Messages

[@Cailen.]

Being in Australia I use http://www.vistaprint.com.au but the company has sites all over the world in a number of languages. Just click the link, sign up and get them to start sending you daily offers in your email. Don't buy anything unless it is on sale and you will soon have your own professional business cards and stationary.

@Cailen.

[@Cailen.]

If Von Stauffenberg had spared even a single Jew from being sent to a KZ camp and risking death from cholera or dysentry, then Spielberg would have made the movie himself; Von Stauffenberg would have been honoured as a Goy hero of the Chosen People; And Hollywood would have made millions making movie after movie about traitors within the Third Reich, but no. They want to keep the kiddies believing that old Grandpa was an evil purveyor of the Nazi death cult, stacking Jews into pyres and incinerating them.

So kiddies, watch the movie (if you can tolerate Cruise). Discover that there were ordinary people and even traitors within the Third Reich that had absolutely nothing to do with Jews, and you might drop your unwarranted guilt about Grandpa.

@Cailen.

[Cruise's Valkyrie blasted as "Nazi apologia"]

Cruise's Valkyrie blasted as "Nazi apologia"

An influential US critic on Friday blasted Tom Cruise's latest movie Valkyrie as ``Nazi apologia'' in the sharpest criticism yet of the WWII thriller.

The movie features the US superstar as Colonel Claus von Stauffenberg, an aristocratic German who headed a group of top officers who hatched a plot to kill Hitler late in the war.

Roger Friedman, film critic for Fox News, said the movie appeared to intentionally minimise the impact of Nazism.

"I'm concerned that Valkyrie could represent a new trend in filmmaking: Nazi apologia. Not once in Valkyrie do any of the 'heroes' mention what's happening around them. Hitler has systemically killed millions,'' said Friedman.

"Valkyrie opens the door to a dangerous new thought: that the Holocaust and all the other atrocities could be of secondary importance to the cause of German patriotism.''

Friedman criticised the set designers for minimising or hiding the swastikas that have become symbols of the evils of Nazism, and blasted the portrayal of Hitler as a ``doddering fool with a British accent and a nice suit''.

Friedman's political criticism of the movie may have been the sharpest of US reviews, but it was far from the only negative assessment.

Writing in the Washington Post, Phillip Kennicott blasted the film's puzzling failure to portray von Stauffenberg's life before his unsuccessful assassination attempt - when he was untroubled by Nazism and served as Hitler's loyal soldier.

Kennicott also criticised the movie for failing to point out that the plot was hatched not out of moral objections to Nazism but only when Germany was facing imminent collapse.

Stauffenberg ``was not a committed anti-Nazi until very late in the game'', wrote Kennicott. ``Many anti-Hitler conspirators weren't so much against Nazism, with its vile racial and militarist policies, as they were against Hitler's disastrous leadership of the war''.

Cruise himself came close to distorting the extent of German support for Hitler and his policies.

``It's important to know that it wasn't everybody - not everybody felt the way (Hitler did) or fell into the Nazi ideology,'' Cruise said during the film's US press tour.

``The thing that stood out to me was Stauffenburg himself and the amount of desperation and pain for him,'' Cruise said. ``He wanted a moral country that participated in the world, not one of annihilation and Holocausts and world domination.

``He was a man who was able to see through all the propaganda and see how utterly insane Hitler was, and ultimately he was the one to say, 'Somebody's got to shoot that bastard.'''

Now I'm confused. Originally I wasn't going to bother watching that movie because it would no doubt be another dose of anti-Nazi propaganda from the Mayer-Goldwyns of Hollyweird, but if watching it offends the Holohoaxers and might possibly promote a future trend towards movies promoting German nationalism while minimizing or even ditching altogether the mythical stories we've heard far too much about, then I think I should go see it.

Now to deal with the fact that I can't stand Tom Cruise and still don't want to see the film. I'd rather watch a good documentary.

@Cailen.

[Picower charity folds due to Bernard Madoff trading scandal losses]

Picower charity folds due to Bernard Madoff trading scandal losses

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24830230-5005962,00.html

THE Picower Foundation, a charity that supports programs ranging from medical research to education, said it was shutting down because of losses from investments with Bernard Madoff.

The foundation's assets, which were listed at more than $1 billion, were managed by Madoff, the fund manager accused in a $50 billion fraud.

"This act of fraud has had a devastating impact on tens of thousands of lives as well as numerous philanthropic foundations and nonprofit organisations," foundation President Barbara Picower said.

"We deeply regret that in such a harsh economic climate, we will be unable to support the profoundly important programs and organistions that have helped us further the Foundation's mission."

Madoff, who was arrested on December 11, is accused of running a global Ponzi scheme, where earlier investors are paid off with investments of newer clients. The fund manager was put under 24-hour detention in his Manhattan apartment.

The scam has affected businesses and charities around the world.

Tufts University in Medford, Massachusetts, has written off a $20 million investment it made with Madoff Securities, according to a letter from Lawrence Bacow, president of the university.

The investment accounted for less than 2 per cent of the university's endowment, Ms Bacow said.
The Picower Foundation has distributed more than $268 million in grants to organisations around the United States.

Organisations that have received funding include the Picower Institute for Learning and Memory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology as well as Human Rights First.

The foundation also has provided funding for the New York Public Library, the Children's Health Fund and the Palm Beach County School district.

I wonder how many schools and organisations it donated to were majority Jewish or pro ADL format?

@Cailen.

[@Cailen.]

When talking about a particular Jew, Jewish groups, Zionists, Israel or Jews as a whole, then I use the word Jew. When talking about a blend of different things which traditionally people with our political beliefs blamed solely on the Jew, I use Global Elite. Unless it's a specific blame that can be layed at the feet of a Jew or Jews, I won't use it.

The average White person is coming to our way of thinking, but has been trained to respond with instant repulsion when a non-Jew uses the word Jew without due care. I wont go into the Kosher cast's trigger words and their Pavlov's Doggy style reactions, but that is precisely what I'm trying to avoid with my own particular style of writing.

On the other hand, there are times when I really did feel that Jew would be a more appropriate word to use, but given the audiance I was writing for and the specific rule I set for myself in regard to that audiance ... Global Elite remains my chosen substitute.

@Cailen.