Messages

[@Cailen.]

There's no problem with doing that. Deal honourably and humanely with anyone who responds in a likewise manner. To those that don't respond in an honourable and humane manner, deal with them as ruthlessly as required while retaining your own honour and moral values. Whether it's humane or not depends on the circumstances.

As for Jewdaism vs Islam, many think along the lines of "the enemy of my enemy is my brother." I believe this is wrong, as neither jews nor Muslims follow this line of thinking. History shows us that when they do follow the ideal of "the enemy of my enemy is my brother," it's usually because they have something to gain over their ally as well as the chance completely obliterate their enemy in methods that peace loving White moralists of today turn a blind eye to, but frown upon if we, White people, so much as suggest the use of those same methods.

Jewdaism and Islam can not be reasoned with. I see them as two sides of a coin. Treat that coin as if it is outlawed foreign currency. Exchange it for legal tender and allow the machinery of the banks to ship it back to its country of origin at a profit to you and I.

@Cailen.

[Drop the List!A practical guide detailing how and why membership organizations are inappropriate in the new millennium.]

From: http://www.solargeneral.com/dropthelist.htm

Drop the List!
A practical guide detailing how and why membership organizations are inappropriate in the new millennium.

"If you accept people of low quality into your ranks, be prepared to have them testify against you."


There are three pressing reasons why membership organizations can and should convert to associate organizations, how they can do so in a quick, efficient manner and how general, daily functions and a chain of command can be continued uninterrupted. Think of this as a hybrid theory, halfway between leaderless resistance and a membership organization, with the benefits and advantages of both. We shall examine the reasons to get away from the membership approach permanently.

   1. A membership list creates a legal culpability between the leadership and the members; background checks or no, if one member commits a crime, however minor or unpolitical, that holds the entire organization liable for a civil or criminal judgment. And crimes which are not political in nature "become" political via prosecutorial fiat. Without a membership list, associates are merely individuals with a few politically incorrect books on their shelves and no formal connection with any organization that may easily be dredged up in court, plus the drawing of clear connections between a nebulous associate organization and an individual who is not engaged in a pattern of corrupt activity becomes much more difficult. Signing your name on any dotted line is as good as sending all of your personal information to the Feds, along with your political beliefs, because that is where it will end up eventually.

   2. A membership list creates an easy avenue into the organization where governmental spies, federal informants, moles, media hacks, snoops, anti's, low-quality individuals, and the mentally unstable are allowed a very easy avenue of access to the core structure of power. The lack of the membership list and it's resultant ranking or elevation by mere status alone (as opposed to organic evolution of responsibility and proof of personal quality by good deeds) means that rejects will still be attracted to the teachings of any such organization, but such defectives will be self-limiting in their effects and otherwise kept away from any core power structure when they finally blow up.

   3. A membership list is the proverbial brass ring which the government loves to get its hands on, it is the sole purpose for moles and infiltrations, and ZOG will go to great lengths to do so, both quasi-legal and blatantly illegal. This is usually easy pickings because most membership orgs are sadly lacking when it comes to common sense internal security and safety practices. Examples: a NA membership coordinator let a traitor he was screwing get access to the entire membership files of 100+ NA members in several states, and the complete information of all these people is now listed publicly on an pro-communist webpage. The FBI went to the garbage dump to collect the old membership list that Dr. William Pierce threw away, but didn't shred or otherwise destroy; the feds got what they wanted due to a lack of simple precautions on the part of the NA. Bryon Calvert had his house searched by the JTTF (run by an ADL jew) over a "possible trademark infringement;" after the feds carted away his computer and files for analysis to sift through until they got what they were looking for, Calvert was given a stern dressing down for his beliefs... and then let go. How many other SWAT-style raids are executed on such flimsy grounds without a resultant arrest? To answer for you: None, which is precisely why it was quite plainly politically motivated, and thus it is all the more reason not to have your name end up on any list whatsoever.

The feds will dig to the deepest depths and invest unlimited resources to get that membership list. Getting the membership list is not an opinion or option, it is instead merely a matter of time, patience, and cost, which ZOG has in spades. Thanks to the initiatives of cross-linking databases for the purposes of "combating terrorism" and similar Big Brother spying schemes being pushed all over the Western world (think: Total Information Awareness) that list will forever go into every database for the police, ATF, DHS, FBI, CIA, NSA, InterPol, etc. This governmental dossier assembled on you can and will be tied in with your entire credit history, what school you went to, your criminal record, your marital status, your employer, the names of your spouse and children, etc. Your phone will be tapped, and you may even be followed around. Receipts of every purchase you make, every picture ID ever taken of you will go into that database, your IP address and web surfing habits will be recorded when the government goes to your ISP. Every email you send, every instant message you send, every web site you visit will be recorded down to the second.

Is this what you want? How effective at bringing about change will you be when this happens? How effective can you expect to be if the enemy knows your next move before you do? This is how it is now in the new Amerika and if you don't understand this now, if you don't get it, you will only comprehend when it is too late. There are no martyrs in this age, and no one will care save a few of your comrades around the world if a few "nazis" get erased from the system.

To the leaders of such membership orgs, I ask you: How secure are your membership files? Are they kept in an encrypted state 100% of the time on your hard drive using military-grade encryption tools and software (like PGP, GPG, DriveCrypt, etc.)? Do you always conduct your e-mail communications with regional membership coordinators securely, using publicly-available e-mail encryption programs, taking into account the fact that Carnivore and Echelon can snoop your e-mail and other electronic communications without your knowledge or consent? Are you using secure, encrypted IM systems for coordinating activities and general political chatting (like SST, Gaim, HushMessenger, Trillian, etc.)? When portions of such lists must be transmitted through cyberspace, do you encrypt those messages with PGP so they can only be read by the recipient alone? Is the hard-copy of the list kept in the safety deposit box of an unconnected non-relative in the next town? What general precautions do you have in place to protect such member lists if your office or residence is raided?

If you have answered "No" to any of the above questions, then you have fundamentally failed in your responsibility and duty to protect the privacy and rights of those who support you and you have jeopardized their livelihoods by your negligence and ignorance. Your failure to act or even consider these possibilities means that those brave souls who believe in your message may end up losing their jobs, houses, cars, families, worldly possessions and everything else they hold dear because of your short-sightedness when (not if) the list eventually makes its way into governmental hands. Remember, the enemies of our people also control the government, and they have effectively convinced most of your unaware countrymen that they have little reason to fret or worry if a few "nazi's" such as yourself "get what's coming to them," one way or another, legally or illegally, civil rights or no. The paperwork you throw around so lightly without a whim or care in the world would really just make their day.

And don't bother letting the excuse of "We aren't doing anything illegal; we're 100% above board" enter into your mind. That may very well be true from your perspective alone, but (a) that line holds no water with our enemies in the jew occupied government, the jewsmedia, or the mainstream anti-culture, and furthermore (b) with 60,000,000 laws, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, and case rulings on the books, chances are if someone follows you around long enough, you'll break some law unintentionally, and then it's trial time for you while the entire org is effectively shut down and shut up. Most importantly, (c) you are not the one who determines if your actions are legal or illegal; that is left up to ZOG and the enemies that run it. Do you think they will be fair to you irrespective of your politics and beliefs simply because you have a handful of ephemeral "rights" on your side? Matt Hale, Chester Doles, Christine Greenwood and many others were 100% legal in their activism; how much did a membership list help them prove it?

Quite the contrary, the membership list just made ZOG's job easier when they finally decided to crack down. That's why it has to go and go for good.

Why take these chances? The idea of being a card-carrying member is an old-school 1950's idea whose time has long past, and it needs to go the way of the dinosaur. Why keep drudging it up again, as if that angle of attack hasn't been tried before? Preaching a revolutionary creed demands a revolutionary approach to implementing it, and an application form is anything but revolutionary. The entire structure and style of a membership org is absolutely unsuitable for proposing or bringing about wholesale, top-to-bottom changes to our government, business and culture in what amounts to a revolutionary fashion. They are too easy to infiltrate; too easy to misdirect once infiltrated; too easy to snoop on, gather dirt, and pick apart once a mole in inside; usually too dependent on the leader to subsist once the government has taken him down; and the members are usually too dependent on the leadership structure to adjust and fend for themselves once the leader is gone.

This does not mean member organizations do not have any function to play in the days to come, nor does it mean we can easily resist the depredations our people suffer without any organization at all; it just means that they are giant sitting ducks for ZOG to take shots at. The possible exception to this rule would be a front organization/company which helps that particular cause through funneling money into movement-related efforts, but even that requires layers of bureaucratic paperwork and LLC's in order to shield the relationship, plus insurance against judgments, plus a dedicated and competent legal counsel on retainer.

If your current organization cannot afford the above trappings, then do everybody a big favor until the big funding appears: shred your paperwork, wipe your hard drives and start thinking like a real under-cover revolutionary dropped behind enemy lines. You have nothing to lose and a lot more security to gain by making just one slight, painless change to how operations are conducted.

 

So, now the list is gone once and for all, how will things get done in the fashion of what we shall call Associate Resistance? To answer, let's talk about what you can still do as an associate org and what you may do additionally once freed from the fetters of bureaucratic paperwork.

   * An associate organization will still have a chain of command; it will just be based on practicality and personal effectiveness vs. membership status alone. Those associates who perform well and have been proven to get things done effectively will be called upon to do more as is necessary, as opposed to your begging those who got to their elevated position by status of ideology alone, but are ineffective politically, dragging their feet when even moderate action is required. Associate orgs organically demand quality; membership orgs soak up quantity.

   * You will still be able to collect money from associates; this will be referred to as "gifts," "donations," and "tithes" now and you politely request they be sent in regularly. This may realistically reduce the amount of money you collect for operations, but it will grant you a degree of security you did not have beforehand once you set up the apparatus to collect anonymous donations (blank money orders, e-gold transactions, stamps, well-concealed cash, etc.).

   * You can still have a headquarters, leaders, the appointments of leaders, the delegation of duties and responsibilities, regular board meetings, etc., just like with the membership structure. When done circumspectly, e.g., like at various different hotels, it becomes very difficult to trace effectively.

   * An associate structure grants additional anonymity to your members on a two-way street. They don't need to know much about you, you don't need to know much about them and hence their ability to betray you is minimized provided you don't open up more than is necessary to spread the word.

   * An associate org reduces the burden of quality control on your part. You no longer need interview and check out the life and background of every single person that supports you. If someone is unstable mentally or commits some major crime, it does not reflect poorly on you and these are not sitting ducks for ZOG to force into testimony against you.

   * An associate structure means that more people may support your cause from a distance, people who otherwise would balk at having to fill out 2-page forms and applications just to send you money. There is a natural sense of privacy involved in this arrangement, something that is lacking with membership orgs because they insist on paperwork even for the minor role of supporter; no one considers that maybe some folks don't feel comfortable filling out what resembles a job application to merely send you cash on a regular basis.

   * Associate org's can take and will get more quality over quantity than a mere membership org. The losers who need the psychological benefit of belonging to something will go elsewhere, the spies and moles will have a harder time getting in to do damage and snoop around, and those who want to do good, honest work for their cause will elevate themselves through their honest dedication and performance as opposed to mere status alone. Additionally, this prevents or at least reduces the chances of mental rejects getting into positions of power and then blowing up, taking everything you've built and worked for down with you.

   * An associate structure means that those who would position themselves as your subordinates must consistently prove themselves to be good, reliable people over a period of time. With a membership org, lower-level folks are forced to work with people they don't know due to status alone, and introductions to that person or examinations of their trustworthiness are of secondary importance, if included at all; In an associate org, people must come to trust each other first before they can effectively work with each other.

In short, nothing major really changes once you move away from a membership-based structure. You gain more benefits and much more security in associate mode than you can ever effectively hope for or enforce with a member org, and you can still get things done just as efficiently.

 
Rules and general ideas for Associate Resistance:

Rule #1: Buy and use a paper shredder, preferably a cross-cut model. They're cheap, starting only about $20 and practical to use for all your communications, papers, files and receipts. Don't keep anything in your records which may even remotely be used against you, and start by disposing with the member/supporter lists. Burn the shreddings if you have to. If in doubt, shred it out.

Rule #2: Learn how to use and make frequent use of encryption software, like PGP, HushMail, SST and others. Attempt to use such software for the majority of your communications. These programs keep private what needs to be kept private. Remember: you have a personal right not to testify against yourself, but your papers, belongings, books, e-mails, and affects have no rights. The most effective movements minimize the personal liability of their members by reducing or eliminating what can be easily snooped on or seized for use as ad hominem attacks.

Rule #3: Keep your eyes peeled for anyone who advocates blatantly or even marginally illegal acts, especially gun-related issues. Be wary of changes in personality in your members. No matter how long they've been with you, be on the lookout for someone who suggests that you can "kickstart the revolution" by taking the law into your own hands, since this is just what ZOG wants. Better to not get involved in any kind of conspiracy than end up on the receiving end of a federal indictment.

Rule #4: Avoid meddling with guns. More people are in jail for having firearms than using them; with 26,000 laws on the book rights now, it's best to avoid firearms for the time being, so don't do anything stupid to end up with them if you shouldn't have them. Avoid confrontations where physical force, even in self defense, might be necessary. Use common tools or strategically placed household items for self-defense. Learn enough martial arts to protect yourself against personal attacks.

Rule #5: Don't hesitate to perform "Quality Control" within the ranks. You will be known as a "meanie" but it will save your ass in the long run. Make frequent use of lie-detectors, bug sweepers, and background checks on your people, both new and veteran. Remember: Quality over quantity, and you maintain quality by regularly weeding your garden.

Rule #6: Keep your head down. An associate org is at its most revolutionary when you have a good spokesman out on the front lines but keep the majority of supporters out of the limelight except for certain support functions. The entire movement lasts much longer in the gathering storm if it's invisible to the naked eye, and if its members are unknown and cannot be easily traced.

Rule #7: Spread the word. Your job is to take your message and creed to those who may be receptive, so don't lose sight of this. The grand game is won by having mass believers on your side, not by having a swelling rank of members. The marketing and sale of your reading materials espousing your creed are of primary importance, as it is the lifeblood of your movement and mission. Give this a first priority and you shall never be short of adherents. Pick up a book on marketing and/or sales tactics to help you out.

So the remaining question is: When are you going to start thinking like a revolutionary? Acting like a revolutionary? How many people have to get arrested on trumped up charges for you to get it? No more membership organizations at all, period. Drop out now; its time to start taking this seriously and getting revolutionary.

Remember: We are on the upswing right now, the pendulum is starting to swing back in our favor, and the old illusions of "freedom" and "liberty" are rapidly evaporating before the eyes of the working class Whites, along with their paychecks and standard-of-living, all under the uncaring gaze of a government which has forsaken them for the jew World Order. How quickly and completely we succeed in the future depends entirely on how we play our cards right now. Make the wise choice; your race and bloodlines demand nothing less.

Good luck.

[@Cailen.]

                                                                   

"The Crazy Men of Destiny"

      ... Mingled with abnormal men at the outset, however, are the genuine misfits, losers, and inferiors, the freakish, the defective, and the malformed gravitate to the depths and edges to accompany the exceptional men though for different causes. Clinging to the strong men of destiny and intruding themselves into periodic revolutions in the futile hope of alleviating their miseries, the constitutionally subnormal are wiped out quickly (as on the frontier) by the extraordinary pressures and circumstances: ...

And there we have a different description of the same thing.

Legitimate Activist = The Crazy Men of Destiny
Criminal-Political Gangs = Genuine misfits, losers, inferiors, freakish, defective and malformed

Something I noticed a long time ago is that those who are part of the WP gang culture can leave it at any time they choose and be accepted by mainstream society/the system. It doesn't matter what amount of thuggery and buggery they have perpetrated, the moment they publicly atone for their "racist" thought patterns and blame their own lack of self control on said "racist" thought patterns/anti-internationalist ideals/the movement/Creativity/someone else, they are not only welcomed by mainstream society, they are placed on a pedestal and applauded by those who control the JOG propaganda apparatus. This is such common place behaviour that most of us can list at least three cases such as this within the last five years.

Altogether, that is quite a lot. Little wonder why within the WP gang scene you will find the same individuals leading the same gangs year in, year out. While their rank and file membership fluctuates almost daily.

Another problem is that those who are part of the WP gangs are working with blinders on. They consider themselves to be loyal "soldiers" following the orders of their "leader" because only their gang can solve all the woes of the world. What happens is these loyal followers become so insulated within the infrastructure of their little group, they lose focus on the reasons why they originally joined that group in the first place. They become embroiled in fighting any perceived rivals and more concerned with attaining their own power within their little group than the racial activism they foresaw prior to joining the gang. Then when something goes wrong for them - usually they are arrested, or they are stabbed in the back by a trusted brother - they turn against every ideal that they previously claimed they stood for. If it wasn't for the deliberate narrow sightedness enforced on the gang rank and file by its leadership, many of those members would not turn against their ideals when something went wrong and would most probably have already gravitated to a legitimate form of activism rather than continue with the thuggery and buggery. But then again, many of them are also the genuine misfits, losers,  inferiors, freakish, defective and malformed that find solace together and make up the WP gang scene.

As for the genuine activists/the crazy men of destiny, they usually recognise a situation that is wrong, extricate themselves from that situation without going against their ideals or morals, admit they chose the wrong methods or tactics and then continue on another tack while following the same course they originally set out to pursue before the situation turned to mud. (Both Reverend Doctor Billy and myself did exactly that in an effort to remain faithful to Nature's Eternal Religion: CREATIVITY.)

For this reason the genuine activist/the crazy men of destiny are continually shunned by society. They are the men that have the gumption to admit when they are wrong and then carry on, but refuse to accede to the demands of polite society/the system and say "sorry" in an attempt to curry favour with a misbegotten society that they now and will eternally despise.

@Cailen.

["Racist" Criminal-Political Gangs Are No Friends Of Ours November 28 2005Dr. Jim Saleam]

Found the following and thought others would like to read it.

I don't agree with everything that Dr Saleam says or does (although I get along with him well), but in this matter, he is 100% correct. As for the specifics he mentions, I can't vouch everything, but it is not the specifics we care about in this, it's the circumstances surrounding them. Cause and event remain the same.

How does it relate to us? If you think of Creativity as a microcosm of all White Racialist/Nationalist political struggles, then you should be able to draw the right conclusions from the article and act accordingly to remove the "Criminal-Political Gang" element from Creativity.

http://home.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/kangarooreich/partthirtyseven.html

"Racist" Criminal-Political Gangs Are No Friends Of Ours

November 28 2005
Dr. Jim Saleam

As soon as a creative man makes his resolve and proceds with his work, somewhere else in a dark envious soul, there rises a crooked determination to stop him, to smash the work. Francis Parker Yockey, Imperium, p. 260.

There is a stratum of people called 'under-men', 'lumpen', 'untermensch', 'canaille', 'scum'. They are harsh words for a group of human beings who exist in every country and amongst every people, nationality and race.

On occasions, this type has cropped up in the history of the Australian nationalist movement, not as part of it, but as a group to the side and which comes into conflict with us.

As our country stresses under the pressures of immigration and economic rationalism, these people appear in increasing numbers. They will in numbers appear across the political and other spectrums of society. My task here is to tell you how they impact on us.

I am going to tell you several brief stories as a warning. As readers know, I have written about the Palmer group of neo-nazis, but this is a very different (and rather) sociological and psychological sort of phenomenon. On some occasions, I will omit names etc. If what you read makes you wary and angry at 'nothings' who invade your political territory, stay angry and always vigilant.

White Power (White Powder) (Adelaide)

White Power (called 'White Powder' by Adelaide nationalists) was formed in Elizabeth in late 1995 and ran through til late 1996, when its leader went to jail for several years on drugs charges. The leader had noted that white youths in Elizabeth had tensions with Vietnamese and he set up a 'defence club'. He rented a 'club house'. Anyone could join White Power by donating a third of his dole cheque - in beer for the leader's consumption. He would organise robberies etc. with all getting a share. The girlfriend was Chinese.

White Power observed the activities of the former 'National Action' and considered the group as political (sic) competition. Not only that, the stated policy on executing drug traffickers looked like a personal threat (!!!), so White Power targetted National Action. Cars were smashed and the chairman of the group was stalked. On one occasion, he was stalked to an otherwise empty, isolated house, by several White Powder members. They attempted forced entry into the solid stone premises. One report (unverified) said the nationalist leader was armed with a rifle and a couple of rounds, but a timely intervention by other National Action members may have prevented an incredible incident: literally a fight for survival. It was also reported independent nationalists were obliged to 'raid' White Powder's club house to persuade them to leave patriots alone.

The politics of White Power was simply 'racist'. It produced no publications. The membership was young and obviously - naive. The leader was a criminal. The group had a limited lifespan, but fine qualities for troublemaking.

Australian National Socialist Movement (ANSM) (Brisbane)

The ANSM was formed in Brisbane in 1994 and faded out in 1996. The leader was Gary Robson, a physically fit man who controlled a group containing a few Skinheads and some other youth. In the end, he rejected Skinheads as "big mouths", "pisspots" and "anarchists". The group specialised in booze parties until it became clear this got in he way of military training (bush walks and target practise). Members daubed a synagogue, but were caught. People attending a 'revisionist' historical meeting were intimidated and a local nationalist group was threatened because they wouldn't accept control by ANSM. The group issued public bulletins that threatened violence to persons who left the group. Some evidence exists that members regularly committed petty crimes from car stealing to break and enter. Robson considered himself the 'leader' of a new "pro-White" movement and if groups wouldn't yield to him peacefully, he'd do it by force. He issued assorted smears of groups that would not accept his control. In the end, he tired of it all - and went overseas. This 'leader' was just a man on a mission who, on Brisbane's south side, assembled a volatile group of 16 - 21 year olds around himself. Some people influenced by Robson passed on into other equally hopeless grouplets, like Aryan Knights. A linked group of Satanists faded out around the same time.

Aryan Guard (Melbourne)

This group existed around a criminal Melbourne family in the years 1994-96, with no more than a dozen persons involved. It used a 'Nazi' style. Most of the members went to jail at different points and for long terms. One of the prisoners was notorious as a homosexual rapist! The Aryan Guard adopted a pseudo Skinhead image, although they were not popular within that milieu. The group engaged in various bashings of migrants (which impacted upon political groups like Australians Against Further Immigration) and assorted robberies and fund-raising crimes.Two members, Darren Patching and Damien Gadsden were imprisoned in December 1996 for the bashing of a Maori. The main problem (sic) with Aryan Guard was a high rate of alcohol consumption in the ranks, something which gauranteed trouble. The disappearance of Aryan Guard was no loss.

The Middap group (Melbourne)

Greg Middap was a drug criminal pure and simple. He had spent a long period in prison over a manslaughter matter and was named by the sentencing judge concerning an elaborate drug smuggling opeation. In late 1994, he intended to broaden his drug distribution operation beween South Australia and Victoria. He even used a 'half-way house' in Melbourne as a cover. In that year, he approached Michael Brander of National Action, offering legal and other services. The relationship ended in early 1996, but not before Middap tried to take over the group, occasioning what rumours assert was a violent reaction on the part of the National Action. Middap continued to target certain persons in Melbourne and a "Turkish" member of his group claimed members of the Middap group firebombed the car of a nationalist.

The odour of drugs was introduced into the public reputation of the broader patriotic community courtesy of Middap. What was his purpose? Middap obviously was looking for a cover to move drugs and to protect his shipments and distribution. If he could corrupt members of a political group, he had the perfect stooges.

The 'men in black' security group (Melbourne)

The 'men in black' emerged in late 1997 / early 1998 around two Melbourne identities, Dean Clarke and Ross Diggins. Clarke and Diggins are understood to have meandered about the patriotic scene before surfacing as regular contacts of the National Action group in late 1997 / early 1998. They then began to recruit for a 'security service' which they said would help out Pauline Hanson. Dressed in smart black gear, about 15 males were recruited. In the years, 1997 - 2001, possibly 20 persons passed through the group. After falling out with the National Action, they targetted ex Australians Against Further Immigration leader, Robyn Spencer, then of One Nation. They infiltrated the League of Rights and did violence to a nationalist they falsely accused by being "homosexual". The group collected intelligence on the named organizations and was disruptive at every turn. The possibility exists it was a gang with an intelligence component, given family connections with police. However, there were reports of drugs.

Clarke and Diggins are still around Melbourne causing residual trouble for the League Of Rights. One of their closest friends turned up in 2003 as a loyal supporter of a Trotskyite front, a man also personally known to Robyn Spencer and who had infiltrated various patrotic groups.

The 'men in black' was an attempt to muscle in on existant groups under the guise of offering protection. In that way too, target groups could be penetrated. It seems there was an element of the ego-driven search for 'power' in the group and further judgement is reserved.

The White Devils (Perth)

This group was formed in Perth by Daniel Klavins in 2004. It has now achieved real notoriety because of the part it played in the imprisonment without bail of Jack van Tongeren. We know that White Devils had a 'club house' behind a suburban home where alcohol was staple fare. The White Devils was formed inside the new ANM group launched by van Tongeren after his release from prison in 2002. Possibly there were a dozen recruits.

The group was - of course - 'tougher' than van Tongeren. These hard men would get on with the job and do the violence which their leader was (after his earlier experiences) reticent about. Drugs were involved and members of the group had histories both as pushers and consumers. Before too long, the White Devils were doing racist violence and had come under notice. Once apprehended, the hard-men rolled over on van Tongeren, making false allegations against him. The need for a new racism terror trial to support the new repressive legislative regime in Western Australia was there and the state had no problem in turning these lumpen against van Tongeren..

Klavins was a nobody who thought he was engaged in a race war. He had no strategy. He would simply do property damage. There was no psychological impediment to his later recruiitment as a state liar against van Tongeren. In his world, things were 'personal' and he would do whatever his disposition told him; his struggle was a personal protest, hence his survival from prosecution would also be a personal thing.

The Snowtown Murderers (Adelaide)

The most notorious group of serial killers in Australia's criminal history also had a political (sic) dimension. In late 1994, two of them found their way to the shop operated in the centre of Adelaide by National Action. One of the two (Joe Wagner) had a close association with the group, living what was in effect - a double life. From what was in his shattered mind a political base and through his other political contacts and with other points of inspiration, Wagner and his friends could incite the murder-group to kill people considered homosexual or in some manner defective and profit in various ways from their deaths.

The Snowtown killers represented the dark side of South Australia. They could never have emerged had not the economic downturn not ravaged South Australia, producing an alienated group of marginal people; nor would Wagner's path gone the way it did if he had not associated in his mind National Action with gang activity and anti-social crime.

Some former members of National Action say that the Snowtowners arrests and prosecution had a severe impact upon their group, causing some people to withdraw and in whatever way it can be understood, encouraging leader Michael Brander to abandon Australian nationalism for a less contentious, Catholic, off-beat brand of patriotism, articulated chiefly by reference to a certain European tradition. Others say the endless confrontation between National Action and the undermen, the lumpen, of Adelaide, also demoralised the their group generally, causing its fight to survive to also fatally mirror gang organization. Possibly so. It is all too understandable.

Conclusions: Or Brigadier General Kitson's Theory Of 'Counter-Gang'

Making conclusions of these short narrative tales is difficult without a framework. The groups have real similarities and some differences too.

Consider the general rules: Leaders of mediocre ability. Drug and alcohol abuse. Marginal people of limited intelligence. Sociopathy and some pathological traits in the members and leaders. Confused politics, scarcely articulated even in the few written publications. Fascination with pseudo-military or paramilitary activity. Egoistic demands that political organizations concede them some function. Stupid, unplanned, violence which laid members open to arrest. Confrontations with nationalist and patriotic groups, including violence and threats of violence. Some interaction with the Skinhead and biker milieus, but generally alienated from them. Criminal histories for assault, stealing, robbery and related offences. Club houses from whence the violent or criminal forays would be organised. Bad relations with similar formations, obviously reflecting turf wars.

These groups are therefore hardly political formations, despite any rhetoric used. They are essentially criminal structures. Now, these groups were just too bizarre and volatile to have been state organized vehicles to disrupt nationalist and patriotic politics, but this is what they did. Was that ever taken into account?

I mentioned Brigadier General Kitson. Kitson was in the 1950's and 1960's the British Army's number one expert on guerrilla warfare. He argued that to counter an insurgency the state could either develop its own counter-gang formations, or in other cases promote indirectly groups that could perform the counter-gang function. As the reader suspects, he used the term 'gang' in a certain way. He meant a radical group outside of the normal discourse of politics and challenging the state usually with violence. I believe the idea can be applied even wider.

A counter-gang would mirror the insurgent group, copy its style and slogans. It would perform actions in accordance with the insurgency to win some support. It would denounce the real insurgents as either corrupt, or imposters, or extremists, or agents etc, turning the truth upside down. Ultimately, it would target the insurgents, setting up a bloody side-show war to drain away the resources of the insurgents. They would approach genuine people, telling them there was something 'wrong' in the insurgents not dealing with them as brothers in arms.

Is the point obvious? Okay, we are not in this military situation, but in a civil-political environment. But, but, but ..... Have you not heard these sorts of counter-gang remarks from obvious nutters or unsavoury people and have you suspected 'something' just isn't right? Now we know. These 'politically-styled' counter-gangs are a reality of of life whether the Australian state organises them or not. But as always, the state intelligence organs listen and are ready to allow the lumpen an opportunity to wreck havoc upon the Australian nationalists.

The criminal psychological type has no place inside the ranks of Australian nationalism. Genuine people need to cover each other to keep these bandits out of our broad movement. How we do that will be discussed elsewhere.

Inside The Kangaroo Reich

http://australiafirstparty.net

Another ex WCOTC here. Joined about 2000.

Welcome to the forum.

R!