welsh, Irish and French Americans, and Catholics) felt after Yorktown that the cleanest break possible with Britain would aid a bright future, there also were intensely pro-British English- Americans. They favored British interests and mentality more and more, especially as non-English immigrants began pouring into the new land. In turn the British would favor them; they would meet and dine over champagne in the same ocean liners. Soon Zionist interests would enter in, creating an alliance triangle. These billionaire "modern Tories" would prove less and less comfortable with the German-Americans.

The German-Americans would come to outnumber the English element as early as 1890; they began to co-build the modern United States with the English and other Americans; they would add many of the traits that have made America renowned until now; and they would collide with an unseen empire that their lack of deviousness would not permit them to defeat.

[In Defense of the White Race]

In Defense of the White Race
by Reverend Matt Hayhow

In Defense of the White Race

Every White Racial Loyalist group has adherents who believe guerrilla war/terrorist actions are the way to pursue White Victory.  Even our Founder, Ben Klassen, predicted such action might become necessary before all was said and done.  The lessons of history and the current state of our people undoubtedly support this belief.  Yet, such a significant decision—adopting armed resistance against the J.O.G.—cannot be based on emotion, "heroic" fantasies or youthful impatience.  Instead, it should be as a result of necessity and strategic planning.  As the great German military theorist Clausewitz once said, "War is a continuation of policy by other means."  Violence is the last resort.  We can't honestly or logically reach the conclusion that the time for organized violence is now, when no past pro-White group has ever had a sound program for our people nor ever adequately spread the word to our White Racial Comrades.  In the past, White Loyalists have half-heartedly 'preached to the choir', jumped like rats from sinking ship to sinking ship and taken no for an answer (to use a few clichés!).

Part of the problem was no serious and fully explained program existed—when the going got hot, pro-White activists had no moral foundation to support them and urge them on through the trials and tribulations.  Another contributor to this history of chaos, fratricidal warfare and ineffectiveness was the overweening hubris of slimy and ambitious publisher-"leaders". Their sole concern has been, not White survival, but personal power.  Both of these factors have resulted in "leaders" guided by the whims of their members, and members like spoiled children who 'take their balls and go home' at the first sign of discipline or hard work.  These "leaders" compete with each other for the few shekels they can squeeze from the miserly "pro-White" ship-jumpers by telling them what they want to hear, instead of what is truly needed for the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of Nature's Finest Creation.  This 'democratic' toadying to flighty mugwumps has hamstrung efforts to successfully spread our Ideals and made it seem as if it's impossible to awaken our White Racial Comrades.

We Creators do not accept any theory as a "given."  We should not believe that, "We've tried to awaken our people for 50 years and it hasn't worked, so terrorism is the only answer," for in truth, no one really has tried.  Until Creativity, no Racial Idea or party has been wholly based on the realities of the world, has totally reevaluated White Values, nor, most significantly, energetically propagandized the millions of our White Racial Comrades who are barely familiar with our motives and goals.  Only Creativity attacks the root causes of our people's, our society's, and our world's deterioration, and only Creativity has a solid program of propagandizing, proselytizing, and organizing, of putting ten million White Man's Bible's into the hands of our White Racial Comrades to build the foundation for a Whiter and Brighter World!

These reasons, among others, make an offensive strategy of violent, armed resistance to the Jewish Occupation Government (J.O.G.) premature.  Once we have made every effort to awaken our White Racial Comrades and all means for legal ideological resistance to the Jewish vomit spewed by the media, government, and churches are denied us—then will come the time to "continue our policy by other means," but surrendering the battle for the minds of our people before it's hardly begun is no way to prove the truth and merit of our Creed or our own ability to lead our people to a White Heaven on Earth.  Our strategy is to first win the propaganda war.  That can be done with a combination of offensive and defensive tactics.  Attack the lies, misconceptions, and propaganda which cloud White minds while building and maintaining a firm and resilient physical/moral defense against the counterattacks we are bound to encounter.  For, as Creativity gains acceptance, we can expect Morris Dees, dirty Harry Covington, and other minions of the J.O.G. to do their utmost to eliminate the threat to their continued hegemony.

So what can we do to forward Creativity and protect our Church from the quasi-legal and downright illegal attacks of our foes until we have either won the hearts and minds of our White Racial Comrades or are forced to resort to Nature's Highest Law, the Law of Survival?  We need only look to history and the principles of Creativity for the perfect tactics.  "Fortune favors the prepared mind."—Louis Pasteur  Such disparate groups as scientists, priests, soldiers, and the Boy Scouts study and train to prepare for their futures.  Even animals are taught to defend, hunt, etc. by their parents.  It is important for The World Church of the Creator and we Creators to prepare for ours.  Part of this preparation is to be ready for probable future obstacles.  Judging from our past and the past experiences of groups such as the Ku Klux Klan, the American Nazi Party, and Hitler's National Socialists, we can expect to face slander, physical attacks, and "legal" assaults.  The slander will come from the media and other J.O.G. minions, from FBI infiltration-agitation campaigns, and even from envious racial "allies."  Physical attacks are likely to be formented by Jews and carried out by gangs (SHARP, muds, the JDL, etc.).  We can also expect civil suits by men like Morris Dees and criminal cases against Creators by the Jewstice Dept.—usually based on the efforts of agent-provocateurs, the lies of traitors and/or the "cooperation" of the fearful.

These are by no means the only impediments we face in our quest to build a Whiter and Brighter World for our people.  We will most definitely confront poisoned and obstinate minds, the masses destruction program of the media, and the suicidal prattle of Christians, but these obstructions can and will be overcome by assiduously promoting our Creed to our racial kin.  This offense-oriented plan of The World Church of the Creator has already been well-explained and illustrated by our Founder Ben Klassen, P.M.Matt Hale, and many other Creators.  In the battle for the minds of our people, we are on the offensive, and this will be the cause of the attacks described above.  From its past record, we know the J.O.G. will try to destroy any menace to its power before it becomes a serious threat.  As a result, our program is to construct a solid organizational foundation so we may continue our propagandizing, proselytizing, and organizing with little or no interruption when the J.O.G. turns from its dismantling of the Militia and Identity "movements" and focuses on us.

Creativity is already better prepared to meet our enemies than any pro-White organization before.  It has a sound ideology based on our Three Basic Books.  This has already enabled us to do something very few have been able to accomplish-to survive the death of our Founder, agent-provocateurs, Morris Dees, and treachery at the top.  If we look deeper into the writings of Ben Klassen and other Creators, we will find further plans for a steadfast defense from the malignant forces of the J.O.G.  Let's review five of these strategies in order to prepare ourselves and The World Church of the Creator—the only realistic hope for the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of the White Race.

1) A Solid Foundation.  Creativity is a way of life based on the Laws of Nature, the Lessons of History, and Logic and Common Sense.  There is no compromising these facts of life.  Creativity, unlike Christianity, is not open to distortion or argument, and is clearly elucidated in our many books.  Christianity's contradictory and nebulous Bible, on the other hand, allows different people(s) to interpret its teachings in myriad ways (usually the easy way).  It is impossible to rely on such a vacillating moral foundation.  Contrarily, Creativity's well-defined stand for the White Race and basis in reality made possible our rapid reformation and election of a new Pontifex Maximus after the tribulations of the early '90s.  Easterners and Westerners; urbanites and the rural born; skinheads, collegians, and our elders all overcame hubris and dissension because they had a distinct program and concrete system of values to rally around.  Our Holy Creed is the primary bulwark against J.O.G. aggression, but walls alone do not make a home—it also takes the labor of energetic and able craftsmen.

2) Propagandizing, Proselytizing, and Organizing.  Creativity's program of propagandizing, proselytizing, and organizing was—and still is—a large contributing factor to the survival and growth of the World Church of the Creator.  P.M.Klassen's tactic of copiously distributing our literature and "Brain Bombs" (our Books) worked well.  To this day, folks who found a discarded White Man's Bible or were handed a Nature's Eternal Religion years ago are coming forward to work with us.  Our continuing missionary-like efforts, though they may seem less glorious than gun battles, are the true guarantor of White Victory.  The wider our dissemination of Creative Ideals, the harder it is for J.O.G. thought-police to erase them.

3) Polarization and Dispersion.  The third aspect of our defense, too, has been written of by our Founder.  Before his passing, P.M.Klassen not only foresaw the need to polarize people around one concrete and all-encompassing belief, but also to disperse Creativity's adherents and resources.  Polarization and Dispersion is partially explained in #1 above and fully elucidated throughout our books.  Dispersion of our leaders, members and resources, all polarized around Creativity, makes the J.O.G.'s efforts to thwart us difficult, if not impossible.  Take out the P.M. and he is replaced by another.  Destroy a church group and the fight goes on.

4) The Leadership Principle and Primary Groups.  Another facet of our defense is Creativity's recognition and support for men and women of ability—The Leadership Principle. It is a basic principle of Nature and Nature's Eternal Religion that the best lead.  Free-lance leaders, like those encouraged by Beam's "Leaderless Resistance," can make gains, but that is the exception rather than the rule.  The program of The World Church of the Creator, on the contrary, is Leaderful Resistance, ala the Primary Group System.  In our case, it is more small church groups than actual primary groups, but the benefits and results are similar, and as these church groups grow it is a small thing to, if needed, break them into the more facile work groups proposed by Rev. Wolf.  In the Primary Group System, a leader starts small and, as he gains experience and hones his abilities, rises to more responsibility.  He is focused by the directives of the experienced leaders above and so is not continually repeating the mistakes committed by those who have gone before, as so often happens in the "Leaderless Resistance" "cells."  A further benefit of the Primary Group-type organization is its training of men and women to become effective leaders.  This ensures a large pool of capable stewards from which to pick should any fall prey to J.O.G. attacks, but most importantly, all of this means a church group's victories, large or small, are not isolated incidents-they are part of an organized and orchestrated campaign for the noblest of goals-the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of our precious White Race.  They are not flashes in a pan, but the first flicker in the dark night heralding the rise of the Creative Phoenix.

5) Tenacious Loyalty and Iron Determination.  The final defenses against our enemies, the ones which drive men like Morris Dees and Harold Covington to fits of impotent rage and support every form of resistance above, are tenacious loyalty and iron determination.  Our religion, Creativity, is not just some political lip-service or stop-gap solution, but our lives and the lives of our children.  It is the embodiment of our White Racial instincts and the result of thousands of years of learning.  It is the manifestation of our natural drive to survive.  Such an elemental desire fittingly results in a fanatical zeal and a rock-solid loyalty to the instrument of White salvation: Creativity and The World Church of the Creator.  These two traits are alien to our opposites.  Creativity is a religion unlike any other.  It is a Promethean Creed—an ideology of forethought. Our strategy for defense, like Salubrious Living, is based on prevention.  In Salubrious Living, we eat well and exercise to enable our bodies to combat disease and to prevent sickness from getting a hold of us.  With a Creative defensive strategy, we protect our Church and our Race from the poison of Jewish influence by making them strong enough to resist.  We take constructive action and learn and prepare in order to limit the harmful effects of the physical and mental impediments we are bound to encounter as we grow, the same as the wolfpup is prepared for life by the "teachings" and training of older wolves, his own efforts and experiences, and his natural instincts.

One final point.  The World Church of the Creator's long-term goal is the Survival, Expansion, and Advancement of the White Race, and I do mean long-term.  The Revolution of Values will not happen overnight.  No revolution ever has.  Rushing out to confront the Beast eagerly but ill-prepared is not effective or productive.  Believe me, I know.  Channel your zeal into constructive pursuits such as increased propagandizing, physical training, or courses in marketing, desk-top publishing, or anything you can learn to benefit yourself and in turn, the White Race.  Short-term goals are like the steps on a ladder—keep on completing every step and soon you'll have reached the top.  There is no limit to how high you and we can go.

RAHOWA!