Should Creativity Approve of Polygamy ?

[Rev.Cambeul]

To worry about which White person is allowed to procreate at this stage would be a quicker death for the White race. Leave that kind of thinking out for at least the next hundred years.

@Cailen.

[Sinn]

In Australia, our government pays mothers $4,000 for each child they have. Instead of promoting higher birth rates amongst the best of our race, we see the laziest and most drug addicted producing children solely for the easy money. A high birth rate may allow us to keep up with the birth rates of muds but is it worth it if the White families breeding are most commonly drug addicted and criminal?

A large family should be encouraged amongst Whites if they can afford to offer their children a suitable standard of living. A lot of people choose to have two or fewer kids because it's too expensive to have anymore but spend excessive amounts of money on crap that could go towards raising another two children quite comfortably. There is no point breeding beyond our means. Having more than one wife also adds to the emotional and financial stress in a household, until we can comfortably support nuclear families, I'd say save the polygamy for later.

Other than that, I see nothing morally wrong with polygamy.

[Sturmkrieger]

I would have to say no to polygamy. It's opposed to the family unit, which is detrimental to the White Race's survival. I feel it makes family impersonal and brings it down. Sure, you can have more White babies, but what's the point if they are not going to have a sound upbringing? As Founder Klassen stated multiple times, you destroy the family, you destroy the race. I also believe Klassen stated he disproved of polygamy in his review of Mormonism in "A Revolution of Values Through Religion." But then again, I can see the pros, especially in producing more White children. It's definitely something that needs to be discussed more.

[Rebel]

 Creativity are not against it because there is not book where stay which kind of family we must have and if od something not prohibited it is allow,it os I think basic of court with Roman hertiage. Our religion think that rich whites must have more children than poor whites. Creativity is religion of the eternal laws od nature. I read one child scientic book with short explanation of one kind of animal. Animal fight with animal and then all womans goes with the winner who reproduces his genes through all womans who have children with him. It is hard to expect that will rich white woman have for example 20 kids so I think that is polygamy not against our religion,on the cons of it is in harmony with nature but it is not for working class.

Rich whites work a lot so they have money for their children but do not have time for spend much time with them so their children still have better life than working class children with mother. Rich children have team who take care for them. I think that we van not implement eugenic without polygamy. If I have a lot of money,I would as rich Creator definitely live in polygamy but not as working class,as middle class maybe iz is question for discussion. The problem is in white society where whites who do not live in polygamy have more children than richer whites whose womans do not want to have more kids but I do not expect by them because rich more advance and then se have bolshevism.

Read WMB article Civilization without racial religion- just destructive process foto the White race for understanding my post. I think that would rich whites accept polygamy if they become Creators because they are living life as I said but their profit do not go for their children than  for degeneration of themselves through drugs,orgy etc. instead of reproduction. Mans think under logic and womans under hearts,love pass but our children grow and 14 words are still alive. Read also chapter Love,womans and war by Might os right for understanding that.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Now that I've been divorced eighteen years

In a few months I'll have been divorced for twenty-eight years, and my views haven't changed from ten years ago.