Jewish Supremacists Lead Minorities Blocking Repeal of Hate Laws

[Rev.Cambeul]

The whining black bitch that is the African community of South Australia has now jumped on the band wagon, claiming themselves to be the eternal victims of evil Whitey.

And the story is brought to you by the Marxist whore of Australian journalism herself, Tory Shepherd.


South Australia's African community tells Prime Minister Tony Abbott about culture of racial vilification in community they face daily

Tory Shepherd | The Adelaide Advertiser | 09 July 2014

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/south-australias-african-community-tells-prime-minister-tony-abbott-about-culture-of-racial-vilification-in-community-they-face-daily/story-fni6uo1m-1226983601954?from=public_rss

RACISM is an everyday experience for Africans in South Australia, the Federal Government has been told.

The African Community Organisation of SA has written to Prime Minister Tony Abbott regarding the proposed changes to racial vilification laws saying there is a "culture of vilification" in the community.

"There is no day that passes that I don't hear of racial vilification in the community, either by emails, telephone, and radio or even in person," the organisation's President David Malinda has written.

"Most Africans experience racial and discriminatory behaviours in the workplace, schools, community access/funding, sports, local governance, business and at universities because there is a culture of vilification that has never had a strong government that puts laws that make it a criminal case to racially abuse people of different races."

Mr Malinda told The Advertiser yesterday that racism can begin with vilification, but bubble over into violence.

The organisation wanted the Racial Discrimination Act kept as it is. [more ...]

[Rev.Cambeul]

The Jew gets its own way - Who rules Australia's political landscape now?


Australian Jews Block Change in Local Race-Hate Laws

JTA - Times of Israel

http://www.timesofisrael.com/australian-jews-block-change-in-local-race-hate-laws

Jewish community leaders welcomed the Australian government's decision to scrap plans to repeal parts of the nation's race-hate laws. Prime Minister Tony Abbott had pledged to dilute sections of the Racial Discrimination Act in a bid to safeguard freedom of speech, but when the government asked for community consultation, it received a chorus of condemnation, led by the Jewish community. On Tuesday, Abbott announced the government's plans are "off the table." ... Jewish leaders have previously used section 18c of the law to litigate successfully against Holocaust deniers, anti-Semites and religious extremists, and lobbied heavily against the government's proposed changes.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Australian PM Caves in to Jewish Lobby on Free Speech Laws

Brenton Sanderson | Occidental Observer | 14 August 2014

http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/australian-pm-caves-in-to-jewish-lobby-on-free-speech-laws

Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott claims that all Australians are Jewish

In the face of a coordinated and sustained campaign initiated and led by Jewish activists, the Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has abandoned his 2013 election promise to water down or remove Section 18C of Australia's Racial Discrimination Act which makes it unlawful to act in a manner likely to "offend, insult, humiliate or intimidate" someone on the basis of race. Abbott said he had made a "leadership decision" to walk away from his pledge despite having promised to remove this outrageous restriction on the free speech after the law was used successfully against conservative columnist Andrew Bolt in 2011.

It is a measure of the power wielded by organized Jewry in Australia that the Prime Minister would rather damage his political credibility by breaking a clear election promise than suffer the consequences of defying the single most powerful group in Australian society. Abbott, who made the announcement while outlining an extension of anti-terrorism laws, attempted to justify his broken promise by claiming "I don't want to do anything that puts our national unity at risk at this time and so those proposals are now off the table." Abbott's apparent desire to not further alienate Australia's problematic Islamic community by repealing Section 18C (at a time when the government is set to strengthen laws against terrorism) is an obvious political smokescreen. The veteran Jewish journalist, Michael Gawenda, writing in the Business Spectator, identified the real reason behind the Prime Minister walking away from his election commitment:

https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c

While Abbott said that the decision to ditch the plan to rid the Racial Discrimination Act of section 18C was taken because of "complications" in dealing with Islamic communities in the context of the proposed tough new terrorism laws, it seems likely that more was involved in this decision. The conflict in Gaza and the coverage and reaction to this appalling, heartbreaking conflagration, in my opinion, made it virtually certain that any move to change or abolish section 18C would extract too high a political price.

The repeal of section 18C was vigorously opposed by the leadership of virtually every ethnic community in the country. But it would be fair to say — without wishing to give succor to those who reckon the Jews are too powerful — that Jewish community leaders have played a crucial role in organizing the opposition to any potential change to the RDA.  It is the opposition of the Jewish communal leaders that had been of major concern to [Attorney General] Brandis and, to a significant extent, Tony Abbott.

Gawenda notes that the Jewish community's overwhelming support for Section 18C (which was itself originally the legislative result of submissions by organized Jewry to the National Inquiry into Racist Violence and the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody in 1995) is linked to the broader Jewish commitment to "multiculturalism" in Australia.

https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c

The main reason that Brandis and Abbott were most concerned about the opposition of the Jewish communal leadership to any changes to section 18C is because the Jewish community is generally seen as a role model for successful multiculturalism. It is for these reasons that the Jewish communal leadership has played such an outsized role in the campaign against the watering down or elimination of section 18C. If the Jewish community is a prime example of successful multiculturalism, then its support for the retention of 18C, its highly effective campaign against any change to the RDA on the basis that any change would seriously undermine multiculturalism and free the racists to say whatever they please, represented serious political pain for Brandis and Abbott.

Gawenda is disingenuous in claiming that the source of the Jewish community's power in this debate resides in its being a "role model for successful multiculturalism" rather than in its status as a group with the kind of financial, political and media clout to instil genuine fear in those who oppose its interests. As in the United States, Jewish money exerts a dominating influence over Australian politics, which guarantees that most politicians are willing to put the Australian Defense Forces (and Australian taxpayers) to the service of an ethno-nationalist state in which Australia has no economic or strategic interest. The Jewish academic and activist Dan Goldberg acknowledges that: "The annual report of the Australian Electoral Commission always includes Jewish names and Jewish-owned companies donating large sums to both sides of politics."(i)

The sway held by organized Jewry over Australia's political leaders was highlighted earlier this year when the former Foreign Minister Bob Carr hit out at the "pro-Israel lobby in Melbourne," saying it wielded "extraordinary influence" on Australia's foreign policy during his time in former Prime Minister Julia Gillard's cabinet. Asked how the lobby achieved this influence he said: "I think party donations and a program of giving trips to MPs and journalists to Israel. But that's not to condemn them. I mean, other interest groups do the same thing. But it needs to be highlighted because I think it reached a very unhealthy level." Carr's observations were later corroborated by the former [Jewish] Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser who said Carr was "absolutely correct" in his view that the Jewish lobby wielded too much power.

Gawenda asserts that, unlike the vast majority of Australian Jews, he was originally in favor of the proposal to water down Section 18C of the Act until recent events gave him pause for thought: in particular the widespread criticism of Israel and its supporters for their attempts to justify the appalling massacre of Palestinian civilians in Gaza:

https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c

But here's the thing. I believe that in recent days, in the light of what has been published about Jews and the conflict in Gaza, the clearly anti-Semitic cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald, for instance — for which the SMH has issued an apology in an editorial that I found unsatisfactory —\ not to mention the astounding amount of outright racist filth to be found on social media, it may no longer be the case that we can trust editors and executive producers when it comes to ensuring that what amounts to vilification is not given any room in mainstream commentary and analysis.

So, for Gawenda, the recent (and entirely legitimate) criticism of the actions of the ethno-nationalist state of Israel and its Zionist cheerleaders in the West only serves to confirm that Jewish leaders were right to oppose any changes to Section 18C. The criticism of the Israeli government and those who would defend its barbarity in Gaza simply confirms for Gawenda that Australians cannot be trusted with unfettered free speech. Incidentally, the supposedly "anti-Semitic" cartoon in the Sydney Morning Herald to which he refers is less an anti-Semitic caricature and more an accurate representation of actual events — of Israeli citizens sitting outside to watch and cheer the bombing of the helpless Palestinian civilians as entertainment.

Likewise, for the Australian Jewish academic and activist Danny Ben-Moshe, the slaughter in Gaza "has led to the crossing of new anti-Semitic thresholds with the potential to take us down a dangerous path. It is a path not laid with guns and bullets, but with loose and manipulative language."  According to Gawenda, it was the sudden outbreak of truth-telling about Israel and the dishonesty of its apologists that reinvigorated the campaign by Australian Jewish leaders to oppose any changes to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act:

https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2014/8/6/national-affairs/real-reason-abbott-broke-his-promise-section-18c

It is this that made Jewish community leaders more determined than ever to oppose any change to section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. And in the main, Jews in Australia support the communal leadership on this issue. No one can doubt that there has been an alarming rise in anti-Semitism in Europe, something that is hardly reported in most of the Australian media. Jews feel under threat — in some cases physical threat — in France and Belgium and Germany and even in England. Not to mention Hungary, where an openly anti-Semitic party has garnered significant support. Thousands of French Jews have left France for Israel and other places. The numbers leaving every month are growing.

Though there has not been a similar rise in virulent anti-Semitism in Australia, Jews in Australia nevertheless have good reason to believe that if the virus of anti-Semitism is spreading in Europe, it might one day reach these shores. In this environment, Tony Abbott decided that the plan to change section 18C, a solemn promise he had made to Bolt and to his supporters at the Institute of Public Affairs had to be abandoned. Will there be a better political time to resurrect these proposed changes? Almost certainly not.

Note the standard pathologization of anti-Jewish sentiment as a "virus" that has nothing whatever to do with Jewish behavior. On the other hand, the reflexive Jewish hostility toward Europeans (which has led to the demographic transformation of Western nations over the last few decades) is apparently not a virus, but stems, rather, from some highly developed sense of fairness and universal brotherhood that is inherent in all Jews. Of course, what Gawenda won't acknowledge is that the only reason Jews are increasingly subject to anti-Semitic attacks in countries like France and England is because of mass non-White (particularly Muslim) immigration and multiculturalism — both of which are the malignant outgrowths of Jewish ethnic activism.

A disappointed Andrew Bolt observed that Jewish leaders would ultimately regret opposing changes to the Act, noting that: "The Jewish leaders now should look very, very deeply into their souls at what they have helped wrought and ask themselves, are you seriously safer now as a result?" Bolt's reasoning is that under Section 18C Australian Jews will in future be precluded from criticizing the beliefs and actions of a growing and increasingly militant Australian Islamic community which will be increasingly hostile to Israel and the interests of Australian Jews.

As with Gawenda, Bolt fails to mention that the only reason there are any Muslims in Australia at all (with all their myriad problems and social dysfunctions) is because Jewish activism succeeded in ending the White Australia policy and establishing multiculturalism as the basis for social policy in Australia. As The Jewish academic Dan Goldberg proudly acknowledges: "In addition to their activism on Aboriginal issues, Jews were instrumental in leading the crusade against the White Australia policy, a series of laws from 1901 to 1973 that restricted non-White immigration to Australia." It is clear that the Jewish fear and loathing of White Australia trumps any concern about the anti-Semitic tendencies among non-White immigrants that are being imported into the nation.

The Jewish writer Peta Jones-Pellach is not alone in expressing the view that Australian Jews should always back the Muslim minority in any conflict with White Australia, arguing that "We recognize that our ongoing harmonious acceptance into the Australian community depends on forging bonds with the increasing numbers of non-Jewish Australians who might be our theological opponents or even our enemies."[ii] The supposed benefits to Australian Jewry that multiculturalism has bestowed – most notably the diminished threat of the emergence of a mass movement of anti-Semitism from White Australians — is seen as having far outweighed any negative effects of large scale Islamic immigration such as the fact that: "Some Australian Jews fear that migrants arriving from Muslim countries will contribute to anti-Semitic currents in Australia, inflame extremist groups and pose a threat to the relative peace they currently enjoy."[iii]

The rise of Islamic anti-Semitism in the West reveals a paradoxical element of the overwhelming Jewish support for multiculturalism; an element which resulted in the emergence and growth of neoconservatism. Kevin MacDonald notes that: "Although multiculturalist ideology was invented by Jewish intellectuals to rationalize the continuation of separatism and minority-group ethnocentrism in a modern Western state, several of the recent instantiations of multiculturalism may eventually produce a monster with negative consequences for Judaism."[iv] Australian Jewish activists like Dan Goldberg recognize the danger, and he notes that:

Herein lies an underlying tension that exists in the psyche of Australian Jews in the new millennium: on the one hand understanding the fundamental wrong in tarring all Muslims with the same extremist brush; on the other hand feeling great unease in showing support for Muslims, some of whose brothers are waging jihad against Israel and the Jews. ... Many Australian Jews are therefore caught between these tides, ostensibly supportive of minority rights but cognizant of the fact that among the Muslim community are radical elements who seek our destruction. [v]

Despite these concerns, most Australian Jews see themselves as the longer-term beneficiaries of policies explicitly designed to dilute the power of the traditional European-derived Australian majority. Australian Jewry has therefore sought to make alliances with various immigrant groups in opposition to the White majority, including Muslims. Attempts to form a political coalition with Australian Muslims date from the earliest days of Australian multiculturalism. Australian Jews sought Muslim support for the enactment of the racial discrimination legislation recommended by the Lippmann-chaired Committee on Community Relations in the mid-1970s. In the years since, Jews have repeatedly sought the support of the Muslim community in lobbying for various multicultural policies, including those relating to "access to government services, recourse for victims of discrimination, and protection from harassment." Jewish activism organizations such as the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council was quick to enlist Australia's Muslim leaders in their campaign to oppose any changed to Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act.

According to Jeremy Jones, the director of international and community affairs of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, "the relationship between Australian Jews and Muslims has developed positively over the past decade." Nevertheless, he believes that "maintaining the momentum will require leadership and determination, but there are good grounds for optimism given the network of relations and shared fruitful experiences in contemporary multicultural Australia."

Clearly, Australian Jewry believes that, despite the threat to Jews represented by the strong anti-Jewish sentiment in growing sections of the Australian Islamic community, the relationship is basically manageable in the longer-term.

Having won the battle over Section 18C, it is certain that activist Jews will push for even tougher restrictions on freedom of speech in Australia, and indeed throughout the West. The attempt to confine public discourse to within parameters that do not threaten Jewish interests has been a central preoccupation of Jewish activists for many decades. American Jewish activist organizations like the ADL and the SPLC certainly do not view the American constitution as an insuperable barrier to the imposition of laws like to Section 18C in the United States.



(i) Goldberg, D. (2006) 'After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews,' In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski, Black Inc., Melbourne. 151 [ii] Peta Jones Pellach, "Interfaith Dialogue and the State of Israel," In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne, Black Inc., 2006), 139. [iii] Marcus Einfeld, "We Too Have Been Strangers: Jews and the Refugee Struggle," In: New Under the Sun – Jewish Australians on Religion, Politics & Culture, Ed. Michael Fagenblat, Melanie Landau & Nathan Wolski (Melbourne: Black Inc., 2006), 311 & 314. [iv] MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth‑Century Intellectual and Political Movements, (Westport, CT: Praeger, Revised Paperback edition, 2001), 313. [v] Goldberg "After 9/11: The Psyche of Australian Jews," 145 & 146

[Rev.Cambeul]

#JeSuisCharlesMartel Any of the officialdom from Australia currently talking about the Charlie Hebdo slayings in France as being an attack on freedom of speech is a hypocrite! And here's the proof ...


Being Charlie — with 18c in place, Australia says 'non'

Joe Kelly | The Australian | 13 January 2015

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/terror/being-charlie-with-18c-in-place-australia-says-non/story-fnpdbcmu-1227182736935

SATIRICAL French publication Charlie Hebdo could not be printed in Australia under existing restrictions on free speech, despite its cartoons being embraced across the world as a symbol of Western liberties after the massacre at its offices.

Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson told The Australian the restrictions contained in section 18c of the Racial Discrimin�ation Act would "ensure it would be shut down"; he was supported in this position by media law �experts.

The carnage in Paris has also encouraged two Liberal MPs to publicly call for the debate about changes to section 18c to be re-opened after the government last year unceremoniously dropped its planned reforms following a fierce public [Jewish supremacist led, Abo and Muslim] backlash.

Mr Wilson, dubbed the "freedom commissioner", has taken aim at opponents of the 18c changes who are now rhetorically embracing free speech, warning that words needed to be backed up with concrete action.

Failure to do so would be seen as hypocritical, he said.

"The Charlie Hebdo attack is a wake-up call for a lot of people who rhetorically support free speech but when it comes to the nub would choose political �advantage over sensible reform," he said.

"This is where they have an opportunity to rise to the challenge, like the leaders of Europe are now doing, rather than being held out as hypocrites."

In The Australian today, the chairman of the parliamentary joint committee on human rights, West Australian senator Dean Smith, challenges Tony Abbott and Bill Shorten to support a private senator's bill proposing a middle pathway forward on an 18c overhaul.

The Opposition Leader yesterday indicated he remained unmoved on 18c.

{SNIP}

While Mr Wilson argued that many of the religiously themed cartoons in Charlie Hebdo would not fall foul of the discrimination act, he said that racial stereo�typing of Jews and other ethnic groups would create too many legal issues for such a publication to continue in an Australian context.

"18c only covers issues of race and ethnic origin, which would cover some of the material but not all of it," he said. "It would cover Jews and ethnic representations, but it wouldn't cover Muslims and other bits. In the end, the legal problems would essentially ensure it would be shut down.

"I think there are lots of different avenues for reform, but I think there are more issues than just 18c that need to be considered."

Senator Smith threw his support behind Mr Wilson, but urged for a renewed focus on 18c. He is urging both sides of politics to back a private senator's bill he has co-sponsored with Family First senator Bob Day, Liberal Democrat David Leyonhjelm and Liberal colleague Cory Bernardi.

Senator Smith says the bill could form a "legislative monument to the human price paid by France" and would simply remove the words "offend" and "insult" in a finetuning of 18c.

"By agreeing (to the bill) ... Tony Abbott and Bill Shorten will have kept the protections against �'humiliate' and 'intimidate'," he writes. "Our leaders have read the mood with precision and Tony Abbott is right to remind us to be prepared to 'speak up for our �beliefs' and 'call things as we see them'. It is now time to crown our words of vigilance with a deed."

Senator Bernardi said he absolutely supported the passage of the bill.

Simon Breheny, the director of the legal rights project at the Institute of Public Affairs, told The Australian that Charlie Hebdo's cartoons certainly "would have been caught in Australia by section 18c of the Racial Discrimin�ation Act".

"Even if it wasn't caught by section 18c, there is no doubt they would have fallen foul of restrictive state racial and religious vilification laws. This is one of the possible explanations as to why we don't have any kind of publi�cations in Australia quite like it, because our laws restricting freedom of speech are so severe."

Legal experts also united to suggest that Charlie Hebdo would be unlikely to meet the existing tests enshrined in current Australian law, pointing out that satirical cartoons do not occupy the same status in Australian culture.

"You would have a complaint if those sorts of cartoons were to run here," said Minter Ellison Partner and Fairfax media lawyer in Victoria Peter Bartlett.

"I think they would certainly, run up against 18c and we would receive complaints and we would then need to deal with those �complaints."

Mr Bartlett also warned that there was already "some evidence of self-censoring", given the �caution around the existing racial discrimination laws.

Justin Quill, a media lawyer used by The Australian, said the publication would have "serious difficulties" and would constantly need to justify its actions. "If someone took action against them — probably more than once — it ultimately would mean that it would be difficult to survive and it could mean it had to be shut down," he said.

"I can easily say I think there would be occasions where it would lose an 18c argument.

"It's easy for those who support 18c to say 'I think they wouldn't'. What is clear is that the publication would have to successfully bear the onus of proof in proving their defence."

[W.Anthony]

Whoa, I had no idea Holocaust denial was illegal in Australia. Then again, it's illegal here too. Not in the law of course, but no one seems to protest when men like Ernst Zundel are deported because they denied the Holocaust.
Tread carefully my brothers.

[Rev.Cambeul]

Whoa, I had no idea Holocaust denial was illegal in Australia.

It's not illegal, but they will Zundel you here if they can. Typically, as happened with Doctor Frederick Toben, they will gather their money and lawyers, make a private application to the court to find your words and actions to be offensive to their Semitic sensibilities, and the court will guaranteed judge you to be guilty, judge you to be recalcitrant, judge your words to be a physical threat, hand down orders, fine and sentence you - all at the orders of some Jew that has a private grudge with you. In Australia, that's the leaders of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry - which comes under orders from the same old B'nai Brith bunch that rule every other Jewish Supremacist organisation in the world at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer.

These days, whenever they mention Doctor Toben in their libellous outpourings, they usually mention me as well. The reason they went after Doctor Toben privately through the courts and leave me alone, is because Doctor Toben had something to lose; while I have nothing. It can also be argued that Doctor Toben's publicly state views - like Zundel's - were his views, and his alone. And without him around, his compatriots would disappear completely. While I represent a religious organisation that the Jewish Supremacists denounce at every opportunity, but recognise that our Holy Books, recordings and other texts are legally less offensive than is their Torah - the First Testament of the Christian Bible. Their Jewish scripture actually calls variously for the conquest, extermination and enslavement of entire races of people opposed to Jews; while ours merely points out that the Jew is doing exactly that at this very moment to the White Race through lawfare, and that it is the Holy Duty of our Creed to resist the Jew on all fronts. Further, if the Jew and its JOG allies go one step further and cease to follow their own rules of law and order and persecution and murder of CREATORS becomes the order of the day, then we will fight back in what will be a Bloody Racial War. A RaHoWa that will begin with the deaths of the Rabbis at CREATOR hands. That is all part of our Creed and often used out of context against us, but it is something we will only do, if we have no choice other than to stand and be murdered as per Rabbinic order.

@Cailen.