Topics

The Enemy Within

[(SHOCKING) Israeli Terrorism and the Talmud]

(SHOCKING) Israeli Terrorism and the Talmud

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BEYwTb6ZC9U

[Let's celebrate human genetic diversity]

Let's celebrate human genetic diversity - Except unique Jews or you are anti-Semitic

(((Bruce Lahn))) and (((Lanny Ebenstein))) | 8 October 2009

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7265/full/461726a.html

Promoting biological sameness in humans is illogical, even dangerous
To ignore the possibility of group diversity is to do poor science and poor medicine
A robust moral position is one that embraces this diversity as among humanity's great assets

Science is finding evidence of genetic diversity among groups of people as well as among individuals. This discovery should be embraced, not feared, say Bruce T. Lahn and Lanny Ebenstein.

A growing body of data is revealing the nature of human genetic diversity at increasingly finer resolution. It is now recognized that despite the high degree of genetic similarities that bind humanity together as a species, considerable diversity exists at both individual and group levels (see box, page 728). The biological significance of these variations remains to be explored fully. But enough evidence has come to the fore to warrant the question: what if scientific data ultimately demonstrate that genetically based biological variation exists at non-trivial levels not only among individuals but also among groups? In our view, the scientific community and society at large are ill-prepared for such a possibility. We need a moral response to this question that is robust irrespective of what research uncovers about human diversity. Here, we argue for the moral position that genetic diversity, from within or among groups, should be embraced and celebrated as one of humanity's chief assets.

The current moral position is a sort of 'biological egalitarianism'. This dominant position emerged in recent decades largely to correct grave historical injustices, including genocide, that were committed with the support of pseudoscientific understandings of group diversity. The racial-hygiene theory promoted by German geneticists Fritz Lenz, Eugene Fischer and others during the Nazi era is one notorious example of such pseudoscience. Biological egalitarianism is the view that no or almost no meaningful genetically based biological differences exist among human groups, with the exception of a few superficial traits such as skin colour. Proponents of this view seem to hope that, by promoting biological sameness, discrimination against groups or individuals will become groundless.

We believe that this position, although well intentioned, is illogical and even dangerous, as it implies that if significant group diversity were established, discrimination might thereby be justified. We reject this position. Equality of opportunity and respect for human dignity should be humankind's common aspirations, notwithstanding human differences no matter how big or small. We also think that biological egalitarianism may not remain viable in light of the growing body of empirical data.

Many people may acknowledge the possibility of genetic diversity at the group level, but see it as a threat to social cohesion. Some scholars have even called for a halt to research into the topic or sensitive aspects of it, because of potential misuse of the information. Others will ask: if information on group diversity can be misused, why not just focus on individual differences and ignore any group variation? We strongly affirm that society must guard vigilantly against any misuse of genetic information, but we also believe that the best defence is to take a positive attitude towards diversity, including that at the group level. We argue for our position from two perspectives: first, that the understanding of group diversity can benefit research and medicine, and second, that human genetic diversity as a whole, including group diversity, greatly enriches our species.

[...]

Box 2. Emerging understanding of human genetic diversity

Genetic diversity is the differences in DNA sequence among members of a species. It is present in all species owing to the interplay of mutation, genetic drift, selection and population structure. When a species is reproductively isolated into multiple groups by geography or other means, the groups differentiate over time in their average genetic make-up.

Anatomically modern humans first appeared in eastern Africa about 200,000 years ago. Some members migrated out of Africa by 50,000 years ago to populate Asia, Australia, Europe and eventually the Americas. During this period, geographic barriers separated humanity into several major groups, largely along continental lines, which greatly reduced gene flow among them. Geographic and cultural barriers also existed within major groups, although to lesser degrees.

This history of human demography, along with selection, has resulted in complex patterns of genetic diversity. The basic unit of this diversity is polymorphisms — specific sites in the genome that exist in multiple variant forms (or alleles). Many polymorphisms involve just one or a few nucleotides, but some may involve large segments of genetic material. The presence of polymorphisms leads to genetic diversity at the individual level such that no two people's DNA is the same, except identical twins. The alleles of some polymorphisms are also found in significantly different frequencies among geographic groups. An extreme example is the pigmentation gene SLC24A5. An allele of SLC24A5 that contributes to light pigmentation is present in almost all Europeans but is nearly absent in east Asians and Africans.

Given these geographically differentiated polymorphisms, it is possible to group humans on the basis of their genetic make-up. Such grouping largely confirms historical separation of global populations by geography. Indeed, a person's major geographic group identity can be assigned with near certainty on the basis of his or her DNA alone (now an accepted practice in forensics). There is growing evidence that some of the geographically differentiated polymorphisms are functional, meaning that they can lead to different biological outcomes (just how many is the subject of ongoing research). These polymorphisms can affect traits such as pigmentation, dietary adaptation and pathogen resistance (where evidence is rather convincing), and metabolism, physical development and brain biology (where evidence is more preliminary).

For most biological traits, genetically based differentiation among groups is probably negligible compared with the variation within the group. For other traits, such as pigmentation and lactose intolerance, differences among groups are so substantial that the trait displays an inter-group difference that is non-trivial compared with the variance within groups, and the extreme end of a trait may be significantly over-represented in a group.

Several studies have shown that many genes in the human genome may have undergone recent episodes of positive selection — that is, selection for advantageous biological traits. This is contrary to the position advocated by some scholars that humans effectively stopped evolving 50,000–40,000 years ago. In general, positive selection can increase the prevalence of functional polymorphisms and create geographic differentiation of allele frequencies.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States  05/18/2010
1 Comment(s)

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States
 
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States. The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama admin. can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms. The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened.
 
Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth?

What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens todeliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.
THIS IS NOT A JOKE NOR A FALSE WARNING!    As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control. Read the Article US. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better. View The Full Article Here
 
http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed. This is a very serious matter! Silence will lead to Socialism!!!

There will be an Anti Illegal Immigration rally held on June 26 in Hudson NH, it is being sponsored by NorthEast WhitePride but i have been in touch with Domestic Patriot from their website and he stated that our help would be appreciated. He did state that they are not a religious program but I did inquire about possible recruitment efforts while there and he seemed to be ok with that. Myself and friends will be attending and ill be sure to make our posters reflect the Creativity Alliances stance on this issue and will make sure people are aware that we were there to help. 

WHAT MAKES A PERSUASIVE SPEECH?

Since you have come to this page, you probably realize that persuading people to respond in a particular way is the primary point of any speech.

While this may be obvious for talks such as motivational speeches, fundraisers, or sales presentations, it may be less obvious for project reports, budget presentations or technical reports. Yet, even for these seemingly more objective presentations, the presenter is still seeking acceptance of his or her credibility, skill, or, simply time spent.

We speak to influence our listeners

What techniques help us achieve this objective?

Fortunately, you have a huge range of persuasive approaches. Take a look below.

Structural Techniques:

Formats or Outlines

Set yourself above the ordinary. Choose an outline that which 'sells' your premise or your product. Try telling a story, debate the pros and cons with yourself, do a series of affirmations. Be aware of what your audience will best relate to.

Lead them with logic.

Develop your point step-by-step. Material can be organized in a variety of formats, from the traditional 1., 2., 3., approach to a time line, to a series of causes and effects. What is important is to regularly, and, blatantly, let the audience know where you are, and, where you are going.

Credibility Elements:

Authorities

Quoting recognized authorities in your topic area verifies that you have both done your homework, and, also, know what you are talking about.

Document your factual information and references.

Never leave an audience member questioning where you got your facts...which means he or she is questioning the fact itself.

Experience

When you speak, you need to be regarded as an authority. Your experience is one of the primary things that give you standing in the eyes of your listeners. Make certain it is listed in the introduction bio, but, also, subtly, repeat it in the presentation through such phrases as, "in my 15 year's of working in this field", or, " each of the dozen times we have run this project". Statements like these add more blocks to your foundation of credibility.

Mandate

For presentation listeners, this is an unspoken, but, vital part of your credibility. The question in their head is, "Who, after all, are you to be giving this particular presentation?"

You should address this in the opening of your speech. The mandate, itself, can come from a wide range of possibilities: you did the project you are reporting on (or, you oversaw it), you have related experience, you were invited by a respected person in their group, you have researched the topic at the boss' request, you are the chief poobah and don't have to explain yourself. Whatever it is, spell it out at the beginning. It could be as simple as, 'at the last meeting, you asked me to check out ....."

Specificity

Which has more impact for you:
"The world is going to end.", or,
"The earth will be hit by an asteroid next July."?

Are you likely to give money to "poor children overseas", or, to "four year old Emmia, who digs in the garbage seeking for food". Listeners need concrete items to relate to. When someone tells you to 'paint a picture' for them, that is what they mean.

Openings and Closings:

Openings

Tell them why they should listen.. Why you for this audience at this time on this subject.

Closings

Close: don't just quit.
Work the group to a conclusion and then ask them for some response, eg. "Now you know the problem, can we count on you to help with the project?"

Words, Phrases and Sentences:

The basic rule of thumb for this very extensive topic is to keep your language concrete, descriptive and clear. Sticking to the active voice (yeh, it's that grammar thing!) is also significant. Essentially, what all that means is that you should say, " we found a problem" rather than "it was brought to our attention that there was a problem".

Inclusiveness

Refer to our team, working with them, all of us, together, , etc.

Win with words.

Surveys show that people respond well to particular words such as "improved", "natural", "pure", "tested' and "recommended". Any word which expresses credibility ranks high with consumers and with audiences. Be sure to edit your material to include several.

Sentences that convince rather than confuse

Mood Swings:

Match every facet of your presentation to the mood. A presenter's credibility is suspect when he or she talks about a tragic situation while grinning broadly. The audience is also totally confused when we speak of undertaking a project with enthusiasm and vigor while we are drooping across the stage.

Choreography:

Another broad topic. To get your audience members to react to your text, you will need a variety of dynamics, some physical, some psychological. Move around, raise and lower your voice, use pace and pause, involve the audience, use hand gestures, use props.

The number of tools and techniques and tools for persuasive speeches is boundless. In this article, we have only been able to give you the very basics. To learn more check out speechgems.com.

Hello Brothers and Sisters, Im Brother David Stearns. I was very active in the church years ago and am back. I will be looking for a ministers exam and will be taking up the fight against our enemies like i have done in the past. Our race has suffered long enough under the control of the jew and being victims to the mud races is no longer an option and never was. I will be taking actions to awake our great race and claim our birthright on this planet. No use preaching to the choir in here....someone send me an exam or if i have to pay for it i will, my ex gave my last one to her jew lawyer during the seperation.