Main Menu
• Shortened Link: W23.link » CreativityAlliance.com
• Beat the Censors on Social Media with ᵂ23 ᴰᴼᵀ ᴸᴵᴺᴷ
• Free Pontifex Maximus @P.M.JoeEsposito USA - Refused Parole Due to Creativity
• Free @Rev.JoelDufresne P.O.W. USA - Prison Martyr - Bogus Charges
• Free @JamesCostello P.O.W. UK - 5 Years for Anti-Immigration Stickers
Join the Church of Creativity - Limited Time: Free Membership


Meet Australian Aborigines

Started by Rev.Cambeul, Wed 11 Mar 2020

Previous topic - Next topic

Rev.Cambeul


Total Aboriginal Population of Australia - 500K
Plus 300K frauds claiming to be Abo for the Black Privileges that come with it
Total Cost Per Annum: *$34 Billion by the Taxpayer (2023)
Divide that by 800K and you still don't have the full amount
* Amount does not take into account Welfare such as Unemployment & Pensions

Meet Australian Aborigines–They Make African Americans Look Like A Model Minority

Lance Welton witan@vdare.com | 14 March 2018

https://www.unz.com/article/meet-australian-aborigines-they-make-african-americans-look-like-a-model-minority


Inaugurating her Politically Correct remake of National Geographic, Editrix-In-Chief Susan Goldberg wrote recently: "Some of what you find in our archives leaves you speechless, like a 1916 story about Australia. Underneath photos of two Aboriginal people, the caption reads: 'South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings.'" [Link in original]. In fact, of course, this was a reasonably accurate description of Australia's aborigines. But as the usual Leftist suspects are engaged in the usual sort of campaign to guilt-trip the 92% of Australia's population who are of European descent out of the country they created, it's worth looking at what science has discovered about aborigines in the intervening century

Just as in the U.S., the campaign to remake Australia is accompanied by attacks on the statues of the settler people's icons. Thus vandals (probably not aborigines) sprayed across the statue of Australia's discoverer Captain Cook, which occupies pride of place in the centre of Sydney, the slogans "No Pride in Genocide" and "Change the Date" (of Australia Day, January 25, because it celebrates the arrival of British—and therefore unacceptable—settlers in 1788) [Paint poured over Captain Cook amid controversy over date of Australia Day, by Jonathan Pearlman, Telegraph, UK, January 25, 2018]'"

But unlike in the U.S. (yet), the Left wants to institutionalize its favored constituency's political power:

Australia, they insist, belongs only to its roughly 670,000 Aborigines, who make up 3% of its population."

Indeed, the Aborigines should be given a referendum on whether or not they should have a representative body, a 'Voice of Parliament.' In effect, this would be a third (albeit consultative) parliamentary chamber, voted for and stocked entirely by Aborigines.

When Cook and his men landed in Australia in 1770 and met the Aborigines they couldn't believe what they were confronted with. They recorded that they were "savages," "barbaric" and even "stupid"." And this wasn't just casual racism. They knew the people of Hawaii well and, though they regarded them as childlike, perceived them in much more positive terms.

The ancestors of Europeans and Asians split from the so-called "Eurasians" about 30,000 years ago. But the ancestors of the Aborigines split off about 75,000 years ago and made their way through Asia, where they inter-breed with the now extinct Denisovan Neanderthal-like sub-species, which also interbred with ancestors of Papua New Guineans." [An Aboriginal Australian Genome Reveals Separate Human Dispersals into Asia, by M. Rasmussen et al, Science. October 7, 2011]

Australia split from Papua New Guinea about 11,700 years ago. Aborigines were pretty much genetically isolated from then on, making them the most ancient population outside of Africa. Their closest genetic cousins are thus Papua New Guineans and Southeast Asians, though there is still a genetic chasm between them.

Despite the Aborigines sometimes being referred to as "blacks," only Amerindians ("Native Americans") are more genetically different from Africans than the Australian Aborigines." [Which population is most genetically distant from Africans? Amerindians, By Razib Khan, GNXP (Discover Magazine) August 19, 2010. Indeed, whites are actually closer genetically to Aborigines, although still very remote. And, paradoxically, African pygmies and Bushmen are genetically the most different from Aborigines, although occupying a similar hunter-gatherer niche, a phenomenon observed elsewhere in nature." [On Genetic Interests: Family, Ethnicity and Humanity in an Age of Mass Migration by Frank Salter, 2006, p. 68]

Aborigines have do fascinating evolutionary quirks, such as the ability to survive extremes of temperature, sleeping naked out of doors below freezing." Genetic mutation helps Aboriginal people survive tough climate, research finds By Caitlyn Gribbin, ABC, January 29 2014]. Although their environment is inhospitable, it is invariant—baking in the day and cold at night—and they're strongly evolved to these extremes, so little planning is necessary.


But, consistent with the perception that the Aborigines weren't very bright, we now know that at some point in their history they'd had sufficient ingenuity to be able to build relatively sturdy boats and make their way to the Torres Strait Islands, but by 1770, they had lost this knowledge. Indeed, the Australian archaeological record is replete with evidence of technological regression: some Aborigine tribes once farmed, some traded with Papua New Guineans, some tribes even "forgot" how to make the boomerang. [The curious case of the people who forgot how to fish, by Adam Benton, Evoanth.Net, April 15, 2014]

Perhaps fluctuations in the arid climate meant fluctuations in average intelligence as tiny populations, with mutually incomprehensible languages, meant that mutations for intelligence just couldn't spread.

British psychologist Richard Lynn, in his seminal study of race differences in IQ, Race and Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis, brings together all of the available studies on the intelligence of modern Aborigines. They have an average IQ of 64, compared to about 70 for Sub-Saharan Africans, 85 for African Americans and 100 for whites.

An IQ of below 70, in Western countries, has you classified as mentally retarded. So, the average 18-year-old Aborigine has the mental age of 11.


And it's not just low intelligence from which the Aborigines suffer. Like Native Americans, but unlike many African blacks, they never developed alcohol, leaving them strongly prone to alcoholism. And even compared to blacks, they are evolved to "live fast and die young"—a so-called fast Life History strategy which is an adaptation to an unstable ecology.

In such an unstable environment there was very little selection for cooperative groups and thus for Agreeableness, impulse control and mental stability. Thus while American Blacks are 12% of the US population and 38% of its prison population." Aborigines are 3% of the Australian population and, in 2009, 25% of its prison population." ["In charts: How Australia's prisoner population is booming". by Sophie Russell and Eileen Baldry, ABC News. June 13, 2017.]. In the UK, it has been found that 4% of whites and 10% of blacks have mental health problems—particularly schizophrenia in the case of blacks." It has been estimated that this is true of over 50% of Aborigines." [The pattern of psychiatric morbidity in a Victorian urban aboriginal general practice population, McKendrick J1, et al, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, March 1992]. The Native American suicide rate is 4 times the American national average." The Aborigine suicide rate is 7 times the Australian national average." The life expectancy of male Aborigines in 69, ten years lower than that of other Australians". They have high rates of dementia—12.4% compared to 2.4% among whites." [High prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment in Indigenous Australians, Neurology. November 2008]

The Aborigines were so "different" from any race that the European colonizers had ever seen—including Africans—that they weren't even sure they were human. Many concluded that they were not. As late as 1901, the Australian Parliament was debating the issue, though white Australians had long been interbreeding with them by then.

By the mid-twentieth century, such attitudes had obviously changed. But it was clear that if you left Australian Aborigines to raise their own children, then these children would often be subject to abuse and would never break out of the poverty in which they had been raised.

Left in their own "Indigenous Protected Areas," the living conditions of Australian Aborigines are extraordinarily poor, especially considering that, annually, $43,000 is spent on every Aborigine, compared to $21,000 dollars on everybody else." [ FactCheck Q&A: is $30 billion spent every year on 500,000 Indigenous people in Australia? The Conversation, September 5, 2016] In part, more money needs to be spent on Aborigines because they live in remote areas. But it is they who insist on living in these places which, therefore, lack proper sanitation and access to services, just as a European Australian would in such places. Extreme inertia, manifested in failure migrate out of chaos, is another correlate of very low IQ.

Accordingly, between 1910 and 1970, roughly a third of Aborigine children—those whose backgrounds were the most abusive—were removed from their parents and raised in foster homes, to give them some kind of chance.

This worked in the sense that, placed in cities, the Aborigine income and standard of living was higher than that of those who were not removed. They had about the same educational success as the "non-removed"—but the non-removed would have been from more stable backgrounds in the first place.

By the 1980s this paternalistic policy was being roundly condemned as removing these children, now known as "the Stolen Generation," from "their cultural heritage"—ignoring the fact that this heritage seems to include physical abuse, alcoholism, and high infant mortality. By 1998 the virtue-signalling frenzy was such that Australia held a "National Sorry Day" for the victims. The authors of the 1997 Bringing Them Home report on this policy described what had happened as "genocide.""

In 2008, the then-Labor Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, issued a formal apology to the Aborigines, drafted in consultation with Aborigine community leaders. [Rudd's apology to the Stolen Generation . By Tony Wright, The Age, February 14, 2008].

In his official response to Rudd's speech, Liberal Party Opposition Leader Brendon Nelson had the audacity to note that in 2006, a 4-year-old Aborigine girl had drowned while being raped by a teenage Aborigine who had been sniffing petrol. Two babies had been sexually assaulted while their mothers were away drinking and "another baby was stabbed by a man trying to kill her mother.""

Rudd's apology was broadcast on huge screens in public places. Nelson's response was booed, slow hand-clapped, and people turned their backs on the screen." [Rudd's latest sorry – to heckled Nelson, by Andrew Bolt Blog, Herald Sun, February 13, 2008]

But now the policy has stopped, and it is more difficult for Aborigines to escape poverty, so they complain about that. The succeeding initiative "Closing the Gap," which involves various forms of government intervention, is condemned as a new colonialism.

Of course, it will be obvious to VDARE.com readers why none of the policies work: they assume that Aborigine disadvantage is environment. But it's clearly significantly genetic—intelligence is about 80% genetic.

The Booker Prize-winning Australian novelist Peter Carey has stated that, as an Australian, 'You wake up in the morning and you are the beneficiary of genocide.'" [Guardian November 17, 2017 ]. But in reality, it is the Aborigines who should wake up in the morning and realise that they are the beneficiaries of a society and economy that they could never have created on their own.



Lance Welton witan@vdare.com is the pen name of a freelance journalist living in New York.
Reverend Cailen Cambeul, P.M.E.
Church Administrator, Creativity Alliance
Church of Creativity South Australia
Box 7051, West Lakes, SA, Australia, 5021

Email: Admin@creativityalliance.com
Crypto Coin Details in Forum Profile

Noli Nothis Permittere Le Terere
The only way to prevent 1984 is 2323
Joining the Creativity Alliance is Free
https://creativityalliance.com/join


"In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned.
When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."
Mark Twain.


Br.IanVonTurpie

Quote from: Lance Welton @ Vdare on Wed 11 Mar 2020Left in their own "Indigenous Protected Areas," the living conditions of Australian Aborigines are extraordinarily poor, especially considering that, annually, $43,000 is spent on every Aborigine, compared to $21,000 dollars on everybody else." [ FactCheck Q&A: is $30 billion spent every year on 500,000 Indigenous people in Australia? The Conversation, September 5, 2016] In part, more money needs to be spent on Aborigines because they live in remote areas. But it is they who insist on living in these places which, therefore, lack proper sanitation and access to services, just as a European Australian would in such places. Extreme inertia, manifested in failure migrate out of chaos, is another correlate of very low IQ.

They get a lot of money spent on them! Communities that basically are a "free ride/ free for all"! Houses that cost $800k AUD! To be "Boong proof" and built in remote locations. Logistically it's hard for workers and materials!

These "free for all's" have schools and clinics and a general store but not much else. If one does find a job, the remainder of their family come pay day, taxes the crap out of him leaving him with bugger all!

They just smash and neglect everything provided to them.

We keep them as "pets" for the sake of the UN, and basically stimulate the economy of those remote regions with welfare work!

The Germans seem like the only people that succeeded to do something much with them. There is evidence in Hermansburg mission that they worked and were schooled in German and English. The British in the region hated them because they attacked their telegraph stations! So the Abos sided with German missionaries.
The Price is Reich!

Find me on Stormfront as QueJumpingAfghan where I have been banned!
Formerly Based in the Northern Territory
Now in Adelaide, South Australia
The Whitest City in Australia
Click to see map of Australia
https://creativityalliance.com/join

Br.IanVonTurpie

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/aboriginal-artifacts-0012612

This is indeed a site for Creativity but I am posting these articles on here because I think they are an interesting read and it's good to know what other people think. You don't have to agree with it all . So take it with a grain of salt.


A group of extreme Christian missionaries is causing irreversible trouble in outback Wangkatjungka, in Australia, by burning sacred Aboriginal objects because they are "all from the devil", while believing that dead people can be reanimated. =))


Aboriginal Culture Branded 'Devil Worship'
An investigation by ABC's Background Briefing has revealed a group of Christian missionaries touting that traditional Aboriginal culture is devil worship, and according to ABC News they are burning sacred objects in the Australian Kimberley region and have dismantled and burned a spiritual law ground.
The Christian group, led by Tongan-born Pentecostal preacher Ana Makahununiu, aims to actively destroy 66,000 years of developed Aboriginal traditions and the charlatan also promises to bring people back from the dead, even though her efforts have clearly failed.
A Daily Mail report quoting Labor senator Pat Dodson says he described the group as "a type of virus with no real credibility" and that the gospel is about liberation, and this openly racist anti-Aboriginal group of God fearing born-again Christians are performing acts "of bastardry."
There are about 180 permanent residents in Wangkatjungka, and they have strong links to their desert culture. But the community suffers numerous social issues and perhaps this is why they have fallen victim to the ramblings of Ana Makahununiu.

Evil Cult Group Tries to Raise the Dead
Just like Hitler did with the Jews and Gypsies, this evil cult group is dehumanizing local people, and while Hitler stopped short of claiming divine reasoning, this self-obsessed narcissist, Ana Makahununiu, claims to be a "prophetess" who channels the word of God. Unfortunately, her God encourages its followers to burn "satanic objects" they claimed were cursing their community.
Believing the entire Aboriginal culture should be burned, the group also thinks that the resurrection of dead people can be achieved through prayer, which rings of deep rooted sociopathic tendencies involving adults who simply cannot imagine a world in which they are not there. This worrying level of undiagnosed mental health issues led the group to attempt resurrecting a baby girl at her funeral, delaying her burial "for several hours" while the deluded adults prayed for the baby to "wake."
The Wangkatjungka Cultural Bonfire
The trouble all started in 2015 with the arrival of the young Tongan preacher, Ana Makahununiu, in the Aboriginal community of Wangkatjungka. No sooner had she arrived before she began baptizing dozens of local people as "born again Christians" and gullible local women began calling her a "prophetess" – in reality she is a cultural huntress

It was a year after Makahununiu arrived that her followers built a massive bonfire to rid the world of "satanic objects" and filmed the whole ordeal.
A grainy video showing the raging bonfire includes people cheering as Aboriginal artifacts are thrown into the flames and one of the cult followers says that for many years "we have been deceived by Satan and his demonic beings." And if you are wondering what these Satanic curses consisted of that needed burning, one woman told ABC's Background Briefing that she was a smoker, and after the fire she never smoked again, and she "thanks the Lord for that

The Prophetess of Doom
Ms Makahununiu is not only a pathological liar, evident in her promising to bring dead people back to life, but also a parasite in that her followers "paid" for all her food and accommodation in Wangkatjungka for about three years.
She now lives in Sydney preaching her poison at a Pentecostal church in Homebush. Admitting to working cash-in-hand jobs, she makes no excuses for ripping off the Australian public admitting she's not legally allowed to work in Australia due to her visa status, thus paying no taxes


And in a shallow attempt at rationalizing burning Aboriginal artifacts, Makahununiu said her focus was for the people who were "addicted to drugs or alcohol, cigarettes, all those things." Because God manages cigarette and alcohol production companies, of course. And there seems no bounds to her narcissism which shines in her comment that the most important thing for her was to see the people happy "and free not to live in bondage" of satanic evil spirits.


The Real Motives of Ana Makahununiu
Nationally, alcohol causes cancer, injury and death and an Alcohol Rehab report estimates that over 3,000 deaths per year are linked with excessive consumption of alcohol in Australia, and over 5,000 (or 5 percent) of all cancers are due to chronic, long-term abuse of alcohol. What is more, excessive alcohol consumption is the cause of about 81,000 hospitalizations annually and between 2004 and 2005 this was estimated to cost the Australian community around to A$15 billion.
Why then did Ms Makahununiu not burn Australian football shirts in pubs in Sydney attempting to destroy the greater works of her Satan and his cultural curses? Why not? Because she would have been run out of town so quickly that her lying little legs wouldn't know what hit them, therefore, she hid herself in the outback, corrupting and poisoning the minds of more trusting indigenous folk.
And why might she now live in Sydney? Well there are only so many dead little girls that one "cannot" bring back to life before one has to find new victims to pay their way in life.




https://christianidentityaustralia.org/meet-the-real-first-australians/

Meet the Real First Australians
February 27, 2020 by Obadiah 1:18
A day does not pass here in the Land of Oz without whites being reminded by the unhallowed media that the dusky, angelic beings ungrammatically referred to as Aboriginals deserve unlimited amounts of cash and deference from us because of the Hitlerian behavior of our ancestors toward theirs. Aboriginal is an adjective, not a noun, e.g. Aboriginal art, Aboriginal history, Aboriginal quantum mechanics, but it's used as such by everyone who doesn't wish to come across as racist. In the beclouded minds of the politically correct, Aboriginal is a much more congenial term than the ridgy-didge noun Aborigine. Aborigine connotes primitiveness. Primitive customs, primitive dwellings, primitive physiognomy even. Aboriginal, however, has a softer, not-so-anthropological edge to it.

As Australia continues to shed its white European skin, the kowtowing to Abos (I use the term purely in a scientific sense) has become more frequent and pronounced. "The Traditional Owners of the Land" are now recognized at every major public ceremony and are the dominant point of discussion in every school class on Australian history. What have stupid-looking whites done for this desiccated slab of real estate, anyway? Places that once had European names, now have Abo names. Ayers Rock became Uluru. Diamond Valley became Nillumbik. And Birrarung Marr remained Birrarung Marr because you couldn't possibly come up with a more Abo-sounding name than that horrid conglomeration of syllables. Our national broadcaster, which swings so far to the left it ran Justin Trudeau off the road, places a warning for Abos at the start of every program it televises that contains images or references to their freshly dead. Blackfellas in mourning consider these things extremely offensive, you see. No expense or effort is spared, though, to not whack disclaimers on material offensive to the white Australian population. That is, all ten of us loopy enough to regard TV shows that popularize race-mixing, sexual degeneracy, and the demographic whittling away of whites through non-white immigration as offensive.

Aboriginals (sic) are great. Aboriginals (sic) are marvelous. Aboriginals (sic) are wonderful. Aboriginals (sic) are environmentally with-it demigods because they were the first Australians and were slapped around by slap-happy British colonists and descendants thereof.

But what if they weren't the first Australians? And what if they too turned out to be somewhat slap happy to persons not of their race?

In the first volume of his monumental work, History of Australia, the late, lauded historian, Manning Clark, discusses a race of pygmies called alternately negritos and Barrineans who lived in the tropical rainforests of North Queensland. Aborigines of the region knew them by a number of different tribal names, such as Djabuganjdji, Mbarbaram, and Yidinjdji. They were believed to have arrived in Australia more than 40,000 years ago. This places them on the continent at least 20,000 years before the Aborigines.

Prior to the Jewish-led push for Aboriginal rights in the early 1960s, the existence of this diminutive people was common knowledge among white Queenslanders. There were whites who'd met and even worked with them. But about 60 years ago, they were redacted from the pages of Australian history.

In their Quadrant article, The Extinction of the Australian Pygmies, Keith Windschuttle and Tim Gillin explain why the subject of Australian pygmies became largely verboten in academic and political circles.

No one today with a lay interest in Aboriginal anthropology, and few of those doing introductory courses in the subject, would ever find out that Australia had a pygmy people. What, then, has been going on? Why would these people have been expunged from popular memory? How did the Australian pygmies become extinct within the public consciousness?

There have been two main reasons. We explain them in detail below but, briefly, they were: first, a vitriolic debate within the academic discipline of anthropology in which the view prevailed that there was nothing remarkable about these people; second, the emergence in the 1960s of the radical Aboriginal political movement, which found the existence of a pygmy people an inconvenient counter-example to one of its central doctrines. As a result, these indigenous Australians have been subject to an airbrushing from history that makes even that of the old Bolshevik leadership of the USSR in the 1930s look mild by comparison.
An "inconvenient counter example" indeed, but, as we shall see, not just because the pygmies predated the so-called first Australians.

At the time, Tindale and the American academic, Joseph Birdsell, were engaged in the most extensive project ever mounted in Australian physical anthropology to measure a large sample of Aborigines according to their weight, stature and a number of other bodily characteristics. They found the prospect of discovering a group in the Queensland rainforests so at variance with the norm, irresistible.

They also knew that, since the nineteenth century, there had been a number of theories about the origins of the Aborigines and the migration of ancient peoples to the Australian continent. In 1927, in his book, Environment and Race, the controversial Sydney geographer, Griffith Taylor, had speculated that several waves of Aboriginal migrants had swept before them an even older "Negrito" race. Maybe these rainforest people held the key to the story.
"Swept before them an even older 'Negrito' race . . ." Or, to put it another way, the Aborigines killed the pygmies because they occupied land the Aborigines coveted.

If this troublesome truth became public knowledge, it would bring the immense Aboriginal rights machine to a screeching, permanent halt. The Aborigines could no longer lay claim to being Australia's first inhabitants nor elicit billions of taxpayer dollars because of past mistreatment from whites, not after driving the country's genuine first inhabitants to virtual extinction

Now, in case anyone thinks I may have misinterpreted the authors' words to fit my ultra-racist view of the world, here's what they have to write later in their article:

The Sixties movement adopted the anti-imperialist rhetoric then prevalent in southeast Asia and Africa. British colonialism had caused indigenous oppression and dispossession, they argued, so all Aborigines should come together to reject the hegemony of white Australia. Although this was primarily a movement of radical urban blacks trying to create a constituency among dispersed Aborigines in rural areas, the appeal galvanized considerable support, especially among white sympathizers.

Their appeal to pan-Aboriginalism, the notion that all Australian indigenous people had a common political interest, was always dependent on the idea that they were one people. (The only exception allowed was that of the Torres Strait Islanders, who were later defined as a separate entity.) Their politics were based on the claim that they were the original owners of the continent who had been dispossessed by the British. They did not want to allow there might be a hierarchy of claims for arrival, and thus ownership, among Aborigines themselves. So anyone who argued against the "one people" thesis would be seen as betraying the pan-Aboriginal movement and undermining Aboriginal political aspirations.

Moreover, the moral appeal of the activists' case would have been weakened by the notion that there had been several waves of Aboriginal migrants, each of whom had violently dispossessed the other. Rather than a story of aggressive white imperialists disrupting an arcadian Aboriginal people living in harmony with one another and their environment, the long term history of Australian habitation would have resembled more that of humanity at large where the stronger have pushed aside the weaker, irrespective of the colour of either side. Hence, instead of a simple moral tale of goodies and baddies, the history of this continent would have reflected more the hard reality of the human condition everywhere.
I won't condemn abos for killing the pygmies. They simply did what numerous races of people have been doing since the beginning of recorded history: acquire land and resources by right of conquest. A right customarily exercised with great bloodshed. But this, of course, does not fit the good-Abos-bad-whites fable Jews have concocted to convince us white Aussies that the smallest expression of racial pride on our part will ultimately lead to the genocide of millions of peaceable non-whites here and abroad. If we're scared or ashamed to delight in our DNA, then we'll do bugger all to stop foreign invaders from consigning us to the same fate as the long-forgotten Australian pygmies

The Bible states that the earth is the Lord's and the fullness thereof (Psalm 24:1). God is the traditional owner of this land, of all lands. He didn't set aside Australia for pygmies, Aborigines, Chinese, Lebanese, or anyone else but His Elect, the pure white race. The day we collectively repent of transgressing His Law is the day He will give Australia back to us
The Price is Reich!

Find me on Stormfront as QueJumpingAfghan where I have been banned!
Formerly Based in the Northern Territory
Now in Adelaide, South Australia
The Whitest City in Australia
Click to see map of Australia
https://creativityalliance.com/join

Br.IanVonTurpie

Indigenous Arts - Hickory Dickory Dock by Baker Boy



This video has been created for Remote Abo Learning use during Victoria's second lockdown. Student's are learning about Indigenous Arts and Artists in Performing Arts.
The Price is Reich!

Find me on Stormfront as QueJumpingAfghan where I have been banned!
Formerly Based in the Northern Territory
Now in Adelaide, South Australia
The Whitest City in Australia
Click to see map of Australia
https://creativityalliance.com/join

Br.IanVonTurpie

https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2021/05/11/boy-killed-garbage-truck

A boy Boong kid who was asleep in an industrial bin has died, after the bin was collected by a garbage truck at Port Lincoln on South Australia's Eyre Peninsula.

SA Police said the boy was one of three – aged 11, 12 and 13 – who were inside the bin as it was being emptied just after 5.20am


One of the boys managed to jump out, but the 13-year-old sustained serious injuries and died at the scene.

The third boy was not injured, police said.

Police said the three boys, all from Port Lincoln, "were allegedly asleep in an industrial bin when the bin was being emptied".

"It is believed the truck driver was unaware the boys were in the bin at the time and is extremely shaken by the incident," police said in a statement.

Police have described the boy's death as "tragic" and said a report would be prepared for the coroner.

SafeWork SA has been advised of the incident.

Port Lincoln Mayor Brad Flaherty has expressed his condolences to the victim's loved ones.

"It's a terrible, terrible incident that will have an awful impact on the community as a whole and the families involved," he said.

The area has been cordoned off, and State Emergency Service personnel are also in attendance.

Police are expected to provide more details at a media conference early this afternoon in Port Lincoln


B.F.I. = Black Family Inside

What 13 year old in Port Lincoln sleeps in a dumpster at 5:20 am? A stinky Boong of course! Where are the parents? They should all go be put in the dumpster!
The Price is Reich!

Find me on Stormfront as QueJumpingAfghan where I have been banned!
Formerly Based in the Northern Territory
Now in Adelaide, South Australia
The Whitest City in Australia
Click to see map of Australia
https://creativityalliance.com/join

Similar topics (5)

 
 
Church Links Holy Books W.R.L. Friends Holoco$t Links
 

Legal Notices
Due to a 2003 CE decision in the US 7th Circuit Court Of Appeals, the name “Church of the Creator” is the trademarked property of a Christian entity known as TE-TA-MA Truth Foundation-Family of URI®. Use of the name “Church of the Creator” in any context is historical, and is presented for educational purposes only. The Church of Creativity makes no attempt to assume or supersede the trademark. Trademark remains with the trademark holder. [More ...]
 
The Church of Creativity is a Professional, Non-Violent, Progressive Pro-White Religion. We promote White Civil Rights, White Self-Determination, and White Liberation via 100% legal activism. We do not promote, tolerate nor incite illegal activity. [More ...]



Creator Origins
Church of the Creator: Founded by Ben Klassen - Year Zero (1973CE)
Your Own Creator Forum: Continuously Online Since 25AC (1998CE)
Creativity Alliance & Church of Creativity: Founded 30AC (2003CE)
Links: The History of Creativity | The Creator Calendar Explained
» Save the White Race - Join the Church of Creativity «

23 Words
What is good for the White Race is of the Highest Virtue;
What is bad for the White Race is the Ultimate Sin.


Main Website   Forum RSS Feed   Send Mail   About Us
Copyright © 30 AC - AC (2003 CE - CE), Creativity Alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Back to the Top