Speech Limitation: No Targeting "Individuals"

[Grimm]

You folks know I want you all to be safe. Why are whites considered the most dangerous terrorist group in the USA?  Because we don't break the law.. we find legal ways of getting results.  This article shows where a free speech line crossing is..  Calling on people to target 1 individual for harassment.

With a few carefully chosen words. this could have been avoided..  Saying "I think we should troll people like this!" instead of giving a direct name would have probably been safer.

I've said this before but we would really benefit from legally knowledgeable people who we could play the "what if.." game to KNOW FOR SURE we are in the right and to KNOW FOR SURE were the absolute limit is. 

Possibly the service known as "legal shield" would help...

additionally.. large lists of questions can be submitted to for hire legal people on fiverr..


We could also hire some legal people as "employees" and sell their services on fiverr to generate income for them..  allowing us to have them at our curious whims for pretty much free.


Find out how much one would cost a month


Source:
https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/neo-nazi-harassment-is-not-free-speech-judge-rules-1.6660136


Piece of article:

Ruling says the First Amendment does not shield Daily Stormer publisher Andrew Anglin from being sued for his followers' anti-Semitic harassment of a Jewish woman and her family in Montana

A federal judge's decision to allow a lawsuit to proceed against the publisher of a neo-Nazi website is "dangerous for free speech," the publisher's attorney said Thursday.

Attorney Marc Randazza said he believes U.S. District Judge Dana Christensen made a legally flawed decision Wednesday in ruling the First Amendment does not shield Daily Stormer publisher Andrew Anglin from being sued for his followers' anti-Semitic harassment of a Jewish woman and her family in Montana.

Randazza said he can "see the allure of not wanting to rule in favor of the Nazi," but expressed concern that the decision could be used to curtail free speech in many other forums.