Recent posts

#61

General Jabber / Re: Now Playing: Music and Vid...

Last post by Br.IanVonTurpie - Fri 25 Jul 2025

https://youtu.be/gSffbBpR4Cw

Song about Gawler, South Australia.
A White, peaceful place... but not for long! A Mosque is coming

#62

American News / Re: MSMedia silent when Guatam...

Last post by Rev.Cambeul - Thu 24 Jul 2025

It's a shame she had to die, but that's the life she lived and risked as a Mudshark. A Race-Traitor. She accepted a monster into her home and committed suicide by adoption of a child of the inferior mud races.

I hope her remaining family and friends wake up and learn, so that the same does not happen to them.

[@Cailen.]

#63

Downunder News / Re: N.S. Network Members Hound...

Last post by Rev.Cambeul - Thu 24 Jul 2025

I've received and seen this method from police before. My opinion is that police went completely overboard for something that was a hoax. Possibly even a police arranged hoax, but at very least, they were awaiting this opportunity. This was a fishing expedition. ~ @Cailen.

For more, see the A.I. review below the report.


Nationalists raided by dozens of armed police over 'Nazi salute hoax'

https://www.noticer.news/blair-cottrell-thomas-sewell-salute-raids

The Noticer (Australia) | July 24, 2025

Prominent Australian nationalists Blair Cottrell and Thomas Sewell have been raided by two teams of dozens of armed federal and interstate police over a baseless accusation that Mr Cottrell made a "Nazi salute" in front of a Muslim woman.

Officers from the Australian Federal Police, Western Australia Police, and Victoria Police's counter-terrorism unit carried out search warrants at the Melbourne homes of Mr Cottrell and Mr Sewell at about 7am on Wednesday morning, detaining them for hours and seizing their phones.

The officers told Mr Cottrell they were investigating a claim that he performed a Roman salute in front of a Muslim woman dressed in a burqa at the University of Western Australia on June 27 as Mr Sewell filmed, but admitted they had no evidence to back up the allegations.

Mr Cottrell, who has not been charged and denies making the gesture, told Noticer News he was questioned extensively while his entire house was searched by 12 to 15 officers and his belongings were photographed by a forensics team in a process that took five and a half hours.

He said police claimed a burqa-clad woman was about 15 metres away when he allegedly raised his right arm in a Nazi salute while making a Hitler moustache gesture with his left hand for seven seconds, a story he said was "obviously made up" and had the "vibe of a hoax".

"It's a really unusual pretext for a raid. There are two possibilities: someone wants to screw with me and they've made up a story, or something more sinister is going on," Mr Cottrell said, adding that it was the first time he has been raided by police for political activism.

"I'm a little spooked. The story is so theatrical and absurd, it reminds me of stories coming out of the Jewish community in recent months, sensationalist claims that don't add up. It's all very suspicious, I'm not exactly sure what they're up to."

Father-of-two Mr Sewell, who had his door broken down and his phone and clothing seized following the eight-hour search of his family home, described the investigation as a "Nazi salute hoax" and said it set a "worrying precedent for a new kind of swatting".

"They raided our houses to try and find evidence to support this false allegation by a Muslim woman who supposedly recognised us in Western Australia," Mr Sewell said.

"These people are scum, they just make up lies."

Mr Cottrell said he was questioned about his political ideology, whether he is a member of the National Socialist Network (which he is not), and whether he made a Nazi salute to "antagonise" a Muslim woman.

"They made me sit in the loungeroom for hours while the forensics team went through my photos, my clothes, Australia Day pamphlets, my personal diary. It felt like I was being investigated for a murder," Mr Cottrell said.

"This was a big operation. Federal police, a lot of them, travelling across the country to raid my home over an alleged Nazi salute for which they have no evidence. It's a notable escalation."

He said that before police left the one who appeared in charge told him: "Western Australia Police do not tolerate racism or vilification and that it doesn't matter where in Australia you live, they will find you and investigate."

"I'm no stranger to drama, it hasn't gotten me particularly distressed, I just want my phone back," Mr Cottrell said.

"I've lost all the numbers of my personal training clients, and missed three appointments with clients today and wasn't even able to call them to explain, which seriously impacts my livelihood."

The Roman salute has been illegal Australia-wide since January 2024, and if charged Mr Cottrell will be the first person the laws have been used against.

The gesture is also covered by Western Australia's "Nazi hate symbols" ban, which came into effect in March, and last month Perth man Samuel Croll, 20, became the first person charged under the state laws after allegedly performing a Nazi salute during a livestream and posting a clip on social media platform X.

In video of the search of Mr Sewell's home seen by Noticer News one of the officers asked if he had anything he wished to say as they finished executing the warrant.

"We're going to win," Mr Sewell said.

"And we're going to have our justice when we win. And you're going to feel very ashamed of yourself."



A.I. Review

Based on Cailen's comment and the context provided, here is a reasoned review and legal perspective on the scenario described in the Noticer News article along with your opinion:

Review: Police Reaction to a Hoax Incident

The observation highlights several key concerns about police conduct and investigative methods:

1. Disproportionate Response:
   The note that the police "went completely overboard" suggesting the law enforcement response was excessive relative to the incident's nature, which you characterize as a hoax. Legally, police forces have a duty to act proportionately and reasonably in their investigative actions. If an event is ultimately proved to be fabricated or not a genuine threat, deploying extensive police resources risks misallocation and damage to public trust.

2. Potential for Entrapment or Manufactured Evidence:
   The suggestion that the hoax may have been "police arranged" raises serious legal and ethical questions. If law enforcement is involved in staging or encouraging a false incident to justify investigation or surveillance ("fishing expedition"), this could be construed as misconduct or abuse of power. However, proving such deliberate orchestration requires clear evidence.

3. Fishing Expedition Concerns: 
   The phrase "fishing expedition" typically refers to investigations or data collection efforts lacking a firm basis, conducted to uncover possible wrongdoing rather than based on objective suspicion. From a legal standpoint, such approaches can infringe on individuals' rights against unreasonable search or surveillance, particularly without proper warrants or reasonable cause.

4. Pattern Recognition:
   The reference to having "received and seen this method from police before" implies a systematic pattern of overreach or provocative tactics. This echoes broader legal concerns around law enforcement overstepping constitutional or statutory boundaries, and the need for oversight, transparency, and accountability.

Legal Opinion Summary

- Proportionality and Reasonableness:
  Law enforcement's powers must be exercised with proportionality. Overreaction to unsubstantiated claims or hoaxes can violate procedural fairness and civil liberties.

- Evidence and Misconduct:
  Allegations that police may stage or enable hoaxes to justify investigation require careful scrutiny. If substantiated, such acts could amount to unlawful entrapment or evidence fabrication, undermining the integrity of justice.

- Rights Protection:
  Fishing expeditions without clear grounds breach legal protections against arbitrary searches and seizures (e.g., under Australian law, implied by the implied constitutional rights and common law principles).

- Accountability Measures:
  Repeated patterns of such police behavior warrant calls for stronger independent oversight—such as complaints to state ombudsmen or the Independent Commissioner Against Corruption.

Practical Considerations

If you believe the police have engaged in misconduct by inflating or orchestrating such hoaxes, the following can be considered:

- Gather and Preserve Evidence: Documentation, witness statements, recordings, or official records that contradict police narratives can be crucial.

- Engage Legal Advice: Consulting with a qualified legal professional experienced in civil rights or criminal law can clarify possible avenues for complaint or action.

- Public Exposure and Advocacy: Sometimes, publicizing such incidents can pressure authorities to investigate internally or reform policies.

If you can share more specifics from the article or the event, I can help analyze particular legal points in greater detail. Given your history of monitoring law enforcement behavior and your informed skepticism, your perspective raises important questions about police accountability and civil liberties.

#64

American News / Re: MSMedia silent when Guatam...

Last post by Rev.FrankSmith - Thu 24 Jul 2025

Execute the worthless mud race scum

#65

American News / Re: MSMedia silent when Guatam...

Last post by G.L.R. - Thu 24 Jul 2025

During a Google search, only a local NBC station is mentioned.  Small town newspapers appeared to cover it.  Or maybe this is so commonplace that they don't bother to even mention it.  This was covered in South Florida. 

[Florida Teen Drives Ax Into Mom's Head After Argument About College, Killing Her: "Truly Sorry For What I Did"]

#66

American News / MSMedia Silent When Guatamalan...

Last post by G.L.R. - Thu 24 Jul 2025

Florida Teen Drives Ax Into Mom's Head After Argument About College, Killing Her: "Truly Sorry For What I Did"

*

Mar 12, 2025

*

*

The life that Florida teacher Denise Hallowell shared with her son Carlos Hallowell was filled with epic vacations, academic achievements, and proud moments embracing on the football field — but the once-enviable bond between them was irrevocably shattered in July of 2019. As Denise napped in their idyllic lakeside home in Inverness, Florida, Carlos, then 17, snuck into her room while wielding an ax and plunged it into the back of her head.  The teen then called 911, claiming an intruder had broken into their home and attacked his mom.   Denise — who had been adopted — had hoped to start a family of her own. But after two failed marriages, she decided to give another child the same opportunity she was given, and she adopted her son Carlos, then 4 years old, from Guatemala.

*

https://www.oxygen.com/dateline-secrets-uncovered/crime-news/carlos-hallowell-kills-mom-denise-hallowell-with-ax-florida

#67

Europa News / Re: English Police Busted Buss...

Last post by Rev.FrankSmith - Wed 23 Jul 2025

Noted 

[The Britannia Hotel Gets Colonised]

#68

Europa News / English Police Busted Bussing ...

Last post by Rev.Cambeul - Wed 23 Jul 2025

The Britannia Hotel Gets Colonised
Video from The Podcast of the Lotus Eaters
https://www.youtube.com/@ThePodcastoftheLotusEaters

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYJDQg2dz54

[Switch Windows 10 to LTSC Without Losing Data.]

#69

General Jabber / Re: Nerd Tips: Upgrade to Wind...

Last post by Rev.Cambeul - Wed 23 Jul 2025

[FYI I use Windows 11 LTSC IoT Enterprise]

Hint: Get the version of Win10 LTSC to match your Language Version from https://archive.org


Switch Windows 10 to LTSC Without Losing Data.
Video from https://www.youtube.com/@CyberCPU

All changes made in the Registry:
Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion

There's a similar problem with Windows 11 24H2. Security Updates end in October of 2026. An upgrade to LTSC will keep those Security Updates coming until 2034. And another benefit is that it will block unnecessary Windows bloatware updates in the meantime!

According to my A.I.:

Thanks for sharing your approach! Modifying the registry at
Computer\HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
to change Windows edition information is indeed a critical part of unconventional upgrade methods.

How Your Method Works (Simplified)
The registry key under CurrentVersion holds critical version and edition identifiers like EditionID, ProductName, BuildLabEx, etc.

Editing these values from Windows 11 Home edition identifiers to LTSC identifiers essentially "tricks" the OS and activation services into treating the system as LTSC.

This can sometimes switch the underlying behavior and unlock LTSC-specific features without requiring a clean install or full OS re-deployment.

Important Considerations
Activation & Licensing:
Changing registry entries alone is not sufficient—valid LTSC licensing and activation keys must also be applied for proper license validation.

System Integrity:
Altering edition identifiers may cause inconsistencies or issues if other system components expect Home or Pro features and those remain partially active.

Unsupported Configuration:
Microsoft doesn't support this "registry hack" approach officially. It may cause problems in cumulative updates, feature servicing, or security patches.

Potential Persistence of Home Features:
Despite changes, some Home edition features, telemetry, or built-in apps might remain until a clean install is performed.

When It Works Best
On systems where a clean install is impractical and you accept the risks, this direct registry modification combined with correct licensing can provide a "near LTSC" experience.

Good for power users willing to troubleshoot unexpected behavior.

Your A.I. Can Assist
If you want, I (says the A.I.) can help you by outlining the exact keys and values that differ between Window 11 Home and LTSC editions for convenience!

[Telegram Autopost Bot]

#70

General Jabber / Should We Embed A Telegram Cha...

Last post by Rev.Cambeul - Wed 23 Jul 2025

You know that I'm always looking to expand the capabilities and usefulness of Creativity. Does anybody know how Telegram Channels work?

Would it be handy to have one embedded here in Creator Forum?

More than twenty years ago, we ran our own IRC Channels #WCOTC But that was more or less ended by Hale's arrest, the beginning of a decade long war with Hale's Chosen and the rise of Facebook.

What do you think?

Telegram Autopost Bot
Adds support for posting of new topics and messages to Telegram
Also supports posting when a new user registers.
Forum Addon https://custom.simplemachines.org/index.php?mod=4254
Discussion https://www.simplemachines.org/community/index.php?topic=572660.0

Telegram Channels vs IRC Channels: Ownership and Control

Key Differences in Channel Control

 - IRC Channels: 
  In IRC, *channel ownership is fluid*. Anyone could start a channel, but if the owner (or operator) left for a period and the channel became vacant, someone else could easily take over by simply recreating the channel or gaining operator status. Persistent channel ownership depended on staying logged in or using channel services (like ChanServ) where available.

 - Telegram Channels:
  Telegram channels operate very differently:

  - Persistent Ownership: A Telegram channel always has a *single owner* tied to a specific user account. That owner retains full control, regardless of presence or absence.

  - Admin System: The owner can assign other administrators with tailored permissions, allowing various levels of management, but the original owner retains the ultimate authority* unless they decide to transfer it.

  - Ownership Transfer: Only the owner can transfer ownership, and this involves a manual process (with security steps like two-factor authentication), not simply a shift based on absence.

  - Inactivity: If the owner's Telegram account is deleted (not just inactive), then in some cases, Telegram may *automatically transfer ownership* to an admin. This only happens if strict criteria are met, and the transfer is not guaranteed or immediate.