Main Menu
• Shortened Link: W23.link » CreativityAlliance.com
• Beat the Censors on Social Media with ᵂ23 ᴰᴼᵀ ᴸᴵᴺᴷ
• Free @Rev.JoelDufresne P.O.W. USA - Prison Martyr - Bogus Charges
• Free @JamesCostello P.O.W. UK - 5 Years for Anti-Immigration Stickers
Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Albert

#6
my corrections pages 100-200
1, page 104. 10 th line down  should be "raise up seed by thy brother"
2, page 104 13 th line down a gap is needed "slew Onan"
3,page 115 end of 1st paragraph of Isaac.. has a superflous "a" about anything
4,page 126 1st line should be "Testament, we are"
5, page 144 paragraph 2 should be "you are right or wrong"
6, page 158 1st paragraph last sentence should be "hepped up Hollywood"
7,page 159 15th line down should be "but just give a scattered sampling"
8, page 160 14th line down should be " to scorch men with fire"
9, page 160 2nd to last line should be " inflicted"
10, page 171 6th paragraph should be " evidence will find that its"
11, page 172 3rd paragraph  Tarsus should have a capital "T" because it is a place. "Saul born in Tarsus"
12, page 172 line 20/21 should say "all of them were Jews"
13, page 175 bottom line should be " because they wished to"
14, page 178 paragraph 2 needs a hyphen  "Jesus Christ, the Son of God- this idea,"
15 page 180 lines 3/4 should read "one lie parlayed"
16, page 180 paragraph 2 should be "that he is psychologically browbeaten"
17, page 181 paragraph 4 should read " the Lords's whole plan for the human race changed"
18,page 183  third line has a superfluous "s"
19,page 183 2nd to last paragraph should read " the whole idea of "he died for our sins"
20, page 184 last line should be " overwhelmingly about Jews"
21, page 187 paras 3/4 have an unnecessary gap. "that this presumption"
22, page 198 last line of paragraph 2  should read "of the whole universe by Zion"


phew! hard work but worth it. We have to get this right for future generations of the White Race.
#7
My notes so far are that I still think that the bit "1st part of the White Mans Bible" is confusing...and should maybe be on the back..or maybe changed to the 1st creator Holy Book. Whatever..I personally despise the word "Bible"..in most peoples eyes it is synonymous with christianity.
on page 4 last paragraph should read "in" all eternity
on page 22 first paragraph "equalled" should have two "l"s
on page 32 fourth paragraph should read "modern" artists as opposed to modem
on page 64 in the last paragraph it should just read " and perhaps excelled by the jewish controlled television industry..."
page 80 point 7 should be two "l"s in equalled today
on page 97 last line our manifest desiny is spaced strangely
on page 98 point 6 and the cojoined paragraph are spaced incorrectly to the first printing.


All in all the errors are indeed trivial  in these first 100 pages and only the use of "modem" alters any religious interpretation.


Rereading NER again I do notice some things that are in fact not correct, noticeably when he says "elephants have no teeth at all" on page 7. That the Nile delta culture was more advanced in Egypt (p29) and the dates of Hyksos occupation (p75.) This is of no actual consequence because Ben Klassen was telling a tale to a readership in 1973. His specific goal was inculcating a sense of Race History and Natural law and codifying it as a Religion to save the White Race. He was neither an archaeologist nor zoologist but a layman and founder of a Religious world view. Any error was simply because he was a human being and not a god. What we creators insist on is that he be understood and respected, honored and defended as the founder of our Religion. And that his words be preserved on principle so that our people can prevail.


So far. many salutations, thanks and hails to PM Cailen for all the hard work..will post the next 100 pages soon.
#8
I apologise for the delay in my proof reading. I have been really sick of the whole subject after reading NER probably 50 times over the years I am just numb to it. It is perhaps though the greatest of the Creativity Religious Holy Books and that is why I have been so precious about it. I have just checked the first 100 pages.. as these are critical in giving a good impression of our Credo. My first reading is that it is an excellent rendition and so far has my seal of approval as a "Guardian of the faith" and a Reverend ordained by Ben Klassen.
          Bear in mind that printing a near perfect copy of the first Creator Holy Book has to be the absolute crowning glory of any Creator for which history and the White race will be grateful. It simultaneously spits in the face of our enemies and overturns the attacks by the US government in burning , pulping and burying our books. It overturns the foul deeds of traitors selling our Holy Books, of degenerates abusing our books and the cruel US government incarcerating our fellow Creators.
#9
Woah, Cailen. I have never criticised yourself or said anything about you that was negative nor do I believe I have criticised any other Creator, simply because that is not my personality. I just don't think personal criticism is constructive. I am a school teacher with a BA degree in advertising and have to protect my professional status. I don't criticise a student but ask them to alter their strategy or effort.
Now I have been frustrated at times with slow progress by some or obstinacy. If a person isn't going to listen there becomes no point communicating.
Lets put it another  way. I don't need to read the pdfs. I have faith that you will do what is best for Creativity. However there is one condition. That Creativity be inviolable. This is a religious stipulation that gives religions their credibility and credentials. a Religion is supposed to be unchanging to the letter  (fair enough if Ben Klassen used Canadian English- I'm not complaining about words like niggerization)
Also the use of the word "Bible" is if anything confusing because Bible in most peoples minds  specifically conjures up Christianity. Using the title "White Mans bible" makes ppl think we are Christian and time and time again this confusion remains so much so that people then leap to the catastrophic thinking that  Christianity is "the white Mans bible".
If anything it is bad advertising and confuses the buyer because in advertising you have a millisecond to convince someone of your product. For me "Natures Eternal religion" says essentially what it is on the cover..a person will therefore open it and have their predjudice confirmed and then their mind can absorb the Religion.
On the other hand "The white Mans Bible" is bought by ppl thinking they are getting an analysis of why Christianity is a "White" religion only to see it is initially about farming and diet ( a big turn off).
Now i don't suggest that WMB have its title changed because our religion should be invioable. I am saying the original titles be kept large  but any thing else written in inferior text.
#10
I am now returned to the forum because I have been informed the books are being reprinted with corrections. Needless to say it will take me some time to get through the pdfs. My first question is why do we have to do it via pdf? There exists the technology now to simply scan the original 1973 of  Natures Eternal Religion as it was intended to be seen.


The principle for me regarding any reprinting must be that Creativity is unalterable (i.e unalterable to the letter). Afterall, if any tinkering occurs- then what is to stop further tinkering in the centuries ahead until, like Christianity, it is a completely different "animal" from what was originally intended.
Tinkering is very dangerous and  leads to the potentiality for schism and argument a thousand years from now.... with the possibility of consequent wars and slaughter that have plagued catholic/ protestant divide.
Likewise the Sunni/shia divide. (Note that the slaughter between Shia and Sunni simply stems from who should have be Mohammeds successor; his son in law or his loyal friend.


In my view Creativity was and is perfect. The covers, the subsequent corrections made by Ben Klassen  for the second edition are legitimate also. I agree that any new edition may contain page footnotes for clarity but the original text and spelling (unless an obvious error) must be regarded as sacred, Holy and unalterable.
 
 
Church Links Holy Books W.R.L. Friends Holoco$t Links
 

Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]
 
The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]



Creator Origins
Church of the Creator: Founded by Ben Klassen - Year Zero (1973CE)
Your Own Creator Forum: Continuously Online Since 25AC (1998CE)
Creativity Alliance & Church of Creativity: Founded 30AC (2003CE)
Links: The History of Creativity | The Creator Calendar Explained
» Save the White Race - Join the Church of Creativity «

23 Words
What is good for the White Race is of the Highest Virtue;
What is bad for the White Race is the Ultimate Sin.


Main Website   Forum RSS Feed   Send Mail   About Us
Copyright © 30 AC - AC (2003 CE - CE), Creativity Alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Back to the Top