Creator Forum - Racial Loyalty News Online

I was thinking about who is our White intellectual elite? It's us by sheer default. Of course we of the CA are only a small handful, and most of us do not use big college fag words (most of us seem to speak in laymens terms like I do) but through sheer common sense I believe we are more intelligent then non racialist Whites for sure and I think we have a lot more common sense then most pro White groups out there. I think our message falls on deaf ears because most people are not intelligent enough to grasp it and 2 because it is radically different from the mainstream.

The genius of Klassen was in his simplicity and his common sense of using the lessons of history. We need to expand upon that. If you look at other ideologies (enemy ones like marxism, judaism, islam) they have their gameplan all spelled out for them where all they have to do is stick with the plan, sadly for us it's working. Klassen said once we wake up our brethren the problem would be solved, I think he was hoping for some great leader to unite us all. The reality is we cannot wait for such an event. I think if we spelled out clearly what we plan on doing and how we go about doing it after we have the numbers (even though it is getting ahead of ourselves) that we will not need leadership. I'm talking about how our utopic state would be. Islam has it all spelled out and the jew has the protocols of zion which is near completion by the way, it works for them it should work for us too.

Also where the White Power scene has failed waking up Whites where Marxists have succeeded waking up muds and corrupting our own is they put there moderates in the spotlight and won't admit to their ultimate goal publicly. 'This tactic has been working for them and it could work for us too, we have it ass backwards with only radical pro White voices being heard (if heard at all) besides maybe David Duke. Have you ever heard the saying "you catch more flies with honey"? I believe it to be true. The so called "moderate" muslims also apply this tactic and it's working.
The enemy uses a multi pronged attack on us, we should do the same instead of putting all our eggs in one basket. We should fight fire with fire. If we attract followers of a moderate message it is one step closer to them accepting our full message and given time most of them will. Is it sneaky? Yes it is, but it works.

Another tactic used against us in politics everyday is incrementalism. When you cannot push the full brunt of your agenda all at once, you push parts of it at a time to add up collectively to your goal. One example would be gun control laws. Since they cannot ban guns in one swoop, they ban certain guns one at a time and keep doing it until there's none left. The enemy uses these tactics and always lies about their total goal of banning guns, saying such lies as "we believe in the right to own a gun just not these guns". We could be just as dirty and underhanded as they are and do the same thing to them.

What I am saying is, any tactic historically proven to work is what we should be doing.

Secrecy, another tactic that has worked for the freemasons and other groups. Using different groups as a front but having a secret group pulling the strings behind the scenes. We do not have the money to do this the same way they are at this point in time but we can infiltrate and influence groups. We can also infiltrate and expose groups with an enemy ideology and destroy them.

I would like to hear all of your ideas and if possible I'd like to see a White version of the protocols of zion.
We are not just fighting a racial war it is also a war of ideas. If we ever do unite our race it will be through winning that war of ideas.