Debate: Evolution vs Creationism

[Sinn]

An interesting article I found on another forum about The Debate:

http://www.articlesafari.com/2010/09/whites-asians-did-not-come-from-africa/

Geographer claims the races evolved from different ancestors.

A public claim by a fellow of the prestigious Royal Geographic Society that humans did not all come from Africa — and that blacks, whites and Asians have different ancestors — has been dismissed by world experts as "dangerous", "wrong" and "racist".



In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India's prime minister, claims that "Negroid", "Caucasian" and "Mongoloid" peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa.

The prevalent scientific theory of modern humans — the "Out of Africa" model — is that they left Africa just 55000 years ago and replaced the last remnants of other ancient hominids living in Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

The old biological racial distinctions of "Caucasian", "Negroid" and "Mongoloid" have recently been abandoned by mainstream scientists — removed, for instance, from the US National Library of Medicine in 2003.

Bakshi has become a self-declared champion of a minority scientific view called "multiregionalism", which claims that modern humans evolved from separate hominid populations. Hominids encompass all humans and the ancient family of human-like ancestors, including large-brained ancient ancestors and unsuccessful species such as Neanderthals.
However, Bakshi — who has no training as an anthropologist — has linked to this model a theory that these populations evolved according to the genetic material left behind when the prehistoric supercontinents, the northern Laurasia and the southern Gondwanaland, broke up. An influential figure in India, Bakshi is also a filmmaker and author who has led four major scientific expeditions since 1994. Bakshi admitted to the Sunday Times that "some of my points may prove to be wrong, and may be seen as politically incorrect.

He claims indigenous "Negroid" populations occur in places like Australia, India, Sri Lanka, the Philippines and the Andaman Islands not because they moved there from Africa, but because all these land masses were once part of Gondwanaland — and that all evolved separately. Whites, according to Bakshi, are from Laurasia and blacks are from Gondwanaland. He argues that, 60000 years ago, humans could not have crossed vast oceans and deserts to reach remote places like Australia and North America, and they must therefore have evolved there.

"His is a highly confused argument which jumps enormous levels, which are quite impossible to link," Tobias said.
However, he added that the true picture of modern humanity's precise departure from Africa was far from clear-cut.

[Jimbo]

In a paper widely trumpeted and due for release in book form, Akhil Bakshi, the leader of a recent major scientific expedition supported by India's prime minister, claims that "Negroid", "Caucasian" and "Mongoloid" peoples are not only separate races but separate species, having evolved on different continents. Responding to the claims — developed while Bakshi led the Gondwanaland expedition from India to South Africa — Professor Lee Berger, a leading palaeoanthropologist at the University of the Witwatersrand, immediately insisted that, there were no fundamental differences between the races and that all humans had the same genetic and physical roots in Africa

a bit more acceptable than "the-out-of-Afreaka" hypothesis which has Aryans being "related" to mud buggers and grub-flippers!

i categorically refuse to accept that i'm "related" to effin' niggers or kikez....how-ever effin' "distant"!

"Professor Lee Berger"......i'm "plonking" for a kike....there-fore....any-fucking-thing he sez can, quite safely, be ignored!

is it a jew?

then: it's an effin' LIE!

"Bakshi" is, also, doubtless going on the irrefutable genetic evidence which has massive canyons of "haplotypic" difference between whites and non-whites.....especially between Caucasians and niggers and gooks!

(jews are a bit more "problematic" because a goodly % have STOLEN white DNA in their filthy effin' carcasses!..... ......generally, though, they're some-where between a "chigger" and a nigger/gook!....and quite a significant incremental difference exists between them and Aryans on the haplotype genome map!)

"His is a highly confused argument which jumps enormous levels, which are quite impossible to link," Tobias said

uhh.....yeh!!.....he would say that, wouldn't he?....more than his career or, indeed, his life would be worth to say OTW!

However, he added that the true picture of modern humanity's precise departure from Africa was far from clear-cut

do tell!

a faint glimmer of "honesty" from Prfssr Phillip V Tobias!


cheers!


(Jimbo)

[SethCochran]

i categorically refuse to accept that i'm "related" to effin' niggers or kikez....how-ever effin' "distant"!

Jimbo,

You're fooling yourself.

We Creators believe reality is a million times more meaningful than fantasy.

Did you know that you are related to everything that has DNA?  Yep, everything from me to a gnat.  How closely you are related depends on your last common ancestor.

Two siblings are most closely related because their last common ancestor was one generation previous.  Cousins are less related than brothers because their last common ancestor was two generations ago, and so on.  So you are related to the jews, very distantly.  It's important we establish that.  If not we could end up with theories that say White people are the descendants of aliens that visited the Sumerians, and other such nonsense.

Stick to the truth Jimbo.

[SethCochran]

Jimbo,

In your search for the truth, remember:

What is good for the White Race is the highest virtue, and what is bad for the White Race is the ultimate sin.

A Creator is not gullible, and does not easily accept any statement, belief, assertation or assumption that to him is lacking in proof and/or is unreasonable in the light of his own experiences.

A Creator is not superstitious and disdains belief in the supernatural. He will waste no time giving credence to, or playing silly games with imaginary spooks, spirits, gods and demons.

A Creator does not whine, complain or indulge in self-pity, but instead faces problems realistically, gets to the root of problems, and determines to solve them.

I would rather see you struggle with this issue for the rest of your life than to fall into the trap of irrationality and unrealistic belief.

[RaspStarb]

Whites are not related to niggers or chinks in any way.  The old saw of how human DNA and chimpanzee DNA are 98% identical is a misrepresentation of the fact that the genes we have in common are the so-called "junk DNA" which all living things have in common.  When a White woman gives birth, the baby is White, when a nigger sow sh*ts out a niglet, it will always be black.  That is Nature's way and has been for millions of years.  It's the same with an apple tree, the seed will always produce more apples--not cucumbers or poppies.

The White Race developed independent from muds, IN EUROPE, at least 1.8 million years ago!

A skull that rewrites the history of man

"The Dmanisi hominins are the earliest representatives of our own genus – Homo – outside Africa, and they represent the most primitive population of the species Homo erectus to date. They might be ancestral to all later Homo erectus populations, which would suggest a Eurasian origin of Homo erectus."