Racial Loyalty News

R.L. News => Positive Activism => Enemy Activism & Lawfare => Topic started by: Rev.Cambeul on 13 August 2009 at 12:25

Title: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 13 August 2009 at 12:25
Holocaust denier Fredrick Toben to serve time in jail

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,25924475-29277,00.html?from=public_rss (http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,25924475-29277,00.html?from=public_rss)

By Tim Dornin | August 13, 2009

HOLOCAUST denier realist Fredrick Toben has been taken into custody to serve a three-month jail term over publishing offensive material on the internet.

The 64-year-old was taken from the Federal Court in Adelaide by Australian Federal Police today after losing his appeal against his conviction for contempt of court.

The Full Court of the Federal Court also ruled that his jail term, originally imposed in May this year, was in no way excessive.

"In our opinion, the sentence of three months cannot, on any stretch of the imagination, be considered excessive or unwarranted," the three-judge panel said.

The judges said Toben also had a disregard for the orders of the court and had acted to undermine the authority of the court.

Earlier this year, Toben was found guilty on 24 counts of contempt for ignoring a previous court order preventing him from publishing racist material on the Adelaide Institute website. When he later imposed a three-month sentence, Justice Bruce Lander said Toben had continued to breach those 2002 orders, which prevented him from publishing specific anti-Semitic material.

The 2002 orders stemmed from a racial discrimination case brought against him by Jeremy Jones, a former president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

In his final submissions today, counsel for Toben, David Perkins, suggested the material published on the Adelaide Institute website, which questioned whether the holocaust even occurred, was just a "drop in the bucket" compared to the amount of revisionist material available on the internet.

But in their verdict, the judges said the case before them was not about the holocaust, gas chambers or the execution of Jews during World War II. They said it was about whether or not Toben had complied with orders of the court.

"Obedience to the court is not optional," they said.

As the court rose, Toben asked if he could say something to the judges, only to be cut off by Justice Jeffrey Spender who simply said, "No".

More on this topic: https://sacreator.com/index.php?s=toben&submit.x=0&submit.y=0 (https://sacreator.com/index.php?s=toben&submit.x=0&submit.y=0)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 05 December 2009 at 22:27
I see the answer to this in rather simple terms.

Question 1: What was the maximum number of Jews under German control during WWII?

Question 2: What number is given in the earliest reports of supposed Holocaust survivors?

Equation 1: Subtract Question 2 from Question 1 (Q1-Q2)=?

Equation 2: Subtract six-million (shown as H) from Question 1 (Q1-H)=?

Equation 3: Q1-(Q2+H)= Positive proof that the so-called Holocaust is the greatest lie of the 20th century.

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 05 December 2009 at 23:08
66 Questions and Answers on the Holocaust
(an early IHR (http://ihr.org/) publication)

1. What proof exists that the Nazis killed six million Jews?
None. All we have is postwar testimony, mostly of individual "survivors." This testimony is contradictory, and very few claim to have actually witnessed any "gassing." There are no contemporaneous documents or hard evidence: no mounds of ashes, no crematories capable of disposing of millions of corpses, no "human soap," no lamp shades made of human skin, and no credible demographic statistics.

2. What evidence exists that six million Jews were not killed by the Nazis?
Extensive forensic, demographic, analytical and comparative evidence demonstrates the impossibility of such a figure. The widely repeated "six million" figure is an irresponsible exaggeration.

3. Did Simon Wiesenthal state in writing that "there were no extermination camps on German soil"?
Yes. The famous "Nazi hunter" wrote this in Stars and Stripes, Jan. 24, 1993. He also claimed that "gassings" of Jews took place only in Poland.

4. If Dachau was in Germany, and even Wiesenthal says that it was not an extermination camp, why do many American veterans say it was an extermination camp?
After the Allies captured Dachau, many GIs and others were led through the camp and shown a building alleged to have been a "gas chamber." The mass media widely, but falsely, continues to assert that Dachau was a "gassing" camp.

5. What about Auschwitz? Is there any proof that gas chambers were used to kill people there?
No. Auschwitz, captured by the Soviets, was modified after the war, and a room was reconstructed to look like a large "gas chamber." After America's leading expert on gas chamber construction and design, Fred Leuchter, examined this and other alleged Auschwitz gassing facilities, he stated that it was an "absurdity" to claim that they were, or could have been, used for executions.

6. If Auschwitz wasn't a "death camp," what was its true purpose?
It was an internment center and part of a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic fuel was produced there, and its inmates were used as a workforce.

7. Who set up the first concentration camps?
During the Boer War (1899-1902), the British set up what they called "concentration camps" in South Africa to hold Afrikaner women and children. Approximately 30,000 died in these hell-holes, which were as terrible as German concentration camps of World War II.

8. How did German concentration camps differ from American "relocation" camps in which Japanese-Americans were interned during WWII?
The only significant difference was that the Germans interned persons on the basis of being real or suspected security threats to the German war effort, whereas the Roosevelt administration interned persons on the basis of race alone.

9. Why did the German government intern Jews in camps?
It considered Jews a direct threat to national security. (Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Communist subversion.) However, all suspected security risks -- not just Jews -- were in danger of internment.

10. What hostile measure did world Jewry undertake against Germany as early as 1933?
In March 1933, international Jewish organizations declared an international boycott of German goods.

11. Did the Jews of the world "declare war on Germany"?
Yes. Newspapers around the world reported this. A front-page headline in the London Daily Express (March 24, 1933), for example, announced "Judea Declares War on Germany."

12. Was this before or after the "death camp" stories began?
This was years before the "death camp" stories, which began in 1941-1942.

13. What nation is credited with being the first to practice mass civilian bombing?
Britain -- on May 11, 1940.

14. How many "gas chambers" to kill people were there at Auschwitz?

15. How many Jews were living in the areas that came under German control during the war?
Fewer than six million.

16. If the Jews of Europe were not exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?
After the war millions of Jews were still alive in Europe. Hundreds of thousands (perhaps as many as one and a half million) had died of all causes during the war. Others had emigrated to Palestine, the United States, and other countries. Still more Jews left Europe after the war.

17. How many Jews fled or were evacuated to deep within the Soviet Union?
More than two million fled or were evacuated by the Soviets in 1941-1942. These Jews thus never came under German control.

18. How many Jews emigrated from Europe prior to the war, thus putting them outside of German reach?
Perhaps a million (not including those absorbed by the USSR).

19. If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did the commandant, Rudolf Hoess, confess that it was?
He was tortured by British military police, as one of his interrogators later admitted.

20. Is there any evidence of American, British and Soviet policy to torture German prisoners in order to exact "confessions" for use at the trials at Nuremberg and elsewhere?
Yes. Torture was extensively used to produce fraudulent "evidence" for the infamous Nuremberg trials, and in other postwar "war crimes" trials.

21. How does the Holocaust story benefit Jews today?
It helps protect Jews as a group from criticism. As a kind of secular religion, it provides an emotional bond between Jews and their leaders. It is a powerful tool in Jewish money-raising campaigns, and is used to justify US aid to Israel.

22. How does it benefit the State of Israel?
It justifies the billions of dollars in "reparations" Germany has paid to Israel and many individual "survivors." It is used by the Zionist/Israeli lobby to dictate a pro-Israel American foreign policy in the Middle East, and to force American taxpayer aid to Israel, totaling billions of dollars per year.

23. How is it used by many Christian clergymen?
The Holocaust story is cited to justify the Old Testament notion of Jews as a holy and eternally persecuted "Chosen People."

24. How did it benefit the Communists?
It diverted attention from Soviet war mongering and atrocities before, during and after the Second World War.

25. How does it benefit Britain?
In much the same way it benefitted the Soviet Union.

26. Is there any evidence that Hitler ordered mass extermination of Jews?

27. What kind of gas was used in German wartime concentration camps?
Hydrocyanic gas from "Zyklon B," a commercial pesticide that was widely used throughout Europe.

28. For what purpose was "Zyklon B" manufactured?
It was a pesticide used to fumigate clothing and quarters to kill typhus-bearing lice and other pests.

29. Was this product suitable for mass extermination?
No. If the Nazis had intended to use poison gas to exterminate people, far more efficient products were available. Zyklon is a slow-acting fumigation agent.

30. How long does it take to ventilate an area after fumigation with Zyklon B?
Normally about 20 hours. The whole procedure is very complicated and dangerous. Gas masks must be used, and only trained technicians are employed.

31. Auschwitz commandant Hoess said that his men would enter the "gas chambers" to remove bodies ten minutes after the victims had died. How do you explain this?
It can't be explained because had they done so they would have suffered the same fate as the "gassing" victims.

32. Hoess said in his "confession" that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled bodies out of gas chambers, ten minutes after gassing. Isn't Zyklon B explosive?
Yes. The Hoess confession is obviously false.

33. What was the exact procedure the Nazis allegedly used to exterminate Jews?
The stories range from dropping gas canisters into a crowded room from a hole in the ceiling, to piping gas through shower heads, to "steam chambers," to "electrocution" machinery. Millions are alleged to have been killed in these ways.

34. How could a mass extermination program have been kept secret from those who were scheduled to be killed?
It couldn't have been kept secret. The fact is that there were no mass gassings. The extermination stories originated as wartime atrocity propaganda.

35. If Jews scheduled for execution knew the fate in store for them, why did they go along with the Germans without resisting?
They didn't fight back because they did not believe there was any intention to kill them.

36. About how many Jews died in the concentration camps?
Competent estimates range from about 300,000 to 500,000.

37. How did they die?
Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged war-torn Europe during the war, as well as from starvation and lack of medical attention during the final months of the conflict, when virtually all road and rail transportation had been bombed out by the Allies.

38. What is typhus?
This disease always appears when many people are jammed together under unsanitary conditions. It is carried by lice that infest hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B, more Jews might have survived the camps.

39. What is the difference if six million or 300,000 Jews died during the Second World War?

40. Some Jewish "death camp" survivors say they saw bodies being dumped into pits and burned. How much fuel would have been required for this?
A great deal more than the Germans had access to, as there was a substantial fuel shortage during the war.

41. Can bodies be burned in pits?
No. It is impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen.

42. Holocaust historians claim that the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about ten minutes. How long does it take to incinerate one body, according to professional crematory operators?
About an hour and a half, although the larger bones require further processing afterwards.

43. Why did the German concentration camps have crematory ovens?
To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses of those who had died.

44. Given a 100 percent duty cycle of all the crematories in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire period such crematories were in operation?
About 430,600.

45. Can a crematory oven be operated 100 percent of the time?
No. Fifty percent of the time is a generous estimate (12 hours per day). Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.

46. How much ash is left from a cremated corpse?
After the bone is all ground down, about a shoe box full.

47.If six million people had been incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?
That remains to be "explained." Six million bodies would have produced many tons of ashes, yet there is no evidence of any large ash depositories.

48. Do Allied wartime aerial reconnaissance photos of Auschwitz (taken during the period when the "gas chambers" and crematoria were supposedly in full operation) show evidence of extermination?
No. In fact, these photographs do not even reveal a trace of the enormous amount of smoke that supposedly was constantly over the camp, nor do they show evidence of the "open pits" in which bodies were allegedly burned.

49. What was the main provision of the German "Nuremberg Laws" of 1935?
They forbid marriage and sexual relations between Germans and Jews, similar to laws existing in Israel today.

50. Were there any American precedents for the Nuremberg Laws?
Years before Hitler's Third Reich, most states in the USA had enacted laws prohibiting marriage between persons of different races.

51. What did the International Red Cross have to report with regard to the "Holocaust" question?
An official report on the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944 pointed out that internees were permitted to receive packages, and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified.

52. What was the role of the Vatican during the time six million Jews were allegedly being exterminated?
If there had been an extermination plan, the Vatican would most certainly have been in a position to know about it. But because there was none, the Vatican had no reason to speak out against it, and didn't.

53. What evidence is there that Hitler knew of an on-going Jewish extermination program?

54. Did the Nazis and the Zionists collaborate?
As early as 1933, Hitler's government signed an agreement with the Zionists permitting Jews to emigrate from Germany to Palestine, taking large amounts of capital with them.

55. How did Anne Frank die?
After surviving internment in Auschwitz, she succumbed to typhus in the Bergen-Belsen camp, just a few weeks before the end of the war. The was not gassed.

56. Is the Anne Frank Diary genuine?
No. Evidence compiled by Dr. Robert Faurisson of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax.

57. What about the familiar photographs and film footage taken in the liberated German camps showing piles of emaciated corpses? Are these faked?
Photographs can be faked, but it's far easier merely to add a misleading caption to a photo or commentary to a piece of footage. Piles of emaciated corpses do not mean that these people were "gassed" or deliberately starved to death. Actually, these were tragic victims of raging epidemics or of starvation due to a lack of food in the camps toward the end of the war.

58. Who originated the term "genocide"?
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jew, in a book published in 1944.

59. Are films such as "Schindler's List" or "The Winds of War" documentaries?
No. Such films are fictional dramatizations loosely based on history. Unfortunately, all too many people accept them as accurate historical representations.

60. How many books have been published that refute some aspect of the standard "Holocaust" story?
Dozens. More are in production.

61. What happened when the Institute for Historical Review offered $50,000 to anyone who could prove that Jews were gassed at Auschwitz?
No proof was submitted as a claim on the reward, but the Institute was sued for $17 million by former Auschwitz inmate Mel Mermelstein, who claimed that the reward offer caused him to lose sleep and his business to suffer, and represented "injurious denial of established fact."

62. What about the charge that those who question the Holocaust story are merely anti-Semitic or neo-Nazi?
This is a smear designed to draw attention away from facts and honest arguments. Scholars who refute Holocaust story claims are of all persuasions and ethnic-religious backgrounds (including Jewish). There is no correlation between "Holocaust" refutation and anti-Semitism or neo-Nazism. Increasing numbers of Jewish scholars openly admit the lack of evidence for key Holocaust claims.

63. What has happened to "revisionist" historians who have challenged the Holocaust story?
They have been subjected to smear campaigns, loss of academic positions, loss of pensions, destruction of their property and physical violence.

64. Has the Institute for Historical Review suffered any retaliation for its efforts to uphold the right of freedom of speech and academic freedom?
The IHR had been bombed three times, and was completely destroyed on July 4, 1984, in a criminal arson attack. Numerous death threats by telephone have been received. Media coverage of the IHR has been overwhelmingly hostile.

65. Why is there so little publicity for the revisionist view?
Because for political reasons the Establishment does not want any in-depth discussion about the facts surrounding the Holocaust story.

66. Where can I get more information about the "other side" of the Holocaust story, as well as facts concerning other aspects of World War II historical revisionism?
The Institute for Historical Review, P.O. Box 2739, Newport Beach, CA 92659, carries a wide variety of books, cassette and video tapes on significant historical subjects.

66 Questions & Answers About the Holocaust
Nizkor's response to the Institute for Historical Review & Ernst Zündel:
http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/features/qar (http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/features/qar)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 05 December 2009 at 23:08
The following text was lifted from News-Groups.


Statistics relating to Jewish populations are not everywhere known in
precise detail, approximations for various countries differing widely, and
it is also unknown exactly how many Jews were deported and interned at any
one time between the years 1939-1945. In general, however, what reliable
statistics there are, especially those relating to emigration, are
sufficient to show that not a fraction of six million Jews could have been
exterminated. In the first place, this claim cannot remotely be upheld on
examination of the European Jewish population figures. According to Chambers
Encyclopaedia the total number of Jews living in pre-war Europe was
6,500,000. Quite clearly, this would mean that almost the entire number were
exterminated. But the Baseler Nachrichten, a neutral Swiss publication
employing available Jewish statistical data, establishes that between 1933
and 1945, 1,500,000 Jews emigrated to Britain, Sweden, Spain, Portugal,
Australia, China, India, Palestine and the United Sutes. This is confirmed
by the Jewish journalist Bruno Blau, who cites the same figure in the New
York Jewish paper Aufbau, August 13th, 1948. Of these emigrants,
approximately 400,000 came from Germany before September 1939. This is
acknowledged by the World Jewish Congress in its publication Unity in
Dispersion (p. 377), which states that: "The majority of the German Jews
succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out." In addition to the
German Jews, 220,000 of the total 280,000 Austrian Jews had emigrated by
September, 1939, while from March 1939 onwards the Institute for Jewish
Emigration in Prague had secured the emigration of 260,000 Jews from former
Czechoslovakia. In all, only 360,000 Jews remained in Germany, Austria and
Czechoslovakia after September 1939. From Poland, an estimated 500,000 had
emigrated prior to the outbreak of war. These figures mean that the number
of Jewish emigrants from other European countries (France, the Netherlands,
Italy, the countries of eastern Europe etc.) was approximately 120,000. This
exodus of Jews before and during hostilities, therefore, reduces the number
of Jews in Europe to approximately 5,000,000. In addition to these
emigrants, we must also include the number of Jews who fled to the Soviet
Union after 1939, and who were later evacuated beyond reach of the German
invaders. It will be shown below that the majority of these, about
1,250,000, were migrants from Poland. But apart from Poland, Reitlinger
admits that 300,000 other European Jews slipped into Soviet territory
between 1939 and 1941. This brings the total of Jewish emigrants to the
Soviet Union to about 1,550,000. In Colliers magazine, June 9th, 1945,
Freiling Foster, writing of the Jews in Russia, explained that "2,200,000
have migrated to the Soviet Union since 1939 to escape from the Nazis," but
our lower estimate is probably more accurate. Jewish migration to the Soviet
Union, therefore, reduces the number of Jews within the sphere of German
occupation to around 3-1/2 million, approximately 3,450,000. From these
should be deducted those Jews living in neutral European countries who
escaped the consequences of the war. According to the 1942 World Almanac (p.
594). the number of Jews living in Gibraltar, Britain, Portugal, Spain,
Sweden, Switzerland, Ireland and Turkey was 413,128.

A figure, consequently, of around 3 million Jews in German- occupied Europe
is as accurate as the available emigration statistics will allow.
Approximately the same number, however, can be deduced in another way if we
examine statistics for the Jewish populations remaining in countries
occupied by the Reich. More than half of those Jews who migrated to the
Soviet Union after 1939 came from Poland. It is frequently claimed that the
war with Poland added some 3 million Jews to the German sphere of influence
and that almost the whole of this Polish Jewish population was
"exterminated". This is a major factual error. The 1931 Jewish population
census for Poland put the number of Jews at 2,732,600 (Reitlinger, Die
Endlösung, p. 36). Reitlinger states that at least 1,170,000 of these were
in the Russian zone occupied in the autumn of 1939, about a million of whom
were evacuated to the Urals and south Siberia after the German invasion of
June 1941 (ibid. p. 50). As described above, an estimated 500,000 Jews had
emigrated from Poland prior to the war. Moreover, the journalist Raymond
Arthur Davis, who spent the war in the Soviet Union, observed that
approximately 250,000 had already fled from German-occupied Poland to Russia
between 1939 and 1941 and were to be encountered in every Soviet province
(Odyssey through Hell, N.Y., 1946). Subtracting these figures from the
population of 2,732,600, therefore, and allowing for the normal population
increase, no more than 1,100,000 Polish Jews could have been under German
rule at the end of 1939. (Gutachen des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte, Munich,
1956, p.80). To this number we may add the 360,000 Jews remaining in
Germany, Austria and former Czechoslovakia (Bohemia-Moravia and Slovakia)
after the extensive emigration from those countries prior to the war
described above. Of the 320,000 French Jews, the Public Prosecutor
representing that part of the indictment relating to France at the Nuremberg
Trials, stated that 120,000 Jews were deported, though. Reitlinger estimates
only about 50,000. Thus the total number of Jews under Nazi rule remains
below two million. Deportations from the Scandinavian countries were few,
and from Bulgaria none at all. When the Jewish populations of Holland
(140,000), Belgium (40,000), Italy (50,000), Yugoslavia (55,000), Hungary
(380,000) and Roumania (725,000) are included, the figure does not much
exceed 3 million. This excess is due to the fact that the latter figures are
pre-war estimates unaffected by emigration, which from these countries
accounted for about 120,000 (see above). This cross-checking, therefore,
confirms the estimate of approximately 3 million European Jews under German

The precise figures concerning Russian Jews are unknown, and have therefore
been the subject of extreme exaggeration. The Jewish statistician Jacob
Leszczynski states that in 1939 there were 2,100,000 Jews living in future
German-occupied Russia, i.e. western Russia. In addition, some 260,000 lived
in the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. According to Louis
Levine, President of the American Jewish Council for Russian Relief, who
made a post-war tour of the Soviet Union and submitted a report on the
status of Jews there, the majority of these numbers were evacuated east
after the German armies launched their invasion. In Chicago, on October
30th, 1946, he declared that: "At the outset of the war, Jews were amongst
the first evacuated from the western regions threatened by the Hitlerite
invaders, and shipped to safety east of the Urals. Two million Jews were
thus saved." This high number is confirmed by the Jewish journalist David
Bergelson, who wrote in the Moscow Yiddish paper Ainikeit, December 5th,
1942, that "Thanks to the evacuation, the majority (80%) of the Jews in the
Ukraine, White Russia, Lithuania and Latvia before the arrival of the
Germans were rescued." Reitlinger agrees with the Jewish authority Joseph
Schechtmann, who admits that huge numbers were evacuated, though he
estimates a slightly higher number of Russian and Baltic Jews left under
German occupation, between 650,000 and 850,000 (Reitlinger, The Final
Solution, p. 499). In respect of these Soviet Jews remaining in German
territory, it will be proved later that in the war in Russia no more than
one hundred thousand persons were killed by the German Action Groups as
partisans and Bolshevik commissars, not all of whom were Jews. By contrast,
the partisans themselves claimed to have murdered five times that number of
German troops.

It is clear, therefore, that the Germans could not possibly have gained
control over or exterminated anything like six million Jews. Excluding the
Soviet Union, the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration
was scarcely more than 3 million, by no means all of whom were interned. To
approach the extermination of even half of six mfilion would have meant the
liquidation of every Jew living in Europe. And yet it is known that large
numbers of Jews were alive in Europe after 1945. Philip Friedmann in Their
Brother's Keepers (N.Y., 1957, p. 13), states that "at least a million Jews
survived in the very crucible of the Nazi hell," while the official figure
of the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee is 1,559,600. Thus, even if one
accepts the latter estimate, the number of possible wartime Jewish deaths
could not have exceeded a limit of one and a half million. Precisely this
conclusion was reached by the reputable journal Baseler Nachrichten of
neutral Switzerland. In an article entitled "Wie hoch ist die Zahl der
jüdischen Opfer?" ("How high is the number of Jewish victims?", June 13th,
1946), it explained that purely on the basis of the population and
emigration figures described above, a maximum of only one and a half million
Jews could be numbered as casualties. Later on, however, it will be
demonstrated conclusively that the number was actually far less, for the
Baseler Nachrichten accepted the Joint Distribution Committee's figure of
1,559,600 survivors after the war, but we shall show that the number of
claims for compensation by Jewish survivors is more than double that figure.
This information was not available to the Swiss in 1946.

Indisputable evidence is also provided by the post-war world Jewish
population statistics. The World Almanac of 1938 gives the number of Jews in
the world as 16,588,259. But after the war, the New York Times, February
22nd, 1948 placed the number of Jews in the world at a minimum of 15,600,000
and a maximum of 18,700,000. Quite obviously, these figures make it
impossible for the number of Jewish war-time casualties to be measured in
anything but thousands. 15-1/2 million in 1938 minus the alleged six million
leaves nine million; the New York Times figures would mean, therefore, that
the world's Jews produced seven million births, almost doubling their
numbers, in the space of ten years. This is patently ridiculous. It would
appear, therefore, that the great majority of the missing "six million" were
in fact emigrants - emigrants to European countries, to the Soviet Union and
the United States before, during and after the war. And emigrants also, in
vast nunibers to Palestine during and especially at the end of the war.
After 1945, boat-loads of these Jewish survivors entered Palestine illegally
from Europe, causing considerable embarrassment to the British Government of
the time; indeed, so great were the numbers that the H.M. Stationery Office
publication No. 190 (November 5th, 1946) described them as "almost amounting
to a second Exodus." It was these emigrants to all parts of the world who
had swollen the world Jewish population to between 15 and 18 millions by
1948, and probably the greatest part of them were emigrants to the United
States who entered in violation of the quota laws. On August 16th, 1963
David Ben Gurion, President of Israel, stated that although the official
Jewish population of America was said to be 5,600,000, "the total number
would not be estimated too high at 9,000,000" (Deutsche Wochenzeitung,
November 23rd, 1963). The reason for this high figure is underlined by
Albert Maisal in his article "Our Newest Americans" (Readers Digest,
January, 1957), for he reveals that "Soon after World War II, by
Presidential decree, 90 per cent of all quota visas for central and eastern
Europe were issued to the uprooted." Reprinted on this page is just one
extract from hundreds that regularly appear in the obituary columns of
Aufbau, the Jewish American weekly published in New York (June 16th, 1972).
It shows how Jewish emigrants to the United States subsequently changed
their names; their former names when in Europe appear in brackets. For
example, as below: Arthur Kingsley (formerly Dr. Königsberger of Frankfurt).
Could it be that some or all of these people whose names are 'deceased' were
included in the missing six million of Europe?
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 06 December 2009 at 02:52
Truly the greatest lie ever told with exception of christ insanity. Why the majority of adults across our world choose to put hands over ears and sing "la la la" when presented with facts astounds me. How much could the jews possibly be paying them? The fact, the admitted fact even by the jews themselves that jewish population INCREASED during the supposed holocaust says everything. You can't have it both ways... you can't have a population consisting of 6-10 million worldwide (as they like to keep estimates of their numbers low, its more like 70-100 million) lose 6 million and then actually have population increase. Unless they are capable of budding like hydras or reproducing assexually (maybe so) there will be a population deficit immediately of course and for at least another generation. The holocaust is simply impossible no matter what you wish to believe.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 06 December 2009 at 15:30
I like that list,  it is now cut and pasted, LOL.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 08 January 2010 at 16:46
Herman Feder

Herman was conscripted by the evil Nazi’s in 1939, but since he was sedentary most of his life, and unable to work, the Nazi’s sent him home without pay.

Then the Nazi’s sent Herman to jail for no reason. Then the Nazi’s sent Herman, who has already acknowledged he was too useless to work, to 7 different labor and death camps. At which Herman apparently experienced neither work nor death. Because Herman was strong when he was young the Nazi`s could not beat him to death. He was buried alive, but remained alive because he prayed and knew that his mother was near.

Herman received letters from his wife in the death camp. Herman gave an SS man a diamond for a piece of bread because there were a lot of diamonds in the concentration camp. Herman was going to die because he gave his soup to Mickey Mouse in exchange for teaching him how to make shoes, but Herman saw a potato in the same road the Jews marched everyday, and he picked it up and ate it. Miracle !

Herman made a pair of shoes for the head chef, who rewarded Herman by giving the men an extra cauldron of soup or mashed potatoes every day. The soup weighed 75 lbs, but the men took it with them 8 miles back to camp. Then the Nazi’s sent Herman to the gas chambers at Bergen-Belsen to be deloused. Herman volunteered to take the bodies off the trains every day, so he could steal a sharp stone. Herman cut his tongue with the sharp stone, and survived without food or water for 5 days by drinking his own blood, even though the Talmud forbids such behaviour.

One night Herman was standing next to the window and could hear the conversation of three or four S.S. men; they only had 4 bullets between them - it was common for the Nazi elite forces to run out of bullets. Then a Russian used a board to break out the steel bars on the windows. Herman ran away. The Nazi’s shot him in the ankle, but Herman kept running, he kept running until he could no longer run - the time frame between him running and eventually falling down is unclear.

Then the doctor removed the bullet without any anesthetic because Herman was strong when he was young.

Source : http://www.humboldt.edu/~rescuers/book/Chlup/federstory1.html (http://www.humboldt.edu/~rescuers/book/Chlup/federstory1.html)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 08 January 2010 at 19:49
True my friend ... but never forget that that the readers of the new and old testament is our main target ... most Whites are followers of that creed ... thats why i try convert xtians ... its a challenge !
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 14 January 2010 at 17:51
Alfred Wetzler

Alfred was 24 when he was sent to the death camp of Auschwitz. Alfred managed to survive for 2 years without being deathed - and so did 7000 other jews - not a good record for a death camp. But the evil Nazi’s did break his arm. And dislocate his foot. And break his head. And had their dogs bite him.

Then Alfred and Walter Rosenberg hid in a woodpile for 4 days. Then they crawled under a hole in the fence. Death camps were well known for having holes in their fences that remained undiscovered for 4 days.

Then they walked through the woods for 11 days. They gave Churchill the label of a can of Zyklon B, which conclusively proved that Jews were being killed with bug spray. So Churchill bombed Hungary. Alfred was responsible for saving 120,000 Jews.

So Alfred wrote his story, but he was such a hero, that he wrote under the psuedonym of Josef Lanyk. Because jews are well known for their modesty. Walter Rosenberg also changed his name, to Rudolph Vrba.

Source : http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/escape-from-auschwitz-told-for-first-time-in-english-454456.html (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/escape-from-auschwitz-told-for-first-time-in-english-454456.html)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 22 January 2010 at 18:20
Alter Weiner

Alter was only 15 years old when the evil Nazi’s captured him, and forced him into slave labor at Blechhammer. The Nazi’s gave Alter only bread made from flour and sawdust to eat for the next 4 years. Here he met his brother that got ten years older in one year. He also got whipped 15 strokes for trying to bribe a Nazi, but got up the next morning to work. He was then moved to the Brande work camp where he was forced to shower all night. Miraculously, Alter survived 5 concentration camps to tell his sad tale to spellbound students.

Doctors who examined him shortly after the "liberation" told him they didn’t expect him to live for more than a few years, but here he is, 82 years old - it must have been a miracle. Alter now wants you to buy his book where you can read about his miracle.

Source : http://www.beavertonvalleytimes.com/news/story.php?story_id=120657762296432000 (http://www.beavertonvalleytimes.com/news/story.php?story_id=120657762296432000)

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 29 January 2010 at 16:49
German Court Pledges 500 Million Euros For Jewish Ghetto Workers

Former Jewish ghetto workers can expect old-age pension payments worth a total of 500 million euros, a German court announced on Wednesday. The Essen court said that German welfare authorities are to run a backdated audit of pension claims, based on a 2009 court ruling in favor of three Holocaust survivors who had demanded a pension after being forced to work by the Nazis.

At the time, the federal court had decided that Nazi victims were entitled to pension payments for work they were forced to carry out in ghettos during World War II. The ruling was also applied to people who had only been paid by receiving food and other gratuities for their work. Until then, such claims had failed in cases where people did not receive wages from their German occupiers.

The Nazis had forced Jewish residents of many German and eastern European cities to live in ghettos, which were cordoned-off and starvation-ravaged zones, before being sent to death camps. [ ... where millions survived - it must have been a miracle]

The social welfare court in Essen is responsible for all pension claims from former ghetto residents who now live in Israel. The court estimated that roughly two thirds of all claims would now be approved. Until now, 90 per cent of all claims were rejected. In total, the pension authorities are faced with around 70,000 claims, of which 30,000 emanate from Israel.

During World War II, the Nazis extensively exploited forced labor because a large part of the German male workforce was doing military service.

Source : http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1145546.html (http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1145546.html)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 02 February 2010 at 19:15
Charlene Schiff

Charlene Schiff, who is really Shulamit Perlmutter, was only a young girl when she escaped from the Nazi’s by hiding in a river. They stayed in the river for days. She then met up with a group of stragglers from other surrounding ghettos. While they hid in a hay bale, they were found by a mob that used pitchforks to attack them, for no reason at all. All the Jews hid in the same haystack. They killed everyone in the haystack except Schiff. Schiff was forced to eat insects and make fire with damp stones in the forests to stay alive.

Charlene does not know why she survived the Holocaust. In her town with 5,000 Jews, there were only two survivors. Schiff is now the only one left because the other passed away in 2002. Because there were no actual records of what happened, Schiff has to rely on rumors to know what happened to her family.

Source : http://www.dailyhelmsman.com/media/storage/paper875/news/2006/04/06/News/Holocaust.Survivor.Describes.Her.Life-1798039.shtml (http://www.dailyhelmsman.com/media/storage/paper875/news/2006/04/06/News/Holocaust.Survivor.Describes.Her.Life-1798039.shtml)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 05 February 2010 at 18:48
Pepkale Dodyk

Pepkale was only 3 years old when the evil Nazi’s and Ukranian police invaded her town. So her and dozens of others fled into a cave with disease-carrying bats. But the Germans raided the cave, and captured Pepkale’s family. The other Jews escaped through a hole they had dug. In the rocks. With their bare hands.

The Germans wanted the Ukranians to shoot Pepkale. But Usher offered his hidden stash of gold and silver to the Ukranians. So the Ukranians fired 5 shots over the heads of the Jews. They let Pepkale, her mother, and Usher live, but they killed the aunt and cousin. So the Jews found another cave. They lived in the cave for 2 years, sleeping 22 hours per day, to conserve energy, because the 38 people did not have any food.

The Ukranians tried to murder them by sealing the entrance to the cave, time and time again. The Ukranians were apparently unfamiliar with fire, and how it might adversely affect people hiding in a cave. Then a message in a bottle came, and Pepkale and the 37 other Jews came out of the cave.

Source : http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1145001/posts (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1145001/posts)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 27 February 2010 at 08:32
Austria To Contribute 6mn To Auschwitz Renovation

Austria is to give a six million-Euro subsidy towards the renovation of Auschwitz concentration camp memorial site in Poland, it was announced today (Tues). People’s Party (ÖVP) Finance Minister Josef Pröll said : "Our plan is to contribute around six million Euros. That’s the benchmark."

Pröll stressed this would be exactly a tenth of the amount of Germany’s subsidies for the planned renovation of the site which is visited by around 700,000 people every year. Germany has around ten times more citizens than Austria.

The minister remained tight-lipped about which department the money would come from. "Details still need to be discussed," he said. The Auschwitz camp was one of the Nazi’s main forced labour and death camps. Up to three million [ ... although the board now says 1.5 million ???] Jews, Roma, Nazi opponents and disabled people died at the site between 1940 and 1945.

Source : http://austrianindependent.com/news/Politics/2010-02-23/1170/Austria_to_contribute_%806mn_to_Auschwitz_renovation (http://austrianindependent.com/news/Politics/2010-02-23/1170/Austria_to_contribute_%806mn_to_Auschwitz_renovation)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 02 March 2010 at 12:41
Compensation and income calculations for government benefits
United States
Tax exemptions for the hebes in the United States......

All Holocaust compensation and restitution payments are protected by 1994 federal legislation that excludes them from calculations relating to eligibility for federal benefits. The legislation (h.r. 1873 or public law 103-286) stated that payments made to individuals because of their status as victims of Nazi persecution are to be excluded from income and resources in determining both eligibility for and the amount of benefits or services to be provided under any Federal or federally assisted program which provides benefits or services based on need such as, but not limited to, Medicaid, Supplemental Security Income, food stamps and Federally subsidized Housing programs.

To view or print the letter from the Social Security Administration, click here.

The New York State Medicaid program made an important ruling reversing an earlier fair hearing decision which would have denied an elderly Holocaust survivor‘s application for Medicaid benefits to pay for his nursing home care
http://www.claimscon.org/index.asp?url=tax_exemptions (http://www.claimscon.org/index.asp?url=tax_exemptions)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 March 2011 at 10:00
Red Cross records can verify the less than 3 million jews in Europe.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 March 2011 at 11:39
The following text was lifted from News-Groups.

Full text:


Did Six Million Really Die?

http://www.zundelsite.org/english/harwood/Didsix01.html (http://www.zundelsite.org/english/harwood/Didsix01.html)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 March 2011 at 14:59
there's an even simpler "answer".....

is it a jew?

then, it's an EFFIN' lie  >:(

this is all ye know and all ye need to know!
(to "para-phrase" William Butler Yeats!)



uh...here youse go.....modern crematoria can only handle 18 bodies a day, max! (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110314/ap_on_bi_ge/as_japan_earthquake)

oh....yeh....the other easy "put down" for the HollowHoaxers is....."Zyk-B"....abt as potent as "bug spray".....you'd have to either eat a coupla cans of the stuff or hang a bucket of it 'round yr neck and inhale deeply for a coupla hrs for it to have an "effect"!

fkn yooz....wtf needs 'em?

.....wtf wants 'em?  >:(
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 07 April 2011 at 00:48
http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk (http://www.tellingfilms.co.uk)

On February 21, 2009 Mahler was sentenced to six years imprisonment without possibility of reduction or bail, by a Munich court of justice; during the verdict the judge said that Mahler had proven "not able to be re-educated" and declared that he as a judge should stop the "nationalist rattle" and "nonsense spread" by Horst Mahler.[19] On March 11 a Potsdam Court sentenced 73 year old Horst Mahler to additional five years imprisonment for Holocaust denial and banalization of Nazi war crimes, due to the perceived danger of an escape attempt, the sentence was to be immediately carried out.[20] It is expected that Mahler will appeal the verdicts.

On March 19, 2009 Mahler's wife, the former university teacher and lawyer Sylvia Stolz, was also convicted and imprisoned for Holocaust denial, and for her claims that a "Jewish foreign power" ruled the German federal authorities and the Western world, and for claiming that the federal German courts practised "Allied victors' justice" by limiting free speech.[21] [Wikipedia]

Bradley R. Smith
http://bradleysmithsblog.blogspot.com (http://bradleysmithsblog.blogspot.com)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 01 June 2011 at 00:40
The "Confessions" of Kurt Gerstein

A holohoax fable, hence it goes in the fiction section! :D

Code: [Select]

What historians are saying about the Roques thesis...

...from now on researchers will have to take his work into account...

-Alain Decaux, member, Academie Francaise

Had I been a member of the jury, I would probably have given a grade of "Very good" to Mr. Roques' thesis.

-Michel de Bouard, Institut de France

This is the expose which shattered the myth of Pope Pius XII's complicity in the Holocaust, and struck at the very roots of the Holocaust story's credibility by challenging the "confessions" of SS officer Kurt Gerstein. Author Henri Roques' doctoral thesis made world headlines in 1986, when for the first time in the history of French academe a duly awarded doctorate was revoked by state fiat.

For the first time, the accusations of Kurt Gerstein - the enigmatic, twisted Third Reich functionary who claimed to have witnessed mass gassings of Jews in 1942 - are here subjected to thorough critical review. Roques' stunning conclusion: not only are Gerstein's allegations of a mass extermination of Jews and a Roman Catholic cover-up of the slaughter groundless, but postwar academics have deliberately manipulated and falsified key parts of Gerstein's tortured testimony.

An indispensable resource for scholar and layman alike, The 'Confessions' of Kurt Gerstein provides transcripts and translations of an unprecedented six versions of Gerstein's story, as well as photocopies of the originals; a searching examination of both the authenticity and credibility of the "confessions"; and numerous documents and records which have never before been published. Henri Roques' thesis is sure to become a classic, not only of meticulous scholarly detective work but of the liberating power of free inquiry in the time-honored Western tradition.

Henri Roques is the first man in the nearly eight-century history of French universities to have his doctorate "revoked" by government order. In 1979, toward the end of his career as an agricultural engineer, Roques, then an amateur in history, was spurred by an intemperate criticism of the work of French Revisionist Robert Faurisson to undertake a critical study of the Gerstein statements and their use in the historiography of the alleged Jewish Holocaust. Roques' careful thesis, which was awarded high marks and for which he was awarded a doctoral degree by the University of Nantes in 1986, was then cancelled by decree of French education minister Alain Devaquet. Roques, 69 years old, now lives in retirement in a suburb of Paris.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 27 June 2011 at 07:09
Israeli envoy backs off praise for Pope

From: AP June 27, 2011

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/israeli-envoy-backs-off-praise-for-pope/story-e6frea73-1226082483636 (http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/breaking-news/israeli-envoy-backs-off-praise-for-pope/story-e6frea73-1226082483636)

ISRAEL'S ambassador to the Vatican backed away from his praise of Pope Pius XII, the World War II-era Pope blamed by some Jews and historians for having failed to speak out enough against the Holocaust.

Ambassador Mordechai Lewy said in a statement that his personal judgment about the role of Pius, the Vatican and Catholic Church during the war had been "premature" since the issue is still being researched.

Lewy made headlines last week when he praised Pius and the Catholic Church in general for having given refuge to Roman Jews during the Nazi occupation of the Italian capital. The Vatican newspaper ran his speech on the front page, giving the brief but significant remarks high visibility.

But some Jewish groups baulked, saying Lewy's comments were morally wrong, historically inaccurate and hurtful to Holocaust survivors.

Pope Benedict XVI is keen to see Pius beatified, the first step to sainthood, and a concerted campaign is under way among Pius' supporters to correct what they say has been an unfair and incorrect judgment passed on Pius.

As a result, Lewy's remarks in praise of Pius, unusual for a Jew much less an Israeli official, were significant in that they indicated a slight shift in the historic judgment of a man the Vatican considers worthy of one of the church's greatest honours, but who many Jews consider a moral coward.

Pius was Pope from 1939-1958. Before his election he served as the Vatican's No 2 and before that papal nuncio to Germany. Given his deep involvement in the Vatican's diplomatic affairs with the Nazis, what Pius did or didn't do during the war has become the single most divisive issue in Vatican-Jewish relations.

The Vatican insists Pius used quiet diplomacy and that speaking out more publicly and critically against the Nazis would have resulted in more Jewish deaths. Critics argue he could have and should have said and done more.

And so eyebrows were raised when Lewy told a ceremony awarding a Righteous of the Nations medal in honour of Gaetano Piccini, an Italian priest who sheltered Jews, that Piccini wasn't alone in saving Jewish lives in Rome.

"It would be an error to declare that the Catholic Church, the Vatican or the Pope himself opposed actions aimed at saving Jews," Lewy said June 23. "The contrary is actually true: they helped wherever they could."

He said the fact that the Vatican couldn't stop the deportation of Jews from Rome's ghetto on October 16-18, 1943 "only increased the will, on the part of the Vatican, to offer its own sites as refuges for the Jews."

He said Jews were traumatised by the deportation and expected much more from the Pope.

"Fine, we all know what happened, but we also must recognise that the train that left on October 18, 1943 was the only one that the Nazis managed to organise from Rome to Auschwitz," he said.

On Sunday, Lewy said he wanted to make a clarification to his remarks, noting that his praise of Piccini's good deeds were embedded in a broader historical context.

"Given the fact that this context is still under the subject of ongoing and future research, passing my personal historical judgment on it was premature," the statement said.

Elan Steinberg, vice president of the group American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants, said he appreciated Lewy's clarification.

"It takes courage to admit a mistake," said Steinberg, who had initially criticised Lewy for his comments.

Jewish leaders have asked that the Vatican not beatify Pius until the complete set of Vatican archives is opened to scholars, which is not expected for several more years. Pius' supporters argue that a good chunk of the documents are already available and that few scholars ever consult them.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 24 August 2012 at 04:53
The lie of the Jewish soap is an old but still widely circulating one. It was only yesterday that I had someone try to tell me about the soap and shrunken heads stories were real, because he'd seen them in a book. Another - a former friend from Blood and Honour Australia who should know better - extended that argument to his belief in Jewish lamp-shades, six-million dead Jews, the gassings, et al, ad nauseam.  The argument is always the same (or a variation of), "I read it in a history book." However, the facts are that the Jewish soap lie (along with the lamp-shades lie, shrunken heads lie and even the six-million lie) has long been refuted by prominent Jewish historians. But because of greedy, manipulating Jews and moronic neo-Nazi wannabes, the myth is perpetuated.


From the  Institute for Historical Review

Jewish Soap, by Mark Weber

http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/soap.shtml (http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/soap.shtml)

One of the most lurid and slanderous Holocaust claims is the story that the Germans manufactured soap from the bodies of their victims. Although a similar charge during the First World War was exposed as a hoax almost immediately afterwards, it was nevertheless revived and widely believed during the Second. [1] More important, this accusation was "proved" at the main Nuremberg trial of 1945-1946, and has been authoritatively endorsed by numerous historians in the decades since. In recent years, though, as part of a broad retreat from the most obviously untenable aspects of the "orthodox" extermination story, Holocaust historians have grudgingly conceded that the human soap tale is a wartime propaganda lie. In their retreat, though, these historians have tried to dismiss the soap story as a mere wartime "rumor," neglecting to mention that international Jewish organizations and then Allied governments endorsed and sanctioned this libelous canard.

Wartime rumors that the Germans were manufacturing soap from the corpses of slaughtered Jews were based in part on the fact that soap bars distributed by German authorities in Jewish ghettos and camps bore the impressed initials "RIF," which many took to stand for "Rein jüdisches Fett" or "Pure Jewish Fat." (It did not seem to matter that the letters were "RIF" and not "RJF.") These rumors spread so widely in 1941 and 1942 that by late 1942 German authorities in Poland and Slovakia were expressing official concern about their impact. [2]

According to a Polish source quoted in a secret wartime U.S. Army military intelligence report, for example, the Germans were operating a "human soap factory" in 1941 at Turek, Poland. "The Germans had brought thousands of Polish teachers, priests and Jews there and after extracting the blood serum from their bodies, had thrown them on large pots and melted off grease to make soap," the intelligence report added. [3]

Macabre "Jewish soap" jokes became popular in the ghettos and camps, and many non-Jews on the outside came to believe the story. When trains loaded with Jewish deportees stopped temporarily at rail stations, Poles reportedly would gleefully shout at them: "Jews to soap!" [4] Even British prisoners of war interned at Auschwitz in 1944 testified later about the wartime rumors that corpses of gassing victims were being turned into soap there. [5]

In spite of its inherently incredible character, the soap story became an important feature of Jewish and Allied war propaganda. Rabbi Stephen S. Wise, wartime head of both the World Jewish Congress and the American Jewish Congress, publicly charged in November 1942 that Jewish corpses were being "processed into such war-vital commodities as soap, fats and fertilizer" by the Germans. He further announced that the Germans were "even exhuming the dead for the value of the corpses," and were paying fifty marks for each body. [6]

In late 1942, the Congress Weekly, published by the American Jewish Congress, editorialized that the Germans were turning Jews "by scientific methods of dissolution into fertilizer, soap and glue." An article in the same issue reported that Jewish deportees from France and Holland were being processed into "soap, glue and train oil" in at least two special factories in Germany. [7] Typical of many other American periodicals, the influential New Republic reported in early 1943 that the Germans were "using the bodies of their Jewish victims to make soap and fertilizer in a factory at Siedlce." [8]

During June and July 1943, two prominent representatives of the Moscow-based "Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee" toured the United States and raised more than two million dollars for the Soviet war effort at a series of mass meetings. At each of these rallies, Soviet Jewish leader Solomon Mikhoels showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses. [9]

After the war the soap story was given important legitimacy at the main Nuremberg trial. L. N. Smirnov, Chief Counsellor of Justice for the USSR, declared to the Tribunal:

"... The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods of complete annihilation of human bodies, which would not only conceal the traces of their crimes, but also to serve in the manufacturing of certain products. In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out."

Smirnov quoted at length from an affidavit by Sigmund Mazur, an Institute employee, which was accepted as Nuremberg exhibit USSR-197. It alleged that Dr. Rudolf Spanner, the head of the Danzig Institute, had ordered the production of soap from corpses in 1943. According to Mazur's affidavit, Dr. Spanner's operation was of interest to high-ranking German officials. Education Minister Bernhard Rust and Health Leader Dr. Leonardo Conti, as well as professors from other medical institutes, came to witness Spanner's efforts. Mazur also claimed to have used the "human soap" to wash himself and his laundry. [10]

A human soap "recipe," allegedly prepared by Dr. Spanner (Nuremberg document USSR-196), was also presented. Finally, a sample of what was supposed to be a piece of "human soap" was submitted to the Nuremberg Tribunal as exhibit USSR-393.

In his closing address to the Tribunal, chief British prosecutor Sir Hartley Shawcross echoed his Soviet colleague: "On occasion, even the bodies of their victims were used to make good the wartime shortage of soap." [11] And in their final judgment, the Nuremberg Tribunal judges found that "attempts were made to utilize the fat from the bodies of the victims in the commercial manufacture of soap." [12]

It is worth emphasizing here that the "evidence" presented at the Nuremberg Tribunal for the bogus soap story was no less substantial than the "evidence" presented for the claims of mass extermination in "gas chambers." At least in the former case, an actual sample of soap supposedly made from corpses was submitted in evidence.

After the war, supposed Holocaust victims were solemnly buried, in the form of soap bars, in Jewish cemeteries. In 1948, for example, four such bars wrapped in a funeral shroud were ceremoniously buried according to Jewish religious ritual at the Haifa cemetery in Israel. [13] Other bars of "Jewish soap" have been displayed as grim Holocaust relics at the Jewish Historical Institute in Warsaw, the Stutthof Museum near Gdansk (Danzig), the Yivo Institute in New York, the Holocaust Museum in Philadelphia, the Jewish Holocaust Centre in Melbourne (Australia), and at various locations in Israel. [14]

>Numerous Jews who lived in German ghettos and camps during the war helped keep the soap story alive many years later. Ben Edelbaum, for example, wrote in his 1980 memoir Growing Up in the Holocaust: [15]

"Often with our rations in the ghettos, the Germans had included a bar of soap branded with initials R.J.F. which came to be known as "RIF" soap. It wasn't until the war had ended that we learned the horrible truth about the bar of soap. Had we known in the ghetto, every bar of "RIF" soap would have been accorded a sacred Jewish funeral in the cemetery at Marysin. As it was, we were completely oblivious to its origin and used the bones and flesh of our murdered loved ones to wash our bodies."

>Nesse Godin was transferred from a ghetto in Lithuania to the Stutthof concentration camp in the spring of 1944. In a 1983 interview, she recalled her arrival there: [16]

"That day they gave us a shower and a piece of soap. After the war we found out the soap was made out of pure Jew fat, Rein Juden Fett, marked in the initials on the soap that I washed with. For all I know sometimes maybe there was a little bit of my father's fat in that soap that I washed with. How do you think I feel when I think about that?"

Mel Mermelstein, the former Auschwitz inmate who was featured in the sensationalized April 1991 cable television movie "Never Forget" (and who sued the Institute for Historical Review and three other defendants for $11 million), declared in a 1981 sworn deposition that he and other camp inmates used soap bars made from human fat. It was an "established fact," he insisted, that the soap he washed with was made from Jewish bodies. [17]

Renowned "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal repeated the soap tale in a series of articles published in 1946 in the Austrian Jewish community paper Der Neue Weg. In the first of these he wrote: [18]

"During the last weeks of March the Romanian press reported an unusual piece of news: In the small Romanian city of Folticeni twenty boxes of soap were buried in the Jewish cemetery with full ceremony and complete funeral rites. This soap had been found recently in a former German army depot. On the boxes were the initials RIF, `Pure Jewish Fat.' These boxes were destined for the Waffen-SS. The wrapping paper revealed with completely cynical objectivity that this soap was manufactured from Jewish bodies. Surprisingly, the thorough Germans forgot to describe whether the soap was produced from children, girls, men or elderly persons."

Wiesenthal went on:

"After 1942 people in the General Government [Poland] knew quite well what the RIF soap meant. The civilized world may not believe the joy with which the Nazis and their women in the General Government thought of this soap. In each piece of soap they saw a Jew who had been magically put there, and had thus been prevented from growing into a second Freud, Ehrlich or Einstein."

In another article he observed: "The production of soap from human fat is so unbelievable that even some who were in concentration camps find it difficult to comprehend." [19]

Over the years, numerous supposedly reputable historians have promoted the durable soap story. [20] Journalist-historian William L. Shirer, for example, repeated it in his best-selling work, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. [21]

Leading Soviet war propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg wrote in his postwar memoir: "I have held in my hand a cake of soap stamped with the legend 'pure Jewish soap', prepared from the corpses of people who had been destroyed. But there is no need to speak of these things: thousands of books have been written about them." [22]

A standard history studies textbook used in Canadian secondary schools, Canada: The Twentieth Century, told students that the Germans "boiled" the corpses of their Jewish victims "to make soap." [23] The Anatomy of Nazism, a booklet published and distributed by the Zionist "Anti-Defamation League" of B'nai B'rith, stated: "The process of brutalization did not end with the mass murders themselves. Large quantities of soap were manufactured from the corpses of those murdered." [24]

A detailed 1981 work, Hitler's Death Camps, repeated the soap story in lurid detail. While noting that "some historians claim that the Nazi manufacture of soap from human fat is just a grim rumor," author Konnilyn Feig nevertheless accepted the story because "most East European camp scholars ... validate the soap stories, and other kinds of bars made from humans are displayed in Eastern Europe -- I have seen many over the years." [25]

New York Rabbi Arthur Schneier repeated the tale at the opening ceremony of the largest Holocaust meeting in history. In his invocation to the "American Gathering of Jewish Holocaust Survivors," held in Washington in April 1983, the Rabbi solemnly declared: "We remember the bars of soap with the initials RJF -- Rein jüdisches Fett, Pure Jewish Fat -- made from the bodies of our loved ones." [26]

In spite of all the apparently impressive evidence, the charge that the Germans manufactured soap from human beings is a falsehood, as Holocaust historians are now belatedly acknowledging. The "RIF" soap bar initials that supposedly stood for "Pure Jewish Fat" actually indicated nothing more sinister than "Reich Center for Industrial Fat Provisioning" ("Reichsstelle für Industrielle Fettversorgung"), a German agency responsible for wartime production and distribution of soap and washing products. RIF soap was a poor quality substitute that contained no fat at all, human or otherwise. [27]

Shortly after the war the public prosecutor's office of Flensburg, Germany, began legal proceedings against Dr. Rudolf Spanner for his alleged role in producing human soap at the Danzig Institute. But after an investigation the charge was quietly dropped. In a January 1968 letter, the office stated that its inquiry had determined that no soap from human corpses was made at the Danzig Institute during the war. [28]

More recently, Jewish historian Walter Laqueur "denied established history" by acknowledging in his 1980 book, The Terrible Secret, that the human soap story has no basis in reality. [29] Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness: "The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes." [30] Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly "rewrote history" when she confirmed in 1981: "The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap." [31]

In April 1990, professor Yehuda Bauer of Israel's Hebrew University, regarded as a leading Holocaust historian, as well as Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel's Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the human soap story is not true. Camp inmates "were prepared to believe any horror stories about their persecutors," Bauer said. At the same time, though, he had the chutzpah to blame the legend on "the Nazis." [32]

In fact, blame for the soap story lies rather with individuals such as Simon Wiesenthal and Stephen Wise, organizations like the World Jewish Congress, and the victorious Allied powers, none of whom has ever apologized for promoting this vile falsehood.

Why did Bauer and Krakowski decide that this was the appropriate time to officially abandon the soap story? Krakowski himself hints that a large part of the motivation for this "tactical retreat" has been to save what's left of the sinking Holocaust ship by throwing overboard the most obvious falsehoods. In the face of the growing Revisionist challenge, easily demonstrable falsehoods like the soap story have become dangerous embarrassments because they raise doubts about the entire Holocaust legend. As Krakowski put it: "Historians have concluded that soap was not made from human fat. When so many people deny the Holocaust ever happened, why give them something to use against the truth?" [33]

The bad faith of those making this calculated and belated concession to truth is shown by their failure to note that the soap myth was authoritatively "confirmed" at Nuremberg, and by their unwillingness to deal with the implications of that confirmation for the credibility of the Tribunal and other supposedly trustworthy authorities in establishing other, more fundamental aspects of the Holocaust story.

The striking contrast between the prompt postwar disavowal by the British government of the infamous "human soap" lie of the First World War, and the way in which a similarly baseless propaganda story from the Second World War was officially endorsed by the victorious Allied powers and then authoritatively maintained for so many years not only points up the dispiriting lack of integrity on the part of so many Western historians, but underscores the general decline in Western ethical standards during this century.

The "human soap" story demonstrates anew the tremendous impact that a wartime rumor, no matter how fantastic, can have once it has taken hold, particularly when it is disseminated as a propaganda lie by influential individuals and powerful organizations. That so many intelligent and otherwise thoughtful people could ever have seriously believed that the Germans distributed bars of soap brazenly labeled with letters indicating that they were manufactured from Jewish corpses shows how readily even the most absurd Holocaust fables can be -- and are -- accepted as fact.

During the First World War, the London Times was apparently the first Allied paper to report (in April 1917) that the Germans were boiling down the bodies of their dead soldiers to make soap and other products. See: Phillip Knightley, The First Casualty (New York: 1975), pp. 105-106. This story was quickly picked up by other papers and widely circulated in the British and American press. In 1925, British Foreign Secretary Sir Austen Chamberlain admitted that the "corpse factory" story had been a lie. See: Arthur Ponsonby, Falsehood in Wartime (New York: 1929), pp. 102, 111-112; Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1988), pp. 8-9.

Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (New York: 1985), pp. 966-967; Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1980), pp. 54, 82, 145, 219; U.S. State Department document 740.001 16 (from 1943), facsimile in Encyclopaedia Judaica (New York and Jerusalem: 1971), vol. 13, pp. 759-760; Bernard Wasserstein, Britain and the Jews of Europe (London: 1979), p. 169; A September 1941 German Einsatzgruppen Security Police report from the Ukraine mentioned equally baseless rumors, reportedly spread by Jews, of a supposed Soviet biological warfare plague bacteria bomb. Even some German soldiers believed the stories. (Ereignismeldung UdSSR, No. 80, Sept. 11, 1941, p. 9)

Secret U.S. Army military intelligence report No. 50, April 27, 1945. National Archives, National Records Center (Suitland, Maryland), RG 153 (JAG Army), Box 497, Files 19-22, Books I and II, Entry 143.

Nachman Blumental, "RIF," Yiddish Culture, Vol. 21, June-July 1959. (Monthly of the Yiddish Culture Association). Apparently published in Israel in Hebrew. A German translation of the original essay was obtained by Ditlieb Felderer through the Encyclopaedia Judaica, Jerusalem. I am grateful to him for a copy.

Douglas T. Frost affidavit, July 16, 1947. Nuremberg document NI-11692. Trials of the War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals (NMT "green series"; Washington, DC: 1949-1953), Vol. 8, p. 624; As noted below in footnote 10, this rumor was authoritatively "confirmed" at the Nuremberg Tribunal.

"Wise Says Hitler Had Ordered 4,000,000 Jews Slain in 1942," New York Herald-Tribune (Associated Press), Nov. 25, 1942. pp. 1, 5; "2 Million Jews Slain by Nazis, Dr. Wise Avers," Chicago Daily Tribune, Nov. 25, 1942; The New York Times, Nov. 26, 1942, p. 16; See also: Raul Hilberg, The Destruction of the European Jews (1985), p. 1118.

"The Spirit Will Triumph" (editorial), and "Corpses for Hitler," p. 11, Congress Weekly (New York: American Jewish Congress), Dec. 4, 1942.

The New Republic, Jan. 18, 1943, p. 65. See also the Communist New Masses editorial of Dec. 8, 1942. p. 21. Both quoted in: James J. Martin, The Man Who Invented 'Genocide' (IHR, 1984), pp. 64, 45; One of the few sober voices among all the hysteria was The Christian Century, which cautioned in a Dec. 9, 1942, editorial: "Dr. Wise's allegation that Hitler is paying $20 each for Jewish corpses to be 'processed into soap, fats and fertilizer' is unpleasantly reminiscent of the 'cadaver factory' lie which was one of the propaganda triumphs of the First World War." Quoted in: Robert W. Ross, So It Was True (Minneapolis: 1980), p. 157.

Gerard Israel, The Jews in Russia (New York: St. Martin's, 1975), p. 180.

Smirnov statement, Feb. 19, 1946. International Military Tribunal, Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal (IMT "blue series"; Nuremberg: 1947-1949), vol. 7, pp. 597-600. Note also Soviet allegation that soap was manufactured from the bodies of people gassed at Auschwitz: IMT ("blue series"), vol. 7, p. 175; Translation of USSR-197 and other Nuremberg Tribunal (IMT) references to the human soap story in: Carlos Porter, Made in Russia: The Holocaust (1988), pp. 73, 85-86, 121-124, 126, 128, 159, 368-377; Note also Nuremberg Tribunal "human soap" documents USSR-196, USSR-264, and USSR-272; We are grateful to Mr. Carlos Porter for his diligent research of the Nuremberg Tribunal's treatment of the "human soap" story.

IMT ("blue series"), vol. 19, p. 506; Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression (NC&A "red series"; Washington, DC: 1946-1948), Suppl. vol. A, p. 134. See also: "Nazis' Soap Factory Used Humans, American Reports" (AP), The Sunday Star (Washington, DC), Dec. 9, 1945, p. B-11.
IMT ("blue series"), vol. 1, p. 252. Facsimile reprint in: Carlos Porter, Made in Russia (1988), p. 159.

Pierre Joffroy, "Anne Frank Martyre," Paris Match, No. 394, Oct. 27, 1956, p. 93.
R. Hilberg, Destruction of the European Jews (1985), p. 967 (n.27); N. Blumental, "RIF," Yiddish Culture, June-July 1959 (cited above); Rabbi Yaakov (Jacob) Riz runs the Holocaust Museum at 1453 Levick St., Philadelphia. See his letter in the Jewish Press (Brooklyn), July 10, 1981, p. 42; Udo Walendy, Adolf Eichmann, Historische Tatsachen No. 18 (Vlotho: 1983), p. 24; Gary Tippet, "Real-life chamber of horrors," The Sun (Melbourne), Feb. 7, 1984.

B. Edelbaum, Growing up in the Holocaust (Kansas City, Mo.: 1980), pp. 217-218.
Jane S. Podesta, "Nesse Godin's memories...", The Washington Times, April 11, 1983, pp. 12B, 13B.
M. Mermelstein deposition, Los Angeles, May 27, 1981, official transcript, p. 40. (Case No. C 356 542)

S. Wiesenthal, "RIF," Der Neue Weg (Vienna), Nr. 17/18, 1946, pp. 4-5.; See also: S. Wiesenthal, "Seifenfabrik Belsetz," Der Neue Weg, Nr. 19/20, 1946, pp. 14-15, and: S. Wiesenthal, "Nochmals RIF," Der Neue Weg, Nr. 21/22, 1946. p. 2; These articles are also cited in: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Bogus 'Nazi Hunter'," The Journal of Historical Review, Winter 1989-90, pp. 444-445 [and in: M. Weber, "Simon Wiesenthal: Fraudulent 'Nazi Hunter'," The Journal of Historical Review, July-August 1995 (Vol. 15, No. 4), pp. 10-11, 15.]

S. Wiesenthal, "Nochmals RIF," Der Neue Weg (Vienna), Nr. 21/22, 1946, p. 2.
Some published works claiming that the Germans manufactured soap from human corpses: "Poland," Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971), Vol. 13, pp. 761-762 (Photo caption: "A German soap factory near Danzig"); Alexander Werth, Russia at War 1941-1945 (New York: Avon, 1965, pb.), p. 918; Office of the Secretary of Defense, Days of Remembrance: A Department of Defense Guide for Commemerative Observance (Washington, DC: USGPO, 1988), p. 18; Norman Davies, God's Playground: A History of Poland (New York: Columbia Univ., 1982), vol. 2, p. 457; Max Weinreich, Hitler's Professors (New York: Yivo, 1946), p. 200; Leon Poliakov and J. Wulf, Das Dritte Reich und seine Diener (East Berlin: Volk und Welt, 1975), p. 165 (photo caption); Gershon Taffet, ed, Extermination of Polish Jews (Lodz: Central Jewish Historical Committee in Poland, 1945), p. 96 (photo caption); Joseph Borkin, The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben (New York: Free Press, 1978) p. 126; Max I. Dimont, Jews, God and History (New York: Signet, 1962?, pb.), p. 382; Gizelle Hersh and P. Mann "Gizelle, Save the Children!" (New York: Everest, 1980), p. 210; Robert W. Ross, So It Was True (Minneapolis: 1980), p. 158; Kitty Hart, I Am Alive (London: Abelard-Schuman, 1962), p. 105; See also: Elie Wiesel, Legends of Our Time (New York: Holt, Rinehard and Winston, 1968), pp. 174-175; H. Kamm, "Elie Wiesel's Hometown," The New York Times, Dec. 9, 1986, p. A9; The soap legend is repeated on a Holocaust memorial erected in 1990 at Miami Beach, Fla., See: M. Bell, "Holocaust Memorial," Orlando (Fla.) Sentinel, Jan. 28, 1990, p. G2.
William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (New York: 1960), p. 971 (note) [or page 1264 of the 1962 softcover edition].

Ilya Ehrenburg, The War: 1941-1945 (Cleveland: World, 1965), p. 30.

Fred McFadden, et al., Canada: The Twentieth Century (Toronto: 1982), section entitled "The Holocaust."

Earl Raab, The Anatomy of Nazism (New York: ADL, 1979), p. 20.

Konnilyn G. Feig, Hitler's Death Camps (New York: 1981), pp. 200-202, 479 (n. 19)

This writer was present at the opening ceremony held at the Landover, Md., Capital Center, on Monday evening, April 11, 1983. Schneier was Rabbi at Park East Synagogue, New York City. The crowd of some 15,000 was later addressed by President Reagan.

N. Blumental "RIF" Yiddish Culture, June-July 1959 (cited above). See also: R. Faurisson, "Le savon juif," Annales d'Histoire Revisionniste (Paris), No. 1, Printemps 1987, pp. 153-159, and, D. Felderer, "Human Soap," The Journal of Historical Review, Summer 1980, pp. 131-139; Dachauer Hefte: "Die Befreiung" (Dachau), Heft 1, Dec. 1985, p. 111 (n. 7).

Erich Kern (Kernmayer), Meineid Gegen Deutschland (1971), pp. 152-163. See also: Deutsche Wochen-Zeitung (Munich), March 29, 1991, pp. 3, 9.

Walter Laqueur, The Terrible Secret (Boston: 1980), pp. 82, 219.

Gitta Sereny, Into That Darkness (London: A. Deutsch, 1974), p. 141 (note).

"Nazi Soap Rumor During World War II," Los Angeles Times, May 16, 1981, p. II/2.

Bill Hutman, "Nazis never made human-fat soap," The Jerusalem Post - International Edition, week ending May 5, 1990; "Holocaust Expert Rejects Charge That Nazis Made Soap From Jews," Northern California Jewish Bulletin, April 27, 1990. (JTA dispatch from Tel Aviv.) Facsimile in: Christian News, May 21, 1990, p. 19; "A Holocaust Belif Cleared Up," Chicago Tribune, April 25, 1990. Facsimile in: Ganpac Brief, June 1990, p. 8.

"A Holocaust Belief Cleared Up," Chicago Tribune, April 25, 1990.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 12 October 2012 at 09:35
Hunting Evil, by Author Guy Walters

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1310725/Why-I-believe-king-Nazi-hunters-Simon-Wiesenthal-fraud.html?openGraphAuthor=%2Fhome%2Fsearch.html%3Fs%3D%26authornamef%3DGuy%2BWalters (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1310725/Why-I-believe-king-Nazi-hunters-Simon-Wiesenthal-fraud.html?openGraphAuthor=%2Fhome%2Fsearch.html%3Fs%3D%26authornamef%3DGuy%2BWalters)

Quote from: Private
In my view, Simon Wiesenthal was a liar and a fraud. In fact, I’d go so far as to say he was one of the biggest conmen of the 20th century.

I spent four years working on a history of Nazi-hunting that was published last year, and the material I gathered on Wiesenthal was enough to make me scream out loud.

When I started my book, I too believed that the great man was just that — great.

But when I looked at all his memoirs, biographies and original archive material, I realised that, like so many others, the image I had built up of Simon Wiesenthal was hopelessly incorrect.

Deconstructing Simon Wiesenthal

By Lawrence Swaim | January 6, 2010

http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/deconstructing-simon-wiesenthal-by-lawrence-swaim.html (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/deconstructing-simon-wiesenthal-by-lawrence-swaim.html)

The Simon Wiesenthal Center in Los Angeles, California, is named after the famed Austrian Nazi-hunter, Simon Wiesenthal, a connection that turns out to be appropriate in disturbing but unexpected ways. That is, both Simon Wiesenthal and the Center named after him have been accused of flagrant lying, exaggerations and half-truths. Wiesenthal’s confabulations were never a matter of published discourse among scholars, so far as this writer can determine, nor were they popular knowledge until quite recently. In any case, it is now known that Wiesenthal, a born story-teller, rarely let the facts get in the way of a good story—in fact many of the things he claimed to have done were fabrications. This recently came to light with the publication, in June of 2009, of Hunting Evil, by British Author Guy Walters, in which he characterizes Simon Wiesenthal as “a liar—and a bad one at that.” Wiesenthal, he maintains, would “concoct outrageous stories about his war years and make false claims about his academic career.” Walters found that there were “so many inconsistencies between his three main memoirs and between those memoirs and contemporaneous documents, that it is impossible to establish a reliable narrative from them. Wiesenthal’s scant regard for the truth makes it possible to doubt everything he ever wrote or said.”1

The Wiener Library, one of the world’s oldest and most reputable institutions for the study of the Holocaust, has endorsed this revaluation of Wiesenthal. That is interesting because one assumes that they, like many others in the field of Holocaust Studies, may have been aware for some time that there were problems with Wiesenthal’s resume. The Wiener Library’s Director Ben Barkow concluded that “accepting that Wiesenthal was a showman and a braggart and, yes, even a liar, can live alongside acknowledging the contribution he made.”

Daniel Finkelstein, grandson of the Wiener Library’s founder, had this to say in an August 2009 article in the London Times about Guy Walters’ Hunting Evil: “Walters’s documentary evidence on Wiesenthal’s inconsistencies and lies is impeccable. He shows how the Nazi hunter’s accounts of his wartime experiences are contradictory and implausible. He demonstrates that he had no role, contrary to his own assertion, in the capture of Adolf Eichmann. He pitilessly dissects Wiesenthal’s overblown claims about the number he brought to justice, suggesting it was not much more than a handful. [more ... (http://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/deconstructing-simon-wiesenthal-by-lawrence-swaim.html)]

More on Simon Wiesenthal at the Institute for Historical Review http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/wiesenthal.shtml (http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/wiesenthal.shtml)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 November 2012 at 01:06
Keeping Memory Alive for the Holocaust-Obsessed
By Bradley R. Smith

Haaretz reports that a new survey to mark International Holocaust Memorial Day found that only 6 percent of Israeli children cite history lessons as a significant source of learning about the Holocaust (http://tinyurl.com/9xgerqp (http://tinyurl.com/9xgerqp)).
The annual survey, conducted by the Massuah Institute for Holocaust Studies, shows school education has a very limited influence on shaping young Israelis' understanding of the Holocaust.

Only 0.5 percent said the Holocaust memorial ceremonies, which take place for Israeli children throughout their school years, were significant in their Holocaust education.
Almost 40 percent cited survivors' testimonies (memory) as having the highest educational value.
*** We learn via The New York Times (http://tinyurl.com/8rcrjhn (http://tinyurl.com/8rcrjhn)) that one procedure to develop memory, one encouraged by many in the Holocaust-Obsessed community, is to welcome teenagers and others to reproduce the tattoos of old folk onto their own arms, or perhaps any other part of their body. That way their skin will say "Never Forget."
"When Eli Sagir showed her grandfather, Yosef Diamant, the new tattoo on her left forearm, he bent his head to kiss it. Mr. Diamant had the same tattoo, the number 157622, permanently inked on his own arm by the Nazis at Auschwitz. Nearly 70 years later, Ms. Sagir got hers at a hip tattoo parlor in down-town Jerusalem after a high school trip to Poland. The next week, her mother and brother also had the six digits inscribed onto their forearms. This month, her uncle followed suit.
Continue Reading http://codoh.com/sites/default/files/downloads/SR194.pdf (http://codoh.com/sites/default/files/downloads/SR194.pdf)

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 12 February 2013 at 06:07

yeh.....well....for any-one actually attempting to give a damn.....here youse go.....

the Bletchley Park intercepts! (http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/ww2decrypts.html)

head of MI6/WWII (V Cavendish-Bentnick) calls  'accounts' of gassed jooz "atrocity storie (http://www.whatreallyhappened.info/decrypts/Cavendish_Bentinck.pdf)s"!

*bottom line*
so....wtf else is 'new', eh?!?
wtf really cares, eh?!?..........one way or t'other.....it's ancient history ............  :( 

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 10 March 2013 at 14:15
It's out of print, but an interesting book relating to this figure is The Vatican's Holocaust, an account of events in Croatia during World War Two.  Ante Pavelic, with the consent of the Germans, and the Vatican's blessing established the Independent State of Croatia.
Pavelic had a simple ratio for the Serbs:  one third would be murdered; one third would be converted to Catholicism; and one third would be exiled.  Assisting in this process were Catholic priests who participated in forced conversions, and in some instances ran concentration camps.
Lest the faithful doubt:  The Pope had a legate in this area, and was well aware of events in the area.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 01 April 2013 at 04:54
compilation of the tales of Nazi dogs
Jewish Canadian writer Erna Paris, claims in her 1985 book Unhealed Wounds,
Gestapo officer Klaus Barbie trained a dog to have sex with women. She writes:
"Women were always tortured naked, to the deep enjoyment of the torturers. Barbie kept two German shepherd dogs.  One was trained to lunge and bite. The other was trained to mount naked women who had first been ordered on their hands and knees. A humiliation that cut deeper than the whip, than having one’s fingernails pulled."
More Bestilaity
Jewish, or just married to a Jew (depends who you ask) Auschwitzer Olga Lengyel
states in her 1947 book Five Chimneys: The Story of Auschwitz
"I shall never forget the agony of one mother who told me that she wasforced to undress her daughter and to look on while the girl wasviolated by dogs whom the Nazis had specially trained for this sport"
Cabbage Patch Jews & man eating dogs
Moscow based American journalist, & communist, Richard Lauterbach, wrote an article which appeared in the Sept 11, 1944 issue of TIME (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775229-1,00.html) & Sept 18, 1944 issue of LIFE (http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Wk8EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA17&dq=richard%20lauterbach%20jew&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q=%22early%20on%20suday%20morning%22&f=false) magazines, regarding what he witnessed at the recently Soviet-liberated Majdanek, a Nazi concentration camp in Poland:

Dr. Mengele's Musical Dog

Dr. Josef Mengele, the hardest working Nazi in the Third Reich. Aside from choosing who lived and who was gassed, performing ghastly experiments, picking the whores for the Auschwitz brothels, also found the time to train a dog to attack Jewish musicians for playing the wrong notes.
aish.com a Jewish website, tells the tale
"What is less known about Mengele, at least until this article was published, is that he was a devotee of classical music. In fact, in the same building known as "the experimentation block" there was a "music room" in which he would indulge his talent of violin playing. When the above-mentioned woman arrived at Auschwitz, Mengele noted in her record that she was a pianist and asked her to perform for him. He was so impressed with her talents that he decided to give her special treatment, a privilege that ultimately spared her life.
In addition to the usual slave labor to which all inmates were subjected, this woman had to perform periodically for Mengele, often while the latter would accompany her on his violin. In particular, the article relates, he loved to have her play Shubert's "Serenade" and the religious hymn, "Ave Maria."
So important was music to Mengele, that he trained one of his dogs to be sensitive to every nuance of his favorite compositions. If ever the woman would play a note inaccurately, the dog would pounce on her and viciously bite her. This happened many times when she was forced to perform before Mengele when she was unable to concentrate fully on her playing, such as after she had contracted tuberculosis.
She had at least ten scars all over her body resulting from dog-bites incurred by lapses in her performance."
The Nazi dogs with cancer inflicting poison teeth experiment

(http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o67c7n8Qznk/TOqHlLLlaCI/AAAAAAAABes/xMf-DemV-BM/s400/Nazi%2BDog%2Band%2BHitler.jpg) (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_o67c7n8Qznk/TOqHlLLlaCI/AAAAAAAABes/xMf-DemV-BM/s1600/Nazi%2BDog%2Band%2BHitler.jpg)(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_o67c7n8Qznk/TOqGMeFO0fI/AAAAAAAABek/7NeoCeNUbRk/s400/claimsConf.gif) (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_o67c7n8Qznk/TOqGMeFO0fI/AAAAAAAABek/7NeoCeNUbRk/s1600/claimsConf.gif)

Claims Conference Programs:Fund for Victims of Medical Experiments and Other Injuries
[/color]website (http://www.claimscon.org/index.asp?url=medex/case_summary)[/url][/b][/size]Personal Statements From VictimsNote: The following are testimonies of living individuals who were subjected to Nazi medical experiments and who were identified by the Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany (Claims Conference).Mr. G, Age 82Place of Persecution: Rabka bei Zakopane
Date: 1942

"[In] 1940-1941 we were living in Krakow, Poland. The Nazis started to build the ghetto. My father finds a house in the province, in between Krakow and Zakopane. The village is called Rabka. This happened because we did not want to go to the ghetto. The SS and the Gestapo robbed all of our possessions from the villa we lived in. And they took us along. I, 20 years [old] at that time, resist, and as a result I was subjected to medical experiments.
What I am about to write you have not heard or read before, as follows: Me and a Jewish American (a watchmaker, passport from the USA) were subjected to medical experiments. SS German Shepherd dogs, belonging to the commander of the SS Obersturmfuehrer Rosenbaum, with a special poison on their teeth … we had to run [and] the dogs had to chase us. Afterwards they examined our wounds, the blood. A doctor … ripped the flesh of my legs and examined it. After some time I was able to escape. First to a peasant in a village—afterwards to friends of mine in Krakow. There my wounded legs started healing. As a result of this experiment (the dog bite and the poison) my whole left foot was ripped apart and during the course of the years I developed wounds and cancer.
  Cabbage Patch Jews & man eating dogs
Moscow based American journalist, & communist, Richard Lauterbach, wrote an article which appeared in the Sept 11, 1944 issue of  (http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,775229-1,00.html)TIME[/url] & Sept 18, 1944 issue of  (http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Wk8EAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA17&dq=richard%20lauterbach%20jew&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q=%22early%20on%20suday%20morning%22&f=false)LIFE[/url] magazines, regarding what he witnessed at the recently Soviet-liberated Majdanek, a Nazi concentration camp in Poland:[/i][/b][/size][/size][/size][/font]
"I had to blink twice to take in the jarring realities: the 14 machine-gun turrets jutting into the so-blue sky; the 12-ft.-high double rows of electrically charged barbed wire; the kennels which once housed hundreds of gaunt, man-eating dogs."[/i][/b][/size][/size][/color][/color][/size][/font]
"The big, leafy cabbages were covered with a sooty, grey dust and next to them were high mounds of grey brown stuff. "This," said Kudriavtsev, "is fertilizer. A layer of human bones, a layer of human ashes, a layer of manure. This is German food production. Kill people; fertilize cabbages.""
"the Nazis carted the bodies, straight from the gas chambers. They cut them up scientifically. They put the chunks on iron stretchers, slid them on rollers into the five greedy mouths of the coke-fed ovens. They could disintegrate 1,900 people a day. "There was great economy," said Kudriavtsev. "These furnaces also heated the water for the camp."

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 01 April 2013 at 06:53
Mengele rescued me from inside a gas chamber
This the affidavit of Regina Bialek on how she was a bit gassed at Auschwitz. The affidavit was prepared for the Belsen Trial of 45 former SS members and concentration camp functionaries.
This is a genuine quote, with picture to illustrate the scene described by the former inmate at Auschwitz:
"There were seven gas chambers at Auschwitz.
This particular one was underground and the lorry was able to run down the slope and straight into the chamber.
Here we were tipped unceremoniously on the floor.

[font=]The room was about 12 yards square and small lights on the wall dimly illuminated it. When the room was full a hissing sound was heard coming from the centre point on the floor and gas came into the room.[/font]
After what seemed about ten minutes
some of the victims began to bite their hands and foam at the mouth, and blood issued from their ears, eyes and mouth, and their faces went blue.

I suffered from all these symptoms, together with a tight feeling at the throat.

I was half conscious when my number was called out by Dr. Mengele
and I was led from the chamber."
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 01 April 2013 at 07:35
Ho£ocaust Survivor Liar, they're "numerous"

Germaine Tillion (1907 - 2008) was a anthropologist, a veteran of the French Resistance, a survivor of
the Nazi concentration camp Ravensbrueck, and one of just five women in France's Legion of Honour.
Survivors of nazi concentration camps ..my..my..my...my..my..
Germaine Tillion is quoted in the 1954 book Le Systeme Concentrationnaire Allemand
(The German Concentration Camp System) stating that Ho£ocaust survivors who lie are:
"very much more numerous than people generally suppose, and a subject like that of the concentration camp world—well designed, alas, to stimulate sado-masochistic imaginations—offered them an exceptional field of action. We have known numerous mentally damaged persons, half-swindlers and half fools, who exploited an imaginary deportation. We have known others of them—authentic deportees—whose sick minds strove to even go beyond the monstrosities that they had seen or that people said happened to them."
The Nuremberg Trials and the Holocaust (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html)
Do the 'war crimes' trials prove extermination? (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html)
by Mark Weber (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Webera.html)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 14 April 2013 at 12:47
I don't know where these people get these crazy stories, whether they actually bear any semblance to actual events in the concentration camps is doubtful given that it is one of the most inflated and lied about occurrences in the 20th century. Maybe some of that gross * did happen, Nazi Germany or no, there are sickos and nut jobs everywhere. I would be interested to read that book but I think I've looked into the holohoax enough to make my mind up.  8)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 April 2013 at 00:23
Zionist 'Nazi Hunters' Group Criticizes Australia's Alleged Lack of Action

ABC (Australia) (http://www.abc.net.au/)

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-08/nazi-hunters-criticise-australias-lack-of-action/4615006 (http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-04-08/nazi-hunters-criticise-australias-lack-of-action/4615006)

An organisation which hunts Nazi war criminals has criticised Australia and several other countries for failing to do enough to bring alleged perpetrators of the Holocaust to justice. In its 12th annual report, the Israel branch of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre accuses a raft of nations of failing to prosecute or investigate alleged Nazis ... Only the United States scored an "A" on the report, with Canada, Germany, Hungary, Italy and Serbia each earning a "B". At the bottom of the table, Australia, Austria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Ukraine, Norway, Sweden and Syria were all given "F" grades.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 April 2013 at 00:46
Ynet News (Israel) (http://www.ynetnews.com/)

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4364642,00.html (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4364642,00.html)

About 50 men in their 90s are to stand trial for their service as guards in the Auschwitz Nazi death camp during World War II. The WAZ German news website reported that legal proceedings will be opened against the suspects who will be charged with accessory to murder ... The cases against the 50 suspects lack eyewitnesses. Nevertheless, the Central Office for the Investigation of National Socialist Crimes (COINS) hopes written records from the Nazi period will suffice for a conviction - as they did in Demjanjuk's case.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 April 2013 at 13:31
 ::)  Oh those death camps! such horrible things happen there and I'd rather you didn't talk about them.. you see my Grand dad was in one and died...HE FELL OFF A GUARD TOWER!
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 April 2013 at 15:29
::)  Oh those death camps! such horrible things happen there and I'd rather you didn't talk about them.. you see my Grand dad was in one and died...HE FELL OFF A GUARD TOWER!

... into the inmate's in-ground, Olympic swimming pool and drowned  :o
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 28 April 2013 at 16:40
It just shows the jews pathetic vindictiveness. They never forget, they never forgive and they never learn either. Thats why the world hates them and always will until they are no more.
It is also a cover for the crimes the Jews are now doing such as holding 3 million Palestinians in the worlds largest concentration camp i,e Gaza. The daily atrocities  and murder of teens/ observers/ aid workers and pregnant women in occupied Palestine.
The Jews trial of senile Germans who probably can't remember what they had for breakfast covers up the Jews continuous "conspiracy to wage war" (NB a crime for which a thousand German Generals were hanged). Wars in Iraq, Afghanistan,  using depleted Uranium (another war crime). The continued subversionand intrigue they undertake in Egypt, Pakistan, Syria, Libya etc.
Since their Evil Religion is the sole source of their war against mankind and all the nations of the world- the only wonder is "why are jews everywhere not under physical attack?"
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 24 July 2013 at 22:50
Interview with Bradley Smith, Founder of CODOH (http://bradleysmithsblog.blogspot.mx)

Published by Carolyn Yeager | July 20, 2013

http://carolynyeager.net/interview-bradley-smith-founder-codoh (http://carolynyeager.net/interview-bradley-smith-founder-codoh)

http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/tWn_Saturday_Afternoon_with_Carolyn_Yeager_20130720.mp3 (http://carolynyeager.net/system/files/tWn_Saturday_Afternoon_with_Carolyn_Yeager_20130720.mp3)

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 23 December 2014 at 05:00
86 Year Old German Woman lays charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany

Justice for Germans (http://justice4germans.com/) | 17 December 2014

http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany (http://justice4germans.com/2014/12/17/86-year-old-german-woman-lays-charges-against-the-central-council-of-the-jews-in-germany)


Here is a story you won’t hear in the “mainstream media” nor the alternative, unless it is first put through the wash and spin cycle. Thus,  I will do my best to simply translate and present this important and very newsworthy story to the world for consideration as provided by the original author, whom I shall introduce, as well as provide some context for her perspective, as well as my own.

Frau Ursula Haverbeck, born in 1928,  is an 86 year old survivor of the genocidal Allied terror bombing, the Russian onslaught of rape and pillage on Germany’s Eastern frontier, the anti-German pogroms and expulsions, and the post-war Morgenthau Plan of mass starvation perpetrated against Germany, the enslavement and mass murder of surrendered German soldiers as well as, of the post-war cultural genocide of the German nation by the criminal victors.

Many today still live in “denial” of these obvious and provable crimes, but no law prevents anyone from voicing their denial, so no one has ever been jailed for denying these facts. Nor is any notion of “collective guilt and punishment” forced upon the citizens of the nations which perpetrated these monstrous “war crimes” and “crimes against humanity”. The peoples of the Allied nations have not been divided, and had their land, culture and heritage stolen. Nor have they been forced to pay reparations to the Germans for this “Unholicaust”.  No one has ever been jailed for spreading “false news” and “inciting hatred” toward the German people, though it is committed daily in the mass media;  in books, films, TV shows, newspaper articles, schools, and in everyday average conversation amongst people everywhere.

Frau Haverbeck is a very learned, lucid and articulate lady, who is in good physical and mental health. She holds several university degrees, including in the field of Education. She, along with her late husband (a professor and former Eastern Front soldier) were both, in past years, very involved with environmental concerns in Germany, and were activists for the preservation of the German language and culture.

On November 20th, 2014, Frau Haverbeck made history by laying criminal charges against the Central Council of the Jews in Germany, under S. 344 of German Penal Code with “False Prosecutions” perpetrated against innocent Germans concerning their “denial of the holocaust” (TM).  The crime of False Prosecution is punishable with up to 10 years imprisonment.

In this recent video entitled “The Biggest Problem of Our Time”, she cited the ever diminishing publicly acknowledged numbers of Jews who died at Auschwitz, as already acknowledged by official sources, and which can also be read by all on the plaque outside the former Auschwitz camp.

She referred to an article to this effect in the nationally published magazine “Der Spiegel” in 2002.  Frau Haverbeck also stated that original NS German documents concerning the exact orders pertaining to the duties at Auschwitz which had been seized by the Soviet Union after the war, were now in possession of the mainstream “Institut für Zeitgeschicht” (Institute for History), and also available to the public for a fee of €124.00 since 2000.

Frau Haverbeck says that “these documents indicate very clearly, in full detail,  that the Auschwitz camp was not an ‘Extermination Camp’, but rather a ‘labour camp’ for the defence industry, and moreover, that those in charge of its operation were under orders to maintain the health of the prisoners to the best of their ability for the purposes of production, which was essential for the continuing war effort”.  She adds, “that is what those who worked there and have been accused of war crimes have always maintained!”

“Surely by now” Frau Haverbeck says “an official revision which encompasses these facts should have taken place and that all  judgments made against so-called ‘deniers’ should have been overturned, as the evidence is available which supports their position, but nothing of the sort has happened. Many are still sitting in jail to this day.  This puts the onus back on the accusers who continue to claim that 6 Million Jews were exterminated, to show us where the physical evidence is that supports their claim. Where are they?”

Frau Haverbeck stated that “I and others have petitioned every possible government department and branch of justice and have provided them with these documents, and yet nothing has happened. There has been no reply!  The reason for that must be that they have no response as they have no evidence, as there was no holocaust”.

“If this was an indeed such an ‘open and shut case’ that is irrefutable, as the courts have ruled over and over again, and which they never tire of telling us, their case cannot rest upon any so-called ‘secret order’ . And for them to now have to acknowledge a drastically reduced number of victims is for them also not possible, given the alleged  singularity of this event,  as the one and the only, and the biggest and most heinous crime ever committed. Then let us consider and compare this with the ‘Rheinwiesenlager’ (Eisenhower’s Death Camps), Dresden, Hiroshima, and horrors experienced by the many millions of German expellees and refugees from the East!”

Frau Haverbeck then goes on to state that “in statements made at Nuremberg, no one testified to the presence of any gas chambers, and that confessions, particularly those of Rudolf Höss, are now well known to have been extracted through unimaginable, excruciating torture, to which anyone would have confessed to the mass murder of millions. No testimony, received by such means,  as legal experts know, can be given consideration. Why is it that there should even be such a law as S. 130 that should deny us the ability to question this? And how is it that the entire body of defence testimony and uncountable volume of physical evidence which they tried to provide was completely ignored or destroyed? Such could only have proved to have been incriminating if something sinister had actually taken place. Obviously, they (the prosecutors) could prove nothing, and so these witnesses and their evidence had to disappear.”

She goes on to question how this is possible in Germany for the authorities to ignore, and asks whose interests these “authorities” and “academics” etc truly serve? (This roughly the first 10 minutes of the 19 minute long video. I’ll leave it there in the interest of time and length.)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn39uHrEKo (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Arn39uHrEKo)

In a statement posted on her website at http://ursula-haverbeck.info (http://ursula-haverbeck.info) Frau Haverbeck writes:

Quote from: Private
“After weeks of reading on the internet that ‘there was no Holocaust’ all processes in which critical-thinking citizens convicted of Holocaust denial under section 130, paragraph 3 of the Criminal Code must now be re-opened .

These citizens have committed no other crime other than that they came to the same conclusions earlier, that there may not have been any such “holocaust”, because of their own due diligence and scientific knowledge.

All interested parties should immediately consult the competent courts in order to make them now aware of this new evidence. Then, contact their respective lawyers to clarify as to how to proceed.

It was outrageous what took place after the reduction of the number of victims of Auschwitz, which was officially announced to the public, with no explanation, nor apology for giving false information.  Whereas, the ‘Spiegel’  Editor, who wrote the same thing in an essay based upon the new archival discoveries, etc., has gone unpunished.

Even more serious and incompatible with the rule of law was the simultaneous arrest and jailing of the chemist Germar Rudolf.  He had, with his chemistry expertise and his scientific investigations into Zyklon B as a potential gassing agent, come to the conclusion that the holocaust, as hitherto described, could not have happened at Auschwitz.

Now this is unacceptable: on the one side, the documents of the Commandant of Auschwitz show that this was a labor camp for the defence industry and not an extermination camp, yet the Ludwigsburg Central Office for prosecution of ‘National Socialist crimes’ has indicted about thirty men, now over ninety years old, on the charge that they had been involved an the extermination camp at Auschwitz, and in the murder of hundreds of thousands of people.

If the German citizen is still the supreme sovereign under the Basic Law in this Federal Republic of Germany, then each of us has a responsibility for the truth, and a right to expect that justice be done.  This is the basic responsibility of every citizen. It is, therefore, also the duty of each to also work towards the restoration of law and justice.”

Approx. 2,000 Germans are charged each year in Germany under S.130 of Penal Code for “Holocaust Denial” which is punishable with up to 5 years imprisonment and fines, and also has social penalties, as those convicted find themselves unable to work and shut out of organizations, etc. In the media they are demonized and vilified as “Neo-Nazis” and “right-wing extremists”. The term “Nazi” is, as I have previously reported, a pejorative term created by the enemies of National Socialism long before Hitler ever came to power, and it is still wielded as a weapon to this day, in Germany and elsewhere, to stifle dissent and discussion, and to incite hatred.

Frau Haverbeck, herself, has been labelled as such and has previously been charged and convicted as a “Holocaust denier” and also with “Volksverhetzung” (inciting hatred) for her efforts to speak out on behalf of the German people who to do this day are burdened with the alleged guilt of starting the war, of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the systematic mass murder of the European Jews.

Questioning any of this in “liberated” Germany is punishable with imprisonment. Presenting evidence to the contrary is not allowed. It is also forbidden in Canada and many European nations. Here is just a partial list of others (Germans and non-Germans) who have been tried, convicted, stalked, harassed and violently attacked for sharing their views and for presenting factual evidence contrary to the official and legally enforced narrative.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 29 July 2015 at 00:26
Renegade Tribune (http://renegadetribune.com/) | Paddy England (http://renegadetribune.com/author/paddyengland/) | 22 July 2015

http://renegadetribune.com/uk-ww2-revisionist-open-public-meeting/ (http://renegadetribune.com/uk-ww2-revisionist-open-public-meeting/)

Hull hosted possibly the first ever World War 2 Revisionist Open Public Meeting in the UK.

On Wednesday evening, the 15th of July, over 70 people calmly and thoughtfully listened to Dr. Nick Kollerstrom’s two hour presentation Breaking the Spell: Holocaust Myth and Reality.

This presentation by Dr. Kollerstrom, who specialises in the history of science, was a fact based look at what actual material evidence tells us about the German work camps during the period of World War 2. Using documentary archives and chemical analysis of samples taken from the work camps this presentation sought to clarify three main issues: Is there actual evidence to show that Germany planned the mass murder of Jews or other groups? Is there evidence of gas chambers? Is there evidence to show 6 million Jews were killed?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WElFNw-67Hk (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WElFNw-67Hk)

Dr Kollerstrom analysed the archived British Intelligence information collected from breaking the German war time codes with the famous Enigma machine. These provide a unique insight into life in the camps for a thirteen month period in 1941 and 1942. Historians have largely ignored the information furnished in these intercepts relating to “arrivals,” “departures,” recorded deaths and other events at these camps. The only reasonable explanation for this embarrassing omission is that the intercepted data seriously contradicts, even refutes, the orthodox “Holocaust” narrative. The revealed information does not expose a program of mass murder and racial genocide. Quite the opposite: it reveals that the Germans were determined, desperate even, to reduce the death rate in their work camps, which was caused by catastrophic typhus epidemics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCkaJnAmEh4 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCkaJnAmEh4)

A spokesperson for the organisers said, “The audience listened intently and responded with thoughtful questions and discussion. This is possibly the first time that these issues have been discussed in an open public meeting anywhere in the UK. This shows that 70 years after the war the public are ready to investigate actual events rather than be swayed by Hollywood or war time propaganda.”


More: The classical Jew denunciation
http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2008/may/04/highereducation (http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2008/may/04/highereducation)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCvblLcz0-E (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tCvblLcz0-E)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 07 September 2015 at 05:54
Sentence of death at Horst Mahler interrupted due to illness

Especially grotesque legal contortions affords the BRD system at the moment in the case of Horst Mahler. Since 2009 he is in detention. At that time he was already 73 years old and a 12 year should settle for expressing opinions which are in this state, not unlike Orwell's "1984" -Anti-utopia ", as criminal offenses.

Since the life expectancy for men is now at 77 years, the judgments were set out to let him die in prison, the little health-promoting conditions of detention would naturally speed up the process even more. The knew and you did well also.

In glorious Basic Law, it is true: "The death penalty is abolished." (Article 102). But that does not mean that they could not come in through the back door again.

After the detention of the old man has now namely a health collapse, led to the foreseeable result, the system does surprise and tried to act human, by interrupting the adhesive in accordance with § 455 Code of Criminal Procedure for enforcement incapacity. In reality, however, as if you take a delinquent after the first impulse from the chair, transported to the hospital and so far cures that you can proceed.

"Prison break" just only means that the prisoner immediately marched back to the penitentiary as soon as his condition has improved.

Horst Mahler is and remains the first German to which in Germany officially the death penalty is carried out. On his grave stone would one day stand: Executed. Of course it was not a child murderer, the one has made the subject of this premiere, but a political opponent. Something else was also unlikely.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 26 September 2015 at 01:28
http://news.yahoo.com/alleged-auschwitz-radio-operator-charged-204121024.html (http://news.yahoo.com/alleged-auschwitz-radio-operator-charged-204121024.html)

Prosecutors from the northern German state of Schleswig-Holstein have charged a 91-year-old German woman - whose name has not been revealed because of German privacy laws - with 260,000 counts of accessory to murder, the Associated Press reported on Monday. The nonagenarian allegedly worked as a radio operator for the commandant at the Auschwitz concentration camp complex from April to July 1944. There are no signs that she is unfit to stand trial, says Heinz Doellel, a spokesman for the prosecutors, but a court may not decide whether to pursue her case until next year, the AP reported.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 26 September 2015 at 09:32
For now are still running about 30 (NS) Investigation for crimes in Germany. Mr. Kurt Schrimm (prosecutor) and since 2000 head of the "Central Office of the State Justice Administrations for the Investigation of National Socialist Crimes" in Ludwigsburg. He already investigated against SS-Oberscharführer Josef Schwammberger, who was arrested in 1987 and was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1992. Schrimm is a willing executor of ZOG.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 16 October 2015 at 23:53
Warsaw Acts Over Historian's Claim That Poles Killed More Jews Than Germans in WW2
http://news.yahoo.com/warsaw-acts-over-claim-poles-killed-more-jews-155700210.html (http://news.yahoo.com/warsaw-acts-over-claim-poles-killed-more-jews-155700210.html)
Polish prosecutors on Thursday opened a libel probe against a US historian after he claimed Poles killed more Jews than Germans during World War II. Last month, German newspaper Die Welt ran an article by the Polish-born Princeton University professor Jan T. Gross in which he sought to explain Poland's wariness of accepting Syrian migrants streaming into Europe by referring to anti-Semitism during the war. "The Poles, for example, were indeed rightfully proud of their society's resistance against the Nazis, but in fact did kill more Jews than Germans during the war," wrote the 68-year-old Jewish historian ... Nowak told public television that the [prosecutor's] office was acting under a paragraph of the criminal code that "provides that any person who publicly insults the Polish nation is punishable by up to three years in prison".
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 18 October 2015 at 01:06
Le Figaro (France)
http://antisemitism.org.il/article/99944/alain-soral-convicted-antisemitic-remarks (http://antisemitism.org.il/article/99944/alain-soral-convicted-antisemitic-remarks)

The court of appeals of Paris confirmed today the conviction of the radical right-wing author Alain Soral, requiring him to pay a fine of 6,000 euros for inciting hatred against the journalist Frédéric Haziza and against the Jews as well ... On his website, Alain Soral described Mr. Haziza as "a journalist of a community about which we have no right to talk about, [a community] which is occupying ... Yes, that's the correct word... We are talking about occupation ... almost the whole ideological structure of France" and is carrying out "a work of tribal censorship". In the verdict, the court of appeals of Paris ruled that the words of Alain Soral are within the bounds of "the most stereotypical antisemitism, and constitute a libel against a community, libelously claiming that it is supposedly seeking to deny the French their freedom of expression".

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 20 October 2015 at 00:02
That's actually the beliefs of the typical National Socialist and most so-called Nationalists. Nationalists by nature are not racial, they are politically nationalist and believe in equality amongst all more than any libtard ever will. While the Nationalist. For Nationalists, it's not about other races coming to overtake your lands, it's the time-worn arguments of France vs Germany, Britain vs France, Poles vs Western Europe, ... et al ad nauseam. To them, if a Gook is born in Scotland and lives his life Scots and talks right, that Gook is considered to be a real Scotsman, while I - who racially am a Scot born in Australia of Scots parents - am nothing but a pretend Scotsman. Nationalism for them is defence of their little tribal lands from people with different accents. Their tiny little piece of turf. Can you believe it?

Racialism for us Creators is respecting the different cultures of our own racial brothers, while defending the formerly All-White-World against the mud hordes that intend to bring about a cultural and racial genocide that will not only see the end of White people, but an end to all civilisation, science and knowledge gained throughout history.

A White Nationalist once told me that the White Race can never end, because we can be brought back through DNA. What science in what civilisation could do that? And when Europe, America and Australia wind the clocks back to the dark ages and stone age, if the Chinks remain as they are with some kind of technologically adept Pan-Asiatic Empire, why would a Gook want to bring back the White Race? If the Gooks succeed in bringing back the mammoth, it will be as Mammoth Burgers. What will they be bringing us back for? Soylent Green Chips?

Anyway, that's how the majority of Nationalists and National Socialists think, and once you get down to it, it really shows that we Creators - We Racial Socialists - are totally on our own. For the meantime, as long as they don't get in our way, we will make use of them as we do the more intelligent of the Kosher Konservatives.

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 23 October 2015 at 00:57
Netanyahu: Hitler Didn't Want to Exterminate the Jews
Haaretz (Israel)
http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.681525 (http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.681525)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked public uproar when on Wednesday he claimed that the Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, was the one who planted the idea of the extermination of European Jewry in Adolf Hitler's mind. The Nazi ruler, Netanyahu said, had no intention of killing the Jews, but only to expel them. In a speech before the World Zionist Congress in Jerusalem, Netanyahu described a meeting between Husseini and Hitler in November, 1941: "Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jew. And Haj Amin al-Husseini went to Hitler and said, 'If you expel them, they'll all come here (to Palestine).' According to Netanyahu, Hitler then asked: "What should I do with them?" and the mufti replied: "Burn them."

Israel's Netanyahu Prompts Uproar by Linking Palestinians to Holocaust
The Associated Press
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20151021/ml--israel-holocaust-4c841bda04.html (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20151021/ml--israel-holocaust-4c841bda04.html)

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sparked uproar in Israel on Wednesday for suggesting that a World War II-era Palestinian leader convinced the Nazis to adopt their Final Solution to exterminate European Jews. Holocaust experts slammed Netanyahu's comments as historically inaccurate and serving the interests of Holocaust deniers by lessening the responsibility of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. Critics also said the statement amounts to incitement against modern-day Palestinians in the midst of a wave of violent unrest and Israeli-Palestinian tensions ... Moshe Zimmermann, a prominent Holocaust and anti-Semitism researcher at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, said Netanyahu made a "far-reaching argument" for political purposes that didn't hold water. He said the comments essentially made Netanyahu a Holocaust denier.

Israel's Netanyahu Under Fire for Holocaust Remarks on World War II Palestinian Leader
BBC News
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34594563 (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34594563)

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been criticised for saying a Palestinian leader persuaded the Nazis to carry out the Holocaust. Mr Netanyahu insisted Adolf Hitler had only wanted to expel Jews from Europe, but that Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Haj Amin al-Husseini told him: "Burn them." However, the chief historian at Israel's memorial to the Holocaust said this account was factually incorrect. Angela Merkel said Germany "abides by its responsibility for the Holocaust". "We are very clear in our minds about the Nazis' responsibility for the break with civilisation that was the Shoah," the German chancellor said. A senior Palestinian official meanwhile said it showed Mr Netanyahu hated Palestinians so much he was willing to absolve Hitler.

The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Meets With Hitler
German newsreel (1941) -- Video

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4rjfi_the-meeting-adolf-hitler-amin-al-hu_news (http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4rjfi_the-meeting-adolf-hitler-amin-al-hu_news)

Narration: "The Führer receives the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem (Amin al-Husseini), one of the most influential leaders of Arab nationalism. The Grand Mufti is the religious leader of the Arabs in Palestine, and at the same time their chief judge and financial administrator. Because of his nationalist position, he has been harshly persecuted by the British, who have offered a reward of 25,000 pounds for his capture. After an adventurous journey he reached Germany by way of Italy." From the German weekly newsreel, "Deutsche Wochenschau," Dec. 10, 1941.

What the Mufti of Jerusalem Said to Hitler: Full Official Record
The Times of Israel
http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-official-record-what-the-mufti-said-to-hitler (http://www.timesofisrael.com/full-official-record-what-the-mufti-said-to-hitler)

The Arabs were Germany's natural friends, Haj Amin al-Husseini told the Nazi leader in 1941, because they had the same enemies - namely the English, the Jews and the Communists. The following is an official German record of the meeting between Adolf Hitler and the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Haj Amin al-Husseini, on Nov. 28, 1941, at the Reich Chancellery in Berlin.

After Netanyahu Comments, Germany Says Responsibility for Holocaust is Ours
http://news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-comments-germany-says-responsibility-holocaust-ours-130322970.html (http://news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-comments-germany-says-responsibility-holocaust-ours-130322970.html)

The German government said on Wednesday that responsibility for the Holocaust lay with the Germans, after Israel's prime minister sparked controversy before a visit to Berlin by saying a Muslim elder had convinced Adolf Hitler to exterminate Jews. "All Germans know the history of the murderous race mania of the Nazis that led to the break with civilization that was the Holocaust," Chancellor Angela Merkel's spokesman Steffen Seibert said when asked about Benjamin Netanyahu's remarks. "This is taught in German schools for good reason, it must never be forgotten. And I see no reason to change our view of history in any way. We know that responsibility for this crime against humanity is German and very much our own." "Hitler didn't want to exterminate the Jews at the time, he wanted to expel the Jews," Netanyahu said in the speech.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 04 November 2015 at 23:29
In Ireland, Prison Sentence for Protesting 'Holocaust Hoax'
Irish Independent (Ireland)

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/man-put-axe-through-tv-in-town-square-in-performance-art-piece-to-further-his-claims-holocaust-did-not-take-place-34151264.html (http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/man-put-axe-through-tv-in-town-square-in-performance-art-piece-to-further-his-claims-holocaust-did-not-take-place-34151264.html)

A judge has jailed a "Holocaust denier" for five months for using performance art in the public square in Ennis to further his claims that the Holocaust did not take place. At Ennis District Court, Judge Patrick Durcan jailed 49-year old Dermot Mulqueen of Steele's Terrace, Ennis for five months for the lunchtime public performance on January 23 ... Mr Mulqueen told the court that the performance art entitled 'Liberation of the Mind' was carried out to launch International Holocaust Hoax Day. Prior to carrying out the performance in front a crowd of mainly teenagers in Ennis, Mr Mulqueen informed his Twitter followers what he was about to do. In front of a crowd at the monument, Mr Mulqueen had erected a sign entitled 'International Holocaust Hoax Day'.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 07 November 2015 at 01:14
History Channel Re-runs Hitler's Killing Machine

As a Dog that Returns to its Vomit, so a Fool Repeats his Foolishness

David Merlin (http://codoh.com/library/authors/2695/) | Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (http://codoh.com/) | November 2015

http://codoh.com/library/document/3781 (http://codoh.com/library/document/3781)

In March 2014 the Smithsonian Institute ran a made-for-television pseudo-documentary called Treblinka-Hitler's Killing Machine. The TV special was ridiculous.

One promotional clip was titled:

Quote from: Private
“Excavating a Secret Gas Chamber: The watershed discovery of Star of David tiles confirms the existence of Treblinka’s gas chambers and becomes the key to reconstructing the death camp’s sinister workings.”

In fact, the film conflated the Star of David with the trademark of the 125-year old Dziewulski Lange porcelain factory in Poland. The mark is actually a heraldic symbol known as a pierced mullet star.

A second promotional clip was titled:

Quote from: Private
“The Bones the Nazis Hid: A forensic archaeologist who investigates modern-day murders uncovers a mass grave that’s remained a secret since the Holocaust.

It turned out that the “expert” forensic archaeologist was excavating at the edge of a known and well-marked Christian cemetery. It seems that a day’s digging in three trenches produced 40 bone fragments. The "expert forensic archeologist," Caroline Sturdy-Colls, was unclear about whose bones these were, how long they had been buried, how many bodies were found (anywhere from 2 to 40 is possible), what killed them (an odd thing to be overlooked for a forensic specialist), and whether any of the bones had been exposed to cremation, (something very relevant to investigations of Treblinka).

These gross errors were pointed out in a letter CODOH sent to the Smithsonian, see Smith's Blog May 22, 2014 (Also available from CODOH's library http://codoh.com/library/document/3305 (http://codoh.com/library/document/3305) here). A more detailed critical analysis was presented in a film by Eric Hunt titled The Treblinka Archeology Hoax http://codoh.com/library/document/3286 (http://codoh.com/library/document/3286) (also available on DVD). A comment on Smith's Blog asked:

Any perspective that the message will be responded [to] by the Smithsonian?

Now we have an answer: The Smithsonian will replay Hitler's Killing Machine on November 8 and twice on November 9. See http://www.smithsonianchannel.com/shows/treblinka-hitlers-killing-machine/0/3403868 (http://www.smithsonianchannel.com/shows/treblinka-hitlers-killing-machine/0/3403868) That the Smithsonian would attach its name to this inaccurate bit of pseudo-science in the first place does no credit to the Institute. That it would air re-runs is disconcerting.

Why does the Smithsonian continue to air a program that is clearly inaccurate to the point of foolishness and exploitive of the tragedies that occurred at Treblinka? I cannot say but it is probably worth it for honest citizens to send polite letters of protest to the Smithsonian:

Chancellor John G. Roberts Jr.
Smithsonian Institute
PO Box 37012
SI Building, Room 153, MRC 010
Washington, D.C. 20013-7012
E-mail: info@si.edu
To Smithsonian Channel: contact@smithsoniannetworks.com.

Smithsonian Networks is a joint venture between CBS Corporation's Showtime Networks and the Smithsonian Institution.

Hitler's Killing Machine started out as, Treblinka: Inside the Murder Factory. That was the working title given to the show by its English producers, Furneaux-Edgar Production working with GroupM Entertainment. This group announced "A SEASON OF FILMS ABOUT THE NAZIS ON CHANNEL 5." Besides Inside the Murder Factory, there were:

Nazi Quest for the Holy Grail,
Hitler’s Children,
Seven Days That Made the Fuhrer,
Hitler’s 9/11

http://realscreen.com/2013/09/16/channel-5-lines-up-genius-and-genocide-series/#ixzz3qgm4Vigq (http://realscreen.com/2013/09/16/channel-5-lines-up-genius-and-genocide-series/#ixzz3qgm4Vigq)

Inside the Murder Factory was deemed a not-sensational-enough title for the U.S. audience, hence a new title was given to the pseudo-documentary, Hitler's Killing Machine.

The staged filming was directed by Alex Nicolic-Dunlap. Alex describes himself as, "an award winning drama and documentary director known for my strong visual style." He also filmed a dramatised documentary titled Escape from Auschwitz. Producer Charles Furneaux is widely known for his 2012 production Nazi Temple of Doom as part of the Revealed TV series. Co-Producer David Edgar is best known for his production of Marilyn:The Last Sessions; a questioning of "What was it that killed her? Movies… sex… politics… drugs… or psychoanalysis?" He also produced, Nazi UFO Conspiracy, an examination of "the evidence that Hitler was building a secret weapon that would move like a flying saucer that could decimate Allied bombing fleets."


Google Search: Tales of the Holohoax (https://www.google.com.au/search?newwindow=1&safe=off&client=opera&hs=Q0E&biw=1920&bih=981&tbm=isch&sa=1&q="tales+of+the+holohoax"&oq="tales+of+the+holohoax"&gs_l=img.3..0i24.285764.294167.0.294505.

http://nazigassings.com/PDFs/TalesV2.pdf (http://nazigassings.com/PDFs/TalesV2.pdf)
In 2008 Simon Sheppard was prosecuted in Britain for its publication, even though the comic had been sold in Britain for around two decades.
http://www.heretical.com/holofun/weberep2.html (http://www.heretical.com/holofun/weberep2.html)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8TH0rBrymQ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8TH0rBrymQ)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 08 November 2015 at 07:24
RamzPaul Video: Did 6 Million Die On A Flat Earth?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEZ58MBbO3M#t (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEZ58MBbO3M#t)
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 18 November 2015 at 22:06
Anne Frank's Diary Gains 'Co-Author' in Copyright Move
The New York Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/books/anne-frank-has-a-co-as-diary-gains-co-author-in-legal-move.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/14/books/anne-frank-has-a-co-as-diary-gains-co-author-in-legal-move.html)

When Otto Frank first published his daughter's red-checked diary and notebooks, he wrote a prologue assuring readers that the book mostly contained her words, written while hiding from the Nazis in a secret annex of a factory in Amsterdam. But now the Swiss foundation that holds the copyright to "The Diary of Anne Frank" is alerting publishers that her father is not only the editor but also legally the co-author of the celebrated book ... Foundation officials "should think very carefully about the consequences," said Agnès Tricoire, a lawyer in Paris who specializes in intellectual property rights in France, where critics have been the most vociferous and are organizing a challenge. "If you follow their arguments, it means that they have lied for years about the fact that it was only written by Anne Frank."
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 18 November 2015 at 22:08
In Germany, 'Nazi Grandma' Sentenced to Prison for 'Holocaust Denial'

http://news.yahoo.com/holocaust-denying-nazi-grandma-gets-10-months-jail-102136724.html (http://news.yahoo.com/holocaust-denying-nazi-grandma-gets-10-months-jail-102136724.html)

A German court has sentenced an 87-year-old grandmother to ten months in jail for Holocaust denial after a trial in which she insisted that Auschwitz was "not historically proven" to be a death camp. That is "only a belief," said Ursula Haverbeck, dubbed Nazi-Oma (Nazi grandma) by the media on Friday. Haverbeck is a notorious extremist who was once chairwoman of a far-right training centre shut down in 2008 for spreading Nazi propaganda. She already has a criminal record with two fines and a suspended sentence for sedition. Haverbeck was dragged back into court after she went on television in April to declare that "the Holocaust is the biggest and most sustainable lie in history". Unapologetic for her comment, she had told the court cheerfully, "yes I said that indeed", according to media reports.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 18 November 2015 at 22:46
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 21 November 2015 at 21:55
German Court Sentences Man to 18 Months in Prison for 'Holocaust Denial'
DPA (Germany)

http://www.dailysabah.com/europe/2015/11/17/german-court-sentences-man-to-18-months-of-imprisonment-for-denying-holocaust (http://www.dailysabah.com/europe/2015/11/17/german-court-sentences-man-to-18-months-of-imprisonment-for-denying-holocaust)

The German Neonazi and Holocaust denier Gerhard Ittner was sentenced to 18 months in prison by a regional court in Bavaria on Tuesday. The court in Nuremberg-Fuerth found the 57-year-old guilty of incitement and disparaging the state and its symbols. Ittner distributed pamphlets denying the Holocaust between 2011 and 2012. Police located him in 2012 in Portugal, where he was distributing propaganda material via the internet. Ittner caused nationwide protests in 2003 when he organized a right-wing gathering near the former Nazi party rallying grounds in Nuremberg. He announced at the time that he was planning additional protests in Nuremberg. Ittner was sentenced to two years and nine months in prison for incitement in 2005 and subsequently went into hiding.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 31 January 2016 at 21:49
Ex-Auschwitz Medic, 95, to Stand Trial in Germany
http://news.yahoo.com/ex-auschwitz-medic-stand-trial-february-29-113421487.html (http://news.yahoo.com/ex-auschwitz-medic-stand-trial-february-29-113421487.html)


A 95-year-old former medic at the Auschwitz death camp will go on trial next month on at least 3,681 counts of accessory to murder, German authorities said Monday. Hubert Zafke was a medical orderly at the camp from August 15, 1944, to September 14, 1944 ... Ahead of proceedings due to begin February 29, prosecutors said Zafke was "aware of the purpose of the Birkenau camp as an extermination camp" as well as of its structure. "Given his awareness, the accused lent support to the organisation of the camp and was thereby both involved in and advanced the extermination," said prosecutors ... The court acknowledged that he had "cognitive impairments and low physical capacity" and ordered regular breaks during the hearings, as well as medical care.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 13 February 2016 at 22:59
Consternation at Austrian Case of Nazi Camp Survivors Called a 'Plague'
http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKCN0VJ2IF (http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCAKCN0VJ2IF)

Concentration camp survivors voiced indignation on Wednesday at an Austrian prosecutor's statement that it was justifiable for a far-right magazine to call people who were liberated from the Nazi camp at Mauthausen a criminal "plague." An article in the July/ August edition of the far-right Die Aula magazine said that description applied to a significant number of freed inmates, saying they committed a range of crimes nearby after Nazi guards fled at the end of World War Two.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 13 June 2016 at 20:46
Italy's Parliament Approves Bill Criminalizing 'Holocaust Denial'
Jewish Telegraph Agency (http://jta.org/) | 9 June 2016
http://jta.org/2016/06/09/news-opinion/world/italys-parliament-approves-bill-criminalizing-holocaust-denial (http://jta.org/2016/06/09/news-opinion/world/italys-parliament-approves-bill-criminalizing-holocaust-denial)

Italy's Parliament approved a bill making spreading Holocaust denial illegal. The bill, which adds to an existing anti-racism bill, was approved Wednesday evening by the lower assembly of the Parliament, the Chamber of Deputies, by a vote of 237-5, with 102 abstentions. The new law would go after those who deny genocide or crimes against humanity, using the definition by the International Court of Justice, the German news agency DPA reported. Those convicted could face prison terms of two to six years. The measure punishes ideas "based entirely or partly" on negationist ideology only when "there is a real danger of their dissemination," according to DPA. [more ... (http://jta.org/2016/06/09/news-opinion/world/italys-parliament-approves-bill-criminalizing-holocaust-denial)]
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 13 June 2016 at 20:49
In California, People Sign 'Holocaust Celebration' Petitions
Mark Dice - Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oQhuDkky38 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oQhuDkky38)

As a social experiment, media analyst Mark Dice asks randomly selected people at a beach pier in southern California to sign a petition to keep the "Holocaust Beach Party" from being canceled due to budget cuts. The Holocaust, he explains, is a "favorite celebration of the Jewish people," a "Jewish festival," and a "Jewish holiday." He urges support for the "Holocaust celebration" and the "Holocaust reenactment." No one disputes what he says. Dice is surprised and frustrated by the ignorance of these ordinary Americans. Many Americans seem utterly unmoved by what politicians, educators and the media in the US has been telling them for years about the importance of "the Holocaust."
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 08 September 2016 at 11:59
Jewish Leaders Urge Britain's Labour Party to Expel Major Figure for Statements About Hitler and Zionism
The Times of Israel


The umbrella organization of British Jews on Monday called on the opposition Labour Party to expel Ken Livingstone from its ranks "immediately," after the controversial former London mayor, a close ally of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, again claimed that Adolf Hitler once supported the Zionist movement ... Livingstone repeated the claims that he made on her show in April, which led to his suspension from the Labour party ... "It's going to be very difficult for them to expel me from the Labour Party when I've got this whole sheaf of documents and papers which shows that what I said was true. The fact (is) that during the 1930s, Hitler collaborated with the Zionists and supported them because he believed that a solution to his problem - the Jews - was that they should all move to Palestine," Livingstone said.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 13 September 2016 at 02:34
Poland Poised to Put 'Bad' Holocaust Historians in Prison

Forward  (New York) (http://forward.com/)


Jan Grabowski, a historian at the University of Ottawa, expects his upcoming book to be controversial in his native Poland. But if a proposed new law is approved by Poland's parliament this fall, as expected, Grabowski's book, which examines the role of Poland's police force in robbing and murdering Jews under the Nazis, may also get him sentenced to prison if he visits the country ... The government bill, prepared by the Ministry of Justice, would make it a criminal offense, punishable by up to three years in prison, for anyone to implicate Poland, or the Polish people, in the crimes of the German Third Reich.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 17 December 2016 at 11:13
Anne Frank Fraud Continues with a Slight Alteration ...

Anne Frank may not have been betrayed to Nazis, study finds

Associated Press, in The Hague | The Guardian (https://www.theguardian.com/) (UK) | 17 December 2016


Extract: Anne Frank may not have been betrayed to Nazi occupiers, but captured by chance.

A new study published Friday by the Anne Frank House museum in Amsterdam says despite decades of research there is no conclusive evidence the Jewish diarist and her family were betrayed to the Netherlands’ German occupiers during the second world war, leading to their arrest and deportation.


Ronald Leopold, Executive Director of the Anne Frank House museum, said new research “illustrates that other scenarios should also be considered”.

One possible theory is that the 4 August, 1944 raid that led to Anne’s arrest could have been part of an investigation into illegal labor or falsified ration coupons at the canal-side house where she and other Jews hid for just over two years.

The new research points to two men who worked in the building on Amsterdam’s Prinsengracht canal and dealt in illegal ration cards. They were arrested earlier in 1944 and subsequently released, Dutch records show.

Such arrests were reported to an investigation division based in The Hague and the report says that, “During their day-to-day activities, investigators from this department often came across Jews in hiding by chance.”

Another possibility raised by the report is that the raid was part of an investigation into people being allowed to work to prevent them being called up as forced labor and sent to Germany.

“A company where people were working illegally and two sales representatives were arrested for dealing in ration coupons obviously ran the risk of attracting the attention of the authorities,” the report says.

“The possibility of betrayal has of course not been entirely ruled out by this, nor has any relationship between the ration coupon fraud and the arrest been proven, ... Clearly, the last word about that fateful summer day in 1944 has not yet been said,” it adds.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 December 2016 at 06:04

THE Nazis may have discovered Anne Frank’s hiding place by accident — and not because the tragic teenager and her family were betrayed, as historians have long believed.

A new study conducted by Amsterdam’s Anne Frank House Museum and reported by the Sunday Times of London found no evidence that Anne, and the seven other Jews who lived with her in hiding for two years, were denounced to German occupiers in 1944.

Instead, the Nazis may have been chasing down counterfeiters who were producing false ration coupons.

Two men who worked in the commercial building where the Frank family huddled in a secret annex — and who Anne wrote about in her now-famous diary — were arrested for dealing fake coupons on the black market, the study found.

“During their day-to-day activities, investigators ... often came across Jews in hiding by chance,” wrote historian Gertjan Broek.

Broek found no proof of a connection between the arrests and the roundup of the Frank family on August 4, 1944, but also found no evidence of a denunciation that could have led the Germans to the movable bookcase in the building on the Prinsengracht canal.

Anne died in the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp in February 1945, two months before it was liberated by Allied forces, at the age of 15.

Her father Otto, the only family member to survive the camps, discovered her journal when he returned to their hiding place after the war.

Published in English as “The Diary of a Young Girl” in 1952, her heartbreaking account of her life in hiding was translated into 67 languages and turned Anne into an icon.

In the decades since World War II, researchers have never come to a consensus over how the Franks were discovered.

This story was originally published in the New York Post and is republished here with permission.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 29 May 2017 at 01:10
Jewish Supremacists: Zionist ADL Calls on Google to Remove 'Deniers' From 'Holocaust Historian' Search Results
The Algemeiner (https://www.algemeiner.com/) (Brooklyn, NY) "The fastest growing Jewish newspaper in America" | 22 May 2017

An Anti-Defamation League (ADL) cyber-hate expert has called on Google to take action following revelations that Holocaust deniers truthers are included in the image bar results for a search of "Holocaust historians." Jonathan Vick - the ADL's associate director of investigative technology and cyber-hate - said he was certain that Google would edit the algorithm for the search results to ensure the exclusion of deniers and antisemites."[Google has] been confronted with this sort of issue in the past, and there is not real question of how they will respond," Vick said. "These are unintended and painful consequences of an algorithm that clearly needs human intervention." The very first "historian" listed is David Irving  ...

Jewish Leaders Demand Removal of David Irving Books From University Open Library
Christian Today (https://www.christiantoday.com/) (Britain)

A heavyweight group of national Jewish leaders is demanding that Manchester University removes books by the Holocaust denier David Irving from 'open access' in its main library. A letter appealing to Manchester's vice chancellor Dame Nancy Rothwell will been sent this week, jointly signed by the Jewish Leadership Council, the Board of Deputies of British Jews ... The intervention marks a major boost for the ongoing campaign to persuade the university to change its position ... In response, the university said it was considering re-cataloguing the books but refused to move them from open display in the John Rylands library.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 17 June 2017 at 00:39
Hungary Hands Over 'Holocaust Denier' Horst Mahler to Germany
Deutsche Welle (Germany)

Prominent Holocaust denier Horst Mahler was extradited to Germany from Hungary on Tuesday. The 81-year-old right-wing extremist was handed to German officials at Budapest airport after being arrested in May, according to the news agency MTI, which cited Hungarian police. He was greeted by lawyers after landing in Berlin and transferred to a Brandenburg prison. Mahler, once a lawyer, was jailed for ten years in 2009 for repeated incitement to racial hatred and Holocaust denial, a crime in Germany. He was temporarily released in the summer of 2015 due to a serious illness (the lower part of his left leg was amputated as a result of an infection), but this release was rescinded at the end of 2016 for other offences committed while in prison. Instead of returning to prison he fled to Hungary in April this year.

Call for Holocaust Education to be Mandatory in Scottish Schools
The Herald/ Sunday Herald (Scotland, UK)

Extract: The Holocaust should be a mandatory part of the Scottish curriculum, teachers have said. The genocide, in which some six million Jews were killed, is currently taught in many primary and secondary schools, but is not compulsory. Primary pupils already routinely learn about the Holocaust through the study of Anne Frank's diary and the subject is discussed in religious and moral education classes and is a feature of the history curriculum. Some senior pupils also get the chance to visit death camps such as Auschwitz as part of educational school trips. However, members of the Educational Institute of Scotland (EIS) teaching union said the Holocaust was so important it should be embedded in Curriculum for Excellence. 
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 June 2017 at 02:52
Sweden Launches Program to Fight 'Holocaust Denial' and Anti-Semitism
The Jerusalem Post (http://www.jpost.com/) (Israel)

Extract: Stockholm has stepped up efforts to teach about the Holocaust as a means of fighting against antisemitism, the director of a government-run program targeting the issue said. "The Swedish government is investing a lot of money to combat the phenomenon of antisemitism and Islamophobia," Ingrid Lomfors, director of the Living History Forum in Sweden added, in an interview ... The Forum is a public authority established by Sweden some 15 years ago with the aim of "promoting democracy, tolerance and human rights using the Holocaust as a starting point." In November the government announced an additional 156 million Krona [US$ 18 million] stipend to develop a new national program for Holocaust remembrance, with the aim of combating antisemitism and racism.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 19 June 2017 at 18:21
The aliens want more self loathing sympathetic followers and supporters.This is the one way to cover up the greatest, dirtiest lie ever told.

Even more suppression of the common man's freedom of speech. 
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 02 December 2017 at 01:17
In Germany, 'Nazi Grandma' Sentenced to Prison for 'Holocaust Denial'
http://news.yahoo.com/holocaust-denying-nazi-grandma-gets-10-months-jail-102136724.html (http://news.yahoo.com/holocaust-denying-nazi-grandma-gets-10-months-jail-102136724.html)

A German court has sentenced an 87-year-old grandmother to ten months in jail for Holocaust denial after a trial in which she insisted that Auschwitz was "not historically proven" to be a death camp. That is "only a belief," said Ursula Haverbeck, dubbed Nazi-Oma (Nazi grandma) by the media on Friday. Haverbeck is a notorious extremist who was once chairwoman of a far-right training centre shut down in 2008 for spreading Nazi propaganda. She already has a criminal record with two fines and a suspended sentence for sedition. Haverbeck was dragged back into court after she went on television in April to declare that "the Holocaust is the biggest and most sustainable lie in history". Unapologetic for her comment, she had told the court cheerfully, "yes I said that indeed", according to media reports.

German Woman, 89, Sentenced to 14 Months in Prison for 'Holocaust Denial'
Associated Press

Extract: A German court has upheld two convictions of a well-known neo-Nazi for Holocaust denial and sentenced her to 14 months in prison. Ursula Haverbeck, 89, was sentenced Tuesday by a district appeals court in Detmold for repeatedly denying the Holocaust, which is a crime in Germany. Haverbeck had appealed her 2016 conviction for writing to the Detmold mayor during the trial of an Auschwitz guard claiming the death camp was only a labor camp. In closing arguments at that trial she again denied the Holocaust, prompting another conviction. Several courts have sentenced Haverbeck to prison sentences in the past, including a Berlin district court in October, but Haverbeck has remained free pending appeals
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 02 December 2017 at 11:17
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 07 January 2018 at 02:37
Canadian 'Holocaust Denier' and Former Green Candidate Arrested in Germany
Canadian Jewish News (http://www.cjnews.com/)
Extract: German-Canadian Holocaust denier truther and former Green Party of Canada candidate Monika Schaefer was arrested on Jan. 3 in Munich, reportedly while attending the trial of a lawyer accused of Holocaust denial. According to an open letter written by her brother Alfred Schaefer - a German-Canadian who was also charged last year in Germany for criminal incitement due to his anti-Semitic and Holocaust-denying activities - his sister was attending the trial of Holocaust-denier Sylvia Stolz, when she was arrested during a recess in the proceedings ... In the 2016 YouTube video, Monika Schaefer - a musician from Jasper, Alta. - referred to the Holocaust as "the biggest and most pernicious and persistent lie in all of history."
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 12 February 2018 at 23:23
Free Monika Schaefer

A DOZEN MEMBERS OF VANCOUVER-BASED TRUTH AND jUSTICE FOR GERMANS (TJFG) HELD A PROTEST at the German Consulate here and presented Consul General Josef Beck with a letter condemning the jailing of Canadian Monika Schaefer in Munich, Germany on January 3.

Monika is still being held in a maximum security prison and until very recently was denied visitors other than from the Canadian Consulate in Munich. TJFG is demanding the release of Monika Schaefer. A spokesman for the group delivered the letter printed below directly to Consul Beck who responded cordially.

Afterwards the group held a short protest outside the Consulate displaying large pictures of the Alberta violin teacher and four-time Green Party candidate who set off a small town firestorm of shunning and bigotry when she released a short video in June, 2016 entitled "Sorry, Mom, I was Wrong About the Holocaust."

Organizer and videographer Brian Ruhe noted: "No press showed up. In the morning between 8:30 am – 9:00 a.m. I phoned CBC, CTV and Global News and emailed the last two. Diane pointed out that the controlled media probably doesn’t want to cover this subject."

And, Mr. Ruhe added, "We felt good about our demonstration and  afterwards we went to the coffee shop there at Canada Place.


Source: https://carolynyeager.net/truth-and-justice-germans-holds-protest-vancouver
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 15 September 2019 at 21:11
Six Million Jews - 1915 1938 10 Newspapers


Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 24 September 2019 at 23:25
Jewish Supremacists of the Anti-Defamation Commission (Australia's version of the Anti-Defamation League - ADL) wants to make it a crime to own a copy of Hogan's Heroes memorabilia ...

Jewish community leader hits out at the online trade of Nazi memorabilia in Australia saying sellers are profiting off 'Satan's instruments'

* Jewish community leader has hit out at sale of Nazi memorabilia on social media
* Dr Dvir Abramovich is a leading campaigner against continued sale of Nazi items
* He told Daily Mail Australia it creates dangerous precedent to have items on sale

Adam McCleery | Daily Mail (UK) | 24 September 2019


A Jewish community leader has slammed the sale of Nazi memorabilia on social media saying people are profiting from 'blood stained items'.

Dozens of items from Nazi Germany are being sold online across Australia, and Anti-Defamation Commission chairman Dr Dvir Abramovich said the ''ideology and culture that fuelled the extermination of millions still remains'.

Dr Abramovich is a leading campaigner in the fight against the rise of Neo-Nazism and said the internet had emboldened them to spread their messages and symbols of hate more freely.

As a result he feels the people who run pages and sites which supply Nazi memorabilia have a duty to prevent the circulation of 'blood-soaked items'. 

'The administrators of these pages will not get a free pass on this issue, and cannot defend the indefensible,' he said.

'If you want to stare pure evil in the face, and see Satan's instruments responsible for the systematic liquidation of millions, look no further than the blood-soaked objects showcased here.'

The sale of Nazi memorabilia has become common place online with some items being sold on Facebook's marketplace and closed groups at alarming rates.

'The indecent and lucrative trade in Nazi merchandise, which is booming here and around the world, should alarm us all,' Dr Abramovich said.

'The dark fetish for these perverse items that could have been used in the murder and torture of Jews and others is beyond sickening.'

Owner of the privately run Woods Militaria Facebook page for collectors and sellers, Jonathan Woodward told 7 News he canvased all his buyers before confirming a sale and had no sympathy for the Nazi ideology.

'I check the profiles of all buyers and sellers, if both sides are not represented then the bad will repeat itself,' he told the publication.

'Private sellers keep a lot of people informed and I will only sell to people interested in history.'

Esk Military Antiques proprietor Bill Brown also said he is stringent with who he sells the controversial items to but said it was also important not to take the practice underground.

'It's history and it has to be told so it can't be repeated, if we just ignore it, it has a good chance of happening again,' he said.

However Dr Abramovich said he doubts real collectors re buying the items only for historical value.

'I would not be surprised if these obscene objects end up in the hands of Hitler worshippers who will proudly hang it in their lounge, or put them up on their mantelpiece to show their friends,' he said.

Dr Abramaovich also stated the sale of such items was not only an affront to Jewish people but to all those who died at the hands of Nazis or died fighting against them.   

'The pages offering this paraphernalia are not only an affront to those who perished in the Holocaust and the survivors living amongst us, but are a kick in the stomach to the memory of the Australian soldiers who gave their lives to defeat the Third Reich,' he said.

'In fact, can't imagine the anguish Holocaust survivors and our brave diggers would be feeling right now.'

The rise in white supremacists has also caused concern for Dr Abramovich with the sale of Nazi memorabilia possibly emboldening them more.

'Those trafficking in these cursed objects must understand that through their actions they are keeping alive the embers of perversion, and these acts may indicate active approval and celebration of the Nazis' deeds,' he said.

Note to Self: Edit post to include mocking holohoax images.
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 25 September 2019 at 11:42
Jewish Supremacists of the Anti-Defamation Commission (Australia's version of the Anti-Defamation League - ADL) wants to make it a crime to own a copy of Hogan's Heroes memorabilia ...

Jewish community leader hits out at the online trade of Nazi memorabilia in Australia saying sellers are profiting off 'Satan's instruments'

* Jewish community leader has hit out at sale of Nazi memorabilia on social media
* Dr Dvir Abramovich is a leading campaigner against continued sale of Nazi items
* He told Daily Mail Australia it creates dangerous precedent to have items on sale

Adam McCleery | Daily Mail (UK) | 24 September 2019


A Jewish community leader has slammed the sale of Nazi memorabilia on social media saying people are profiting from 'blood stained items'.

Dozens of items from Nazi Germany are being sold online across Australia, and Anti-Defamation Commission chairman Dr Dvir Abramovich said the ''ideology and culture that fuelled the extermination of millions still remains'.

People will just go abroad and buy it or order it.
Watch your original stuff skyrocket in value!

Won’t stop people buying Re- issues at least they aren’t “blood soaked items”?!
Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 25 September 2019 at 15:20
✡ISRAELI HYPOCRISY✡ Demjanjuk, Zundel, Salomon Morel & Rep. Traficant

Title: Re: The #Holocaust as a Modern Weapon of Lawfare (((HoloHOAX)))
Post by: Private on 11 November 2019 at 15:51
Trump deports last Nazi war criminal in US back to Germany

... Until the next poor old bastard is dragged out when they manage to change the laws to make any WHITE MAN born in that period as guilty of the Holohoax.

The JOG says the 95-year-old who came to America in 1949 hid his past as an armed guard in a brutal Nazi prison camp and was stripped of his citizenship years ago.