2006-02-01 Australia: We Will Survive - Ban Hate Website

[Rev.Cambeul]

2006-02-01 We Will Survive - Ban Hate Website



https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=1404

Note: The Creativity Alliance was formerly known as the White Crusaders of the RaHoWa
http://www.google.com/search?q=white+crusaders+of+the+rahowa



Head of News, Advertiser Newspapers Ltd
Paul Starick

https://twitter.com/paulstarick
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/paul-starick/18/210/b78
http://www.myspace.com/87399961



"Talk Back" commenter, Dimity Gill, is no innocent member of the public either. She is a trusted employee of News Limited/the Adelaide Advertiser:

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/help/contactus
Sales Manager - CareerOne
Dimity Gill

Ph: (08) 8206 2562
Fax: (08) 8206 3626
email: gilld@adv.newsltd.com.au
http://au.linkedin.com/pub/dimity-gill/28/88/697

Known White Activists should not expect to gain employment through Rupert Murdoch's CareerOne as run by Dimity Gill. [I know I haven't ~ Cailen.]

Give Dimity and Paul a call and remind them that we Creators have long memories.

[Grimm]

Hmm.. "White Crusaders of the RaHoWa" I think "Creativity Alliance" sounds better for this kind of site. The "White Crusaders of the RaHoWa" reminds me of a "Knights Templar" or "Knights of Columbus" sect. The information is still good though. If the government is going to take away your right to be a vent, the pressure is just going to back up until someone explodes. Maybe thats what it would take though because expressing the views to someone in private and being able to say with all actuality that expressing your non-violent message is punishable by law would make others more immediatly sympathetic to your cause, or maybe not even your cause but protecting your right to express yourself.  if you were running around saying "We gotta hang up some niggers now!" swinging a rope and shooting an AK47 into the air (using blanks so its just a prop.) a lot of people would have no problem turning a blind eye to "the man" shutting you down, but a simple "Let me tell you about Ben Klassen", "Lets have a brief word about historical events.", or "How about we spend a few mins talking about opinions on politics, religion, and race?" is a lot harder to get public support for shutting you down.

What would be next? Banning talking about music groups because the content is questionable?

[Rev.Cambeul]

Hmm.. "Crusaders of the RaHoWa" I think "Creativity Alliance" sounds better for this kind of site. The "Crusaders of the RaHoWa" reminds me of a "Knights Templar" or "Knights of Columbus" sect.

You're damned right Creativity Alliance sounds better than White Crusaders of the RaHoWa. You have to remember that the name WCOTR evolved out of necessity - not by a conscious choice, and we were naive enough to think that if we could get used to it, others would accept it. We learned otherwise.

And yes, you are right about not ramming our beliefs down people's throats whether they want them or not. We have to be more civilised, wise to the con of the Marxist ad nauseam, and more creative than our opponents.

Paul Starick took my reply to his "Authorities investigate Adelaide website RACE HATE BASE" article from the day before, and used it out of context in an effort to make us appear as violent as possible - like terrorists as Starick's fellow employee, Dimity Gill pointed out. The quotes that Starick used are of course from Creativity's founder, Ben Klassen, and were basically an explanation that if the prevailing system fails to comply with its own rule of law and instead removes our right to freedom of religion, then we will fight back. If that same prevailing society decides to look the other way, or participate in the murder of Creators - as has happened with other religious groups in the past - then we will turn on all of our enemies and fight back with all the force we can muster.

When law and persuasion can no longer protect our rights to survival ... then we must turn on our tormentors and destroy them down to the last man.

@Cailen.