The Invasion Is Off - NATO Expansionism Has Suffered A Major Setback

[G.L.R.]

NATO expansionism has suffered a major setback

16 Feb, 2022



Russian troops are pulling back from the border in the knowledge they've achieved their objectives

NATO's policy of expansionism at the expense of Russia's security concerns has suffered a major setback. The bloc's members never intended to push Ukraine to abide by its commitments to the Minsk agreements, designed to put an end to fighting... Instead, NATO countries aimed to undermine the Minsk agreement by changing the reality on the ground: Russia was intended to be weakened by sanctions and Ukraine was to be strengthened by supplying weapons. ... NATO responded by pledging their support to the authorities in Kiev and threatened Moscow with devastating sanctions if it would come to the defence of the breakaway regions. 

What it all means is that the Jew globalists, who have taken over the US and Britain are trying to start a war with 'rogue Russia'

Russia mobilised its troops in response, established clear red lines that would trigger an intervention, and made it clear that further Western sanctions would merely intensify Russia's economic decoupling from Europe... The French president even suggested that we need a new approach to pan-European security and observed what should have been obvious: Europe cannot have security if Russia is denied security.

*

Washington's much advertised "invasion day" reveals the absurd narrative that Russia is pursuing territorial conquest or attempting to restore the Soviet Union. Even the Europeans appear to be exhausted by Washington's confrontational approach and war hysteria. It is common to contrast diplomacy with military force. In reality, diplomacy must often be supported by power. The Cold War ended in 1989 through negotiation and compromise between two equals... There was also no more need for NATO to abide by existing agreements or international law, and all promises of not expanding NATO one inch to the east were dishonestly dismissed as a Russian "myth."For 30 years, Russian efforts to negotiate a role for itself in pan-European security were ignored...

The invasion is off, but the crisis isn't over. And the globalist Jews are using NATO as they do the US, the EU and the UN to create their One World Order.

Russia was meant to have invaded Ukraine on Tuesday. Or was it Wednesday? The media couldn't quite make up its mind, with some outlets predicting one and others the other, all based on tip-offs from anonymous American, and occasionally British, officials. The White House refused to name a specific date, limiting itself to a prediction that the invasion could happen at almost any time, while the British government said Russian bombs could start falling "within minutes" of the order being given. Parallels with claims some 20 years ago that Iraqi chemical weapons were at 45-minutes readiness... Embarrassingly for all involved, not only has the promised invasion failed to appear...

It would appear that the invasion is off. Russian President Vladimir Putin appeared to reject a plea by the lower house of the Russian parliament, the State Duma, to recognize the independence of the rebel Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics in Donbass in eastern Ukraine. While he denounced what was happening in Donbass as "genocide," he also said that everything should be done to end the war there by fulfilling the terms of the 2015 Minsk 2 agreement, which would see Donbass reintegrated within Ukraine with significant autonomy. Putin continues to look for a diplomatic solution.

The invasion is off, but the crisis isn't over — RT Russia & Former Soviet Union
https://www.rt.com/russia/549600-invasion-off-crisis-continue

NATO expansionism has suffered a major setback — RT Russia & Former Soviet Union
https://www.rt.com/russia/549608-moscow-forceful-diplomacy-nato

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

From Australia first newsletter

The Campaign For Armed Neutrality *
Dr. Jim Saleam

As I wrote in our last bulletin, Armed Neutrality for Australia is not just the right policy for our country, it is a viable policy around which the nationalist party can be built.

The last ten days have shook the world. Globalism and its institutions have been challenged by the unfortunate war between Russia and Ukraine.

Yet, if we are to believe our overseas-loyal politicians, the good guys have united around NATO and the EEC and the USA to oppose 'tyranny' and 'aggression' and in favour of our 'rules-based international order'. Of course, these 'rules' have involved unilaterally attacking other countries (like Iraq in 2003) and covertly supporting ISIS against the secular Syrian government in 2011 ff.

The media is not telling us that many countries are either neutral in this war or support Russia (in the latter case, whether they vote with it in the United Nations, or stand with it in other ways).

The pro Russian ones are: North Korea, Syria, Iran, Burma, Belarus, Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. We would expect most of that.

However, it is the sheer weight of the neutral ones that is staggering: India, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Mexico, Brazil, Indonesia, Malaysia, China, Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Armenia, Laos, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Bolivia, El Salvador, the Central Asian republics that were formerly parts of the Soviet Union and a host of African countries.

These alignments may also serve to delineate 'sides' if matters were to further deteriorate. This is not a scenario to the advantage of the true Australia.

The biggest blow to the politicians here was the seeming defection of India from the so-called 'Quad' (a friendly arrangement of the USA, Japan, Australia and India) to police the Indian Ocean and share intelligence. Our politicians thought it would balance China in South Asia. India's neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine war is obviously in pursuit of its own interests and shows sharp calculation. Indeed, a week is a long time in politics!

And then, there are the disruptions of trade, investment, financial power and so on. It may be that the Russian Federation will suffer from 'sanctions', but it is equally true that the globalist economic system has experienced a severe shock.

Further, we may speak of other instability. Consider Hungary. This state voted against Russia in the United Nations. But it also has grievances against Ukraine and lucrative trade in Russia, to the point where its world-renowned Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, has broken ranks with 'the West' over some matters. See the link below, and note the point where 'the West' may encourage some political parties to move against him:

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/4/ukraine-war-orban-struggling-maintain-putin-balancing-act

Would 'the West' interfere in Australia if we broke ranks? That's a thought! However at the moment, our running dog political leaders would scarce consider it.

Indeed, Australian Nationalists can note the slavish way that our government has insinuated its way into the Russia-Ukraine conflict, offering weapons and other help to the latter. It has gone well beyond diplomacy. There have been dark suggestions that should the shooting war end in Russia's favour, Australia may join in promoting some sort of insurgency – which would make us a target for retaliation.

Ordinary people are struggling to understand. It must be our role as nationalists  to get the picture first that we may lead! We link here to an item which discusses the Russian logic about Ukraine. The item isn't friendly to them, but it shows a lot of the strategic geopolitical assessments that underlie it. Russian logic makes many mistakes, particularly in its failure to appreciate Ukrainian identity. At the same time, we may perceive their fears about Western interference in Ukraine over the last thirty years.

https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/438567/mod_resource/content/2/Aleksandr_Dugins_Neo-Eurasianism_and_the.pdf

Australians always have a sincere regard for any country enduring the hardship of war.  But Australians have no interest in confronting Russia either. Of course, no Australian would want Russia to occupy Ukraine permanently. Yet, it is matter beyond our power and fraught with problems, particularly when 'we' team up with allies with other agendas. And make no mistake, this 'West' does have other agendas. We might even suspect the agenda is to challenge Russia and the leadership of Putin to the last drop of blood of the last Ukrainian.

As ever, we are nationalists. Our patriotic mission is to secure a political system that secures Australia's identity, independence and freedom. Our vision is of a country is friendly to all who would trade with us and deal with us fairly, but our destiny cannot be fulfilled in confrontations not in our interest. That was the sad path of the twentieth century. The advocacy of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine war is just a part of our stand for Armed Neutrality for Australia. Australia must rearm, systematically and extensively and have no alliance or confrontation with the three superpowers – USA, China, Russia. We must plan to defend ourselves alone