Stop the Asian Invasion: Chinese Takeover of Australia - Politicians 4 Sale

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

Adam Giles , the former Chief minister of NT.Yes.....the pro Chink clown of boong extraction who sold Darwin's port to China is being eyed as a One Nation Candidate.

Pauline Hanson once knew Australia was to be swamped by Asians now this disfunctional half-wit is being considered!?
One Nation has become a joke! Liberal party has become a joke with recent changes. Things don't look bright politically for Australia right now!

https://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/news-item/darwin-is-asias-gateway-to-australia-interview-with-adam-giles-chief-minister-northern-territory/

As the closest region to Asia, the 'Top End' remains a prized strategic location to Australia, which has enabled the Northern Territory to progressively integrate its economy with the region. Earlier this year, Serge DeSilva-Ranasinghe interviewed Adam Giles, the Territory's Chief Minister, who also occupies the strategic Portfolio of Asian Trade and Engagement. The conversation focused on his Government's initiatives to bolster linkages with Asia, the Territory's geographic identity, the challenges inherent in attracting foreign investment, opportunities presented by the US forces being positioned in Darwin, and his Government's future plans to engage Asia.

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/amp.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/pauline-hanson-courts-adam-giles-to-top-one-nations-victorian-senate-ticket/news-story/6b0fe9a1a5704e92a379ccb58ef82faf

[Rev.Cambeul]

Things don't look bright politically for Australia right now!

Things haven't looked bright politically for Australia since the 60's when they removed former Spitfire pilot, Sir John Gorton, as Prime Minister.

Having actually fought (and been wounded and permanently disfigured) in a war - unlike just about every Australian politician since Federation - Gorton was considered too independent and a threat to the status quo. It was Gorton that got Australia the F111's - because they were nuclear capable. It was Gorton that set up the nuclear power station in Sydney - because we could make nukes from the leftovers. It was Gorton that did not want a single Australian soldier put at risk when just pressing a button would do the job. It was Gorton that they sacked - because politicians like having soldiers die for them and all the national mourning and sadness that goes along with it and helps to boost their ratings.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

I'd say best Prime Sinister since Gorton would have been Howard.

If you look at what was done he was a decent one.
Still Alfred Deakin would be arguably the best from a nationalist perspective.

[Rev.Cambeul]

I'd say best Prime Sinister since Gorton would have been Howard.

From Whitlam through Fraser and Hawk, the numbers remained the same. Howard is responsible for bringing in the first multitudes of refos. Krudd/Gillard, Abbott and Turnbull increased the number.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

I'd say best Prime Sinister since Gorton would have been Howard.

From Whitlam through Fraser and Hawk, the numbers remained the same. Howard is responsible for bringing in the first multitudes of refos. Krudd/Gillard, Abbott and Turnbull increased the number.

At least Howard tried stopping the boats . He had budgets running with a surplus.
Abbot ,well his budgets were brutal because Labour ruined us and we had to get back on track.
He's the only PM that wanted to stop this Abo free for all.
But... being a big industry that so many businesses in Rural Australia rely on the people at the top shut him down. It would have ruined the economies of so many towns.

Cory Bernadi makes sense!
More sense than Pauline Hanson nowadays.
He is against the Greens with a passion as well as radical Islam!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZjHktitZd8

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

China activates 'ship killer' DF-26 missiles after 'sink two carriers' threat

Beijing has moved to make good on its threat to 'sink two aircraft carriers', stating it has activated 'ship killer' ballistic missiles.

https://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/military/china-activates-ship-killer-df26-missiles-after-sink-two-carriers-threat/news-story/f79a6f94023709ccb46d49794d0c3c07

https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/world/china-activates-ship-killer-df26-missiles-after-sink-two-carriers-threat/news-story/f79a6f94023709ccb46d49794d0c3c07?utm_source=The%20Advertiser&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=editorial

Beijing has moved to make good on its threat to 'sink two aircraft carriers', stating it has activated 'ship killer' ballistic missiles in response to a US Navy challenge earlier this week.

The state-controlled Global Times news service overnight reported its newest ballistic missile weapon system, introduced as recently as April last year, are being deployed to positions best suited at striking vessels in the East and South China Sea.

The announcement follows a Chinese Vice Admiral's threat stating the best way to force the US to 'back away' from Beijing's attempts to annex the disputed waterways would be to 'sink two aircraft carriers'. He boasted China could do so with the introduction of new ballistic missile systems.

RELATED: Chinese Admiral's chilling recipe to dominate South China Sea

But the announcement of the deployment comes just days after a US warship passed through the Taiwan Strait and close to the Paracel Islands (Xisha Islands) — claimed by China, Vietnam and Taiwan — to assert the international rules of the sea which govern rights of free passage.

"The timing of the report sparked discussions among Chinese military observers online, as it came after the USS McCambell, a US guided-missile destroyer, trespassed into China's territorial waters off the Xisha Islands on Monday without permission from the Chinese government," the government mouthpiece noted.

Military aircraft and warships had been sent to warn the US vessel away, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lu Kang said at a daily briefing earlier this week.

But the later state-controlled media report about the missiles indicates Beijing is beginning to lose its patience
"The DF-26 is China's new generation of intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of targeting medium and large ships at sea," the Global Times warned. "It can carry both conventional and nuclear warheads."

The missiles are ballistic, meaning they boost their warheads high into the edge of space.

These warheads then plunge at very high speeds back down towards their targets.

SPECIAL REPORT: China's exploding military might

Unlike conventional, shorter-range cruise missiles, the DF-26 will not be positioned close to the Taiwan Strait or on the disputed islands themselves.

Instead, Chinese state-run television service CCTV reports the truck-mounted weapons are positioned in a distant outpost: "The DF-26 is attached to a brigade under the People's Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force that operates in Northwest China's plateau and desert areas".
"A mobile missile launch from deep in the country's interior is more difficult to intercept," the Global Times quoted an expert as explaining.

He said the DF-26 has enough range — reputed to be some 4500km — to cover the South China Sea, even when launched from deep within China itself.
"During the initial phase of a ballistic missile launch, the missile is relatively slow and not difficult to detect, making it an easier target for enemy antimissile installations.

"After the missile enters a later stage, its speed is so high that chances for interception are significantly lower."

The state media report went so far as to highlight the significant US naval base in the middle of the Pacific at Guam was within range of the missiles.

"The report is a good reminder that China is capable of safeguarding its territory," it stated.
The US in recent weeks has called on its international allies — including Australia — to ramp up pressure on Beijing's attempt to assert control over the international shipping lanes and fisheries through an increased tempo of 'freedom of navigation operations' (FONOPS) by their warships.

The US insists it is not interested in who owns the islands.

Instead, it says it wants to maintain the freedom of access practised through the busy trade hub since the end of World War II.

Recently, however, Beijing has asserted what it claims to be traditional sovereignty over the entirety of the South and East China Seas. An international arbitration court rejected this claim, but China has chosen to ignore the ruling.

Nor does international law allow territorial rights to be applied to the waters around artificial islands. Beijing has recently completed a chain of fortresses on what had previously been coral reefs and demanded that all nations respect its 12 nautical mile (22km) sovereign territorial claim around them.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu told reporters that China had demanded the USS McCampbell leave waters around the Paracel Islands.

"Relevant actions by US vessels violate Chinese and international laws, infringe on China's sovereignty, and undermine peace, stability and good order in relevant waters," Lu said.

But international legal institutions have rejected this claim.

"We will continue to take necessary measures to safeguard national sovereignty and security," he added, potentially referring to the later announcement of the DF-26 missiles.

The spat comes ahead of Beijing-Washington trade talks this week