WHITE PEOPLE TOO OFTEN CHOOSE DOGS OVER CHILDREN

[Miss.Jane]

 In the UK there are over 8 million pet dogs and barely that number of children aged 10 or under.
In the UK the Islamic newcomers shun dog ownership, as do non-White immigrants generally, and so are responsible for a drop in per capita dog ownership but increase in numbers of children.
When you know nothing more about a person than that they are a White European aged 25 you can take a bet they more likely have dogs than children.
Dogs are expensive, cramp your lifestyle and so on in the ways that typically the "child free" race traitor women – who will also often own cats and treat them as their babies – tell you makes them avoid childbearing.
The toxocara worms from dogs and cats cause human birth defects and blindness in children.  Dogs are often a danger to children and parents who take their children out for a walk inevitably have daily encounters with dog defecation and dogs bounding up barking or putting their mouths and paws on the children.
A man or a woman with a dog severely reduces their chances of meeting up with a potential mate who wants to start a family OF HUMANS.  But I think my Chinese flat-mate was onto something when she said she thinks women "sleep with" their dogs in more ways than one in a lot of cases. Of course her people would rather put them into their meals.
Some will object, saying that many families include a dog.  True but that does not negate my points. They have on average fewer children and set those kids up to repeat the degenerate pattern of behaviour.  It is a good indicator that the family is dysfunctional in some way and the mentality that an alien species is one of your family is an attitude that carries on into lack of racial awareness.
It is truly sick when pets are regarded as baby substitutes.  Often they are included as if they were people on greetings cards for example or they actually sleep in the same bed as the owner.
http://creativityreligionresourcecentre.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/confused.jpg

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

The thing is having a child now is a large responsibility , You are looking at $100K AUD to raise a kid to 18, to feed, educate it and give it clothing, meals etc. Then there is prospect of the kid growing up and looking for work, it is all outsourced internally or externally. Can you get the property to accommodate the children?
Sadly like 60% of the kid's parents who are 6years old in school now have divorced, you are up for a custody dispute that could be costly. Who is going to look after the kid when both members of the household are working to compete with Sub-continentals and Asians who are snapping up OUR property. This isn't easy. The life span of a large dog is like 12 years, a smaller one will go longer.
We don't live in old days where kids just come when they come, if you are in trouble you can make that go away if you want.
If all the smart white women are career women, this means the race will degenerate as all the dumb ones will breed.

[Rev.Cambeul]

When I was a kid in the 70's, all families had pets. The children grew up filthy dirty and black by the end of each day rolling around in the yard with their dogs and cats and other kids, and pristine white and smelling of perfumed soap by the same evening. Allergies, asthma and obesity were oddities for children, and although allergies and asthma were rare in adults, adult obesity was more often than not a result of natural body development as one ages, rather than eating junk food. So what happened? By the 80's the average household was severely downsized leaving room for a child or a pet - but not both. The "Get out and play in the dirt" parenting of the pre-80's was replaced with modern antiseptic parenting and children treated as if they were an investment were wrapped in cotton wool. The number of children a woman would give birth to became a choice, rather than a natural part of the life cycle. And as the economy changed and more women entered the workforce, more women chose to put off childbirth until later in life, thereby limiting yet again the numbers of children born into the world, and increasing the prevalence of the cotton wool kids.

When kids and dogs were raised together, city children learned about the marvels and heartbreak of nature in much the same as children on farms once did (and still do, but to a lesser degree every day). And that filth and dirt I spoke of meant an increased natural resistance to allergies and diseases leading to an all-round healthier population. Nowadays with the cultural option being antiseptic children or dirty dogs - not both - the dirtiest thing a child comes into contact with in the antiseptic household is the joystick of a video game. The kids have unnatural allergies to all sorts of foods, grow up without any idea of life and death, no understanding of natural bodily functions and procreation beyond the highly sexualised imagery of popular media. Gone are the days of happy kid dressed in hand-me-down rags with the snotty nose, black face and dirt in the hair rolling around in the back yard with the family dog. Instead we have sexually precocious, sickly and socially retarded Britney Spears and Justin Timberlake clones looking forward to their first hit of meth while dancing to tracks from Guitar Hero on their TV, and absolutely no consideration for others.

This is not nature! This is a parody of life that should never have come to pass. The separation of children and pets is a major part of the culture change that has divorced an entire generation from nature and led to the horror that is the allergy ridden, drug addled "ME FIRST!" generation. Which leads back to the original topic again: a lot of people are disgusted by what they see in the world, and find dogs a whole lot rewarding than the threat of an an attention deficit seeking hyperactivity disorderly drugged up brat armed holding a kitchen knife to your throat, that you cannot even chastise without risk of imprisonment. And who in their right mind wants that? After all, that is exactly what the media and government today promote as the risk of having children ... and the media and government surely wouldn't lie to us, would they? So the people with the most to lose, good home, good job, ... good life, unnaturally avoid having children and adopt a dog instead; while those with nothing to lose see having kids solely as a way of making money as if children are a type of long term investment to raise quickly and quietly in a sterile environment, babysat by the TV and turned out on the unsuspecting populace when the money ceases to come in, which is why it's the dummies of society that are growing in number, while the average, intelligent White man and woman are more frequently the last of their line.

If all the smart white women are career women, this means the race will degenerate as all the dumb ones will breed.

Idiocracy

Pay to Watch:

Idiocracy

Idiocracy is a comedy film by Mike Judge. Watch it, enjoy it, and reflect on the warnings portrayed in this humorous devolution of man.

@Cailen.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Look at the play grounds we had in the 70's and 80's  compared to the poxy "cotton wool kids" primary coloured , "namby pamby" crap kids get now! Sad sign of the times! You take the fun out of a kid's life and pretty soon you'll find them jumping down steps, or sliding hand rails on their skateboards and BMX bikes to make their own fun.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Monash Playground, South Australia, 1980s

Now! that's a playground! And that's what kids are supposed to do growing up!