Topics

[The Fear of Being Called a Racist Leads to Children Being Raped]

The Fear of Being Called a Racist Leads to Children Being Raped

Related: The Fear of Being Called a Racist Leads to Children Being Raped
https://creativityalliance.com/forum/index.php/topic,8042.0.html

It's a slogan taken straight from a BBC online headline, but has been denounced on the  Left: by Searchlight, on the Right: by Britain First and Centre, and finally by your average anti-White British moron as racist fear-mongering against the creed of multi-culturalism. Britain is a nation that cares more about screaming "THAT'S RACIST!" at its Patriots, Protectors and Saviours than Saving White Children from what used to be called A Fate Worse Than Death.

An article on the BBC News website dated 30 August 2014 has the title 'The Fear of Being Seen as Racist'�.

Referring to events in Rotherham, in which it was exposed that around 1,400 of the town's White girls had been abused, raped and passed around for torture and sexual pleasure by Asian men, the article states: "fear of being viewed as racist has been cited as one of the reasons why child sexual exploitation in Rotherham was allowed to proliferate for 16 years."

"A fear to confront the subject of race ultimately stopped the council engaging with the wider Rotherham community about the problem, the report suggested."�

According to sources such as the Oxford English Dictionary it was the Jewish Communist Leon Trotsky [born Lev Davidovich Bronshtein] who coined the word 'racism',� although this is not entirely corroborated. Certainly the word has been used in an ideological sense by Trotsky and the exact details are not relevant. What is beyond doubt is that the word is employed routinely in the present culture as a weapon with which to silence and accuse. Indeed the word 'racism'� is aimed as a derogatory insult applied uniquely to White people.

What is meant by the epithet 'racist'� cannot be pinned down as it is used whenever it suits to score a hit against White people or White interests. Amongst most Whites the view is that taking a violent hatred against another person for the sole reason that they differ to yourself racially is unjust and cruel. This is the most common definition given for 'racism' when asked. In practice, however the term 'racist' is widely aimed at someone who has not demonstrated any hate of other races but who has simply acknowledged the existence of racial differences. That is all it takes!

The real reason the epithet 'racist'� was created was to attack and hurt the White race, specifically, and to help in the genocide of our race. Feelings of shame and fear of prosecution, social ostracism, loss of career, etc if accused of being 'racist'� scare people into silence and this is the fear that the BBC headline on Rotherham refers to.

Blackmailing in this way has created the climate in which millions decide it is prudent to comply with the gagging and not to rock the boat, staying silent and carefully avoiding being recorded as being 'racist'�.

In the light of the 1400 White girls raped and pimped systematically by Asians in Rotherham, this fear of being called 'racist'� effectively means that those who comply by staying silent are complicit in the crime of child rape.

If instead the observers had put moral duty before cowardly cringing over a pathetic word and gangster-like threats by authorities, those girls could never have been abused en mass as they were.

The abuse of countless other White girls by such Asian men continues in other towns around Britain as well as other crimes committed by non-whites who are unchallenged due to the selfish paralysis or confusion over just what one can object to these people doing if they are members of an immigrant community.

It is a moral duty to speak out against crimes targeting our children – including drug dealing. The paedophilia in this case was a racially defined crime. It is no less objectionable when the culprits are White individuals abusing children – but in those cases the fear of being labeled as racist does not come into play and people will generally do something about it and tell the authorities. If the criminal is not one of the protected establishment elite they are quickly put on trial. The matter of the paedophilia in the establishment is tied in with the immigrant paedophilia as abusers from the very anti-racist Great and Good are supplied with victims from the same care homes that many of the Asian men procured their victims from. This article does not aim to explore that aspect in any detail.

The non-Whites involved in these crimes have a racial contempt for White people. Other races routinely discriminate on the basis of race and commit horrendous crimes particularly against our own White kindred.

Simply for a White person to favour our own race by being RACIALLY LOYAL we are denigrated as being haters and 'racist'�. This even though we may hope and try to be civil to people of other races in the expectation that the other individual will be similarly considerate to us. It is all as nonsensical as if someone was accused of being familyist'� because they love their own close relatives somewhat more than they love total strangers. Imagine such a crime being written into law with the assumption being that if you are loyal to your family, your wife/husband, children or your parents you must surely hate those who are not in your family – such as your neighbours or absolutely anyone not that close to you. Yet that is how we have been taught to view racial loyalty, but only in the case of White racial loyalty. Somehow even though so many fellow Whites regard the idea of White racial loyalty as a bad thing, these people applaud or admire when another race or religious group pull together to work as a collective. Other races are congratulated for working to advance their group interests at the expense of the Whites who are portrayed as historical oppressors.

None of this is justifiable when one tries to take an objective view of things. It is not normal for humans to think objectively however. Human nature is to be biased as well as manipulated. In fact, our genetic interest should also mean we Whites are loyal to our race, just as other races are to their own. Nature intended this in the same way that we show preference to close kin. Science records 'kin selection'� as an instinct vital to mammal psychology and a source of self-sacrifice, kindness, generosity and love as well as a healthy sense of identity. All human beings need a sense of identity and our modern extremist taboo against the racial aspect of identity causes mental illness. It leads to a sense of loss of purpose, depression and failure – leaving White people at a disadvantage compared to the other races who are encouraged to embrace a racial identity even when they are of mixed race.

White people going through their lives as rootless individuals unable to embrace their racial identity and forbidden to discriminate, while indoctrinated to feel guilt for any antipathy towards immigrants are seen by the outsiders as clear victim material. They are targeted like disorientated prey by predators. The girls of Rotherham – lambs to the slaughter clearly dangled as temptation to the Asian predators.

The girls had been indoctrinated to view these immigrants as friendly, attractive and glamorous. They are taught in the perverted sex education at school to experiment sexually at an early age and copy the media that pushes over-sexualised imagery of how young women should dress and conduct their relationships. Adults did not warn the girls about this danger. They left it to the system to direct the girls straight into trouble. Even as the girls became embroiled in the abuse the adults turned a blind eye allowing atrocities to happen – out of sight, out of mind. Just so that they would remain respectable non-discriminating participants of multiracial society. Their conformity means they are culpable for the horrendous experiences of the young victims.
When news broke of the industrial scale of the pimping by Asian men of these poor White girls, the public was duly shocked. Questions were asked as to how this was allowed to happen. For the first time in our hysterically anti-racist, anti-White society even mainstream media outlets spoke out about the need to acknowledge the part race plays in this tragedy. People have to change their perspective and stand up to be counted as proud to be 'racist'� if that really is a prerequisite to demand justice, the guilty charged and their vile practice stamped out.

It is time to shake off the stigma of the accusation of 'racist'� and see such an accusation instead as if it were a badge of honour. To be a 'racist'� is to be someone who cares, who stands up against oppression and bullying and who will not look the other way when the welfare of children is concerned. Our children must be raised to value themselves, to have a racial identity and pride that prevents them admiring other groups who have this quality they lack and acting like love struck poultry around hungry foxes. They must learn to discriminate and keep to their own.

Fear of being seen as racist has been exposed as a scourge in our society. Far from being 'institutionally racist'� as the Ferguson Report stated, the Rotherham scandal has shown the police and social services are institutionally ANTI-racist, with devastating results. Fear of being called 'racist' leads to children getting raped.

See also http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-fear-of-being-seen-as-racist

Have a look at this. http://www.howtomarryafinnishgirl.com/

A Jew explains how to marry a Finnish girl with a cover showing a White woman and brown hands all over her.

Lots of atheists, more Muslims, fewer Christians and Jews: this is the new America

You think Protestantism is holding its ground? Take another look at the map. Many counties in the Bible Belt and Midwest are uniformly Protestant – 70 or 80 per cent – if only in name. That makes them red. But this article from an evangelical Christian website reports widespread scepticism among researchers about the much-quoted figure that 40 per cent of Protestants are weekly churchgoers. That's what they tell pollsters. Try other systems of measurement – an old but effective trick involves counting cars outside congregations – and you're looking at 20 per cent. Much like the Catholics, in fact.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100250598/lots-of-atheists-more-muslims-fewer-christians-and-jews-this-is-the-new-america/

Not sure how believable this is.

http://today.yougov.com/news/2013/09/17/poll-results-exorcism/
Do you personally believe in the existence of the Devil or not?
Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57%
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28%
Don't know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .15%


Do you believe someone can be possessed by the devil or some other evil spirit?
Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51%
No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28%
Don't know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%


How often do you think people are possessed by the devil?
Very Frequently . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6%
Frequently . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9%
Occasionally . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29%
Rarely . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45%
Never . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11%

Some churches have a ceremony called 'exorcism', which is designed to drive the Devil or evil spirits out of a person. Do you believe in the power of exorcism or not?
Yes, I believe in the power of exorcism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46%
No, I don't believe in the power of exorcism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  . . . . . . . . . . .19%
Don't know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36%

 In the UK there are over 8 million pet dogs and barely that number of children aged 10 or under.
In the UK the Islamic newcomers shun dog ownership, as do non-White immigrants generally, and so are responsible for a drop in per capita dog ownership but increase in numbers of children.
When you know nothing more about a person than that they are a White European aged 25 you can take a bet they more likely have dogs than children.
Dogs are expensive, cramp your lifestyle and so on in the ways that typically the "child free" race traitor women – who will also often own cats and treat them as their babies – tell you makes them avoid childbearing.
The toxocara worms from dogs and cats cause human birth defects and blindness in children.  Dogs are often a danger to children and parents who take their children out for a walk inevitably have daily encounters with dog defecation and dogs bounding up barking or putting their mouths and paws on the children.
A man or a woman with a dog severely reduces their chances of meeting up with a potential mate who wants to start a family OF HUMANS.  But I think my Chinese flat-mate was onto something when she said she thinks women "sleep with" their dogs in more ways than one in a lot of cases. Of course her people would rather put them into their meals.
Some will object, saying that many families include a dog.  True but that does not negate my points. They have on average fewer children and set those kids up to repeat the degenerate pattern of behaviour.  It is a good indicator that the family is dysfunctional in some way and the mentality that an alien species is one of your family is an attitude that carries on into lack of racial awareness.
It is truly sick when pets are regarded as baby substitutes.  Often they are included as if they were people on greetings cards for example or they actually sleep in the same bed as the owner.
http://creativityreligionresourcecentre.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/confused.jpg

TO SUM up recent research predicting a mixed-race future for humanity, biologist Stephen Stearns of Yale University turns to an already intermingled nation. In a few centuries, he says, we will all "look like Brazilians". Brazil shares with the United States a population built from European immigrants, their African slaves and the remnants of the Amerindian population they displaced. But with many more free blacks during the era of slavery, no "Jim Crow" laws or segregation after it ended in 1888 and no taboo on interracial romance, colour in Brazil became not a binary variable but a spectrum.

Even so, it still codes for health, wealth and status. Light-skinned women strut São Paulo's upmarket shopping malls in designer clothes; dark-skinned maids in uniform walk behind with the bags and babies. Black and mixed-race Brazilians earn three-fifths as much as white ones. They are twice as likely to be illiterate or in prison, and less than half as likely to go to university. They die six years younger—and the cause of death is more than twice as likely to be murder.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/americasview/2013/04/affirmative-action-brazil?fsrc=nlw|newe|4-29-2013|5623405|37095416|

AntiRacist Hitler

I expect we have all seen this brilliant piece of propaganda by now.

The video allows us to startle and wake up the misguided Whites who will suffer extreme cognitive dissonance as their programming on racism, Jews and Adolf Hitler is challenged.

ULTRA-LIBERAL Iceland wants to ban online pornography. It is just the latest step in its attempts to eliminate the sex industry entirely. In 2009 it introduced fines and jail terms for those who patronise prostitutes (whom it treats as victims). In 2010 it outlawed strip clubs. In February the government decided to take on the glut of smut online and floated the idea of banning violent or degrading pornography, which some Icelanders take to mean most of it. No country has yet wholly succeeded in controlling commercial sex, either through legalisation or criminalisation. But all over the world, particularly in rich democracies, policymakers are watching to see whether Iceland succeeds—and may follow in its footsteps if it does.

http://www.economist.com/news/international/21576366-iceland-determined-outlaw-worlds-oldest-business-can-it-succeed-naked-ambition

This is a very racially superior view on the Jewish profession.  Far from banning the sex industry being "ultra liberal", it is in fact the opposite.  It is socialist and it is authoritarian.  It is heartening to see the Icelandic people maintaining an Aryan instinct on this matter.

There was a terrorist outrage yesterday.  In the west everyone heard about the Boston Bombing in which three died and a hundred or so were injured.  Meanwhile it's the same thing happening routinely in Iraq.  Iraq, where our army was sent to make the country safe for "democracy" and which was previously stable under Saddam Hussein.

One could quite imagine that the Iraqi people do not appreciate the death and destruction they suffer thanks to the US and their allies.  There would be little sympathy from that beleaguered people when the US gets a taste of its own brutality.


http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/15/us-iraq-violence-idUSBRE93E07320130415

A Jewish refugee girl came to stay with Margaret Thatcher - and it shaped her view of Germany I got to know Margaret Thatcher through one of her mistakes. In 1989, as the Berlin Wall fell, and we all looked forward to  a unified Germany, she misguidedly stepped forward (secretly encouraged by President Gorbachev) and said she was opposed. If the country united and became a great Central European state, what was to stop it becoming authoritarian and trying to take over everyone else, just as it had before? It was an old-fashioned view born out of her instinctive distrust of the Germans. Thatcher, remember, was a child of the Second World War.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2308790/A-Jewish-refugee-girl-came-stay-Margaret-Thatcher--shaped-view-Germany.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

Thatcher showed her brain-polluted idiocy.  She was a puppet of the Jews.  Having recently died, Britain is divided with strong opposing views within families on whether she is highly admirable or highly deplorable.  Of course the "right wing" view is that she was great, and helped stamp all over "socialism".  Who was it that once said there is no one more enslaved than those who willingly put chains on themselves? 

The masses are following a pied piper to their destruction and they won't follow a kin-leader until he becomes the leader.  It's a catch 22.

[Jewish crime lord behind £35million cocaine haul sues prison chiefs for 'denying him kosher food']

Jewish crime lord behind £35million cocaine haul sues prison chiefs for 'denying him kosher food'

A drugs baron jailed for trying to smuggle £35million worth of cocaine into Britain is suing his prison for not giving him kosher food.

Orthodox Jew Simon Price, 68, is accusing the prison service of 'institutionalised anti-Semitism' and alleges that both Muslim and vegetarian criminals get more favourable treatment behind bars.

The career criminal is serving 28 years after being found guilty of smuggling 700kg of cocaine hidden inside drums of syrup.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2309241/Drugs-baron-jailed-smuggling-35million-cocaine-sues-prison-giving-kosher-food.html
I was very surprised to see such a bold headline in the Kosher Daily Mail!  How did that story slip through?!  Normally they want to make readers believe Jews are angels and that Muslims are demons.

As yet I see no comments.  Assuming the story is not "pulled" I wonder if their readers will weigh in and accuse the Daily Mail of antisemism for their tone.

Twelve years after the fall of the Taliban, Afghanistan is heading for a near-record opium crop as instability pushes up the amount of land planted with illegal but lucrative poppies, according to a bleak UN report.
The rapid growth of poppy farming as western troops head home reflects particularly badly on Britain, which was designated "lead nation" for counter-narcotics work over a decade ago.
"Poppy cultivation is not only expected to expand in areas where it already existed in 2012 ... but also in new areas or areas where poppy cultivation was stopped," the Afghanistan Opium Winter Risk Assessment found.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/apr/15/afghanistan-expectations-record-opium-crop

Basically the intention was to create this big crop of Opium which international Jewry will profit from financially and in terms of the destructive impact heroin has on society.  The Taliban had traditionally destroyed the poppy crops, but that was before the west declared war on them and now our troops help protect and increase these crops.  It would be no surprise though if some of the Taliban would now have been so angered that they would rather like to gain control of the opium and try and use the drug trade to damage the west in retaliation.  So I am not saying the Taliban would go back to destroying the crop should they be left in a position to do so in the future.

Here is an old article that is also relevant to this: http://www.rawa.org/temp/runews/2008/11/24/cia-heroin-still-rule-day-in-afghanistan.html
"CIA assets again controlled the heroin trade"

First some background for any non-Creators who may be reading this post:

On February 20th, 2013, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois announced that former American National Socialist Workers Party (ANSWP) Commander Bill White was sentenced to an additional 42 months in prison for soliciting violence to the foreman of a federal jury in Chicago that convicted another white racialist, Matthew Hale, in 2004. White stood trial in Chicago in January 2011 and was convicted by a jury of one count of solicitation after prosecutors successfully convinced them that White had used his now-defunct Overthrow.com website to solicit violence against the jury foreman, Mark Hoffman, who White had exposed as a gay Jew in a relationship with a black male. Media stories published by WDBJ Channel 7 in Roanoke and the Roanoke Times.

http://whitereference.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/former-neo-nazi-bill-white-sentenced-to.html

Bill White is able to communicate to his chosen contacts via prison email and he has suggested the following to be published:

From April 2nd




"Hello all:

Please publish the following, if you publish:

I just received news from my mother that the Supreme Court refused to hear my Writ of Certioari.  I am surprised and somewhat shocked by this.  As much as I have criticized America and its institutions, I guess there had still been, somewhere in my heart, some hope that the things I had to say were not true, and that, in the end, truth and justice and all of those things would conquer all.  I was wrong, and I am really still absorbing this.  One of the terrible things about this world is that when you are raised well, among people who are good and who treat each other properly and who respect things like others' rights, the fact that you live in a world that does not do this can be hard to make sink in, even when all of the evidence you encounter is to the contrary.

There are really two things I can say about this.  On the one hand, there is no question that much of my behavior and many of the things I said which gave "context" to this case were immature and foolish and way over the top.  Now, I don't believe I would make statements of that type.  In fact, at the time I made the supposed "solicitation", I would not have made statements of that type, either.  When I made these statements about Mr Hoffmann, I actually considered my words carefully and believed strongly that I was within the constraints of the law.  Clearly, I was wrong.

I can say, in all honesty, that I never intended that Mr Hoffmann be harmed, and it never occurred to me that Mr Hoffmann would be harmed as a result of my words.  In fact, Mr Hoffmann wasn't.  I did believe someone would contact Mr Hoffmann -- as people had told me they contacted Leonard Pitts (and I was not aware of the actualy threats Pitts received at the time) -- and perhaps discuss with him his role in the Hale case.  I thought someone might prank him.  It never occurred to me that anyone would harm him or cause him any sort of injury.

This "intent" was really the only issue in the case, and, as I am the only person who knew my intent, I can say that I was completely innocent of these charges.

My mistake was all of the rhetoric and atmosphere I created around these words that allowed them to be interpreted "violently".  I can't say all of this is my fault.  We live in a society which, as Savitri Devi notes, is not less violent but merely less honest about violence.  People here are trained to believe that so-called "extremists" are "violent" -- when there is very little violence linked to actual "extremists" -- whereas what they and their society do in actually murdering millions around the world is "non-violent."  There were, I believe, some people who understood what I was doing when I was behaving outrageously -- that I was mocking the stereotype of the so-called "extremist" by, essentially, play-acting in a way the media stereotyped and, thus, exposing the essentially fraudulent nature of the entire thing -- but, clearly, in doing so, I left myself open to being portrayed by the government and the Jews as the very thing that I was, in fact, not.

What hurts me so much with this case is that, after the first few efforts by the federal government to frame me and after the first civil action against me -- which I won -- I stopped, at least, I had thought, the kinds of things that were so upsetting, and had taken on a new approach -- one that pushed limits less and was less open to misinterpretation.  When this post happened, I was married, I had just had my daughter eight months before, I has just recovered my business, and I was certainly not, in any way, attempting to do anything which would cause me to be arrested.  Had I thought that I was in any way, shape or form pushing that line, I would not have done what I did.

Clearly, I made a terrible mistake.

It also hurts me that this decision justifies, in a way, all of the violence and abuse I have suffered at the hands of the government.  I understand this fellow Hoffmann was quite frightened -- for a day or to -- and some resources were sent in, quite unnecessarily, to "protect" him.  Was I the real cause of this?  When people who have a history of violence publish my address on the internet and threaten me, no one is deployed to my home to protect me.  I had no history of violence, neither did any organization I worked with -- so, why was Mr Hoffmann so afraid?  In my view, he was made afraid by the FBI and the police, who created an unnecessary and irrational level of fear.

On the other hand, maybe I was wrong.  Maybe I was unaware of who was in my audience.  But, the fact that no violence occurred at all makes me think that I don't think so.

So, what does one make of this?  Well, either America and its governing bodies are correct, in a moral sense, or they are not.  Factually, I know they are not.  Morally?

Well, the Jews sent to analyze me from time to time would call this a "personality disorder" -- an "anti-social" one at that -- but I don't believe that the United States, its government, and its system of law have any moral legitimacy.  The Supreme Court would rather consider whether homosexuals have a "right to marry" -- an utterly ridiculous proposition that can only be understood as a manifestation of mental illness at a societal level -- then whether political dissidents have a right to criticize legal institutions that are unquestionably corrupt an behaving in an utterly bizarre and immoral manner. 

I consider this.  Everywhere in the world, a murder is a crime.  A theft is a crime.  A rape is a crime.  There is no question that these are breaches of the societal agreements that human beings have with each other.  But, where in the world would my statements be a crime?  My acts were only a crime in that they challenged a specific legal and political system, and could only be seen as a crime by proponents of that legal and political system -- and those proponents are hardly worldwide.  True, most countries do not let political dissidents criticize their system of law -- but, the ability to criticize the legal system and its acts was supposed to be a cornerstone of American "democracy."

Anyways, I am sorry I did something so foolish that I brought all of these problems down on me.  I was certainly immature, years ago, when these acts occurred, and I, and those around me, are paying for my foolishness and inability now.

So, I am very sorry to all of you.  I think this case says more about what America is right now than me, but it also says that, in my late 20s, when I should have been taking a much more serious approach to the world, I made the mistake of enjoying tweaking my nose at the system a bit too much -- and made the foolish mistake of thinking myself much more able to challenge the world than I really was.  I should have realized precisely how powerful and evil the men and women I was facing were, and conducted myself accordingly.  The problem is that I was never brought up to be afraid of evil men and women in power, and that is a lesson I should have learned young.

Thank all of you for your support, and, hopefully, for your continuing support.

Bill"
---
The next email:

"Hello all:

I arrived this morning in Oklahoma City.  My unit team must have done their job, since the flag on me that was causing me to be SHUed here is gone -- as far as I can tell.  Alternately, the BOP made yet another mistake.  What do I know about it?

The journey here was terrible -- the worst I've ever had it, including the time the plane broke down and stranded me in Milan.  I told Dave Gahary on his podcast Sunday about the way that the BOP abuses people, but I really didn't touch on the casual abuse that is part and parcel of housing in the BUreau of Prisons.  For instance, yesterday, I was summonsed to prepare to leave Chicago about 8:30 AM.  In transit, they shackle us in very uncomfortable handcuffs, chains, and ankle-cuffs.  We were left sitting shackled until the bus left, sometime after noon.  We sat on the bus at the airfield until perhaps 1 PM.  We sat on the plane, through a flight into South Dakota, until, perhaps, 6:45 PM, when we arrived in Oklahoma.  Because Oklahoma was understaffed and unprepared for us -- perhaps as a result of the sequester -- we sat until 9:30 PM on the plane before we entered the building.  Once there, we were unshackled, but sat in various bullpens until about 5:30 AM this morning when they finally sent us somewhere we could lay down and go to bed.  About 80 people were affected.

This kind of casual abuse of human beings -- hurting people because you just don't care about their welfare -- is the norm within the Bureau of Prisons.  And, being crowded into a relatively small room with eighty people all night without sleep or the possibility of sleep is abusive.  The fact that some of the people are truly turds and might deserve some abuse notwithstanding -- there is no particular reason for this kind of treatment except a mixture of incompetence and lack of feeling.

This is the same incompetence that causes the Air Marshals to mock inmates on the plane -- I heard plenty of that yesterday.  One fellow was in a wheelchair -- no legs -- that was his fault for inconveniencing them.  Another fellow could barely walk to the toilet and, being very old, had sat so long waiting for a bathroom he had to be cathetered to go.  There is simply no concern and, really, contempt when people like this are handled.  In my own, humble, case, some idiot confiscated half of my glasses.  They are broken and I have them repaired with a staple.  This fine Negro gentleman determined that the staple was a "wire" and thought it might be used for nefarious purposes -- so he confiscated it and the piece of glasses it was securing while I was on the plane.  (I did get it back and did repair it).

This kinds of petty things are what makes custody in the Bureau of Prisons difficult to tolerate.  And, if you complain, you deserve it because you did something to result in being in prison.  These people have no idea what and, when they have an idea, have no idea of the truth of the matter, but they are assured of that.

My thoughts for the morning.  I'm here today.  I expect I shall be here unti Monday, since it does appear they are shipping me, erroneously, to Loretto.

16 emails this morning.  I shall respond as soon as possible.  Other than my complaining, I am doing well.

If anyone wants to post this, they can.

Bill"   That one is from 2nd April also

Going to the moon was a triumph of the White race and heavily used technology advanced during the 3rd Reich.  Since WW2 things have been sliding, for obvious reasons, but can we be surprised that this has led to a denial of the level we once reached and how nearly we humans could have moved into greater extra-terrestrial adventures.  If the Germans had won the war, we would have a world so advanced that it would seem like a science fiction to us if we could see it now.

I don't know how to post the link on this forum but look for: "moon hoax not".

But outraged Dublin victim Andrew Madden last night insisted that child abuse was not considered normal in the company he kept.
Mr Madden accused the Pope of not knowing that child pornography was the viewing of images of children being sexually abused, and should be named as such.
He said: "That is not normal. I don't know what company the Pope has been keeping for the past 50 years."

Read more: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/popersquos-child-porn-normal-claim-sparks-outrage-among-victims-15035449.html#ixzz2FcdRmhM4

You can't reason a person out of a position that they didn't reason themselves into.

I have just watched an excellent 4 part expose of Christinsanity which I recommend watching if you are a calm person

See on youtube: "Is the Bible Still Relevant Today - Richard Dawkins Debates".

As a new forum member - a Creator - I hope to find the time to join in with the community on here.   I am a married mother of eight.  I have been racially aware since the age of 20 and spend a lot of time in internet activity and spreading the ideas of Creativity. 

I think of myself as a philosopher and find that so much philosophy lacks an application of science and logic which is the best guide.  Creativity encompasses this common sense and objective knowledge of the world very well.  It is so essential that our race has a ready-made road map in Creativity to allow them to make correct decisions in life.

I hope you will also excuse me if I prefer to discuss ideas and topics rather than my personal life as I prefer it that way!