Messages

I agree with Rev Albert on this.  From a perspective of "what is best for the White race" we can view the issue of human contribution to climate change as being the developing world being the big problem.  The White race would be able to continue to enjoy technology and develop "green" alternatives but this is all hampered by the two problems of the tolerance towards the non-White world continuing to pollute the planet as well as the problem of certain financial vested interests in continuing to use oil and fossil fuels generally.

Stopping the oil companies and the developing world would be in our collective racial advantage and it just so happens that the science and the morality is also weighted heavily towards that side.

Great post Ian 
My brother and his wife will not have children but always put the dog's name down on greetings cards.

If another species is "one of the family" then that would suggest adopting another race would not be out of the question as well.

The issue is childless adults having dogs.  No way I would want to get my kids thinking they want a dog even before they have started a family.  And I would really worry that the dog replaced a kid even if they had one after that - let alone that it would maim the children.

 In the UK there are over 8 million pet dogs and barely that number of children aged 10 or under.
In the UK the Islamic newcomers shun dog ownership, as do non-White immigrants generally, and so are responsible for a drop in per capita dog ownership but increase in numbers of children.
When you know nothing more about a person than that they are a White European aged 25 you can take a bet they more likely have dogs than children.
Dogs are expensive, cramp your lifestyle and so on in the ways that typically the "child free" race traitor women – who will also often own cats and treat them as their babies – tell you makes them avoid childbearing.
The toxocara worms from dogs and cats cause human birth defects and blindness in children.  Dogs are often a danger to children and parents who take their children out for a walk inevitably have daily encounters with dog defecation and dogs bounding up barking or putting their mouths and paws on the children.
A man or a woman with a dog severely reduces their chances of meeting up with a potential mate who wants to start a family OF HUMANS.  But I think my Chinese flat-mate was onto something when she said she thinks women "sleep with" their dogs in more ways than one in a lot of cases. Of course her people would rather put them into their meals.
Some will object, saying that many families include a dog.  True but that does not negate my points. They have on average fewer children and set those kids up to repeat the degenerate pattern of behaviour.  It is a good indicator that the family is dysfunctional in some way and the mentality that an alien species is one of your family is an attitude that carries on into lack of racial awareness.
It is truly sick when pets are regarded as baby substitutes.  Often they are included as if they were people on greetings cards for example or they actually sleep in the same bed as the owner.
http://creativityreligionresourcecentre.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/confused.jpg

The survey said children who live in mixed neighbourhoods are often free of hostility towards other racial groups.

Somehow I can't imagine non-Whites are free of hostility towards other racial groups, especially resentment towards Whites which is not only instinctive but encouraged by the anti-racist, anti-White education system.

But what if the sentence had said:

"The survey said WHITE children who live in mixed neighbourhoods are often free of hostility towards other racial groups".  It would have demonstrated the agenda.