New Australian Misinformation Bill: A Crime to Question Black Privilege

[Rev.Cambeul]

The proposed powers would apply to digital platforms accessible in Australia, including search engines, social media sites, dating sites, and web forums.

You can be imprisoned if you:
* Question Black Privilege
* Doubt White Privilege
* Question the Climate Holocaust
* Question historical propaganda
* Or simply express any doubt about the Latest Thing ...

Because expressing your doubts may cause Harm to some politically correct person's Feelings, somewhere. 

They may be talking about Twitter, Facebook, and private blogs and forums just like this forum, but that will quickly be followed up by reports that you were overheard privately expressing doubts about any officially sanctioned facts. You doubt that? It's already part of Holocaust Denial Laws in Germany, and general Hate Crimes in Scotland. In many Asian countries, this is already their standard operating procedure. No dissent is permitted.

THAT'S WHAT THE MISINFORMATION ACT IS ALL ABOUT.

The time for lawful activism is rapidly coming to an end. When you live in an era when peaceful dissent is outlawed, then it becomes the duty of every patriot to take up arms in order to put an end the current regime. We Creators have a word for that; that word is RAHOWA!

23 Words.
@Cailen.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_503cVTuGWw

Web Search: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Australian+Misinformation+Bill

Be aware that the man behind this legislation is Federal Attorney General (((Mark Dreyfus)))

Misinformation and disinformation spread via digital platform services is a major issue worldwide. The rapid spread of false, misleading and deceptive information online has resulted in a multitude of harms from disrupted public health responses to foreign interference in elections and the undermining of democratic institutions. The ACMA recommended the government provide it with a graduated set of new powers to combat misinformation and disinformation across the sector. These powers would increase transparency and ensure that digital platform services are held to account if voluntary industry efforts prove to be inadequate.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-06-25/fines-to-punish-online-misinformation-under-new-draft-bill/102521500

https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/communications-legislation-amendment-combatting-misinformation-and-disinformation-bill2023-june2023.pdf

harm means any of the following:
(a) hatred against a group in Australian society [except of course for those racist evil White people] on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, gender, sexual orientation, age, religion or physical or mental disability;
(b) disruption of public order or society in Australia;
(c) harm to the integrity of Australian democratic processes or of Commonwealth, State, Territory or local government institutions;
(d) harm to the health of [politically correct] Australians;
(e) harm to the Australian environment;
(f) economic or financial harm to Australians, the Australian economy or a sector of the Australian economy.

news source means any of the following, if it produces, and publishes online, news content:
(a) a newspaper masthead;
(b) a magazine;
(c) a television program or channel;
(d) a radio program or channel;
(e) a website or part of a website;
(f) a program of audio or video content designed to be distributed over the internet.

(2) For the purposes of this Schedule, dissemination of content using a digital service is disinformation on the digital service if:
(a) the content contains information that is false, misleading or deceptive; and
(b) the content is not excluded content for misinformation purposes; and
(c) the content is provided on the digital service to one or more end-users in Australia; and
(d) the provision of the content on the digital service is reasonably likely to cause or contribute to serious harm; and
(e) the person disseminating, or causing the dissemination of, the content intends that the content deceive another person.

(3) For the purposes of this Schedule, in determining whether the provision of content on a digital service is reasonably likely to cause or contribute to serious harm, have regard to the following matters:
(a) the circumstances in which the content is disseminated;
(b) the subject matter of the false, misleading or deceptive information in the content;
(c) the potential reach and speed of the dissemination;
(d) the severity of the potential impacts of the dissemination;
(e) the author of the information;
(f) the purpose of the dissemination;
(g) whether the information has been attributed to a source and, if so, the authority of the source and whether the attribution is correct;
(h) other related false, misleading or deceptive information disseminated;
(i) any other relevant matter

[Br.FrankSmith]

Indeed - defeat and eliminate this scum, replacing them with our own.

[Rev.Cambeul]

How everyday Aussies could be slapped with massive fines under Anthony Albanese's 'disturbing' new misinformation laws: 'Threat to our democracy'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12261481/Australian-misinformation-law-Albanese-governments-proposed-laws.html

Excerpt: The Albanese government's new laws to prevent the spread of 'misinformation' could see individuals hauled before a watchdog empowered to issue millions in fines.

While the laws are targeted at social media giants such as Facebook and Twitter, it is unclear if the proposed legislation would allow the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) to also fine the individual creators of podcasts or website.

Under the draft legislation ACMA will be able to fine 'digital platform service providers' millions of dollars for spreading what they deem is 'mis'- or 'disinformation' that is also considered 'harmful'.

A 'digital platform provider' is defined as 'a person who provides a digital platform service', which includes websites.

Misinformation is defined in the draft bill as 'false, misleading or deceptive' content that is likely to cause serious harm, while disinformation is defined as misinformation that is disseminated with deceptive intent.

The new laws would apply 'to a broad range' of such platforms including search engines, news aggregators, social media and podcast services.

Under the draft legislation ACMA could fine transgressors against the 'code of practice' it will establish by up to $2.75million or two per cent of global turnover.

If a transgressor breaches an 'industry standard', also set by the watchdog, the watchdog can impose a fine of up to $6.8million or five per cent of global turnover.

The government says the intent is to incentivise digital platform providers to have robust systems and measures in place to address misinformation and disinformation.

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqgFCBN9lUU

[Br.IanVonTurpie]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KdToa-tgT2s