#SSM Same Sex Marriage - VOTE NO - New Hate-Crime Laws

[Rev.Cambeul]

The Vote is Over.

The vote for decency and the future of White Children - the NO VOTE - has lost by 12%.

The results of 12.7 million votes were announced in Australia on Wednesday morning.

Yes responses, 7,817,247 ... 61.6 per cent of clear responses were Yes.

No responses, 4,873,987 ... 38.4 per cent of clear responses were No.

36,686 responses were unclear representing 0.2 per cent of total responses.

Source: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/relationships/marriage/samesex-marriage-survey-why-thousands-of-votes-were-deemed-invalid/news-story/6459dc09f72545daa718dcbfe693a043

However, the battle continues.

Politicians are now debating how extensive the new Hate-Crime Laws are going to be.

* Can a priest refuse to marry fags or dykes?

* Can a marriage celebrant refuse to marry fags or dykes?

* Can a baker refuse to bake a wedding cake specifically designed for fags or dykes?

* Can incorporated groups or clubs refuse the membership of fags and dykes?

* Can religious organisations - whether state acknowledged Christian or unacknowledged Creator - reject fags and dykes?

* And, have I broken the new Hate-Crime laws by dispensing with the term "Same Sex Marriage/Couple" in favour of the plain old "fags and dykes?"

Let me give you some insight about that last one:

Yesterday, I received a phone call from an Australian Creator that had been approached by a rather senior representative of the State Police - I'll withhold which state. The Brother had printed his own protest flyer re fag marriage, and stuck it on the window of his car. The brass-tacked copper proceeded to question our Brother with an end-goal of Hate-Crime charges. Basically, the questions took the following format:

* Who created the flyer?

* Who put the flyer on the car?

* What does the flyer represent?

* What is the purpose of the flyer?

The key questions here are: Who placed the flyer on the car and, What is the purpose of the flyer? If the Brother was to answer with something like, "It's to annoy the fags. I hate those degenerate bastards." He would probably be held in prison, refused bail, arrested under the state's and possibly Federal Hate-Crime charges.

Fortunately for the Brother, he was able to genuinely say that he merely placed the flyer on his car as a protest against Same Sex Marriage. The difference with the second statement is that it was one of legitimate concern during a national debate, while the former reveals intent that has been deemed a criminal act under Hate-Crime legislation.

Under Australian Federal and the various State Hate-Crime Laws, "Good Intentions" is the legal decider as to whether or not you are charged and/or convicted with a Hate-Crime.

However, despite the Brother's clear good intentions to make a valid and reasonable public statement at a time of national debate, the Brother was ordered to either remove his flyer, or be arrested under a range of numerous other laws unrelated to the context of the flyer itself, such as Disorderly Conduct and Incitement to Violence.

Given the option, the Brother had no choice other than to remove his flyer. And the brass-tacked pig waddled off back to its sty of an office, to wallow and await the next opportunity for quick advancement to the heights of the State Political Police.

It should go without saying that our Brother was shocked when he realised how close he'd come to being arrested for Hate-Crimes just for a simple flyer. And even worse, how close he'd come to being responsible for elevating that brass-tacked porker of an overblown constable from complete obscurity to international fame as the pig that found the golden truffle. However, the fact remains that our Brother was not aware of how his local (both Federal and State) Hate-Crime laws work, just as I'm sure many of you reading this remain unsure of how your own Hate-Crime Laws work.

My Advice Is:

* Learn and understand your local Hate-Crime Laws.

* When questioned by the political police, speak only of your good intentions to participate in the debate (whatever that debate may be). Even so, keep it to a short, pre-prepared statement.

* Beyond that remember The Five Words: "I have nothing to say."

Cailen.

[Rev.Cambeul]

EXIT HOMOPHOBIA, ENTER HETEROPHOBIA: "SODOM" VOTERS PROVE DEMOCRACY IS EVIL

Scrawled in pink chalk on a Sydney pathway in the wake of today's vote on the Sodom Law were two words, "Love Wins."

United Nationalists Australia | 15 November 2011

https://unitednationalistsaustralia.wordpress.com/2017/11/15/exit-homophobia-enter-heterophobia-sodom-voters-prove-democracy-is-evil

Former Australian Parliamentarian & head of the Liberal Party, Alexander Downer.
Source: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au
Moments when Australian politicians were just awkward

"Love Wins." This is a propagandistic slogan if ever there was one. We should know since we've come up with enough of our own.

Once you've understood the slogan's referential function, deduced its expressive function, surmised its conative function, fathomed its phatic function and flipped by its contextual function you'll realise what the slogan would properly mean separated from the sentimentality of its addresser is that "institutionalized love wins". Once you've dealt with that dialectic you should be free enough from the propaganda to deduce that this has nothing to do with 'love'.

Love doesn't require the formal acknowledgement of an institution to prosper and in fact, it is more likely to stifle and suppress that love.

Moreover, you must grapple with the logic of tearing down the pillars of an institution to institutionalise that which the former pillars existed to ensure did not endanger the institution that was in place to safeguard against what the new institution formally validates. Meaning, there was, beyond what the Cultural Marxists who voted Yes perceive, more to the institution of marriage than "love". Indeed, it was a social contract beyond enshrining the rights of deviant minorities into law.

But before we use the word deviant we must now readdress the contextual relevance of that word since deviancy can only really be determined by the majority of society and policed by its agents of social control, such as the media, lawmakers, academics, politicians, Waleed Aly and so forth.

Even here we have a problem since the degenerate homos who have won this "right" to smash apart a sacred pact between a man and a woman are not of themselves in the majority but the reverse. It is their agents who are in the majority.

For that matter, the vote only passed by a rabbit's dick of 7% with some Labor electorates like 'Calwell' in Victoria, named after our Nationalist Aussie hero Arthur Calwell, doing us proud by voting No. Now it is down to the traitor political class to pass this bull* law and applaud themselves for having totally *ed everything that this country once stood for. It is now in the hands of the banks, corporations, and the hedonistic consumers who keep their share portfolios fattening with profit. This same-sex marriage vote was, after all, pushed heavily by media and the corporations.

Anyway, having digressed for a moment, we have ascertained that the majority has granted the minority an unequal representation among the majority. If we tie that back to what social science once understood about deviancy we now have anyone from the former institution who is strident enough to hold firm to their beliefs cast on the outside of what society now upholds to be 'normal'. The respectable is now the outsider and the deviant is the pillar of this brave new society.

Since we're talking about institutions, it seems fair to acknowledge that garbage from the baby boomer generation who trampled this filth into our lives — who inculcated these Cultural Marxist codes into the heads of our youth via the institutions they took over — were the ones who loathed the very concept of the institution of marriage. Their lot burned their bras and jockstraps and went in for "free love" and threw things at Servicemen returning from the horrors of America's doomed war in Vietnam.

SJW two'fer deal...
They may adopt a White male baby and kill it.

Yet, here are the fruits of their decades of campaigning — they have killed the social and religious premise of marriage. They have redefined it and in doing so have set in motion an entire wheel of social changes that will exclude, criminalise, and disadvantage all of those whose ideological and religious convictions now place them as an "other".

The despised "cisgender" White male; the devout Christian; the fervent social conservative are all now outside of that societal approval and therefore beyond the gates of the institution which ironically once upon a time they were the most ardent advocates for.

Any parent who doesn't wish their child to be taught the finer points of buggery by a genderless freak reared in the social laboratory of modern society will be demonised, ostracised, and — if they aren't just patronisingly dismissed as absurdly quaint — used as an example of that which is abhorrent to this newfangled society based on repudiated gender and opposition to the fundamentals of nature. Any Christian who refuses to accommodate a reception or conduct a marriage between freakish gender-confused parties will be sued, vilified, hounded, doxed, and probably beaten up by roaming squadrons of Nazi Dykes, Faggots, and Transgender Chemical commandos.

It will be ironic to see how they must now shuffle their hierarchy of victimhood to accommodate the obvious dissension of devout Moslems, which are still currently a protected species in the Social Justice Warrior red book.

Now they need another cause; now they've run out of steam there is another minority group whose interests must usurp that of the majority until there is nothing left but until the day invading armies of Chinese soldiers paint the walls with their soft, squishy, *ed-up, chemically-altered brains.

Yes, folks, we are on the road to being a PC Police State, just like England.

EDIT: After we went to press with this item out came the images from the unscheduled orgy at Hyde Park where fairies, fags, dykes, princesses, lady boys, he-girls and every kind of pervert combo imagined in this age of decadence, got straight down to exposing themselves and cavorting in a manner that would, in saner countries, have them all shot.

Dyking it up in Sydney for all the world to see - whether they like it or not.
Or is it a Tranny? Who knows? Who cares?

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Poland marches for European values - Our community...
Yuck! We celebrate poofters being married!?

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/11/13/13-nov-17-world-view-polands-independence-day-march-hijacked-by-right-wing-white-nationalists

Poland's Nationalist demonstrators burn flares and wave Polish flags ...

VERSUS



Australia's dykes on bikes and the police poofter patrol.

Do you march for faggotry?
Do you get on your knees for niggers?
Then you're a copper!

[Rev.Cambeul]

As the PC crowd jostle for position on the ladder of political correctness, who's left to keep the ladder propped up?

[Rev.Cambeul]

The Australian JOG has declared Same Sex Marriage legal. Fags and Dykes are reportedly rushing to wed ... presumably spitting in the faces of bakers while demanding their phallic and fish cakes, threatening to have them imprisoned for homophobia.

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/gay-marriage/in-the-wake-of-samesex-marriage-straight-couples-are-rushing-to-get-wed/news-story/4fc015b056b6822743918d52d61bd4ea

Tweet Removed by Twitter
twitter.com

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpkQxj8mkt8

Dyke Freaks
"What About Me?"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzQKECQgjW8