2013-08-00 N.D., USA - Craig Cobb Hounded by Village of the Damned

[Grimm]

Bought straight out. Thirteen homes. Perfectly legal in that town until  they changed the laws with Craig.

Could someone arrange where we can make use of it (Basic lodging, food plant gardening) in exchange for the occupants taking care of the lawn and making sure his houses don't get vandalized.

Maybe they could even arrange to pay for the property taxes and fix stuff up if they can make it work.

If he is not contactable, maybe it would be possible to just use it and hope he doesn't press charges once he gets out. Think about it, he wanted white folks living in them shacks anyway and he needs the upkeep.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Nothing wrong with what he did! He is giving it a go. Sometimes there are people that scream out for change but do nothing. Then when someone does do something they just grizzle that his way isn't their way and therefore the guy sucks.

It isn't he who did anything wrong, the county is trying to say he "intimidated people" and then they "charge stack him" with multiple charges worded ambiguously to mean the same thing. He and his mate had rifles.. they didn't brandish them, they just had them exposed.
Or course you'd want a deterant! a circus comes and protests, vandals come, people murder their pets, just plain harassment.

Personally I think the way Kynan conducts himself is a little bit loud and "school yard" but different strokes for different folks, he is a white man with a white family giving it a go. I'd still like to meet them all at least.

[Rev.Cambeul]

The reason for asking these questions is simply. I know from talking to people as well as postings on the site. People out there are torn between thinking good on you for giving it a go. And he is a idiot for doing things this way.

And because he wears the Church's shirt etc, he must be getting a lot of publicity for us. But that may put us in the firing line when the * hits the fan.

Yes, good on Reverend Cobb for giving it a go. It's just a pity his methods were ... unsatisfactory. And it is a shame that he allowed himself to led on a merry song and dance in the media; but as I said before, Reverend Cobb is not a Member of our Church.

Some background: The Creativity Alliance has a blanket ban on interviews with the media. Although there are circumstances that the ban can and has been been waived, it is rare. What Hate Groups Say About Being Called Hate Groups https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,7227.0.html FYI The Murdoch press also has a blanket ban of their own on interviews with our Church Members and Supporters within Australia - but they will interview any idiot who claims to be a Creator, is not with our Church and is ready to perform in the stereotypical Hollywood style that the media desires. Considering the international perspective of today's media, I would be very surprised to find that this ban has not spread to Britain and America. The reason for the two bans is basically the same: Our Church Members and Supporters do not sing and dance to the tune of the globalist buffoons of the mainstream media. Our policy was formed over many years of media interaction with Creators - some personal and some observed - practically none of which was of any use for our Church, Creativity or the White Race.

https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,6495.0.html
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/white-supremacists-online-in-adelaide/2006/01/31/1138590485159.html

The media's ban on interviews with our Church Members and Supporters is the result of a knee jerk response by the media to a complaint I made to the Australian Press Council regarding an article about us in the local Murdoch press. If the Sheet Fits Wear It https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,2595.0.html And the response from the Australian Press Council https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,2595.10.html The Press Council ultimately ruled in favour of the media (had the article been written in the same fashion about Muslim, Jewish, lesbian and homosexual, indigenous or any other politically correct Australian grouping, the Press council would have without a doubt found themselves ruling against the media to the tune of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in restitution).

Reverend Cobb not being a part of our Church, has not been privy to this development. And being an Independent Creator for more than ten years now, has developed his own methods that are often opposed to those of our Church, but entirely in line with his personality. Most of what Reverend Cobb has done is harmless and immediately forgotten. Some, especially recently, has been detrimental to himself - and had we jumped in and supported Reverend Cobb to the best of our ability, it would have been detrimental to our Church as well. Or to put it another way, it was up to us to determine how far into the firing line our Church would be when the crap hits the fan. Therefore our response to Reverend Cobb's efforts in Leith, North Dakota, was to report the situation as needed with limited moral support for his goals, but without the need for public denunciation of his methods. In fact, it was the media themselves that were publicly denounced for their dirty tactics campaign against Reverend Cobb https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,7484.msg17520.html

However, had Reverend Cobb not been arrested, he would have currently been in the middle of arrangements to star in his own reality TV show, with a pilot episode possibly already in the making. The TV show itself would have entailed a camera crew following Reverend Cobb around day and night, at home and out and about for approximately two months. If Hollywood's starlets with a lifetime in the limelight cannot get through a reality TV show unscathed, what chance would Reverend Cobb have? And by extension, what chance would Creativity have? There are several options I could have taken, but all would have been aimed at either preventing the show going ahead, or minimising the negativity that would come out of such a project. Be assured that however I dealt with it, it would have been in good faith and in the understanding that although Reverend Cobb is not a Member of our Church, he is not an enemy of our Church either. We do have a right to disagreement without any need for public denunciations. He is in fact a friend to some of our Church Members and Supporters and they are in full agreement. But with Reverend Cobb's arrest bringing an end to any chance of the humiliation of a reality TV show, that is no longer a problem. So we will continue to show moral support for Reverend Cobb's intended goal, moral support for a White Brother wrongfully incarcerated by the JOG, and overall condemnation of the townsfolk of Leith and its local constabulary and the globalist media that all played a part in Reverend Cobb's downfall. As for material support, that is not our place. He already has all the material support he could ever need.

I hope that has explained our stance re Reverend Cobb and why his methods and ours differ so.

@Cailen.



EDIT: December 13, 40 AC (2013 CE)

"I am Craig Cobb, I'm an independent Creator, unaffiliated with any other Creator's Church. I am not affiliated with any of them.

I told Gerald McNeil to post the "patrol" videos. In hindsight, it was a mistake, but it was my mistake, not Gerald's."

http://whitenations.com/showthread.php?t=3429

[Rev.Cambeul]

Could someone arrange where we can make use of it (Basic lodging, food plant gardening) in exchange for the occupants taking care of the lawn and making sure his houses don't get vandalized.

The townsfolk of Leith are making arrangements to destroy Reverend Cobb's homes. From what I know, they are making arrangements with the JOG to acquire explosives so that they can blow up all thirteen homes in the typically spectacular fashion of lunatics with an ingrained hatred of themselves.

@Cailen.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

So where did you get the info that Rev Cobb would be in the Reality TV show? I could just picture it, they'd try make his crew look like "Honey Boo boo child family".

Seems Rev Cobb is his own independent Creator, however it also seems he donated a bunch of the properties to the National Socialist Movement, seems like Kynan has patches on his clothes from this group and he also sold Tom Metzger a property there for $1.

So I think it is fair to say he has affiliation with both WAR and National Socialist movement.

What bloody right does the other villagers have to destroy his property? He bought it legally. What right do they have to not sell stuff to them at their stores? Do they have a consumer affairs group in ND?
They should start their own store up and get in touch with grocery distributors to solve that issue.

What right do these villagers have to "lynch mob" him and his nationalist neighbours? They discriminate him for his beliefs and the flags he flies around the place. It is a wonder the nationalists don't go around and belt up the trouble makers who did the vandalism and killed their dog!

[Rev.Cambeul]

So where did you get the info that Rev Cobb would be in the Reality TV show? I could just picture it, they'd try make his crew look like "Honey Boo boo child family".

The info comes directly from Reverend Cobb. And yes, you know exactly what I expected from any reality TV show with a WRL at its centre.

@Cailen.