Drop the List

[Mikey]

oh I forgot to mention a few years ago the IKA was raided and the first thing they confiscated was membership lists

so yeah, lists lying around is a bad idea

[Chuck]

"It is the work and objective of the Church of the Creator...to Arouse, Unite and Organize the White Race and wrench control of our destiny back into our own hands." -Ben Klassen, Founder of the Creativity religion.

A Creator's objective is to organize his Race.

I don't disagree with either of these points.

The premise that we will accept low quality people into sensitive positions is faulty, if we maintain demanding standards.

The intention of the article is to get people to think critically about how to organize better in the future and act smarter than in the past.  The lazy, faulty approach of the past is to generate a membership list and start collecting dues.  This is the old-school approach and it simply doesn't work.

Think of it like this: the goal is to get somewhere beyond the limitations of merely fooling around with paperwork and membership lists on the one hand, but take what we can use from Terrible Tommy's "Leaderless Resistance" approach and apply that to our Faith.  

Another thought:  What is lost by telling the people that just want to "join a club" to go elsewhere? Nothing.  The "hangers-on" leave and we have better quality to show for it.  Quality over quantity, any day of the week.

To me that paragraph you quoted suggests we have something to hide in our strong beliefs. We do not. There is no hidden agenda.  Our goals and program are laid out in no uncertain terms, repeatedly.

We intend to organize the Race, which requires careful organization.

Indeed, which is why it's past time to drop the old approaches that don't work.  The old Church was too big of a battleship that just kept getting sunk time and again, either from internal issues or external attacks.  When we shore up the defenses a little bit, drop the paperwork, and try again with a slightly different tactical approach, it will make for smoother sailing.  A slightly more cellular approach means that problems and problem people - like the Jon Fox's of the world - are more easily isolated and contained.

Nobody says we shouldn't have a main spokesman, general fund, central book depot, Reverendship and associated testing, etc.  All that is being said is that until further notice, the membership approach is dropped, if for no other reason than it becomes its own reason for existence eventually.  The organization of the Church - as distinct from the Faith itself - will become slightly flatter and more cellular in structure.  But the core idea of trying to awaken the White man remains the same, nay, that cardinal focus becomes stronger because we don't have other organizational headaches getting in the way.

Neither should any restriction be placed on acting and proselytizing as we see fit, as long as it is reasonable and sane.  We will each work with our own strengths and preferences or act in small groups and time and numbers dictate.

Even with the best of the old-style member groups and social clubs, things become so degraded over time that paperwork and dues become the central focus.  This approach will freshen things up for a little while.

[Rev.Cambeul]

One thing our current system has put a stop to is the idea that we must be based in a particular area as a kind of headquarters. That if you are outside that particular area, you have no say in how The Church should go about its various activities.

Also, we do have organisation: All I need to do is maintain contact with the key Primary Group leaders, who maintain contact with their own people, and so on down the chain. No need for me to write down names and addresses, we all have a contact who has a contact, so that contact can be maintained.

Do the Catholic or Anglican churches keep a database of exactly where each of their parishioners live? Certainly not at their "HQ." They have no requirement for a membership list. Such lists for us are a weakness that we do not need. We are based on Primary Groups who are each responsible for their own actions. No longer will a "HQ" be blamed for the actions of an individual, and we no longer need worry about demands from the JOG about handing over membership lists, as there are none.

@Cailen.

[DregHunter]

This is disinformation period.  Everyone is already on a list.  You're either a gentile or a jew and gentiles who are too chickenshit to publicly announce they know the difference are not only cowards, they're traitors.  People don't go to jail for joining groups.  Uniting with others in groups is the only way to defeat the enemy.  No unity, no win.  Jews are extremely well united, how about you?

[VanDamme]

In "Natures Eternal Religion" Ben Klassen explains how the Jews use the "Kehillah" to organise themselves. It is an ancient and effective method of maintaining contact, directing ideas, funds, etc etc. Planning strikes, wars, propaganda etc etc. It is a perfectly sensible system to emulate and imitate for Creators. The Jews in the "Kehillah" only need to know the seven contacts to transmit instructions etc. whilst we Creators have not the numbers to effectively match the tried and tested Jewish system we do have a comparable organisation in embryonic form. We all know half a dozen other racial loyalists at least to keep our people on the true path.

[Grimm]

I think I'm just going to make something weird up and hand out a bunch of honorary memberships. It sounds vague and clean enough to avoid a lot of initial scrutiny.